#Sampling Inspection Assignment Help

[diligence-certifications]

How does BIS certification enhance the credibility of your products in the market?

BIS Certification: Giving Your Product a  Greater Edge to Market Credibility

In this competitive market today-the trust of the consumer and his credibility-so must be of concern for success. For gear manufacturers, building this trust depends more often on proving that it stands up to higher quality and safety standards. The BIS Certification plays a pivotal role in enhancing market credibility and tilting the scales into favor of certain manufacturers.

The BIS Certification, administered by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the National Standards Body of India, is a kind of guarantee provided to the consumer that your goods meet certain specified quality and performance criteria. By employing stringent tests on your products and evaluating them under particular Indian Standards (IS), you have indicated that your business stands for safe, reliable, and good quality products, along with a promise for the same. This directly translates into increased trust and preference by consumers.

BIS Scheme I Certification is perhaps the most familiar, of which the Indian Standards Mark (ISI Mark) forms a part. The mark, attested onto the products for which certification exists, acts as an instant quality-association in the minds of consumers. The instant existence of ISI Mark on your gears generates trust as there is an independent verification by a reputed organization. This becomes more important in a market where counterfeit and substandard goods stand high in faking.

Beyond merely affixing a mark on a product, BIS Certification is a process that profoundly accentuates your organization's commitment to quality. It has the following components:

Thorough Testing: Samples of your equipment undergo rigorous scrutiny in an accredited laboratory to ensure that they meet the standards laid down in the Indian Standards. These tests are carried out to assess material composition, behavior under stress, durability, and safety. Successful clearing of these tests shows that your product conforms to the minimum requirements.

Factory Inspection: The BIS conducts inspection of the factory premises to check quality measures that are adopted during manufacture. This ensures the maintenance of quality in the product and is not just a once-off event.

Continuing Surveillance: Once the certification has been granted, BIS undertakes continuous surveillance audits and market sampling to ensure that the product continues to conform to accepted standards, giving an assurance to consumers on the quality and safety of the product.

The pursuit of BIS Certification inculcates a culture of continuous quality improvement in your organization. Preparing for BIS certification often requires that you put in place solid quality management systems and streamline processes, and tighten internal controls. Eventually, the resultant outcome is improved product quality, fewer defects, and higher efficiency.

You might think the assigning process is rather taxing, but the worthiness of the BIS Certification cannot be doubted. The commitment itself to the national standards lets you have the following benefits:

Enhanced Brand Reputation: Having ISI mark creates trust and credibility for the consumers; it upgrades the image and reputation of the brand in the market.

Increased Market Access: In some sectors the BIS certification acts as a compulsion while selling certain products in India. In this respect, it opens up avenues for government tenders and procurement where preference or sole consideration is given to BIS-certified products.

Competitive Advantage: If the market is flooded with similar products, BIS certification helps to distinguish your gear and gives you that much-needed competitive edge in drawing in customers that value quality and reliability.

Reduced Risk of Product Recall: The better a product conforms to Type Design BIS, the lesser is the chance of product recall on account of safety issues and quality defect, hence protecting brand reputation and gracing profitability to the applicant.

[grapesinnovations]

Hospital Management Software That Redefines Healthcare Efficiency | Grapes IDMR

Hospitals today are no longer just centers for treatment they're dynamic ecosystems involving patient care, workforce management, inventory control, billing, and compliance. But without a centralized digital system, hospitals risk inefficiency, miscommunication, and delays that can directly impact care quality.

Enter IDMR, the flagship hospital management software developed by Grapes Innovative Solutions, designed to digitize every critical operation of your healthcare facility from the front desk to the operating room. Built to improve productivity, accountability, and decision-making, IDMR is the digital nerve center that today’s hospitals need.

Let’s unpack how this cutting-edge software is shaping the future of hospital operations.

Introducing IDMR: The Complete HMS from Grapes IDMR

IDMR (Integrated Digital Medical Records) is an all-in-one HMS solution created by Grapes IDMR, a leading software provider based in Kochi. Unlike generic systems, IDMR is specifically tailored for Indian hospitals offering seamless operations in multi-specialty environments, clinics, and diagnostic centers.

Whether you run a standalone clinic or a 500-bed facility, IDMR adapts to your workflow without complexity.

What Is Hospital Management Software?

Hospital Management Software (HMS) is an integrated digital platform that centralizes administrative, financial, clinical, and operational functions in a hospital or healthcare center. A powerful HMS helps facilities:

Automate patient registration

Track inpatient and outpatient services

Manage pharmacy and inventory

Handle billing, insurance, and claims

Improve communication between departments

Maintain regulatory and audit compliance

A hospital that uses HMS gains the benefit of reduced errors, better resource planning, and faster decision-making all while ensuring top-notch patient care.

Why Hospitals Trust IDMR for Critical Operations

1.Centralized Patient Management

From registration to discharge, every patient touchpoint is captured digitally. IDMR makes it easy to record visits, access patient history, assign rooms, and generate discharge summaries in just a few clicks.

2.Real-Time OP/IP Tracking

The system monitors real-time outpatient visits and inpatient admissions, enabling smoother transitions and less confusion at help desks and nursing stations.

3.Financial Control with Billing & Insurance

Generate accurate bills, track payments, and integrate insurance claims all through IDMR’s finance module. It supports multiple payment methods and auto-calculates taxes, discounts, and credits.

4.Pharmacy & Medicine Inventory

Manage stock levels, monitor expiry dates, automate reorders, and link pharmacy with prescriptions to ensure patients get the right medicine, at the right time.

5.Staff and Resource Monitoring

IDMR tracks doctor schedules, duty rosters, and even staff leaves. It helps HR and administrators keep tabs on staff availability, shift allocations, and performance logs.

6.Compliance and Audit Trail

Every activity from login to report generation is logged in IDMR, making audit trails traceable and transparent. Ideal for NABH compliance and government inspections.

Designed for Every Department

IDMR’s modular approach supports each department with specialized tools:

 Lab Management – Test order entry, sample tracking, report automation

 Radiology Module – Scan request to report generation

 Appointment Scheduler – Time slot booking and automated reminders

 Procurement – Stock entry, vendor management, purchase approvals

 Ward Management – Bed allocation, occupancy reports, transfer logs

Everything you need, in one platform.

Why Choose Grapes Innovative Solutions?

Grapes Innovative Solutions is not just a software company it’s a healthcare tech partner with years of experience solving real-world hospital problems. The team behind IDMR understands the operational pain points hospitals face and delivers intuitive, scalable solutions.

Other Products by Grapes:

My HRM – Advanced employee tracking & leave management

Third Eye – Asset tracking and equipment management

Vedha – Smart medicine dispensing and inventory tool

360 Degree – Remote PC control from your mobile

Each of these tools integrates with IDMR, creating a holistic hospital ecosystem.

The ROI of Going Digital

Hospitals that implement IDMR report:

 40% time savings in administrative tasks

 30% increase in revenue from accurate billing and faster processes

 100% digital audit readiness

 Improved staff productivity and fewer HR complaints

In a field where every second counts, IDMR ensures every department runs in sync.

conclusion

Grapes Innovative Solutions has set a new standard in healthcare management with its cutting-edge Hospital Management Software. By seamlessly integrating advanced technology and user-centric design, this software not only enhances operational efficiency but also significantly improves patient care and experience. Its ability to streamline processes, facilitate real-time data access, and foster effective communication among healthcare professionals makes it an invaluable asset in today’s fast-paced healthcare environment. As hospitals and healthcare facilities strive for excellence, adopting Grapes' solutions will undoubtedly empower them to achieve their goals, ultimately redefining the future of healthcare delivery.

Contact Us: +91 7510330000 Email: grapeshms@gmail.com Visit Website:Best hospital management software

Frequently Asked Questions

Can IDMR be customized for different hospital sizes?Yes. Whether it’s a small clinic or a multi-specialty hospital, IDMR modules are scalable and can be activated as needed.

Does the system support multi-location hospitals?Absolutely. IDMR allows centralized control over multiple branches and generates consolidated reports across locations.

Is training provided for hospital staff?Yes. Grapes Innovative Solutions offers full onboarding support, staff training, and post-implementation assistance to ensure a smooth transition.

[a-soft-fluffy-girl]

I think what angers me the most is the treatment of David Lochridge, a Scottish immigrant brought onto OceanGate's team by Stockton Rush himself. Lochridge was the whistleblower, but not even due to really wanting to hurt anyone. The man wanted to help, and was literally doing his assigned job as the assigned pilot. It was the pilot's duty to effectively "sign off" on the vessel, and make sure it was ready to be, well, piloted. He was also the director of marine operations, and as such:

Lochridge had a contract specifying that he was ultimately responsible for “ensuring the safety of all crew and clients.”

Wanna know what he was told when he did this? When he tried to report on issues that, by definition, would ensure the safety of all crew and clients?

OceanGate’s position was that such matters were outside the scope of his responsibilities; he was “not hired to provide engineering services, or to design or develop Cyclops II (the Titan submersible),” the company later said, in a court filing.

Mhm. He told them, more than once, of issues that would endanger people. His job as director of operations. And got told "no, that isn't your job".

But that isn't even the best part. He was told to do a full inspection. And this was, effectively, the straw that broke MULTIPLE backs of this whole damn affair. He submitted his review, and lemme tell ya. It was glowing.

Glue was coming away from the seams of ballast bags, and mounting bolts threatened to rupture them; both sealing faces had errant plunge holes and O-ring grooves that deviated from standard design parameters. The exostructure and electrical pods used different metals, which could result in galvanic corrosion when exposed to seawater. The thruster cables posed “snagging hazards”; the iridium satellite beacon, to transmit the submersible’s position after surfacing, was attached with zip ties. The flooring was highly flammable; the interior vinyl wrapping emitted “highly toxic gasses upon ignition.” To assess the carbon-fibre hull, Lochridge examined a small cross-section of material. He found that it had “very visible signs of delamination and porosity”—it seemed possible that, after repeated dives, it would come apart. He shone a light at the sample from behind, and photographed beams streaming through splits in the midsection in a disturbing, irregular pattern. The only safe way to dive, Lochridge concluded, was to first carry out a full scan of the hull.

He was fired for this report. Let me repeat that.

He was fired. For doing. His job.

When told by others in the submersible industry that he'd effectively be responsible for the deaths of anyone inside there if he did not make this review public, he contacted OSHA and the Coast Guard regarding this. OceanGate's response?

Sue him, then threaten to remove his immigration rights and bleed him dry with the legal fees.

Yep. A fucking SLAPP suit to silence him with the threat of fucking deportation. I'm serious. Half a year of dragging this man through the muck of the US legal system with, and I am quoting the article yet again here, "threats of deportation", just to shut him up because Rush was pissed he got told his submersible wasn't safe.

That, to me, really is the crux of it all and reveals everything about the whole fucking situation to me. Rush was so goddamn butthurt he got told "no", he tried to absolutely ruin anyone who told him that. And it got him and four other people fucking killed because of an ego the size of the fucking Pacific Ocean.

oh my god this New Yorker article about the Titan holy fucking shit fuck???

[dzthenerd490]

File: 4.n0m4ly - 1999 Tunnels

.

Original Creator: @4.n0m4ly_

Go Support their YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@4.n0m4ly_

.

SCP#: ALN

Code Name: The Ruined Sarkic Sanctuary

Object Class: Homager

Special Containment Procedures: The surface area of SCP-ALN has been sealed off and labeled as a sinkhole hazard. A Foundation area was constructed on top with several tents for MTF security and researchers in the area. On a weekly basis a research team with the appropriate security and protection gear are to enter SCP-ALN and collect samples as well as collect expedition drones sent inside and deploy new drones. On the off chance a hostile entity manifests within SCP-ALN and attacks the research team, Mobile Task Force Ares-10 “Butchers from Hell” are to respond and either contain or neutralize the entity depending on the situation. Any entity that is deemed necessary for containment at an official Foundation site must be approved by three Administrative Staff members and the assigned Site Director. If not approved the entity must be neutralized, cataloged, and harvested of anomalous properties, there are no exceptions. 

Description: SCP-ALN is an underground abandoned subway system located in [data expunged], Turkey. It was revealed after a series of earthquakes began in the western section of the country. As stated before, within SCP-ALN is a subway system long abandoned by civilization but in reality it was abandoned by humans not Sarkites. Each and every tunnel of SCP-ALN has a red moss-like growth that seems to give off spores of an anomalous fungus. This fungus grows quickly on all inorganic material covering it and making it corrode into nothing. Why it does this is assumed to help expose victims to the anomalous bacteria in the air, however said bacteria has been tested and proven non hazardous in any way. 

Instead the bacteria in the air of SCP-ALN seems to be able to keep meat fresh for extensive periods of time. This is shown as some of the more clear tunnels have hundreds of crates and boxes of chopped up flesh. This flesh has varied from anything to cow, chicken, pig, sheep, horse, whale, buffalo, snake, human, sarkite, SCP-AXA, Ghoul, and possibly lots more. This has led to the theory that SCP-ALN was a major meat bank for a massive Sarkite Clan or even a union of clans, though which is unfortunately unknown. 

SCP-ALN was discovered in 1999 after the earthquakes ravaged the western section of the country of Turkey. Rescue and recovery teams went to the rubble across the destroyed areas to find and recover possible survivors. In one expedition in the city of [data expunged] they found SCP-ALN and unfortunately suffered casualties as a result. To make matters worse Group of Interest: Parawatch found images of what one of the expedition teams recorded and spread it online. Thankfully not only did Mobile Task Force Dionysus-1 “Fake News” manage to not only alter the evidence to make it look like an online creepypasta but notified the rest of the Foundation to investigate. 

A week later the Foundation Area was constructed above the ground of SCP-ALN, blocking off all further civilian interaction. The cover story is that they are inspecting the area to see if it can be constructed in the future. Unfortunately since its discovery several anomalous entities and items have been spotted or perhaps have manifested within SCP-ALN. Please see Addendum X-94 for details.

***

Addendum X-94

The following is a list of anomalous items and entities that exist within SCP-ALN as well as how they've been dealt with. 

ALN-214 “The Guardian” - A massive bipedal monster made entirely of flesh and possesses large teeth and a nearly indestructible body. Seems to be made of the same flesh as SCP-AXA and exists solely to guard the SCP-ALN from intruders. Has been left alone as Foundation Sarkite Pheromones trick it into thinking the staff are its new masters and thus never harms anyone. 

ALN-345 "The Messenger" - A crimson pig with glowing blue eyes and fleshy tendrils growing out of its back. Once appeared before an MTF unit who [Data Expunged by Order of the O5 Council]. Despite nothing notable happening afterward the O5 Council evoked Protocol "Butterfly Effect" and had the MTF unit killed. Their family and a few friends were later executed as well without explanation.

ALN-695 “The God Steak” - A seemingly normal piece of meat that actually tastes absolutely delicious, more delicious than any meat in the world. It even regenerates itself if ever eaten, cooked, or cut off. One could make as much as they want so long as they cut bits off of it every so often. However the steak is also filled with thousands of different Sarkite diseases either leading to a painful death or the host transforming into a Sarkic monster. Only Level 5 Administrative Staff are allowed to eat it as the augmentations and anomalous enhancements are able to prevent them from feeling the negative effects. Now rests as Site-AA in the Food and Ingredients Storage Unit. 

ALN-875 “The Red Mist Mimic” - an instance of SCP-AXA-4 that somehow has the anomalous ability to turn itself into a red mist. Claimed the lives of three researchers before MTF Ares-10 took it down with a Foundation flamethrower. 

***

.

SCP: Horror Movie Files Hub

[premierrestorationservices]

What Are the Key Factors to Look for in the Best Water Damage Restoration Services?

Water damage can occur very suddenly and be very destructive, causing structural problems, mould growth, and costly repairs if not taken care of right away and in the right way. The choice of the best water damage restoration service is essential for the mitigation of damage, protection of property, and ensuring a comprehensive recovery process. However, how do the best restoration companies stand out from the rest? Here, we outline the key factors you should consider when selecting a water damage restoration service.

Emergency Response and Availability Water damage often strikes without warning, making a quick response crucial to minimize destruction. The best water damage restoration services are available 24/7, ensuring they can respond to emergencies promptly. A rapid response time can prevent further damage, reduce repair costs, and save valuable items like furniture, electronics, and personal belongings. When evaluating a company, ask about their average response time and whether they have the capacity to dispatch a team immediately after a call. A service that prioritizes timely intervention demonstrates reliability and professionalism.

Certified and Trained Professionals The quality of the restoration job also depends largely on the professional abilities of technicians assigned to complete the job. Search for organizations employing certified and well-trained individuals to handle the work of restoring water damage. Any certification received, such as one from the Institute of Inspection, Cleaning, and Restoration Certification (IICRC), assures that their workers are conducting restoration work under professional standards.

Trained professionals can distinguish between three types of water damage: clean, gray, or black, and apply the suitable cleaning, drying, and disinfecting processes. They are ready to tackle the smallest event to the biggest disasters.

All-inclusive Services Restoration from water damage is much more than the process of water extraction. The good companies will always offer all-rounded services that would take care of every step involved in the process. These can include:

Water Extraction: Quick removal of standing water using advanced equipment such as pumps and vacuums. Drying and Dehumidification: Drying of affected areas to prevent mould growth and structural damage. Cleaning and Sanitizing: Disinfection of surfaces, carpets, and furniture to remove contaminants and odors. Structural Repairs: Repairs to walls, ceilings, flooring, and other structural elements damaged by water. Mould Remediation: Inspection and removal of mould growth to ensure a safe and healthy environment. Additionally, any water damage element should be covered within this process for an effective conclusion.

Latest Equipment and Technology Sophisticated apparatuses and instruments are necessary when performing water restoration work. Best companies invest the best technology because efficiency and greater satisfaction depend on equipment quality. Samples of necessary ones are:

•High-pumped pumps to vacuum out.

•High-power industrial-level dehumidifiers to dehydrate. •Air mover usage to facilitate air movement and enhance drying speed. •Infrared cameras for detection of water pockets that are inaccessible to naked eyes. •Moisture meters To measure and track moisture content

Technology is so advanced that it does not leave any kind of water behind that may cause further problems like mould formations.

Insurance Support The process of filing an insurance claim is overwhelming enough. However, the best water damage restoration services know this and can often help their customers manage the insurance process. They can do all or some of the following:

•Document the extent of the damage with photos and reports. •Work directly with insurance adjusters to make sure claims are processed in an effective and smooth manner. •Provide detailed estimates for restoration costs.

A restoration company that supports its clients in doing insurance claims could save you much hassle and time in getting your fair compensation.

Positive reviews and reputation Reputation means everything in business. In fact, while you are deciding between water damage restorations service providers, see to it that a company with high customer satisfaction will be considered in the shortlisting. Look out for online ratings and comments found on websites offering reviews, blogs, or any social media networking sites. Keep track of continuous feedback on punctuality, professionalism, communication, and quality work. The rating with testaments from more people in a company may give one reliable results.

Transparent Pricing and Detailed Estimates Additional stressors that can come with water damage include surprise costs. The Best Water Damage Restoration services offer transparent pricing and detailed estimates before starting work. This ensures you understand the scope of the project and can plan your budget accordingly. Avoid companies that are vague about costs or pressure you into agreeing to services without clear explanations. Transparency builds trust and reflects a company's commitment to ethical business practices.

Local Experience and Knowledge Knowledge of the local environment and building codes can play a crucial role in a company during restorative activities. Restoration services in an area are very likely to have exposure to certain local challenges, for example, flood patterns, weather-related water damage, or local construction materials. Second, local companies are more likely to have existing connections with local suppliers; therefore, this will make it easier to get materials and equipment.

Commitment to Safety Safety is the top consideration in water damage restoration. Only the best firms adhere to the highest safety standards to safeguard their workers as well as your premises. This ranges from the use of protective gear, strict adherence to industry safety standards, and proper disposal of contaminated materials. Safety measures are especially critical when dealing with black water damage, which contains harmful pathogens, or mould growth, which poses health risks.

Good Customer Service and Communication An excellent restoration company provides open communication and great customer service. The company should, starting from your initial inquiry until the job is complete, do the following:

•Be able to answer all your questions promptly. •Let you know the restoration process is moving along. •Give you an easy-to-understand explanation of what is being done. A company that cares about customers shows respect for your time and property.

Long-Term Solutions The best water damage restoration services look for long-term solutions, which means dealing with the root cause of water damage, such as fixing leaks or improving drainage systems, to avoid future problems. Long-term solutions save you money and reduce the likelihood of recurring problems.

Warranty and Guarantee The best restoration companies stand behind their work with warranties or guarantees. This gives people peace of mind, knowing the companies are committed to the quality of their services. A warranty is a demonstration of confidence in the service delivery and how effective and lasting the results are.

Conclusion Choosing the best water damage restoration service is a very important decision that can greatly affect the outcome of your property's recovery. Considering factors such as emergency response, certified professionals, advanced technology, and transparent pricing will lead you to a service that will be able to meet your needs and ensure a complete restoration. Don't forget to look for companies that are concerned with safety, customer satisfaction, and long-term solutions to protect your property and give you peace of mind during a difficult time.

[batchmasteruk]

ERP Software for Meat Processors: A Comprehensive Guide for UK Manufacturer

Meat manufacturing is one of the most complex industries in the food sector not just in the United Kingdom (UK) but globally. If meat is not handled properly, there is a higher risk of infection and diseases – making this industry one of the most sensitive and challenging segments amongst the other food verticals.  

Also, there are hiccups related to catch weight calculations, poultry management (in terms of feeding, hygiene, and wellness), perishability, and the complexities of assigning grades and cuts to meat products. Adding more are the health issues related to meat consumption, that often stem from the living conditions of the animals, and any negligence in the supply chain or storage can lead to contamination.  

This poses serious risks to consumer health and often raises red flags among regulators. Consequently, meat manufacturers are under constant pressure to comply with industry standards, while navigating intensifying competition, shrinking profit margins, delivering high-quality products, and managing the entire supply chain.    Not to forget, today's consumers are increasingly health-conscious and demand products that meet strict nutritional and safety standards. This puts additional pressure on manufacturers, who not only have to meet these expectations but also face the challenge of accurately conveying all the necessary information on labels and packaging.  But wait, there are more challenges in the basket, such as: 

Adhering to cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices) requirements 

Managing raw materials and their shelf life 

Ensuring worker safety and hygiene 

Managing fluctuating demand for products like beef and pork 

Ensuring traceability throughout the production cycle 

To effectively tackle these challenges, UK meat manufacturers are increasingly adopting ERP Software for Meat Processors. Meat Processing ERP software can streamline operations, ensure regulatory compliance, and uphold product quality across the production process. 

Why Meat Processing ERP is the pressing need for UK Meat Manufacturers 

A generic ERP system may fall short when it comes to meeting the unique demands of meat processors but ERP software for meat processors fit best, offering unique capabilities such as: 

Inventory Management: Efficiently tracks raw materials, ingredients, co-products, and by-products. It also enables the better organization of inventory using various classification methods such as LIFO, FIFO, and FEFO while maintaining optimal stock levels to prevent stock-outs or overstocking. 

Traceability: Monitors the entire journey of a product, from raw material intake to finished goods, ensuring complete traceability. It also helps meet product recall requirements with ease. 

Yield and Cost Management: Accurately measures yield, scales production, and tracks costs, enabling manufacturers to optimize profitability by aligning production with demand. 

Catch-Weight Functionality: Handles variable weights, ensuring that meat is priced accurately based on its exact weight, providing transparency and accuracy in pricing. 

Quality Control: Implements comprehensive quality checks to meet industry standards like HACCP and cGMP. It also enables detailed sample inspections to ensure product quality. 

Production: Streamlines the entire production process by optimizing production schedules, reducing downtime, helping monitor work-in-progress (WIP) inventory, tracking production output, and ensuring timely order fulfillment. 

Expiration Tracking: Reduces waste by closely monitoring expiration dates and providing timely alerts when products are approaching their expiry. 

Regulatory Compliance: Ensures compliance with industry-specific standards, including the Products Containing Meat (England) Regulations 2014, Food Information Regulations 2014, and the European Food Information to Consumers Regulation No 1169/2011 (FIC), helping avoid legal risks. 

One ERP solution that offers all above stated and more capabilities to the meat industry is BatchMaster ERP. More than just software, it’s a strategic competitive advantage tailored specifically for the unique needs of UK meat processors. It enables them to digitize and optimize their entire supply chain cycle while offering all the capabilities essential to meet Formulation, R&D, Processing, Quality, Compliance, Finance & Accounting, Inventory management, Planning and such needs. 

Benefits of Meat ERP Software  

Adopting a Meat ERP software offers several benefits to meat manufacturers, including: 

Enhanced accountability, predictability, and scalability along with consistent and assured quality products. 

Tight control over the costs and increased profit margin. 

Unparalleled command over the business processes such as inventory management, production & distribution. 

Improved efficiency as well as bottom line. 

Consistency in operations. 

Informed decision making. 

Ability to demonstrate regulatory compliance. 

Improved customer service that results in greater customer satisfaction. 

Competitive advantage. 

Discover how a ERP for food like BatchMaster can help you stay ahead of the curve, tackle industry challenges, and grow your business confidently. Click here to transform your operations today! 

[tameblog]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[ramestoryworld]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[alexha2210]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[angusstory]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[tumibaba]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[romaleen]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[monaleen101]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[iamownerofme]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[shelyold]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link

[iammeandmy]

Throughout the COVID-19 lockdown period of the pandemic, Chicago Public Schools (CPS), like many other districts, investigated and tested different solutions to help ensure building occupants felt comfortable enough that buildings were safe for occupancy. Initially, teams worked quickly to implement short-term strategies to address various concerns. That included partnering with third-party technical auditors to inspect ventilation equipment in all spaces, conducting air quality sampling within all schools, and establishing a greater emphasis on air quality control with facility field teams. Subsequently, CPS created standardized processes that are used today to proactively manage indoor air quality (IAQ) issues and keep CPS teams focused on figuring out the best solutions to continue operating effectively moving forward.   The first IAQ strategy implemented was creating an annual air quality sampling program to help the CPS environmental team identify potential IAQ issues. To do this, CPS partnered with three managing environmental contractors (MECs), each assigned to a region within the district. Annually, each MEC takes a sample of the air during occupancy in 25 percent of our rooms, does a 100-percent visual inspection of all rooms, and posts the results on the CPS website (www.cps.edu/AIRQuality).   If any sample readings are identified as above what would be acceptable, the MEC partners develop a scope of work for the CPS facilities teams to use to address the issues causing IAQ problems. The MEC partners then work with our facilities teams and any contractors we bring on board to rectify the problems, ensure that the repairs are handled properly, and not lead to any other environmental concerns within the building.   CPS's second strategy was to develop a quarterly preventative maintenance IAQ sampling check. This is where building engineers collect air quality data using handheld IAQ measuring devices. This portable air quality monitoring device measures PM2.5 and PM10 (both are types of particulate matter), CO2 concentrate, temperature, and humidity. Any readings that our onsite engineers capture as above acceptable levels are reported to the CPS environmental team, who then deploy the MEC to conduct site visits. They will investigate the situation further and develop a recommended scope of work to mitigate any issues found.   This strategy has proven to be a cost-effective way to capture air quality data more frequently. It is now a standard part of our preventative maintenance program.   The third strategy is currently in the pilot phase and is focused on using onsite IAQ sensor technology to collect real-time air quality data within our facilities. During the research phase, we reviewed possible device solutions for this pilot. Our teams looked at several different permanently mounted solutions that would meet multiple needs. We also sought help from IPVM, experts in physical security technology, which had a comparison study on the effectiveness of IAQ monitoring solutions.  We settled on a device based on the effectiveness of the sensors that we tested. These were compared against the IAQ testing tools our environmental contract partners use, as well as the technical requirements that we needed from an IT infrastructure perspective. Those requirements included:    It was understood from the beginning that CPS wanted a holistic technology solution that met CPS's technical requirements and provided the flexibility to integrate with multiple other technology devices that CPS was already managing. Most vendors selling the devices provided a SaaS (Software as a Service) dashboard. However, this was limited to hosting their own devices, restricting us from expanding this program to integrate our current suite of technology solutions. Based on our research and our need for flexibility, we ended up partnering with two vendors. One provided a product for combining BAS (Building Automation System) data and IAQ data dashboards. The second offered a platform for centralized aggregation of the IAQ views.  Today, the CPS IAQ remote monitoring pilot sensor solution is installed in 12 buildings, with 12 to 15 more slated for this capital year, depending on funding support from the budgeting team. This initiative represents a significant step forward in our commitment to ensuring the health and comfort of our building occupants. As the program has been rolling out the initial pilot sensors in these 12 buildings, facilities were chosen to represent a variety of design styles from our portfolio, including two administration facilities.   The technology and strategic set have provided our teams with the tools necessary to monitor and manage issues before complaints are provided proactively. Occupants in a few of the buildings have complained about the air quality over the years, and it was challenging to convince them that there were no risks or concerns — even with air sampling results from environmental consultants. Now that there is continuous data that can be shared with building occupants and leadership, it has proven to be a great tool to help create staff confidence in the current state of IAQ in these buildings.   As progress continues in this pilot program, there are considerations to add a few additional device manufacturers into the mix. When added to the BAS specifications, it will replace the traditional temperature/humidity/CO2 stats and allow for enhanced operating sequences. All-in-all, we are close to having a solid foundational systematic technology solution in place that will allow CPS to scale through the district as resources become available.   About the Authors/Program Owners  Rob Chistlieb — CPS Executive Director of Facilities Robert is the Executive Director of Facility Operations for Chicago Public Schools. As Executive Director, Rob oversees the district's facilities maintenance and environmental health and safety programs. Rob has been instrumental in creating the vision and leading his teams to develop and enhance IAQ and ecological programs. Under Rob’s leadership, Chicago Public Schools joined the Healthy Green Schools & Colleges program.  Richard Schleyer — CPS Director Richard is the Director of Environmental Health and Safety at Chicago Public Schools and oversees and manages all district environmental program standards and efforts. He and his team manage an extensive environmental health and safety program and have played a vital role in developing and managing the current IAQ programs.   Paul Valente — CPS Automation Architect Paul, the Automation Architect for Chicago Public Schools, oversees the district's management, upgrading, repair, and installation of all Building Automation Systems (BAS) and IoT systems. He plays a key role in coordinating specifications and consolidation efforts, focusing on integrating advanced technology to modernize the district’s controls and management systems.  Brian Martin — Deputy Program Director CPS PMO As Deputy Director of the Chicago Public Schools Project Management Office, Brian is vital in working with CPS teams to develop and manage the program governance and standards for Chicago Public Schools' facilities maintenance and capital renovation programs.  POSTED ON: 12/30/2024 Industry News & Trends Industry Training & Events Advice from the Field Insights & Updates Source link