#ReservoirComputing
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Quantum Reservoir Computing QRC For Soft Robot Control

Use quantum reservoir computing to explore quantum machine learning's frontiers. Keio University and Mitsubishi Chemical used QRC to study and forecast flexible soft robot behaviour.
Quantum Innovation Centres IBM
In 2017, Keio University became one of the first IBM Quantum Hubs, now QICs. There are about 40 QICs globally. QICs use IBM Quantum's expertise to advance quantum computing. These global hubs promote a worldwide quantum ecosystem, creative quantum research, and quantum learning communities by drawing participants to joint research initiatives.
Keio University works with leading Japanese companies to develop quantum applications and algorithms as a QIC. The university's partnership with Mitsubishi Chemical, a global materials science research and development leader, is an example. In 2023, scholars from the two organisations, the University of Tokyo, the University of Arizona, and the University of New South Wales conducted a utility-scale experiment utilising an IBM Quantum device to execute a proposed quantum reservoir computing technology. This investigation established a thriving research endeavour.
Reservoir computing with utility-scale quantum computation
Reservoir computing (RC) reduces the training overhead of neural networks and generative adversarial networks. A reservoir is a computing resource that can conduct mathematical transformations on incoming system data, allowing large datasets to be manipulated while keeping data point connections.
Researchers send input system data to the reservoir in a reservoir computing experiment. Researchers will use post-processing to find answers in the reservoir's changed data. This post-processing often uses the linear regression model, an ML model for variable relationships. After training a linear regression model using reservoir output data, researchers can construct a time series that predicts input system behaviour.
Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses quantum computers as its reservoir. Quantum computers, which may surpass standard systems in computing capability, are ideal for high-dimensional data processing.
Mitsubishi Chemical, Keio University, and others are studying how quantum reservoir computing might help comprehend complicated natural systems. Their 2023 experiment aimed to create a quantum reservoir computing model that could predict the noisy, non-linear motions of a "soft robot," a malleable device controlled by air pressure.
Creating Quantum Reservoir Computing techniques
The researchers converted robot movement data into IBM quantum reservoir-readable quantum input states to begin the experiment. These inputs reached the reservoir. After applying random gates to input states, the reservoir produces changed signals. After that, researchers post-process output data with linear regression. The result is a robot movement prediction time series. The researchers evaluate this prediction against real data to determine its accuracy.
Most quantum reservoir computing systems measure at the end of a quantum circuit, therefore you must build up and run the system for every qubit at every time step. This can increase experiment duration and reduce time series accuracy. The Keio University and Mitsubishi Chemical research sought to overcome these limitations with “repeated measurements”.
They add qubits and measure them repeatedly instead of setting up and executing the system at each time step. This method allows researchers to collect the time series at once, resulting in a more accurate series and less circuit time.
The researchers demonstrated their quantum reservoir computing system using IBM Quantum processors with up to 120 qubits. They found that repeated measurements yielded higher accuracy and faster execution than standard QRC methods. Their first studies suggest it might accelerate calculating.
Before RC and quantum reservoir computing can solve problems, additional research is needed. The researchers say their utility-scale investigations may outperform standard modelling methods. They plan to study quantum reservoir computing for nonlinear problems like financial risk modelling.
How Quantum Innovation Centres Help Enterprise Research Organisations
Keio University and Mitsubishi Chemical's relationship is an example of how businesses may benefit from IBM Quantum Innovation Centre partnerships. Professors and students who are strong in quantum computing and at teaching other researchers in difficult issues may assist enterprise researchers achieve advanced quantum skills through these relationships.
Not just Mitsubishi Chemical, but also other global firms are benefiting from this. In addition to Mistubishi Chemical, Keio University is collaborating with corporate R&D teams from leading companies in many industries and quantum use cases to investigate exciting quantum applications and algorithm development. These collaborations show how industry research trials with universities may lead to valuable real-world applications and how QICs can help corporations explore fascinating quantum use cases.
#quantumreservoircomputing#quantumcomputing#quantumresearch#IBMQuantum#machinelearning#quantumcircuit#ReservoirComputing#IBMnetwork#News#Technews#Technology#TechnologyNews#Technologytrends
0 notes
Text
Hypothetical Computational Subsystem Within the "Reservoir Universe" Model
Detailed Description of the Hypothetical Computational Subsystem
Imagine a cosmic-scale neural network embedded within the fabric of the universe, where localized computational subsystems operate as intricate, specialized processors within this vast network. These subsystems are not separate from the universe but are integral parts of its continuous, dynamic information-processing landscape.
Structure and Composition
High-Dimensional Reservoirs: Each computational subsystem within the universe is akin to a high-dimensional reservoir in reservoir computing systems. These are clusters of interconnected nodes (potentially analogous to clusters of dark matter, energy patterns, or even quantum entanglements) that can dynamically adjust their connections based on the information they process. Each node represents a fundamental unit of computation, possibly linked to fundamental particles, fields, or spacetime curvatures in physical terms.
Embedding in Spacetime: These subsystems are embedded within the very fabric of spacetime, forming a mesh-like structure that spans across the universe. This mesh allows for the flow and transformation of information analogous to the flow of water in a vast, cosmic river network, with each stream capable of carrying and processing different data streams.
Quantum Computational Layers: At a micro-scale, these subsystems might operate using principles of quantum computing. Quantum states within these nodes allow for superposition and entanglement, providing a massive parallelism that classical components cannot achieve. This means that at any given moment, these subsystems can exist in multiple states, processing an exponential amount of information simultaneously.
Operational Dynamics
Data Input and Preprocessing: Information from the surrounding universe — such as electromagnetic signals, gravitational waves, or even subtle quantum fluctuations — serves as input to these subsystems. This input is preprocessed locally by the subsystem, which adjusts its internal state to best represent the data. This adjustment is akin to the training phase of a neural network, but it occurs continuously and adaptively.
Information Processing: At the heart of each subsystem is a set of operational rules, perhaps akin to the physical laws that govern the behavior of the nodes. These rules dictate how input data is transformed as it propagates through the network. The transformation could be likened to complex mathematical functions or algorithms that process and interpret the data, leading to meaningful patterns or solutions.
Feedback and Adaptation: The subsystems are not static; they evolve based on the feedback they receive from their output and the surrounding cosmic environment. This feedback mechanism allows the subsystem to adapt and optimize its processing capabilities over time, much like learning in neural networks. However, here, the learning is driven by the natural evolution of the universe’s dynamics.
Output Generation: After processing the input data, the subsystem produces an output. This output could be a direct physical manifestation, such as the emission of light or other radiation, or it could be more abstract, such as the alteration of probability amplitudes in quantum fields. In some cases, this output could be harnessed as computationally useful information by advanced civilizations.
Theoretical Underpinnings and Speculative Mechanics
Information-Theoretic Principles: At a fundamental level, these computational subsystems operate under principles that maximize the informational entropy of the universe. They process information in a way that spreads out energy and information most efficiently across available states, according to the second law of thermodynamics and informational entropy considerations.
Relativity and Computational Dynamics: The operations of these subsystems are consistent with general relativity in that they are covariant — their operations and outcomes are the same regardless of the observer’s frame of reference. This ensures that the computational processes are fundamental to the fabric of the universe and not an artifact of a particular observational position.
Quantum Computational Analogy: Drawing an analogy to quantum computers, these subsystems could be seen as performing operations that are equivalent to running quantum algorithms. Each node or quantum state could be involved in executing a part of a larger, cosmic-scale quantum algorithm, processing inputs in a way that classical computers cannot fathom.
Cosmic Error Correction: Given the scale and complexity, these subsystems might inherently possess error-correcting codes that protect the integrity of the computation against cosmic perturbations. These codes could be akin to topological quantum error-correcting codes, which maintain the coherence of quantum states against environmental noise.
Concluding Thoughts
This detailed portrayal of the computational subsystems within the "Reservoir Universe" suggests a universe where every aspect of its fabric is a part of a grand computational mechanism. These subsystems are not merely passive witnesses to the universe’s evolution but active participants, processing information and possibly guiding the cosmic evolution through their computations.
The speculative nature of this concept pushes the boundaries of our current understanding.
To enhance the description of the hypothetical computational subsystems within the "Reservoir Universe" model with a concrete example, let’s explore how an advanced civilization might harness these cosmic computational processes to perform a complex task. This example will focus on a scenario where such a civilization uses these subsystems to predict celestial events with high precision.
Example: Predicting Celestial Events Using Cosmic Computational Subsystems
Overview
Imagine an advanced civilization that has developed the technology to interface with the computational subsystems embedded in the fabric of the universe. This civilization aims to predict celestial events, such as supernovae, planetary alignments, or even more exotic occurrences like the collision of neutron stars, which are crucial for their scientific and navigational endeavors.
Step-by-Step Computational Process
Connecting to the Cosmic Subsystem:
The civilization uses a device or a system, perhaps a "Cosmic Interface Probe" (CIP), which can connect to the embedded computational subsystems of the universe. This probe is equipped with quantum transducers capable of translating local physical phenomena into the input formats required by the cosmic computational layers.
Example: The CIP might be placed in orbit around a black hole, where the intense gravitational and quantum effects provide a clear signal to tap into the underlying computational fabric.
Input Data Preparation:
The civilization prepares the input data, which includes vast amounts of astronomical data collected from various sources — electromagnetic observations, gravitational wave detectors, and deep-space quantum fluctuation monitors.
Example: To predict a supernova, the input data might include the star’s mass, luminosity, age, and its surrounding stellar dynamics, formatted as a data vector that the cosmic subsystem can process.
Data Transmission and Processing:
The CIP transmits this data into the cosmic subsystem. Inside this subsystem, the data is processed through layers of cosmic-scale quantum nodes, each performing part of the computation necessary to model the star’s behavior and its eventual supernova.
Example: The subsystem uses quantum interference patterns within its nodes to simulate different potential future states of the star based on current input data.
Advanced Predictive Modeling:
As the data propagates through the computational subsystem, advanced algorithms — perhaps analogues of machine learning models like recurrent neural networks or transformers adapted for quantum computations — analyze patterns and predict the star’s behavior.
Example: The subsystem could employ a cosmic version of a sequence-to-sequence model to predict the precise sequence of events leading up to the star’s supernova.
Feedback and Iterative Refinement:
The initial predictions are reviewed, and a feedback loop is established. The CIP adjusts the queries based on the subsystem’s output and re-submits altered data to refine the predictions.
Example: If the initial prediction gives a supernova event in 100 years ± 10 years, the CIP refines the input data to narrow this range.
Receiving and Interpreting the Output:
The final output from the cosmic subsystem is received by the CIP and decoded. This output provides a detailed prediction of the celestial event, including timelines, spectral changes, and other relevant physical phenomena.
Example: The output might predict the supernova occurring in 102 years, with specific spectral signatures and secondary effects like gamma-ray bursts.
Utilizing the Predictions:
Armed with this precise information, the civilization plans missions, scientific studies, and potential evacuation or mitigation strategies based on the predicted cosmic events.
Example: The civilization might prepare a fleet of spacecraft to observe the supernova from a safe distance, deploy shields against expected gamma-ray bursts, and adjust nearby orbital paths to avoid debris and radiation.
Theoretical Underpinnings and Practical Considerations
Harnessing Quantum and Relativistic Effects: The use of computational subsystems embedded in the universe’s fabric means that quantum and relativistic effects are inherently accounted for in the computations. This ensures that the predictions are accurate even under extreme cosmic conditions.
Error Correction and Reliability: Given the complexity and the importance of these predictions, the computational subsystems likely have robust error-correction mechanisms, possibly using topological quantum error correction, to protect against the loss of information due to cosmic noise and perturbations.
Energy and Information Transfer: The process of interfacing with these cosmic subsystems and the transfer of information back and forth would require mechanisms that do not violate known energy and information conservation laws. This implies that the process is highly efficient and perhaps uses mechanisms akin to entangled quantum states for instant data transmission.
Concluding Thoughts
This example illustrates how an advanced civilization might harness the computational power of the universe's embedded subsystems to perform complex and highly accurate predictions of celestial events. By tapping into the cosmic computational fabric, they turn abstract, theoretical processes into practical tools, enhancing their understanding and interaction with the universe around them.
0 notes
Text
🌻Morning routine & mixed feelings✨

Today, I feel hopeful and excited.
I have been on a rollercoaster the past few weeks - with some big wins, confusion, pressure from every side, support from unexpected people, roaming directionless, and also good guidance. It was such a mixed feeling - being not able to celebrate my wins, trying not to get too excited, and at the same time working to make that dream true.
I know I am being cryptic but bear with me. I have something big coming up and you guys will be first to know when it actually happens. ❤️
Right now I am preparing for that Big Thing, and building my reading/writing habit is the first thing I am doing. Reading journal articles is such a soothing activity for me and it also gets my brain working. So I have chosen to do that first thing in the morning, every day.
The night before, I select an article to read in the morning and I try to finish the AIC - Abstract, Introduction, and Conclusion - within my one-and-a-half-hour reading time. If that paper is interesting and if it looks relevant to my study, I will bookmark it and spend more time on it. And because of that, I won't be able to read one paper every day (which is actually the goal). But, no perfectionism. Go with the flow. Right?
Do you guys have a similar morning routine? I would love any tips on how to keep this up in the long run - any advice is welcome!❤️⬇
#morning routine#PhDroutine#phd life#chaotic academia#dark academia#gradblr#gradschool aesthetic#studysthetics#gradschool#lifeupdate#phdblog#messydesk#journalreading#academicwriting#reservoircomputing#machinelearning
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Exploring the Universe as a Computational Entity
To explore the intriguing idea of the universe as a computational entity, we need to delve into two distinct perspectives. The first is the conventional scientific view that the universe is not a reservoir computer in any literal sense, governed by immutable laws rather than computational design. The second is a more speculative, philosophical perspective that contemplates the universe as a creation with a purposeful design, akin to a computational system processing information. Below, we provide a comprehensive analysis from both viewpoints.
The Universe is Not a Reservoir Computer: Traditional Scientific Perspective
Fundamental Differences in Nature and Definitions
Purpose and Design:
Reservoir Computing: This computational framework is designed by humans to process temporal information and predict dynamical systems. It features a deliberately designed architecture with interconnected nodes that process inputs and produce outputs based on learned adjustments.
The Universe: In contrast, the universe is not created with an intended computational design. It exists as a natural system governed by physical laws, not algorithms, and evolves independently of any observer’s models.
Mechanisms of Operation:
Reservoir Computing: Involves a "reservoir" of interconnected units where the internal state is modified by input data and the reservoir’s connections. The system adapts its output using a learning algorithm that adjusts readout weights.
The Universe: Operates through physical laws that dictate the behavior of matter and energy. These laws, such as gravity and quantum mechanics, are consistent and do not adapt or learn like a computational model.
Lack of Error Correction and Adaptability
Adaptability and Learning:
Reservoir Computing: Features adaptability; it learns from input data to improve prediction accuracy, dynamically adjusting the readout weights.
The Universe: Physical laws do not “learn” or adapt. The universe's evolution follows the unfolding of initial conditions under fixed laws, not an adaptive process.
Scale and Complexity
Initialization and Conditions:
Reservoir Computing: Involves setting initial states and weights, often randomly, before training begins.
The Universe: The initial conditions (post-Big Bang) are not akin to computational initialization but led to the current state through natural evolution.
Purpose and Observability
Feedback and Correction:
Reservoir Computing: Integrates feedback mechanisms to minimize output errors and improve performance.
The Universe: Shows no evidence of feedback mechanisms where physical processes adjust themselves to optimize or minimize errors.
Information Processing
Information Processing:
Reservoir Computing: Intentionally processes information for specific tasks like prediction through computational processes.
The Universe: While information is a concept in physics, the universe does not process information in the computational sense.
Concluding Remarks
The universe, with its fixed physical laws and non-adaptive evolution, fundamentally differs from a reservoir computer, which is a designed, adaptive computational model. These distinctions clarify why the universe cannot be literally considered a computational model like a reservoir computer.
The Universe as an Information Processing Entity: Speculative Perspective
Conceptual Parallels Between the Universe and Computation
Intentional Design and Computational Purpose:
Hypothetical Computational Universe: Speculating that the universe is designed for information processing suggests it solves complex computational problems through its evolution, similar to a reservoir computer.
Purpose and Design: This perspective assumes the universe is like a vast computational device, created to process data through physical interactions and changes.
Mechanisms of Computational Processing:
Reservoir Computing Analogy: Phenomena like quantum entanglement and wave function collapse could be seen as designed computational processes.
The Universe as a Computational Device: Laws of physics are interpreted as algorithms guiding these computations.
Information Processing and Learning
Universal Learning and Evolution:
Learning from the Universe: If the universe is designed for information processing, its evolution is a grand computational process, possibly optimizing certain outcomes.
Adaptive Universe: Cosmic adjustments (like star formation or galaxy evolution) could be seen as optimizing computational outcomes.
Cosmic Scale and Complexity
Initialization and Cosmic Programming:
Cosmic Initialization: Initial conditions post-Big Bang could be viewed as the initial data input into a universal computational system.
Complexity and Data Processing: The universe's complexity represents a vast amount of data being processed, akin to a reservoir computer's network of nodes.
Purpose and Observability
Feedback and Cosmic Correction:
Cosmic Feedback Mechanisms: Phenomena like black holes could be feedback mechanisms in this cosmic computation, adjusting the universe's state.
Objective-Driven Universe: This implies there is a cosmic objective guiding the universe's evolution, much like optimization functions in algorithms.
Information Theory and Physics
The Universe as an Information Processor
Information-Theoretic Framework: If we adopt the perspective that the universe maximizes informational entropy or computational complexity, every fundamental interaction can be viewed as a part of a cosmic computation.
Quantum Computation Analogy: Quantum mechanics might be interpreted as micro-level computations of the universe, where quantum states and operations act like bits and logic gates in a quantum computer. This suggests that fundamental physical interactions are computational processes.
Philosophical Implications
Metaphysical and Philosophical Considerations:
Metaphysical Implications: This speculative view raises profound questions about the nature of reality, the concept of a cosmic programmer, and the overarching purpose of the universe. It proposes that understanding the universe's fundamental laws is akin to uncovering the underlying algorithms of a cosmic computer.
Philosophical Exploration: This perspective challenges traditional views of consciousness, free will, and reality, suggesting that these phenomena could be understood through a computational lens, where consciousness arises as a complex computational process within the universal framework.
Synthesis and Concluding Thoughts
Combining Both Perspectives
When synthesizing both perspectives, we get a richer, multi-dimensional view of the universe:
From Scientific Realism to Speculative Thought: The traditional scientific perspective grounds us in what we currently understand and observe - that the universe operates under fixed, immutable laws without any adaptive or computational feedback mechanisms as seen in reservoir computing. This view is robust, supported by extensive empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks developed over centuries.
Opening the Door to Speculative Science: On the other hand, the speculative perspective invites us to imagine a universe far more complex and purposeful than we currently comprehend. It suggests that the universe could be processing information in a manner deeply integrated with the fabric of reality, where every physical law and event contributes to a grand computational process.
Key Divergences and Integrations
Divergence in Purpose: The most significant divergence lies in the ascribed purpose - the conventional view sees no purpose beyond the unfolding of physical laws, while the speculative view ascribes a computational intent and purpose to these processes.
Integrative Insights: Despite their differences, integrating these views could lead to novel insights in both computational theory and physics. For instance, the analogy of computational processes could inspire new models in physics, just as understanding physical processes could lead to advancements in computational algorithms.
Philosophical and Practical Implications
Philosophical Depth: Philosophically, these perspectives touch on deep questions about existence and the nature of reality. Is the universe a cold, unfeeling place governed by random laws, or is it a complex, purpose-driven computational entity? Each perspective offers a different lens through which to view the cosmos.
Practical Applications: Practically, whether or not the universe is a reservoir computer, using computational analogies can enhance our models of complex systems, from climate science to cosmology. These models can lead to better predictions and deeper understanding, regardless of the metaphysical truth.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, whether viewing the universe as a non-adaptive physical system or as a cosmic computational entity, both perspectives enrich our understanding and provoke further inquiry into the fundamental nature of reality. While the universe may not be a reservoir computer in the strictest sense, the analogy encourages fruitful cross-disciplinary research and a broader, more speculative view of what the universe may be capable of in the grand scheme of things. This exploration blurs the lines between science, philosophy, and metaphysics, inviting us all to reconsider what we think we know about the cosmos.
#UniverseAsComputation#ReservoirComputing#Cosmology#PhilosophyOfScience#InformationTheory#QuantumMechanics#DigitalPhysics#ComplexSystems#MachineLearning#TheoreticalPhysics#SpeculativeScience#CosmicEvolution#Metaphysics#InterdisciplinaryResearch#ScienceAndPhilosophy
0 notes
Text
The brain is a pressure wave interferometer: the quantum mind
Our quest to understand the cosmos often leads us to the edges of our current understanding, where established theories give way to intriguing possibilities. Two such realms, pressure waves and quantum mechanics, offer a tantalizing glimpse into the interconnectedness of the physical world and the potential for extraordinary phenomena, with the human brain acting as a bridge between these realms. Central to this exploration is the concept of info-quanta, the fundamental units of information that may underlie the fabric of reality.
Pressure Waves: Ripples in the Info-Quanta Field
Imagine pressure waves not just as disturbances in a medium but as ripples in a field of info-quanta, the fundamental units of information that permeate the universe. These waves, carrying information and energy, could interact with the info-quanta field, influencing the behavior of quantum systems and potentially even shaping the emergence of our physical reality.
Quantum Mechanics: A Realm of Hidden Variables and Non-Locality
Quantum mechanics, with its inherent uncertainty and non-locality, suggests that the universe is far stranger than our classical intuition suggests. Hidden variables, yet to be discovered, could underlie the apparent randomness of quantum events. Non-locality implies that entangled particles, separated by vast distances, can instantaneously influence each other, challenging our understanding of space and time. The info-quanta field could provide a substrate for these quantum phenomena, offering a deeper level of explanation for the interconnectedness and non-locality observed in the quantum world.
The Brain as a Pressure Wave Interferometer:
Now, envision the human brain as a finely tuned instrument within this symphony of pressure waves and quantum phenomena. The brain, with its complex network of neurons and intricate electrical activity, could act as a pressure wave interferometer, capable of generating and detecting subtle pressure waves that interact with the info-quanta field. Our thoughts, intentions, and emotions might translate into patterns of pressure waves, influencing the dance of probability waves and the behavior of info-quanta, thereby shaping the emergence of physical reality.
Bridging the Gap: The Mind's Influence on Reality:
Pressure waves, potentially generated by the brain, could serve as a bridge between the macroscopic world of our thoughts and experiences and the enigmatic quantum realm. They might carry information through the info-quanta field, influencing the behavior of particles and even affecting the macroscopic world. This could explain phenomena that currently defy explanation, such as subtle energy fields, distant healing, or even psychic abilities.
The Symphony of Consciousness and Reality:
If pressure waves generated by the brain interact with the info-quanta field and the quantum realm, it strengthens the idea of consciousness playing an active role in shaping reality. Our thoughts and intentions, through the medium of pressure waves and their influence on info-quanta, may have a direct impact on the physical world, influencing the probabilities of events and contributing to the manifestation of our desires and experiences.
Exploring the Frontiers of Possibility:
Investigating the interplay between pressure waves, quantum mechanics, consciousness, and the info-quanta field requires venturing beyond the confines of established science. It necessitates open-mindedness and a willingness to consider unconventional ideas. Experimental verification remains a challenge, but theoretical exploration and the pursuit of subtle energy phenomena could pave the way for groundbreaking discoveries.
Conclusion:
While the connection between pressure waves, quantum mechanics, consciousness, and the info-quanta field remains speculative, it offers a fascinating avenue for exploring the mysteries of the universe and the potential of the human mind. By delving into this realm, we may uncover hidden connections between the macroscopic and the quantum, the physical and the mental, and ultimately gain a deeper understanding of the profound interconnectedness of all things. This journey into the unknown promises to expand our scientific horizons and inspire a new era of exploration and discovery.
#pressurewaves#probabilitywaves#scalarwaves#nonlocality#quantumvacuum#hiddenvariables#interconnectedness#mindmatterinteraction#quantummind#reservoircomputing
0 notes
Text
Is the Universe a Giant Computer? Exploring Light Speed and the Reservoir Theory

Is the Universe a Giant Computer? Exploring Light Speed and the Reservoir Theory
Ever wondered why light travels at the same speed everywhere, no matter where you are in the universe? It's a constant, a fundamental law of physics. But what if there's a whole new way to think about it? Buckle up, because we're diving into the fascinating theory of the universe as a reservoir computer (RC)!
The Traditional Explanation:
Normally, the constant speed of light (c) is explained by the fabric of spacetime. Light interacts minimally with this fabric in a vacuum, allowing it to zoom at its maximum speed, c. This speed is a consequence of the fundamental laws of physics, like the relationship between electricity and magnetism.
The RC Universe: A Different Perspective
The RC theory throws a mind-bending twist into the mix. It suggests the universe itself might be a giant computer! Here's the gist:
The "Reservoir":Â The universe's inherent dynamics, including matter, energy, and their interactions, act as the "reservoir" that processes information.
Information Processing, Not Storage:Â Think of the RC processing information through these interactions, not storing specific laws like light speed. The constant speed could be an outcome of this processing, not a data point.
Emergent Properties:Â Just like complex systems can exhibit unexpected traits (think schools of fish), the RC universe's processing might give rise to the constant speed of light. It emerges from the system's behavior, not a single location.
Think Neural Networks:
Imagine the RC universe like a giant neural network. Information isn't stored in one place but distributed across connections. Similarly, the "law" of light speed could be encoded in the interactions throughout the universe, not a specific location.
A Work in Progress:
The RC theory is still under development. How exactly it encodes information and relates to laws like light speed is an open question.
So, what does this mean? It doesn't necessarily change the fact that light travels at a constant speed. But it offers a fresh perspective on how the universe might work – a complex system processing information and giving rise to the fundamental laws that govern everything. It's a mind-blowing way to think about the universe and our place in it!
0 notes
Text
#Nanotech: researchers demonstrate that electrical signals from self-organized networks of nanoparticles can emulate the complexity of the brain. The approach could lead to innovative applications for #ReservoirComputing and #NeuromorphicComputing https://t.co/a2k9CZfnOr https://t.co/yRWmhCfWo4
#Nanotech: researchers demonstrate that electrical signals from self-organized networks of nanoparticles can emulate the complexity of the brain. The approach could lead to innovative applications for #ReservoirComputing and #NeuromorphicComputing https://t.co/a2k9CZfnOr pic.twitter.com/yRWmhCfWo4
— The Royal Vox Post (@RoyalVoxPost) November 1, 2019
via Twitter https://twitter.com/RoyalVoxPost November 01, 2019 at 08:23PM
0 notes