Tumgik
#The people vs muhammad reddit
freewisconsin · 2 years
Text
The people vs muhammad reddit
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The teacher had discussed the subject with his class after the magazine Charlie Hebdo republished drawings of Prophet Muhammad to coincide with a trial linked to the deadly attack on its journalists in 2015. The French Council of the Muslim Faith (CFCM) - the main intermediary between the religion and the government - has since promised its own plan to fight radicalisation, to include a training programme for imams.Īfter Samuel Paty's brutal killing, Emmanuel Macron defended freedom of expression: "We will not give up caricatures and drawings, even if others back away", he said, calling for an end to hatred and violence and for respect for others. He calls on Macron to lead France "in providing Muslims with the same safeguards it extends to other communities". In a column for Euronews, Pakistan minister Syed Zulfi Bukhari - also an adviser to Prime Minister Imran Khan - argues the caricatures are not satire but similar to the "dehumanisation. The French president's remarks drew fire from Turkey's President Erdogan - who slammed "rising Islamophobia in the West" and called for a boycott of French products - as well as protests across the Muslim world from Pakistan to Syria, Bangladesh to Gaza. Macron's comments came at the end of a week in which three people were stabbed to death in a Catholic church in Nice by a Tunisian man, and a security guard at a French consulate in Saudi Arabia was wounded by a man with a knife.īefore these events, he had sparked controversy over his defence of freedom of expression and attack on "radical Islam" and "Islamist separatism" in the wake of Samuel Paty's beheading.
Tumblr media
France: President Macron says he understands Muslim shock over Prophet cartoons.
Tumblr media
0 notes
"Why did the Mongols invade most of the Old World?"
A write up I did on Reddit for a question: "what caused the Mongols to invade most of the Old World?"
It was almost accidental. At no point when he began uniting the Mongol tribes did Chinggis Khan (the more accurate rendition of Genghis Khan) seek out world domination. Rather, it sort of kept happening.
What people don't realize is that Chinggis Khan didn't succeed in uniting the Mongols until he was about 50, declaring the Mongol Empire in 1206 (he was born in 1162 as Temujin, and it wasn't until 1206 when he began being called Chinggis). That was many decades of slow warfare and his own losses and defeats before he succeeded in doing so. Initially he was probably concerned only in securing his own position and safety, perhaps at best hoping for leadership of his own tribe. Events went differently, and a 'concerned citizens' alliance of steppe notables unhappy with Temujin's rise (such as appointing his generals and chief lieutenants from common folk based on their ability, rather than old bloodlines) turned the conflict into a massive civil war for control of Mongolia. By this time this was complete, Temujin had restructure Mongolian society, breaking the power of tribal Khans and old tribal ties, placing himself, the Great Khan, at the head, with discipline and utter loyalty the byword, harnessing the great military potential of the steppe horse archer.
By 1206 then he had a fierce military force, a great spear: but had almost run out of enemies in Mongolia itself. All dressed up and nowhere to go, you might say. What Chinggis Khan understood was that he needed a common enemy, or old internal intrigues would rise back up to the surface and tear his new union apart. The spear needed to be thrown, lest it fall apart. The obvious answer lay to the south, the kingdoms of northern China, the Tangut Xi Xia in modern Gansu/Ningxia, and the Jurchen Jin Dynasty controlling from Manchuria to the Huai River, capital at Zhongdu (modern Beijing). Whether Chinggis at this stage was intending to conquer them, or attack and raid is hard to say. Personally, his actions to me suggest the latter, but some argue for the former. There certainly were pretexts to attack both. The Tangut had allowed certain enemies of Chinggis to flee through their territory or seek shelter, and the Jin had long been enemies of the Mongols, breaking up an earlier Mongol union (commonly called the Khamag Mongol confederation) in the early 12th century. While there certainly was this pretext, it should also be noted that a quite dry period in late 12th century Mongolia, and continuous warfare, had depleted the herds the Mongols relied on to survive as well as cost them in other goods. The raids, especially against the Xi Xia, may have just been out of need to replenish these stocks. Part of this too may have been encouraged by both states entering into a period of instability and poor emperors: as good an opportunity as any for the Mongols to attack. If they had aspirations beyond this, I don't think we can say, and it seems highly unlikely to me. Chinggis Khan's intentions here seem very localized.
In 1209 the Mongols invaded the Tangut Kingdom, making off with a great quantity of goods and forcing the Tangut King to submit to them (which entailed him sending a massive amount of tribute and slaves). Not long after his return from the Xi Xia, the Jin Emperor demanded the submission of Chinggis Khan (Temujin had undertaken a formal vassalization to the Jin in the past, and the Jin may have been surprised by his sudden unification of the steppes and understandably worried, but were distracted by war with the Chinese Song Dynasty to the south), who insulted the envoys and used this as his official declaration of war, invading the Jin Empire in 1211.
I think what turned Chinggis' mind to more permanent conquest than he initially intended was the success the Mongols had. While sieges were difficult, but aided by Jin defectors providing them siege weapons and knowledge, Chinggis Khan's army absolutely devastated in almost every field encounter. Though the Jin had mighty horsemen and huge numbers, they were unable to gain local superiority of forces and suffered from defections after defections. Within a few years, there were more Chinese fighting for the Mongols against the Jin that there were Mongols there!
By 1215, Zhongdu had fallen (with some difficulty), and forced the Jin Emperor to supply tribute and Chinggis withdrew back to Mongolia, but when the Emperor soon broke this agreement by fleeing to Kaifeng, war resumed. Was Chinggis intending a conquest of all of China now? Well, still it is not quite clear whether his intentions were to force the Jin to submit, fully conquer them or take all of China. I personally have seen no evidence he desired all of China yet, and the Jin were still a major obstacle. I think his intentions did not go much beyond forcing the Jin to be his vassal.
While in Mongolia in 1216, Chinggis sent some forces to bring rebellious tribes in Siberia and the steppe west of Mongolia to heel, as well as hunt down a son of a defeated enemy, Kuchlug, who had usurped power in the Qara-Khitai empire (parts of western Xinjiang/Kazakhstan). This was a major concern as Chinggis feared Kuchlug could use this as a staging ground to invade Mongolia, and when Kuchlug attacked and killed a Mongol vassal at Almaliq, sent his general Jebe to bring Kuchlug to heel. Chinggis had actually overestimated how secure Kuchlug's rule was though, as it turns out Kuchlug was greatly hated. Kuchlug's empire dissolved and submitted to Jebe as he passed through, and Kuchlug was finally hunted down in Badakhshan. In a flash, the Mongol Empire had greatly and unexpectedly expanded to the west: intended to finally capture a dangerous enemy, they had ended up incorporating a huge swath of new territory, making them neighbours with the also expansionist Khwarezmian Empire, which ruled from Transoxania through Persia.
Chinggis' initial contacts with Khwarezm were though, entirely trade focused. He sent envoys and merchants to establish trade links with the Khwarezm-Shah, Muhammad: together, their two empires could have secured a significant amount of the trade in and out of China, providing a safe route between both states. I want to really emphasis this: Chinggis Khan's first contacts with a state not immediately adjacent to Mongolia or encountered in Northern China were to encourage trade, wholly economic. Nothing suggests at this initial stage Chinggis intended to conquer or attack Khwarezm.
Of course, we know things didn't go quite so smoothly: I have a video providing overview here: https://youtu.be/0ct-dz_ad4k. Basically, a large trade caravan sent by Chinggis was betrayed and murdered by the governor of the frontier city of Otrar (the Khwarezm-shah's uncle). But even after this, do you know what Chinggis Khan did? He sent a group of envoys to find out why this had occurred, and give the Khwarezm-shah a chance to make recompense. Even after such a heinous assault, Chinggis Khan did not want to uproot his armies and move west, and still gave the Shah a chance to encourage trade. When the Shah insulted and killed these envoys, that was what finally brought Chinggis Khan to, perhaps reluctantly, invade the Khwarezmian Empire.
It seems Chinggis Khan greatly overestimated the Khwarezmians. On paper, they had immense military potential, and Chinggis Khan being unfamiliar with the Qara-Khitai realm he had now incorporated, may have been unaware had difficult it would have been for the Khwarezmians to mount an offensive towards Mongol territory. There had also been a brief engagement between Mongol (under Chinggis' son Jochi and the famed Subutai) and Khwarezmian forces in similar time to this, while the Mongols had been pursuing fleeing Merkit seeking shelter among the Qipchaq. What had not been apparent was how politically fragile the Khwarezmian Empire was, how most of its territory was only newly acquired, the ethnic tensions (Turkic garrisons and commanders vs Persianized populations) which hampered cooperation and how the over-confident Khwarezm-Shah Muhammad was simply not up to the task at hand. When Chinggis Khan's armies entered the Khwarezmian Empire at the end of 1219 (leaving a holding force in China under the commander Mukhali to keep up pressure there), the Khwarezm-Shah fled, leaving each city to fend for itself. Totally unexpectedly, but from late 1219 to the end of 1221, the Khwarezmian Empire utterly dissolved under a ferocious Mongol onslaught. Notable resistance came from a few individuals, like the Shah's son, the brave Jalal al-Din Mingburnu, but it must have been an absolute shock to the Mongols how total their victory was. It is here it seems the belief in Mongol world domination must have truly emerged. Basically, to paraphrase historian David Morgan, the Mongols came to believe they were destined to conquer the world when they realized that they were in fact, doing so. For how else could you have explained such a dramatic victory?
The Khwarezmian campaign laid the foundations for further Mongol campaigns in the west: during that campaign, Jebe and Subutai went on a phenomenal campaign through the Caucasus and into southern Russia, defeating a Rus'-Qipchaq force at the Kalka River in May 1223, bringing to the Mongols knowledge of the western steppe and to Subutai, a personal interest to return there. Continued campaigns to conquer and consolidate the remnants of the Khwarezmian realm brought the Mongols deeper into Persia and Iraq. In China, the brief respite allowed the Jin dynasty to hold on until 1234, which brought the Mongols into contact with the Southern Song Dynasty and their own eventual wars there.
The vast scale of the Mongol conquests was not something intended from the outset, but a staggered development, and as more and more of Asia came under their banner, the Mongols would become much more proactive in the spread of their rule.
Sources:
Allsen, Thomas T. “Mongolian Princes and Their Merchant Partners, 1200-1260.” Asia Major 2 no.2 (1989): 83-126.
Atwood, Christopher. “Jochi and the Early Campaigns.” in How Mongolia Matters: War, Law, and Society, edited by Morris Rossabi. Brill's Inner Asian Library, (2017) 35-56.
Barthold, W. Turkestan Down to the Mongol Invasion. Translated by H.A.R. Gibb. London: Oxford University Press, 1928. https://archive.org/details/Barthold1928Turkestan/page/n341
Biran, Michal. The Empire of Qara-Khitai in Eurasian History: between China and the Islamic World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Buell, Paul D. “Early Mongol Expansion in Western Siberia and Turkestan (1207-1219): a Reconstruction.” Central Asiatic Journal 36 no. ½ (1992): 1-32.
Golden, Peter B. “Inner Asia c. 1200,” in The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: The Chinggisid Age, edited by Nicola Di Cosmo, Allen J. Frank and Peter B. Golden, 9-25. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Jackson, Peter. The Mongols and the Islamic World: From Conquest to Conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.
May, Timothy. The Mongol Empire. Edinburgh History of the Islamic Empires Series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
Sinor, Denis. “The Mongols in the West.” Journal of Asian History, 33 no. 1 (1999): 1-44.
Timokhin, Dmitry. “The Conquest of Khwarezm by Mongol Troops (1219-1221).” in The Golden Horde in World History, 75-86. Tartaria Magna Series. Kazan: Sh. Marjani Institute of History of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, 2017.
Timokhin, Dmitry, and Vladimir Tishin. “Khwarezm, the Eastern Kipchaks and Volga Bulgaria in the Late 12-early 13th Centuries,” in The Golden Horde in World History, 25-40. Tartaria Magna Series. Kazan: Sh. Marjani Institute of History of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, 2017
22 notes · View notes
maximuswolf · 4 years
Text
What are your thoughts about so many Young Muslims in the west being so left leaning? via /r/islam
What are your thoughts about so many Young Muslims in the west being so left leaning?
I don’t like the Republican Party, as it has become a safe haven for bigots and racists for a while now. But something has to be said for the role of being a Conservative in Islam. Many of the things we try to uphold in our religious societies are by their very nature conservative. Unfortunately, either for sinister reasons or otherwise, being a conservative is now being linked to being anti-Islam and racism.
So that has pushed many people to the left. To me this is sad, and it’s an example of something saying very nice things to make you do very bad things (sounds familiar, no?). For example, as crazy as the republicans have been, to my knowledge they’ve never pushed an agenda that for example would expose or even encourage my children to sin. Most of their inflammatory actions came in the form of politics and even xenophobia- but that’s nothing new for Muslims.
Yet, the “good side” are the ones that promote things that are clearly and socially abhorrent. I mean of the many stories God chose to reiterate and confirm from the New Testament/Torat, the story of Lut/Lot pbuh is one of the most fleshed out. Yet, just because this side of the secular world is nice to us, and puts us in commercials, we silently or even vocally agree to their agenda.
And also, the prophet Muhammad’s pbuh greatest warning (a warning that he claimed every other prophet before him - hundreds and thousands of them - received) was about a man that will bring unlimited personal freedom, a paradise on earth to do whatever you want, no sins at all, but simply calling him God (audubillah).
It’s ironic that the side we’re supposed to “dislike” are more likely to want the same type of society we as Muslims are ordered to create, whereas our “allies” consistently remind others how barbaric our Islamic societies, and similarly conservative societies, are and want to create the society that we are warned of.
I just want to know why. Are politics and people (facetiously - because we all know what they think of religion, especially ours) being nice to us worth slowly supporting a world that will eventually have us make a choice between being an actual submissive Muslim vs a simple cultural mascot?
No hate, just knowledge and discussion.
Thank you. Salaam.
Submitted February 20, 2021 at 07:47AM by Onetimehelper via reddit https://ift.tt/37sFamz
0 notes
savetopnow · 7 years
Text
2018-03-21 00 SPORTS now
SPORTS
Barstool Sports
Girl Scouts Change Their Rules And Make It Okay To Sell Girl Scout Cookies In Front Of Weed Dispensaries
College Baseball Announcer Becomes Befuddled While Reading A Pitcher’s Bio Filled With Always Sunny Quotes
Rory McIlroy Announces Tiger Woods Is The Undisputed Greatest Player Of All Time
Is It Acceptable For Some Strange Lady To Take A Selfie With My Dogs Without Permission?
Michael Rapaport gives an inspirational Slam Dunk contest speech and his NBA mid-season awards
Deadspin
Slightly Defective Museum Cat Clearly The Animal To Beat In Predicting The World Cup
Nothing Can Stop Ronaldo From Realizing His Dream Of Scoring Loads Of Goals
Joe Thomas Roasted Everyone During His Retirement Press Conference
Some Cool Highlights From The Knicks' 18-Point Win
Gizmodo What You Need to Know About Stephen Hawking’s Final Physics Paper | Jalopnik Cargo Ship Cras
ESPN
Vincent confirms likely changes to catch rule
Inside the mask: An umpire crew chief on mound visits, mad managers and having your call overturned
Way-too-early MLB trade deadline preview: Which buyers should be all-in?
The million dollar program that keeps LeBron going strong in year 15
Need a new team to root for? We got you
FiveThirtyEight Sports
It’s Never Too Early For Gregg Popovich To Call A Timeout
Beside The Points For Monday, March 19, 2018
This Year’s Sweet 16 Is Downright Odd
How UMBC Did The Unthinkable — And The Inevitable
Can Anyone Knock UConn Out This Year?
Reddit Sports
Creativity points...and a yellow card for Kyle Lafferty.
Muhammad Ali boxing underwater, 1961. Ali was 19 here and didn't know how to swim.
Floyd Mayweather Jr wants to purchase Newcastle United, sign Cristiano Ronaldo
Lebron james vs giannis antetokounmpo: no contest as the king dominates greek freak
China Sports Minister pledges to qualify for all 102 events at the Beijing Winter Olympics: Gou Zhongwen makes the pledge at the National People’s Congress in Beijing as the capital prepares to become the first city to host both the Summer and Winter Games.
SB Nation
What was ‘The Ultimate Deletion’ and why is everyone talking about it?
StarCom Racing replaces Jeffrey Earnhardt with Landon Cassill
Ole Miss basketball coach Kermit Davis says his team will ‘respect the flag’
The best remaining NFL free agents
Marcus Davenport balled out at UTSA, and he’s going to do the same in the NFL
Sports Illustrated
How Giancarlo Stanton Negotiated His Way to the Yankees to Create Baseball's Scariest Lineup
FOTOS | Adidas presenta la segunda equipación de la Seleccion Española para el Mundial
Journalist Claims There Is 'No Way' Liverpool Star Will Leave This Summer & Will Sign New Deal
Former Crystal Palace Striker Ian Wright Insists Selhurst Park Is the Right Place for Wilfried Zaha
El gran elogio que le dedicó Ronaldinho a Leo Messi: "Solo queda mirarlo y..."
The Ringer
The Crypto Coworking Spaces Have Arrived
An Exploration of Jared Dunn’s Bizarre Childhood
Extorting John Skipper, the New Power of Cable News, and March Media Madness
The State of Izzo, Legacies at Stake, and Sister Jean’s Reign
If You Had One Shot (or Game or Season or Series … )
Yahoo! Sports
Kurtenbach: The Warriors’ shorthanded loss to the Spurs is an opportunity to reflect
Early winners and losers of Patriots free agency
LaMarcus Aldridge takes over as Spurs top Warriors after Draymond Green suffers groin injury
Joe Thomas cracks jokes at Cleveland Browns' expense during retirement press conference
Ronald Acuña getting sent down offers more proof the system needs to change
0 notes