#RequestForProposal

[proposal-templates]

Business Proposal Template for Research Fieldwork Services https://rfply.com/business-proposal-template-for-research-fieldwork-services/?utm_source=tumblr&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=proposaltemplates

[nationaltender]

Efficiency and Transparency Unleashed: Harnessing the Power of RFPs in Government Tenders and e-Procurement

Introduction:

In today’s digital era, eTendering has revolutionized the government procurement process, making it more efficient, transparent, and accessible. Request for Proposals (RFPs) plays a vital role in this transformation, enabling government organizations to solicit competitive bids from potential suppliers through e-procurement platforms. In this blog post, we will delve into the significance of RFPs in government tenders and e-procurement, highlighting their benefits, key components, and best practices to ensure successful outcomes.

Understanding RFPs in Government Tenders and e-Procurement:

Before exploring the intricacies of RFPs in government tenders and e-procurement, it is essential to grasp their fundamental concept. A Request for Proposal is a formal document that outlines the requirements, specifications, and desired outcomes of a project or procurement. It serves as a powerful tool for government organizations to communicate their needs to potential vendors and elicit comprehensive and competitive bids through e-procurement platforms.

Streamlining the Government Procurement Process:

Implementing eTendering with RFPs as a central component offers numerous advantages in government tenders and e-procurement, including:

a. Enhanced Efficiency: By leveraging e-procurement platforms, government organizations can streamline the tendering process, minimizing manual paperwork and administrative tasks. RFPs can be published online, allowing suppliers from anywhere to access and respond to them promptly, saving time and resources.

b. Increased Competition: eTendering through e-procurement platforms opens doors for a broader pool of suppliers to participate in government tenders. This increased competition can drive better pricing, improved quality, and innovative solutions, ultimately benefiting the government and taxpayers.

c. Improved Transparency: Transparency is paramount in government tenders to ensure fairness, integrity, and accountability. With eTendering, RFPs and their subsequent evaluations are conducted electronically, creating an auditable trail and ensuring transparency at every stage of the procurement process.

d. Standardized Tender Documents: RFPs provide a structured framework for government organizations to define and standardize tender documents. This consistency enables vendors to understand and respond to the requirements more effectively, leading to better-aligned proposals.

Key Components of an RFP in Government Tenders:

To effectively solicit bids and facilitate informed decision-making in government tenders and e-procurement, an RFP typically includes the following sections:

a. Introduction: Provides an overview of the tender, the government organization, and the objectives of the project.

b. Scope of Work: Clearly defines the requirements, deliverables, timelines, and any specific constraints associated with the government tender.

c. Evaluation Criteria: Specify the factors that will be used to assess the proposals, including technical capabilities, pricing, past performance, compliance requirements, and any specific criteria relevant to the government organization.

d. Technical Specifications: Outlines the technical requirements, standards, and performance expectations expected from potential suppliers.

e. Proposal Format: Outlines the structure and format expected for the submitted proposals, including necessary documents and supporting information.

f. Contractual and Legal Requirements: Includes terms and conditions, payment terms, intellectual property rights, and any other legal obligations specific to the government tender.

Best Practices for RFPs in Government Tenders and e-Procurement:

To ensure the success of an RFP in government tenders and e-procurement, government organizations should consider the following best practices:

a. Clearly Define Requirements: A well-defined scope of work, technical specifications, and tender document leave no room for ambiguity, enabling suppliers to provide accurate and competitive proposals.

b. Encourage Questions: Providing a platform for potential suppliers to seek clarifications promotes a better understanding of the government tender, ensuring accurate and comprehensive bids.

c. Establish Clear Evaluation Criteria: Define evaluation criteria in advance, outlining their relative importance to guide suppliers in tailoring their proposals accordingly.

d. Engage Stakeholders: Involving relevant stakeholders during the RFP development process ensures that all perspectives are considered, increasing the chances of project success and stakeholder satisfaction.

e. Maintain Transparency: Keep the entire process transparent and maintain clear communication with all bidders to foster trust and integrity throughout the government tender process.

Conclusion:

The integration of RFPs into eTendering has transformed government tenders and e-procurement, enabling government organizations to streamline processes, increase competition, and enhance transparency. By harnessing the power of e-procurement platforms and following best practices, governments can unlock efficiency and transparency, find the most suitable suppliers, and ultimately deliver better outcomes for their constituents. RFPs in government tenders and e-procurement serve as catalysts for driving innovation, achieving cost savings, and fostering trust in the procurement process

Source: https://medium.com/@seo.nationaltenders/efficiency-and-transparency-unleashed-harnessing-the-power-of-rfps-in-government-tenders-and-536d2a28a62a

[zbizlink]

A request for proposal often goes by a simpler acronym called an RFP. If an organization has a problem or an upcoming project, but do not have the required resources, they seek the support of an external vendor. In order to find the vendor(s), they “float” an RFP. Vendors who can perform the required skills or provide the right products respond to the RFP with a business proposal.

[mitchbeck]

CANTLON’S CORNER: XL CENTER FUTURE FRONT AND CENTER

BY: Gerry Cantlon, Howlings HARTFORD, CT - The puck is now officially in the Connecticut legislature's corner. Last week, during his State-of-the-State address, Governor Ned Lamont officially requested that the State Legislature grant him a bonding package of $55 million over two years ($27.5M/per) for the XL Center as part of the unveiling of his $22.5 billion dollar state budget. The Finance Committee received a request to place the bonding issue on the agenda for review. The request came from four political heavyweights, House Majority leader Matt Ritter (D-Hartford), Speaker of the House Joe Aresimowicz (D-Berlin), Senate Majority leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk, Darien) and President Pro Tempore Senator Martin Looney (D-New Haven). CRDA Executive Director, Mike Freimuth, saw this move by the Governor as the culmination of an eight-month protracted process that's had many starts, stops, pauses, not to mention a fair share of acrimony, to get to this point. “We have three pretty powerful people behind it; the Governor, Minority Speaker Ritter, and Rep. John Fonfara (D-Hartford, Wethersfield who chairs the Finance committee) and several other prominent legislators. But that being said, I am cautiously optimistic this will get through. There is a long process to still go through. It’s hard to predict." The bonding issue must first pass the Finance committee, and it has, and then must be approved by the General Assembly before it officially goes to the Bond Commission. The General Assembly has been very reluctant as a whole, especially the delegations from the big cities, namely New Haven, Waterbury, New London, Bridgeport, and Stamford, to allocate any public money for the XL Center considering its age and poor financial performance over the years. “I think it’s a tough sell; always has been. We have the votes to pass for the authorization, I think, and that could get done in 60 days, but the bonding is going to take a bit more time. There are a lot more questions that will be asked of us in this process as it plays out. We have to rationalize the equation to the dollars being put in and the dollars generated both with respect to taxes and to revenue generated inside the building.” The Governor controls the agenda and priorities of the Bond Commission. Last year, the $60 million dollar proposal to fix the crumbling XL Center was never even considered. In the last seven years, proposals to renovate and update the XL Center started with $250 million and was then revised to $100 million. Both proposals were quashed and never received approval during the Malloy Administration. Ritter, in an interview with WNPR, seemed confident that in the next sixty days this long-stalled project will come to life. “I think it’s an issue of getting this done quickly, that’s the biggest issue because if it languishes for four-or-five more years, you won’t a building that can be used anymore. We have to get this done very, very quickly, and I think we will.” The fact remains, however, that the project is already five years behind schedule. The dollar number still falls far short of the overall goal of the new Lower Bowl Strategy requiring the desperately needed $100 million to overhaul the aging building as the marketplace surpasses Hartford more every day both regionally and nationally. New buildings are being built and older ones are receiving necessary retro-fits to remain viable as entertainment assets in the marketplace. “We have to get this thing started because once we do, we have to then look to renegotiate contracts with UCONN and MSG because the revenue stream will change,” commented Freimuth. The whole equation hinges on a whole set of factors, not just one or two. Hence, the complexity involved requires adroit political and financial maneuvering. Currently, the XL Center loses roughly $1.5 to $2 million per year with the state taking the brunt of the shortfall. Next week, the CRDA is set to unveil the fifth commissioned study by CSL International about the economic viability of the XL Center in the marketplace. This study was required by the Lamont Administration to acquire its support for the bonding and requires a public-private financing component to fulfill the other half of the economic equation and get the ball moving on a project long past overdue. The question remains to be fully known if the study has put the CRDA in a position to start making pitches in boardrooms about the building. Freimuth said, “It's still too early (to know) until we release the study next Thursday presenting it fully before the (CRDA) board. Part of doing all of this is what will premium seating be, and other price points. I think we'll have better concessions and better revenue and that will factor in those future negotiations with UCONN and MSG. All of this will be simultaneous with Big East basketball coming back.” This all comes amid a mixed bag of new financial numbers at the XL Center with team's operators in the building in the red, while concessions and the all-important per cap from food and beverage sales are in the black. The numbers are shocking in some cases. In December, the end of the fiscal year, the Hartford Wolf Pack is averaging a draw of only 2,800 fans per event. UCONN hockey fares even worse with just 2,100 fans per game. “Those were December numbers. The January numbers were a much better month, and are trending upwards for both teams. They're above those numbers right now. We hope with both UCONN hockey and the Wolf Pack continuing to play well those numbers will go up. Playoffs traditionally don’t draw well because you don’t know what the calendar is, but you hope a good run helps out." The AHL attendance figures list the Wolf Pack at 25th out of the league's 31 teams with an average attendance of 3,828 per game. In their last year in the AAC conference before returning to the Big East, UConn basketball is not drawing very well either. The men’s side though had two big games with Wichita State and Baylor. Hockey operations are running even with the budget, but on the whole, as of the third quarter, the XL Center was set to begin was operating with a $275K budget shortfall or, "unfavorable to the budget," in accounting parlance. These numbers will accompany any proposal to a potential private partnership and could sink any possibility before any serious talks even begin. "It’s a bit too early for that. We'll be releasing the study and then we can examine what the best direction to move forward on is to rebuild the arena. There is going to be public dollars however way you slice it. How we get there? That is what we're working on (with the bonding request) and its why we had the study done.” The atrium portion of the building is still owned by Northland Corporation and it's acquisition remains at a stalemate even after nearly three years of negotiation. There is a wide chasm in pricing that has not been bridged with the Northland, the actual property's titleholder and the CRDA. In the last go-round, Northland was seeking as much $10M to the proposed $4.5M proffered by the CRDA. That offer was rejected. Eminent domain still hangs in the air and it's unknown if the CRDA will choose that option and pull the trigger on it this year. There could restraints on the CRDA from using that option at the request of the Governor, Speaker of the House Aresimowicz, and/or Minority Leader, Len Fasano (R-North Haven). ”Nobody wants to do it, but we have been begged off on it. It has been a topic of conversation there have been multiple discussions. Everybody is aware, the atrium is critical to this whole process in the rebuild of the building. We're gonna have to come to some kind of solution to that,“ said Freimuth, who was clearly exasperated by the topic. If the bond package passes as currently written, the question remains if the atrium issue will have to be resolved very shortly thereafter. “Absolutely, at that point, to go forward, the issue will have to be addressed very quickly.” In that same WNPR interview Chris Davis (R-East Windsor, Ellington) offered an alternative plan that others have offered and that's to build a smaller arena near Dunkin’ Donuts Ballpark and create a sports and entertainment zone at the beginning of the North End of Hartford. The current XL Center location, setup, and bonding proposal is not something Davis, a bond committee member, has said he would not support. “We keep hearing that there are talks of potentially doing private partnerships, but I fear that we’d be throwing this money at it, basically putting the cart before the horse,” Davis said. Is the possibility of the smaller arena feasible, or in any form of preliminary discussions? Possibly a Plan B, or is it more of a pie-in-the-sky theory? “Nothing at all,” said Freimuth succinctly. Part of the backdrop in the state sports landscape is that UCONN athletics is running a $42M deficit. Add the public announcement of the gargantuan financial sinkhole Rentschler Field is in it's bleeding enormous financial red ink at the clip of $1M by the conclusion of this fiscal year, the largest loss since the stadium opened in 2003. The realization of that stand-alone issue and its long term viability, and with UCONN football now having to enter as an Independent Division I schedule with an average attendance of just 9,675 per game (in a 40,000 seat stadium) could have an adverse effect on the XL Center future discussions. Toss in the disaster of the rebuild of Dillon Stadium that also diverted time and resources last summer and that also oozes red ink from underneath the brand new field and stadium. The CRDA is pushing a very big boulder uphill One positive note is the installation of the long-overdue chiller system that seems to be on target for this summer after a year-long delay. The RFP (Request For Proposal) packages have gone out and they have received initial responses. A bid is expected to be selected next month and a contract signed allowing work to begin sometime in mid-to-late June. “Right now there are (RFP’s) out on the street. They’re due to be turned back in, in about two weeks or so. Bob Saint (CRDA, Construction Manager) has been hard at work on it. We’re relocating the chillers based on a new building concept. They’re not going into the space where the current chillers are. We hope to get it done this summer.” Should the Wolf Pack have a long Calder Cup playoff run into May, and if several other scheduled events happen at the XL Center, the work won’t likely start until those events are done so as to not impact either the event or the installation project. “We’re gonna wait until the hockey season ends and the way the Wolf Pack are playing it could be a longer season, and we have the Cirque de Soleil Ice Show in June and several still to be announced concerts. They’re too many things to move around. Better to wait until everything is done,” said Freimuth. Will the new chiller system be hooked up to the existing system and disconnecting the current outdated system? “We’re gonna hook it up as soon as we can. We’re gonna transition to it we’re not going cold turkey on the old system. We'll do it when the new system is ready, there is going to be a transition period to work things out before a complete change. When we get the chiller system put into shape and ready to go will do it. To be honest, they’re not too many more rubber bands left that we can put on the chiller system that we have now. We’re running pretty thin on the line as it now, we gotta get this thing done.” The last grains of sand are running out of the hour-glass. It begs the question, can this last effort to get the new XL Center project going before the green light goes on and if it can succeed? Read the full article

[fabiopalvelli]

New video is live peeps ❤️ #youtube #vlog #rfp #requestforproposal #howto (at Tel Aviv, Israel) https://www.instagram.com/p/B4_2GRApxWP/?igshid=6nalr13objji

[dailyblog4u-blog]

Best RFP Bid sites and RFP Search Engine | Daily news about RFP

Best RFP Bid sites and RFP Search Engine Sites | Daily news about RFP

Organizations may issue an RFP, or a request for the proposal while picking a vendor or specialist co-op to work with.  At the point when your organization has another (regularly huge) undertaking or one that is progressively mind-boggling and requires a touch of outsourcing. There are many RFP bid sites which provide any information about tenders and news about bidding. The RFP search engine doc turns into a route for you to rapidly reveal the qualities and shortcomings of potential vendors in connection to your undertaking without investing a lot of your energy chasing for them yourself.  RFPs can likewise give you a sneak look into changed methodologies you might not have considered since every seller will incorporate their very own novel activity plan alongside their bid. DailyBlog4u is best RFP aggregator which provides any news about bidding so you can say DailyBlog4u is best RFP search engine. Also, you'll have this data before you ever need to focus on the vendor.  Remember, this ought not to be mistaken for an RFQ.

RFP vs. RFQ

An RFQ, or request for quotation, is somewhat not quite the same as an RFP since it's simply the statement itself. Here, organizations request different value cites from different vendors to analyze administrations dependent on cost alone. While an RFP incorporates a value quote (alongside a few different points of interest), an RFQ does not detail something besides cost. You can get quotation of all rfp bidding sites. Instead of an RFP, an RFQ is a solicitation for statement or quotation. Here are the means by which to understand the difference:   While you're in fact accepting a statement in an RFP, you're additionally getting data like the activity plan, course of events of fruition, deliverable calendar, and the rundown of services gave too. Yet, with an RFQ, you're just receiving the statement itself for the administration or items you're keen on purchasing. First all you need to go to the best rfp search engine which provides all the information.   Before potential bidders can present their proposition, an RFP must be drafted by the organization mentioning the work. (P.S. We'll tell you the best way to do this later in this guide) This gives potential contractual workers a superior thought of what your organization is searching for.  DailyBlog4u provide RFP bid sites When your RFP is conveyed, contractual workers or sellers can survey it and present their best offers to vie for the activity.   In this proposition, vendors by and large incorporate the accompanying things:   An activity plan of how they will explain the issue A timetable of what you can anticipate Any important foundation data How much they anticipate that the whole venture should cost   In specific cases, bidders may return and state explicit parts of the RFP should be balanced dependent on their involvement in the business. RFP bid sites Now, you can either audit their criticism and make another RFP modify for the changes, or you can leave the first as is and remember it while considering the other submitted offers. When you get every one of the proposition, it will be practically easy to look at everyone and figure out which merchant is the best fit for your organization. Out of the heap of bidders, you'll need to limit this down to a bunch of your best three, five, or 10 top picks to consider, contingent upon what number of you get or are keen on. From here, you'll need to invest energy confirming potential sellers further to figure out who's extremely the perfect fit for the activity.  Rfp bid sites provide a complete structure of request for proposal and RFQ.   A few organizations may demand one all the more best and last idea from their top merchants after they've begun this arrangement procedure to guarantee they're not just getting the ideal individual or organization for the activity, yet at the correct cost, as well. While this may seem like an additional progression, it's one that may spare you cash, time, and cerebral pains not far off. However, this additionally drives us to an unavoidable issue: Is the majority of this extremely essential? RFP aggregator tells about all tenders and location wise data. Wouldn't you be able to simply invest energy inspecting a few sellers all alone? As you'll see straight away, that course is unquestionably not to your greatest advantage. Avoid common mistakes Abstain from utilizing labels to distinguish obsolete substance. According to RFP Aggregator Learning Base starting at now incorporates date and timestamps to all segments, so this sort of tag would simply incorporate wreckage. If, as your substance library develops, you find the marking structure your affiliation uses never again serves your prerequisites, don't solidify. Customers can eradicate and incorporate names at whatever point. Here is the platform for all RFPs which can visit and collect information about rfp bid sites. Read the full article

[martadiversity]

Please locate MARTA’s Current Opportunities page on itsmarta.com at: 

https://martabid.marta.net/CurrentOpportunities.aspx

[freshproposal]

Difference Between RFI, RFQ and RFP 

[appventurezmobitech]

What differentiates them with RFP, RFQ, RFI

[proposal-templates]

Request for Proposal Template for Website Management, Maintenance, and Support Services https://rfply.com/request-for-proposal-template-for-website-management-maintenance-and-support-services/?utm_source=tumblr&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=proposaltemplates

[flupertech]

If you are in the #mobileapp world, then you must have heard about the #RequestForProposal. Yes, an only way to increase your business growth by connecting to potential partners. But, responding to an #RFP takes a lot of time. Before you make your decision, consider these 4 major points. : http://www.fluper.com/blog/app-development-companies-in-canada-highlights-motive-of-mobile-app-rpf-with-4-key-points/ #mobileappdevelopment #mobileapplicationdevelopers #fluper2.0 https://www.instagram.com/p/BpgtjAYBYvJ/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1ffdadeed6nxn

[mapstudiodesign-blog]

Website RFP (Request for Proposal) Template

By Zach Katkin Posted March 29, 2018 from Atilus Awhile back I wrote a detailed post on Website RFPs. I lambasted and vilified RFPs. In hindsight, it was a little… ahem… emotional. I was jaded, we had just lost a bid on a project and I was disappointed to say the least. However, yesterday I logged into our website to see a comment from a visitor – Brian. Brian took the time to write a massive comment on the post and had some helpful suggestions as to solve the problem of Website RFPs in general noting: …instead of bashing RFP’s altogether, it would behoove you to be part of the solution (by giving more clear examples, maybe in the form of a downloadable sample of YOUR preferred RFP format), instead of complaining about the problem (and crying about why you didn’t get the job). On reflection over the last day, I have to agree with everything he wrote entirely. It’s funny, I’ve been reading “How to Win Friends and Influence People” and it’s amazing how, with a slight shift in perspective so much is possible. With that in mind, I’d like to apologize for the previous post, completely bashing Website RFPs, and would like to extend a big thank you to Brian for taking the time to write out such a thoughtful comment, and for being the inspiration for this follow up. His comment helped me to see the RFP process from his perspective (and that of other clients who have contacted us via RFPs) and allowed me to see how vital they are and how at the end of the day, everyone using an RFP is simply trying to select the best vendor, create a fair environment for selecting a vendor and make the process more efficient. WEBSITE RFP TEMPLATES After doing some quick searches on what’s available for Website RFP Templates, I found a couple that I thought might be helpful, but missed the mark a bit, and didn’t address many of the concerns and suggestions I brought up in my previous post. So, I’ve decided to put together a template that helps solve many of the issues that arise during the request for proposal process. Notably the issues we see during this process include:

Company Description This is left out of nearly every RFP and is vital to a successful project. Project Description (Goals) Ultimately the best firms are looking to help you achieve results not just implement solutions. Budget An upfront, honest discussion on budget helps every project. Want vs. Needs What’s absolutely mandatory and what are those things that you’d like to have? Flexibility Strict RFPs don’t allow for a particular company’s strengths, weaknesses, etc. to shine through. Communication Setting a framework for initial communication is vital to a successful project. HOW THE WEBSITE RFP TEMPLATE IS ORGANIZED The samples I’ve attached at the bottom of this post are simple. One link is for the original word document (where you can replace the notes/suggestions with your own information), and another is a link to a PDF sample I quickly filled out as an example (and to further this post – more in a moment).

Overall it features 14 major sections: Company Mission Company Description Address Phone Project Description/Intent Project Description (Design) Project Description (Marketing) Project Description (Programming) Persons Involved Availability During Proposal Process Preferred Method of Contact Timelines/Milestones Budget Other Helpful Information Each section outlines a bit of our thoughts on this. We are inherently biased in this, and going through this process has been interesting – namely filling out the RFP similar to another we’ve received – and gaining a better understanding of the organizations/persons mind-set as they fill this out. Each section is obviously flexible and you can replace with anything you find appropriate or important for you. WHERE THE WEBSITE RFP TEMPLATES FAIL In filling out the sample template above, I did realize how challenging this is for anyone going through this process. And I didn’t even dive into any of the technology. It seems like around 80% of RFPs include technical details – based on past experience, advice, etc. – all of which may or may not be relevant. But, in addition to that, there are so many questions that arise from our perspective that need to be addressed to accurate quote/proposal and successfully execute a project. With this in mind I kept things as flexible as possible – with a concentration on communication. As we state to every new client, communication is the most vital part of this new relationship – and getting it right up front – and continuing it throughout the the lifetime of the project and relationship – is vital to a happy experience on everyone’s end. One final note – added in the “other helpful information” section in both the sample PDF and the word document are some of the selection criteria. It’s helpful as a dev firm to understand what’s important to you. Do you care about the fanciest design, tech, getting the job done right the first time, achieving your goals/revenue? The more you can detail out what the successful firm you choose will look like – the more it helps set expectations and allows the future developers to understand you and your businesses unique needs. Read the full article

[jaymontgomeryart]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Jay Montgomery (@jaymontgomeryart)

Ames Scullin O'Haire ad agency (ASO) in Atlanta asked me to do a live drawing of life-sized, fit man and woman. ASO was making a video proposal wanting to be the main agency for a fitness center. This is an edited version only showing my part of the video. It was a bit different being filmed drawing, but with the right preparation, everyone was happy. Special thanks to Ryan Mikesell, Sandra Love and the whole Ames Scullin O'Haire team for letting me use clips from their wonderful video. If you would like a live illustrator for your video or next brainstorming session check out my profile line for more info @jaymontgomeryart . . . . . . . . . #illustrator #liveillustration #liveillustrator #figuredrawing #pastel #drawing #adillustration #adillustrator #adagency #speedpainting #standees #rfp #atlanta #video #lifedrawing #requestforproposal #simplycooldesign @simply.cool.design #artistsoninstagram #artistsofinstagram #sketch #artistsofig #instaart @asoadvertising #adlife @ryan_mikesell @sllove85 @jaymontgomeryart

[martadiversity]

Please locate MARTA's Current Opportunities page on itsmarta.com at: https://lnkd.in/evEFWyB