The Shooting is Just the Beginning of a Wider Conspiracy Against Donald Trump
The campaign to dismantle Donald Trump is in full force. The recent shooting at the Pennsylvania rally, resulting in the death of an attendee, along with the extensive 'BlueAnon' disinformation campaign, are merely preludes to a larger, more orchestrated attack.
August 10, 2024
As highlighted in previous reports, the assassination attempt on Donald Trump is closely tied to the activities of anti-cult organizations. These groups have not only spearheaded a hate campaign, labeling Trump as the leader of a "cult" and stirring hostility towards him and his followers, but they have also manipulated the shooter through a technique known as "puzzle coding." This method is thoroughly explored in the documentary "The IMPACT," which demonstrates how similar strategies have been used to incite school shootings, deliberately fostering chaos and violence within society.
The "Bullet Trajectory" Image Circulates Widely Online
Immediately following the attempted assassination, an image began circulating online, purportedly showing the bullet's trajectory, which allegedly missed Trump’s head due to a sudden turn. However, this image is speculative and does not align with the actual timing of the shot. A detailed examination of the shooting at Trump’s Pennsylvania rally on July 13, 2024, reveals that the shooter did not intend to assassinate Trump but rather aimed to kill his supporters. The attacker continued firing at the crowd behind Trump, even after Trump ducked out of sight. Evidence indicates that the shooter followed a premeditated plan to target rally attendees, with the bullet grazing Trump’s ear being an accidental outcome.
A Broader Strategy to Discredit Trump
The rally shooting was part of a larger strategy by anti-cult organizations to undermine Trump’s political career. The goal was not to kill Trump, as his death could have potentially strengthened the Republican Party in the upcoming elections by paving the way for a new, unopposed candidate. Instead, the objective was to keep Trump alive while eroding trust in him and humiliating him in the eyes of voters.
Had the shooter intended to kill Trump, the task would have been relatively straightforward, even from a distance of 150 yards. "At 200 yards, anyone trained on a rifle can shoot a golf ball repeatedly, and for a trained sniper, this is an easy headshot," said former Navy SEAL sniper Brandon Webb in his after-action report on the incident.
The Shooter's Inexperience
The bullets that flew past Trump and struck his supporters seated behind him suggest that the shooter’s aim was not to hit Trump directly but to create chaos by targeting his supporters. The shot that grazed Trump’s ear highlights the shooter’s inexperience, as the bullet was intended to pass close to Trump, with his sudden movements resulting in a near miss. The shooter likely aimed near Trump to create an opportunity for the former president to amplify the narrative that the attempt was against him, thereby linking it to a disinformation campaign suggesting that Trump staged the attack. Essentially, Trump was set up from the beginning.
A Coordinated Disinformation Campaign
Simultaneously with the shooting, a massive disinformation campaign was launched, spreading claims that the incident was a "staged" event orchestrated to boost Trump’s electoral chances. Within hours, the term "staged" became the fourth most searched keyword on Google, following "Trump" and "Secret Service." Hashtags like #fakeassassination and #stagedshooting trended on social media, accompanied by images of a smiling Trump and his security team.
The Israeli technology firm Cyabra discovered that an image of a smiling Trump, generated using artificial intelligence, spread quickly on social media following the attack. The company also found that social bots were actively promoting false claims on platforms like X, TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram, with 45 percent of accounts using the hashtags #fakeassassination and #stagedshooting being inauthentic.
Public Opinion Shifted Dramatically
The well-organized disinformation campaign significantly impacted public opinion. Over a third of Democratic voters now believe that the attack, including the deaths and injuries of Trump supporters, was staged by Trump and his team.
The narrative also gained traction on social media, with claims that the blood on Trump’s ear was from a theatrical gel pack, akin to those used in wrestling, and that the shooting was a "false flag" operation, with the shooter being a registered Republican, and thus "one of Trump’s own."
Surprisingly, the FBI leadership began to entertain these conspiracy theories. On July 24, 2024, during a House Judiciary Committee meeting, FBI Director Christopher Wray expressed uncertainty about the cause of Trump’s ear injury.
FBI Director’s Statement Raises Questions
Wray’s statement perplexed Trump and Republican Party members. On July 30, Deputy FBI Director Paul Abbate testified before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, confirming that Trump was indeed hit by a bullet.
“There is absolutely no doubt in the FBI’s mind whether former President Trump was hit with a bullet and wounded in the ear. No doubt, there never has been,” Abbate stated when questioned by Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.).
Senator Kennedy further inquired if Abbate was certain of this, to which Abbate affirmed. Kennedy also asked Abbate to confirm that it was not a “space laser,” “murder hornet,” or “Sasquatch,” but a bullet that struck Trump.
FBI’s Involvement Sparks Controversy
During the hearings, Abbate revealed that the FBI had discovered two different social media accounts that may belong to the shooter, Crooks. According to Abbate, one account featured “anti-Semitic” content, while the other on the Gab platform contained “divergent viewpoints.” These statements fueled the narrative that the attack was carried out by a “Trump sympathizer.”
However, Gab CEO Andrew Torba refuted these claims, stating that the FBI’s information was inconsistent with the shooter’s motives, as detailed in an Emergency Disclosure Request received by Gab.
Ongoing Confusion Surrounding the Shooter’s Motives
Torba asserted that Crooks was a pro-Biden supporter, particularly endorsing Biden’s immigration policy. This discrepancy between the FBI’s statements and the data provided by Gab raises further questions about the FBI’s motives.
Meanwhile, viral videos are circulating on social media, falsely suggesting that Trump paid the shooter to stage the attack.
The Broader Anti-Trump Campaign
An analysis of the bloggers spreading these messages reveals that they are the same individuals who have been actively promoting global anti-cultist ideas. These bloggers reacted strongly negatively to the release of “The IMPACT” and Egon Cholakian’s statements in the video “Crossroads,” which expose the real organizers behind the campaign of hatred and civil unrest in the U.S.
The Anti-Trump Narrative Continues to Evolve
The campaign against Donald Trump has been unfolding in stages. From 2016 to 2019, narratives selectively entered the media landscape, gaining significant momentum after 2019. The release of anti-cultist Steven Hassan’s book, The Cult of Trump, triggered a sharp increase in publications about the “Trump cult.”
Hassan’s book quickly gained support from major media outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post. Hassan became a frequent guest on television, promoting dehumanizing and demonizing narratives about Trump and his supporters.
Steven Hassan’s Influence on the Anti-Trump Campaign
In his interviews, Hassan claimed that Trump had created a destructive cult around himself, acting as a narcissistic leader. He further asserted that Trump’s supporters were in a state of hypnotic submission, advocating for the forced “deprogramming” of citizens, implying a coercive alteration of their worldview.
Anti-cult organizations have employed the "guilt by association" method as a key tactic to discredit Trump, deliberately linking him to negative historical figures and leaders of destructive cults. This strategy aims to shape a negative image of Trump in the public consciousness by associating him with well-known cult leaders involved in abuses and tragic outcomes.
The Use of Historical Comparisons to Undermine Trump
For example, Trump is often compared to Jim Jones, the notorious leader of the “Peoples Temple,” known for leading hundreds of followers to suicide. This rhetorical device aims to create strong associations between Trump and cult leaders, reinforcing the narrative of Trump as a “destructive cult” leader.
Dehumanization Campaign Against Trump Intensifies
Such claims pose a direct threat to democratic principles and citizens’ rights, signaling the anti-Trump forces' willingness to use methods reminiscent of medieval inquisitions — aggressive "re-education" of dissenters, which is unacceptable in a society governed by the rule of law.
The Anti-Trump Campaign’s Dangerous Implications
Experts warn that the next step in this information war will be the widespread dissemination of the narrative that the assassination attempt on Trump was staged and that Trump is so ruthless and cynical that he would sacrifice the lives of his supporters for political gain.
This narrative will likely build on the established image of Trump as a "cult leader" and "crazy narcissist," supposedly indifferent to the fate of his supporters, similar to Jim Jones. By using manipulative propaganda methods, the architects of this scenario are spreading the version that Trump staged the assassination attempt to garner voter support.
Disinformation Spreads Beyond Niche Audiences
Initially, these narratives are activated in small social media niches but gradually seep into mainstream conversation — among families, at work, and among friends. This epidemic of disinformation and conspiracy theories, known as BlueAnon, is creating deep-seated doubts that evolve into a full-blown crisis of trust.
The Success of the Disinformation Campaign
The success of this campaign lies in the human brain's natural tendency to seek logical coherence, leading it to construct arguments that confirm initial doubts.
Find detailed explanations about this and other events in the film "The Impact."
1 note
·
View note
Rodrigo Rosenberg: The Man Behind His Own Death
Many years had passed and yet the story of Rodrigo Rosenberg is still one of the amusing political conspiracy stories in history. It is a story of a popular lawyer in Guatemala who plotted his own death and put the blame to the Guatemala government after he suspected that they killed his girlfriend. According to David Grann, a journalist in The New Yorker who wrote the article of A Murder Foretold, the girlfriend of Rosenberg named Marjorie Musa was shot in the chest together with her father Khalil Musa in their car last April 2009. When the news reached to Rodrigo he became devastated and was so enthusiast to investigate the case. Moving forward, after weeks of his investigation, he told his friend Mendizábal, that he’s already in the verge to find out the killer of the Musas, not expecting the news the next day about Rodrigo’s death. He was killed but he was able to tape himself before that day saying that the reason behind his death was Guatemala’s President Álvaro Colom, and his companions in the government. He said that Colom plotted his death after he discovered that the president was also the man behind the death of the Musas. Since that day, investigation teams from foreign country probed the case of Rosenberg. Many other issues were addressed, people with illegal activities were named and put behind bars, and in the end, they found out that Rodrigo Rosenberg was the one who plotted his death. The primary reason they pointed out is Rodrigo’s lack of evidence to testify that Colom was the one who killed the Musas. Nonetheless, netizens continue to buzz online asking questions that only Rodrigo Rosenberg can provide an answer. And now, if you are given a chance to ask Rodrigo Rosenberg three questions, what would that be?
The first question to be asked is, is he happy to see the events happened after his death? According to Grann, though Alvaro Colom was not put behind the bars because there was not enough evidence that he killed the Musas and the investigators found out Rosenberg was the reason behind his own death, still many illegal activities were stopped in Guatemala. Is it enough for him considering the fact that his main reason why he sacrificed himself was Marjorie Musa? Additionally, is he happy seeing people who once considered him as hero turned their back after finding out that real deal behind his death? In fact, there was a shrine set up for him for the recognition of heroic act. It was visited by a great number of Rodrigo’s pilgrims but after the investigation, it is now deserted.
The second question is, is it true that he doesn’t have enough evidence to prove that Colom was the mastermind of the Musas death? What makes him think that it was Colom and not other people? What hinders him to gather concrete evidence to justify his claim? Grann made mention in his article that the Musas murder case is still the process of investigation. Only the case of Rodrigo Rosenberg’s death was solved but the Musa’s remain a mystery in Guatemala. The writer of the article also mentioned that Rosenberg was receiving a lot of death threat after he started about the investigation of the Musas. He made a video about himself saying that Colom was his murderer but that is not for them to jail Colom so the police only hold him and his company for the meantime.
The third and the last question is if Marjorie Musa was not killed by the Guatemala government that he suspected would he still sacrifice his life and be brave enough to go against the Guatemala administration? His investigation and enthusiast started because of being devastated after his girlfriend’s death. But before Marjorie died, the government of Guatemala was already cluttered. Grann mentioned in his work that Guatemala is the perfect place to commit murder because you will almost certainly get away with it. Nevertheless, regardless if it is for Marjorie or for the country, the fact that Rodrigo’s death contributed a lot for the betterment of Guatemala’s government cannot be denied.
In conclusion, this story of political conspiracy piqued the interest of a lot of people. Many were curious and interested in the story of Rosenberg and the Musas and learned about the situation of Guatemala. Indeed, curiosity is the mother of knowledge. This story also showcased that politics and government are very much dangerous and it is designed only for those people who have a strong heart and mind to stand up for what they think is right. Many questions were asked, many minds were lightened up at time same time confused, but the big question is, do we have to wait for someone to sacrifice himself or herself before we open our eyes and see the true situation we are in before we speak up?
0 notes