#Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market application | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

aimarketresearch · 19 days ago

Text

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market Size, Share, Trends, Growth Opportunities and Competitive Outlook

Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market - Size, Share, Demand, Industry Trends and Opportunities

Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market, By Component (Solution, Services), Deployment Mode (On-Premise, Cloud-Based), Organization Size (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Large Enterprises), End User (Banking, Financial Services and Insurance, Government and Defense, IT and Telecommunications, Energy and Utilities, Manufacturing, Retail, Healthcare, Others), Country (U.S., Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America, Germany, Italy, U.K., France, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, Turkey, Russia, Rest of Europe, Japan, China, India, South Korea, Australia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa) Industry Trends

Access Full 350 Pages PDF Report @

**Segments**

- **Component:** The SAML authentication market can be segmented based on components into software and services. The software segment includes various solutions offered by providers for implementing SAML authentication protocols, while the services segment encompasses professional services like consulting, training, and support.

- **Deployment Type:** Another important segmentation is based on deployment types, which can include on-premises and cloud-based deployment models. Organizations can choose the deployment type that best suits their infrastructure and security requirements.

- **Organization Size:** The market can also be segmented by organization size, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. The varying needs and resources of different organization sizes can drive the adoption of SAML authentication solutions.

- **Industry Vertical:** Moreover, the SAML authentication market can be segmented by industry verticals such as healthcare, BFSI, IT & telecom, government, retail, and others. Different sectors have specific security and compliance requirements, leading to tailored SAML authentication solutions for each vertical.

**Market Players**

- **OneLogin:** OneLogin is a key player in the SAML authentication market, offering a comprehensive identity management platform that includes SAML SSO capabilities. The company's solutions cater to a wide range of industries and organization sizes, ensuring secure and seamless authentication experiences.

- **Ping Identity:** Ping Identity is another prominent player known for its robust SAML authentication solutions. The company provides identity-centric security solutions that help organizations protect their digital assets and enable secure access management through SAML protocols.

- **ForgeRock:** ForgeRock offers a modern identity and access management platform that supports SAML authentication for secure single sign-on across applications. The company's solutions focus on delivering seamless user experiences while ensuring strong security protocols to mitigate cyber threats.

- **Microsoft Corporation:** Microsoft Corporation provides SAML authentication capabilities through its Azure Active Directory service, enabling organizations to implement federated identity management for cloud applications. The company's SAML-based solutions integrate seamlessly with various Microsoft products and services.

The SAML authentication market is witnessing significant growth and evolution driven by the increasing emphasis on data security and identity management across various industries. The segmentation of the market based on components, deployment types, organization sizes, and industry verticals allows for a more targeted approach in addressing the diverse needs and requirements of organizations. The component segmentation into software and services provides organizations with a range of options to choose from based on their specific authentication and security needs. Software solutions offered by market players like OneLogin, Ping Identity, ForgeRock, and Microsoft Corporation enable organizations to implement SAML protocols effectively for secure and seamless authentication processes. On the other hand, the services segment offers professional support for implementation, training, and maintenance, ensuring smooth integration of SAML authentication solutions within existing systems.

The segmentation based on deployment types, including on-premises and cloud-based models, reflects the growing trend towards cloud adoption and the need for flexible and scalable authentication solutions. Organizations can opt for on-premises deployments for greater control and customization or choose cloud-based solutions for enhanced accessibility and cost-efficiency. The choice of deployment type often aligns with the organization's infrastructure, security policies, and IT capabilities, influencing the selection of SAML authentication providers that offer compatible deployment options. Market players like Ping Identity and ForgeRock cater to both deployment types, providing organizations with the flexibility to choose the most suitable option based on their preferences and requirements.

The segmentation by organization size further enhances the market analysis by recognizing the unique challenges and priorities of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) compared to large enterprises. SMEs may prioritize cost-effectiveness and ease of implementation, leading them to opt for SAML authentication solutions that offer quick deployment and minimal maintenance. In contrast, large enterprises with complex IT environments and diverse user bases may require more advanced and scalable solutions from providers such as Microsoft Corporation, known for its robust identity management offerings. Understanding the distinct needs of different organization sizes helps market players tailor their solutions and services to cater to a broader customer base**Segments**

**Market Players**

Highlights of TOC:

Chapter 1: Market overview

Chapter 2: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Chapter 3: Regional analysis of the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market industry

Chapter 4: Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market segmentation based on types and applications

Chapter 5: Revenue analysis based on types and applications

Chapter 6: Market share

Chapter 7: Competitive Landscape

Chapter 8: Drivers, Restraints, Challenges, and Opportunities

Chapter 9: Gross Margin and Price Analysis

Key Questions Answered with this Study

1) What makes Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market feasible for long term investment?

2) Know value chain areas where players can create value?

3) Teritorry that may see steep rise in CAGR & Y-O-Y growth?

4) What geographic region would have better demand for product/services?

5) What opportunity emerging territory would offer to established and new entrants in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

6) Risk side analysis connected with service providers?

7) How influencing factors driving the demand of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication in next few years?

8) What is the impact analysis of various factors in the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market growth?

9) What strategies of big players help them acquire share in mature market?

10) How Technology and Customer-Centric Innovation is bringing big Change in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

Browse Trending Reports:

Empagliflozin, Dapagliflozin and Canagliflozin Market Catalyst Carriers Market Brachytherapy Isotopes Market Diuretic Drugs Market Carbon Fiber Tape Market Automotive Variable Oil Pump Market Excipients Market ALAD Porphyria Treatment Market Cup Carriers Market Kumquat Extracts Market Blind Loop Syndrome Market Insulin Delivery Devices Market

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavors to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 614 591 3140

UK: +44 845 154 9652

APAC : +653 1251 975

Email: [email protected]

#market analysis #market share #market trends

0 notes

harshnews · 8 months ago

Text

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market Size, Share, Trends, Growth and Competitive Outlook

"Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market – Industry Trends and Forecast to 2028

Access Full 350 Pages PDF Report @

**Segments**

- **Component**: The component segment of the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication market includes software and services. The software sub-segment is expected to dominate the market due to the increasing demand for SAML authentication solutions to secure digital identities and transactions. On the other hand, the services sub-segment is anticipated to witness significant growth as organizations seek professional assistance for the implementation and management of SAML authentication solutions.

- **Deployment Mode**: The deployment mode segment is categorized into cloud and on-premises. The cloud segment is projected to experience rapid growth as more businesses opt for cloud-based SAML authentication solutions to enhance scalability and flexibility. However, the on-premises segment is expected to hold a considerable market share, particularly among enterprises that prioritize data privacy and security.

- **Organization Size**: The organization size segment covers small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. The large enterprises sub-segment is likely to lead the market as these organizations have the resources to invest in robust SAML authentication solutions for comprehensive security measures. Conversely, the SMEs sub-segment is expected to witness significant growth with the rising awareness about the importance of data protection across all business sizes.

**Market Players**

- **OneLogin, Inc.**: OneLogin offers a comprehensive SAML authentication platform that enables organizations to secure access to applications and data seamlessly. The company is known for its user-friendly solutions and strong focus on enhancing identity security in the digital landscape.

- **Okta, Inc.**: Okta is a prominent player in the SAML authentication market, providing advanced identity management solutions to businesses worldwide. The company's innovative approach to authentication and access control has positioned it as a key player in the market.

- **IBM Corporation**: IBM offers a range of SAML authentication products and services designed to cater to the security needs of modern enterprises. With a strong emphasis on data protection and compliance, IBM remains a trusted player in the market.

- **Ping Identity**:Ping Identity is a notable player in the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication market, offering robust solutions to meet the evolving security needs of organizations. The company is recognized for its focus on providing secure and seamless access to applications and data through its advanced authentication platform. Ping Identity's emphasis on identity security and access management has enabled it to carve a niche for itself in the competitive market landscape. With a strong commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction, Ping Identity continues to enhance its offerings to address the complex security challenges faced by businesses globally.

In the dynamic market environment, Ping Identity stands out for its comprehensive approach to SAML authentication, which includes features such as single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and identity governance. These capabilities empower organizations to establish a secure digital ecosystem where user identities are protected, access controls are enforced, and data integrity is maintained. By focusing on seamless user experiences and stringent security protocols, Ping Identity has positioned itself as a trusted partner for enterprises looking to safeguard their sensitive information and mitigate cybersecurity risks effectively.

Furthermore, Ping Identity's strategic partnerships and collaborations with other technology providers have strengthened its market presence and expanded its reach to a diverse customer base. By integrating its SAML authentication solutions with complementary technologies such as identity and access management tools and cloud services, Ping Identity has been able to offer holistic security solutions that address the multifaceted security requirements of modern businesses. This approach not only enhances the value proposition for customers but also contributes to Ping Identity's reputation as a leading player in the authentication market.

As the demand for reliable authentication solutions continues to grow in response to escalating cyber threats and regulatory requirements, Ping Identity remains well-positioned to capitalize on market opportunities and drive innovation in the authentication space. By staying abreast of industry trends, investing in research and development, and adapting its offerings to meet evolving customer needs, Ping Identity is poised to sustain its competitive edge and play a pivotal role in shaping the future of SAML authentication technologies. With a customer-centric approach and a commitment to excellence,**Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market**

- **Component (Solution, Services)** - **Deployment Mode (On-Premise, Cloud-Based)** - **Organization Size (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Large Enterprises)** - **End User (Banking, Financial Services and Insurance, Government and Defense, IT and Telecommunications, Energy and Utilities, Manufacturing, Retail, Healthcare, Others)** - **Country (U.S., Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of South America, Germany, Italy, U.K., France, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, Turkey, Russia, Rest of Europe, Japan, China, India, South Korea, Australia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa) Industry Trends and Forecast to 2028**

The global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication market is witnessing substantial growth and is expected to continue its upward trajectory in the coming years. The component segment, comprising solutions and services, plays a pivotal role in driving market expansion. The increasing demand for SAML authentication solutions to secure digital identities and transactions is propelling the growth of the software sub-segment, while services are gaining traction as organizations seek professional assistance for implementation and management.

In terms of deployment mode, the cloud segment is experiencing rapid growth as businesses prioritize scalability and flexibility, although the on

Highlights of TOC:

Chapter 1: Market overview

Chapter 2: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Chapter 3: Regional analysis of the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market industry

Chapter 4: Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market segmentation based on types and applications

Chapter 5: Revenue analysis based on types and applications

Chapter 6: Market share

Chapter 7: Competitive Landscape

Chapter 8: Drivers, Restraints, Challenges, and Opportunities

Chapter 9: Gross Margin and Price Analysis

Key Questions Answered with this Study

1) What makes Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market feasible for long term investment?

2) Know value chain areas where players can create value?

3) Teritorry that may see steep rise in CAGR & Y-O-Y growth?

4) What geographic region would have better demand for product/services?

5) What opportunity emerging territory would offer to established and new entrants in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

6) Risk side analysis connected with service providers?

7) How influencing factors driving the demand of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication in next few years?

8) What is the impact analysis of various factors in the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market growth?

9) What strategies of big players help them acquire share in mature market?

10) How Technology and Customer-Centric Innovation is bringing big Change in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

Browse Trending Reports:

Spinocerebellar Ataxias Scas Market Johanson Blizzard Syndrome Market Steel Drums And Intermediate Bulk Containers Reduce Re Use And Recycle Market Diet Candy Market Date Palm Market Plant Based Functional Food Ingredients Market Glucose Syrup Market Picks Disease Treatment Market Vermouth Market Over The Counter Probiotic Supplements Market Motorcycle Market Heat Stabilizers Market Impotence Agents Market Fiber Drums Market Cereals And Grains Processing Market Soil Ph Adjusters Market

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 614 591 3140

UK: +44 845 154 9652

APAC : +653 1251 975

Email: [email protected]"

#Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

0 notes

thesahilkumar · 6 years ago

Text

Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market is expected to rise to an estimated value of USD 3.90 billion by 2026

Market Analysis: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market is expected to rise to an estimated value of USD 3.90 billion by 2026, registering a healthy CAGR in the forecast period of 2019-2026. This rise in market value can be attributed to the growing demand from various industrial verticals to provide an effective centralised identity and access management service.

Market Definition: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Security assertion markup language (SAML) is an open-world standard for users across the different applications involving the management of identities and accessing capabilities of that application. This standard is present and utilized specifically between a service providing organization and identity providing organization. This standard is written in XML-based markup language for utilizing communication protocols between the users and service providers.

For Free samples: https://databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-security-assertion-markup-language-saml-authentication-market

Segmentation: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

By Component (Solution, Services), Deployment Type (Cloud, On-Premise),

By Organization Size (SMEs, Large Enterprises),

By Vertical (BFSI, Government & Defense, IT & Telecommunications, Energy & Utilities, Manufacturing, Retail, Healthcare, Others),

By Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa) – Industry Trends and Forecast to 2026

Major Market Competitors/Players

Few of the major competitors currently working in the global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market are:

Gemalto NV;

Ping Identity;

Amazon Web Services, Inc.;

Microsoft;

Oracle;

miniOrange Inc.;

ZOHO Corp.;

OneLogin, Inc.;

Okta, Inc.; SAASPASS; Auth0, Inc.; Cirrus Identity, Inc.; Blackboard Inc.; PistolStar, Inc.; RCDevs SA; Ariel Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd.; BeyondTrust Corporation; salesforce.com inc.; SAP SE; Google; LIFERAY INC. and GitHub, Inc. among others.

Competitive Analysis

Global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market is highly fragmented and the major players have used various strategies such as new product launches, expansions, agreements, joint ventures, partnerships, acquisitions, and others to increase their footprints in this market. The report includes market shares of security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market for global, Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific, South America and Middle East & Africa.

For more report details: https://databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-security-assertion-markup-language-saml-authentication-market

#Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market trends #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market size #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market growth #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market application

0 notes

nitu5965 · 4 years ago

Text

Identity as a Service Market 2020 to 2027 – Market Share, Growth, Statistics, Competitor Landscape, Key Players Analysis, Trends and Forecasts

Market Synopsis

Market Research Future (MRFR) conducted study on the Identity As A Service Market 2020 and detailed insights into the effect of COVID pandemic on the market in the report. According to MRFR analysis, the identity as a service (IDaaS) market can rise at 18.4% CAGR across the forecast period. By 2027, the identity as a service (IDaaS) market value can cross USD 10 Bn.

The growing deployment of IDaaS on largely accepted cloud platform can boost the expansion of the IDaaS market across the review period. The increase in the adoption of SaaS-based IAM offerings that allow organizations to use single sign-on (SSO) via OpenID Connect (OIDC) or Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) for the authentication and access controls to provide secured access to enterprises' SaaS applications can promote the expansion of the world market of IDaaS.

The growing need to curb on-site infrastructure that can support a wide range of integration options can boost the expansion of the IDaaS market. The rise in the level of interconnectivity as IoT and BYOD culture are trending across different verticals can bolster the expansion of the IDaaS market. Rise in IDaaS vendors can also benefit the global market.

The high utility of DevSecOps practices for the identification and access management in organizations can fuel the expansion of the market growth. The growing concerns of companies regarding data security limit is pressing the need for IDaaS solutions that can promote the expansion of the global identity as a service (IDaaS) market in the years to come. The rise in preference for on-premise access management systems can pose threat to the IDaaS market.

Request a Free Sample @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/7928

Market Segmentation

The segments study of the global IDaaS market is based on deployment, service, organization size, and vertical.

The service-based, the global IDaaS market segments are access, identity governance & administration, and intelligence.

The organization size based, the global IDaaS market segments are large enterprise and small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME).

The deployment based, the global IDaaS market segments are public cloud, private cloud, and hybrid.

The vertical based, the global IDaaS market segments are BFSI, retail and CPG, manufacturing, energy and utilities, transportation, healthcare and life sciences, and government and defense among others.

Regional Analysis

North America IDaaS market is expected to secure the highest global market size in the forecast period. Led by the US, the market in North America can rise exponentially due to the early adoption of DevSecOps that aids in the identification and allows access to management and strict government directives associated with data protection. The increase in cyber threats and high growing demand for potential and powerful authentication solutions on cloud can drive the IDaaS market in North America.

In Asia Pacific, the IDaaS market can expand rapidly in evaluation period. The growing BYOD trend and increase in IoT applications across verticals and increase in the awareness among enterprises regarding security issues can promote the IDaaS market in the Asia Pacific region. APAC is observed to hold high growth prospects, thus the expansion of the IDaaS market in the Asia Pacific region is expected to rise substantially.

Key Players

MRFR identified some notable players of the global IDaaS market. They are; Okta, Inc. (US), Avatier (US), OneLogin, Inc (US), Fischer Identity (US), Microsoft Corporation, (US), Oracle Corporation (US), Centrify Corporation (US), Ping Identity (US), iWelcome (Netherlands), empowerID (US),VMWare (US), LoginRadius (Canada), IDaptive, LLC. (US), Ubisecure, Inc. (Finland), Sailpoint (US), Optimal IdM(US), Bitium, Inc. (US), and others. These players are recognized by origin, regional presence, recent key innovations, industry expertise, and product diversification.

Access Report Details @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/identity-service-market-7928

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Scope of The Report

2.1 Market Definition

2.2 Scope of The Study

2.2.1 Research Objectives

2.2.2 Assumptions & Limitations

2.3 Markets Structure

3 Market Research Methodology

3.1 Research Process

3.2 Secondary Research

3.3 Primary Research

3.4 Forecast Model

Continued…

About Market Research Future

At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services.

Contact

Market Research Future

Phone: +1646 845 9312

Email: [email protected]

#Identity as a Service Market IDaaS Market Size IDaaS Market Share Idaas Market Trends Identity as a Service Industry

0 notes

ehteshamuniverse · 5 years ago

Text

Identity as a Service (IDaaS) Market Outstanding Growth, status, Price, Business Opportunities and Key Findings | COVID-19 Analysis

Market Highlights

The global Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS) market 2020 offers a steady compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2019 to 2024 of 18.4%, making the total market worth USD 10.8 billion in 2024. These figures are accumulated after an in-depth study has been conducted through Market Research Future that eminently focuses on the information and communication industry. The industry brings up the study case based on commentary on the key influencing factors, market statistics, revenues gains, segmental data, regional data, are focused that eventually captures all the facets of the evolving global identity as a service (IDaaS) market.

Key Drivers & Barriers

Identity-as-a-Service is becoming more popular amongst many organizations across the globe, owing to its feasibility in terms of management and cost range. It could be defined as a cloud-based service used explicitly for providing identity and access management solutions. It is beneficial, as it not only reduces on-site infrastructure but also offers a wide range of integration options. The significant concerns regarding the hype of Identity-as-a-Service are identity and data protection as well as trusting a third party with sensitive business data.

The global Identity-as-a-Service market is perceiving growth owing to the beneficiaries that it provides to the enterprises to use sign-on (SSO) with using Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) or OpenID Connect (OIDC), authentication and access controls to give secure access to software and SaaS applications. As per the study, medium and large scale industries are adopting this type of authentication infrastructure rapidly. Even the factor such as increasing level of interconnectivity owing to rising IoT and BYOD trends across verticals is yet offering lucrative opportunities for the IDaaS vendors capitalizing on the market in the forecast period.

Identity as a service (IDaaS) operates on virtualized hardware. Hence, the accessibility IDaaS without physical complexities is expected to encourage its adoption across enterprises. This is expected to boost the expansion of the worldwide IDaaS market. Advantages of the multi-tenant infrastructure of IDaaS is expected to benefit its market growth. IDaaS allows vendors to issue updates and aids in security fixtures. This is likely to contribute to the expansion of the market across the assessment years. IDaaS use cloud computing, which is considered to be another significant driver for the market. Cloud computing supports digital access cards, multi-factor authentication, and biometrics. These features of cloud computing simplify the process to retrieve information, maintaining high degree of security. IDaaS uses analytics and intelligence to report multifaceted relationships, such as association between users, their responsibilities, job function, and usage of data. This is anticipated to work in favor of the IDaaS market.

Segmentation:

The global Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS) market size has been analyzed upon various segments such as organization size, service, deployment, and vertical.

Depending on service segment, the global market of IDaaS comprises of access, identity governance & administration, and intelligence.

Depending on organization size segment, the IDaaS market comprises of small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) and large enterprise.

Depending on deployment, the IDaaS market includes public cloud, private cloud, and hybrid.

Depending on vertical segment, the IDaaS market comprises of IT and telecommunication, banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI), energy and utilities, retail and CPG, healthcare and life sciences, manufacturing, government and defense, transportation, and more.

Regional Framework

Analysts of MRFR’s study on the identity-as-a-service (IDaaS) market has marked some of the key regions for determining the market’s future shares and rising stakeholders. North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the rest of the world are chosen regions where study of the market has been conducted.

North America region has the potential to acquire the prominent market size in the forecast period. The US leads the market in this region, owing to the early adoption of DevSecOps practices for identity and access management. Even strict government directives for data protection are rising, which is yet another prime reason for the market’s spread in a rapid mode. The rising cyber threats and growing demand for strong identification and authentication solutions on the cloud are also motivating the IDaaS market in the region.

Similarly, growth aspects in BFSI, retail& consumer electronics, as well as the healthcare industry in countries such as China and India in the Asia Pacific, are fostering the market’s share. Rapid infrastructure development, speedy advancements in technology, fast-expanding electronic payment industry, the growing trend of the BYOD policy, as well as huge adoption of cloud security solutions are also becoming the reason for identity-as-a-service market’s growth in the region.

Market Players

Leading players in the identity-as-a-service landscape are IDaptive, LLC. (US), Oracle Corporation (US), Okta, Inc. (US), Avatier (US), OneLogin, Inc (US), Microsoft Corporation, (US), Centrify Corporation (US), Fischer Identity (US), Ping Identity (US), iWelcome (Netherlands), VMWare (US), empowerID (US), LoginRadius (Canada), and Ubisecure, Inc. (Finland).

Related Reports:

https://view.joomag.com/privileged-identity-management-market-share/0318315001591336962

https://view.joomag.com/mobile-advertising-market/0023379001591337162

https://view.joomag.com/industrial-cyber-security-market-share/0961746001591337371

https://view.joomag.com/passenger-information-system-market/0435578001591337572

https://view.joomag.com/ai-market-share/0422721001591337792

0 notes

viditure · 6 years ago

Text

SSO – the new standard in password optimisation

Who hasn’t fallen prey to password fatigue from time to time? The plethora of passwords we have to memorise and re-create for applications and resources, such as data centres, cloud applications and social networking sites has exploded over the last few years. This has not only led to frustration and wasted hours, but also serious security risks. The sheer volume of passwords as well as requirements to make them increasingly complex and randomised has made it impossible for people to create a unique and strong password every time. The result? Most people use a simple obvious password for every service – which leaves their accounts vulnerable to hacking – or even worse, they write their secret codes down and leave them near their computer…

Single sign-on (SSO) authentication allows users to sign into a system only once and still access third party services It is a cost-effective and safe way to provide customers, suppliers and employees complete access to data and application functionality across multiple related, yet independent software systems.

A growth market

With the rise in cloud technology, mobile, and social media, the global SSO market is expanding fast and is predicted to almost double in size to $1.6 billion by 2021. Although it is spread across the globe, North America accounts for most of the share, and major growth is expected in the Asia-Pacific region with the increasing adoption of single sign-on solutions across India, China, Japan, and Australia. Single sign-on solutions have especially high demand in the banking, financial services and insurance sectors (with centralised session management), but are also widely used in retail, IT and telecom, education, healthcare and life sciences, communications media & services, as well as the travel and hospitality industries.

How does it work?

It couldn’t be easier… When an employee tries to log in to an internal or external company program, the form asks for the company name. When the user provides the details, the service checks if the they are allowed to use the application – the third-party Active Directory (AD) then checks the user’s access rights. The user only needs to enter their credentials once.

The key benefits of SSO

One password to rule them all!

Your users will only have to manage one password to access their whole solution environment. By logging in once to your company environment, they will automatically be connected to each solution to which they have access rights. This is far easier than trying to memorise multiple passwords or writing them down on paper or in a file on your desktop – both of these can be stolen.

Managing your users’ password policy

As your company handles the single password linked to your account, they can define strong password policies for all accesses through that gateway. This is a distinct advantage over the major web solution providers who often demand that users create passwords that are at least eight characters long – don’t contain your user name, real name, or company name – don’t contain a complete word – are significantly different from previous passwords – don’t contain uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numbers, or symbols, etc. etc. etc.

These requirements are all designed to prevent hackers or bots from guessing your password. When your company uses SSO, they can easily be set on your AD. And by using only one password, your company will apply these policies to all their solutions making the access to any solution considerably safer.

Control users’ accesses to any solution

As long as the solution provides an SSO login system, most ADs can control user access to the range of company solutions. This not only facilitates the management of your company’s employee access rights; it is also useful for centralising the control of your user login details – it removes the need to delete user access on all solutions manually.

This is a huge timesaver if you need to remove an employee’s access to several third-party tools simultaneously – for example if they leave the company. Without SSO, when an employee who has had access to confidential data leaves, IT needs to systematically remove their access rights to each tool. This is risky and can leave holes in a company’s security. SSO is quick and failproof way to cover all the bases when staff leave.

Safer login with strong known secured protocol

Although SSO allows you to have global access to various third-party tools, it requires state-of-the-art technologies to ensure that there are no leaks, and that your users’ logins and credentials can’t be easily hacked. AT Internet’s SAML 2.0 (Security Assertion Markup Language) and OpenID lead the tech market for login authentication systems. As part of the Analytics Suite, SAML and OpenID’s access rights system provides an SSO login framework that helps you build an easier and safer access to its solutions.

Stay secure and remain competitive!

Adopting a clear strategy for distributed identity management is key to guaranteeing a secure workplace and staying competitive. A federated identity solution is important for any company trying to manage access to external services by internal users – and provide access to its internal systems by external users. It allows secure access to a range of applications, as well as centralising their management, and improving the monitoring and auditing of security credentials. It also cuts down on admin costs and the associated headaches…

Article SSO – the new standard in password optimisation first appeared on Digital Analytics Blog.

from Digital Analytics Blog https://ift.tt/2Ja1kxS via IFTTT

#IFTTT #Digital Analytics Blog

0 notes

siemenlee · 6 years ago

Link

#Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market Trends #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market Industry #Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market News

0 notes

aimarketresearch · 24 days ago

Text

Security Assertion Markup Language Authentication Market Size, Share, Trends, Growth Opportunities and Competitive Outlook

Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market - Size, Share, Demand, Industry Trends and Opportunities

Access Full 350 Pages PDF Report @

**Segments**

**Market Players**

Highlights of TOC:

Chapter 1: Market overview

Chapter 2: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Chapter 3: Regional analysis of the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market industry

Chapter 4: Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market segmentation based on types and applications

Chapter 5: Revenue analysis based on types and applications

Chapter 6: Market share

Chapter 7: Competitive Landscape

Chapter 8: Drivers, Restraints, Challenges, and Opportunities

Chapter 9: Gross Margin and Price Analysis

Key Questions Answered with this Study

1) What makes Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market feasible for long term investment?

2) Know value chain areas where players can create value?

3) Teritorry that may see steep rise in CAGR & Y-O-Y growth?

4) What geographic region would have better demand for product/services?

5) What opportunity emerging territory would offer to established and new entrants in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

6) Risk side analysis connected with service providers?

7) How influencing factors driving the demand of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication in next few years?

8) What is the impact analysis of various factors in the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market growth?

9) What strategies of big players help them acquire share in mature market?

10) How Technology and Customer-Centric Innovation is bringing big Change in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

Browse Trending Reports:

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 614 591 3140

UK: +44 845 154 9652

APAC : +653 1251 975

Email: [email protected]

#market analysis #market research #market share

0 notes

terabitweb · 6 years ago

Text

Original Post from SC Magazine Author: victorthomas

Cloud-based IAM puts authentication to the test

Traditional brick-and-mortar organizations with on-premise servers are striving every day to keep pace with cloud-driven digital enterprises that are untethered by physical restraints, enabling employees to work from anywhere, accessing applications, services and mobile devices as regular parts of their flexible workdays.

However, much like ducks on the surface of a pond, the challenges inherent in migrating from traditional, on-premise operations to transformed, cloud-driven services is generating a frenzy of activity just beneath the surface.

For most organizations, migrating to cloud services is still heavily labor and resource-intensive, and can create serious operational deficiencies if not properly implemented with security protections built-in from the start. And those ongoing operational deficiencies only widen the attack surface, threatening to harm an organization’s bottom line.

This is why organizations must focus on reducing complexities and strengthen security protections, especially identity and access management (IAM). Finding ways to make IAM simpler and more informative can help reduce operational risks, although it remains a daunting challenge for most organizations today.

IAM is used in both traditional and cloud-based organizations to protect assets, ensure user identities, achieve regulatory compliance and deliver friendlier customer experiences in an agile, efficient way. Access Management-as-a-Service (AMaaS) offerings are growing increasingly popular. Gartner Inc., estimates that 75 percent or more of clients based in North America and approximately 50 percent in Europe, and some APAC region countries are seeking Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS) delivery models for new access management purchases.

Most companies today fully recognize the need to protect identities and manage access to corporate resources. But “they often fall short when it comes to planning for and investing in necessary security mechanisms such as IAM, to help ensure strong asset protection,” says Michael Osterman, president of Osterman Research, Inc.

To shrink a company’s attack surface, Osterman recommends that organizations use a centralized repository “to create, authenticate, and save user identities in a single, ‘federated’ identity database.”

Critical operational systems require higher levels of authentication, he adds. And “behavioral analytics can help an organization establish what actions constitute normal behavior and what other actions might be problematic,” he explains.

But while executives grasp the concepts involved in IAM, “they typically don’t invest until something bad happens,” he adds.

Traditional IAM tools are often cumbersome and complex to deploy and maintain, and many cloud services do not deploy automatically with strong IAM security mechanisms in place. This means, as organizations migrate more of their infrastructure to the cloud, the need to address complex authorization controls for cloud-based resources will only grow. Policy-driven, attribute-based access controls (ABAC) for IAM can help provide fast, dynamic authorization to cloud services, Osterman says, enabling secure access to services, along with other critical assets, such as applications and data stored in the cloud.

Michael Osterman, president, Osterman Research

Managing identities and access

IAM is used to manage the roles and access privileges of individual users and the circumstances by which users are granted (or denied) access privileges. Users can include everyone from customers to suppliers to partners and employees. IAM creates one digital identity per individual. Once a digital identity has been established, it must be maintained, modified and monitored throughout each user’s access lifecycle.

IAM is considered crucial to controlling access to enterprise resources, by the right users, in the right context, from the time a user joins an organization and gains permission to access certain resources to that user’s departure and timely de-authorization. Security administrators use IAM tools and technologies to change a user’s role, track user activities, create reports about user activities, and continuously enforce access control policies.

Designed originally to provide a means for administering and controlling employee access, either to applications or to physical buildings across an organization, IAM tools also help ensure compliance with corporate policies and government regulations, says Bill Newhouse, deputy director of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) and senior security engineer at the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE), both based out of the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) offices in Gaithersburg, Md.

There are two basic security elements required to control access to systems and data: authentication and authorization. Authentication is the process required to sign into an application or log in to a computer. The entire purpose of authentication, including multi-factor authentication (MFA), is to enable security functions to complete authorization, Newhouse explains.

Authorization determines which buttons a user can click, which accounts he or she may edit, and even which files or databases each user is allowed to access.

MFA has grown to become an essential element of cloud-based IAM, to ensure user identities no matter where they are working from on any given day. There are some weaknesses, however, says Adrian Lane, security analyst and CTO for Securosis in Phoenix. “There have been SMS messages advances such as behavioral analytics for both the user and devices, to authenticate users.

“Cloud security providers typically use multiple attributes and can adjust access policies for any user or role, which dramatically improves identity and access control,” Lane explains. In too many cases, however, “organizations have yet to take full advantage of the more granular, attribute-based, policy-driven IAM services available from cloud security providers,” he adds.

Understanding cloud IAM

Cloud-based IAM security services are considered next-generation tools, combining concepts of Identity-as-a-Service (IaaS) and enterprise mobility management (EMM).

While traditional or legacy IAM products were designed to handle logins and user activities from a centralized location, for a specific enterprise, or for proprietary applications and known endpoints, cloud identity management is optimized for integration across devices, operating systems, applications and resources.

Andras Cser, analyst, Forrester Research

This is essential because migration to the cloud opens access to endpoints that are typically outside of brick and mortar buildings and spread across multiple locations, Lane explains.

Industry observers maintain cloud IAM services can manage user access to Wi-Fi networks, connect cloud servers, and facilitate authentication. Properly implemented, it can prevent outside threat actors from reaching corporate databases and in a “least privileges” security model, it also keeps insider threats at bay.

As organizations modernize, some are finding cloud-based IAM is often not well suited for accessing on-premises applications. Authentication protocols must expand and scale as an organization’s IT environment scales, to provide necessary security protections, while balancing employee and customer needs for access to resources. As organizations embrace cloud services, they need stronger, all-around governance across all platforms. This creates an operational challenge with underlying technical difficulties, according to Gartner Research Vice President Lori Robinson.

Gartner analysts maintain cloud IAM that leverages SAML-based (Security Assertion Markup Language) authentication and multifactor authentication can help IT security teams manage the challenges involved with decentralized user accounts. According to Gartner, “access to cloud databases and assets must be tightly monitored, especially during employee onboarding and off-boarding processes. Cloud IAM services can also track which users are accessing which resources and when, which is vital information for security and regulatory compliance.”

As organizations migrate to cloud services they must focus on how cloud services are accessed, along with the speed and pace of migrating additional apps and services. The trouble is, many organizations today still struggle to properly implement traditional on-premise IAM, says NIST’s Newhouse.

Each organization’s security teams must gain a clear understanding of whether current IAM platforms will also protect cloud storage. If not, it is time to evaluate cloud-based IAM alternatives. “Employees, customers and the organization’s reputation are at stake without proper IAM security protections in place,” says Newhouse.

Merritt Maxim, analyst, Forrester Research

Ultimately, every organization needs strong IAM to protect cloud and on-premise resources. A recent Forrester Research report says cloud-based IAM has “completely transformed the IAM market landscape,” by delivering identity and access management at a reduced cost and with less complexity, adding cloud scalability and elasticity advantages. Analysts Andras Cser and Merritt Maxim describe the current IAM market as currently “divided between established vendors with ‘on-premise pedigree’ who are making the switch to the cloud, and those ‘born in the cloud.’”

While legacy systems and security vendors provide robust IAM capabilities, Forrester analysts warn those platforms can be difficult to implement and maintain. In some cases, industry analysts report IAM platforms have failed to live up to expectations because of their cost and increasing complexity. Many organizations face difficulties integrating access control between older on-premise servers and cloud services.

“While extending IAM to the cloud in hybrid environments isn’t an insurmountable challenge, it’s no easy task, and many organizations end up opting to outsource this task,” says Lane.

One cloud IAM challenge occurs in identity provisioning — the secure and timely management of on-boarding and off-boarding users in the cloud. “It takes careful planning to ensure system resources are properly allocated so performance doesn’t degrade drastically when more users than expected login to access those resources,” Lane explains. According to Forrester’s Cser and Maxim, cloud-native providers deliver IAM features that are easier to implement and use, but which “may not offer the same depth of policy management capabilities that some on-premise pedigree vendors do.”

Choosing the right IAM platform is largely dependent on each organization’s priorities. One organization might choose to focus on securing super user accounts for privileged access management (PAM), while another in a more contentious regulatory arena might focus instead on the management of digital roles or identity governance and administration (IGA). Still other enterprises could opt for modern biometric authentication (BA).

“Only by comparing IAM platforms can an organization determine what will work best to properly secure digital identities,” says Osterman.

Overcoming challenges

Organizations must alter their deployment methods, and the ways they use security tools to effectively manage IAM across multiple cloud services. “There’s a steep learning curve and education required to gain a better understanding of how to manage identities in the cloud,” says Lane.

Another challenge involves managing identities across multiple organizations. Advances such as federated identity management (FIM) can help here, according to Newhouse. FIM enables organizations to authenticate users of cloud services, using the organization’s chosen identity provider. For example, a user with a Google account identity can add various applications provided by external providers. The user logs on using his or her Google account ID to access any applications, and is authenticated and authorized as needed.

Adrian Lane, security analyst and CTO, Securosis

Those just starting the process of purchasing IAM, or in search of a new cloud-based IAM platform, must properly compare current IAM platforms and services. While it is possible to control access manually to organizational resources, manually controlling privileges is often unreliable and inflexible. Ultimately, specialized tools are still needed to ensure the organization’s security team can properly manage identities and access to resources. As companies strive to modernize, automate and streamline operations, Gartner recommends organizations examine leading cloud IAM alternatives to achieve greater security, privacy and regulatory compliance.

Gartner recommends that organizations “craft a robust cloud IAM strategy. Automate and simplify IAM processes for agility and efficiency. Meet changing customer needs with consumer IAM. Protect APIs and ramp up fraud protection.”

Tips and best practices

Gartner recommends organizations focus on “careful” scaling — too narrow creates inconsistent enforcement, too broad will only increase complexity. And the stakes are high. Gartner predicts that by 2021, enterprises with IAM tools will be at a 50 percent lower risk of advanced threat impacts compared to their peers.

Gartner recommends organizations hone in on ways to reduce: Reduce the number of permanent privileged accounts. Reduce the number of shared accounts. Reduce the duration of temporary privileges. Reduce the entitlements of each account. Embracing a principle of least privilege, in which each account has as few entitlements as possible, should be the rule.

Industry observers also stress that organizations must embrace greater governance, especially IGA. Without IGA, organizations risk excess privileges, orphaned accounts, and ownership conflicts that will plague the organization. IGA can aid compliance efforts, audit privileged accounts, and enable access certification. Integrating IAM with IGA can provide the most comprehensive identity and access management available.

Organizations leveraging social media to interact with customers and increase brand awareness need strong IAM in place to protect corporate accounts. Using MFA to alert users of multiple failed login attempts, and educating employees on social media security is crucial to reducing the risk of social identity breaches, according to Lane.

Organizations with many on-premise servers should consider issuing SAML tokens or other assertions that focus on creating roles users can assume to reduce the potential for propagating tens of thousands of orphaned user accounts in the cloud. “When security administrators propagate roles linked to specific job requirements, they can easily add SAML tokens to give users resource access. And when a user leaves, the role remains, Lane explains.

To simplify IAM in hybrid cloud environments, it is important to also focus on ways to reduce access latency to cloud services. Organizations must reduce the latency caused by sending authentication and local authorization requests from the cloud back to on-premise servers, says Lane.

Futures

Industry observers expect organizations will start to embrace greater identity governance elements as they work to better manage identities and access to valuable information and personal identity resources, across everything from mobile devices to cloud services.

Looking ahead, those observers expect growing interest in the ways that IAM fits into the internet of things, or more appropriately, the identity of things. As the number of intelligent things skyrockets, Osterman says, “it’s not difficult to imagine scenarios in which a refrigerator or other smart home technology could be compromised, enabling a hacker to access a consumer’s home network. Because IoT technologies have been rushed to market without a clear focus on security, including IAM, the potential for breaches is enormous.”

Gartner’s Robinson expects artificial intelligence-driven analytics will improve IAM efficiency, especially in reducing bloated administrative procedures, or fraud prevention. Cloud IAM providers can help organizations enable adaptive authentication, analyzing both positive and negative signals of trust to look for ‘normal’ patterns from individual users or types of users.

As organizations increasingly embrace cloud services to achieve digital transformation, they hopefully are starting to realize that their success will depend on IAM.

The post No ID? Get off my cloud appeared first on SC Media.

#gallery-0-5 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-5 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 33%; } #gallery-0-5 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-5 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Go to Source Author: victorthomas No ID? Get off my cloud Original Post from SC Magazine Author: victorthomas Cloud-based IAM puts authentication to the test Traditional brick-and-mortar organizations with on-premise…

#SC Magazine

0 notes

harshnews · 8 months ago

Text

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market Size, Share, Trends, Growth and Competitive Analysis

"Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market – Industry Trends and Forecast to 2028

Access Full 350 Pages PDF Report @

**Segments**

**Market Players**

Highlights of TOC:

Chapter 1: Market overview

Chapter 2: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Chapter 3: Regional analysis of the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market industry

Chapter 4: Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market segmentation based on types and applications

Chapter 5: Revenue analysis based on types and applications

Chapter 6: Market share

Chapter 7: Competitive Landscape

Chapter 8: Drivers, Restraints, Challenges, and Opportunities

Chapter 9: Gross Margin and Price Analysis

Key Questions Answered with this Study

1) What makes Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market feasible for long term investment?

2) Know value chain areas where players can create value?

3) Teritorry that may see steep rise in CAGR & Y-O-Y growth?

4) What geographic region would have better demand for product/services?

5) What opportunity emerging territory would offer to established and new entrants in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

6) Risk side analysis connected with service providers?

7) How influencing factors driving the demand of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication in next few years?

8) What is the impact analysis of various factors in the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market growth?

9) What strategies of big players help them acquire share in mature market?

10) How Technology and Customer-Centric Innovation is bringing big Change in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

Browse Trending Reports:

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 614 591 3140

UK: +44 845 154 9652

APAC : +653 1251 975

Email: [email protected]"

#Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

0 notes

thesahilkumar · 6 years ago

Link

#Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market #Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market news #Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market analysis #Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market research #Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market size

0 notes

jadedvillager-blog · 7 years ago

Text

Security Technologies

Biometrics

Biometrics is the measurement and statistical analysis of people's unique physical and behavioral characteristics. The technology is mainly used for identification and access control, or for identifying individuals who are under surveillance. The basic premise of biometric authentication is that every person can be accurately identified by his or her intrinsic physical or behavioral traits.

Authentication by biometric verification is becoming increasingly common in corporate and public security systems, consumer electronics, and point-of-sale applications. In addition to security, the driving force behind biometric verification has been convenience, as there are no passwords to remember or security tokens to carry. Some biometric methods, such as measuring a person's gait, can operate with no direct contact with the person being authenticated. Biometric data may be held in a centralized database, although modern biometric implementations often depend instead on gathering biometric data locally and then cryptographically hashing it, so that authentication or identification can be accomplished without direct access to the biometric data itself.

Biometric identifiers depend on the uniqueness of the factor being considered. For example, fingerprints are generally considered to be highly unique to each person. Fingerprint recognition, especially as implemented in Apple's Touch ID for the iPhone, is the first widely used mass market application of a biometric authentication factor. The greatest privacy issue of using biometrics is that physical attributes like fingerprints and retinal blood vessel patterns are generally static and cannot be modified. This is in distinction to nonbiometric factors like passwords (something you know) and tokens (something you have), which can be replaced if they are breached or otherwise compromised, including over 20 million individuals whose fingerprints were compromised in the 2014 U.S. Office of Personnel Management data breach. The increasing ubiquity of high-quality cameras, microphones and fingerprint readers in many of today's mobile devices means biometrics will continue to become a more common method for authenticating users, particularly as Fast ID Online (FIDO) has specified new standards for authentication with biometrics that support two-factor authentication with biometric factors.

While high-quality cameras and other sensors help enable the use of biometrics, they can also enable attackers. Because people do not shield their faces, ears, hands, voice or gait, attacks are possible simply by capturing biometric data from people without their consent or knowledge.

Encryption

In computing, encryption is the method by which plaintext or any other type of data is converted from a readable form to an encoded version that can only be decoded by another entity if they have access to a decryption key. Encryption is one of the most important methods for providing data security, especially for end-to-end protection of data transmitted across networks.

Encryption is widely used on the internet to protect user information being sent between a browser and a server, including passwords, payment information and other personal information that should be considered private. Organizations and individuals also commonly use encryption to protect sensitive data stored on computers, servers and mobile devices like phones or tablets.

Unencrypted data, often referred to as plaintext, is encrypted using an encryption algorithm and an encryption key. This process generates ciphertext that can only be viewed in its original form if decrypted with the correct key. Decryption is simply the inverse of encryption, following the same steps but reversing the order in which the keys are applied.

Traditional public key cryptography depends on the properties of large prime numbers and the computational difficulty of factoring those primes. Elliptical curve cryptography (ECC) enables another kind of public key cryptography that depends on the properties of the elliptic curve equation; the resulting cryptographic algorithms can be faster and more efficient and can produce comparable levels of security with shorter cryptographic keys. As a result, ECC algorithms are often implemented in internet of things devices and other products with limited computing resources.

Encryption is used to protect data stored on a system (encryption in place or encryption at rest); many internet protocols define mechanisms for encrypting data moving from one system to another (data in transit). Some applications tout the use of end-to-end encryption (E2EE) to guarantee data being sent between two parties cannot be viewed by an attacker that intercepts the communication channel. Use of an encrypted communication circuit, as provided by Transport Layer Security (TLS) between web client and web server software, is not always enough to insure E2EE; typically, the actual content being transmitted is encrypted by client software before being passed to a web client, and decrypted only by the recipient.

Encryption was almost exclusively used only by governments and large enterprises until the late 1970s when the Diffie-Hellman key exchange and RSA algorithms were first published -- and the first personal computers were introduced. By the mid-1990s, both public key and private key encryption were being routinely deployed in web browsers and servers to protect sensitive data. Encryption is now an important part of many products and services, used in the commercial and consumer realms to protect data both while it is in transit and while it is stored, such as on a hard drive, smartphone or flash drive (data at rest).

Encryption is usually a two-way function, meaning the same algorithm can be used to encrypt plaintext and to decrypt ciphertext. A cryptographic hash function can be viewed as a type of one-way function for encryption, meaning the function output cannot easily be reversed to recover the original input. Hash functions are commonly used in many aspects of security to generate digital signatures and data integrity checks. They take an electronic file, message or block of data and generate a short digital fingerprint of the content called a message digest or hash value.

For any cipher, the most basic method of attack is brute force; trying each key until the right one is found. The length of the key determines the number of possible keys, hence the feasibility of this type of attack. Encryption strength is directly tied to key size, but as the key size increases so, too, do the resources required to perform the computation. Alternative methods of breaking a cipher include side-channel attacks, which don't attack the actual cipher but the physical side effects of its implementation. An error in system design or execution can allow such attacks to succeed. Attackers may also attempt to break a targeted cipher through cryptanalysis, the process of attempting to find a weakness in the cipher that can be exploited with a complexity less than a brute-force attack. The challenge of successfully attacking a cipher is easier if the cipher itself is already flawed. For example, there have been suspicions that interference from the National Security Agency weakened the Data Encryption Standard algorithm, and following revelations from former NSA analyst and contractor Edward Snowden, many believe the NSA has attempted to subvert other cryptography standards and weaken encryption products. More recently, law enforcement agencies such as the FBI have criticized technology companies that offer end-to-end encryption, arguing that such encryption prevents law enforcement from accessing data and communications even with a warrant. The FBI has referred to this issue as "Going Dark," while the U.S. Department of Justice has proclaimed the need for "responsible encryption" that can be unlocked by technology companies under a court order.

Access Control Software

Access control is a security technique that regulates who or what can view or use resources in a computing environment. It is a fundamental concept in security that minimizes risk to the business or organization.

To secure a facility, organizations use electronic access control systems that rely on user credentials, access card readers, auditing and reports to track employee access to restricted business locations and proprietary areas, such as data centers. Some of these systems incorporate access control panels to restrict entry to rooms and buildings as well as alarms and lockdown capabilities to prevent unauthorized access or operations. Access control systems perform identification authentication and authorization of users and entities by evaluating required login credentials that can include passwords, personal identification numbers (PINs), biometric scans, security tokens or other authentication factors. Multifactor authentication, which requires two or more authentication factors, is often an important part of layered defense to protect access control systems. These security controls work by identifying an individual or entity, verifying that the person or application is who or what it claims to be, and authorizing the access level and set of actions associated with the username or IP address. Directory services and protocols, including the Local Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), provide access controls for authenticating and authorizing users and entities and enabling them to connect to computer resources, such as distributed applications and web servers. Organizations use different access control models depending on their compliance requirements and the security levels of information technology they are trying to protect.

The goal of access control is to minimize the risk of unauthorized access to physical and logical systems. Access control is a fundamental component of security compliance programs that ensures security technology and access control policies are in place to protect confidential information, such as customer data. Most organizations have infrastructure and procedures that limit access to networks, computer systems, applications, files and sensitive data, such as personally identifiable information and intellectual property. Access control systems are complex and can be challenging to manage in dynamic IT environments that involve on-premises systems and cloud services. After some high-profile breaches, technology vendors have shifted away from single sign-on systems to unified access management, which offers access controls for on-premises and cloud environments.

Access control is a process that is integrated into an organization's IT environment. It can involve identity and access management systems. These systems provide access control software, a user database, and management tools for access control policies, auditing and enforcement.

When a user is added to an access management system, system administrators use an automated provisioning system to set up permissions based on access control frameworks, job responsibilities and workflows. The best practice of "least privilege" restricts access to only resources that an employee requires to perform their immediate job functions. A common security issue is failure to revoke credentials and access to systems and data when an individual moves into a different job internally or leaves the company.

Firewall

A firewall is a network security device that monitors incoming and outgoing network traffic and decides whether to allow or block specific traffic based on a defined set of security rules. Firewalls have been a first line of defense in network security for over 25 years. They establish a barrier between secured and controlled internal networks that can be trusted and untrusted outside networks, such as the Internet. A firewall can be hardware, software, or both.

In the early days of the internet, when AT&T's Steven M. Bellovin first used the firewall metaphor, network traffic primarily flowed north-south. This simply means that most of the traffic in a data center flowed from client-to-server and server-to-client. In the past few years, however, virtualization and trends such as converged infrastructure have created more east-west traffic, which means that sometimes the largest volume of traffic in a data center is moving from server-to-server. To deal with this change, some enterprise organizations have migrated from the traditional three-layer data center architectures to various forms of leaf-spine architectures.

References: https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/biometrics https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/encryption https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/access-control https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/firewalls/what-is-a-firewall.html https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/firewall

0 notes

knoldus · 7 years ago

Link

Every company’s most valuable asset is its data. However, that data is also constantly under threat from bad actors around the world. To retain the trust of their customers, partners, and shareholders, every business needs to protect their data and applications. DC/OS Enterprise offers a range of features that allows you to secure your cluster and prevent breaches and other attacks. So, let’s see the various different mechanisms through which DC/OS manages the security.

DC/OS is based on a Linux kernel and userspace. The same best practices for securing any Linux system apply to securing DC/OS, including setting correct file permissions, restricting root and normal user accounts, protecting network interfaces with iptables or other firewalls, and regularly applying updates from the Linux distribution used with DC/OS to ensure that system libraries, utilities, and core services like systemd and OpenSSH are secure.

The goals of DC/OS security are:

Isolate the cluster perimeter with strong authentication and authorization across all interfaces.

Secure and protect the internal cluster communication, containers, and sandboxes.

Enhance cluster security with support for 3rd party security integrations.

Security Zones

At the highest level, we can distinguish three security zones in a DC/OS deployment, which are admin, private, and public security zones.

The admin zone is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS and SSH connections and provides access to the master nodes. It also provides reverse proxy access to the other nodes in the cluster via URL routing. Access to the admin zone is controlled by the Admin Router. The Admin Router denies access to most HTTP endpoints for unauthenticated requests. In order for a request to be authenticated, it needs to present a valid authentication token in its Authorization header.

The private zone is a non-routable network that is only accessible from the admin zone or through the edge router from the public zone. Deployed services are run in the private zone. This zone is where the majority of agent nodes are run.

The optional public zone is where publicly accessible applications are run. Generally, only a small number of agent nodes run in this zone. The edge router forwards traffic to applications running in the private zone. These agent nodes have both public and private IP addresses and only specific ports should be open in their iptables firewall.

Security Modes

We can control DC/OS Enterprise access by resource and operation. The available security modes are disabled, permissive, and strict. The strict mode provides the finest-grained controls. The DC/OS permissions are enforced based on your security mode. The security mode is set during DC/OS installation and can only be changed by performing an upgrade.

Disabled:- This mode is designed to ensure smooth upgrades from earlier versions of DC/OS, but only provides minimal security features and is not intended for production environments. The disabled mode does not provide Marathon or Mesos permissions.

Permissive:- This mode provides some of the security features, but does not include the Mesos permissions.

Strict:- This mode provides the most robust security posture and requires a significant amount of configuration.

Authentication

All requests from outside of the DC/OS cluster require an authentication token. The DC/OS authentication token is a JSON web token (JWT) that expires five days after issuance by default. The default expiration can be modified during installation or upgrade. When the authentication token expires, the user can re-authenticate to receive another. DC/OS provisions masters with ZooKeeper credentials during the bootstrap sequence.

User Login

Users can log in by using the DC/OS GUI, the DC/OS CLI, or a programmatic client.

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an open, vendor-neutral, industry standard application protocol for accessing and maintaining distributed directory information services over an Internet Protocol (IP) network. If you have configured an LDAP directory server, DC/OS will pass the user’s credentials to the LDAP directory server for verification.

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) is an open standard for exchanging authentication and authorization data between parties, in particular, between an identity provider and a service provider. OpenID Connect is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol, which allows computing clients to verify the identity of an end-user based on the authentication performed by an authorization server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the end-user in an interoperable and REST-like manner. If you have configured a SAML or an OpenID Connect identity provider (IdP), the user passes their credentials directly to the IdP.

When a user logs in with the DC/OS GUI, the Identity and Access Manager plants a cookie that contains the authentication token. Clearing the cookie does not invalidate the authentication token. If sniffed over an unencrypted connection or extracted from the cookie, someone could use the authentication token to log into DC/OS. Users should Sign Out at the end of their browser session to clear this cookie.

Passwords

Credentials for cluster-local user accounts (those not using LDAP, SAML, or OpenID Connect) consist of a username and password that can be used to validate user passwords. Passwords are individually salted and cryptographically hashed using crypt(3) SHA-512. Once DC/OS Identity and Access Management (IAM) has validated user credentials, an authentication token is returned to the user. The authentication token is then used for further request authentication during the user session. This way the password does not need to be stored in the client and is only sent over the wire immediately after the user enters it.

Authorization

In addition to authenticating requests, DC/OS also checks the permissions associated with the account to determine whether the requestor is authorized to access the requested resource. The sequence in the diagram illustrates how permission enforcement varies by security mode.

The Admin Router and the Secret Store enforce their permissions in all security modes.

Metronome and Marathon enforce their permissions in permissive and strict modes. However, the enforcement in permissive mode only occurs if the requestor presents an authentication token, which is optional in permissive mode. If an in-cluster requestor does not present an authentication token, Metronome and Marathon will act as if the request was made by a user with the dcos:superuser permission.

The Mesos masters and agents enforce their permissions only in strict security mode.

Spaces

Spaces allow you to:

Restrict user access to services and jobs.You can put services and jobs into groups in any security mode. This can help users find the jobs or services that pertain to them. In strict and permissive security modes, you can use permissions to restrict user’s access on a per service/job or service/job group basis.

Restrict service access to secrets. The secret path controls which services can access it. If you do not specify a path when storing a secret, any service can access it. Secret paths work in conjunction with service groups to control access. However, you do not need to have service groups to control access to secrets, you can also use the name of the service.

Secure Storage and Transport of Secrets

DC/OS stores Secret Store data in ZooKeeper encrypted under an unseal key using the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm in Galois Counter Mode (GCM). The Secret Store uses the unseal key to encrypt secrets before sending them to ZooKeeper and to decrypt secrets after receiving them from ZooKeeper. This ensures that secrets are encrypted both at rest and in transit. TLS provides an additional layer of encryption on the secrets in transit from ZooKeeper to the Secret Store.The unseal key is encrypted under a public GPG key. Requests to the Secrets API return only the encrypted unseal key. When the Secret Store becomes sealed, either manually or due to a failure, the private GPG key must be used to decrypt the unseal key and unseal the Secret Store.By default, you cannot store a secret larger than one megabyte.

Fine-grained Access Control of Secrets

DC/OS allows you to restrict:

User access to secrets: use permissions to control which users can access what secrets and what operations they can perform.

Application access to secrets: use spaces to control which applications can retrieve what secrets.

So, above mentioned are some of the security features DC/OS has implemented which has made it secure but more complicated to use for a layman. But in today’s Internet, where the data has become an asset which can be traded on the black market, it’s worth some inconvenience to keep your data safe.

#WordPress

0 notes

aimarketresearch · 30 days ago

Text

Security Assertion Markup Language Authentication Market Size, Share, Key Drivers, Trends, Challenges and Competitive Analysis

Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market - Size, Share, Demand, Industry Trends and Opportunities

Access Full 350 Pages PDF Report @

https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-security-assertion-markup-language-saml-authentication-market

**Segments**

**Market Players**

Highlights of TOC:

Chapter 1: Market overview

Chapter 2: Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market

Chapter 3: Regional analysis of the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market industry

Chapter 4: Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market segmentation based on types and applications

Chapter 5: Revenue analysis based on types and applications

Chapter 6: Market share

Chapter 7: Competitive Landscape

Chapter 8: Drivers, Restraints, Challenges, and Opportunities

Chapter 9: Gross Margin and Price Analysis

Key Questions Answered with this Study

1) What makes Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market feasible for long term investment?

2) Know value chain areas where players can create value?

3) Teritorry that may see steep rise in CAGR & Y-O-Y growth?

4) What geographic region would have better demand for product/services?

5) What opportunity emerging territory would offer to established and new entrants in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

6) Risk side analysis connected with service providers?

7) How influencing factors driving the demand of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication in next few years?

8) What is the impact analysis of various factors in the Global Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market growth?

9) What strategies of big players help them acquire share in mature market?

10) How Technology and Customer-Centric Innovation is bringing big Change in Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) Authentication Market?

Browse Trending Reports:

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 614 591 3140

UK: +44 845 154 9652

APAC : +653 1251 975

Email: [email protected]

#market trends #market research #market share

0 notes

ehteshamuniverse · 5 years ago

Text

Identity as a Service Market Estimated to Lock an Ineffaceable Growth | 18.4% CAGR Through 2024 | COVID-19 Analysis of Identity as a Service Market

Market Highlights

Key Drivers & Barriers

Other factors, such as fast growth in IT infrastructure has given a considerable rise to new vulnerabilities and opportunities to the market, based on which it is witnessing massive growth ways. The cloud-based security solutions and services, such as IDaaS, offer significant advantages, one being cost-effective, and the other offers 24x7 monitoring. Therefore, the rising demand for cloud-based security solutions is motivating the global IDaaS market for the future. Sensing the immense growth potential for the providers of identity-as-a-service in the IoT-driven industrial ecosystem, the market has achieved a lot in the latest years from the previous years and hopes to bring more in the forecast period.

On the contrary, the concerns of businesses regarding data security are limiting the growth of the market. Many enterprises prefer on-premises identity and access management systems as they are more secure, thus becoming a significant challenge for the vendors in the Identity-as-a-Service market.

Segmentation:

The global Identity-as-a-Service market has been analyzed upon various segments such as organization size, service, deployment, and vertical.

Depending on service segment, the global market of IDaaS comprises of access, identity governance & administration, and intelligence.

Depending on organization size segment, the IDaaS market comprises of small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) and large enterprise.

Depending on deployment, the IDaaS market includes public cloud, private cloud, and hybrid.

Regional Framework

Market Players

Related Reports:

https://www.techsite.io/p/1502550

https://www.techsite.io/p/1502569

https://www.techsite.io/p/1502600

https://www.techsite.io/p/1502627

https://www.techsite.io/p/1502651

0 notes

terabitweb · 6 years ago

Text

Original Post from SC Magazine Author: Danny Bradbury

A common theme that runs through successful books and movies is misdirection. Are the good guys really good and the bad guys really bad? Identity is everything. In the real world, you do not want to be the good guy who finds out at the end that your colleague or business partner was actually an imposter. The same holds true for companies storing their data in the cloud. Separating reality from fantasy and security from insecurity are fast becoming the daily fare of CISOs and their cloud security strategies.

Public cloud service providers tout cost savings and flexibility over on-premises data centers, but there is another oft-quoted benefit they pitch enthusiastically: security. Marketers will tell you that cloud services can protect your data and keep you compliant far better than you can do so yourself because it is a core competency for them. But is it? Ultimately, the service provider is responsible for protecting its investment — the infrastructure. In the vast majority of cases, the owner of the data is responsible for security of that data in the cloud, according to the fine print of the terms of service.

the fine print of the terms of service. As a result, a company must go to great efforts to authenticate the users who access its assets properly or risk handing over data to an imposter.

While cloud authentication is a key component of the cloud computing narrative, it is also notoriously difficult to implement, says Paul Simmonds, CEO of the UK-based Global Identity Foundation. He helped create the Jericho Forum in 2004, a global thought leadership group for CISOs, before becoming the global CISO for AstraZeneca and Imperial Chemical Industries Plc in the UK.

The Jericho Forum, now part of The Open Group’s Security Forum, explored how security professionals should react to the erosion of traditional network and organizational boundaries.

One of the biggest problems that the Jericho Forum identified was the “locus of control,” determining if the forces that impact security were internal or external to the organization. Identity and access management (IAM) works well when everyone in the same organization is working on the same systems, says Simmonds.

“If you can all play in the same locus of control – in other words, you play with my identity system in this instance – then you can make it work,” he says. “The instant you step outside this, it all goes to hell in a hand basket.”

That makes cloud authentication difficult because cloud-based services live in their own domains, separate to the customer’s and outside of their control. The customer must send the appropriate authentication information between its own domain and to each of the cloud providers it employs.

There are a few ways to do this, says Simmonds. One approach is to bolt together an on-premises program of your own that manages authentication for many cloud-based services at once.

based services at once. Steve Biswanger, director of information security at Alberta, Canada-based oil and gas company EnCana, began the company’s cloud authentication 15 years ago exploring applications such as health benefits and stock options. “We had different user names and passwords for each one. The users really disliked that,” recalls Biswanger, who is also president of the CISO division at the CIO Association of Canada.

EnCana procured an on-premises single sign-on (SSO) product that kept user credentials in a local database. It authenticated users for multiple applications at once by “credential stuffing” login details into multiple web applications’ login forms. It was a low-tech approach, he recalls.

Providing locally-hosted SSO options seems to be a first step for many organizations. Kim Tracy, now a visiting instructor of computer science at Illinois Wesleyan University, helped put together the cloud authentication system at Northeastern Illinois University (NEIU) where he was CIO until 2015. Like many of his industry colleagues, he was coping with legacy, on-premises applications alongside newer cloud options.

“We had a mix. Some of them were cloud-based, and they were with different providers. That’s one of the things that makes it tough,” he says.

Another complication was the range of users that he had to serve. He had some 12,000 students and approximately 2,000 employees, but there were also prospective students to handle.

“We hosted most of the basic credentials in our own local directories,” says Tracy, adding that his infrastructure supported both Active Directory and LDAP directories to support the different providers’ authentication mechanisms. The directory systems integrated with a locally hosted SSO tool connected to an access portal. The SSO system interacted with each application, cloud or on-prem, using custom integrations. “That’s a real pain to host locally, and it’s a real pain to get enough staff that really understood this stuff. We were always behind; as we lost staff it became even harder to maintain,” he says.

Consolidating in the cloud

Some have taken a different approach to cloud authentication by shifting some of their credential management and authentication capabilities into a single cloud service, enabling it to access other applications inside that cloud service provider’s domain.

Steve Vu, who manages leadership, management and enterprise architecture for a large, enterprise software provider, began his Azure-based authentication project using individual subscription accounts for the service. The company wanted to let employees experiment with the system.

“Then we got an enterprise Azure enrollment that we tied to our Microsoft enterprise software,” he explains. In this arrangement, companies can list various departments within an enterprise enrollment, which in turn can contain different accounts.

“To handle authentication, we tied in Active Directory through our Office 365 service,” Vu says. That allowed users to access Office 365 and Azure via the same account.

The company replicated its on-premises directory with the cloud-based Azure Active Directory, enabling Azure applications to authenticate users directly in the cloud. It also enabled him to mirror the internal roles that his employer had created for its employees into the cloud-based system.

Like Vu’s organization, EnCana migrated much of its functionality to Azure using the service’s own Azure AD system to authenticate its employees with other third-party cloud providers.

“Now I can log into a service or modern SaaS apps using modern authentication techniques,” says Biswanger. “From the user experience perspective it all looks the same, but it’s a lot more resilient.”

This replaces credentialstuffing with more modern authentication protocols that enable machines to speak to each other securely and exchange a richer set of information, and it is an important part of the modern cloud-based authentication process, says Clive Longbottom, founder of UK-based tech advisory firm Quocirca.

“Keep away from simple username/ password pairs: use 2FA (two-factor authentication) tokens, biometrics, whatever,” he says. “Try to use passwords that even the user doesn’t have to know, either through SSO systems

, or via technologies such as OAuth.”

OAuth, managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), is a framework for authenticating and authorizing software to make requests for an application programming interface (API). OAuth essentially enables cloud applications to ask each other for services, and as such can be used for many different online interactions. OAuth works at a relatively low layer of the cloud user-authentication technology stack, and is a platform on which to build other technologies.

One such technology is OpenID. Created by the non-profit OpenID Foundation, OpenID is a vendor-independent authentication system for website owners. Users can get OpenID credentials from various providers.

In an OpenID transaction, a website supporting the standard (the “relying party”) gives a visitor the option to present their OpenID credentials in the form of a URL. The browser directs the user to their identity provider’s website, where they log in.

Optionally, the relying party can ask the identity provider for extra credentials such as name, age, gender or email address. In this scenario, the identity provider allows the user to decide which information they provide.

Once the user has authorized themselves for the relying party via OpenID, they can then return and log in automatically without re-authenticating. OpenID Connect is the latest version of this protocol and is built atop OAuth 2.0. It serves web, mobile and JavaScript-based clients. Consumer-facing websites along with enterprises and government organizations use the technology, which can be extended to support optional features such as encryption and session management.

Another common protocol used in cloud authentication is the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML 2.0). Created by standards body OASIS, the protocol allows two domains to exchange authentication and authorization data with each other.

Based on XML rather than more lightweight dataexchange mechanisms such as REST (Representational State Transfer) and JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), SAML performs broadly the same function as OpenID, but with some important differences.

For example, whereas OpenID refers the relying party to an identity provider, SAML 2.0 exchanges information between domains that already trust each other and have an existing relationship.

Offloading cloud authentication via IDaaS

Some prefer to offload management of ID issues entirely to an external provider. Putting the entire authentication process into the cloud will become common practice, says Raef Meeuwisse, an ISACA governance expert and author of Cybersecurity for Beginners, whose day job is director of cybersecurity and data privacy governance at consulting firm Cyber Simplicity in London.

“Most organizations can’t afford the security expertise and the scale of technologies that they need to be able to run authentication in-house,” he says, pointing to technologies such as multifactor authentication and geo-detection as examples of how technologies are changing.

“Cloud authentication will be the thing that is running most enterprises,” he continues. “Most enterprises will subscribe to one of a few cloud authentication technologies, and that will be the way to go.”

NEIU is a case in point. After his departure, former NEIU CIO Tracy says that the university cut through the whole tangled mess and handed authentication over to an ID-as-a-Service (IDaaS) provider. It was only possible at that point because thirdparty services had evolved to manage identity in the cloud, Tracy argues. He cites not only simplicity but also resilience as a benefit.

“Sometimes our directories or network connectivity would go down. There had to be an ability to log in with cached credentials,” he says. “This cloudbased ID management system could manage the timing between the provisioning of the resources and the change of the password in the directory, so you have fewer of those timing problems where something gets ten minutes behind and (your users) can’t log in.”

A sense of entitlement

Even when shifting some functionality into the cloud, CISOs often find themselves with challenges, one of which involves what GIFs Simmonds calls “entitlements.” It is one thing to authenticate access to a cloud-based application, but it is more complex to tell the application what the user is entitled to do with it. On well-configured software, user privileges will vary by role.

“The challenge is can I pass enough rich information out of my identity system such that the entitlement layer in front of the cloud service is capable of making a rules-based decision?” Simmonds asks. That depends not only on the maturity of the IAM system, but also on the cloud application’s ability to segment functionality based on those user entitlements.

This is a challenge EnCana is still facing. It might have moved some authentication functionality to Azure, but it still uses what he calls a “redirection shim” to authenticate with third-party services that reside outside the Azure cloud. He deals with approximately 70 separate cloud services.

EnCana stores the credentials and the authorization for each third-party, cloudbased application in a shadow account in the third-party cloud service tied to the user’s account in Azure Active Directory. However, when a user’s status and requirements change due to a promotion, transfer, change of job responsibilities or other event, administrators must change their authorization entitlements manually in each cloud application that the user can access. Would it not be more efficient to do this centrally?

“On the surface that would be ideal,” says Biswanger, but he argues that the problem is simply too complex. “Even when we’re doing internal provisioning and I hire somebody, thinking about what they should have access to is a reasonably complex enough bit of work, just for my company.”

Providing a consistent experience among internal and external applications is another common pain point. EnCana has approximately 800 applications running internally on its own premises, aside from the cloud-based applications.

“For anything that’s in the new authentication methods — using OAuth- or SAMLbased authentication with assertion capability — it’s a nice experience. It works on mobile devices, home devices and my corporate desktop,” Biswanger says. “For anything that’s still in my datacenter, sequestered from the Internet that doesn’t support modern authentication, that is now the crappy experience.”

Another problem is managing identities from third-party companies that have partnered with EnCana. A contractor might work for EnCana and for five other companies. All those organizations could use the same cloud-based directory service. One might think all of the systems could all log on to each other’s systems using a single ID, but it typically does not work that way. The contractor company’s employees must maintain multiple sets of credentials — one to access their own employer’s systems and the others to log into each of their customer’s computers.

“We need some mechanism by which when you work for an outsourcing company, my company trusts the outsourcing company, and we only have to manage (one) identity there,” Biswanger says.

He is describing federated identity, which as a concept has been around for 15 years or more. It is a difficult concept to implement, says Simmonds, and one problem is managing transitive trust.

For one thing, Company A might trust Company B, and Company B might trust company C. Does that mean Company A can trust Company C? Then, what if Company D joins?

“It’s what Jericho referred to as the n factorial problem — once you get to n>3, it doesn’t work,” says Simmonds. “You need a huge amount of independent oversight to make it possible.”

These cross-domain challenges are among the many reasons to err on the side of caution when providing access to cloud applications, the experts warn.

“Make sure that privileged access is provided to as few people as possible and even where it is provided, try to ensure that those users still do not have read/write activity to data that they should not see,” says Longbottom. “Ensure that the means of access are not shared. It has to be a case that any action can be drilled right down to a specific individual.”

Jeff Spivey, past board director of ISACA and CEO of Charlotte-based security consulting firm Security Risk Management Inc., highlights governance as a key talking point when creating cloud-based authentication products.

“From day one, audit must be involved in the whole process to ensure that whatever is being constructed in the cloud is acceptable to the auditors and executive management and the board of directors that own all of this,” he says. Companies must decide the level of authentication necessary based on the sensitivity of the cloud-based data that a user is accessing.

How can companies factor that level of governance and risk-based policy into their cloud authentication strategies?

At EnCana, Biswanger is implementing a virtual identity management layer to help with this issue. The on-premises software will abstract the identity information from Azure and other identity data sources in the organization, providing a more functional front-end interface that applies locally defined policies and business logic to the authorization process.

“The dream there is that (it) allows me to log in based on context and get different access,” he says. “I can apply those rules at authentication time. It’s putting a lot more smarts at that identity layer.”

Cloud authentication might be difficult, but it is an important part of the cloud computing story, and organizations should have both the human resources and the budget to tackle it. An option is to use a third-party service provider to manage it if the company cannot. It presents part of the often-unacknowledged overhead associated with cloud security.

Allocate 10 percent of the savings you expect from a cloud computing strategy and commit that to security management, advises Simmonds. Cloud authentication will be a part of that budget. He recommends that companies do the same for service management. Suddenly, those return on investment figures might look less promising, but they will also be a lot more realistic.

The post Who goes there? appeared first on SC Media.

Go to Source Author: Danny Bradbury Who goes there? Original Post from SC Magazine Author: Danny Bradbury A common theme that runs through successful books and movies…

#SC Magazine

0 notes