#Intelligent Document Processing Tools
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Empowering Business Leaders With BI Tools’ Rapid Data Analysis
Leaders are inundated with vast amounts of data from various sources. Managing and extracting actionable insights from this information is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge. Intelligent Document Processing tools have emerged as invaluable assets, enabling businesses to analyse extensive data sets and make informed decisions swiftly.
Understanding Intelligent Document Processing
IDP leverages advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction, classification, and analysis of data from diverse document types. This automation reduces the reliance on manual data entry, minimises errors, and accelerates the availability of critical information.
Benefits for Business Owners
Rapid Data Analysis: Best Intelligent Document Processing Software can process and analyse large volumes of documents in minutes, providing business leaders with timely insights essential for strategic planning.
Enhanced Decision-Making: By converting unstructured data into structured formats, IDP facilitates a deeper understanding of business operations, customer behaviors, and market trends, leading to more informed decision-making.
Operational Efficiency: Automating document processing workflows reduces manual labor, allowing teams to focus on higher-value tasks and improving overall productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimising manual intervention decreases the likelihood of errors and associated costs, resulting in significant financial savings over time.
Scalability: IDP solutions can easily scale to accommodate growing data volumes, ensuring consistent performance as your business expands.
Predictive Analytics: A Strategic Advantage
A notable advancement in IDP is the integration of predictive analytics. By analysing historical data, IDP systems can forecast trends and patterns, enabling businesses to anticipate market shifts and customer needs. This foresight allows for proactive strategy development and a more agile response to emerging opportunities and challenges.
Implementing IDP in Your Business
For business owners considering the adoption of IDP tools, the following steps can guide a successful implementation:
Assess Your Needs: Identify the types of documents and data your business handles and determine the specific challenges you aim to address with IDP.
Choose the Right Solution: Select an IDP tool that aligns with your business requirements, offers scalability, and integrates seamlessly with your existing systems.
Train Your Team: Ensure your staff is adequately trained to use the new system effectively, maximising the benefits of the technology.
Monitor and Optimise: Continuously monitor the performance of the IDP system and make necessary adjustments to optimise its efficiency and effectiveness.
Conclusion
Intelligent Document Processing Tools represent a transformative approach for business leaders seeking to enhance data analysis capabilities and drive informed decision-making. By embracing IDP, businesses can navigate the complexities of modern data landscapes with greater agility and confidence, positioning themselves for sustained success in a competitive market.
For those interested in exploring advanced IDP solutions, Envistudios' Documente offers a comprehensive platform designed to meet the diverse needs of today's businesses.
Original Source - https://envistudios.medium.com/empowering-business-leaders-with-bi-tools-rapid-data-analysis-702bbfc62320
0 notes
Text
Struggling with endless paperwork and administrative headaches in healthcare? Discover how automation is revolutionizing the way clinics, hospitals, and care facilities operate! In our latest blog post, “Reducing Administrative Burden with Automation,” we dive deep into the real-world impact of admin overload, share eye-opening industry stats, and reveal how AI-driven automation is freeing up staff, cutting costs, and putting patient care back at the center. Learn how leading organizations are slashing wait times, boosting satisfaction, and transforming their operations—one automated workflow at a time. Ready to see what’s possible? Read the full story now!
0 notes
Text
🤖📑 🔀Intelligent Document Processing Trends 2025
More and more businesses are adopting Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) technology to optimize and enhance data extraction, significantly improving work efficiency and customer experience. Let's explore the emerging technological trends that will shape Intelligent Document Processing in 2025. Read our full guide to learn more!
0 notes
Text
this isn't the first time we've seen evidence that the current climate of anti-trans panic in the US has largely been manufactured by (or at the very least, stoked by) a small number of conservative interest groups, but the leaked materials from this group do make it pretty clear that trans people are being used a wedge issue to increase republican turnout:
In a member briefing video, one of Ziklag’s spiritual advisers outlined a plan to “deliver swing states” by using an anti-transgender message to motivate conservative voters who are exhausted with Trump.
although it does seem like they believe their own rhetoric and aren't "just" willing to turn trans people into collateral damange:
Other internal Ziklag documents voice strong opposition to same-sex marriage and transgender rights. One reads: “transgender acceptance = Final sign before imminent collapse.”
and somehow this is only the tip of the iceberg here:
a charity funded by mega-wealthy christian donors who think that secular mega-wealthy donors are more generous than christians (much to unpack there lol) and want to close that gap
the fact that it's set up a tax-exempt 5013c org but 100% operating as a PAC, which according to a little group called the IRS is super duper illegal
general christian nationalist shit, including a belief that “the biblical role of government is to promote good and punish evil” and that “the word of god and prayer play a significant role in policy decisions"
using a tool called eagleAI that "claim[s] to use artificial intelligence to automate and speed up the process of challenging ineligible voters" in a bid to kick 100k+ voters off the rolls in swing states
a seven-pronged plan that extends into non-political avenues like the entertainment industry, like a goal to make 80% of movies produced either have a G or PG rating and offer a tidy moral
the hobby lobby family is here because of course they are
485 notes
·
View notes
Note
Does this mean we can have silk “scarf” or “shawls” in BB
bc that would make every scene so much better imagine Mistystar making a speech with silk accessories
I've been on-and-off looking at the possibility of the Clans making accessories out of silk for a few months now, but because of a lack of good historical examples to draw from, I've sadly had to rule it out for now.
Eastern silk production, which produces enough strong material to actually get used as a textile, is completely dependent on the fabulous, beautiful animal known as Bombyx Mori, the Domestic Silk Moth. What's amazing about this moth is that it's been domesticated for 5,000 years, and is so genetically distinct from its ancestors that they can't always produce offspring with their direct progenitor, Bombyx Mandarina!
In the west, we don't have any species (that I know of) which are capable of producing enough fiber. So far I've explored three kinds of animals, but hit snags with each one.
First one I started looking at was just some sort of alternative to bombyx mori, another silk-producing moth. While "wild silks" have been collected and used in the Americas, Africa, Asia, and even the Mediterranean and Middle East, it seems like central and northern Europe are like the one place on the planet where there's no appropriate wild silk moths.
At some point I encountered the Caddisfly and went down a small rabbithole for them. Caddis silk is VERY similar to that of a silkworm chemically, but also water resistant. Unfortunately, caddisflies cover their sticky cocoons in rocks and sticks, like bagworms. That would probably make the silk less useful.
The most promising was spider silk. Used as wound dressings since ancient times, briefly used to create paintings, plus several "proof of concepts" of modern humans applying silkworm techniques to create small amounts of textiles, several factors made me back off.
Spiders produce several kinds of silk, unlike insects which typically only make one per species. This means that you can't just apply "one technique" to turn all their silk from Bug Butt String to Useable Material-- you have to develop a technique for egg casing silk, dragline silk, capture silk, etc.
This means that I'd need to separately research every documented instance of spider silk weaving to understand what type of spider silk they were using, PLUS what species it came from, and if that species has any relatives in the modeled region, and if those relatives produce the right sort of silk, etc.
AND if these processes require too many advanced tools, all of that work would go out the window since Clan cats are working with sticks and rocks.
So, unless somehow unlimited money falls on me tomorrow and I get to hire a fleet of entomologists to conduct Silly Cat Experiments in tandem with, I can't find a path to silk textiles yet.
.....YET.
Because I can feel it in my bones that somehow, intelligent cats would be MILES ahead of human cultures in this technology. I think it would be just like humans and cheese. We didn't domesticate cows for their milk-- we domesticated them for MEAT, and THEN accidentally figured out how to make cheese by keeping milk in early "leather" (stomach) bags.
Likewise, cat cultures would be domesticating insects for food first. Silk would be a byproduct.
So someday I'd like to sit down and just explore what sorts of insects they would logically prioritize as food, which of those do well in captive conditions, and then work from there. Not only would it generally give me a good place to start with, but most importantly, it would feel more organic. As much as possible, I try to avoid working "backwards" culturally by starting with a tech and then figuring out how they got it.
Anyway! Mistystar can still have accessories
The primary textiles that Clan cats have is leather, linen, and yarn. Linen is the highest quality and most labor intensive material they have, worn by leaders, clerics, and other high-ranking cats as a sign of their status.
The shawl is actually canon lmao, a supporting character in Darkstar's Commandment is actually going to be wearing one. Xeir name is Smallstar, and they get to NOT die in BB because of the fact that Mapleshade's kittens are the ones who died to create Commandment 14. Runningstorm and Wolfheart also have very small cameos.
#clan culture#silk processing#so if the word 'Silk' pops up in a name it is currently referring to the natural fiber
136 notes
·
View notes
Text
Brazil’s AI-powered social security app is wrongly rejecting claims

When Josélia de Brito, a former sugarcane worker from a remote town in northeast Brazil, filed for her retirement benefits through the mandated government app, she expected her claim would be processed quickly. Instead, her request was instantly turned down because the system identified her as a man.
It was especially frustrating for de Brito, who had been requesting sick pay for years via the National Social Security Institute’s artificial intelligence-powered app, Meu INSS. De Brito had worked in the fields since she was a teenager, and suffered from a herniated disc, scoliosis, and fibromyalgia — chronic illnesses that made her eligible for social benefits. But even minor errors in her claims filed through the app had led to numerous rejections, with few options for recourse.
“I have all the documents proving my health condition, proving everything, and [the benefit] still gets denied. It’s a humiliation,” de Brito, 55, who is illiterate and had to ask her daughter to file the claims, told Rest of World. It’s very hard on rural workers, in particular, who “have worked for so much time,” she said.
Brazil’s social security institute, known as INSS, added AI to its app in 2018 in an effort to cut red tape and speed up claims. The office, known for its long lines and wait times, had around 2 million pending requests for everything from doctor’s appointments to sick pay to pensions to retirement benefits at the time. While the AI-powered tool has since helped process thousands of basic claims, it has also rejected requests from hundreds of people like de Brito — who live in remote areas and have little digital literacy — for minor errors.
Continue reading.
#brazil#politics#brazilian politics#artificial intelligence#image description in alt#mod nise da silveira
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
Before the students left Rek, the rakii had been in the process of developing their own AI. At first they were gifted such intelligence by the students, providing washed-down copies of themselves to add to their tech and craft management. But when the need for more personalized AI and general curiosity arose, they went to work, using the student provided AI as a base or reference point. From there, three types of AI sprouted off these projects: • Student AI - Highly valuable, practical holy relics of what remains of the students. These are "purest" AI and are strictly held within Iot's control, only able to function off student tech. There are only 4 existing and 2 remain within the Idle Library. These AI are again, much more watered-down and while are fairly sentient they aren't 100% sapient.
• Hybrid or Steward AI - A mix between student and rakii coding. Since rakii couldn't exactly copy paste the student AI's themselves, what was given, they managed add on it. These AI were specialized and trained to understand the workings of rakii history, and language, while also being able to work on both student and rakii devices. They are still held under Iot control but with special permission, they can be granted to important government official or funded servers. These AI are a tad more self-aware, understanding their purpose and history just fine.
• Factotum AI - Completely rakii made and trained AI. With little to no student involvement, these AI are either standard algorithmic run assistants or commercially used for things like personal computers, phones, self-driven vehicles (mainly rail cars and public transit) or vending machines. Not ALL devices have AI of course, as the general public have a lot of mixed feelings towards, not such distain but prefer to be the only one in control of their tools. On the upside, they are heavily regulated and lack any possibility for self-awareness or sapience. The ones displayed here are two steward AI named Wyrr'Yoii (left) and Booror (right). Wyrr'Yoii is currently housed on the lunar settlement, Wubu maintaining life support and security, taking the avatar of a temperate. They were handed over to the rakii aerospace committee by Iot, which is heavily funded by the city for the investment of seeking out their missing gods. Wyrr'Yoii is described to be standardly monotone and critical, yet easy-going and understanding. They know exactly where their functionally lies and are always willing to lookout for the inhabitants within them. They have long-range communication with ground control, and furthest orbiting station in their system, "The Needle of Shwati" (A Wubu settler checking in with Wyrr'Yoii)
Booror, is housed within an arctic government building in the Shto Dominion hence taking an arctic avatar. Having accepted trading offers and territory with Iot, they were later granted a steward to keep purpose tabs and documents on community. Ensuring those higher up are up-to-date with any possible trading changes. Though the general public are often wary of this development as recently there has been a project in the works of providing AI with RC units, wanting to see how these AI can interact with the physical world. One unit being an elaborate success, however the reactions of many were generally, "It looks creepy." and it became more of an underground project. (Cartographer Wa'chaa "Quiibii" Iot, speaking with Saiba in their RC unit)
#rakii#sci fi#alien#aliens#spec evo#possibly the longest info dump I've ever made woo#my bf had come up with some interesting ideas for rakii display tech too#stay tuned
83 notes
·
View notes
Text
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit on Monday against the US Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). In its lawsuit, the ACLU accuses the agencies of violating the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by ignoring the ACLU’s requests and subsequent appeals for information concerning the so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) “attempted or actual access” to sensitive federal databases.
The ACLU began pursuing documents under the federal transparency law in February, as WIRED first reported, responding to reports that Elon Musk’s DOGE operatives were seeking access to troves of personal information belonging to US citizens, including US Department of Treasury records that contain “millions of Social Security numbers, bank accounts, business finances,” and more.
Over the last few months, extensive reporting by WIRED and other outlets has exposed DOGE’s attempts to access and analyze sensitive data on federal employees, the American public, and immigrants to the US.
In its complaint, the ACLU argues that DOGE’s access to highly sensitive information about Americans’ health and finances raises “acute concerns” due to the “extraordinary harm” that can result from any unauthorized use of those files. According to the complaint, the ACLU pressed the SSA to expedite the release of public records associated with DOGE’s work; a process permitted when documents are deemed urgent to inform the public about government activities at the center of significant public debate or concern. The organization cited, among its other materials, a letter from Senator Mark Warner detailing the unprecedented secrecy shrouding DOGE’s activities.
The SSA rejected the ACLU’s claim but then later ignored its attempts to file an appeal, the ACLU says—a procedure the SSA is required to abide by under FOIA. The VA was even less responsive, the ACLU alleges; it acknowledged the ACLU’s request in February then ceased any further communications.
“If DOGE is forcing its way into our private data, it is forcing itself into our private lives,” says Lauren Yu, one of the attorneys representing the ACLU in court. “Congress mandated strict privacy safeguards for a reason, and Americans deserve to know who has access to their social security numbers, their bank account information, and their health records … Government actors cannot continue to shroud themselves in secrecy while prying into our most sensitive records.”
The organization’s lawsuit is also informed, it says, by growing public concern over the ongoing push by DOGE to implement artificial intelligence (AI) systems, “which raises alarms about the potential for mass surveillance and politically motivated misuse of that deeply personal information.”
Earlier this month, WIRED reported that a DOGE operative was attempting to use an AI tool to implement code at the VA, which administers benefits to roughly 10 million American veterans and their families, including health care and disability payments. Sources at the agency voiced concerns about the rush to implement AI, saying the operation had failed to follow normal procedures and threatened to put US veterans’ access to the benefits they’d earned at risk.
“Granting DOGE access to VA data systems would not only violate federal law but it would undermine the very core of the VA mission to care for veterans, their families, caregivers, and survivors,” Michelle Fraling, the ACLU’s counsel, said in a statement.
WIRED reported last week that DOGE is knitting together data from the Social Security Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Internal Revenue Service that could create a surveillance tool of unprecedented scope. The ACLU’s initial records requests were prompted in part by concerns, its FOIA filings say, about the use of computer matching programs that are able to cross-reference information on individuals using disparate government databases.
The ability of the government to cross-reference personal information using databases from different agencies is tightly regulated under the US Privacy Act. The act was amended in 1988 to require agencies to enter into written agreements before engaging in computer matching, and agencies are required under the law to calculate how such initiatives might impact individuals’ rights.
“The federal government cannot dodge accountability by ignoring our lawful demands for transparency,” Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said in a statement.
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Academy Strands
The enforcer sat back, his posture perfect, almost too composed for the moment. He had the calm of someone who had long ago accepted their role in the machinery of the Republic. The dissident’s breath was shallow now, his mind reeling from the storm of information, the words slipping past him like water against a dam that was just starting to crack.

The intelligence enforcer continued, his voice clipped, precise, and utterly without compassion. "You see, there are two primary strands within every Academy. The first is for the cadets who are already aligned. They’ve been trained—whether through their upbringing, genetics, or choice—to follow the system. They are conditioned, but they don’t need the intensive reprogramming the others do. Those are the ones we look to for leadership positions, for intelligence work, for the higher echelons of the Republic’s structure."
The dissident’s eyes flickered briefly to the cadet beside him, K7L32, who stood silently, his face impassive, his posture rigid. The cadet seemed like a model soldier—focused, efficient, sharp. The dissident had once hoped for his son to be like that. He had long since realized that hope was a distant fantasy.

The enforcer slid another document across the table—a file on his son. “But then, there’s the other strand,” he said. “For those like your son. Those who resist. Those who are, to put it plainly, unwilling. Those who show disobedience, who demonstrate resistance to the system’s ideals. Those who are not naturally aligned with the Republic’s core values.”
The file flickered on the screen, showing images of his son at intake—fidgeting, restless, defiant, his body language full of rebellion. The psychological profile was disturbing: high marks for disobedience, resistance, and a remarkablerefusal to submit to authority.
“There it is,” the enforcer said, his tone as cold as the words he was reading. “This is the path your son was set on the moment he resisted. He’s a liability. He will never make it in the first strand. This is where we step in.”

The dissident felt his stomach churn, but the words kept coming, unrelenting, hammering him deeper into his sense of helplessness.
“And that’s lucky for him, really,” the enforcer continued, his lips curling into something approaching a smile. "Because there is another strand at every Academy, designed for those who need... more intensive care. For the brattyyouth, the disobedient, the unwilling, the rebellious. These are the ones we break, and once they’re broken, they are molded into loyal, obedient tools of the Republic. They often become Enforcer grunts, the backbone of our power, though it must be said—they’re not as... creative. Not as curious. Not as questioning. But they’re reliable. And that’s what matters, isn’t it?”
He motioned toward Cadet K7L32, who gave a faint, almost imperceptible smile, as if the words were a badge of honor. The older enforcer reached out and patted the cadet’s shaved head with a gauntlet-gloved hand, the gesture almost paternal, though it was anything but.
"Like K7L32 here," the enforcer said with a hint of pride. "He was once a lot like your son. Resistant. Unwilling. And now... now look at him. A model cadet. A product of our work."

K7L32’s smile lingered, and his eyes seemed to gleam with a certain emptiness, an unsettling satisfaction that spoke volumes more than his words ever could.
The dissident’s mind was reeling, unable to process the words fully. His son. Broken. Reprogrammed. Transformed into one of these... tools. His heart twisted in his chest, the agony of knowing that his son was no longer his son—but something else entirely, something unrecognizable.
The enforcer slid another screen across the table, and the dissident’s breath caught in his throat as he saw the images.
There was his son again, strapped tightly into a chair, his face pale, his eyes wide in terror. Electrodes were attached to his shaved skull, wires snaking down to an unseen machine. The headset rested on his head, the invasive technology that would reprogram his very mind. The images were distorted—flickering, grainy, as though the system was struggling to fully process the horror—but the signs were clear. His son was in agony.

The dissident’s hands shook as he leaned forward, trying to make sense of the images. His son’s body twitched violently, his muscles spasming under the weight of whatever force was being applied to him. There was a moment where the boy’s face contorted in pain, his mouth open in a silent scream, before the feed cut to black for a brief second, only to return with his son’s body completely still—his eyes wide, vacant.
The enforcer’s voice sliced through the growing silence.
“That,” he said, his tone clinical, almost matter-of-fact, “is the experience of every cadet who ends up in this strand. The drill instructors, the mind techs, the VR-based neuro-conditioning. We use every method at our disposal. Drugs, simulation, sensory overload. Anything that breaks the resistance. We tear down their old self, and then, when they’re empty, we fill them with the ideals of the Republic. No more disobedience. No more resistance. Just loyalty. Absolute loyalty.”

The dissident’s throat tightened, the tears stinging at the corners of his eyes, but he forced them back, forcing himself to remain numb to the nightmare unfolding before him. This was his fault. It had been his decision to sign the papers, his failure to protect his son from this hell.
"Your son is going through this right now," the enforcer continued, his voice almost casual, as though discussing the weather. "Because you signed the papers. He’s being transformed into someone who will serve the Republic without question. Someone who will follow orders. Someone who will never doubt again.”
The enforcer let the silence hang in the air for a long moment before adding with a slight tilt of his head, “And it’s all because you signed the papers.”
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
Canada’s new bill—The Strong Borders Act—proposes a sweeping shift in immigration that, among other items, expands the Canadian Coast Guard’s authority to conduct security patrols, restricts asylum access, and attempts to deal with the flow of fentanyl into the country.
“The Bill will strengthen our laws and keep Canadians safe by ensuring law enforcement has the right tools to keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of illegal fentanyl, and crack down on money laundering,” the bill states.
Introduced on June 3 by Canada’s Minister of Public Safety, Gary Anandasangaree, the 127-page measure proposes a shift in how the government interacts with the U.S.-Canada border.
The bill comes after President Donald Trump voiced concerns about what he referred to as cross-border fentanyl traffic and irregular migration, when he imposed tariffs on Canada during his Feb. 1 Executive Order titled “Imposing Duties to Address the Flow of Illicit Drugs Across Our Northern Border.” Trump argued that “Canada has played a central role” in the “challenges” against “illicit drugs” entering the country, alleging there is “a growing presence of Mexican cartels operating fentanyl and nitazene synthesis labs in Canada” and that Canada must “do more to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept DTOs, other drug and human traffickers, criminals at large, and drugs.”
Here’s what you need to know about Canada’s Strong Borders Act.
What is in Canada's immigration bill?
Canada’s new immigration bill seeks to impact various areas—from asylum rules to search and seizure, to giving police more power to control and monitor the U.S. border.
The new bill would allow Canada Post’s inspection authority to open mail and would also remove barriers to allow law enforcement to open mail during an investigation—attempting to curb fentanyl movement by what authorities say is performed by organized crime groups. It would expand the power of the Canadian Coast Guard to “conduct security patrols and collect, analyze and share information and intelligence for security purposes,” by amending the Oceans Act, creating a new role for the department. It also would expand the ability for Canadian intelligence agencies to share information with U.S. intelligence.
Related to organized crime, the bill proposes additional restrictions on transactions over $10,000 and cash deposits by any one individual into another's account.
The process of gaining access to asylum would also change, as the bill looks to bar asylum seekers who have been in the country for over a year, retroactively applying to anyone who arrived after June 24, 2020.
It would further allow the government the ability to pause the acceptance of new applications and “cancel, suspend, or change immigration documents” immediately.
Why is the bill facing backlash?
The proposal has been met with strong opposition from immigration and human rights advocates in Canada, who argue it could restrict civil liberties and violate international refugee obligations.
Jenny Wai Ching Kwan, a Canadian politician who serves at the member of Parliament for Vancouver East, issued a warning about the measure, stating that it should be “alarming” to Canadians.
“Looking at [the bill], particularly with respect to the immigration provisions, it is very concerning to me that the government will now be breaching, I think, people's civil liberties, I think violating people's due process and taking away people's basic rights right now,” Kwan told reporters. “What we're looking at is the government giving broad, sweeping authority within the government to cancel applications, to withdraw applications, to suspend applications, even those that are already in the inventory that is under process.”
She also shared concerns about citizens’ privacy, and the lack of apparent appeals processes in relation to the new sweeping immigration law.
Canadian migrant justice group Migrant Rights Network also “condemns” the bill, stating that it would “drastically restrict refugee protections and allow for mass deportations and immigration exclusion.” They argue that the “unchecked power” enabled through this bill could allow for migrant groups to have their immigration status revoked “en masse.”
“Prime Minister [Mark] Carney campaigned on being different from Donald Trump, yet his very first bill is a shameful capitulation to racism and xenophobia, which abandons Canada’s legal and moral obligations to refugees and migrants,” said Migrant Rights Network spokesperson Syed Hussan in a statement. “With over 3,000 study and work permits already expiring daily because of [Former Prime Minister Justin] Trudeau’s immigration cuts, this Bill will only worsen a humanitarian catastrophe. This bill is immoral, it is illegal, and it will be stopped.”
Speaking with reporters on Friday, Canadian Council of Refugees co-executive director Gauri Sreenivasan stated that the bill mirrors U.S. immigration policy and could “force many people who have no choice because they are under threat in their country or in the U.S. to live underground without status.”
Kelly Sundberg, a former officer with the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), also spoke out against the bill, admitting they’re “not optimistic” about it.
“I think all [the bill] does is try to appease the Trump Administration. But I'd like to see legislation that's designed to keep Canadians safe,” Sundberg said during an interview with CTV News. “So does this legislation improve our border security, improve our immigration integrity, and improve the public safety of Canadians? No, it does not. It doesn't even come close.”
Anandasangaree was asked whether the immigration bill appeases the U.S. government during a press conference.
“These measures are being taken for a number of reasons. First and foremost, Canadians elected a new government on April the 28th with a mandate to ensure the safety and security of Canadians, including securing our border,” Anandasangaree responded. “Of course, there's elements that will strengthen the relationship with the United States. There are a number of elements in the bill that have been irritants for the U.S.”
David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, says it’s not surprising that Canada is "moving more in the direction of the American immigration system."
“[Canada is] enhancing the power of the executive in many respects, to deny people asylum, to suspend processing of applications, limiting the right of people to to request asylum,” he says. “These are all things that I've been part of U.S. law for a long time.”
Still, according to Bier, this bill is more about "domestic politics than international relations."
Sharry Aikan, a law professor at Queen's University, is also apprehensive about the bill. Its intent to address concerns with a broken immigration system lies in the right place, she says—but its execution is wrong.
“This is a legislative fix for a set of challenges that should have been addressed through operational measures, not new laws,” Aikan says. “We need to make sure that when people show up at the border, you know that we have the resources to address them. Yes, 100%. But why dismantle what is in effect?”
Aikan argues in particular against the one year deadline for asylum claims—something she says is a direct mirror of the U.S.’s one-year policy. She provides multiple examples—including one where a foreign national comes to Canada, and year two of their stay in Canada, the circumstances in their home country change and it is no longer safe to return.
“It's basically shutting off the pipeline to the hearing altogether and saying, the mere fact that you've been in a country for 12 months and two days means that you don't have access to a full fledged refugee hearing,” Aikan says. “What it signals about the priorities of the government is that appeasing the White House right now is a number one concern.”
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Discover How Healthcare Automation is Revolutionizing Patient Care Across the Globe!
Tired of paperwork and slow processes in healthcare? Dive into our latest blog to see how cutting-edge automation is transforming patient care and hospital operations worldwide. From AI-powered scheduling at Mayo Clinic to remote monitoring at Apollo Hospitals, real-world success stories show how smart technology is freeing up doctors, reducing errors, and improving patient outcomes.
Whether you’re a healthcare leader, tech enthusiast, or just curious about the future of medicine, this guide reveals how automation is making healthcare faster, safer, and more personal—no matter where you are in the world.
0 notes
Text
Extracting data from purchase orders can be a tedious and error-prone process, especially when dealing with a high volume of documents. Manual extraction methods are often inefficient and costly.
However, with AlgoDocs Purchase Order AI OCR app, you can seamlessly automate this process. Our advanced technology accurately extracts essential details such as purchase order numbers, dates, item descriptions, shipping addresses, costs, and more. This automation saves you valuable time and resources, allowing you to focus on other critical tasks. To learn more about how AlgoDocs can revolutionize your purchase order data extraction with AI, read our comprehensive guide.
#ocr#algodocs#ocralgorithms#ai tools#dataextraction#purchase order software#idp#Intelligent Document Processing#pdfconversion
0 notes
Note
Hi! You mentioned there are online tutorials/sites for learning Comp Sci and OSINT - any recommendations? Thanks!
Hi! You got lucky that today is the day I check my inbox lol. So. For comp-sci: - CS50X from Harvard is a public avaiable course on youtube I'd 100% recommend. These are the undedited (so far) lectures of 2024: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LPJfIKxwWc&list=PLhQjrBD2T381WAHyx1pq-sBfykqMBI7V4&ab_channel=CS50
This gives you all the basics you need to understand how coding and pcs in general works. (I had comp sci in my university course)
- Freecodecamp is a website full of FREE tutorials on several programming language. Advice: learn python. You will understand later on.
- The rest really depends on what you actually want to learn and why - each programming language has its own purpose and application. OSINT: -There is this full course: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwA6MmbeGNo&t=205s&ab_channel=TheCyberMentor (But you can find more on youtube.) - Bellingcat's resources: https://www.bellingcat.com/category/resources/ -IntelTecniques: https://inteltechniques.com/ - Osint Newesletter: https://osintnewsletter.com/
But here is the catcher: if you plan to do osint it heavily depends on where you live. I'm in Europe, so it means I'm under GDPR, therefore I must abid to stricter regulations than a US OSINT analyst. A lot of data that might be considered public domain in the US(big one: conviction records) are not in europe, and you won't be able to access it unless you are a registered private investigator at least (but in my case it's rare that I go after people, that's not a part of any task I might encounter at work). Not only that, but a lot of the avaiable tools are designed to work only with specific countries in mind for various reasons and there is a big bias on US-based investigations. If youre' not in the US I recommend you reach out to your local OSINT or cybersecurity professionals association, they usually have resources and specific information, a lot of times for free. Also keep in mind: OSINT has a lot of different applications and it depends on what you're doing with it. Journalists might work more with satellites and images (a thing I know nothing about), debunkers will definitely understand social media more, if you do business intelligence you will look more at news sites, trademarks and deposits and so on to reach your conclusion. You did your course... Now what? I recommend getting on CTFs, like tracelabs that I've linked above, but there many of them (osint dojo for example) or Kase Scenarios. These are safe environments to practice on (except for tracelabs since it deal with actual cases of missing people and it can lead to... not so good leads, allow me to leave it there) You should also understand how intelligence (as the discipline) works. There are several resources, but my favourite is definitely Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. It's a series of declassified training documents from CIA analyst Richard Bauer, that was based on Daniel Kahneman (yes, the "thinking fast and slow" author, and I also do recommend this book) research on euristics. Intelligence is fundamental because OSINT might be helpful to gather the data, but the data then needs to be processed, analysed and you also need to get a conclusion from that analysis. Studying intelligence will help you avoid a lot of pitfalls that happens when you do an investigation, such as not understanding when you know enough, if you're being a victim of your own bias, if you're missing something or if you're going with the right approach. But I have to admit that the best of training I've received so far is from my local OSINT association because I've been able to train with people that work(ed) in the military, get their advice and have a deep understand of the work itself (and the reason why I have decided to actually make cyber threat intelligence my job, even if I work for a private company and I have no interest in working for the government). And yes ethics is a big thing for the OSINT community.
I hope this is helpful enough!
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
Integrated ZATCA Phase 2 Software
Optimize your Logistics operations with Integrated ZATCA Phase 2 Software. Our Freight management software delivers excellence through intelligent automation, real-time tracking, and comprehensive analytics.
What is Bridge LCS?
Bridge LCS is a powerful logistics software that has gained the trust of businesses in Saudi Arabia. But what exactly is Bridge LCS? In simple terms, it is a comprehensive solution designed to streamline and optimize logistics operations.
With Bridge LCS, you can efficiently manage your inventory, track real-time shipments, and effectively collaborate with suppliers and customers. The software provides all the tools to handle every aspect of logistics seamlessly.
One of the critical features of Bridge LCS is its live shipment tracking software. This allows you to monitor the progress of your shipments at any given time. With this feature, you can quickly identify potential delays or issues and take proactive measures to ensure timely delivery.
Another important feature offered by Bridge LCS is its air cargo management software. This enables you to efficiently handle air freight operations, from booking flights to managing customs clearance procedures. With this software, you can effortlessly navigate complex international regulations and ensure the smooth transportation of goods via air.
Why Choose Bridge LCS?
When it comes to choosing software for logistics, there are many options available in the market. However, one name stands out among the rest – Bridge LCS. With its cutting-edge technology and innovative features, Bridge LCS is the go-to choice for businesses to streamline their logistics operations.
One of the key reasons why you should choose Bridge LCS is its live shipment tracking software. Say goodbye to lost or delayed shipments – with Bridge LCS; you can stay updated on every step of the way.
But that’s not all – Bridge LCS also offers a range of other impressive features, such as inventory management, warehouse management, and transportation management systems. These tools work together seamlessly to optimize logistics processes and improve overall productivity.
In addition to its advanced features, Bridge LCS’s reputation for reliability and trustworthiness is what sets it apart from its competitors. With a solid track record in serving clients across various industries in Saudi Arabia, you can be confident that this software will meet your needs and requirements.
So why choose anything less when you can have the best? Choose Bridge LCS today and experience how it can revolutionize your logistics operations.
How Bridge LCS Can Benefit Your Business
Bridge LCS is a powerful software solution designed specifically for the logistics industry in Saudi Arabia. Its comprehensive features and user-friendly interface offer numerous benefits that significantly enhance your business operations.
One of the key advantages of using Bridge LCS is its live shipment tracking software. This feature lets you track your shipments in real-time, providing accurate information on their location and status. This not only helps you stay updated on the progress of your deliveries but also enables you to provide timely updates to your customers.
Another valuable feature of Bridge LCS is its air cargo management software. This feature streamlines managing air freight by automating booking, documentation, and billing tasks. By simplifying these processes, it helps improve efficiency and reduces errors, saving both time and money for your business. Read more...
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Meta just lost a major fight in its ongoing legal battle with a group of authors suing the company for copyright infringement over how it trained its artificial intelligence models. Against the company’s wishes, a court unredacted information alleging that Meta used Library Genesis (LibGen), a notorious so-called shadow library of pirated books that originated in Russia, to help train its generative AI language models.
The case, Kadrey et al. v. Meta Platforms, was one of the earliest copyright lawsuits filed against a tech company over its AI training practices. Its outcome, along with those of dozens of similar cases working their way through courts in the United States, will determine whether technology companies can legally use creative works to train AI moving forward and could either entrench AI’s most powerful players or derail them.
Vince Chhabria, a judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, ordered both Meta and the plaintiffs on Wednesday to file full versions of a batch of documents after calling Meta’s approach to redacting them “preposterous,” adding that, for the most part, "there is not a single thing in those briefs that should be sealed.” Chhabria ruled that Meta was not pushing to redact the materials in order to protect its business interests but instead to “avoid negative publicity.” The documents were originally filed late last year remained publicly unavailable in unredacted form until now.
In his order, Chhabria referenced an internal quote from a Meta employee, included in the documents, in which they speculated, “If there is media coverage suggesting we have used a dataset we know to be pirated, such as LibGen, this may undermine our negotiating position with regulators on these issues.” Meta declined to comment.
Novelists Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden, along with comedian Sarah Silverman, first filed the class-action lawsuit against Meta in July 2023, alleging the tech giant trained its language models using their copyrighted work without permission. Meta has argued that using publicly available materials to train AI tools is shielded by the “fair use” doctrine, which holds that using copyrighted works without permission is legal in certain cases, one of which, the company argues, is “using text to statistically model language and generate original expression,” the company’s lawyers wrote in a motion to dismiss the authors’ lawsuit in November 2023. In this particular lawsuit, Meta has also argued that the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit.
Before these documents were made public, Meta previously disclosed in a research paper that it had trained its Llama large language model on portions of Books3, a dataset of around 196,000 books scraped from the internet. It had not previously publicly indicated, however, that it had torrented data directly from LibGen.
These newly unredacted documents reveal exchanges between Meta employees unearthed in the discovery process, like a Meta engineer telling a colleague that they hesitated to access LibGen data because “torrenting from a [Meta-owned] corporate laptop doesn’t feel right 😃”. They also allege that internal discussions about using LibGen data were escalated to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg (referred to as "MZ" in the memo handed over during discovery) and that Meta's AI team was "approved to use" the pirated material.
“Meta has treated the so-called ‘public availability’ of shadow datasets as a get-out-of-jail-free card, notwithstanding that internal Meta records show every relevant decision-maker at Meta, up to and including its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, knew LibGen was ‘a dataset we know to be pirated,’” the plaintiffs allege in this motion. (Originally filed in late 2024, the motion is a request to file a third amended complaint.)
In addition to the plaintiffs’ briefs, another filing was unredacted in response to Chhabria’s order—Meta’s opposition to the motion to file an amended complaint. It argues that the authors’ attempts to add additional claims to the case are an “eleventh-hour gambit based on a false and inflammatory premise” and denies that Meta waited to reveal crucial information in discovery. Instead, Meta argues it first revealed to the plaintiffs that it used a LibGen dataset in July 2024. (Because much of the discovery materials remain confidential, it is difficult for WIRED to confirm that claim.)
Meta’s argument hinges on its claim that the plaintiffs already knew about the LibGen use and shouldn’t be granted additional time to file a third amended claim when they had ample time to do so before discovery ended in December 2024. “Plaintiffs knew of Meta’s downloading and use of LibGen and other alleged ‘shadow libraries’ since at least mid-July 2024,” the tech giant’s lawyers argue.
In November 2023, Chhabria granted Meta’s motion to dismiss some of the lawsuit’s claims, including its claim Meta’s alleged use of the authors’ work to train AI violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a US law introduced in 1998 to stop people from selling or duplicating copyrighted works on the internet. At the time, the judge agreed with Meta’s stance that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to prove that the company had removed what’s known as “copyright management information,” like the author’s name and title of the work.
The unredacted documents argue that the plaintiffs should be allowed to amend their complaint, alleging that the information Meta revealed is evidence that the DMCA claim was warranted. They also say the discovery process has unearthed reasons to add new allegations. “Meta, through a corporate representative who testified on November 20, 2024, has now admitted under oath to uploading (aka ‘seeding’) pirated files containing Plaintiffs’ works on ‘torrent’ sites,” the motion alleges. (Seeding is when torrented files are then shared with other peers after they have finished downloading.)
“This torrenting activity turned Meta itself into a distributor of the very same pirated copyrighted material that it was also downloading for use in its commercially available AI models,” one of the newly unredacted documents claims, alleging that Meta, in other words, had not just used copyrighted material without permission but also disseminated it.
LibGen, an archive of books uploaded to the internet that originated in Russia around 2008, is one of the largest and most controversial “shadow libraries” in the world. In 2015, a New York judge ordered a preliminary injunction against the site, a measure designed in theory to temporarily shut the archive down, but its anonymous administrators simply switched its domain. In September 2024, a different New York judge ordered LibGen to pay $30 million to the rights holders for infringing on their copyrights, despite not knowing who actually operates the piracy hub.
Meta’s discovery woes for this case aren’t over, either. In the same order, Chhabria warned the tech giant against any overly sweeping redaction requests in the future: “If Meta again submits an unreasonably broad sealing request, all materials will simply be unsealed,” he wrote.
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Shocking Trends in Technology and Gadgets
Technology is advancing at an unprecedented pace, transforming not only our methods of communication but also our lifestyles, work habits, and thought processes. The year 2025 is set to be a pivotal moment in the development of gadgets and innovations that influence everyday life. From artificial intelligence and smart wearables to groundbreaking advancements in energy and computing, each innovation is redefining our expectations. What was once considered science fiction is now a reality and frequently integrated into our daily routines. As we anticipate a more interconnected, efficient, and immersive world, the latest trends illustrate a profound integration of technology with human experience.

These transformations extend well beyond merely new smartphone models or sleeker laptops. We are discussing trends that impact health, sustainability, communication, education, and even our experiences with entertainment. This article delves into the most significant and surprising trends in technology and gadgets as they unfold in 2025. Each segment examines how these advancements will influence various industries and what implications they hold for consumers and businesses alike.
For more details visit this
Whether you are a technology enthusiast, a professional in the industry, or simply an interested observer, grasping these forthcoming innovations is crucial. They are poised not only to change how we engage with the world but also to provide insights into the future direction of society. Prepare to discover twenty revolutionary trends that you cannot afford to miss.
II. The Ascendancy of Artificial Intelligence in Daily Life
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transitioned from a specialized concept limited to researchers and engineers. By 2025, AI is becoming an integral aspect of everyday life, seamlessly woven into our daily activities. Smart assistants have evolved far beyond basic voice commands. They now provide proactive suggestions based on our habits, preferences, and surroundings.
Smartphones continue to be central to our digital lives, and 2025 brings some jaw-dropping innovations. Foldable and rollable displays are now mainstream, offering larger screens without increasing device size. These form factors enhance multitasking, gaming, and content consumption.
AI-powered cameras automatically adjust settings to capture professional-grade photos, recognize documents, and even analyze skin conditions. Battery life has also seen significant improvement thanks to more efficient processors and smarter power management systems.
Biometric enhancements such as under-display fingerprint sensors and facial mapping improve security. Additionally, smartphones now function as hubs for controlling other smart devices, from thermostats to vehicles.
With the integration of satellite connectivity, even remote areas enjoy reliable communication. These upgrades reflect a move toward devices that are not just tools but essential companions in managing digital and real-world tasks.
XI. Rise of the Metaverse
The metaverse has matured from hype to reality. In 2025, it’s a dynamic space for work, play, and socialization. Powered by VR and blockchain, the metaverse offers immersive experiences where users interact with digital environments and avatars.
Social media platforms are integrating metaverse elements, allowing users to attend concerts, business meetings, or even classrooms in virtual spaces. Commerce is thriving through virtual storefronts, where users can shop using cryptocurrency or NFTs.
Hardware advancements like lightweight VR headsets and motion-tracking wearables enhance immersion. Meanwhile, developers focus on interoperability, enabling avatars and assets to move seamlessly across platforms.
Whether it's remote work or digital tourism, the metaverse is reshaping how we connect and collaborate online.
XII. Smart Transportation and Electric Vehicles
Transportation is undergoing a revolution driven by electrification and automation. In 2025, electric vehicles (EVs) are more affordable and widespread, thanks to advances in battery technology and government incentives. EVs offer longer ranges, faster charging, and smart integration with home energy systems.
Self-driving car technology is progressing as well. Autonomous features like lane assist, adaptive cruise control, and automated parking are common. Ride-sharing companies are also piloting robo-taxis in urban centers.
Beyond cars, smart transportation includes connected bicycles, e-scooters, and drones. These innovations contribute to cleaner cities and more efficient travel.
Public transit is also getting smarter with real-time tracking, predictive maintenance, and eco-friendly buses. Together, these trends create a more sustainable and intelligent transportation ecosystem.
2 notes
·
View notes