#Scandza Forum

[interregnum-intermarium]

Growing a Forest in a World State: Ernst Jünger on Anarcho-Tyranny

Speech by Olena Semenyaka, international secretary of National Corps, at the Scandza Forum in Stockholm on March 30, 2019.

I am very grateful to Froði Midjord for inviting me to the annual Scandza Forum, which has become a true epicenter of the Scandinavian revival.

Addressing this year’s topic of the Forum, which is “Anarcho-Tyranny,” today, especially after an unbelievable detainment of Jared Taylor and barbaric campaign launched by Facebook in order to exclude even critical examination of nationalism from a public sphere, the decrease of freedom in Western societies is the main problem which is faced by everyone wishing to initiate some changes and even simply a discussion of the latter.

 Those on the Right, or Alt-Right taken broadly, often fairly consider an option of building their own networking community similar to the concept of a state within a state. In the context of new Facebook limitations, it would mean not only the creation of their own social networks (the path which has already been well-trodden by American Alt-Right) but also regular socializing, providing all kinds of assistance to each other, basically, building a paradoxical international tribe.

Such an approach, again, is natural and fair. But, to find the remedy in a long-term perspective, it’s important to determine the origins of the problem. To understand why operating within the global Western political system can be only temporary, it would be helpful to address the thought of the Third Way, the German interwar movement which has given the world names like Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, Oswald Spengler, Ernst and Friedrich Georg Jünger, Carl Schmitt, Armin Mohler and others. Having done that, we will realize that a much safer, or at least a parallel way, should consist in nothing but shaping the alternative world order. Which, again, does not cancel the entryist strategy of subverting the system from within.

Normies got used to the idea that horrors of total control are the legacy of totalitarian regimes only, whereas the brave new world born after WW2 is bad only in Huxley's and Orwell's books. The point of Ernst Jünger, who offered one of the earliest and most insightful descriptions of the coming totalitarian orders in his interwar classic treatise "The Worker. Domination and Gestalt" (1932), is that the difference between the two regimes which rivalled for the planetary domination in the 20th century and the post-war neo-liberal order, in fact, is not so striking. 

Back in the 30-s, Jünger had been observing the same developments not only in the Soviet Union and Germany but also in democratic France and Great Britain. He called this process "total mobilization" which is carried out by means of technology. And, Jünger went on to say, since the information component was growingly significant in modern wars, the states not only secretly engaged in race of arms but also had been enhancing the spheres which helped to make a society more homogeneous and uniform: sports, cinematograph, press, as a means of propaganda in particular. 

Jünger traced the origins of this process back to the Napoleonic wars, which for the first time dissoluted the borderline between the lacking military and the civilians. The declining warrior estate, the last bastion of aristocracy, eventually collapsed during the WW1 due to its groundbreakingly industrial character. The soldier behind the artillery battery no longer needs to be honorable, strong or clever. He needs to be professional, that's all. The very basis for heroism breaks down. Warriors turn into workers who often don't even have an experience of direct contact with the enemy. Jünger makes it clear that heroic realism is the only attitude which is worthy of cultivating under altered conditions, and precisely stoical acceptance of the latter is what makes such an attitude "heroic."

Jünger, who occupies a very special place among the theorists of philosophy of technology, heuristically associated the latter with the mythological forces of titanism. He and his brother Friedrich Georg described in detail what it means, and their mythological and poetic metaphors, in my opinion, have a huge descriptive and explanatory value.

In terms of Ernst Jünger's philosophy of culture, the titans, chthonic creatures, rebel against the gods, Olympians, by destroying the established borders between their creations, including Oswald Spengler's creatures (beings) of the higher type: cultural-civilizational types, let alone nations, nation states and races. The only difference between the interwar and the post-war spiritual-historical situation is that the advent of industrial orders bore the mark of titan Prometheus, homo faber, basically, the principle of productivity and a merciless rational warfare, whereas the post-industrial society loses heroic voluntarism of Prometheus (who, after all, remained on the side of the gods), because now the titans have a more powerful ally: Gaia, Mother Earth herself revolting against Heaven-Uranus. 

The invention of the lightening rod defending earth from heavenly fire in 1752, according to Jünger, was one of the starting points of this process. Today, Gaia covers herself with an ever denser network of cables, the true kingdom of titans producing their own fire and energies, which replaced earlier industrial gigantism. Along with the erosion of godly archetypes, species of animals and plants, flourishes genetic engineering challenging natural divine designs, as well as artificial insemination as the most obvious manifestation of the matriarchal orders’ expansion. All kinds of borders, limitations and inequality are treated with extreme irritation. Everything becomes fluid like early shape-changing sea-god Proteus, one of the enemies of Hercules, who sided with the gods against the chthonic creatures.

 Actually, we have already heard similar ideas in this or that form, for example, Julius Evola’s take on the “gynecocratic” society, but the important difference is that Jünger describes these tendencies in neutral objective terms, firstly, because the titans also have their legitimate place in the mythological structure of the universe and resonate with some aspects of a human psyche, secondly, these tendencies are not eternal. In this respect, Jünger, like Nietzsche, was a true visionary.

For the shipwreck of Titanic, in Jünger's interpretation, was another powerful sign sent by Cassandra indicating that the reign of the titans would also soon come to an end. At the same time, it is not a matter of sequential cycles of the divine and titanic rules. According to Jünger's forecast, the titans will reign throughout the entire 21th century, but then the gods will return, casting the titans in the Tartarus again, but also completing the eventual decline of the anthropocentric history which began with WW1 as the gates through which the titans entered the historical scene. Anti-individualistic, anti-human, misanthropic totalitarian orders, in Jünger's words, are a natural outcome of a much more global metaphysical dynamics: man's giving way to the titans on the historical arena.

However, early Jünger welcomed this process as the active-nihilistical phase of Friedrich Nietzsche's transvaluation of all values which must end with the birth of new values. Superman is the conqueror of God and nothing, says Nietzsche meaning that it is about creative ruination, but also giving a hint that Nothing may be an enemy much more terrific than the old order and values.

That's why early Jünger neutralized Marxist economical reductionism by reinterpreting the Worker not as a worker estate or a proletarian class but as a new human type which is as if engraved, as if imprinted in the human material by the metaphysical and, should be added, titanical Gestalt of the Worker. The new human type assumes the features of technology: activity, dynamism, impersonality and a passion for uniform ways of behaviour. Jünger calls it the principle of work carefully distinguishing it from the moral Biblical merits of hard labours. And he welcomes the new human type replacing the "touching child of the bourgeois sentimentality," the individual. In this context, Jünger also attacks the freedom of speech and fake artistic expression.

Simultaneously, the new human type is not so much totalitarian as “superhuman”: according to Jünger, this is the new aristocracy born in the trenches of WW1. Anyway, we easily recognize the polemic with “I accuse,” Emil Zola's letter to the president of French Republic in defense of Alfred Dreyfus, Jewish officer who was charged with state treason and was also condemned by the patriotic public. Since then, criticism of the state, bureaucracy and official media from a civic point of view has been associated exclusively with the Left.

 However, having received a ban on publishing in the British occupation zone right after the end of WW2 and, overall, experiencing total control in the post-war FRG, Jünger, soon enough, developed his own extremely influential third positionist criticism of the police state. Following his friend Carl Schmitt, he labeled the neo-totalitarian political system “Leviathan” and started summoning gods back. Shortly afterwards, Jünger was reintegrated into the post-war German society as a writer, participated in the German-French reconciliation ceremony in 1984 alongside German chancellor Helmut Kohl and French president Francois Mitterand and, eventually, has become a true cultural icon in Germany and beyond, but his criticism has remained unchanged.

 As opposed to the interwar emphasis on the new human type, Jünger started stressing individual strategies of resisting Leviathan. Jünger documents this change of perspective in works like "Across the Line" (1950), "The Forest Passage" (1951), as well as later collection of aphorisms named "Author and Authorship" (1984). As opposed to his early attack on fake political and artistic freedom, this time, Jünger places poets and artists among other figures hated by the tyrants: the followers of religious and metaphysical teachings who don't fear death but whom the tyrants fear, friends and lovers who do not let Leviathan dissolute the personal in the public. Almost liberal ideas, as far as we see, but they are well-familiar to us in the context of discussing the model of a state within a state, the oasis in the desert of post-war nihilism, as Jünger defines this space of personal freedom. For the elephant skin of the titans still suffers from artistic stings of the muses, Jünger adds.

 To sum up, Jünger suggests the models of a sovereign individual, first Waldgänger (the Forest Fleer), then the Anarch as the advanced version of the latter. The metaphor of the Forest and hidden forest paths leading to freedom becomes crucial for the post-war Third Way, especially in Jünger’s and Heidegger’s work. Many recognize here a reference to Tacitus’ “Germania,” and Jünger himself referred to the old Icelandic right to retreat into the forest for those who were proclaimed outlaws. In many respects, these models are as polemical with regard to the liberal (bourgeois) concept of freedom as the new human type exemplified in the Warrior and the Worker. But, as opposed to the latter, the Forest Fleer and the Anarch target not the old discredited order but Nothing itself, Nothing that not so much replaced it in all its outright omnipresence as found its way into the very heart of the new post-war order, seemingly humanist and freedom-loving.

Actually, already in 1949 futuristic dystopian novel “Heliopolis” Jünger showed that technological development wouldn't bring liberation and equality. He illustrates it in the episode about the device named phonophor, an analogue of modern smartphones with an access to the Internet, which unveiled the old deception of indirect democracy. Although all residents of Heliopolis could participate daily in internet plebiscites and questionnaires, answer “yes,” “no,” “abstain,” the right to pose questions for voting, as always, belonged to the few. Today, in the epoch of audio-visual technologies, the dystopian aspect of technology in the service of a particular political agenda consists in the filtered informational, especially online, exchange with a society: anytime, a political opponent can be announced an “extremist” and deprived of such access.

The Orwellian genre of the futuristic dystopian novel has become very symptomatic for late Jünger. 1977 novel “Eumeswil,” which is a sequel to “Heliopolis,” is a key parody of the modern society in which Jünger, conceptually, continues developing the main theme of “The Forest Passage”: liberalism has nothing to do with freedom. The main difference between the two models of a sovereign individual described in these works is that the society expelled the Forest Fleer, whereas the Anarch expelled the society from himself; as famous Jünger’s formula says, the Anarch is to the anarchist, what the monarch is to the monarchist.

A protagonist of the Anarch in the novel, historian Martin “Manuel” Venator, is also employed as a night steward at the Casbah, a fortress of Condor, the tyrant ruling over the futuristic city state Eumeswil somewhere in North Africa. As a sovereign individual, he is no enthusiastic supporter of Condor and, theoretically, could even assassinate him, but the self-stylized Anarch is even more distanced from the “opposition” in the person of advocates of what he believes to be fake freedom: anarchists “raging until they are thrust into a more rigorous straitjacket,” liberals, demagogic socialists imagining themselves the followers of Brutus. As opposed to them, the Anarch rejects not the state and power structures as such; he rejects the very foundations of the contemporary society, because, as a historian, he knows “what can be offered” (“I am an anarch – not because I despise authority, but because I need it”).

Interestingly enough, in tune with late Jünger’s frequent motif of “The Great Transition,” “Eumeswil” ends with the Great Hunt in the jungle in which participate both the narrator, Martin Venator (meaning “hunter”), and tyrant Condor. Nobody returns from this highly metaphorical “Forest Passage,” and this final conjunction of the Anarch and the tyrant, just like Jünger’s conscious collision of freedom vs. “freedom,” functions as a positive counterpart of today’s anarcho-tyranny.

In other words, the Anarch rejects only the regime of anarcho-tyranny comprised of delusional freedom and no less fake and illegitimate authorities. And we, third positionists, in no way attack freedom while attacking neo-liberalism: we attack neo-totalitarian despotism of quasi-Eastern type which currently reigns in the old West maniacally hunting thought crimes of the dissidents.

 Actually, it was Oswald Spengler who for the first time clarified that the late phase of the European cultural and civilizational type, the Faustian phase, is indifferent to arts, poetry and, overall, culture. It cares about science, technology, industry, construction (not architecture as such), spatial expansion and quantitative growth in general. Spengler called it the late civilizational phase when the culture's creativity is already exhausted. Jünger reinterpreted it as the contrast between the divine and titanic reigns. Similar ideas may be found in the creativity of Rene Guenon, the founder of integral traditionalism, “The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times” (1945) in particular. When the cannons sing, muses are silent, reiterated back in the days Nietzsche.

 That's why, on a global scale, as pompous and surreal as it may sound, we will feel a relief only when we hasten the coming of a new metahistorical aeon. When the gods return, culture, intelligence and argumentation become important again. Yet, the very idea of expansion and voluntaristic hastening of higher cycles is titanic, Promethean, and that is also why I refer to Jünger's principled belief that man should be friends both with the gods and the titans, for he has elements of both of them.

The main lesson drawn by Jünger from WW2 was that the new orders did not bring new values and can easily coexist with nihilism. However, the reverse is also true: the Forest can grow bigger from any point of the existing titanic infrastructure, for, as Jünger persuasively shown, it is not “evil,” it’s neutral. Technology, as a mythical power, of course, is neutral not in a sense of being a mere instrument of progress and equal distribution of material goods. Experience of two world wars says that technology, above all, is a destructive, levelling power. Still, it can work both ways, for Leviathan and for the Forest, for the global state and for the rebel who does not need the mediation of the latter while addressing the society. That’s why the global political system fears popular metapolitical video bloggers so much: they defeat the modern world with its own weapons.

As Carl Schmitt observed, modern Partisan, thanks to new technological means, becomes mobile and rootless, which makes him especially dangerous for the system. Schmitt provided probably the deepest philosophical-political account of anarcho-tyranny: the global police state which denies the normal notion of the enemy, and, having demonized all opponents as enemies of humanity as such (not some contingent and particular regime like the modern Western political system), legitimizes its neo-totalitarian oppression through repeated counter-terror operations against all disagreeing. Today it happens, above all, by importing representatives of incompatible cultural values into Western societies and criminalizing the popular frustration. But certain geopolitical alternative, inspired by the modernity itself, will make the system armless.

Not incidentally, Jünger, during his stay in Paris as part of the German occupation administration, wrote a secret treatise “Peace” in which he suggested a model of the United States of Europe. Learning from Trotskyist internationals, Jünger called to develop universalism from the Right instead of reactionary, and futile, resistance to this world-historical tendency. Today, when I say that the model of a state in a state is insufficient or, more precisely, intermediate, and refer to paneuropean geopolitical doctrines and a planetary geostrategy, I mean creation of the infrastructure for the universalism from the Right within which we will be able to expand (“titanically”) without compromising our values (the “divine”).

Fear of the system when it saw that networking of Alt-Right brought Donald Trump to power was enormous, although he’s a part of it. However, shutting down the public space for too many dissidents will cost too much for the system. We have to strongly "inject freedom" in the information space, in the artistic sphere as well, instead of letting it associate us with real terror acts, which, also after the 11th of September and Iraq, are used only for imposing more control on the individual, even apolitical. It does not mean that we cannot show teeth: there is enough crime, violence and injustice in the world entitling us, especially in Eastern Europe, to self-organize and claim first civic, then political, and, finally, geopolitical power to ourselves.

But the main battle lies in the individual’s relation to technology as both an alienating and a bonding power, both an instrument of dystopian totalitarian control or propaganda and an emancipating energy that does not recognize any limitations, intimately reaching people’s minds and souls like modern music and cinematograph.

 In this respect, the situations in Western and Eastern European parts of the world are equal. We have to make a careful mapping of the public space to mark the territories in which the Forest can sprout out as the mythical vines of Dionysus. Illuminating social interaction, true art, liberating metaphysical teachings and practices, combined with our own geoeconomical projects, will bring down the regime of anarcho-tyranny in the blink of an eye.

[monokulttuuri]

The Scandza Forum: Copenhagen 15.9.2018 Part 2/2

The Scandza Forum: Copenhagen 15.9.2018 Part 2/2

The Scandza Forum: Copenhagen 15.9.2018 Part 2/2

Lähde – https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xssei-SQN8U/

Monokulttuuri FM – lähetykset BitChute kanavalta: https://www.bitchute.com/monokulttuuri

[lesbiskammerat]

Alle på gaden! Lørdag den 12. oktober samles nationalister, nynazister og andre strømninger fra det alleryderste højre, når Scandza Forum for anden gang afholdes i København.

Men det bliver ikke uden modstand! Vi mødes derfor i Folkets Park den 12. oktober klokken 10:00, hvor vi sammen tager hen til Scandza Forum og gør det så svært som muligt for dem. Vær mobile, snør løbeskoene eller kom og råb. Der vil både være en samlet demonstration eller mulighed for at yde modstand på andre kreative måder. Sammen stopper vi fascisterne!

Selvom Scandza forsøger at undgå offentlig opmærksomhed, lykkes de med at samle et bredt spektrum af den udenomsparlamentariske højrefløj. Alt fra alt-right og Youtube-fænomenet The Golden One over Rasmus Paludan til erklærede nationalsocialister og antisemitter deltager. Der forventes primært deltagere fra Skandinavien til konferencen, men også talere og topfigurer fra USA.

Scandzas adresse holdes hemmeligt for deltagerne indtil sidste øjeblik for at undgå protester fra moddemonstranter. Men det stopper os ikke fra at finde dem!

- Revolutionære Antifascister, Antifascistisk Aktion & Antifascistiske Unge

[antifainternational]

November 30, København - Gigs with attitude #1

Gigs With Attitude is a concept for concerts with emphasis on the political! We will support an antifascist cause with each show that we make. There will be boxes that you can donate money to in the bar and in the entrance. The profits from our delicious drinks bar will also be granted. The first cause we will support is our comrades in Oslo, who are facing fines of up to 300.000 NOK for protesting against the nazi-conference 'Scandza Forum' in Sinsen. ► Meatfist (Københavns bedste Misfits cover band) ► Dårligt Selskab (kbh, Politisk Punk Rock) https://www.facebook.com/daarligtselskab/ ► Motörize (kbh, Motörhead-jam) https://www.facebook.com/MotorizerCopenhagen/ ► DJ Jack Attack & Isbryderen More to be announced! Doors: 21.00 Entrance: 60 kr ---------------------- NO: SEXISM, RACISM, HOMOPHOBIA/HETEROSEXISM, VIOLENCE OR HARD DRUGS!

[rtrixie]

Next scandza forum is going to have Jared Taylor debating E Michael Jones. This might actually be worth watching

[mohamed86a]

Om Dag Sørås, podcast og antirasisme

Men hvorfor vil du ikke gå på podcasten og ha en fin og konstruktiv dialog? Hvorfor ikke akseptere invitasjonen? 

Her om dagen leste jeg et intervju i Minerva hvor komikeren Dag Sørås sier at folk som reagerte på den rasistiske ranten til Tore Sagen er "kronisk lettkrenkede" som ikke forstår intensjon og kontekst. Han bruker SV-politiker Marian Hussein og en tweet hun kom med som eksempel og kårer Hussein for å være vinneren av “flauhetskonkurranse” (kommer tilbake til flauhet og slikt senere i innlegget mitt). Sørås er i det intervjuet og i et annet i VG krenket på vegne av Sagen og Radioresepsjonen. Man kan si og dermed avfeie dette her som bare et kollegialt forsvar - men det er mer enn det. Dette er også et dårlig forsøk på å stilne kritikken av en statskanal. 

Så går jeg til Twitter og spør: Hvem er Dag Sørås? Langt ute på kvelden får jeg en invitasjon til å delta på Sørås podcast. Før vi går videre så må vi først snakke om en uting: Denne greia hvor man inviterer folk på kaffe, til sin podcast og you name whatever - ikke fordi man er genuint interessert i å diskutere tematikken men fordi man har et helt annet premiss: Vedkommende er lettkrenket, “humørløse”, forstår ikke noe osv - så møt meg ansikt-til-ansikt. Dette er en hersketeknikk og ikke en fin gest for å skape bedre dialog og meningsbrytning. 

Med andre ord: Invitasjonen til en podcast i etterkant av ikke noe jeg har skrevet om rasisme (på mange forskjellige steder Morgenbladet, Dagsavisen, Klassekampen, Vinduet osv) eller sagt tidligere om (til og med i en rekke podkaster som Minervas, Morgenbladets og Podcast om Rus). Men en invitasjon som kommer fra en som mener det er “lettkrenket” å reagere på at en mann som får 1,4 mill. i lønn fra statskanalen skal produsere rasistisk innhold. Dette var ikke en invitasjon til å diskutere rasisme i Norge anno 2019 - i all dets omfang og forskjellige manifestasjoner. Det var en hersketeknikk. 

Hva er i grunn flaut? Og hva er denne flauhetskonkurransen som Dag Sørås, Radioresepsjonen og andre snakker om? Jo, hvis man tror antirasisme handler om å gjøre rasister "flaue" (eller vise at rasisme er først og fremst noe flaut) så har man ikke forstått hva antirasisme er eller hva rasisme er. Hvis dette er antirasisme - så vil jeg si at du er ikke så kreativ som komiker - men at du har også som en antirasist misforstått hva dette handler om. Hvis det å komme med rasistisk rant i det hele tatt kan regnes som antirasisme (det er det ikke - men dette har vært vanlig forsvar av Tore Sagens rant blant noen i offentligheten - så jeg aksepterer det premisset i et øyeblikk).

Tilbake til de som Sørås og andre mener er “kronisk lettkrenket”. Marian Hussein er en av de politikere i Norge som har gjort sitt ytterste for å sette rasisme på dagsorden. Først i bypolitikken i Oslo og senere på Tinget hvor hun blant annet har foreslått en handlingsplan mot muslimhat/islamofobi. Marian har snakket om rasisme, opplevd rasisme, har erfaringer med det. Hun har forfattet vedtak, politiske resolusjoner og bidratt til partiprogrammer om hvordan man skal jobbe mot rasisme i Norge i vår tid. Marian har gått på demonstrasjoner mot rasister og nazister, holdt workshop om rasisme, inviterte minoritetsungdom til samtaler og tatt deres bekymring om rasisme på alvor. Hun har brukt mye politiske kapital på å løfte dette opp på nasjonal dagsorden. Det vil si både den klassebaserte rasismen, men også hatkriminaliteten, islamofobien og hverdagsrasismen.

Når jeg, Marian eller andre og legg merke til hvilke komikere (Zane Khan, Jonna Støme og flere) som reagerte kritisk til Sagen og Radioresepsjonen de har samtlige minoritetsbakgrunn. Når vi reagerer mot at en statskanal som i sine egne ordlister blant annet skriver at man ikke skal bruke ordet "neger". Når vi reagerer mot at den samme statskanalen og dets såkalte humorprogrammer produserer negervitser og jødevitser (jødesvin) i 2019 så er det fordi vi forstår at en statskanal i et flerkulturelt samfunn er ment for alle. NRKs samfunnsoppdrag (NRK-plakaten) er å opplyse - ikke produsere rasistiske og antisemittiske innhold. Vi reagerer ikke fordi vi er lettkrenkende, humørløse eller ikke forstår satire/komedie.  Men fordi en statskanal og dets produksjoner fortjener kritikk. Og viktigst av alt: NRK tilhører oss alle.

Jeg skal ikke bruke så mye tid på Radioresepsjonen. Men jeg må nevne noe annet avslutningsvis: Rasisme er for nordmenn som meg, Marian og de komikere som kritiserte Radioresepsjonen ikke først og fremst noe "flaut" - men noe destruktivt. Det rammer våre kropper - det begrenser vårt ytringsrom, det begrenser vår bevegelsesfrihet - det diskriminerer oss ut av arbeidsmarkedet, boligmarkedet og utelivet. Og verste av alt: Det dreper. Det drepte Arve, Benjamin, Johanne og m.fl. 

Jeg vil ikke at du skal finne rasisme som noe "flaut" - noe sagt av din Resett-lesende onkel - men noe destruktivt. Noe som rammer dine medborgere. Ikke finn det flaut - reager aktivt mot det. Ikke vær passiv - ikke reprodusere det. Reager aktivt mot det - særlig når du er i den posisjonen som du er i: En komiker med gedigen plattform og millionlønn. Du trenger ikke å gå ut i gata som mange unge mennesker gjorde i går. De samme unge menneskene som ble anholdt av Oslo-politiet mens nazister i et nabolag i Oslo i 2019 preket om etnisk rensing. I samme nabolaget hvor en mørkhudet foreldre spurte en venninne av meg som er motdemonstrant om det er trygt for hennes barn å bevege seg ut siden nazistene og Breivik-tilhengere (Scandza Forum) har leid lokaler i deres nabolag? Men gjør noe aktivt. Å rante rasistisk i 2019 er ikke det du burde gjøre eller det mest konstruktive. Det er ikke antirasisme - men latskap. Det var aldri antirasistisk å reprodusere rasisme. Det ordet har mange av oss nordmenn opplevd på kroppen så lenge vi har levd. Vi trenger ikke å høre på det når vi skrur på statskanalen. 

Så jeg kommer gjerne på din podcast, Dag Sørås. Men ikke på det premisset om at noen er lettkrenkede fordi de kritiserer et program produsert på en statskanal. Fordi det er ikke bare berettiga kritikk - men også nødvendig å gjøre.

[motgift]

Kevin MacDonald gästade Sverige

Kevin MacDonald gästade Sverige när Scandza Forum höll sin första konferens

Lördagen den 20 maj arrangerade Scandza Forum sin första konferens. Scandza Forum har startat med inspiration från den brittiska konferensarrangören London Forum som i flera år framgångsrikt arrangerat konferenser och föreläsningar med en lång rad intressanta föreläsare från skilda miljöer.

I och med konferensen som ägde rum i Stockholm öppnade också Scandza Forum upp portarna för sin…

[gambit-goat]

Scandza Forum Stockholm, 2018 - Jared Taylor

[interregnum-intermarium]

Scandza Forum Highlights (Stockholm, March 30)

Fróði Midjord (also reciting the speech by Jared Taylor), Marcus Follin (The Golden One), Greg Johnson, Millennial Woes, Mark Collett and Olena Semenyaka. Video of the speech by The Golden One: 

Video of the speech by Greg Johnson: 

Text of the speech by Olena Semenyaka: https://interregnum-intermarium.tumblr.com/post/184204005299/growing-a-forest-in-a-world-state-ernst-j%C3%BCnger-on

[monokulttuuri]

The Scandza Forum: Copenhagen 15.9.2018 Part 1/2

The Scandza Forum: Copenhagen 15.9.2018 Part 1/2

The Scandza Forum: Copenhagen 15.9.2018 Part 1/2

Lähde – https://www.bitchute.com/video/afe-BDAYpoU/

Monokulttuuri FM – lähetykset BitChute kanavalta: https://www.bitchute.com/monokulttuuri

[theamericanfreedomparty]

Jared Taylor Has Been Banned From Europe

Jared Taylor Has Been Banned From Europe

Letter From Zurich:

I have been banned from Europe and will be deported tomorrow.

March 29, 2019, Zurich

Dear Friends in Stockholm, Turku, and around the world,

I am sorry to have to tell you that I cannot attend the Scandza Forum in Stockholm or the Awakening Conference in Turku, Finland, where I had been invited to give talks. Today, when I landed in Zurich for a connecting flight to Stockholm,…

[antifainternational]

October 12, København - Alle på gaden! Stop nazikonferencen!

Alle på gaden! Lørdag den 12. oktober samles nationalister, nynazister og andre strømninger fra det alleryderste højre, når Scandza Forum for anden gang afholdes i København. Men det bliver ikke uden modstand! Vi mødes derfor i Folkets Park den 12. oktober klokken 10:00, hvor vi sammen tager hen til Scandza Forum og gør det så svært som muligt for dem. Vær mobile, snør løbeskoene eller kom og råb. Der vil både være en samlet demonstration eller mulighed for at yde modstand på andre kreative måder. Sammen stopper vi fascisterne! Selvom Scandza forsøger at undgå offentlig opmærksomhed, lykkes de med at samle et bredt spektrum af den udenomsparlamentariske højrefløj. Alt fra alt-right og Youtube-fænomenet The Golden One over Rasmus Paludan til erklærede nationalsocialister og antisemitter deltager. Der forventes primært deltagere fra Skandinavien til konferencen, men også talere og topfigurer fra USA. Scandzas adresse holdes hemmeligt for deltagerne indtil sidste øjeblik for at undgå protester fra moddemonstranter. Men det stopper os ikke fra at finde dem!

[americanfreedomparty]

Jared Taylor Has Been Banned From Europe

Jared Taylor Has Been Banned From Europe

Letter From Zurich:

I have been banned from Europe and will be deported tomorrow.

March 29, 2019, Zurich

Dear Friends in Stockholm, Turku, and around the world,

I am sorry to have to tell you that I cannot attend the Scandza Forum in Stockholm or the Awakening Conference in Turku, Finland, where I had been invited to give talks. Today, when I landed in Zurich for a connecting flight to Stockholm,…

[interregnum-intermarium]

A welcoming speech by Olena Semenyaka at Pact of Steel III conference

I welcome everyone at the 3rd edition of the annual Pact of Steel conference on behalf of the paneuropean Reconquista movement, Militant Zone and Plomin Club. This conference cycle is timed to Winter Solstice and *a special kind of* Black Metal Asgardsrei festival, already 7th.

It is no surprise that we gather here today before the musical part, because it has never been a purely musical event, just like the very genre of BM, in its original form, is above "only music."

Initially, this Pact of Steel between Eastern and Western Europe was "signed" in Russia. However, the increasing oppression of Russian nationalism by Putin's regime soon closed this opportunity. The rebirth of Asgardsrei festival happened in the post-revolutionary Ukraine, for the first time in 2015. Since then, it outgrew its initial format: this year, it will be a 2-day festival, in fact 3-day, and we needed a much bigger venue than last year.

Yet, united against the common enemy, quasi-Soviet Putin's Russia, Ukrainian, Russian and Belorussian nationalists gave birth to something bigger: the program of the Great European Reconquista. In 2016, it transformed into the geopolitical program of Intermarium, the union of Central and Eastern European countries, as a platform for the alternative European integration the endgoal of which is the Paneuropean confederation of sovereign nations, or simply Paneuropa. The first Paneuropa conference took place in Kyiv in 2017.

This event would never be possible without the feat of Ukrainian nationalists, their comrades from Russia, Belarus and other Eastern and Western European countries who laid down their lives not only for the independence of Ukraine, but, above all, for the rebirth of the West. This is our duty now to make sure that their sacrifice was not in vain.

Last year, Pact of Steel conference bore the title "After the Darkest European Hour." For we believe that after the darkest and longest European night, Kali-Yuga, Iron Age, there will inevitably be a new dawn. And the natural cycles, the day of Winter Solstice in particular, to which the current conference cycle is timed, promise us this eternal reccurrence.

But not only this. The Heathen worldview itself shows the way to our spiritual homeland out of the emptiness of European nihilism brought by secularized desert religions. European genetic code and Heathenism is represented in its purest archetypal form precisely in the Nordic countries, and today we are lucky to welcome here Frodi Midjord from The Faroe Islands, the founder of Scandza Forum, which lays a special emphasis on the nordic identity, and the host of "Guide to Kulchur" podcast. He will talk about the metaphysical foundations of European Heathenism, referring to Martin Heidegger's fundamental ontology in particular.

Afterwards, we will listen to Hendrik Möbus who'll have a rehearsal right after his speech along with legendary Absurd band that will headline Asgardsrei VII festival. We are extremely proud that Asgardrei festival was one of the reasons that inspired him to "return" to the public space and appear today here with the lecture about the White God of War, Roman von Ungern-Sternberg. The sun of Europe rises in the East, and this symbolical for the Reconquista Movement figure may be considered as the Wild Hunt incarnate.

[interregnum-intermarium]

Pact of Steel III | Сталевий Пакт ІІІ | Стальной Пакт III (FULL VIDEO)

Dec. 14, 2018, for the third time in a row, pre-ASGARDSREI festival PACT OF STEEL conference, which is annually held under the auspices of the paneuropean Reconquista Movement, Plomin Club and Militant Zone, took place in Kyiv. Symbolically, this time it happened at the well-known Reconquista Club. 

Regular attendees of the conference remember that this cycle of events encompasses two main thematic blocs: Metapolitics | Counter-Culture and European Reconquista. 

Within the 3rd edition of PACT OF STEEL conference, "Metapolitics and Counter-Culture" and "European Reconquista" blocs were disclosed by Fróði Midjord (The Faroe Islands) and Hendrik Möbus (Germany) respectively. 

A welcoming speech by Olena Semenyaka (coordinator of the paneuropean Reconquista Movement, Ukraine) 0:00 - 7:49  Fróði Midjord (founder of the Scandza Forum, host of the "Guide to Kulchur" podcast, The Faroe Islands) "Nordic Paganism as Metaphysics" 7:50 - 53:35

Hendrik Möbus (frontman of ABSURD Band, publicist, Germany) "The White God of War: Baron Roman von Ungern-Sternberg" 59:29 - 2:15:15