#InternalServerError

[rsthemewp]

14 Most Common WordPress Errors and How to Resolve Them

[magecomp]

Hello Magento Friends,

Magento 2 500 internal server error is most common error occurs while installing, upgrading, or removing Magento components like themes, plugins, patches, etc. Today I am here with different solution on How to fix Magento 2 500 internal server error.

[aliarior]

500 internal Server Hatası ve Çözümü hakkındaki yazıma bu sayfadan ulaşabilirsiniz. Diğer faydalı yazılarım için sitemi ziyaret edebilirsiniz. Devamı için : https://www.aliarior.com/500-internal-server-hatasi-ve-cozumu/ #wordpress #wordpresssorunları #wordpresshataları #business #blog #blogger #blogmistake #internalservererror #sunucuhataları #500internalserverhatası #500internalserverhatasıçözümü #eklentihataları #temahataları #wordpressgüncelsorunlar

[phelixinfosolution]

Fix the 500 Internal Server Error Very Easy in WordPress Site

Fix the 500 Internal Server Error: Guide to assist you to fix error 500 internal server error in WordPress web site. conjointly discuss varied strategies to assist you simply counter and fix these errors.

https://phelixinfosolutions.com/blog/fix-the-500-internal-server-error/

Read the full article

[randomfunnypic]

[wordpressrecoverpassword-blog]

Fixing the 500 Internal Server Error in WordPress Call Now Wordpress Expert at 800-556-3577 for free help

#WordPress #500Error #InternalServerError #Wordpress.com #Wordpress.org

[ustribunenews-blog]

Breaking The Old 52 Week Low, Kroger Co (NYSE:KR) Finishing At $23.53

Breaking The Old 52 Week Low, Kroger Co (NYSE:KR) Finishing At $23.53

Kroger Co (NYSE:KR)

May 23rd, 2019

Amidst falling markets Kroger Co fell ($0.47) Thursday, down 1.96%, closing at $23.53. As well as the drop in value, Kroger Co hit a new 52 week low of $23.43, breaking the previous low of $23.52 from earlier this January. (more…)

[williamsefton]

Easier functional and integration testing of ASP.NET Core applications

In ASP.NET 2.1 (now in preview) there's apparently a new package called Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing that's meant to help streamline in-memory end-to-end testing of applications that use the MVC pattern. I've been re-writing my podcast site at https://hanselminutes.com in ASP.NET Core 2.1 lately, and recently added some unit testing and automatic unit testing with code coverage. Here's a couple of basic tests. Note that these call the Razor Pages directly and call their OnGet() methods directly. This shows how ASP.NET Core is nicely factored for Unit Testing but it doesn't do a "real" HTTP GET or perform true end-to-end testing.

These tests are testing if visiting URLs like /620 will automatically redirect to the correct full canonical path as they should.

[Fact] public async void ShowDetailsPageIncompleteTitleUrlTest() { // FAKE HTTP GET "/620" IActionResult result = await pageModel.OnGetAsync(id:620, path:""); RedirectResult r = Assert.IsType<RedirectResult>(result); Assert.NotNull(r); Assert.True(r.Permanent); //HTTP 301? Assert.Equal("/620/jessica-rose-and-the-worst-advice-ever",r.Url); } [Fact] public async void SuperOldShowTest() { // FAKE HTTP GET "/default.aspx?showId=18602" IActionResult result = await pageModel.OnGetOldShowId(18602); RedirectResult r = Assert.IsType<RedirectResult>(result); Assert.NotNull(r); Assert.True(r.Permanent); //HTTP 301? Assert.StartsWith("/615/developing-on-not-for-a-nokia-feature",r.Url); }

I wanted to see how quickly and easily I could do these same two tests, except "from the outside" with an HTTP GET, thereby testing more of the stack.

I added a reference to Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing in my testing assembly using the command-line equivalanet of "Right Click | Add NuGet Package" in Visual Studio. This CLI command does the same thing as the UI and adds the package to the csproj file.

dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing -v 2.1.0-preview1-final

It includes a new WebApplicationTestFixture that I point to my app's Startup class. Note that I can take store the HttpClient the TestFixture makes for me.

public class TestingMvcFunctionalTests : IClassFixture<WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup>> { public HttpClient Client { get; } public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.Client; } }

No tests yet, just setup. I'm using SSL redirection so I'll make sure the client knows that, and add a test:

public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.Client; Client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://localhost"); } [Fact] public async Task GetHomePage() { // Arrange & Act var response = await Client.GetAsync("/"); // Assert Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.OK, response.StatusCode); }

This will fail, in fact. Because I have an API Key that is needed to call out to my backend system, and I store it in .NET's User Secrets system. My test will get an InternalServerError instead of OK.

Starting test execution, please wait... [xUnit.net 00:00:01.2110048] Discovering: hanselminutes.core.tests [xUnit.net 00:00:01.2690390] Discovered: hanselminutes.core.tests [xUnit.net 00:00:01.2749018] Starting: hanselminutes.core.tests [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1088832] hanselminutes_core_tests.TestingMvcFunctionalTests.GetHomePage [FAIL] [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1102884] Assert.Equal() Failure [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1103719] Expected: OK [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1104377] Actual: InternalServerError [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1114432] Stack Trace: [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1124268] D:\github\hanselminutes-core\hanselminutes.core.tests\FunctionalTests.cs(29,0): at hanselminutes_core_tests.TestingMvcFunctionalTests.<GetHomePage>d__4.MoveNext() [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1126872] --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1158250] Finished: hanselminutes.core.tests Failed hanselminutes_core_tests.TestingMvcFunctionalTests.GetHomePage Error Message: Assert.Equal() Failure Expected: OK Actual: InternalServerError

Where do these secrets come from? In Development they come from user secrets.

public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env) { this.env = env; var builder = new ConfigurationBuilder(); if (env.IsDevelopment()) { builder.AddUserSecrets<Startup>(); } Configuration = builder.Build(); }

But in Production they come from the ENVIRONMENT. Are these tests Development or Production...I must ask myself.  They are Production unless told otherwise. I can override the Fixture and tell it to use another Environment, like "Development." Here is a way (given this preview) to make my own TestFixture by deriving and grabbing and override to change the Environment. I think it's too hard and should be easier.

Either way, the real question here is for me - do I want my tests to be integration tests in development or in "production." Likely I need to make a new environment for myself - "testing."

public class MyOwnTextFixture<TStartup> : WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup> where TStartup : class { public MyOwnTextFixture() { } protected override void ConfigureWebHost(IWebHostBuilder builder) { builder.UseEnvironment("Development"); } }

However, my User Secrets still aren't loading, and that's where the API Key is that I need.

BUG?: There is either a bug here, or I don't know what I'm doing. I'm loading User Secrets in builder.AddUserSecrets<Startup> and later injecting the IConfiguration instance from builder.Build() and going "_apiKey = config["SimpleCastAPIKey"];" but it's null. The config that's injected later in the app isn't the same one that's created in Startup.cs. It's empty. Not sure if this is an ASP.NE Core 2.0 thing or 2.1 thing but I'm going to bring it up with the team and update this blog post later. It might be a Razor Pages subtlety I'm missing. For now, I'm going to put in a check and manually fix up my Config. However, when this is fixed (or I discover my error) this whole thing will be a pretty nice little set up for integration testing.

I will add another test, similar to the redirect Unit Test but a fuller integration test that actually uses HTTP and tests the result.

[Fact] public async Task GetAShow() { // Arrange & Act var response = await Client.GetAsync("/620"); // Assert Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.MovedPermanently, response.StatusCode); Assert.Equal("/620/jessica-rose-and-the-worst-advice-ever",response.Headers.Location.ToString()); }

There's another issue here that I don't understand. Because have to set Client.BaseAddress to https://localhost (because https) and the Client is passed into fixture.Client, I can't set the Base address twice or I'll get an exception, as the Test's Constructor runs twice, but the HttpClient that's passed in as a lifecycler that's longer. It's being reused, and it fails when setting its BaseAddress twice.

Error Message: System.InvalidOperationException : This instance has already started one or more requests. Properties can only be modified before sending the first request.

BUG? So to work around it I check to see if I've done it before. Which is gross. I want to set the BaseAddress once, but I am not in charge of the creation of this HttpClient as it's passed in by the Fixture.

public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(MyOwnTextFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.Client; if (Client.BaseAddress.ToString().StartsWith("https://") == false) Client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://localhost"); }

Another option is that I create a new client every time, which is less efficient and perhaps a better idea as it avoids any side effects from other tests, but also feels weird that I should have to do this, as the new standard for ASP.NET Core sites is to be SSL/HTTPS by default..

public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(MyOwnTextFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.CreateClient(new Uri(https://localhost)); }

I'm still learning about how it all fits together, but later I plan to add in Selenium tests to have a full, complete, test suite that includes the browser, CSS, JavaScript, end-to-end integration tests, and unit tests.

Let me know if you think I'm doing something wrong. This is preview stuff, so it's early days!

Sponsor: Get the latest JetBrains Rider for debugging third-party .NET code, Smart Step Into, more debugger improvements, C# Interactive, new project wizard, and formatting code in columns.

© 2018 Scott Hanselman. All rights reserved.

      from Scott Hanselman's Blog http://feeds.hanselman.com/~/536365756/0/scotthanselman~Easier-functional-and-integration-testing-of-ASPNET-Core-applications.aspx

[digitalwebservices]

👩‍💻#Tech_Update: Discover the ultimate guide to fixing Internal Server Errors! 🚀 Check out this comprehensive article at this post for expert tips and step-by-step solutions. Say goodbye to pesky errors and hello to seamless browsing!

[russellarmstrong1]

Easier functional and integration testing of ASP.NET Core applications

In ASP.NET 2.1 (now in preview) there's apparently a new package called Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing that's meant to help streamline in-memory end-to-end testing of applications that use the MVC pattern. I've been re-writing my podcast site at https://hanselminutes.com in ASP.NET Core 2.1 lately, and recently added some unit testing and automatic unit testing with code coverage. Here's a couple of basic tests. Note that these call the Razor Pages directly and call their OnGet() methods directly. This shows how ASP.NET Core is nicely factored for Unit Testing but it doesn't do a "real" HTTP GET or perform true end-to-end testing.

These tests are testing if visiting URLs like /620 will automatically redirect to the correct full canonical path as they should.

[Fact] public async void ShowDetailsPageIncompleteTitleUrlTest() { // FAKE HTTP GET "/620" IActionResult result = await pageModel.OnGetAsync(id:620, path:""); RedirectResult r = Assert.IsType<RedirectResult>(result); Assert.NotNull(r); Assert.True(r.Permanent); //HTTP 301? Assert.Equal("/620/jessica-rose-and-the-worst-advice-ever",r.Url); } [Fact] public async void SuperOldShowTest() { // FAKE HTTP GET "/default.aspx?showId=18602" IActionResult result = await pageModel.OnGetOldShowId(18602); RedirectResult r = Assert.IsType<RedirectResult>(result); Assert.NotNull(r); Assert.True(r.Permanent); //HTTP 301? Assert.StartsWith("/615/developing-on-not-for-a-nokia-feature",r.Url); }

I wanted to see how quickly and easily I could do these same two tests, except "from the outside" with an HTTP GET, thereby testing more of the stack.

I added a reference to Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing in my testing assembly using the command-line equivalanet of "Right Click | Add NuGet Package" in Visual Studio. This CLI command does the same thing as the UI and adds the package to the csproj file.

dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing -v 2.1.0-preview1-final

It includes a new WebApplicationTestFixture that I point to my app's Startup class. Note that I can take store the HttpClient the TestFixture makes for me.

public class TestingMvcFunctionalTests : IClassFixture<WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup>> { public HttpClient Client { get; } public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.Client; } }

No tests yet, just setup. I'm using SSL redirection so I'll make sure the client knows that, and add a test:

public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.Client; Client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://localhost"); } [Fact] public async Task GetHomePage() { // Arrange & Act var response = await Client.GetAsync("/"); // Assert Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.OK, response.StatusCode); }

This will fail, in fact. Because I have an API Key that is needed to call out to my backend system, and I store it in .NET's User Secrets system. My test will get an InternalServerError instead of OK.

Starting test execution, please wait... [xUnit.net 00:00:01.2110048] Discovering: hanselminutes.core.tests [xUnit.net 00:00:01.2690390] Discovered: hanselminutes.core.tests [xUnit.net 00:00:01.2749018] Starting: hanselminutes.core.tests [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1088832] hanselminutes_core_tests.TestingMvcFunctionalTests.GetHomePage [FAIL] [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1102884] Assert.Equal() Failure [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1103719] Expected: OK [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1104377] Actual: InternalServerError [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1114432] Stack Trace: [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1124268] D:\github\hanselminutes-core\hanselminutes.core.tests\FunctionalTests.cs(29,0): at hanselminutes_core_tests.TestingMvcFunctionalTests.<GetHomePage>d__4.MoveNext() [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1126872] --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- [xUnit.net 00:00:08.1158250] Finished: hanselminutes.core.tests Failed hanselminutes_core_tests.TestingMvcFunctionalTests.GetHomePage Error Message: Assert.Equal() Failure Expected: OK Actual: InternalServerError

Where do these secrets come from? In Development they come from user secrets.

public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env) { this.env = env; var builder = new ConfigurationBuilder(); if (env.IsDevelopment()) { builder.AddUserSecrets<Startup>(); } Configuration = builder.Build(); }

But in Production they come from the ENVIRONMENT. Are these tests Development or Production...I must ask myself.  They are Production unless told otherwise. I can override the Fixture and tell it to use another Environment, like "Development." Here is a way (given this preview) to make my own TestFixture by deriving and grabbing and override to change the Environment. I think it's too hard and should be easier.

Either way, the real question here is for me - do I want my tests to be integration tests in development or in "production." Likely I need to make a new environment for myself - "testing."

public class MyOwnTextFixture<TStartup> : WebApplicationTestFixture<Startup> where TStartup : class { public MyOwnTextFixture() { } protected override void ConfigureWebHost(IWebHostBuilder builder) { builder.UseEnvironment("Development"); } }

However, my User Secrets still aren't loading, and that's where the API Key is that I need.

BUG?: There is either a bug here, or I don't know what I'm doing. I'm loading User Secrets in builder.AddUserSecrets<Startup> and later injecting the IConfiguration instance from builder.Build() and going "_apiKey = config["SimpleCastAPIKey"];" but it's null. The config that's injected later in the app isn't the same one that's created in Startup.cs. It's empty. Not sure if this is an ASP.NE Core 2.0 thing or 2.1 thing but I'm going to bring it up with the team and update this blog post later. It might be a Razor Pages subtlety I'm missing. For now, I'm going to put in a check and manually fix up my Config. However, when this is fixed (or I discover my error) this whole thing will be a pretty nice little set up for integration testing.

I will add another test, similar to the redirect Unit Test but a fuller integration test that actually uses HTTP and tests the result.

[Fact] public async Task GetAShow() { // Arrange & Act var response = await Client.GetAsync("/620"); // Assert Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.MovedPermanently, response.StatusCode); Assert.Equal("/620/jessica-rose-and-the-worst-advice-ever",response.Headers.Location.ToString()); }

There's another issue here that I don't understand. Because have to set Client.BaseAddress to https://localhost (because https) and the Client is passed into fixture.Client, I can't set the Base address twice or I'll get an exception, as the Test's Constructor runs twice, but the HttpClient that's passed in as a lifecycler that's longer. It's being reused, and it fails when setting its BaseAddress twice.

Error Message: System.InvalidOperationException : This instance has already started one or more requests. Properties can only be modified before sending the first request.

BUG? So to work around it I check to see if I've done it before. Which is gross. I want to set the BaseAddress once, but I am not in charge of the creation of this HttpClient as it's passed in by the Fixture.

public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(MyOwnTextFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.Client; if (Client.BaseAddress.ToString().StartsWith("https://") == false) Client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://localhost"); }

Another option is that I create a new client every time, which is less efficient and perhaps a better idea as it avoids any side effects from other tests, but also feels weird that I should have to do this, as the new standard for ASP.NET Core sites is to be SSL/HTTPS by default..

public TestingMvcFunctionalTests(MyOwnTextFixture<Startup> fixture) { Client = fixture.CreateClient(new Uri(https://localhost)); }

I'm still learning about how it all fits together, but later I plan to add in Selenium tests to have a full, complete, test suite that includes the browser, CSS, JavaScript, end-to-end integration tests, and unit tests.

Let me know if you think I'm doing something wrong. This is preview stuff, so it's early days!

Sponsor: Get the latest JetBrains Rider for debugging third-party .NET code, Smart Step Into, more debugger improvements, C# Interactive, new project wizard, and formatting code in columns.

© 2018 Scott Hanselman. All rights reserved.

      from Scott Hanselman's Blog http://feeds.hanselman.com/~/536365756/0/scotthanselman~Easier-functional-and-integration-testing-of-ASPNET-Core-applications.aspx

[socialsavvymatt]

24x7 WP Support provides a complete guide for all common #WordPress errors with their solutions. Fixing syntax errors, database connection errors, white screen errors, #internalservererrors, 404 error... https://bit.ly/325pZMz

24x7 WP Support provides a complete guide for all common #WordPress errors with their solutions. Fixing syntax errors, database connection errors, white screen errors, #internalservererrors, 404 error... https://t.co/5tsLqk6Pns

— Matt (@SocialSavvyMatt) August 19, 2020

via Twitter https://twitter.com/SocialSavvyMatt August 19, 2020 at 12:41PM

[learn2smart]

How to #fix #500 #Internal #Server #Error in #WordPress #Website

Visit here - https://youtu.be/hw6F8cTIrv8

#wordpresserror #internalservererror #500internalservererror #wordpressdeveloper #wordpresstheme #wordpressthemes #wordpressdevelopment #webdeveloper #wordpressplugin #wordpresswebsites #theme #plugins #errors #plugin

[knoldus]

In this blog post we’ll see how a file can be streamed from a client (eg: browser) to Amazon S3 (AWS S3) using Alpakka’s AWS S3 connector. Aplakka provides various Akka Stream connectors, integration patterns and data transformations for integration use cases.

The example in this blog post uses Play Framework to provide a user interface to submit a file from a web page directly to AWS S3 without creating any temporary files (on the storage space) during the process. The file will be streamed to AWS S3 using S3’s multi part upload API.

(To understand this blog post basic knowledge of Play Framework and Akka Streams is required)

Let’s begin by looking at the artifacts used for achieving the task at hand

Scala 2.11.11

Play Framework 2.6.10

Alpakka S3 0.18

Now moving on to the fun part, let’s see what the code base will look like. We’ll first create a class for interacting with AWS S3 using the Alpakka S3 connector, let’s name the class as AwsS3Client.

@Singleton class AwsS3Client @Inject()(system: ActorSystem, materializer: Materializer) { private val awsCredentials = new BasicAWSCredentials("AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID", "AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY") private val awsCredentialsProvider = new AWSStaticCredentialsProvider(awsCredentials) private val regionProvider = new AwsRegionProvider { def getRegion: String = "us-west-2" } private val settings = new S3Settings(MemoryBufferType, None, awsCredentialsProvider, regionProvider, false, None, ListBucketVersion2) private val s3Client = new S3Client(settings)(system, materializer) def s3Sink(bucketName: String, bucketKey: String): Sink[ByteString, Future[MultipartUploadResult]] = s3Client.multipartUpload(bucketName, bucketKey) }

From the first line it can be seen the class is marked as a Singleton, this is because we do not want multiple instances of this class to be created. From the next line it can be seen that ActorSystem and Materializer is injected which is required for configuring the Alpakka’s AWS S3 client. The next few lines are for configuring an instance of Alpakka’s AWS S3 client which will be used for interfacing with your AWS S3 bucket. Also, in the last section of the class there’s a behavior which returns a Akka Streams Sink, of type Sink[ByteSring, Future[MultipartUploadResult]], this Sink does the job of sending the file stream to AWS S3 bucket using AWS multi part upload API.

In order to make this class workable replace AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY with your AWS S3 access key and secret key respectively. And replace us-west-2 with your respective AWS region.

Next, let’s look at how the s3Sink behavior of this call can be used to connect our Play Framework’s controller with AWS S3 multi part upload API. But before doing that and slightly digressing from the example [bear with me, it’s going to build up the example further :)], if you followed my previous blog post — Streaming data from PostgreSQL using Akka Streams and Slick in Play Framework [containing Customer Management example] — you might have seen how a CustomerController was used to build a functionality wherein a Play Framework’s route was available to stream the customer data directly from PostgreSQL into a downloadable CSV file (without the need to buffering data as file on storage space). This blog post builds an example on top of the Customer Management example highlighted in the previous blog post. So, we’re going to use the same CustomerController but modify it a bit in terms of adding a new Play Framework’s Action for accepting the file from the web page.

For simplicity, let’s name the controller Action as upload, this Action is used for accepting a file from a web page via one of the reverse route. Let’s first look at the controller code base and then we’ll discuss about the reverse route.

@Singleton class CustomerController @Inject()(cc: ControllerComponents, awsS3Client: AwsS3Client) (implicit ec: ExecutionContext) extends AbstractController(cc) { def upload: Action[MultipartFormData[MultipartUploadResult]] = Action(parse.multipartFormData(handleFilePartAwsUploadResult)) { request => val maybeUploadResult = request.body.file("customers").map { case FilePart(key, filename, contentType, multipartUploadResult) => multipartUploadResult } maybeUploadResult.fold( InternalServerError("Something went wrong!") )(uploadResult => Ok(s"File ${uploadResult.key} upload to bucket ${uploadResult.bucket}") ) } private def handleFilePartAwsUploadResult: Multipart.FilePartHandler[MultipartUploadResult] = { case FileInfo(partName, filename, contentType) => val accumulator = Accumulator(awsS3Client.s3Sink("test-ocr", filename)) accumulator map { multipartUploadResult => FilePart(partName, filename, contentType, multipartUploadResult) } } }

Dissecting the controller code base, it can be seen that the controller is a singleton and the AwsS3Client class that was created earlier is injected in the controller along with the Play ControllerComponents and ExecutionContext.

Let’s look at the private behavior of the CustomerController first, i.e handleFilePartAwsUploadResult. It can be seen that the return type of this behavior is

Multipart.FilePartHandler[MultipartUploadResult]

which is nothing but a Scala type defined inside Play’s Multipart object:

type FilePartHandler[A] = FileInfo => Accumulator[ByteString, FilePart[A]]

It should be noted here that the example uses multipart/form-data encoding for file upload, so the default multipartFormData parser is used by providing a FilePartHandler of type FilePartHandler[MultipartUploadResult]. The type of FilePartHandler is MultipartUploadResult because Alpakka AWS S3 Sink is of type Sink[ByteString, Future[MultipartUploadResult]] to which the file will be finally sent to.

Looking at this private behavior and understanding what it does, it accepts a case class of type FileInfo, creates an Accumulator from s3Sink and then finally maps the result of the Accumulator to a result of type FilePart.

NOTE: Accumulator is essentially a lightweight wrapper around Akka Sink that gets materialized to a Future. It provides convenient methods for working directly with Future as well as transforming the inputs.

Moving ahead and understanding the upload Action, it looks like any other normal Play Framework Action with the only difference that the request body is being parsed to MultipartFormData and then handled via our custom FilePartHandler, i.e handleFilePartAwsUploadResult, which was discussed earlier.

For connecting everything together, we need to enable an end point to facilitate this file upload and a view to be able to submit a file. Let’s add a new reverse route to the Play’s route file:

POST /upload controllers.CustomerController.upload

and a view to enable file upload from the user interface

@import helper._ @()(implicit request: RequestHeader) @main("Customer Management Portal") { <h1><b>Upload Customers to AWS S3</b></h1> @helper.form(CSRF(routes.CustomerController.upload()), 'enctype -> "multipart/form-data") { <input type="file" name="customers"> <br> <input type="submit"> } }

    Note the CSRF which is required for the form as it is enabled by default in Play Framework.

The entire code base is available at the following repository playakkastreams.

Hope this helps, shoot out your queries in the comment section

[inechoingsilence]

" If I understand Le Grand Bois, perhaps the Mother is an aspect of his?" Sophia asked thoughtfully, chewing on a berry. She lost her train of thought as his hand settled on her belly and she pressed her cheek to his lips, encouraging more kisses. " It could, but not everyone is cut out to live like this - so many are too selfish. Better for them to stay as they are, and leave the land to those who appreciate it, like you and I and people who think like us." 

If Derek kept talking like that, she'd melt right there in the woods. His voice had a full on backcountry twang, and it was making her heart race. " That is all we can do - do our part. My mate. My he-bear. My love." she whispered, moving to kiss his cheek in reply to his endearments. " Keep talking like that, you'll have to carry me home." she teased, exaggerating a swoon.

Enchanted Tattoos -CLOSED

Sophia sat down with Derek, grinning happily. ” I agree. If the Mother was not happy, the berries would not be so large, or plentiful. You have cared for the land, leaving little mark, and now you are being blessed. We are being blessed,” she said, reaching up for a handful of the sweet, plump berries. She couldn’t help herself and popped one into her mouth, moaning as she chewed. ” Delicious..here,” she said, offering one to Derek. 

Willingly, she sat in his lap, feeding them both berries and listening as he spoke. She felt like a student to him, and in a way she was. ” We will learn from each other, and become more complete because of it. The whole purpose of living - besides fulfilling whatever destiny is yours- is to learn and to pass on that knowledge. To leave the world a bit better than you found it.” She placed her hand on top of his, resting on her belly, and wasn’t sure how to answer his question. So she left it be - time answered nearly every question, anyway- and fed him more berries.