#London Probate Registry

[iwcprobateservicesuk]

Medallion Signature and Its Importance in the UK6

A Medallion Signature Guarantee (MSG) is a special type of certification primarily used in the United States to authenticate the transfer of securities. It is often required when dealing with stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments to ensure the legitimacy of the transaction and to protect against fraud. However, its relevance and importance are increasingly recognised in the UK, particularly in the context of international financial transactions.

In the UK, the Medallion Signature Guarantee can still play a crucial role. British investors and financial institutions engaging in transatlantic securities transactions often encounter the need for an MSG. This certification provides an additional layer of security, verifying the identity of the person signing the document and ensuring they have the authority to make the transfer.

This is particularly important in preventing fraudulent activities and ensuring the integrity of financial transactions.

The process of obtaining a Medallion Signature Guarantee involves the signee visiting a participating financial institution, such as a bank or brokerage, which is a member of the Medallion program.

The institution verifies the identity and authority of the signee before stamping the document with the Medallion guarantee.

This stamp signifies that the institution stands behind the authenticity of the signature, providing assurance to the receiving party.

While the Medallion Signature Guarantee is more prevalent in the US, its importance in the UK cannot be understated, especially for those involved in international securities transactions. It serves as a robust safeguard against fraud, ensuring the smooth and secure transfer of financial instruments across borders.

[coochiequeens]

Another trans identified male sex offender is could be moved to a Women’s prison

A convicted sex offender in Connecticut is now requesting transfer to the state’s only correctional facility for women after abruptly declaring an “intersex” identity. Brandy Wood, 28, has a lengthy history of sexual crimes against minors.

In 2015, Wood was convicted on two counts of risk of injury to a minor and second-degree sexual assault of a minor for “forcible sexual contact with a 15-year-old female.” He was released from custody and was on parole when he committed yet another offense against a minor.

On January 4, Wood pleaded no contest at the New London Superior Court to the charge of risk of injury to a minor.

Assistant State’s Attorney Theresa Anne Ferryman told the court on Wednesday that Wood, in the new criminal case, engaged in an inappropriate online relationship with a 13-year-old girl in Park City, Utah during the summer of 2021, as reported by local news outlet The Day.

Wood targeted the young girl through FaceTime, SnapChat, and a notorious video-chatting website frequently used by sexual predators called Omegle. According to police youth investigator Joseph Buzzelli, Wood sent pornographic videos and photos of himself to the victim and encouraged her to reciprocate by sending nude photos of herself.

Police said Wood masturbated in front of the girl and bought her presents, including a “full-body fur suit,” which were delivered directly to her home in Park City. The arrival of the fur suit was the incident that first alerted the victim’s parents to the situation, according to the arrest affidavit.

During a police interview, the girl told authorities that Wood had “both a penis and a vagina.” However, law enforcement officials discovered photos of Wood wearing a latex full-body suit designed to resemble a woman, which could account for the child’s confusion regarding Wood’s anatomy.

The victim told police Wood had threatened her during his attempt to obtain nude photos and videos. 

Wood claimed to be a private investigator, knew the victim’s address and said he would “get on a plane and come find her,” as stated in the arrest warrant affidavit. In one exchange, Wood told the victim “if you don’t send me nudes I’m going to come to your house and have sex with you.”

Reduxx found that Wood also claimed to be a private investigator on his LinkedIn account, and has registered a business ostensibly dedicated to service dog training called Connecticut K9 Support Services, LLC. 

The residence address on file for the business is that of a sex offender treatment program in Uncasville, but Wood had posted several job advertisements seeking a volunteer.

“Connecticut K9 Support Services LLC in New London, CT is offering one volunteer position to join our team,” Wood wrote in a now-deleted listing on Tarta. “Our ideal candidate is a self-starter, motivated, and reliable. this position is an opportunity to grow your knowledge in the K9 training and care field as well as the Private Investigative field. after 6 months of volunteering you will be given the option for a part-time or full-time paid position. We are seeking motivated, dog loving, honest, loyal, reliable.”

Attorney Michael Miller, the public defender representing Wood, told the court on Wednesday he intends to request that Wood be housed at York Correctional Institution in Niantic, the state’s only women’s prison. 

Currently, Wood is being held in the Cheshire Correctional Institution for men.

The state’s sexual offender registry lists Wood’s biological sex as “female,” and provides numerous aliases for him such as as Kyle Bailey, Steven Bennett, and Kunani-Brandy Moana Kalakaua-Wood.

Wood is expected to be handed a sentence of 10 years, suspended after 30 months in prison, followed by five years of probation and an undetermined period of time on the state’s sexual offender registry if convicted. 

Attorney for the state Anne Ferryman told the court that the victim’s family is not satisfied with the expected prison sentence. The victim’s parents have told police that the girl was left “feeling suicidal” after the ordeal and is currently receiving psychiatric treatment.

Wood’s lawyer asserted in court that he would pursue his client’s transfer to the women’s prison on March 14, but Judge Hillary Strackbein responded by informing Miller that prison accommodations are ultimately decided by the state Department of Corrections (DOC).

In July of 2018, Connecticut became the first U.S. state to allow male inmates to be housed in female correctional institutions on the basis of a self-declared gender identity. 

The measure was attached to a bill intended to protect incarcerated pregnant women. Connecticut’s SB 13, “An Act Concerning Fair Treatment of Incarcerated Women,” expanded medical care requirements for pregnant inmates, but additionally stipulated that the DOC must “adhere to certain requirements that relate to the treatment and placement of inmates with a gender identity that differs from the inmate’s assigned sex at birth.”

Under the bill, any inmate who “who has a gender identity that differs from the inmate’s assigned sex at birth and has a diagnosis of gender dysphoria” must be addressed by their preferred pronouns, provided with clothing according to their “gender identity,” and be searched by correctional staff of “the same gender identity.”

By Genevieve Gluck Genevieve is the Co-Founder of Reduxx, and the outlet's Chief Investigative Journalist with a focused interest in pornography, sexual predators, and fetish subcultures. She is the creator of the podcast Women's Voices, which features news commentary and interviews regarding women's rights.

[packedwithpackards]

Examining the sources of the Plymouth Colony Pages [Part 37]

David Penrose and Peter Hill, "The Houses of Stonham Aspal," in The Suffolk Review, 4: no. 1.

This is not online but will be requested at some point.

James Savage, A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England, Showing Three Generations of Those Who Came Before May, 1692, on the Basis of Farmer's Register, 4 vols. (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1860-62; reprinted Baltimore, many editions).

This book only has one result for the Packards, which is on page 79.

F. Apthorp Foster, Vital Records of Scituate Massachusetts to the Year 1850, 2 Vols. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1909).

This book has three results for the name Packard. It isn't even worth listing them here.

Waldo Chamberlain Sprague, Genealogies of the Families of Braintree, Mass. 1640-1850. Sprague's extensive research on Braintree families was recorded by him on over 6,000 index cards, now at at the New England Historic Genealogical Society in Boston, and was published by NEHGS on CD-ROM in 2001.

This is found online here and there, but would need to go to the New England Historic Genealogical Society to see it.

Suffolk County Probate Records, Suffolk County Courthouse, 24 New Chardon Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02114.

Probably still have to still get these probate records in England.

Ipswich District Probate Registry, Haven House, 17, Lower Brook Street, Ipswich, Suffolk, England, IP4 1DN.

Probably still have to still get these probate records in England.

The American Genealogist (1932 to present).

You can read this either here or here.

Henry Edwards Scott, Vital Records of Taunton, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850, 3 Vols. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1928-1929).

It is online but barely so it cannot be searched online.

James Davenport, The Washbourne Family of Little Washbourne and Wichenford In the County of Worcester (London: Methuen & Co., 1907).

There are no results in this book which is online partially.

F. Apthorp Foster, Vital Records of West Bridgewater Massachusetts to the Year 1850 (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1911).

This book is available on Internet Archive and there are 75 results in this book. On pages 82 to 86 are births in West Bridgewater.

Vital Records of Wenham Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849 (Salem, MA: The Essex Institute, 1904).

No results for "Packard" were available on the version scanned on Internet Archive.

George Walter Chamberlain, et. al., History of Weymouth Massachusetts, 4 Vols. (Boston: Weymouth Historical Society, 1923).

This book seems to be on Ancestry.com. There are 27 results for the name Packard.

Note: This was originally posted on Apr. 27, 2018 on the main Packed with Packards WordPress blog (it can also be found on the Wayback Machine here). My research is still ongoing, so some conclusions in this piece may change in the future.

© 2018-2022 Burkely Hermann. All rights reserved.

[probateformsuk]

Have you heard of Probate offices to register probate? But what is it in actuality? The offices which issue grants of probate and grants of letters of administration are commonly known as Probate registries.  There are 11 district probate registry offices and 18 sub-district probate registry offices where all the applications are sent to proceed with the probate.

The principal Probate registry is located in central London and is administered by HM court services.

#application for probate form uk  #online application for probate  #probate registry forms uk #probate help #probate application

[wikifoxnews]

Who is Steven Barker ( Stepfather who was jailed for 12 years ) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Crime, Incident details, Investigations and More Facts

Steven Barker Biography                                             Steven Barker Wiki

Baby P's stepfather, who was jailed for 12 years for causing the boy's death and raping a two-year-old girl, has been denied parole for "refusing to face his crimes."

Steven Barker, 44, was jailed for at least 32 years in 2009 for torturing and raping 17-year-old Peter Connelly with his crack-addicted brother Jason Owen, 37, at their home in Tottenham, north London . . two year old girl. well I have no idea who steven crowder is but that doesn’t matter cause they weren’t using it in an acting role playing a slave owner or racist character. Unless Chet is the racist character then it fits — Bobbette Barker (@lucylanexo) March 28, 2021 Peter's mother, Tracey Connelly, 39, was also jailed for viewing pornography in a drunken haze when her 17-month-old baby, Peter, was tortured to death in 2007. Barker, a neo-Nazi who taught one of his sons to greet him with a Nazi salute, was hoping to get out of jail or move to an open prison this year. However, according to The Sun, a college probation committee decided he should stay in a maximum security prison. Psychiatrists and officials told council that the torturing pedophile refused to participate in treatment programs aimed at addressing his violence and sex crimes. A list of her risk factors included her "ability to become sexually aroused with very young children" and "her inability to control her extreme emotions." A spokesperson for the probation committee told The Sun, "Protecting the public is our top priority." Mother Connelly admitted to the crime and was jailed for at least five years and on leave in 2013. However, she was later sent back to jail after being caught sending naughty photos of herself to perverts. obsessed with his notoriety. The probation board reviewed her case for the third time in November 2019, following previous reviews in 2015 and 2017, and refused to release her or send her to an open prison. Peter suffered more than 50 injuries while on the hazard register and had 60 visits from social workers, police and health care workers over an eight-month period. Haringey's council's inability to investigate her mother's web of lies has resulted in Peter and eight other children staying with her in the seedy north London house. Peter and his three sisters shared the four-bedroom house with their mother, boyfriend Barker, pedophile brother Owen, four children, and 15-year-old girlfriend Owen. Three of the children, Peter and two of his siblings, were put on Haringey's child welfare registry for fear their mother would neglect them. Social workers, doctors and doctors saw the family 60 times before Peter, 17, died of horrific injuries that included a broken back and eight broken ribs. Surprisingly, neither of these professionals noticed that two men lived in the apartment, although a family caregiver did meet Barker during a home visit. A thorough background check would reveal that Barker had been charged with animal abuse by the RSPCA and that he and his brother were under investigation for torturing their own grandmother. Owen, who changed his name after a family dispute, was convicted of theft, arson and assault and was charged with raping an 11-year-old girl when she was 13. Read the full article

[iwcprobateservicesuk]

Navigating the London Probate Registry and Probate Registry England: A Guide

Introduction:

Probate, the legal process of administering a deceased person's estate, can seem daunting. However, understanding the role of probate registries in England, especially the London Probate Registry, can ease the process. Let's delve into what these registries are and how they function.

How Probate Registries Operate:

Probate registries serve as vital hubs for handling estate matters after someone passes away. They are government offices responsible for processing probate applications and issuing grants of probate or letters of administration.

How London Probate Registry Stands Out:

As one of the busiest probate registries in England, the London Probate Registry handles a significant volume of cases due to the city's size and population. Situated in the heart of London, it serves as a central point for probate matters in the capital.

How to Initiate Probate Proceedings:

The first step in probate is lodging an application with the appropriate registry. For London residents or estates with assets in London, the London Probate Registry is the go-to option. However, for estates outside London, other regional probate registries handle the process.

How to Obtain Probate Forms:

Probate forms are necessary documents for initiating probate proceedings. They are available online or at probate registries. London Probate Registry provides access to these forms, which include the PA1 form for probate applications and other supporting documents.

How to Submit Probate Applications:

Once the required forms are filled out, they must be submitted to the relevant probate registry. London Probate Registry accepts applications either by post or in person. It's essential to ensure all documents are complete and accurate to prevent delays in processing.

How Probate Registries Assist Executors:

Executors, individuals appointed to administer estates, often seek guidance from probate registries. London Probate Registry offers assistance to executors, clarifying procedures, and addressing queries related to the probate process.

How Probate Registries Verify Wills:

Valid wills are crucial for probate proceedings. Probate registries, including the London Probate Registry, verify the authenticity of wills submitted with probate applications. This verification process ensures that the deceased's wishes are accurately reflected.

How Probate Registries Handle Estate Assets:

Probate registries oversee the distribution of estate assets in accordance with the law and the deceased's will, if applicable. They ensure that debts, taxes, and administration expenses are settled before distributing assets to beneficiaries.

How Probate Registries Maintain Records:

Probate registries maintain detailed records of probate applications and grants issued. These records are accessible to the public and serve as valuable resources for genealogists, historians, and individuals researching family histories.

How Probate Registries Adapt to Technological Advances:

In recent years, probate registries have embraced technology to streamline processes and improve accessibility. Online platforms allow individuals to submit probate applications electronically, reducing paperwork and expediting the probate process.

Conclusion:

Navigating the London Probate Registry and other probate registries in England is crucial for efficiently managing estate matters. Understanding how these registries operate and utilizing their services can simplify the probate process during what can be a challenging time. Whether you're an executor, beneficiary, or legal representative, familiarizing yourself with probate registry procedures is essential for a smooth administration of estates.

[chillmall3]

Six Steps To Taking Care Of The Estate Of A Family Member Or Close Friend After Theyve Died

Just How Much Does It Set You Back For A Lawyer To Write Your Will?

Content

Will Writing Services Readily Available.

Can You Write Your Very Own Will Without A Solicitor? The Troubles That Can Arise.

Perplexed By Wills: Greater Than 5 Million Grownups Do Not Recognize Where To Begin.

How Much Does It Cost To Produce A Will?

Utilize Our Wills Planner Tool.

You can request for a search to be made by sending a letter along with an official copy of the death certification. Buying, offering or launching equity in a house or level can entail substantial quantities of money and also crucial building law concerns. Hard as well as distressing inheritance issues can emerge if you aren't receiving your reasonable share, or if the administrators of a will aren't acting properly. Making a will is an important part of your inheritance preparation, assisting to make certain that your assets will be passed on to the best people.

As an example, if the departed owned and operated component of a building or company, or trusts are involved, you need to take professional guidance. Appraisal of monetary assets is usually rather uncomplicated, though some banks may charge a charge to provide a probate assessment. Prior to applying, you need to determine the amount of duplicates of the grant of probate you will desire.

Will Writing Services Offered.

Added http://canons-ashby.wills4less.co.uk/ make it less complicated to deal with all the organisations who may ask to see official duplicates of the give. You will require to submit a declaration of truth, either online or at a probate pc registry, confirming that the details you have actually offered is true as well as promising to administer the estate correctly. Naturally, if the deceased was purposely hiding properties there might be little or no proof to show the way.

With your assistance we can be there for the hundreds of older individuals facing later life alone in Northern Ireland.

As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, changes have actually been made to the policies for observing wills.

Leaving a gift in your will to Age UK is an unique way to ensure older people have the assistance they need in the years to find.

Discover how a present in your will might be a lifeline for those who have nowhere else to turn.

If you want to write a will however need some even more guidance, below's where you can obtain more details.

If you have a serious illness or a diagnosis of dementia, you can still make a will, but you require to have the mental capability to make certain it is valid.

A trust fund is utilized as a way of shielding assets and also regulating exactly how they are made use of after they have actually been given away. When a settlor makes a straight-out present, either throughout their life time or after their fatality, the beneficiary assumes all rights and also control over the assets.

Can You Write Your Very Own Will Without A Solicitor? The Issues That Can Arise.

If you think this holds true, you may wish to take lawful suggestions on what you ought to do. Take advice from the probate pc registry or your probate specialist on the most effective option as well as how to deal with it. If there is a will, a recipient under the will can relate to work as administrator. If there is no valid will, one or more family members will normally be entitled to acquire and also can apply to administer the estate. If there is no legitimate will, the estate is dealt with similarly as if the deceased died 'intestate'. If you still can't locate the will, it deserves asking anyone else that you assume might have been asked to be an administrator - usually household or close friends - in situation they recognize where the will was maintained. Conversely, the will may have been deposited with the probate windows registry.

Grand slam winners record: How Nadal, Djokovic and Federer compare in the race for the most men’s titles - iNews

Grand slam winners record: How Nadal, Djokovic and Federer compare in the race for the most men’s titles.

Posted: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:00:00 GMT [source]

Trustees owe a legal obligation to the trust's beneficiaries and also for that reason have to act in the very best interests of the beneficiaries. Choosing your trustee should be a cautious choice, taking into account their trustworthiness, economic responsibility and also whether they have the management abilities to manage the trust effectively.

Perplexed By Wills: More Than 5 Million Adults Do Not Recognize Where To Begin.

The production of a depend on makes it possible for the settlor to affix problems to the assets. For instance, the settlor may call for that the properties can not be handed out throughout their lifetime. Whether a trust is produced throughout the settlor's lifetime or after their fatality, the trust file will state who is accountable for managing the trust for however long the trust lasts.

If a testator intends to leave a present to a child, it will be held in a count on for them until they turn 18. The interpretation of 'kid' in a will is broad and also can consist of step-children. Consequently, in scenarios where children are included, it is best to particularly call of all youngsters within the will. Heritages as well as bequests are the kinds of gifts or possessions you wish to entrust to any type of individuals or charities. There are several kinds of heritages that a testator can leave. In Scotland, the executor must acquire 'confirmation' or authority to provide the estate from the Constable Court.

Just How Much Does It Set You Back To Develop A Will?

You may want to promote the death locally and in the London Gazette, asking anyone who believes they may have an insurance claim against the estate to contact you within two months. This assists safeguard you against any future insurance claims from unidentified lenders. Where the value of the net estate goes beyond ₤ 2 million, this added nil-rate allowance will be tapered away at a price of ₤ 1 for every single ₤ 2 of worth. So there is no such allowance on estates worth ₤ 2.35 million (or worth ₤ 2.7 million on the fatality of a surviving partner where the full allowance is available to be moved).

[youinmyhoodnowson]

medical marijuana card california

With a California medicinal marijuana card or a cannabis membership card California residents can legally acquire medical marijuana from any of the medical marijuana dispensaries within the state. So search for something like "Denver dispensary evaluation" or just "the best Denver dispensaries" and you should get you the appropriate results. Due to this fact, each dispensary has its personal brand and array of merchandise. Along with your card in hand, it’s now time to make your first medical marijuana dispensary. Most individuals choose to go to a medical marijuana dispensary with their prescription. Marijuana is just not solely very effective in treating a number of illnesses and diseases but it surely also has turn out to be a drug which is extraordinarily protected -- safer than most medicines prescribed every single day. Medical marijuana has been extremely profitable in the treatment of medical marijuana doctors all above-talked about diseases. Some states, together with Washington State, do not essentially concern a medical marijuana card. He joked "when I've seven-eighths of a gram of marijuana, I consider myself to be out of marijuana." He defined that he has a "medical marijuana" card issued in California.

Medical marijuana card guarantees to offer excessive degree services & fulfill their customer needs. Although the Florida Medical Marijuana Card application and qualification course of is irritating, My Florida Green has worked laborious to streamline the process, provide access to one of the best Medical Marijuana doctors, and safe patient information with HIPAA-compliant technology. If you’re a former member of the army, you may possibly be exempt from submitting an application for a CDL. Merely fill out our New Member Form and Affected person and Caregiver Waiver to grow to be a patient with Revolutionary Clinics. If a chosen caregiver is authorized to grow medical marijuana, they might develop exterior, but must adjust to the regulation. Any intent to renew after the expiration date would require a brand new utility for each you and your designated caregiver. If you'll somewhat full a physical utility than going the net route, you can download your affected person software proper right here.

With this card, you'll be able to see the physician at residence in your phone with our app. Other caveats: Cops operating your license will not be able to see that you're a patient, but they can use their very own senses to detect impaired driving or marijuana in a vehicle. Can just anyone see them? You'll be able to learn more about the various circumstances that medical marijuana is helping individuals such as you alleviate each day, click Qualifying Circumstances for Recommendation for more info. There are a lot of situations that are shared on most lists. Weedmaps and Leafly are both great resources for locating cannabis-pleasant physicians near you. Solely doctor accredited patients can use cannabis legally in California. Now, you still can’t grow your individual cannabis, but you should purchase it and devour it. If a patient has a health condition that will profit from the use of cannabis, the place would he or she find a list of medical marijuana docs?

We know it can be troublesome to seek out consistent and dependable professional medical marijuana docs in Colorado Springs and Pueblo. Know the legal guidelines on how caregivers can present help. Two state supreme courts have now so concluded (these surprised by Bourgoin likely both did not learn Coates, did not understand Coates, or forgot Coates). At this stage, it's now probably to attain the agreed quantities of medical marijuana dispensaries, amongst other things provided now in some international locations in the United States. Drying and shredding of the 'hemp' plant is how marijuana is produced. He should possess a medical marijuana license. If there's a cannabis therapy program in your state, studying learn how to get a medical cannabis card is important for benefiting from it. The actual fact that you've got a Registry Card is protected by State Regulation and you could choose to keep your possession utterly private. CBD is totally THC free and may be made use of for extensive pediatric care for kids and delicate adults too.

The Compassionate Use Act allowed for the enlargement of the MMP’s retailers and qualifying circumstances, but the DOH has not even begun the method for increasing this system. If you don’t mind paying a little more, their premium service will delve even deeper and produce a last report which is one of the detailed we have now encountered. However, it’s good to maintain the above in mind when making use of on your card. On the other hand, having a cannabis card eliminates the sales tax and the financial savings start to add up in a short time. Everybody pays different taxes, both straight or indirectly, together with a 15 percent state excise tax and pot-particular local taxes (four p.c on gross sales in Sacramento). Be an Illinois state resident with proof of residency. The net verification program doesn't disclose any information about our patients. GreenStar patients receive more than a physician advice, we assure patients will likely be educated by a highly credible employees. Some individuals will not feel that it helps them, and others will discover surefire relief from utilizing it. Notice: You'll have to pay a certification payment.

How to Get an Exception for the Use of Medical Marijuana When on Probation for DUI Is medicinal marijuana more advanced than prescription analgesics to managing chronic pain? Chronic pain overall constitutes the largest using medicinal marijuana. The opioid narcotics that are popular to take care of chronic pain, like codeine, morphine, oxycodone, and methadone, are potentially addictive. Chronic pain medications might end up bringing about tolerance which has a need of increasing dosage to maintain effectiveness. Low grade marijuana contains 1 to 3 percent delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which is what is typically sold recreationally. THC is well regarded because the most active psychoactive agent in marijuana. High grade marijuana known as sinsemilla contains 7 to 8 percent THC and hashish is between 7 and 20 percent. The most concentrated way of marijuana is hash oil that might contain up to 70% THC!

More than 10 % Americans over 65 years old can are afflicted by incontinence and ladies suffer in excess of men using this type of problem. Investigators at Oxford's Centre for Enablement in Britain reported within the February 2003 issue of the journal Clinical Rehabilitation that in comparison with placebo in patients being affected by MS and spinal cord injury, self-administered doses of whole plant cannabinoid extracts dramatically improved bladder control. These initial findings were followed up by investigators at London's Institute for Neurology inside a pilot and open-label study of medical cannabis or MMJ extracts for bladder dysfunction. A group of 15 patients with advanced multiple sclerosis were tested for that effect that medicinal marijuana had on the the signs of urinary incontinence. The medical advantages of cannabis cover a large scope of issues. It is utilized as being a strategy to nausea and excessive vomiting, together with stomach pain and cramping. It has recently been recognized to treat cancer patients and relieve intense pain caused by debilitating diseases or injuries. The most famous mention of fantastic can be used for glaucoma patients. These patients usually see a marked change in their personal health insurance frame of mind when using it as being a medication.

Provided that the cardboard holder is holding a valid card and abiding by the medicinal marijuana laws of their state - which vary from region to region slightly - they are afforded protection from legal prosecution for possessing medicinal marijuana. Most states have even created an electronic digital system for police officers to ensure that the card is valid, so that they don't arrest a lawfully biding patient that's within their legal rights to make use of this natural medicine. Patients who are marijuana medical card holders can possess, transport and make use of - and in some cases also grow - medical cannabis form of hosting usage; or their caregivers who employ a card are afforded similar protection under the law and protections, too.

[probatewill-blog]

Get the proper guidelines from Probate Lawyer London here 

[probateformsuk]

How to apply for a Grant of Probate- Probate Forms

Applying for probate requires completing all the relevant probate forms and sending them off to the main probate registry located in London. If you are inexperienced with legal documents, this can be a complicated and time consuming process, which is not something you want to deal with while grieving over a lost loved one.

The time it takes for probate to be issued and the estate to be settled completely depends on many factors. If no errors or issues arise expect the whole  process to apply for a grant of probate take between 1 or 2 months.

#probatewill  #probateformsonlineuk #applyforgrantofprobateform  #applicationforprobateformuk #probateregistryform #probateregistryformsuk #onlineprobateform #applicationforprobateform #formforprobate #probateapplication

[probatelondon]

Probate Registry

People aren’t always aware that the Probate office in London is a part of the High Court. Actually known as the Probate Registry, there are many probate registries around the UK. The London Probate Registry is known as the main registry.  All the probate registries are led by the government, which can mean they’re difficult to contact. If you call us here at IWC on 0208 171 029, we can help with most London probate matters.

[enetproperty-blog]

who is responsible for fixing my fence or wall

Who is Responsible for Fixing a Fence or Wall – Me or My Neighbour? The issue of who owns a fence or a wall in a garden, and whether you or your neighbour should be responsible to  fix it when it blows down or needs repair, can be a tricky one says David Lawrenson of www.LettingFocus.com. And these boundary issues can lead to fallings out with neighbours. When it gets really windy for a few days or weeks, most people just shrug their shoulders and put their face into the wind. But for landlords like me, I know that, sure enough, I can expect a call about a fence that has blown down on at least one of my properties somewhere. I have one property I let out on the coast in Kent – and I know from experience that is it in an area that has much stronger wind gusts than we have in London. And so, it is always proving to be the property that is most vulnerable to gales. Next door to my place there, is a neighbour who is an old retired chap, who lives with his wife. They are both in their 80s – and as he always reminds me, “are dependent on a pension.” Who is Responsible for Fixing a Fence or Wall – What Does the Sellers Questionnaire Say? My tenant is a real sweetie who has been my tenant for 15 years. She just about “gets on” with this neighbour. The neighbour’s view is that it is for “Muggins the Landlord” – i.e. Me, who has responsibility to repair the fence. He says that the person who used to own my property always did the fence on our side – and repaired it. Unfortunately, I have no way of validating this assertion because it was a probate sale back in 2006 – and with the owner being deceased, there was no one available to fill out a Sellers Questionnaire. But even if the person who sold to me had said that they were indeed responsible, would that matter anyway? Actually, maybe, but possibly not. Because to find out whether you or your neighbour is responsible for repairing or replacing a wall or fence along the boundary between you, one first needs to check your own title documents, (title plan and title register) – as there may a statement in there, though it is very common for there not to be. You can download these for £3 from the Land Registry. If your own title documents are not clear, the next action is to check your neighbours title plan and register. Who is Responsible for Fixing a Fence or Wall – Check The Title Plan and Regsiter and What it says about Boundaries For more modern housing, especially those on modern housing estates, it is increasingly likely that the title plan attached to the first transfer of a newly built house will show internal “T” marks inside the boundaries belonging to the property. If the “T” marks are external it will indicate the boundary is the relevant neighbour’s responsibility to repair, if internal, it is your duty. “H” marks (effectively “T” marks on each side) will indicate that the boundary is shared. So far so clear, but as this involves legal stuff, you’d just kind of know that there has to be more grey areas that this. (If all was crystal clear lawyers would have no way of making money!). So, it might be that an original fence has blown down and been replaced by a neighbour who was not originally responsible for it. By doing this, they have become the owner of the new fence, so it is their responsibility to repair it – though, in the absence of a legal obligation and clear proof of past intent, they cannot actually be forced to do so. Who is Responsible for Fixing a Fence or Wall – Has Anything been Agreed in Writing? So, again it’s back to the title documents. In the same way, neighbouring owners may agree to share the cost of replacing a fence that was previously the responsibility of one of them alone. So figuring out what they actually agreed in writing in the past, goes a long way towards what responsibilities they also took on for the future maintenance of the fence or wall. (In the rare case where animals are involved, it is the animal-owner’s responsibility to fence their livestock in – though this does not automatically prove the relevant fence is theirs, but it raises an enhanced possibility that it is). Some people think that a person will have erected a fence, and therefore own it, if the posts and rails are on their side – with the “neat” side facing their neighbour owner’s side. However, it is at least as likely that the owners of the fence will want to benefit from looking at the “neat” side. This also has the logic that an owner would erect the upright posts on his side of the boundary, and nail the boards to the horizontal rails from his side – so in this case, the neat side will face the owner of the fence. So, no clarity there! Similarly, there is no truth in the myth that the boundary wall or fence on the left (or right) of a property “always” belongs to that property. So what happens if you cannot identify whose responsibility it is from past actions and if the title documents are silent on this (as they will usually be for houses built pre the 1970s, like mine in Kent)? Who is Responsible for Fixing a Fence or Wall – If the Title Register and  Plan are Silent, then it’s Shared Well, in that case the legal presumptions is that, in the absence of ‘T’ marks or words confirming the position in the title documents, a wall or fence is presumed to be jointly owned and its maintenance a joint responsibility. In the special case where a fence or hedge is next to a ditch, the legal presumption is that the landowner, before erecting the fence or planting the hedge, would dig the ditch at the boundary, with the hedge or fence put on the mound that has been created by the dirt from the ditch, in which case both the ditch and the hedge would belong to that owner. In my case, when all else failed, after speaking to my neighbour, I decided to pay this time, but with my verbal parting shot being that “If the lady on the other side of me also thinks it is for me to pay for that fence too, that would change things here for us.” So, on the basis that “good fences make good neighbours”, I sent a cheque for £100 to the neighbour to pay to his man to fix the fence. I did not admit liability or even say what the money was for, in writing – I just stuck a cheque in the post. No message, just the cheque. This way, I protect myself from future liability but save from falling out with a neighbour over such a small amount. ABOUT LETTINGFOCUS Services for Private Landlords We help landlords and property investors by showing them how to make money in the private rented sector using ways which are fair to tenants and which involve minimal risk. Our advice is completely independent. We take don’t commission payments or fees from anyone, ever. Services to Businesses and the Public Sector We advise a range of organisations too to help them develop and improve their services and products for private landlords. David Lawrenson, founder of LettingFocus, also writes for property portals, speaks at property events and is regularly quoted by the media. HOME PAGE OF THIS BLOG: Blog THE HOME PAGE OF THE MAIN SITE: http://www.LettingFocus.com For general information on our CONSULTING SERVICES: Consultancy and Seminars For ONE TO ONE PRIVATE CONSULTANCY FOR PRIVATE LANDLORDS: Property Advice CLIENT TESTIMONIALS – from both organisations and private landlords: Testimonials IN THE MEDIA: Recent Press Coverage BOOKS: “SUCCESSFUL PROPERTY LETTING”: Our book is the highest selling personal finance and property book in the UK. Click here to Find Out More and Buy it. And if you are from an organisation and would like to bulk buy, please ask us for special rates. “BUY TO LET LANDLORDS GUIDE TO FINDING GREAT TENANTS”: Also, get this great new guide here, which covers everything you’ll ever need to know to avoid either you or your letting agent getting anyone other than the perfect tenant. Click Here to Buy It. BOOK FOR TENANTS: Kids going off and renting for the first time? My Book for Tenants is also Available TO JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER MAILER which goes to over 3,990 people (as at Jan 2019) just send an email to david@LettingFocus.com We do not send spam or sell our mailing list to advertisers, though we occasionally mail landlords about good products from third parties. Please put us on your “white list” to ensure you receive our emails. OFFERS ON PRODUCTS FOR LANDLORDS and TO ADVERTISE YOUR PRODUCTS to LANDLORDS: Landlords Resources PERUSE LAST TEN BLOGS BY GETTING THE RSS FEED: Click Here NEXT ANNUAL SEMINAR EVENT FOR LANDLORDS: Landlord and Property Letting Seminar TWITTER PAGE My thoughts on property, personal finance, plus a lot of other random things: Twitter  Copyright of Blog: David Lawrenson 2019. Please link to us here or quote us. We actively pursue copyright infringements.The post who is responsible for fixing my fence or wall appeared first on Letting Focus.

https://www.lettingfocus.com/blogs/2019/04/who-is-responsible-for-fixing-my-fence-or-wall/

[iwcprobateservicesuk]

Understanding Probate Registry in England and London Probate Registry

Probate Registry in England is an essential institution that deals with the legal processes surrounding the estates of deceased individuals. It ensures that the deceased's assets are distributed according to their wishes or, if there is no will, according to the laws of intestacy. The London Probate Registry, being the largest in the country, plays a crucial role in facilitating this process. Here's a comprehensive look at what you need to know about Probate Registry in England and specifically the London Probate Registry.

What is Probate Registry?

The Probate Registry is a division of the High Court in England and Wales. It is responsible for granting probate and letters of administration, which are legal documents allowing the executors or administrators to handle the deceased person's estate.

What Does Probate Involve?

Probate involves proving that a deceased person's will is valid and administering their estate. This includes identifying and valuing their assets, paying any outstanding debts and taxes, and distributing the remaining assets to the beneficiaries.

What is the Role of London Probate Registry?

London Probate Registry is the principal registry for probate matters in England and Wales. It deals with probate applications for individuals who lived or owned property in London or whose estates exceed a certain threshold.

What Documents Are Required?

To apply for probate, you need to complete the appropriate forms and submit them to the Probate Registry along with the original will (if there is one), the death certificate, and an application fee. You may also need to provide additional documents depending on the complexity of the estate.

What Happens at the Probate Registry?

Once your application is received, it will be reviewed by a probate officer at the registry. They will check that the forms are completed correctly and that all necessary documents are included. If everything is in order, they will issue the grant of probate or letters of administration.

What if There is a Dispute?

If there is a dispute over the validity of the will or how the estate should be distributed, it may be necessary to resolve the matter through the courts. This could involve attending hearings at the Probate Registry or the High Court.

What Are the Fees Involved?

There is a fee payable to the Probate Registry for applying for probate. The amount depends on the value of the estate, with higher fees for larger estates. In addition, there may be legal fees if you choose to hire a solicitor to help with the probate process.

What Are the Timelines?

The time it takes to obtain probate can vary depending on the complexity of the estate and whether there are any disputes. In straightforward cases, it typically takes around 2-3 months from the date of application to receive the grant of probate.

What Happens After Probate is Granted?

Once probate is granted, the executors or administrators can start administering the estate. This involves collecting in the assets, paying any outstanding debts and taxes, and distributing the remaining assets to the beneficiaries according to the terms of the will or the laws of intestacy.

What if I Need Help?

If you're unsure about the probate process or need assistance with your application, you can seek advice from a probate solicitor or contact the Probate Registry helpline for guidance. They will be able to provide you with the information and support you need to navigate the process smoothly.

[tonantzinagainsttrafficking]

Mexico celebrated a milestone success in repatriation of cultural heritage this year. Others have not been so lucky. These 6 countries are still attempting to recover from the illicit trading habits of one collector: Leonardo Patterson.

Leonardo Patterson with pieces of his collection. (Image source: 

https://bit.ly/1SNOy2g)

Born in 1942 in Costa Rica to Jamaican parents, Leonardo Patterson is a antiquities dealer and collector renown for the controversy and litigation surrounding him. A 2015 New York Times article describes him as an “orphan who rose from [digging] artifacts out of Central American yam fields to holding multimillion-dollar exhibitions of pre-Columbian treasures in Manhattan and Munich” (Mashberg). He got into the business through Everett Rassiga, a New York gallery owner known for trafficking. In the 1970s, Rassigna was involved in the theft of a priceless Maya object, La Fachada de Placeres. Patterson began as a salesman in one of Rassiga’s galleries, but likewise took advantage of lax antiquities trade laws in the 1960s and 70s and started dealing prior to changes prompted by the 1970 UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) convention on the illegal export of cultural property (López).

Patterson & Rassiga (Image source: https://bit.ly/2Cz4lVE & 

https://bit.ly/2eZwXLU)

Rassiga was involved in the theft of this piece, La Fachada de Placeres (Image source:  https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/04/06/la_serpiente_emplumada/1523042975_396958.html)

As restrictions tightened, Patterson became the subject of several legal cases regarding the sale and repatriation of illicit and inauthentic Precolumbian (a standard but problematic term in the art world) artifacts. In fact, Patterson has one of the longest criminal records of any prominent art dealer/collector: three detentions and five sentences for different offenses. In a May 2016 report in Der Spiegel magazine, he admits to journalist Konstantin von Hammerstein, “all these objects of art came into my possession thanks to a network of collaborators who explored archaeological sites in different countries” (quoted in López).

In 1984 the FBI charged Patterson with wire fraud via his attempt to sell an inauthentic Maya fresco to dealer Wayne Anderson for $100,000. Allegedly, he told Anderson that the fresco had been authenticated by Donald Hales, a Maya researcher in California that is associated with some of the publications of Maya vases that went on to become part of the November Collection, discussed in our last blog. Hales clarified that Patterson brought him to Switzerland to asses five frescos in a Swiss collection, but that the fresco in question was not among them. Patterson also claimed that Paul Clifford, an appraiser in North Carolina, had authenticated the fresco. Once Patterson was arrested, the fresco was deemed a fake by Clemency Coggins, the same archaeologist and art historian that went on to advise the Museum of Fine Arts Boston not to acquire the November Collection. Patterson was sentenced to probation (Yates).

The following year, while still on probation, he was arrested at the Dallas-Fort Worth airport, found to be in possession of an undeclared Precolumbian figurine (dated between A.D. 650 and A.D. 850) and, bizarrely, 36 endangered sea turtle eggs that he claimed were part of a diet for his health. This time, he was sentenced to a year in prison on smuggling charges (Yates & Mashberg).

Patterson’s time in the U.N. was brief. (Image source: https://bit.ly/2eZwXLU)

Despite these convictions, he was appointed cultural attaché, or cultural diplomat, to the UN in 1995; he resigned, however, when questions about his past began to loom. He then began spending more time in Europe, particularly Germany where he now resides. He started hosting exhibitions and sales in France and Spain, but curators became suspicious of both the items’ authenticity and provenance. In 1996, Patterson put his private collection of Precolumbian art on display in Santiago de Compostela, Spain. This exhibit led to an Interpol alert regarding the illicit provenance (origin) of his collection (López).

That same year, Peruvian collector Raúl Apesteguía was brutally murdered. The day of the crime, one of his most important pieces, a golden Moche headdress, disappeared from his home in Lima. In 2006, a decade later, it was found at the home of Patterson’s lawyer in London. This connection to Patterson is certainly alarming, but Peruvian prosecutors failed to investigate the links to this case, which remains unpunished (López). Peru has, however, sought repatriation of the objects found in Patterson’s collection displayed in Spain.

The Moche headdress stolen from Apesteguía the day of his murder. (Image source: https://bit.ly/2yPSG1m)

In fact, the Interpol alert following the 1996 exhibit in Santiago de Compostela prompted five countries, Peru, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Colombia to press charges against him in 2004, while a 6th, Ecuador, did not press charges but sought repatriation (López). Spanish officials attempted to keep his collection in Spain as these claims were addressed, but Patterson was able to send most of it “home” to Germany (Mashberg).

Unfortunately for the countries seeking repatriation, Germany has placed significant (and arguably ridiculous) financial and infrastructural roadblocks in their way. Germany demands 90,000 euros from each of the claimant states in order to pay for the investigation and storage of the objects. Furthermore, the German Law on the Repatriation of Cultural Heritage requires the the affected state to show that the item is registered in a database of all cultural artifacts that is not only available to the general public but the GERMAN public as well. To add insult to injury, the law also determines that only objects that entered Germany AFTER 2007 can be returned because Germany only chose to ratify the UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property in November 2007, 35 years after its establishment. Due to this rigid framework, the Bavarian Supreme Administrative Litigation Court rejected requests from Peru, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica and Colombia for restitution of archaeological pieces in 2010 (López). However, some monumental yet minuscule victories have been won by those with sufficient resources.

This graph shows how GDP per capita in these regions compares to global superpower the United States (The “1” in the graph represents 100% of the U.S. GDP per capita). It demonstrates the effects of barriers to growth in Latin America by showing how the region has fallen economically as others rise. In 1950, the average Latin American country’s GDP per capita was 28% of that of the U.S., but this fell to 22% by 2000. Meanwhile, the average European country fared much better, enjoying a rise from 40% in 1950 to 67% of U.S. GDP per capita in 2000 (Image source: https://bit.ly/2S5bKBt).

This illustrates the weakening of Latin American countries in this period, during which looting and illicit trafficking of cultural property was most rampant. It is no wonder that many of these countries that brought suit against Germany were no match for its economic advantage and significant financial barriers to repatriation.

Peru

Peru got lucky; it was the first country to discover the illegal origin of Patterson’s collection and in 2006 began diplomatic negotiations with Spain to repatriate items. 273 items that had been stored in a warehouse in Santiago de Compostela were returned to Peru; however, four textiles (from the Chimú and Nazca-Wari cultures) remain outstanding and nine pieces of Prehispanic goldsmithing, found in the 1996 exhibition catalogue, were not recovered at the warehouse. Peru’s Ministry of Culture has sent four letters to Germany requesting their recovery and return, all rejected (López).

This is not one of the Moche textiles Peru is requesting from Germany. However, while searching for a photo example I stumbled upon this site, antiques.com, that appears to list artifacts like these available at galleries worldwide. How jarring it is to see an invaluable piece of cultural heritage available for just a few hundred dollars online. (Image source: https://bit.ly/2yqdYn1)

Guatemala

Guatemala attempted to recover 369 Maya artifacts from Patterson’s collection but has been forced to desist due to being unable to meet the requirements set by Germany. The main issue is that the objects do not appear in an official registry because they were looted from sites that had not yet been formally explored! Furthermore, Guatemala did not allocate a sufficient budget for an expert to travel to Munich and investigate; therefore, an investigation of the objects was conducted only using photographs. The state also did not invest in legal counsel. The country’s resources are simply lacking (López).

In 2013, both Peru and Guatemala requested the extradition of Patterson while he was in Spain. He appeared in court in Santiago de Compostela on charges of smuggling cultural property, prompted by the illegal shipping of his collection to Germany when he began to face allegations. Unfortunately he was acquitted, after which he returned Munich, where the extradition requests were voided as Peru and Guatemala do not hold extradition treaties with Germany. Furthermore, Germany does not consider the possession of cultural assets in private hands as a crime (López).

Costa Rica

Costa Rica, Patterson’s home country, sought to repatriate 497 items, but also lacked resources to to undertake a proper investigation. In 2009, the National Museum of Costa Rica found itself unable to afford the expenses required by Germany to conduct the investigative process. Costa Rica was only able to procure two objects that had been left by Patterson in Spain, a vase and a grinding stone. Yet, they never made it home— both disappeared from the Costa Rican Embassy in Madrid in 2010. As if that wasn’t enough of a blow, Germany offered Costa Rica the opportunity to to be appointed legal custodian of the Patterson Collection, but this was contingent on a provided guarantee of several million euros! The country could not spare such a great expense. Rocío Fernández, Director of the National Museum of Costa Rica, says of Patterson and the art trade:

Patterson made a business out of archeology and the falsification of objects.  He linked himself politically with the ruling class in Costa Rica during all its governments. He had a gift for deceiving people. That is what makes one wonder how the [art] market works. (quoted in López)

Ecuador & Colombia

Ecuador and Colombia were also unsuccessful in procuring their stolen items. Ecuador identified 121 cultural artifacts from photos on a disk provided by Interpol in 2008. It, however, did not place a criminal complaint against Patterson (for reasons I was unable to determine). Though it filed a complaint with German authorities for not providing access to documents regarding the case against him in Munich, Ecuador suspended its requests for repatriation in 2010. I was not able to find much information on Colombia’s efforts for repatriation, but it has also suspended its claim within the last few years (López). Though sources were not clear, it seems that as of 2016, both countries may have backed down due to the unreasonable stipulations within the German Law on the Repatriation of Cultural Heritage mentioned earlier.

Mexico

Mexico, however, has recently made headlines in its successful repatriation of two 3,000 year-old wooden Olmec busts earlier this year (2018). 

One of the busts repatriated to Mexico. The busts are examples of the Olmec culture from the El Manati site, thought to be looted shortly after its excavation in the 1980s. (Image source: https://bit.ly/2q2ufKb)

The Patterson Collection has 690 pieces of Mexican origin, and Mexican officials claim to have linked more than 200 pieces to Luis Bianchi, a deceased forger of pre-Columbian artifacts (teleSUR; Mashberg). They describe these pieces of his multi-million dollar collection as consisting of a mixture of “terra-cotta, basalt stone and limestone busts; terra-cotta kettles and urns; obsidian and stone projectile tips and knives; braziers and incense burners; obsidian ornaments; stone seals; incense holders; cases; and necklaces and strings” (Mashberg).

The second Olmec bust repatriated to Mexico.

Though he was acquitted in the 2013 trial in Spain, in November 2015 Patterson was found guilty by a Munich court for both dealing inauthentic works and possessing looted artifacts. He was fined $40,000, his passport was confiscated, and he was sentenced to probation and house arrest for three years. He was also, in a monumental victory for repatriation in Mexico, ordered to return two carved wooden Olmec heads, valued at over $50,000 each. Though the lawyer representing Mexico, Robert A. Kugler, calls this a “milestone verdict,” the fight is not over. Mexico still has motive to reclaim other items from Patterson’s collection of at least 1,029 Aztec, Maya, and Olmec artifacts (Mashberg). After a ten-year trial, and over two years after the ruling, the Olmec heads were handed to Mexican authorities this spring.

Countless other items are still in limbo.

What is significant and maddening about these cases is the stringent guidelines placed by Germany in order for these countries to recoup what has been stolen from them. The financial restrictions are especially telling; Germany knows countries that have lost cultural artifacts to illicit means are often suffering from weakened infrastructure due to war, poverty, and other devastations. It holds much greater economic power yet has inflated financial restrictions to offset what little chance countries like Guatemala, still recovering from over 30 years of civil war and foreign extraction, have to recover the pieces of cultural patrimony they have been stripped of. It even had the audacity to suggest that claims before 2007 are not valid, but that is only because that is the year Germany CHOSE to ratify the UN Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Germany has the money and the power to make its own rules and force disenfranchised countries to abide by them. I hope that countries like Guatemala, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Colombia in the future will share similar successes with Peru and Mexico and that all will continue to push back against these oppressive and unreasonable guidelines set by German law.

This graph shows countries/regions’ share of global GDP. Note Germany’s percentage of 4.54%, while Mexico is the only one of the Latin American countries discussed today that even registers here, at 1.54%. This is just a further illustration of Germany’s significantly greater economic advantage. (Image source: https://bit.ly/2lyEhzH)

***Just added 11/9/18***

Video of the repatriation with background information

https://youtu.be/CvGuli-0g1s

______________________________________________________________________________

Works Cited/Learn more

López: https://memoriarobada.ojo-publico.com/investigaciones/diplomats-and-collectors-under-suspicion-in-the-trafficking-of-latin-american-art/

Mashberg: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/arts/design/antiquities-dealer-leonardo-patterson-faces-new-criminal-charges.html

Yates: https://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/case-studies/maya-fresco-fake/

[newssplashy]

“Why FG Can’t Seize My Assets In Nigeria, US, UK, Dubai”- Ekweremadu Tells Court

The Deputy Senate President, Mr. Ike Ekweremadu, on Tuesday, challenged the powers of the Federal High Court in Abuja to grant interim ownership of his 22 properties to the Federal Government.

Ekweremadu, via a motion he filed through his lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, maintained that under the 1999 Constitution, as amended, the high court, lacked the jurisdiction to entertain and exercise judicial powers in matter related to, connected with and arising from the Code of Conduct and Declaration of Assets.

It will be recalled that FG had in an ex-parte motion marked FHC/ABJ/CS/284/2018, applied for an interim order temporarily attaching/forfeiting Ekweremadu’s properties to it, pending the conclusion of further inquiry/investigation by the Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property and/or possible arraignment of the Respondent.

Nine of the properties FG asked the court to freeze because they were not declared by the embattled lawmaker, are in Abuja; two of them in London, the United Kingdom; eight in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates; and three in Florida, the United States.

FG predicated the motion on section 330 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, section 8 of the Recovery of Public Property (Special Provisions) Act, section 44 (2) (K) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

However, Ekweremadu, in his counter-motion, told the court that the Chief Okoi Obono-Oblah led Special Presidential Investigation Panel that is moving to seize his properties for the government “is an illegal body”, saying it was not created under any law made by the National Assembly.

“The so called Special Panel was never Gazetted in any publication in the Federal Government of Nigeria Gazette. The President and Commander-in-Chief never inaugurated any panel anytime and anywhere in Nigeria”, he argued.

He contended that the Panel lacked the locus standi, competence and legal vires to receive complaints, investigate and initiate legal proceedings in matters connected with assets he declared to the Code of Conduct Bureau in 2007 and 2015.

“The Constitution of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) has laid down a set of guidelines for the behaviour of public officers. It is known as the Code of Conduct, which is contained in the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution.

“The Code of Conduct Bureau is an institution created by the Constitution and charged with ensuring compliance with the Code; whilst the Code of Conduct Tribunal is responsible for enforcing it.

“It is important to invite the court’s attention to the fact that the Recovery of Public Property (Special Provision) Act, CAP R4, LFN, 2004 gives jurisdiction to the Federal High Court under Section 2(2)b which is not only inconsistent with the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act but inconsistent with section 251 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which did not include code of conduct matters under the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court

We refer to Trade Bank Plc vs Lagos Island Local Govt (2003) supra.

“My Lord, we submit that the constitution has already provided for the body to undertake this investigation and prosecution of offences related to and connected with asset declaration.

It has done so and we are therefore bound to observe it under the doctrine of covering the field.

“This sole panel has no power to receive complaints, investigate and initiate criminal proceedings against the respondent concerning issues of Assets by a public officer.

“We submit that the Federal High Court is a special court with limited jurisdiction as contained in Section 251 of the 1999 Constitution.

“Violating the Code of Conduct for Public Officers is not one of the matters in respect of which jurisdiction has been conferred on the Federal High Court under Section 251 of the Constitution.

“We urge the Court to dismiss the Ex-parte application filed in the name of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.

While refuting allegation that he did not declare all his assets, Ekweremadu, in a nine paragraphed affidavit deposed to by one John Amoke, alleged that contents of a Will he lodged at the Probate Registry of the High Court of Justice of Enugu State, was tampered with and unlawfully altered by retired Chief Judge of the state, Justice Innocent Azubike Umezulike.

He said the Obono-Oblah led Panel never notified him of its investigation of petition the retired CJ filed against him based on his distorted Will, saying he was never at any time, queried by the CCB concerning any discrepancy in assets he declared before it.

Consequently, Ekweremadu, prayed the court to dismiss FG’s ex-parte motion for being incompetent.

Meantime, FG, on Tuesday, argued that Ekweremadu lacked the right to be heard by the court since its application was brought ex-parte with the aim of preserving all the assets in issue.

FG’s lawyer, Mr. Bala Dakum who is from the chambers of Mr. Festus Keyamo, SAN, argued that the fact Ekweremadu got wind of motion to freeze his assets, did not grant him the entitlement to be heard.

More so, FG, via its own five-paragraphed affidavit that was deposed to by one Yohanna Shankuk, alleged that Ekweremandu has already sold some of the properties in question.

It said Ekweremadu’s motion was only “a delay tactics to frustrate the substance of this suit”, saying “there are reports that the Respondent is already hurriedly selling off the assets”.

FG said its motion was to stop the Respondent “from dissipating the assets in question whilst investigations are ongoing”.

Justice Binta Nyako subsequently fixed April 26 to determine whether or not Ekweremandu should be heard before the court could grant ex-parte orders with regards to the assets in dispute.

Assets FG wants the court to freeze over Ekweremadu’s alleged failure to declare them, are located at No. 11, Evans Enwerem Street, Apo Legislative Quarters, Apo, Abuja, Plot 2633 Kyami, Abuja, Housing Estate (Plot 1106 CRD, Cadastral Zone 07-07, Lugbe, Abuja, Plot 2782 Asokoro Extension, Abuja, Houses at Citi Park Estate, Gwagwalada, Abuja, Plot 1474 Cadastral Zone BD6, Mabushi, Abuja, Congress Court, Abuja, Flat 1, Block D25, Athletics Street, (24th Street) Games Village, Abuja and Plot 66, 64 Crescent, Gwarimpa Estate, Abuja.

Those in London are Flat 4 Varsity Court, Harmer Street, WIH 4NW, London, 52 Ayleston Avenue, NW6 7AB, London.

Other properties in Dubai and USA are; Room 1903, The Address Hotel, Downtown Dubai, The Address Boulevard, 3901, Dubai, 2 Flats of Burij Side Boulevard (the signature), Dubai, Emirate Gardens Apartment No. EGG1/1/114, Dubai, Emirate Gardens Apartment No. EGG1/115, Dubai, Apartment No. DFB/12/B 1204, Park Towers, Dubai, Flat 3604, MAG214, Dubai and Villa No 148, Maeen 1, The Lakes Emirates Hills, Dubai.

As well as 4507 Stella Street, Bellavida Estate Kissime, Florida, USA, 2747 Club Cortile Circle, Kissime, Florida, USA and 2763 Club Cortile Circle, Kissime, Florida, USA.

The post “Why FG Can’t Seize My Assets In Nigeria, US, UK, Dubai”- Ekweremadu Tells Court appeared first on Naijaloaded | Nigeria's Most Visited Music & Entertainment Website.

source https://www.newssplashy.com/2018/04/why-fg-cant-seize-my-assets-in-nigeria.html

[apsbicepstraining]

From dream to nightmare: when your sperm donor has secrets

Having a newborn by sperm donation is an intensely personal and emotional process. So what happens when you discover that interested donors has a genetic health agitation?

Sperm donor 9623 searched good on paper. An IQ of 160. A bachelors-at-arms degree in neuroscience, a masters in artificial intelligence, en route to a PhD in neuroscience engineering. A joy for crystallography, algorithm and fitness. Ontario couple Elizabeth Hanson and Angela Collins thought they had obtained the perfect parent for their baby.

Seven times after their son was carry, Collins and Hanson discovered that donor 9623 was a college dropout with schizophrenia, a egocentric personality disorder and a criminal record. He had spent eight months in prison for burglary, and 10 years on probation.

The sperm bank had inadvertently included the donors refer, Christian Aggeles, in an email to the couple. A Google search did the residual. His stepfather had vouched in court that Aggeless psychotic chapters embarked aged 19, well before he started donating in Georgia. Aggeless sperm led to the birth of at least 36 children worldwide.

It was like a dream shifted nightmare in an instant, said Collins. The couple, alongside at least three other lineages, have filed suits against the Georgia-based seman bank, Xytex Corporation, which too afforded sperm to British pairs. Xytex disavows wrongdoing.

Such examples are not unique. Like Collins, Hanson and their son, numerous lineages and individuals are now coming to terms with vital information that their donors withheld.

The forks of such discoveries can be gargantuan. The most important entity to me is[ my son] potentially facing a extremely debilitating life-style, Collins says. I felt like I was hoaxed by Xytex and I flunked my son for having opted Xytex. In hindsight, a hitchhiker on the side of the road would have been a far more responsible alternative for designing a child.

Lineages have filed litigations against the Georgia-based seman bank, Xytex Corporation. Picture: David Goldman/ AP

What level of probability do Aggeless genes consult? The structure of mental health diseases is complex. The genetic ingredient of schizophrenia, shows Professor Cathryn Lewis, prof of genetic epidemiology and statistics at Kings College London, is not a single gene, but is compounded across many genes. There are likely to be thousands of inherited variants that verify peril of schizophrenia. Each change somewhat increases or declines our jeopardy, but none of them alone will enable us to predict whether someone is likely to develop schizophrenia.

Even arousing brand-new findings in the C4 gene expect careful interpretation. Its a single piece in a large genetic jigsaw riddle, Lewis says. Testing one gene tells us anything about private individuals risk of developing schizophrenia.

Mental health conditions too manifest a mix of interacting environment and social causes. Not to mention that many people with schizophrenia respond to treatment and live full, productive lives.

Donor anonymity was abolished in the UK in 2005. Donor-conceived offspring are now legally entitled, at the age of 18, to information on their donors identity. Nonetheless, this was not retrospectively exerted: those imagined before April 2005( thats 21,000 people born between 1991 and 2004 alone) cannot identify their donor unless interested donors steps forward willingly. Some are never even told they were donor-conceived in the first place.

Tyler Blackwell discovered as a boy in Maryland that he has 35 half-siblings. His second astonish: using the same condition that his donor leader, John( not his real mention) has not been able to uncovered. Johns sister received the Blackwells through a family genealogy website. It transpired that John, who had not replied to their mail, had an aortic aneurysm, which had ruptured at the age of 43. He had existed. At least three other family members were similarly altered. Tyler appreciated a cardiologist as a precaution, was diagnosed with an aneurysm and underwent surgery. Without an operation on an aneurysm of this kind, the mortality from severance is up to 97%. When sever arises, patients often die within six hours. There is no one who knew about it, said his mother of the sperm bank committed. If I could foretell the future, I would have picked a different donor.

Financial motivations could underlie some instances of deception. Nonetheless, the UKs Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority ( HFEA ) defines the limit for sperm donors at 35 per clinic visit and egg donors at 750 per hertz of subscription, plus expenses. These limits, it territory, is also intended to reward altruism and depres compulsion. Rules vary internationally. One California cryobank repays your time and expenditures with compensation of up to $1,500/ month with periodic motivations such as movie tickets or talent credentials for additional meter and exertion expended by participants.

Danish sperms donor 7042 unwittingly passed on neurofibromatosis to at least 11 of his children, after his sperm was used in clinics across the US, Canada, Belgium, Greece, Spain, Thailand and the UK. Neurofibromatosis is associated with mentality and nerve cancers, bone deformities, visual impairment, high blood pressure and discover difficulties. Offspring have a 50% threat of acquiring it. Denmark has since mandated that donor sperm can be used in a maximum of 12 inseminations. In the UK , no more than 10 houses can be created using egg or sperm from a single donor. Donated eggs are not risk-free, but sperm donors typically have more offspring who can pass on inherited preconditions to the next generation.

There is no such thing as reproduction without gamble. Here i am, however, an ethical responsibility towards the child to be imagined and their hopeful parents. If a donor develops a genetic circumstance times after donation, “were not receiving” structure at present that executes disclosure.

Donors now must measure negative for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and syphilis, with farther screening be a primary consideration in ethnicity such as cystic fibrosis in those of Caucasian ancestry and sickle-cell sicknes in African and Afro-Caribbean populations. Guidelines state that potential donors should be assessed for ailments with a genetic component cleave palate, spina bifida, congenital nature malformations, psychosis and others but that decisions on eligibility should be individualised.

These screening regulations do not always apply to the unknown number of UK citizens who travel abroad to find donors, utilization unlicensed clinics or buy home-insemination paraphernaliums online. Although psychological evaluation is required by most international authorities, this will not bar donors who have not yet developed evidences of a serious mental health issues disorder. For them, the diagnostic implement is time.

Genetic screening is more cheap and comprehensive than ever before. So, should we turn away from the donors account and towards the laboratory? Allan Pacey, professor of andrology at the University of Sheffield, is distrustful. I fantasize the perfect genome probably doesnt prevail, so its truly a question of where the line should be drawn. Only about 4% of all those who come forward to be sperm donors are admitted. If we were to impose a whole new change of exclusion criteria based on theoretical threats, it is possible there wont be any sperm donors at all.

Frozen sperm stored in a sperm bank. Image: monkeybusinessimages/ Getty Images/ iStockphoto

With improved screening, donors might be diagnosed with genetic ailments that would have remained undiscovered for ever, or are untreatable. Perhaps there is an controversy for not knowing.

Kevin, who were working in photography in London, is not just a donor-conceived person but a donor himself. He believes that prospective mothers should know as much as possible about the donors medical history. But there is a level where you have to draw the line, and say were no longer causing designer babies here, he adds.

He understands the distress of Elizabeth Hanson and Angela Collins, yet concern about speaking too much into particular case. Its a shame if parties tell it overshadow the industry and take it to be some sort of wide-reaching fraud. It is one floor. Every daytime there are lots of children being born to couples who have fertility problems and thats much more important to remember.

Eleven offspring have been born from his gifts. Why did he donate? I wouldnt be here if someone hadnt donated. Soul did that and thats why I am here.

Jess Cresswell discovered aged 28 that she was donor-conceived. Seven years later, she still does not know who her biological father is, but appears her parents established her best available life we are able to. Since some of her own family medical record is missing, how does she feel about donor screening?

I think they should be screened but I also considered that, just because they have some kind of hereditary condition, they shouldnt necessarily be excluded. Its the parents discretion; some people would rather have a child knowing theres a risk of picking something up than not, if that was their alone option.

It is now easier than ever for donor-conceived parties to find their genetic house. The US Donor Sibling Registry has helped connect more than 10,900 parties with their half-siblings and/ or their donors. Nearly 70% of those who sign up match with a biological relative, and virtually 80% of these working groups pair instant. The UK has a Donor Sibling Link site.

Direct-to-consumer genetic tests have revolutionised this room. In 2005, a 15 -year-old moved a saliva sample to an online service, had his genetic code uploaded, use a tracking website and met his biological father 10 weeks later. Kevin met a half-sister through a donor-sibling registry and two half-siblings through parentage places. He later unwittingly discovered some of his donors items. Two hours on, Google divulged his donors epithet. The two have since stayed in contact.

One last occasion: Aggeles received mental health therapy and picked up a degree in cognitive discipline two decades after he firstly registered at university. He is now working on a masters in artificial intelligence.

The post From dream to nightmare: when your sperm donor has secrets appeared first on apsbicepstraining.com.

from WordPress http://ift.tt/2jbB4t9 via IFTTT