#Mempool

[crypto28ro]

Dynamic Fee Adjustment Algorithms: Algoritmi pentru Tranzacții Optimizate

Introducere În rețeaua Bitcoin, costurile de tranzacționare sunt determinate în mare măsură de comisioanele plătite de utilizatori pentru a include tranzacțiile în blocuri. Cu cât rețeaua este mai aglomerată și spațiul disponibil în blocuri este mai limitat, cu atât comisioanele cresc, influențând timpii de confirmare și experiența utilizatorilor. În acest context, optimizarea costurilor de…

[christophbergmann]

Ein neuer Angriff auf Lightning ersetzt unbestätigte Transaktionen und schadet Routing-Nodes

Ein neuer Angriff auf Lightning ersetzt unbestätigte Transaktionen und schadet Routing-Nodes Es gibt wieder einen Lightning-Bug. Der Angriff ist, je nach Experte, harmlos bis schwer, und die Schutzmaßnahmen, die alle Lightning-Clients ergriffen haben, nutzlos bis durchgreifend. Die Fachleute sind sich also noch uneins -- doch interessant ist der Angriff allemal.

Es gibt wieder einen Lightning-Bug. Der Angriff ist, je nach Experte, harmlos bis schwer, und die Schutzmaßnahmen, die alle Lightning-Clients ergriffen haben, nutzlos bis durchgreifend. Die Fachleute sind sich also noch uneins — doch interessant ist der Angriff allemal. Continue reading Untitled

[bitcoinversed]

Bitcoin Network Facing Congestion with Over 550K Unconfirmed Transactions

The Bitcoin (BTC) network is currently experiencing severe congestion, with mempool data revealing a whopping 560,000 unconfirmed transactions. Memory usage has risen to 1 GB, and transaction fees have reached a notable high of over 20 Sat/vB.

This recent bottleneck is being attributed by experts to a wave of “fomo” or the fear of missing out, predominantly caused by the minting of sats. Simultaneously, there’s notable frenzy surrounding Ordinals and BRC-20, even if it has died down somewhat.

All in, this high demand has pushed the average block mining time to 10.9 minutes, indicating that miners are finding it challenging to cater to the surge in demand, even though the difficulty adjustment eased yesterday.

Read More at Bitcoin Versed

[tokenlauncher]

“The DeFi Game Changer on Solana: Unlocking Unprecedented Opportunities”

Introduction

In the dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi), new platforms and innovations are constantly reshaping the landscape. Among these, Solana has emerged as a game-changer, offering unparalleled speed, low costs, and robust scalability. This blog delves into how Solana is revolutionizing DeFi, why it stands out from other blockchain platforms, and what this means for investors, developers, and users.

What is Solana?

Solana is a high-performance blockchain designed to support decentralized applications and cryptocurrencies. Launched in 2020, it addresses some of the most significant challenges in blockchain technology, such as scalability, speed, and high transaction costs. Solana’s architecture allows it to process thousands of transactions per second (TPS) at a fraction of the cost of other platforms.

Why Solana is a DeFi Game Changer

1. High-Speed Transactions

One of Solana’s most remarkable features is its transaction speed. Solana can handle over 65,000 transactions per second (TPS), far exceeding the capabilities of many other blockchains, including Ethereum. This high throughput is achieved through its unique Proof of History (PoH) consensus mechanism, which timestamps transactions, allowing them to be processed quickly and efficiently.

2. Low Transaction Fees

Transaction fees on Solana are incredibly low, often less than a fraction of a cent. This affordability is crucial for DeFi applications, where high transaction volumes can lead to significant costs on other platforms. Low fees make Solana accessible to a broader range of users and developers, promoting more widespread adoption of DeFi solutions.

3. Scalability

Solana’s architecture is designed to scale without compromising performance. This scalability ensures that as the number of users and applications on the platform grows, Solana can handle the increased load without experiencing slowdowns or high fees. This feature is essential for DeFi projects that require reliable and consistent performance.

4. Robust Security

Security is a top priority for any blockchain platform, and Solana is no exception. It employs advanced cryptographic techniques to ensure that transactions are secure and tamper-proof. This high level of security is critical for DeFi applications, where the integrity of financial transactions is paramount.

Key Innovations Driving Solana’s Success in DeFi

Proof of History (PoH)

Solana’s Proof of History (PoH) is a novel consensus mechanism that timestamps transactions before they are processed. This method creates a historical record that proves that transactions have occurred in a specific sequence, enhancing the efficiency and speed of the network. PoH reduces the computational burden on validators, allowing Solana to achieve high throughput and low latency.

Tower BFT

Tower Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) is Solana’s implementation of a consensus algorithm designed to maximize speed and security. Tower BFT leverages the synchronized clock provided by PoH to achieve consensus quickly and efficiently. This approach ensures that the network remains secure and resilient, even as it scales.

Sealevel

Sealevel is Solana’s parallel processing engine that enables the simultaneous execution of thousands of smart contracts. Unlike other blockchains, where smart contracts often face bottlenecks due to limited processing capacity, Sealevel ensures that Solana can handle multiple contracts concurrently. This capability is crucial for the development of complex DeFi applications that require high performance and reliability.

Gulf Stream

Gulf Stream is Solana’s mempool-less transaction forwarding protocol. It enables validators to forward transactions to the next set of validators before the current set of transactions is finalized. This feature reduces confirmation times, enhances the network’s efficiency, and supports high transaction throughput.

Solana’s DeFi Ecosystem

Leading DeFi Projects on Solana

Solana’s ecosystem is rapidly expanding, with numerous DeFi projects leveraging its unique features. Some of the leading DeFi projects on Solana include:

Serum: A decentralized exchange (DEX) that offers lightning-fast trading and low transaction fees. Serum is built on Solana and provides a fully on-chain order book, enabling users to trade assets efficiently and securely.

Raydium: An automated market maker (AMM) and liquidity provider built on Solana. Raydium integrates with Serum’s order book, allowing users to access deep liquidity and trade at competitive prices.

Saber: A cross-chain stablecoin exchange that facilitates seamless trading of stablecoins across different blockchains. Saber leverages Solana’s speed and low fees to provide an efficient and cost-effective stablecoin trading experience.

Mango Markets: A decentralized trading platform that combines the features of a DEX and a lending protocol. Mango Markets offers leverage trading, lending, and borrowing, all powered by Solana’s high-speed infrastructure.

The Future of DeFi on Solana

The future of DeFi on Solana looks incredibly promising, with several factors driving its continued growth and success:

Growing Developer Community: Solana’s developer-friendly environment and comprehensive resources attract a growing community of developers. This community is constantly innovating and creating new DeFi applications, contributing to the platform’s vibrant ecosystem.

Strategic Partnerships: Solana has established strategic partnerships with major players in the crypto and tech industries. These partnerships provide additional resources, support, and credibility, driving further adoption of Solana-based DeFi solutions.

Cross-Chain Interoperability: Solana is actively working on cross-chain interoperability, enabling seamless integration with other blockchain networks. This capability will enhance the utility of Solana-based DeFi applications and attract more users to the platform.

Institutional Adoption: As DeFi continues to gain mainstream acceptance, institutional investors are increasingly looking to platforms like Solana. Its high performance, low costs, and robust security make it an attractive option for institutional use cases.

How to Get Started with DeFi on Solana

Step-by-Step Guide

Set Up a Solana Wallet: To interact with DeFi applications on Solana, you’ll need a compatible wallet. Popular options include Phantom, Sollet, and Solflare. These wallets provide a user-friendly interface for managing your SOL tokens and interacting with DeFi protocols.

Purchase SOL Tokens: SOL is the native cryptocurrency of the Solana network. You’ll need SOL tokens to pay for transaction fees and interact with DeFi applications. You can purchase SOL on major cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and FTX.

Explore Solana DeFi Projects: Once you have SOL tokens in your wallet, you can start exploring the various DeFi projects on Solana. Visit platforms like Serum, Raydium, Saber, and Mango Markets to see what they offer and how you can benefit from their services.

Provide Liquidity: Many DeFi protocols on Solana offer opportunities to provide liquidity and earn rewards. By depositing your assets into liquidity pools, you can earn a share of the trading fees generated by the protocol.

Participate in Governance: Some Solana-based DeFi projects allow token holders to participate in governance decisions. By staking your tokens and voting on proposals, you can have a say in the future development and direction of the project.

Conclusion

Solana is undoubtedly a game-changer in the DeFi space, offering unparalleled speed, low costs, scalability, and security. Its innovative features and growing ecosystem make it an ideal platform for developers, investors, and users looking to leverage the benefits of decentralized finance. As the DeFi landscape continues to evolve, Solana is well-positioned to lead the charge, unlocking unprecedented opportunities for financial innovation and inclusion.

Whether you’re a developer looking to build the next big DeFi application or an investor seeking high-growth opportunities, Solana offers a compelling and exciting path forward. Dive into the world of Solana and discover how it’s transforming the future of decentralized finance.

[danieldavidreitberg]

From Amateur Hour to Organized Crime: The Growing Sophistication of Sandwich Bot Networks

Remember the early days of DeFi, when sandwich bots were clumsy scripts written by hobbyists, easily detectable and swatted away? Those days are gone. The landscape of MEV (Miner Extractable Value) exploitation has evolved into a sophisticated ecosystem, with well-organized networks employing cutting-edge tools and coordinated strategies to fleece unsuspecting users.

From Solo Players to Syndicates

Gone are the days of lone bots lurking in the mempool. Today, MEV teams operate like criminal enterprises, pooling resources, expertise, and infrastructure to maximize their gains. These teams leverage:

Advanced bots: Employing AI and machine learning, these bots can predict market movements, identify profitable opportunities, and execute complex arbitrage strategies in milliseconds.

Flash loan manipulation: Borrowing vast sums instantly, these teams manipulate markets, trigger liquidations, and extract hefty profits before disappearing.

Front-running bots: These bots predict user actions and place transactions ahead, denying them the intended price and reaping the difference.

Distributed networks: Operating across multiple nodes and blockchains, these networks are harder to detect and disrupt.

The Stakes are High

The impact of these organized attacks extends far beyond individual losses:

Market manipulation: By manipulating prices, these bots distort markets, creating unfair advantages and undermining trust in DeFi.

Exacerbated volatility: Their rapid arbitrage activity fuels market volatility, discouraging participation and hindering adoption.

Centralization concerns: Large, well-resourced teams gain an unfair edge, raising concerns about centralization within DeFi.

Fighting Back

The good news is, that the fight against organized MEV exploitation is not one-sided. Here are some promising developments:

MEV-resistant protocols: Projects like Flashbots and MEV Boost offer infrastructure to mitigate certain MEV exploits.

Layer 2 scaling: Solutions like Optimism and Arbitrum aim to reduce MEV by processing transactions off-chain.

Collaboration and research: Ongoing research and collaboration between developers, users, and researchers aim to develop fairer and more efficient mechanisms for distributing MEV rewards.

The Future of MEV

The battle against organized MEV networks is an ongoing one, requiring constant vigilance and adaptation. By staying informed, supporting responsible projects, and advocating for fair and transparent DeFi, we can ensure that this revolutionary technology benefits everyone, not just the digital robber barons of the mempool.

[arbitcoin]

Zachxbt يتهم حديقة تمويل لغسل صناديق اختراق Bybit

تكشف البيانات الحديثة من تحليلات الكثبان الرملية أن تمويل الحدائق قد شهدت نموًا ملحوظًا في منصتها التي تشهدها مخططات مقايضات BTC ، وتفاعلات المستخدم ، والإجمالي الرسوم التي تم جمعها خلال الربع الثاني من عام 2025 مقارنة بـ Q1. والجدير بالذكر أن المنصة التي عرضت تمويل الحديقة قد سهلت حجم BTC إجمالي قدره 24،984 BTC ، وترجم إلى أكثر من 1.5 مليار دولار في 40،571 مقايضة ذرية. كما تراكمت 40.11 BTC في الرسوم ، مع أكبر تبادل واحد على منصتها التي تصل إلى 10 BTC.وضعت البيانات لهم على أنها "أسرع جسر بيتكوين" ، وهو نمو المثير للإعجاب في Garden Finance في النصف الأول من عام 2025 موضح بوضوح في مخططات تحليل الكثبان الرملية. ومع ذلك ، فإن هذه الزيادة لم تمر دون أن يلاحظها أحد. أثارت ZachxBT الشكوك ، حتى اتهام حديقة تمويل تمكين غسل الأموال المرتبطة بسرقات التشفير ، بما في ذلك الاختراق البالغ 1.4 مليار دولار. قراءة كي لفهم القصة بأكملها.ادعاء Zachxbt في تمويل الحديقة ظهرت الادعاءات الأخيرة ضد تمويل الحديقة في تطور مفاجئ يتبعه Jaz Gulati ، مؤسس المنصة. في المنشور السابق ، أبرز نجاحه من خلال مشاركة صورة للرسوم التي تم جمعها في الأسبوع الأول من يونيو. ومن المثير للاهتمام أن اسمًا معروفًا في قطاع التشفير ، Zachxbt ، قد ظهر. كما هو المتهم بروتوكول توليد أكثر من 80 ٪ من رسومه الحديثة من خلال غسل الأموال ، بمساعدة من الغابات الصينية المتصلة بمجموعة لازاروس. أثارت هذه المطالبة التي قدمها محقق أونشين ، الذي صنع في X في وقت سابق اليوم في نهاية الأسبوع الثالث من يونيو ، اهتمامًا كبيرًا داخل مجتمع التشفير. نظرًا لأن هذا يثير أسئلة شديدة وعاجلة حول جدارة المنصات اللامركزية. مؤسس تمويل الحديقة ينكر مزاعم ويعتبر لا أساس لهفي أعقاب مزاعم Zachxbt ، استجاب Jaz Gulati ، مؤسس Garden Finance ، بالإشارة إلى وظيفة سابقة حيث ذكر أنهم تلقوا 30 BTC قبل حدوث اختراق Bybit. أرفق أ لقطة شاشة من هذا المنشور من Q4 2024 لدعم مطالبته.على الرغم من دفاع جولاتي ، تضاعف زاككسبتي ، تشير إلى اختراقات أخرى تتعلق بـ DPRK ، بما في ذلك حادثة Wazirx ، التي وقعت قبل اختراق Bybit. كما تساءل عن شرعية تمويل الحديقة ، ووصفها بأنها "جسر غير مركزي مزيف". رداً على ذلك ، رفض جولاتي هذا التوصيف على أنه معلومات خاطئة ، واصفا تسمية "اللامركزية المزيفة" التي لا أساس لها من الصحة."لا مركزية مزيفة" ، مرة أ��رى مع المعلومات الخاطئة- أنا (jzgulati) 21 يونيو 2025 في وقت لاحق تعليق، زعم Zachxbt أن ممثلًا واحدًا كان يتصدر باستمرار سيولة CBBTC من Coinbase للغسيل الصينيين أثناء نقل الأموال المسروقة من Bybit. ومع ذلك ، لم يستجيب غولاتي بعد لهذا الاتهام المحدد ، على الرغم من ردوده السريعة السابقة.عضو جديد ينضم إلى البورصةبعد ثلاث ساعات من الصمت من جولاتي ، انضم مستخدم آخر ، جيمس سكور ، إلى المناقشة ، على ما يبدو لدعم جولاتي. اقترح Scaur أن أ توزيع باريتو قد ينطبق ، حيث يساهم عدد صغير من مقدمي موفري السيولة (LPS) في غالبية السيولة. وأشار إلى أن هذا لا يعني بالضرورة المركزية ؛ قد يعني ذلك ببساطة أن LP واحد فقط كان قادرًا على تلبية الطلب في ذلك الوقت.فيما يتعلق بموضوع حظر المقايضات من المصادر المخترقة ، اعترف Scaur بأنها قضية معقدة تبقى من الصعب حل.في الآونة الأخيرة ، قدم ZachxBT ضربة لدعم جيمس سكور للمنصة ، حيث انتقد مرة أخرى تمويل الحديقة بسبب افتقاره إلى اللامركزية ، مع الإشارة إلى أنه منذ أن تم رفع الحد الأقصى للمقايضات الكبيرة إلى 10 CBBTC ، كان كيانًا واحدًا فقط يلبي طلبات لأسابيع. وأبرز أنه خارج صناديق BYBIT ، فإن المنصة لديها الحد الأدنى من النشاط ، مما يجعل من السهل اكتشاف المعاملات غير المشروعة في Mempool. مع فيضان المعاملات المتعلقة بالبيبيت منذ أبريل 2025 ، أشار إلى أنه تم تحذير الفريق من هذه القضية. نظرًا لأن الغطاء قد تم رفعه لمبادلات كبيرة مما يتيح ما يصل إلى 10 CBBTC ، فقد كان كيانًا واحدًا فقط يلبي أوامر لعدة أسابيع. أتساءل كيف يمكنك استدعاء هذا اللامركزية ...خارج صناديق Bybit ، لدى Garden الحد الأدنى من النشاط ، وبالتالي فمن السهل للغاية التقاط هذا غير المشروع ...- ZachxBT (ZachxBT) 21 يونيو 2025 اقترح أنه إذا لم يتمكنوا من منع هذه المعاملات ، فيجب عليهم إعادة الرسوم التي تم إنشاؤها وتعطيل مقايضات أكبر ، بدلاً من التفاخر برسومهم مع معرفة أصول��م. بالإضافة إلى ذلك ، ذكر أن 30 BTC في الرسوم يرجع إلى حد كبير إلى حملة زراعة Airdrop من أوائل عام 2024.لقد تصاعد التبادل الساخن للردود على X منذ ذلك الحين إلى خلاف عام ، لكن الادعاء يبدو قويًا قادمًا من نتائج Zachxbt. إذا استمرت البورصة ، فقد يؤدي ذلك إلى تدقيق قانوني لتمويل الحديقة.

[zakjasper]

MEV Bots vs. Traditional Crypto Trading Bots: What’s the Difference?

In the fast-evolving world of crypto trading automation, not all bots are created equal. Two distinct categories have gained significant traction—Traditional Crypto Trading Bots and MEV (Miner Extractable Value) Bots. While both operate autonomously and aim to generate profit, the way they work, the strategies they use, and even their ethical implications diverge drastically.

If you're building a trading automation system or investing in crypto bot development, understanding the key differences between MEV bot development and traditional bots is essential. Let’s dive into their fundamentals, how they function, and what makes them unique.

What Is a Traditional Crypto Trading Bot?

Traditional crypto trading bots are software programs designed to automate trading activities on centralized or decentralized exchanges based on predefined strategies. These bots remove emotion and manual work from the trading process, enabling users to execute trades 24/7 based on market signals, indicators, or specific triggers.

Common Strategies Used by Traditional Bots:

Market Making: Placing simultaneous buy and sell orders to profit from the bid-ask spread.

Arbitrage: Buying an asset at a lower price on one exchange and selling it at a higher price on another.

Trend Following: Using indicators like RSI, MACD, or moving averages to enter trades aligned with market trends.

Grid Trading: Placing buy and sell orders at fixed intervals above and below a set price to capture volatility.

These bots operate within the rules of the market and do not rely on manipulating transaction ordering or blockchain-level mechanics.

What Is an MEV Bot?

MEV bots, on the other hand, are far more advanced and operate on a deeper layer of the blockchain. MEV (Miner Extractable Value) refers to the additional profits that a block proposer or validator can extract by manipulating the order and inclusion of transactions in a block.

MEV Bots Exploit:

Front-running: Detecting a profitable transaction in the mempool and placing a similar trade with a higher gas fee to be executed first.

Back-running: Placing a trade right after a known large transaction to take advantage of price changes.

Sandwich attacks: Surrounding a user's transaction with buy and sell orders to exploit slippage.

Liquidation sniping: Monitoring lending platforms for positions nearing liquidation and front-running them to profit from the event.

These bots interact directly with the Ethereum mempool, simulate transaction outcomes, and may submit bundles through systems like Flashbots to ensure priority inclusion without getting outbid in gas wars.

Key Differences Between MEV Bots and Traditional Trading Bots

1. Target Environments

Traditional Bots: Operate on both centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Binance or Coinbase, and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap or PancakeSwap.

MEV Bots: Exclusively operate on decentralized networks, particularly Ethereum and other EVM-compatible chains where transaction ordering is crucial.

2. Strategy Complexity

Traditional Bots: Rely on technical indicators, API data, and predictable algorithms. The logic is rule-based and relatively straightforward.

MEV Bots: Use real-time mempool scanning, smart contract simulation, and complex on-chain logic. These bots require a deeper understanding of blockchain mechanics and transaction ordering.

3. Infrastructure Requirements

Traditional Bots: Can be hosted on regular cloud servers and utilize exchange APIs.

MEV Bots: Require low-latency access to the mempool, Flashbots relays, blockchain simulators, and custom RPC endpoints to be competitive.

4. Ethical and Regulatory Implications

Traditional Bots: Generally considered fair tools used by traders of all levels.

MEV Bots: Can be controversial. Sandwich attacks and front-running may negatively affect unsuspecting users and raise ethical questions, although some MEV strategies (like arbitrage or liquidation) are neutral or beneficial to network stability.

5. Profit Models

Traditional Bots: Profit from price movement and trade execution efficiency.

MEV Bots: Profit from transaction ordering—capitalizing on timing, miner/validator relationships, and the architecture of DeFi protocols.

Challenges in MEV Bot Development

Creating a successful MEV bot is not a trivial task. Developers face challenges like:

Race conditions: Competing with dozens of bots for the same opportunity.

Simulation accuracy: Transactions must be tested in simulators to predict the outcome and avoid loss.

Block reordering: Risk of transactions being dropped, reordered, or reverted.

Cost of failure: Failed MEV attempts can result in wasted gas and unrecoverable losses.

Regulatory uncertainty: The legality of some MEV strategies is still a gray area.

In contrast, traditional bots face challenges like API rate limits, latency, and exchange bans, but typically not the same level of technical or ethical risk.

Flashbots: Leveling the Playing Field for MEV

One of the most notable innovations in the MEV ecosystem is Flashbots, an organization that introduced a transparent and permissionless way to access MEV opportunities. By enabling bots to send bundled transactions directly to miners/validators instead of broadcasting to the public mempool, Flashbots reduces spam and gas bidding wars, while offering a structured channel for MEV extraction.

Traditional bots have no equivalent of Flashbots because they operate entirely within standard exchange environments.

The Future of Trading Bots in Crypto

As the cryptocurrency landscape matures, the role of trading bots is expected to evolve in both scale and sophistication. Traditional bots will likely see broader adoption among institutional investors and retail traders who seek consistency and automation in their trading strategies. With improvements in artificial intelligence and machine learning, these bots may become increasingly adaptive—capable of analyzing sentiment, reacting to macroeconomic news, and fine-tuning their strategies in real time. Their integration with advanced trading terminals and portfolio management tools will also make them indispensable in managing risk and optimizing returns in both bull and bear markets.

MEV bots, on the other hand, will continue to occupy a more specialized niche within the DeFi ecosystem. The future of these bots is closely tied to the evolution of blockchain infrastructure itself. As Ethereum moves further into its post-Merge era with innovations like proposer-builder separation (PBS) and encrypted mempools, the methods used by MEV bots may need to adapt significantly. These changes could either limit predatory behavior or redefine what types of MEV opportunities are viable. Additionally, new chains and layer-2 networks may open up fresh frontiers for MEV strategies, prompting bot developers to explore cross-chain implementations and interoperable extraction techniques.

Conclusion

The comparison between MEV bots and traditional crypto trading bots reveals two vastly different approaches to automated trading in the blockchain space. While both aim to generate profit through automation, the environments they operate in, the strategies they deploy, and the technical complexities they handle are worlds apart. Traditional bots offer a relatively straightforward path to automation for traders, making them ideal for those focused on consistent, rule-based strategies using available exchange data. MEV bots, in contrast, operate on a deeper, more aggressive layer of blockchain mechanics—taking advantage of transaction ordering, mempool analysis, and smart contract behavior to extract value, often in milliseconds.

Understanding the difference is more than just a technical comparison—it’s about recognizing the evolving dynamics of the crypto market itself. As blockchain infrastructure and decentralized finance continue to develop, the tools we use to interact with these systems must also adapt. Whether you’re a developer aiming to build the next powerful trading algorithm or a trader looking to leverage automation for better results, knowing where MEV bots diverge from traditional bots can guide your decisions and shape your strategies. The world of crypto bots is vast and rapidly evolving, and choosing the right path depends on your technical skills, ethical stance, and vision for the future of trading.

[brogx]

BROGX Lacak Kemajuan Legislasi Bitcoin di Ohio, Hak Swakustodi Aset Kripto Dapat Pengakuan Hukum

Baru-baru ini, Bitcoin Rights Bill HB 116 di negara bagian Ohio disetujui oleh Komite Teknologi dan Inovasi DPR dengan suara bulat 13:0. RUU ini menetapkan hak individu atas swakustodi (self-custody), memberikan pengecualian regulasi untuk penambangan dan pengoperasian node pada tingkat rumah tangga dan komersial, serta menetapkan pembebasan pajak capital gain sebesar USD 200 untuk transaksi aset digital. Legislasi ini mencakup tiga skenario utama: kepemilikan aset, pengoperasian infrastruktur on-chain, dan insentif pajak, menandakan bahwa kebijakan negara bagian telah bergeser dari model perizinan ke perlindungan hak. BROGX secara bersamaan mengoptimalkan produk, pengelolaan risiko, dan dukungan pajak untuk menghadirkan pengalaman transaksi yang sesuai dengan regulasi terbaru bagi pengguna di Amerika Utara.

Hak Swakustodi yang Diatur dalam Undang-Undang Meningkatkan Permintaan Dompet Kripto

Dengan masuknya hak swakustodi dalam hukum negara bagian, warga Ohio kini dapat secara legal menyimpan dan mengendalikan kunci privat mereka tanpa bergantung pada kustodian pihak ketiga. Hal ini mendorong proyeksi peningkatan permintaan dompet kripto. Antarmuka dompet perangkat keras BROGX telah membuka akses API, memungkinkan pengguna menghubungkan perangkat penandatanganan dingin (cold signer) langsung ke platform transaksi untuk interaksi on-chain dan penandatanganan order. Tim keamanan BROGX telah menerapkan verifikasi multi-faktor dalam proses validasi tanda tangan, menjaga keseimbangan antara prinsip kebebasan swakustodi dan akurasi penyelesaian transaksi di platform. Data on-chain menunjukkan bahwa kejelasan hak dapat secara signifikan meningkatkan jumlah alamat aktif; kapasitas cluster node backend BROGX telah diperluas sebesar 30% untuk menjamin stabilitas selama lonjakan siaran transaksi.

Perlindungan terhadap Penambangan dan Node Memicu Migrasi Daya Komputasi

HB 116 secara eksplisit melarang pemerintah daerah menggunakan alasan kebisingan, konsumsi energi, atau zonasi untuk membatasi penambangan kripto yang sesuai hukum. Hal ini mendorong migrasi daya komputasi (hashrate) ke wilayah dengan biaya energi rendah dan kebijakan yang mendukung. Saluran penitipan mesin tambang BROGX kini telah menyiapkan lokasi di Ohio, menyediakan layanan koneksi node siap-pakai (plug-and-play), serta menghadirkan fitur “label penambang” di sisi transaksi yang secara otomatis mengenali alamat daya komputasi baru dari negara bagian tersebut. Aktivitas node baru diperkirakan akan meningkatkan frekuensi transfer on-chain; mesin pencocokan BROGX menggunakan pemantauan mempool on-chain untuk menyesuaikan rekomendasi biaya transaksi secara dinamis, membantu pengguna mempertahankan kecepatan konfirmasi blok saat jaringan padat.

Ketentuan Bebas Pajak Memicu Aktivitas Transaksi Kecil

RUU ini menetapkan pembebasan pajak capital gain hingga 200 Dolar AS per tahun untuk aset digital, memberikan keuntungan biaya langsung bagi trader kecil. BROGX merespons dengan meluncurkan modul “Referensi Bebas Pajak” yang menghitung akumulasi keuntungan kena pajak pengguna secara real-time dan memberikan peringatan saat mendekati batas ambang, mendukung keputusan pencairan yang rasional dan bertahap. Sistem pencocokan transaksi platform juga menambahkan fitur penggabungan pesanan mikro secara massal, mencegah biaya on-chain yang tidak proporsional akibat banyaknya transaksi kecil. Berdasarkan data internal BROGX, pada minggu pengumuman kebijakan, jumlah pesanan dengan nilai transaksi di bawah 500 Dolar AS meningkat 18% dibanding minggu sebelumnya. Kurva kedalaman pasar pun menjadi lebih halus, mendukung efisiensi penemuan harga.

Langkah legislatif Ohio menjadi model potensial bagi negara bagian AS lainnya. BROGX merencanakan integrasi parameter kebijakan multinegara dalam sistem pemetaan kepatuhan, memungkinkan penyesuaian otomatis aturan dan tarif saat pengguna berpindah lokasi, memastikan kepatuhan dalam transaksi lintas negara bagian. Pusat pengendalian risiko BROGX terus memperbarui basis data reputasi alamat on-chain dan berbagi label risiko dengan node penegakan hukum tingkat negara bagian, guna mengurangi infiltrasi dana ilegal. Transparansi pada antarmuka transaksi dan integrasi kebijakan secara real-time memperkuat keunggulan teknis BROGX dalam perlombaan kepatuhan yang baru. Ke depan, BROGX akan terus mengembangkan fitur asisten pelaporan pajak, penitipan node perusahaan, dan komponen identitas on-chain, guna menyediakan ekosistem transaksi aset digital yang stabil, efisien, dan sesuai regulasi bagi pengguna global.

[zero2046-blog]

GoPlus 全球首发「区块链安全防火墙」GSM，恶意交易拦截率97%，BNB链实测效果显著

深潮 TechFlow 消息，6 月 12 日，区块链安全基础设施 GoPlus Security 今日正式发布 GSM（GoPlus Security Module）——全球首个可原生集成至公链节点的安全防护层，实现恶意交易在上链前毫秒级拦截。该技术的核心突破��：可安全嵌入区块链执行层，实现非外挂防御，具体实现方式是：将GSM直接集成至节点客户端（如BNBChain），在交易进入内存池（mempool）前进行扫描，从源头切断黑客攻击路径。 GoPlus提供了在 BNBChain进行的实测战绩，在100笔真实攻击交易回放测试中，GSM实现： – 97%攻击阻断率 – <40ms延迟（千级TPS并发下节点0崩溃） – 预防损失超$2200万 该技术将推动区块链安全从“事后补救”迈向“事前免疫”，为十亿级用户入场铺平道路。目前，GoPlus正面向全行业开放生态合作，支持…

[cryptotimesnews]

Trustless is not the same as trustworthy

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. When Satoshi wrote that “participants can be anonymous,” he also built in the assumption that the rules are enforced by software, not by people. Most of today’s decentralized exchanges keep that promise: once a trade hits the mempool, no custodian…

[finvestotech]

Quiet mempool and flat volume could mean limited fuel for Bitcoin’s breakout above $100k

[primezone003]

The Bitcoin Mempool: Relay Network Dynamics

In the last Mempool article, I went over the different kinds of relay policy filters, why they exist, and the incentives that ultimately decide how effective each class of filter is at preventing the confirmation of different classes of transactions. In this piece I’ll be looking at the dynamics of the relay network when some nodes on the network are running different relay policies compared to…

[news786hz]

The Bitcoin Mempool: Relay Network Dynamics

The Bitcoin Mempool: Relay Network Dynamics

[cryptonary]

MEV (Maximal Extractable Value): How Bots Are Profiting from Blockchain Congestion?

As blockchains grow in adoption and usage, a new and often controversial layer of complexity has emerged: Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). This phenomenon, once quietly exploited by a few savvy insiders, is now at the forefront of blockchain discourse — because it directly affects users, decentralization, and even the security of networks like Ethereum.

At its core, MEV is about who controls the order of transactions in a block — and how much value they can extract by reordering, inserting, or censoring those transactions. This article explores what MEV is, how bots are taking advantage of it, and what solutions are being proposed to combat its more harmful effects.

What Is MEV?

Maximal Extractable Value (formerly "Miner Extractable Value") refers to the maximum profit that can be earned by reordering or including certain transactions within a block, above and beyond the standard block reward and gas fees.

While it originally applied to miners who controlled block production, MEV now applies more broadly to validators, searchers, relayers, and bots—especially in proof-of-stake systems like Ethereum post-Merge.

In essence, if you can choose which transactions go into a block, and in what order, you can front-run, back-run, sandwich, or even cancel other transactions for profit.

How Do MEV Bots Work?

MEV bots scan the mempool (where pending transactions wait to be confirmed) and look for profitable opportunities. These opportunities often arise in decentralized exchanges (DEXs), lending protocols, and NFT minting events.

Common MEV Strategies:

Front-running A bot sees a large trade and quickly submits its own transaction just before it, buying the asset first and profiting from the price movement.

Back-running The bot submits a trade right after a large transaction, capitalizing on temporary price changes or arbitrage.

Sandwich Attacks A more advanced form of front- and back-running:

The bot submits a buy order just before a user’s large trade (pumping the price).

The user’s trade executes at a higher price.

The bot then sells at this inflated price, capturing the difference.

Liquidation Arbitrage On lending platforms like Aave or Compound, bots monitor undercollateralized loans. If liquidation becomes possible, bots race to submit the liquidation transaction and claim the reward.

And there are two types of blockchains, Modular Blockchains and Monolithic Chains

The Economics of MEV

In 2022 alone, over $600 million in MEV was extracted on Ethereum. Most of it went to bots and validators using custom software to optimize transaction order.

The rise of Flashbots — an organization that introduced a more "transparent" and "fair" way of handling MEV through private relay systems — made it easier for searchers to submit MEV bundles to block builders. This created a new ecosystem of actors:

Searchers find MEV opportunities and package transactions.

Relayers deliver bundles to validators.

Validators (or miners) include these transactions and earn tips.

While this system reduces gas wars and public front-running, it doesn’t eliminate MEV — it simply channels it more efficiently.

Real-World Example: Uniswap Sandwich Attack

Imagine a user tries to swap a large amount of ETH for USDC on Uniswap. A bot monitoring the mempool sees the pending transaction:

Step 1: The bot places a buy order for USDC right before the user’s swap.

Step 2: The user’s transaction executes, driving up the price.

Step 3: The bot sells the USDC back at a higher price.

The result? The user gets a worse price, and the bot walks away with a tidy profit — often hundreds or thousands of dollars per trade.

Why MEV Is a Problem

While MEV can be seen as a “natural” feature of blockchain systems, it raises several issues:

1. Unfairness to Users

Every time a user gets sandwiched or front-run, they lose money. This undermines the fairness and transparency of DeFi.

2. Congestion and Spam

MEV competition creates gas wars. Bots flood the network with transactions, driving up fees for everyone.

3. Centralization Risk

Validators who consistently extract MEV may grow disproportionately wealthy, leading to centralization of power.

4. Security Threats

Advanced MEV extraction strategies like time-bandit attacks could incentivize validators to reorganize the blockchain’s history, risking chain instability.

Solutions and Mitigations

The crypto ecosystem is actively exploring solutions to reduce the negative impact of MEV:

🛠 Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)

A concept in Ethereum’s roadmap, PBS separates the role of block proposers and block builders, preventing validators from having full control over transaction ordering.

🔒 Encrypted Mempools

Encrypted transactions prevent bots from reading and exploiting the mempool in real-time. However, this adds complexity and latency.

⚡ MEV Auctions (e.g., Flashbots)

Rather than chaotic competition, MEV opportunities are auctioned in bundles to validators. This reduces spam but doesn’t solve the core fairness issue.

🤝 Fair Ordering Protocols

Projects like Eden Network, Chainlink’s Fair Sequencing Service, and Anoma aim to enforce fairer transaction ordering rules — such as first-in-first-out (FIFO) or randomized ordering.

🌉 L2 Rollups and App-Chains

Layer 2 solutions can enforce different ordering mechanisms and reduce MEV exposure by limiting mempool visibility.

The Future of MEV: Inevitable or Optional?

Some argue that MEV is inevitable — a natural byproduct of open and permissionless markets. Others believe that with proper design, it can be reduced or redirected toward protocol-level incentives rather than predatory behaviors.

There is also growing discussion around "MEV redistribution" — using the profits from MEV to subsidize user fees or fund public goods.

In any case, as the blockchain ecosystem evolves, MEV will remain a central battleground — not just for profits, but for the integrity, fairness, and decentralization of Web3.

Conclusion

MEV represents both a technical challenge and a philosophical debate in the blockchain world. While it opens up economic opportunities for sophisticated actors, it often does so at the expense of ordinary users. As congestion rises and blockchains scale, how we deal with MEV will shape the future of decentralized finance and blockchain architecture itself.

The question is no longer “can we stop MEV?” but rather “how can we manage it in a way that protects users and aligns incentives with the goals of decentralization?”

[10bmnews]

Understanding Bitcoin IOUs | Are All BTC IOUs Shitcoins?

As Bitcoin adoption grows, the base layer is becoming increasingly expensive and more technically challenging. Block space is scarce, and fees are always expected to rise. Onboarding directly into self-custodial Bitcoin also requires unintuitive background knowledge in Bitcoin such as UTXO management, blind signing, monitoring mempool, liquidity management, fee rate calculation, etc. At the same…