#SERP

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Google’s enshittification memos

[Note, 9 October 2023: Google disputes the veracity of this claim, but has declined to provide the exhibits and testimony to support its claims. Read more about this here.]

When I think about how the old, good internet turned into the enshitternet, I imagine a series of small compromises, each seemingly reasonable at the time, each contributing to a cultural norm of making good things worse, and worse, and worse.

Think about Unity President Marc Whitten's nonpology for his company's disastrous rug-pull, in which they declared that everyone who had paid good money to use their tool to make a game would have to keep paying, every time someone downloaded that game:

The most fundamental thing that we’re trying to do is we’re building a sustainable business for Unity. And for us, that means that we do need to have a model that includes some sort of balancing change, including shared success.

https://www.wired.com/story/unity-walks-back-policies-lost-trust/

"Shared success" is code for, "If you use our tool to make money, we should make money too." This is bullshit. It's like saying, "We just want to find a way to share the success of the painters who use our brushes, so every time you sell a painting, we want to tax that sale." Or "Every time you sell a house, the company that made the hammer gets to wet its beak."

And note that they're not talking about shared risk here – no one at Unity is saying, "If you try to make a game with our tools and you lose a million bucks, we're on the hook for ten percent of your losses." This isn't partnership, it's extortion.

How did a company like Unity – which became a market leader by making a tool that understood the needs of game developers and filled them – turn into a protection racket? One bad decision at a time. One rationalization and then another. Slowly, and then all at once.

When I think about this enshittification curve, I often think of Google, a company that had its users' backs for years, which created a genuinely innovative search engine that worked so well it seemed like *magic, a company whose employees often had their pick of jobs, but chose the "don't be evil" gig because that mattered to them.

People make fun of that "don't be evil" motto, but if your key employees took the gig because they didn't want to be evil, and then you ask them to be evil, they might just quit. Hell, they might make a stink on the way out the door, too:

https://theintercept.com/2018/09/13/google-china-search-engine-employee-resigns/

Google is a company whose founders started out by publishing a scientific paper describing their search methodology, in which they said, "Oh, and by the way, ads will inevitably turn your search engine into a pile of shit, so we're gonna stay the fuck away from them":

http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf

Those same founders retained a controlling interest in the company after it went IPO, explaining to investors that they were going to run the business without having their elbows jostled by shortsighted Wall Street assholes, so they could keep it from turning into a pile of shit:

https://abc.xyz/investor/founders-letters/ipo-letter/

And yet, it's turned into a pile of shit. Google search is so bad you might as well ask Jeeves. The company's big plan to fix it? Replace links to webpages with florid paragraphs of chatbot nonsense filled with a supremely confident lies:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/14/googles-ai-hype-circle/

How did the company get this bad? In part, this is the "curse of bigness." The company can't grow by attracting new users. When you have 90%+ of the market, there are no new customers to sign up. Hypothetically, they could grow by going into new lines of business, but Google is incapable of making a successful product in-house and also kills most of the products it buys from other, more innovative companies:

https://killedbygoogle.com/

Theoretically, the company could pursue new lines of business in-house, and indeed, the current leaders of companies like Amazon, Microsoft and Apple are all execs who figured out how to get the whole company to do something new, and were elevated to the CEO's office, making each one a billionaire and sealing their place in history.

It is for this very reason that any exec at a large firm who tries to make a business-wide improvement gets immediately and repeatedly knifed by all their colleagues, who correctly reason that if someone else becomes CEO, then they won't become CEO. Machiavelli was an optimist:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/28/microincentives-and-enshittification/

With no growth from new customers, and no growth from new businesses, "growth" has to come from squeezing workers (say, laying off 12,000 engineers after a stock buyback that would have paid their salaries for the next 27 years), or business customers (say, by colluding with Facebook to rig the ad market with the Jedi Blue conspiracy), or end-users.

Now, in theory, we might never know exactly what led to the enshittification of Google. In theory, all of compromises, debates and plots could be lost to history. But tech is not an oral culture, it's a written one, and techies write everything down and nothing is ever truly deleted.

Time and again, Big Tech tells on itself. Think of FTX's main conspirators all hanging out in a group chat called "Wirefraud." Amazon naming its program targeting weak, small publishers the "Gazelle Project" ("approach these small publishers the way a cheetah would pursue a sickly gazelle”). Amazon documenting the fact that users were unknowingly signing up for Prime and getting pissed; then figuring out how to reduce accidental signups, then deciding not to do it because it liked the money too much. Think of Zuck emailing his CFO in the middle of the night to defend his outsized offer to buy Instagram on the basis that users like Insta better and Facebook couldn't compete with them on quality.

It's like every Big Tech schemer has a folder on their desktop called "Mens Rea" filled with files like "Copy_of_Premeditated_Murder.docx":

https://doctorow.medium.com/big-tech-cant-stop-telling-on-itself-f7f0eb6d215a?sk=351f8a54ab8e02d7340620e5eec5024d

Right now, Google's on trial for its sins against antitrust law. It's a hard case to make. To secure a win, the prosecutors at the DoJ Antitrust Division are going to have to prove what was going on in Google execs' minds when the took the actions that led to the company's dominance. They're going to have to show that the company deliberately undertook to harm its users and customers.

Of course, it helps that Google put it all in writing.

Last week, there was a huge kerfuffile over the DoJ's practice of posting its exhibits from the trial to a website each night. This is a totally normal thing to do – a practice that dates back to the Microsoft antitrust trial. But Google pitched a tantrum over this and said that the docs the DoJ were posting would be turned into "clickbait." Which is another way of saying, "the public would find these documents very interesting, and they would be damning to us and our case":

https://www.bigtechontrial.com/p/secrecy-is-systemic

After initially deferring to Google, Judge Amit Mehta finally gave the Justice Department the greenlight to post the document. It's up. It's wild:

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-09/416692.pdf

The document is described as "notes for a course on communication" that Google VP for Finance Michael Roszak prepared. Roszak says he can't remember whether he ever gave the presentation, but insists that the remit for the course required him to tell students "things I didn't believe," and that's why the document is "full of hyperbole and exaggeration."

OK.

But here's what the document says: "search advertising is one of the world's greatest business models ever created…illicit businesses (cigarettes or drugs) could rival these economics…[W]e can mostly ignore the demand side…(users and queries) and only focus on the supply side of advertisers, ad formats and sales."

It goes on to say that this might be changing, and proposes a way to balance the interests of the search and ads teams, which are at odds, with search worrying that ads are pushing them to produce "unnatural search experiences to chase revenue."

"Unnatural search experiences to chase revenue" is a thinly veiled euphemism for the prophetic warnings in that 1998 Pagerank paper: "The goals of the advertising business model do not always correspond to providing quality search to users." Or, more plainly, "ads will turn our search engine into a pile of shit."

And, as Roszak writes, Google is "able to ignore one of the fundamental laws of economics…supply and demand." That is, the company has become so dominant and cemented its position so thoroughly as the default search engine across every platforms and system that even if it makes its search terrible to goose revenues, users won't leave. As Lily Tomlin put it on SNL: "We don't have to care, we're the phone company."

In the enshittification cycle, companies first lure in users with surpluses – like providing the best search results rather than the most profitable ones – with an eye to locking them in. In Google's case, that lock-in has multiple facets, but the big one is spending billions of dollars – enough to buy a whole Twitter, every single year – to be the default search everywhere.

Google doesn't buy its way to dominance because it has the very best search results and it wants to shield you from inferior competitors. The economically rational case for buying default position is that preventing competition is more profitable than succeeding by outperforming competitors. The best reason to buy the default everywhere is that it lets you lower quality without losing business. You can "ignore the demand side, and only focus on advertisers."

For a lot of people, the analysis stops here. "If you're not paying for the product, you're the product." Google locks in users and sells them to advertisers, who are their co-conspirators in a scheme to screw the rest of us.

But that's not right. For one thing, paying for a product doesn't mean you won't be the product. Apple charges a thousand bucks for an iPhone and then nonconsensually spies on every iOS user in order to target ads to them (and lies about it):

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

John Deere charges six figures for its tractors, then runs a grift that blocks farmers from fixing their own machines, and then uses their control over repair to silence farmers who complain about it:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/31/dealers-choice/#be-a-shame-if-something-were-to-happen-to-it

Fair treatment from a corporation isn't a loyalty program that you earn by through sufficient spending. Companies that can sell you out, will sell you out, and then cry victim, insisting that they were only doing their fiduciary duty for their sacred shareholders. Companies are disciplined by fear of competition, regulation or – in the case of tech platforms – customers seizing the means of computation and installing ad-blockers, alternative clients, multiprotocol readers, etc:

https://doctorow.medium.com/an-audacious-plan-to-halt-the-internets-enshittification-and-throw-it-into-reverse-3cc01e7e4604?sk=85b3f5f7d051804521c3411711f0b554

Which is where the next stage of enshittification comes in: when the platform withdraws the surplus it had allocated to lure in – and then lock in – business customers (like advertisers) and reallocate it to the platform's shareholders.

For Google, there are several rackets that let it screw over advertisers as well as searchers (the advertisers are paying for the product, and they're also the product). Some of those rackets are well-known, like Jedi Blue, the market-rigging conspiracy that Google and Facebook colluded on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedi_Blue

But thanks to the antitrust trial, we're learning about more of these. Megan Gray – ex-FTC, ex-DuckDuckGo – was in the courtroom last week when evidence was presented on Google execs' panic over a decline in "ad generating searches" and the sleazy gimmick they came up with to address it: manipulating the "semantic matching" on user queries:

https://www.wired.com/story/google-antitrust-lawsuit-search-results/

When you send a query to Google, it expands that query with terms that are similar – for example, if you search on "Weds" it might also search for "Wednesday." In the slides shown in the Google trial, we learned about another kind of semantic matching that Google performed, this one intended to turn your search results into "a twisted shopping mall you can’t escape."

Here's how that worked: when you ran a query like "children's clothing," Google secretly appended the brand name of a kids' clothing manufacturer to the query. This, in turn, triggered a ton of ads – because rival brands will have bought ads against their competitors' name (like Pepsi buying ads that are shown over queries for Coke).

Here we see surpluses being taken away from both end-users and business customers – that is, searchers and advertisers. For searchers, it doesn't matter how much you refine your query, you're still going to get crummy search results because there's an unkillable, hidden search term stuck to your query, like a piece of shit that Google keeps sticking to the sole of your shoe.

But for advertisers, this is also a scam. They're paying to be matched to users who search on a brand name, and you didn't search on that brand name. It's especially bad for the company whose name has been appended to your search, because Google has a protection racket where the company that matches your search has to pay extra in order to show up overtop of rivals who are worse matches. Both the matching company and those rivals have given Google a credit-card that Google gets to bill every time a user searches on the company's name, and Google is just running fraudulent charges through those cards.

And, of course, Google put this in writing. I mean, of course they did. As we learned from the documentary The Incredibles, supervillains can't stop themselves from monologuing, and in big, sprawling monopolists, these monologues have to transmitted electronically – and often indelibly – to far-flung co-cabalists.

As Gray points out, this is an incredibly blunt enshittification technique: "it hadn’t even occurred to me that Google just flat out deletes queries and replaces them with ones that monetize better." We don't know how long Google did this for or how frequently this bait-and-switch was deployed.

But if this is a blunt way of Google smashing its fist down on the scales that balance search quality against ad revenues, there's plenty of subtler ways the company could sneak a thumb on there. A Google exec at the trial rhapsodized about his company's "contract with the user" to deliver an "honest results policy," but given how bad Google search is these days, we're left to either believe he's lying or that Google sucks at search.

The paper trail offers a tantalizing look at how a company went from doing something that was so good it felt like a magic trick to being "able to ignore one of the fundamental laws of economics…supply and demand," able to "ignore the demand side…(users and queries) and only focus on the supply side of advertisers."

What's more, this is a system where everyone loses (except for Google): this isn't a grift run by Google and advertisers on users – it's a grift Google runs on everyone.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/03/not-feeling-lucky/#fundamental-laws-of-economics

My next novel is The Lost Cause, a hopeful novel of the climate emergency. Amazon won't sell the audiobook, so I made my own and I'm pre-selling it on Kickstarter!

[floragators]

Smooching the Sandworm Entity

Me when I turn my Beetlejuice Self insert into basically the embodiment of a sandworm. And ofc because I selfship with him, he is now kissing a sandworm

I would say this is just one of their many different forms they can turn into, their got normal humanoid one, a sandworm headed, their monstrous, and then full on Sandworm. Im honestly proud of coming up with this idea for them teheh

[varundigital]

Climbing the #searchenginerankings isn't just about good #content—it's about smart strategies and consistent efforts! If you're aiming for that top spot on #Google, we’re here to guide you every step of the way: https://www.varundigitalmedia.com 👉 📧 info@varundigitalmedia.com 👉 📲 (+1) 877-768-2786

[clickonitsolution]

A visually engaging scene that represents the world of SEO and digital marketing. In the foreground, a laptop screen displays a search engine results page (SERP) with a website ranking at the top. Around the laptop, a variety of icons float representing key aspects of digital marketing: a magnifying glass for SEO research, social media icons for content sharing, a graph showing upward growth for analytics, and a mobile phone for mobile marketing. In the background, a digital world map and abstract charts symbolize global reach and data-driven decisions. The color palette is modern with a tech-inspired vibe, incorporating blues, purples, and hints of neon accents for a sleek, futuristic feel.

[calliopeservices2]

AI Reputation Manager : Le Nouveau Métier pour Référencer Votre Entreprise sur les Plateformes IA

L’intelligence artificielle (IA) transforme notre façon de communiquer, d’interagir et même de gérer la réputation des entreprises. Aujourd’hui, un nouveau métier émerge : l’AI Reputation Manager. Ce professionnel est spécialisé dans l’optimisation de la présence et de la réputation d’une entreprise sur les plateformes alimentées par l’IA. Ce rôle s’inscrit désormais dans l’offre de Communication & Marketing Digital de Calliope Services, qui accompagne les entreprises dans leur transformation digitale.

L’intelligence artificielle (IA) transforme notre façon de communiquer, d’interagir et même de gérer la réputation des entreprises. Aujourd’hui, un nouveau métier émerge : l’AI Reputation Manager. Ce professionnel est spécialisé dans l’optimisation de la présence et de la réputation d’une entreprise sur les plateformes alimentées par l’IA. Ce rôle s’inscrit désormais dans l’offre de Communication…

[obrazkovepribehy]

23-27

[negreabsolut]

Uròbor.

[yestothenet]

Comment Maîtriser les Fondamentaux du SEO pour Booster Votre Visibilité en Ligne

Le référencement naturel (SEO) est un levier essentiel pour toute entreprise cherchant à se démarquer dans un paysage numérique de plus en plus concurrentiel. En maîtrisant les bases du SEO, vous pouvez non seulement attirer davantage de visiteurs sur votre site, mais aussi améliorer leur expérience utilisateur et, par conséquent, augmenter vos taux de conversion. Ce blog vous présente les éléments fondamentaux à prendre en compte pour optimiser efficacement votre site web.

Pour plus d'information consulter le site YES TO THE NET

1. L'Importance des Mots Clés

Les mots clés sont le pilier de toute stratégie SEO réussie. Ils reflètent les termes que vos clients potentiels utilisent pour rechercher vos produits ou services en ligne. Une stratégie de mots clés bien définie commence par une recherche approfondie pour identifier les mots clés les plus pertinents et les intégrer de manière naturelle dans votre contenu.

Recherche de mots clés : Utilisez des outils comme Google Keyword Planner pour découvrir les mots clés qui génèrent du trafic.

Utilisation dans le contenu : Placez ces mots clés dans les titres, les balises meta, et les textes pour optimiser le contenu de manière organique.

2. L'Optimisation de Contenu

L'optimisation de contenu consiste à rendre votre contenu pertinent et accessible pour les moteurs de recherche tout en étant engageant pour les utilisateurs. Cela inclut l'utilisation des balises H1, l'intégration des mots clés, et l'optimisation des éléments visuels tels que les images.

Balise H1 : Utilisez une balise H1 claire et descriptive pour structurer le contenu de votre page.

Optimisation des images : Réduisez la taille des images pour améliorer la vitesse de chargement et ajoutez des balises alt pour renforcer le SEO.

3. L'Importance des Backlinks

Les backlinks sont essentiels pour renforcer l'autorité de domaine de votre site. Un backlink de qualité, provenant d'un site pertinent et crédible, peut considérablement améliorer votre positionnement dans les SERP (Search Engine Results Pages).

Stratégie de backlinks : Encouragez la création de liens vers votre site en produisant du contenu de qualité que d'autres sites voudront partager.

4. SEO Technique : Optimisez la Structure de Votre Site

Le SEO technique est tout aussi crucial que le contenu lui-même. Il s'agit d'optimiser les aspects techniques de votre site pour améliorer sa visibilité et son indexation par les moteurs de recherche.

Vitesse de chargement : Un site rapide est non seulement agréable pour les utilisateurs, mais aussi favorisé par Google. Utilisez des outils comme Google PageSpeed Insights pour identifier et corriger les problèmes de performance.

Indexation : Assurez-vous que vos pages sont correctement indexées par Google à l'aide de la Google Search Console.

SEO mobile : Avec une majorité des utilisateurs accédant à internet via des smartphones, un site optimisé pour les mobiles est incontournable.

5. SEO On-Page et Off-Page

Le SEO se divise en deux grandes catégories : SEO on-page et SEO off-page. Le SEO on-page concerne toutes les optimisations que vous pouvez apporter directement sur votre site, tandis que le SEO off-page se concentre sur l'amélioration de votre présence en ligne via des actions externes, comme l'acquisition de backlinks.

SEO on-page : Portez une attention particulière à la qualité du contenu, à la structure des URLs, et à l'expérience utilisateur.

SEO off-page : Concentrez-vous sur la création de liens entrants et la gestion de votre réputation en ligne.

6. Utilisation de Google Analytics et Audit SEO

Pour garantir l'efficacité de votre stratégie SEO, il est essentiel de mesurer régulièrement vos performances et d'ajuster vos efforts en conséquence.

Google Analytics : Cet outil vous permet de suivre le comportement des utilisateurs sur votre site, d'identifier les pages les plus performantes, et de détecter les points faibles.

Audit SEO : Réalisez un audit SEO complet pour évaluer la santé de votre site et mettre en place des améliorations nécessaires.

Conclusion

Le SEO est un investissement à long terme qui, lorsqu'il est bien maîtrisé, peut générer des résultats durables pour votre entreprise. En comprenant et en appliquant les fondamentaux du référencement naturel, de l'optimisation de contenu, du SEO technique, et des backlinks, vous pouvez améliorer significativement la visibilité de votre site web et atteindre vos objectifs commerciaux. N'oubliez pas que le SEO est un processus continu qui nécessite une attention régulière et des ajustements en fonction des évolutions des algorithmes de Google et des comportements des utilisateurs.

[imageonline]

Choosing the Right SEO Partner: Why Your Business Needs the Best SEO Company

In the present computerized age, having a web-based presence is as of now not an extravagance however a need. Be that as it may, just having a site isn't sufficient. To really succeed on the web, your business needs the ability of a SEO company that grasps the complexities of web search tool calculations and client conduct. In any case, with such countless choices out there, how would you find the Best SEO Company for your requirements?

What Makes an SEO Company Stand Out?

A SEO company is something beyond a specialist co-op; it's an accomplice in your business' development. The right SEO company won't just further develop your site's positioning on web indexes however will likewise assist you with understanding your crowd better, guaranteeing that your site draws in the right sort of rush hour gridlock. While searching for the best SEO company, think about their experience, client tributes, and the methodologies they use to accomplish results.

Why Partner with a Professional SEO Agency?

An expert Seo Agency offers an abundance of involvement of real value. They stay refreshed with the most recent changes in web crawler calculations and can adjust procedures rapidly to keep up with or work on your webpage's rankings. Cooperating with the best SEO company guarantees that your business is dependably on the ball, giving you an upper hand in your industry.

Conclusion

Picking the right  SEO company can have a significant effect in your web-based achievement. Whether you're searching for a full-administration SEO agency or the Best SEO Company in the business, ensure they line up with your business objectives and can convey the outcomes you really want. Putting resources into Website optimization is an interest in your business' future, so pick shrewdly!

[shiominato]

serp

[venkat3681]

Enhance your website's SEO with off-page strategies. Explore the difference between on-page and off-page SEO, learn techniques like backlink building, social media marketing, content marketing, digital PR, guest posting, and local listings. Get your website ranking higher in SERPs with these valuable insights.

#SEO #OffPageSEO #DigitalMarketing #Backlinks #SocialMediaMarketing #ContentMarketing #DigitalPR #GuestPosting #LocalListings #SERP #OnlineVisibility

[floragators]

Cartoon Beetlejuice Serp/Self Insert: Saint Pente

Saint Pente, real name being Serpentis, is a fallen ‘angel’ who resides in the neitherworld, and occasionally travels to the living world, to scam poor souls, dead or alive, for their blessing in return for a place ‘above.’ Basically a con artist who is absolutely untrustworthy to sell your soul to.

They have a thing going on with Beetlejuice and does try to deny being in love with him despite very much so being smitten by the crusty guy. Pente finds him very attractive, its that gross bugman rizz. Do not be fooled by their appearance, Pente and Beetlejuice basically have the same energy and are practically two sides of the same coin except if Beetlejuice actually was clean and had ‘some’ standards. Basically a match made in the neitherworld.

Aside from being an cynical asshole, they can be pretty motherly and act as some sort of parental figure towards Lydia, even being protective and teacher like at times. However they are also more like that chill aunt that lets you do things without care. Very much so depending on their mood, they are indecisive as hell (just like me). Think Eda from the Owl House almost.

Also Saint Pente is basically a sandworm-like entity as well as a motherly figure to sandworms. Very much a powerful being since they can quite literally eat both the dead and the living. When they are really pissed off, they do transform into either a lamia like creature or just full on sandworm. I do imagine their job before was to guide the deceased to the right direction and not wonder off until ofc, they got ‘fired’ to put it lightly lmao.

Some more small facts, they have a cane that is in likeness of a sandworm, their glasses works as their pupils, has an ex girlfriend who they sometimes got awkward encounters with, and they are nonbinary and go by they/them

I shall draw them soon and also with Toonjuice cause I absolutely love the guy sm!! Excuse me for taking some creative liberty with this self insert since ofc im just having fun and Im craving the gross man sm.

[varundigital]

Ranking at the top of search engine results is no longer a desirable goal, but a crucial requirement for businesses to remain relevant, competitive, and visible to their target audience.

Let’s ensure your brand gets the spotlight it deserves: www.varundigitalmedia.com 👉 📧 info@varundigitalmedia.com 👉 📲 (+1) 877-768-2786

[charlotte-queen-owl]

IT WAS ME >:]

@serpent-hell

and yeah, the ginger is Childe

Oh my fucking god.

[fueldigimarketing]

Best Seo Company in Coimbatore | Fueldigi Marketing Pvt Ltd

FDM is one of the best seo company in coimbatore. For more details Contact us: at 91+ 9791811111 or visit our website