#XR-4 Focal Edition
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Varjo XR-4系列:4K x 4K配上雙 2000 萬像素相機引領未來的沉浸式體驗
隨著科技的不斷進步,Varjo日前正式發佈了全新的XR-4系列頭戴顯示器帶來了全新的虛擬實境體驗。這系列的頭戴式顯示器(HMD)具備先進的技術規格,包括擁有4K x 4K、200 尼特迷你 LED 顯示器和 96% DCI-P3 色彩空間、3840 x 3744解析度的高清顯示屏,120°x105°的超廣角視野,20 MP的透視攝像頭以及透過雙 2000 萬像素相機在 XR 中複製真實的人類視覺,提供高達 51 PPD 的通過率和世界上第一個凝視驅動的 XR…
View On WordPress
#虛擬實境#虛擬實境資訊#虛擬實境新聞#nr headset#Varjo#Varjo XR-4#vr#vr headset#vr news#vr news today#XR#XR headset#XR-4#XR-4 Focal Edition#XR-4 Secure Edition
0 notes
Text
Price: [price_with_discount] (as of [price_update_date] - Details) [ad_1] From the manufacturer Newly developed 33.0‑MP back-illuminated CMOS image sensor The full-frame Exmor R CMOS sensor delivers outstanding speed and superb image quality. The use of copper wiring contributes to higher transmission speeds and faster AD conversion, while fast sensor readout enables 10-bit 4:2:2 4K recording at up to 60p. The sensor also provides improved colour reproducibility, low-noise performance at all sensitivities, 15-stop dynamic range on stills, and increased AF precision and focal stability. BIONZ XR image processor for up to 8x processing speed The BIONZ XR engine, also used in the flagship α1 and α7S III models, provides up to an 8x increase in processing speed. The engine concentrates real-time processing of AF, image recognition, and image quality adjustment to minimise processing latency, for greatly increased movie and still processing power. User interface, network, and file management processing is distributed in order to deliver fast response regardless of real-time processing load. 4K 60p recording, 4:2:2 10-bit recording The α7 IV gives you an impressive range of video recording options. Full pixel readout without binning allows 4K 60p recording, and when recording 4K movies at 30p, full-frame 7K oversampling produces high-resolution, highly detailed 4K. 10-bit 4:2:2 video can be recorded internally, allowing fuller, more natural gradations and greater editing freedom. The XAVC HS file format provides roughly twice the coding efficiency of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264. Beautiful colour expression made simple, with S-Cinetone The α7 IV supports S-Cinetone, based on expertise gained through development of the VENICE CineAlta camera. This look is responsible for the beautiful skin tones for which Cinema Line cameras like the FX9, FX6, and FX3 are widely acclaimed. It delivers natural mid-tones for healthy-looking skin colour, plus soft colours and gorgeous highlights. Because
it's in-camera, it's easy to create a more expressive look for your movie imagery without post-editing. WEEBILL-S comes with the newest motor units and upgraded high-precision algorithm. WEEBILL-S easily handles mainstream mirrorless and DSLR camera & lens combos with top-notch performance. Unleashing boundless possibilities with WEEBILL-S! Two-in-One Quick Release System WEEBILL-S adopts the popular two-in-one quick release plates (Manfrotto/Arca-Swiss), allowing easy setup and fast transition between equipment without re-balancing. Inherited Ergonomic Design Compact as a piece of A4 paper. The ergonomic Sling design provides an effortless shooting experience as always. Upgraded Image Transmission Module (Accessory) With 1080P 30fps ultra-low latency transmission (100-meter distance), professional monitoring and livestreaming can be easily achieved. Up to 3 Devices Sync Motion When mounted with image transmission receiver and transmitter(accessory), up to 3 devices can be connected to your stabilizer, including smartphones, iPads and monitors. Product 1: 4K 60p Video Product 1: Up to 10 fps Shooting, ISO 100-51200 Product 1: 759 AF Points (Wide AF Coverage) Product 2: Supreme Power. Superior Compatibility: WEEBILL-S comes with new motor units and an upgraded high-precision algorithm, with 300% improvement in motor torque and 50% increase in responsiveness. Combos like Sony A7Ⅲ+FE 24-70mm F2.8 and Canon 5D4+EF 24-70mm F2.8 can be perfectly balanced and stabilized on WEEBILL-S for smooth cinematic shots under different scenarios. Simply mount your camera onto WEEBILL-S and WEEBILL-S can auto tune its power to best adapt to your devices. Product 2: Lightweight & Compact: Weight as light as 895g, the unique structure and minimum design of WEEBILL-S make it super compact as a piece of A4 paper. With the ergonomically designed Sling mode, WEEBILL-S provides an effortless shooting experience for anyone.
Product 2: Always on Focus: WEEBILL-S supports mechanical focus/zoom control through a handy control wheel on its body. Whatever camera & lens combo you're using, you can always pull focus or zoom precisely via the included cable and a servo motor. Product 2: OLED Display for Instant Gimbal Settings: The all-inclusive intuitive OLED display can show various adjusted parameters like motor strength, follow speed, smoothness, deadband, key customization and etc, all of which can be directly controlled via the handle without having to enter the App. [ad_2]
0 notes
Text
$200 vs $4,000 Camera: Is Your Phone Good Enough for Travel Photography?
Sensor image quality has advanced so much over the last few years that phone manufacturers are boasting photographs that rival those from larger mirrorless and DSLR cameras. Some, like the Xiaomi Mi CC9 at 108 megapixels, quadruple the resolution of my best camera.
The iPhone 11 Pro and Google Pixel 4 have incredible night mode capabilities using imaging algorithm and stabilization that’s comparable to the high ISO capabilities of my Sony Alpha. Most of them shoot 4K video at 60 FPS. Between using Filmic Pro for film and Snapseed for photos, I have more options than ever with what tools I choose to shoot with.
And that’s just it. Options.
As a photographer and filmmaker, I don’t feel anxious that phones are allowing more people to produce footage that is comparable to my bigger and more expensive set-ups. In fact, I feel better knowing that on days in which I don’t feel like lugging my gear around or even taking my camera out to capture some food photography, I have the option of producing something that is high quality and sometimes indistinguishable from the images coming out of my Sony a7 III.
Comparing iPhone 7 Vs Sony a7S II Images
And I want to prove that using two photographs I took using my Sony a7S II and iPhone 7 (both are 12-megapixel cameras, both a few years old) a couple of years back in the Lofoten Islands of Norway. At the time, I didn’t plan on doing a comparison — I just happened to take the image first on my phone before pulling out my camera to get the shot with a slower exposure.
While resorting through my images recently, I came across the two images side by side when I did a batch edit and noticed that they came out differently (JPEGs don’t respond to the same changes as RAW files). Out of curiosity, I spent about 5 minutes to see if I could make the images similar.
The results were interesting. In fact, they were getting so close than I spent another 5 minutes to spot edit a few things to see if I can make them indistinguishable.
Here are the two photos:
How long did it take you to figure out which was shot on the iPhone 7 and which was shot on the Sony a7S II? How did you figure it out and are you correct? I’ll reveal the answer a few paragraphs down.
Did I Edit The Images?
Quite a bit. The process of creating a photograph is different for everyone and has only ever been limited by the tools that we have access to, whether be it in a physical darkroom or today in Adobe’s Lightroom (and Photoshop). Personally, I do most of my image editing in Lightroom. It’s fast, allows me to do most of the manipulation I want, and I can batch edit a bunch of similar images.
For these two images, I played around quite a bit with the white balance temperature, colors, exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, curves, clarity, texture, and dehaze. The Sony a7S II image was slightly wider at 24mm on a full-frame sensor, so I cropped it some to match the iPhone’s field of view and I cropped the iPhone into a 2×3 aspect ratio to match with the Sony image.
Below are the edited images next to their originals.
Comparison With The Original Images
In the Sony a7S II original, you can more details in the cloud and the overall colors, tone, and contrast of the image are different from the edited version. I shot this with the Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM lens at .8 sec shutter speed, f/22, and ISO 100. The slightly slower shutter speed allows me to blur the movements of water just a bit. I was kicking myself for not bringing any graduated or ND filters to allow me to shoot even slower than this and to retain the details in the cloud.
In the iPhone 7 version, the first noticeable difference was the completely blown highlights in the cloud. The phone camera also exposed it a bit darker and warmer than a7S II. Other than that, the details are very similar and, in fact, the overall image is sharper than the Sony a7S II because there was some accidental motion micro-shake with the a7S II. The iPhone image was taken at 1/120 sec, f/1.8, and ISO 20.
For both, I added a gradient filter from the top down over the mountains to blow out all the clouds completely and went negative on the dehaze and clarity to add a soft glow to the top of the mountains. This effect ultimately hid the shortcomings of the iPhone sensor with not being able to capture the same dynamic range that a Sony RAW file can.
Below are two cropped views to give you a sense of detail.
iPhone 7 Sony a7S II
Like I mentioned earlier, shooting at .8 sec on a travel tripod standing on a windy bridge created some unwanted shake in the a7S II image. On the iPhone image, the detail is pretty sharp, and sometimes almost too sharp for me. To compensate for that, I dialed down the texture a bit to de-sharpen the image.
You can click here for the iPhone and here for the Sony to download higher resolution versions of the two images for pixel peeping if that’s your thing.
So did you guess correctly above? The a7S II was the first (top) one. Congratulations if you guessed it right. For me, it’s still hard when I look at them side by side, but the giveaway would have been the blurred movement in the water from the slower exposure.
Is Your Phone Good Enough For Travel Photography?
The short answer is yes. With careful composition and exposure, you can take spectacular photographs with your phone. With all the new phones sporting multiple cameras and crazy imaging algorithms to produce some high-quality images, you have a lot more features at your disposal with the device that you’ll always have on you.
With the iPhone 11 Pro, you can even get some beautiful portraits with some nice optically-produced bokeh at a tighter focal length. For landscapes, you can throw on a wide adapter and match the super-wide field of view of my widest camera lens. Even without it, you’re getting a pretty wide image.
With the Snapseed and Lightroom app on your mobile OS, you can edit images even quicker than on your laptop/desktop software. It’s crazy how fast I can create an image out of Snapseed and send/share it right away. I’m finding myself content with shooting on my iPhone a lot more than I was in the past. Even when I’m not, sometimes I’ll send the images from my camera to my phone and do an edit there for social media instead of waiting to load it onto my computer.
Ultimately, as far as photographs go, I believe the content of a good, compelling image will outweigh its technical specs, always. As a photographer and archivist, I want to have the best quality that I can get. When it comes to sharing, most content is consumed on mobile devices where you can hardly appreciate the qualities of a 50-megapixel camera. You probably can’t tell the difference between a 24- and 12-megapixel camera because of the relatively low image sizes that are uploaded and further compressed before viewing.
In other words, as long as an image looks good, most people won’t care about the megapixel count or even what camera it was taken with.
As far as video, which I will go into detail in a separate post, most cameras now shoot 4K 60 FPS, which will allow you to create some beautiful slow-motion footage. Using the Filmic Pro app, I have more control over my settings and have used footage shot from my phone mixed in with my a7S II footage.
The answer is basically yes, you can use your phone for travel photography.
Is The End Near For Professional Cameras?
Absolutely not. While I used this example to illustrate what you can do with a camera phone image (and not even the latest iPhone which is far better than the iPhone 7 camera), a lot of post-processing and artistic intent went into the final image. With the a7S II, I was able to shoot at a wider angle that I preferred (and even wider if I put on my 16-35mm lens). The built-in cameras are still limited in what focal lengths you can shoot with (although with all the triple and quad camera systems, that might change soon).
Mirrorless and DSLR cameras will, for the most part, still produce better images out of the camera than your phone, and allow you more flexibility with interchangeable lenses. For images with more shallow depth of field, the bokeh created digitally is currently not as good as the optical bokeh you get from different lenses. I will almost always shoot with my camera if I want to shoot portraits.
I also prefer the RAW images that come out of my cameras, which gives me more latitude to make fine adjustments. I’ve seen some amazing edits and composites from artists using JPEG images, so I’m not saying it’s not possible, but it’s just a little easier for me to have more data and detail to work with in my edit.
Ultimately, both my Sony (currently a7 III) camera and iPhone (currently XR) are tools, and I always process the images to create a final image that I envision and want to share. Learning your tools is the best way to get the most of your images and constantly relearning is the only way I’ve found to get better and not get stale.
These are all personal preferences, so how you look at it might be different, but it’s certainly interesting for me to see how far camera phone images have come since I first took a photo with my Sony Clie UX-50 PDA.
About the author: Kien Lam is an international photographer and filmmaker based in San Francisco. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. He runs whereandwander.com and believes in living for those moments that make the best stories, told or untold. He is working through his bucket list and wants to help others do the same. You can find more of his photos on Instagram. This article was also published here.
Read more about this at petapixel.com
https://coolarticlespinner.com/200-vs-4000-camera-is-your-phone-good-enough-for-travel-photography/
0 notes
Text
Looking to Up Your Insta Game? Here’s How to Nail an Instagram Video
Wondering how to take high quality Instagram videos that will impress even your toughest critics? Turns out it’s not as difficult to create an influencer-worthy video as it may sound. We consulted some bona fide experts: influencers Sam and Cailli Beckerman (@beckermanblog), Elise Purdon (@apoelise), and Sasha Exeter (@sashaexeter) to find out the strategies they use to rack up the likes. Here are their top four suggestions.
(1) Shoot in 4k
Both Elise and Sasha recommended you film in 4k if you really want to make your Instagram video come to life. Sasha broke it down by explaining how she manually sets her video quality to 4k 60 fps (frames per second) instead of the standard 1080 HD at 30 fps. “It not only makes the footage smoother, but the resolution is higher,” she says.
How to: Open up iPhone settings, choose “camera,” then “record video,” and change to “4k at 60 fps.”
View this post on Instagram
SWIMMING WITH THE SEA DOGGOS 💦 🐶 🐠 I hope they make you smile too. 🤗💛😁 Watch until the end cause this one lil pup was trying so hard to play fetch with me and some seaweed. 💁🏼♀️🤙🏻😎 #shotoniphone —-> don’t know HOW I didn’t drop my phone 🤣
A post shared by A PIECE OF ELISE (@apoelise) on May 13, 2019 at 10:40am PDT
(2) Be Aware of Lighting
Sasha is always very conscious of lighting when shooting. “I always make sure I am filming outdoors during daylight or I have a ton of natural light flowing indoors. A well lit space is the best way to help improve your video content,” she says. AE/AF (auto focus/auto exposure) lock is a great tool that Sasha and Elise both use. However when lighting isn’t great, Elise sometimes falls back on third party apps where it’s possible to fix overexposed or dark shots.
How to: Tap and hold on the focal point of your shot until you see an AE/AF banner appear, tap the shutter button to take the photo.
View this post on Instagram
CROCHET BACK SPORTS BRA IN CERULEAN BLUE https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Crochet-Back-Sports-Bra/p/WS9A440151_4670 CROCHET BACK SPORTS BRA MULTI-COLOUR https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Crochet-Back-Sports-Bra/p/WS9A440151_1000 MESH CROP LEGGINGS IN CERULEAN BLUE https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Mesh-Crop-Leggings/p/WS9A450175_4670 PRINTED BIKER SHORTS https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Print-Shorts/p/WS9A450160_1000 MESH PRINTED CROP LEGGINGS IN MULTICOLOUR https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Print-Crop-Leggings/p/WS9A450099_1000 MESH PRINTED LEGGINGS IN PINK https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Mesh-Crop-Leggings/p/WS9A450175_5200 MESH TRIM TANK https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Mesh-Trim-Tank/p/WS9A440138_1000 TENNIS SKIRT https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Sport-Skort/p/WS9A450162_1000 ZIP UP MESH HOODIE https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Outerwear/Zip-Up-Hoodie/p/WS9A460060_0053 LONG ATHLEISURE SHORTS https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Long-Shorts/p/WS9A450115_1000 BLACK BIKER SHORTS https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Bike-Shorts/p/WS9A450121_0053 MESH ACTIVE SWEATSHIRT https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Outerwear/Mesh-Active-Jacket/p/WS9A460054_1000 NEON RIBBED TANK TOP https://www.joefresh.com/ca/Categories/Women/Women's-Activewear/Ribbed-Tank/p/WS9A440175_3280
A post shared by SoSasha (@sashaexeter) on Jul 4, 2019 at 3:52pm PDT
(3) Make Sure the Content is Digestible
Sam and Cailli Beckerman were adamant that Instagram videos should be short and easy to digest. That way, the video itself will be easier to edit and the content will appeal to more viewers. “Get a tripod. For videos like try-on sessions, beauty videos and workouts we like being hands free.” It’s also helpful to add a voiceover to help explain to viewers what’s happening, especially when the video isn’t long enough to give visuals for everything. Sasha Exeter also suggests the rule of thirds, which makes framing a shot easier, and more aesthetically pleasing. “By applying the simple principles, I benefit by getting the correct vertical and horizontal balance in my shot.”
How to: Open iPhone settings, choose “camera” slide the grid setting to “on.”
View this post on Instagram
Trainer @jodifarber1 💞#beckermanfitness #beckermanvideo #beckermantv
A post shared by Cailli Beckerman Sam Beckerman (@beckermanblog) on Jul 8, 2019 at 10:38am PDT
(4) Get Creative
Try out different camera features and angles to make your videos more creative. The iPhone XS and iPhone XR are able to create professional-level videos, so don’t be afraid to take risks. With the iPhone at your disposal, you can shoot in a number of unexpected settings, like slo-mo or time-lapse.
How to: Open “camera,” choose “slo-mo,” or Time-Lapse.
The post Looking to Up Your Insta Game? Here’s How to Nail an Instagram Video appeared first on FASHION Magazine.
Looking to Up Your Insta Game? Here’s How to Nail an Instagram Video published first on https://borboletabags.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
$200 vs $4,000 Camera: Is Your Phone Good Enough for Travel Photography?
Sensor image quality has advanced so much over the last few years that phone manufacturers are boasting photographs that rival those from larger mirrorless and DSLR cameras. Some, like the Xiaomi Mi CC9 at 108 megapixels, quadruple the resolution of my best camera.
The iPhone 11 Pro and Google Pixel 4 have incredible night mode capabilities using imaging algorithm and stabilization that’s comparable to the high ISO capabilities of my Sony Alpha. Most of them shoot 4K video at 60 FPS. Between using Filmic Pro for film and Snapseed for photos, I have more options than ever with what tools I choose to shoot with.
And that’s just it. Options.
As a photographer and filmmaker, I don’t feel anxious that phones are allowing more people to produce footage that is comparable to my bigger and more expensive set-ups. In fact, I feel better knowing that on days in which I don’t feel like lugging my gear around or even taking my camera out to capture some food photography, I have the option of producing something that is high quality and sometimes indistinguishable from the images coming out of my Sony a7 III.
Comparing iPhone 7 Vs Sony a7S II Images
And I want to prove that using two photographs I took using my Sony a7S II and iPhone 7 (both are 12-megapixel cameras, both a few years old) a couple of years back in the Lofoten Islands of Norway. At the time, I didn’t plan on doing a comparison — I just happened to take the image first on my phone before pulling out my camera to get the shot with a slower exposure.
While resorting through my images recently, I came across the two images side by side when I did a batch edit and noticed that they came out differently (JPEGs don’t respond to the same changes as RAW files). Out of curiosity, I spent about 5 minutes to see if I could make the images similar.
The results were interesting. In fact, they were getting so close than I spent another 5 minutes to spot edit a few things to see if I can make them indistinguishable.
Here are the two photos:
How long did it take you to figure out which was shot on the iPhone 7 and which was shot on the Sony a7S II? How did you figure it out and are you correct? I’ll reveal the answer a few paragraphs down.
Did I Edit The Images?
Quite a bit. The process of creating a photograph is different for everyone and has only ever been limited by the tools that we have access to, whether be it in a physical darkroom or today in Adobe’s Lightroom (and Photoshop). Personally, I do most of my image editing in Lightroom. It’s fast, allows me to do most of the manipulation I want, and I can batch edit a bunch of similar images.
For these two images, I played around quite a bit with the white balance temperature, colors, exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, curves, clarity, texture, and dehaze. The Sony a7S II image was slightly wider at 24mm on a full-frame sensor, so I cropped it some to match the iPhone’s field of view and I cropped the iPhone into a 2×3 aspect ratio to match with the Sony image.
Below are the edited images next to their originals.
Comparison With The Original Images
In the Sony a7S II original, you can more details in the cloud and the overall colors, tone, and contrast of the image are different from the edited version. I shot this with the Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM lens at .8 sec shutter speed, f/22, and ISO 100. The slightly slower shutter speed allows me to blur the movements of water just a bit. I was kicking myself for not bringing any graduated or ND filters to allow me to shoot even slower than this and to retain the details in the cloud.
In the iPhone 7 version, the first noticeable difference was the completely blown highlights in the cloud. The phone camera also exposed it a bit darker and warmer than a7S II. Other than that, the details are very similar and, in fact, the overall image is sharper than the Sony a7S II because there was some accidental motion micro-shake with the a7S II. The iPhone image was taken at 1/120 sec, f/1.8, and ISO 20.
For both, I added a gradient filter from the top down over the mountains to blow out all the clouds completely and went negative on the dehaze and clarity to add a soft glow to the top of the mountains. This effect ultimately hid the shortcomings of the iPhone sensor with not being able to capture the same dynamic range that a Sony RAW file can.
Below are two cropped views to give you a sense of detail.
iPhone 7 Sony a7S II
Like I mentioned earlier, shooting at .8 sec on a travel tripod standing on a windy bridge created some unwanted shake in the a7S II image. On the iPhone image, the detail is pretty sharp, and sometimes almost too sharp for me. To compensate for that, I dialed down the texture a bit to de-sharpen the image.
You can click here for the iPhone and here for the Sony to download higher resolution versions of the two images for pixel peeping if that’s your thing.
So did you guess correctly above? The a7S II was the first (top) one. Congratulations if you guessed it right. For me, it’s still hard when I look at them side by side, but the giveaway would have been the blurred movement in the water from the slower exposure.
Is Your Phone Good Enough For Travel Photography?
The short answer is yes. With careful composition and exposure, you can take spectacular photographs with your phone. With all the new phones sporting multiple cameras and crazy imaging algorithms to produce some high-quality images, you have a lot more features at your disposal with the device that you’ll always have on you.
With the iPhone 11 Pro, you can even get some beautiful portraits with some nice optically-produced bokeh at a tighter focal length. For landscapes, you can throw on a wide adapter and match the super-wide field of view of my widest camera lens. Even without it, you’re getting a pretty wide image.
With the Snapseed and Lightroom app on your mobile OS, you can edit images even quicker than on your laptop/desktop software. It’s crazy how fast I can create an image out of Snapseed and send/share it right away. I’m finding myself content with shooting on my iPhone a lot more than I was in the past. Even when I’m not, sometimes I’ll send the images from my camera to my phone and do an edit there for social media instead of waiting to load it onto my computer.
Ultimately, as far as photographs go, I believe the content of a good, compelling image will outweigh its technical specs, always. As a photographer and archivist, I want to have the best quality that I can get. When it comes to sharing, most content is consumed on mobile devices where you can hardly appreciate the qualities of a 50-megapixel camera. You probably can’t tell the difference between a 24- and 12-megapixel camera because of the relatively low image sizes that are uploaded and further compressed before viewing.
In other words, as long as an image looks good, most people won’t care about the megapixel count or even what camera it was taken with.
As far as video, which I will go into detail in a separate post, most cameras now shoot 4K 60 FPS, which will allow you to create some beautiful slow-motion footage. Using the Filmic Pro app, I have more control over my settings and have used footage shot from my phone mixed in with my a7S II footage.
The answer is basically yes, you can use your phone for travel photography.
Is The End Near For Professional Cameras?
Absolutely not. While I used this example to illustrate what you can do with a camera phone image (and not even the latest iPhone which is far better than the iPhone 7 camera), a lot of post-processing and artistic intent went into the final image. With the a7S II, I was able to shoot at a wider angle that I preferred (and even wider if I put on my 16-35mm lens). The built-in cameras are still limited in what focal lengths you can shoot with (although with all the triple and quad camera systems, that might change soon).
Mirrorless and DSLR cameras will, for the most part, still produce better images out of the camera than your phone, and allow you more flexibility with interchangeable lenses. For images with more shallow depth of field, the bokeh created digitally is currently not as good as the optical bokeh you get from different lenses. I will almost always shoot with my camera if I want to shoot portraits.
I also prefer the RAW images that come out of my cameras, which gives me more latitude to make fine adjustments. I’ve seen some amazing edits and composites from artists using JPEG images, so I’m not saying it’s not possible, but it’s just a little easier for me to have more data and detail to work with in my edit.
Ultimately, both my Sony (currently a7 III) camera and iPhone (currently XR) are tools, and I always process the images to create a final image that I envision and want to share. Learning your tools is the best way to get the most of your images and constantly relearning is the only way I’ve found to get better and not get stale.
These are all personal preferences, so how you look at it might be different, but it’s certainly interesting for me to see how far camera phone images have come since I first took a photo with my Sony Clie UX-50 PDA.
About the author: Kien Lam is an international photographer and filmmaker based in San Francisco. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. He runs whereandwander.com and believes in living for those moments that make the best stories, told or untold. He is working through his bucket list and wants to help others do the same. You can find more of his photos on Instagram. This article was also published here.
Read more about this at petapixel.com
https://bestcamaccessories.com/200-vs-4000-camera-is-your-phone-good-enough-for-travel-photography/
0 notes