Tumgik
#but I have a bill due that's also coincidentally $40
plushie-lovey · 1 year
Text
Crying so hard I want the pumpkin kitty from BAB but I'm too chicken to go into my local store to see if they have it (having to go thru the heart ceremony specifically is what's making me anxious cause I've never actually gone thru the whole BAB experience before. And I don't wanna have to do goofy things in public by myself). I'm also struggling to justify spending $40 on a plushie this week
5 notes · View notes
papermoonloveslucy · 3 years
Text
‘MY GOOD WIFE’ v ‘MY FAVORITE HUSBAND’
June 23, 1949
Tumblr media
"My Good Wife," an added starter on KNBC, 6:30 p.m. PST Fridays, is another comedy about a young married couple, as if we needed another one. I must admit this one is a little different. This married couple, Steve and Kay Emerson, are not nearly so fast with a wisecrack as, say, Lucille Ball and her husband on "My Favorite Husband," 9:00 p.m. PST the same night on KCBS. Great night for matrimony, Fridays, and if those two programs don't provide enough for you, tune in Dorothy Dix at 1:45 pm. (not broadcast in west). She'll tell you how to win back an erring husband. 
I haven't yet made up my mind whether the Emerson's ineptness at repartee is deliberate - after all, not every young wife talks like Groucho Marx - or whether the script writer isn't very good at it either. Anyhow, whether by accident or design, the Emersons are a very restful young couple, possibly a little too restful to get anywhere in the entertainment world. In radio, they're a real novelty. 
As a wife Arlene Francis who plays Kay Emerson, wins out on points over Lucille Ball In other regards - talent and looks, for example - Miss Ball is way out front. But how long could you live with a girl who says: "Oh, we don't miss television. I climb in the Bendix and sing and George looks at me through the little window." Imagine having a girl around the house who said things like that before breakfast. It'd curdle the milk. 
STARTS OFF FAST 
“My Good Wife" started out at a gallop two weeks ago, NBC deciding to set the stage and get everything out of the way all at once. The first program resembled one at those synopses of previous in installments in the popular magazines. Steve met Kay, quarreled with her, married her, taught her how to drive, learned he was about to become a father, and became one - all in 15 minutes. One minute later, the dialogue went like this: 
"It doesn't seem like we've been married 12 years." 
"We've been married 10 years." 
"Well, that's why it doesn't seem like 12." 
That, incidentally, Is a little brighter than the conversation around the Emerson household generally gets. 
On the second show of the series, the pace settled down to a walk. During the first few minutes the Emersons and their neighbors lay lazily on the grass, not  even talking very much. This may be taking realism too far. I mean there ought to be some crickets chirping or something. Things quickened a bit later when Mrs. Emerson decided she was going to help her husband out with his law practice and, of course, messed things up. 
YALE, NO LESS 
The Emersons are quite upper middlebrow as radio's young married folk go. He went to Yale, for heaven's sake, and she not only went to Vassar but led the daisy chain or whatever they do with that daisy chain. What is this - counter revolution? Oh, yes, they live in Larchmont up to their ears in other upper middlebrows. I don't know what else to tell you about the Emersons except they sound like a nice young couple to have over for a drink some time but conceivably a little mild to entertain you much on the air. 
My favorite young married couple is still Ozzie and Harriet Nelson - I put Goodman and Jane Ace off in another category entirely - and while we're chatting about this sort of thing, I ought to point out Ricky and David Nelson, Ozzie and Harriet's children, are now playing themselves on that program which solves a lot of problems. I have a spy in the Nelson household, named - in case any congressional ears are pricking - Harriet Nelson, nee Harriet Hilliard, and she is not now and has never been a Communist nor worked on the atom bomb nor designed the B-36. 
Anyhow, my spy informed the Nelsons had a little trouble with the kids. The real Ricky and David I listened to the radio Ricky and David and discovered them doing things they weren't allowed to do or wouldn't do voluntarily if they were allowed. Being children, they got confused over their own identities. Well now the real Ricky and David are the radio Ricky and David and the split personalities in the kids has been averted. You run into a lot of funny problems in radio.
#  #  #  
FOOTNOTES FROM THE FUTURE
Tumblr media
It seems pretty clear that NBC was counter-programming CBS’s “My Favorite Husband”.  Not only are the names very similar, they were scheduled on the same night, as critic Crosby points out.  
Tumblr media
The episode of “My Favorite Husband” described above might apply to any domestic sitcom, but was actually titled “Budget - Mr. Atterbury” broadcast June 3, 1949.  However, this newspaper is still calling Lucille Ball’s character Liz Cugat, when her name had changed to Liz Cooper in January 1949, to avoid comparison with the well-known bandleader (no, not Desi Arnaz).  
Tumblr media
Counter-programming by NBC would not stop on radio.  When “I Love Lucy” was a juggernaut hit for CBS TV, NBC created a similar show titled “I Married Joan” for star Joan Davis.  It was billed as “The adventures of the scatterbrained wife of a respected city judge.”  Substitute “bandleader” for “Judge” (played by Jim Backus) - and you’ve got “I Love Lucy.”  Like Ball, Davis was a film star of the ‘30s and ‘40s getting aboard the TV bandwagon.  Like Lucy, Joan wanted to be in showbusiness. Many of the same situations that Lucy got into, Joan did too. The series even featured a few “I Love Lucy” refugees:  Jerry Hausner, Elvia Allman, Bob Jellison, Margie Liszt, Shirley Mitchell, Ross Elliott, and many others. "Lucy” and “Joan” even employed the same director in each show's first season, Marc Daniels. "Joan” lasted three seasons, from 1952 to 1955 and is all but forgotten today. 
Tumblr media
Kay Emerson was not the first domestic radio role for Arlene Francis. In 1940, she took over the role of Betty on “Betty and Bob”, which had been the first successful soap opera. She was one of the hosts of the quiz show “What’s My Name?” beginning in 1938. The show was seen as a model for TV’s “What’s My Line?” which premiered in 1950. Francis would stay with the show for its entire run, including six mystery guest appearances by Lucille Ball.  
Tumblr media
The husband to “My Good Wife” was played by John Conte.  From 1944 to 1946 he was married to Marilyn Maxwell (1944-46) who would later appear with Lucille Ball in the 1963 film Critic’s Choice.  He had also been seen with Ball (and Maxwell) in As Thousands Cheer (1943). In 1960 he would work for Desilu in an episode of “The Untouchables” (1960).
Tumblr media
Unlike “My Favorite Husband’s” mythical mid-Western Sheridan Falls, the Emerson’s livid in the real New York suburb of Larchmont, an affluent village located within the Town of Mamaroneck in Westchester County, New York, approximately 18 miles northeast of Midtown Manhattan.  Nearby was the town of New Rochelle, whose most famous fictional resident was Rob Petrie on “The Dick Van Dyke Show” (filmed at Desilu Studios).  Danfield, New York, another fictional town in the area, was the residence of Lucy Carmichael and Vivian Bagley for the first three seasons of “The Lucy Show.” 
Tumblr media
“My Good Wife” began airing in June 1949, and by April 1950 was nowhere to be found. In October 1949, Billboard reported on a new NBC Gallup Poll that placed the show dead last - with 32 stations voting it poor and only 8 saying it was excellent.  The future of “Wife” was bleak. The sitcom was cancelled after 18 weeks to make room for the new Jimmy Durante show. Meanwhile, Ball’s “Husband” (on CBS), thrived.  Coincidentally, the show was initially a replacement for Red Skelton’s show. Skelton and Durante had both worked with Ball on films.  
Tumblr media
Crosby’s quote from “My Favorite Husband”  
"Oh, we don't miss television. I climb in the Bendix and sing and George looks at me through the little window."
was spoken by Lucille Ball in the episode titled “Television” on June 17, 1949.  A Bendix is a brand of front-loading washing machine. The porthole-like window was similar to the size screen of early television sets.  
Tumblr media
Crosby’s observation that Liz talks like Groucho Marx is attributable to the show’s writers Bob Carroll, Jr., Madelyn Pugh, and Jess Oppenheimer.  And let’s not forget that Lucille Ball acted opposite Groucho Marx in Room Service (1938)!      
Tumblr media
After making the obvious comparison to “My Favorite Husband,” Crosby lets readers know that neither “Husband” nor “Wife” will ever displace “The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriett” in his domestic dome. The show launched October 8, 1944 and a total 402 radio episodes were produced. When it was optioned for television, it was upstart network ABC that made the sweetest deal to the Nelsons. 
Tumblr media
As Crosby alludes to, their real-life sons, David and Ricky, did not join the cast until the radio show's fifth year. The two boys were played by professional actors prior to their joining because both were too young to perform. Crosby’s allegations of possible identity crisis due to watching their parents with other sons on television, might easily apply to “I Love Lucy”, where the real-life Desi Arnaz often lived in the shadow of the young actors playing Little Ricky on television. Mrs. Ricardo and Mrs. Arnaz giving birth to both boys on the same day only added to the confusion - one that still lingers today. 
Tumblr media
Crosby declines to compare the aforementioned shows with the popular Goodman and Jane Ace. The real-life marrieds had a show titled “Easy Aces”  Goodman Ace cast himself as a harried real estate salesman and the exasperated but loving husband of the scatterbrained, malaprop-prone Jane ("Time wounds all heels"). “Easy Aces” became a long-running serial comedy (1930–1945) but did not make a graceful transition to television, lasting only a few months on the ill-fated DuMont Network. Coincidentally, Martin Gabel, who married Arlene Francis in 1946, had a recurring role on “Easy Aces” during the 1930s. 
Tumblr media
In a more sarcastic shout-out, Crosby mentions capping off this slew of domestic dithering by listening to Dorothy Dix.  Author Elizabeth Meriwether Gilmer (1861-1951) was widely known by the pen name Dorothy Dix. As the forerunner of today’s popular advice columnists, Dix was America’s highest paid and most widely read female journalist at the time of her death. Her advice on marriage was syndicated in newspapers around the world with an estimated audience of 60 million readers.  Naturally, radio was not neglected, getting their Dix fix when her column took to the airwaves.  Due to Lucy’s insistence on interfering in the Mertz’s personal affairs, Ricky compares Lucy to Dorothy Dix in “Fred and Ethel Fight” (ILL S1;E22) on March 10, 1952. 
Tumblr media
We haven’t yet mentioned this 1940 gem, but we’ll save that for another time!  
2 notes · View notes
charlessizemore · 7 years
Text
Here’s to Last-Minute Tax Moves
Tumblr media
It’s almost tax filing deadline day. Pop the balloons and streamers, right?
But, really, it’s almost here.
The federal income tax filing deadline this year is less than two weeks away, on Tuesday, April 18.
Why am I bringing this up? One, a reminder can’t hurt; but two, as editor of Dent Research’s 401k Advisor, in addition to my duties as portfolio manager of Boom & Bust and editor of Peak Income, I’ve got last-minute 401(k) tax breaks on my mind.
If you’ve read some of my work before, you know I’m all about tax breaks. I don’t believe in giving the government a single red cent if I can legally avoid it. And there’s no better place to create some advantages for yourself than with your 401(k).
I recommend you max out your 401(k) by contributing the full $18,000 (or $24,000 if you’re 50 or older). But contributing anything to a 401(k) is a good start.
Even more so if your employer matches any contributions. Not all offer that benefit, but if they’re kind and able enough, that’s free money on the table.
I’ve said it before, but this is so important: Since every dollar you divert to your 401(k) avoids taxation, the “returns” you get from playing keep away from Uncle Sam, and employer matching, crush the returns you’re likely to earn from the investments themselves.
We’re talking bigger than 40% “returns” for those in the highest tax brackets. Think about that, and then think about the fact that, as Rodney wrote earlier this week, 40% of Americans over 62 have less than $25,000 in financial assets.
At this point, you can’t contribute any additional 2016 funds into your employer’s 401(k) plan. Those contributions had to be taken from your paycheck by December 31.
But you might have some other options at your disposal to lower your tax bill and pad your retirement nest egg.
If you or your spouse have access to a 401(k) at work, you might also be able to make a deductible contribution to a Traditional IRA, if your income falls below a certain limit.
But even if you earn too much to make a deductible contribution, you can make a non-deductible contribution that would still benefit from tax-free dividend, interest, and capital gains compounding.
A Roth IRA is also a great long-term savings vehicle. You get no immediate tax break, but your earnings would grow tax-free over time and, unlike with the Traditional IRA, there are no required minimum distributions once you turn 70½.
For another last-minute tax fix, consider a Health Savings Account (HSA). Due to the massive inflation in healthcare costs over the past decade, more Americans than ever have been corralled into high-deductible health insurance plans, many of which come with access to an HSA.
I personally pay cash for my medical expenses and use my HSA as a “spillover” IRA, though I should be very clear that IRAs and HSAs are very different vehicles when it comes to withdrawal fees and investment options. Though they do have the same contribution cut off: the April 18 tax filing deadline.
I write in more detail about these type of tax-break options, how to approach the Trump Rally with your retirement accounts, and update our first-quarter performance in the latest edition of Dent 401k Advisor, which subscribers received this week.
Coincidentally, we’ve just re-opened access to one of Dent Research’s most elite level memberships. Among many other benefits, you get lifetime access to 401k Advisor. That’s a good thing, if we do say so ourselves.
But there’s limited time and room to sign up. We only have space for 150 new subscribers, and spots are going fast. Get yours now.
Until next time,
Charles Sizemore Boom & Bust Portfolio Manager
Read more at Economy & Markets Daily!
2 notes · View notes
placetobenation · 5 years
Link
Melody Time
Release Date: May 27th, 1948
Inspiration: N/A
Budget: $1.5 million
Domestic Gross: $1.81 million
Worldwide Gross: $2.56 million
Rotten Tomatoes Score: 80%
IMDB Score: 6.4/10
Storyline (per IMDB): Segments: “Once Upon a Wintertime,” two lovers rescued from an icy river by friendly animals; “Bumble Boogie,” bee beset by musical instruments and symbols come to life; “Johnny Appleseed,” story of the legendary pioneer tree-planter; “Trees,” mood piece set to musical treatment of Joyce Kilmer’s poem; “Little Toot,” story of a heroic little tugboat who saves an ocean liner; “Blame it on the Samba,” Donald Duck and Jose Carioca have the blues blown away at a Latin cafe; “Pecos Bill,” story of the legendary cowpoke, his trusty mount Widowmaker and his sweetheart Slue Foot Sue.
Pre-Watching Thoughts: We continue to trek our way towards the end of the 1940s with the fifth straight package film released during this time. It’s been no secret in doing these reviews that the package films have not held up that well which isn’t to say they’ve been bad which they aren’t, but compared to what I have watched prior to them I have seen a downturn in quality. Fortunately, we only have two more to go and hopefully this film ends up slightly better than what Make Mine Music was, but I’m not holding my breath on that one.
Voice Cast: Much like Make Mine Music, we have some big names for the time brought in to serve as either the narrators or singers for the segments though some of them also provide voices for the characters in a few of the segments. We first have Buddy Clark who sings the title song and provides the buffers between segments which he does a fine job at, and then for the Winter Wonderland segment we have Francis Langford performing in what would be one of her final performances on the big screen. Next we have composer and musician Freddy Martin who leads the orchestra in playing “Flight of the Bumblebee” and then for the story of Johnny Appleseed, we have radio personality Dennis Day who narrates while also voicing Johnny and his guardian angel. We then have a returning group as the Andrews Sisters tell the story of Little Toot and following that, we have bandleader Fred Waring along with his group the Pennsylvanians as they perform the music for the poem about trees. For “Blame it on the Samba”, the Dinning Sisters perform the song while organist Ethel Smith performs the organ and makes a live action cameo playing the organ while Donald and Jose dance for her. Finally for the segment on Pecos Bill, we have a few more live action cameos as legendary actor Roy Rogers narrates the story of child actors Luana Patten and Bobby Driscoll while Bob Nolan and the Sons of the Pioneers sing the story of Pecos Bill. Those involved did well in their jobs and they were pretty big names for the time, and for some of them this would be the peak of their careers while for others it was just another step in their careers.
Hero/Prince: N/A
Princess: N/A
Villain: N/A
Other Characters: So again much like Fantasia and Make Mine Music, we don’t have any main characters as we just have characters that are specific to their own segments and we don’t see them intertwine. For the first segment, we have the couple that is known as Joe and Jenny though they do not speak at all, and we also have the animals that accompany them as well as help Joe save Jenny in the end. We then have the bumblebee who goes through a wild ride in “Bumble Boogie”, and then in our first major segment we have Johnny Appleseed and his guardian angel along with the pioneers and animals featured as well. Next we have Little Toot along with the other tugboats who shun him when he causes chaos before accepting him when he saves a ship during a storm, and then we have the return of Donald Duck, Jose Carioca, and the Aracuan bird who join Ethel Smith in dancing the samba. Finally, we have Roy Rogers, Luana Patten, Bobby Driscoll, and the cowboys who sing the story of Pecos Bill, and in the actual segment we have Pecos Bill, his love Slue Foot Sue, and the cowboys of the town they live in. This was fine as again these characters worked well for the segments that they were featured in and really besides Donald and Jose, they wouldn’t work well within the other segments especially since nothing connects them together.
Songs: Once again much like Fantasia and Make Mine Music, we have a film where each segment is basically either a song animated or a segment that is mainly sung by someone so those will not be included here even though they were considered. However, we do have one song that is included in here and that is the title track for the film entitled “Melody Time”, and it is pretty similar to Make Mine Music in that it was written so that the film could have a title track. It was a fine song to start things off for the film and works well for the film, but much like the other title tracks of the package films it doesn’t stand up to the other major Disney songs.
Plot: Not to sound like a broken record, but we once again have a film that is pretty much in the same vein as Fantasia and Make Mine Music in that there is no overarching story in the film, instead it is a series of segments set to music that may feature some dialogue or narration. Each segment was completely different from the other ones so there was no real flow between segments, and the only buffer to each segment was a magic paintbrush that would showcase who was up next while we heard the narrator hype the segment. It was fine for what it was since it was pretty much just a bunch of animations around the music aside from telling the stories of Johnny Appleseed and Pecos Bill, and it worked well for a film like this as again it was the same style of Fantasia and Make Mine Music.
Random Watching Thoughts: I didn’t think Radio RKO Pictures was still around even at this point; Trigger: The Smartest Horse in the Movies; Once again, we have a title song made specifically to intro the film of the same name; It is kind of interesting how they make it seem like you are watching a variety show given how many segments there are; Kind of funny that we have a segment about a winter wonderland given that the film was released in May; I don’t know why, but this animation just feels very un-Disney like; They had to find numerous ways to make a variety of hearts to put over the romance in this segment; How did they go from being on a pond to being in a river so quickly, and where did that waterfall come from?; It is interesting knowing that since this was before TV, their guest stars were mostly stars on the radio; Fun fact: the segment about the flight of the bumblebee was originally considered for Fantasia; That poor bee went through so much with the instruments blowing him around and stalking him; I feel like Johnny Appleseed is not talked about much in the modern day for how legendary a pioneer he was; I wonder if Johnny ever at any point in his life grew tired of apples and wanted to grow something else; It’s always funny that the pioneers were so excited to travel out west completely unaware of the dangers they were going to face; They really made apples seem like nature’s greatest gift; You have to be so dedicated to your craft if you pay no heed to any animals that are ready to attack you; When has a skunk ever been referred to as a black and white cat?; You want to know how to tame animals when they are prepared to attack them, just pet them softly and they will fall in love with you. Typical Disney logic; There is no jubilee quite like an apple jubilee; That chipmunk on Johnny’s shoulder again looks suspiciously like Dale, but where’s Chip?; You must be very happy with your life if you spend 40 years just planting apple seeds before falling asleep under a tree and dying peacefully; Even in death, Johnny feels like he can continue planting the frontier until the angel tells him he can plant in heaven; Little Toot was basically acting like a disobedient toddler even though he wanted to be a help; How strong was Little Toot that he could push that big ship around with such ease to cause it to crash into the city?; I get that Little Toot had to be punished for what he did, but forcing him out into the ocean by himself seems a bit harsh; Even the buoys and lighthouse had no sympathy for Little Toot; Is it a coincidence that there just happened to be a ship in need of help so that Little Toot could redeem himself?; I feel like by this point they were scraping the bottom of the barrel by doing an animated segment about a poem to a tree; This “Trees” segment seems like it could’ve fit better in Bambi; Good to see Donald, Jose Carioca, and the Aracuan bird one more time, almost like they were the poster children for these package films since they have been in a bunch of them; I like how Donald and Jose were figuratively and literally blue until the samba brought the color back to them; Also, is it coincidental that there is always a live action female whenever Donald and Jose are around?; I wonder if you ask someone what they know about Roy Rogers, they might mention the chain of fast food restaurants that are named for him; I know Texas is the biggest state in the continental US, but talk about your exaggerations when they showed the size of Texas compared to the other states, plus we apparently have the Gulf of Texas which replaced the Gulf of Mexico; So Pecos Bill was raised by coyotes similar to how Mowgli was raised by wolves in “The Jungle Book”; Fitting that the welcoming committee for the desert is a flock of vultures; Fun fact: the scene with the tornado was edited out of the video release originally due to Bill smoking a cigarette yet somehow the scene with Bill chasing the Native Americans was kept in; Nothing comes between a cowboy and his horse expect for a beautiful woman; Western weddings were very complex, especially back in the old days; That bustle must be strong as hell to keep Sue bouncing repeatedly until she was able to bounce to the moon, and how did she survive in space?
Overall Thoughts: Overall, this film was just slightly better than Make Mine Music but it is still not that great of a film which is unfortunate. Again, I want to make it clear that these films are not bad per se and they are fine for what they were, but when you are comparing them to the other films in the Disney canon they do not hold up that well. These package films were already kind of maligned to begin with and I was hoping that perhaps they were more underrated and underappreciated, but sadly that has not been the case. We only have one more film left in the package era before we begin the new decade and jump right back into the major films, and hopefully the last package film can end this era on a good note. As for Melody Time, it is a perfectly acceptable film for what it was though it definitely ranks near the bottom of the ranks of the Disney film canon.
Final Grade: 3.5/10
0 notes
paullassiterca · 6 years
Text
Top Tips to Avoid Pharmaceutical Injury
30 Tips in 30 Days Designed to Help You Take Control of Your Health
This article is included in Dr. Mercola’s All-Time Top 30 Health Tips series. Every day during the month of January, a new tip will be added that will help you take control of your health. Want to see the full list? Click here.
Vaccines have quickly become Big Pharma’s most lucrative profit center. Currently valued at more than $34 billion a year, the vaccine industry is projected to exceed $49 billion by 2022.1 There are several reasons for this rapid growth. Not only are vaccines priced much higher than pills, but governments and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are also engaged in the marketing of vaccines.
These unethical partnerships, which use both taxpayer and NGO money, advance misleading research intended to frighten the public. Worse, they discredit vaccine critics who raise legitimate safety and efficacy questions and even discredit the families and victims of vaccine injuries themselves.
To cash in on vaccine profits, Big Pharma, governments and NGOs have cast all vaccines as “life-saving.” One of the clearest examples is the attempt to present the HPV vaccine as an “anticancer” vaccine, even though there’s not a single shred of evidence that it actually has an impact on cervical cancer rates. Meanwhile, mounting evidence of serious harm and death caused by the HPV vaccine is being ignored or cast aside as “coincidental.”
To Avoid Vaccine Injury, Educate Yourself About the Risks
The official stance repeated by most mainstream media is that vaccines have been thoroughly researched, that “hundreds” of studies have proven their safety, and that no link between vaccines and health problems, such as autism, have ever been found.
It sounds definitive enough, and is often repeated as established fact. Yet it’s far from the whole truth. Importantly, the vaccine industry has long shied away from evaluating vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations to determine potential differences in general health outcomes.
The few independent scientists who have attempted such an investigation have little comfort to give to those who believe vaccines are essential for health, and mandatory use of vaccines by all children is the only way to protect society from disease.
Vaccine May Actually Be Doing More Harm Than Good
One such study,2 published in 2017, examined health outcomes among infants 3 to 5 months old following the introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccine in Guinea-Bissau, which took place in the early 1980s. This population offered the rare opportunity to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children due to the way the vaccines were rolled out in the West African country.
Shockingly, researchers discovered “DTP was associated with fivefold higher mortality than being unvaccinated.” According to the authors, “All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.”
In short, the researchers concluded that DTP vaccine weakened the children’s immune systems, rendering them vulnerable to a whole host of other often deadly diseases and serious health problems.
In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommends that children receive 69 doses of 16 vaccines by the time they’re 18 years old, with 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before the age of 6.3
This, despite the fact that no thorough investigation has ever been conducted to determine how all of these vaccines actually affect a child’s health. What’s worse, no one is tracking the health outcomes of children who adhere to the federally recommended childhood vaccine schedule and state mandatory vaccination programs.
Lawyers with the U.S. Justice Department also defend vaccines in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP), commonly referred to as “vaccine court,” which means the U.S. government has a stake in maintaining the illusion that vaccines are a necessary lifesaving measure that causes minimal harm.
High Vaccination Rate Does Not Translate Into Better Infant Health
What we do know is that:
• The U.S. has the highest vaccination rate in the world, with 94 to 96 percent of children entering kindergarten having received multiple doses of vaccines4
• The U.S. also has one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates of any developed nation5,6
• 1 in 6 American children has a developmental disability, which includes ADD, ADHD, autism, hearing loss, learning disabilities, mental disabilities, seizures and stammering — many of which are also listed or known side effects of vaccines
• 54 percent of children have a diagnosed chronic illness, including anxiety, asthma, behavioral problems, bone and muscle disorders, chronic ear infections, depression, diabetes, food and/or environmental allergies and epilepsy.
This list again mirrors many of the acknowledged side effects of vaccines, and the rise in prevalence of these diseases parallel the rise in required vaccines, yet vaccine promoters insist that these illnesses are in no way associated with vaccinations
Common Vaccine Side Effects
Both the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court have also admitted that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe,”7 and possible side effects that are actually listed on vaccine inserts include:
Autoimmune diseases
Food allergies
Asthma
Eczema
Type 1 diabetes
Rheumatoid arthritis
Tics
Tourette syndrome
ADD/ADHD
Autism
Speech delay
Neurodevelopment disorders
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
Seizure disorder
Narcolepsy
Vaccines also have the highest number of recalls of any drug, which speaks to their “unavoidably unsafe” nature. Victims have also received compensation from the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) for the following (and other) injuries:
Guillain-Barre syndrome
Transverse myelitis
Encephalopathy
Seizure disorder hypoxic seizure
Death
Brachial neuritis
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
Premature ovarian failure
Bell’s palsy
Type 1 diabetes
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
Rheumatic arthritis
Multiple sclerosis
Fibromyalgia
Anaphylaxis
Ocular myasthenia gravis
Infantile spasms
The Vaccines-Autism Link Revived
youtube
According to the latest survey,8,9 1 in 40 American children between the ages of 3 and 17 is now on the autism spectrum. This shocking update was published in the journal Pediatrics in December 2018. In 2014, the rate was 1 in 59; in 2010, it was 1 in 68; in 2000, it was 1 in 150.10 To say we’re looking at exponential growth would be an understatement. But do vaccines have anything to do with this trend?
According to a Full Measure report11 by award-winning investigative reporter and former CBS correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a pediatric neurologist, was the pro-vaccine expert witness the government used to debunk and turn down autism claims in vaccine court.
“Zimmerman was the government’s top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn’t cause autism. The debate was declared over,” Attkisson reports. “But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information.
He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children. That turnabout from the government’s own chief medical expert stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate. If the public were to find out …
And he has come forward and explained how he told the United States government vaccines can cause autism in a certain subset of children and [the] United States government, the Department of Justice [DOJ], suppressed his true opinions.”
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman of The World Mercury Project, was the one who convinced Zimmerman to speak out about the cover-up. In a sworn affidavit, dated September 7, 2018, Zimmerman states that, in 2007, he told DOJ lawyers he had “discovered exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.”
“I explained that in a subset of children … vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation … did cause regressive [brain disease] with features of autism spectrum disorder,” Zimmerman writes.
A week after this 2007 meeting, the DOJ fired him, saying his services would no longer be needed. According to Zimmerman, the DOJ then went on to misrepresent his opinion in future cases, making no mention of the exceptions he’d informed them of. Kennedy has now filed a fraud complaint with the DOJ Inspector General.
William Thompson, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the CDC’s National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, has also confessed to covering up links found between vaccines and autism, in this case the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
According to Thompson, this scientific fraud was committed for the express purpose of covering up potential safety problems so the agency would be able to maintain that the MMR vaccine had been proven safe to give to all children. By eliminating the incriminating data, the link vanished, and this research has been cited as proof ever since that vaccines don’t cause autism.
Attkisson’s report also reveals how Congressmen who wanted to investigate the autism-vaccine link were bullied, harassed and threatened. Dan Burton (R-IN), Dr. Dave Weldon (R-FL) and Bill Posey (R-FL) are among 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who told Attkisson they were warned to drop the vaccine safety issue by PhRMA lobbyists.
Vaccines Can Have Serious Consequences for Adults Too
While children are more susceptible to vaccine damage than adults, grownups can and have been seriously injured and killed by routine vaccinations as well. It’s important to realize that no vaccine is 100 percent safe for everyone. As reported by CNN, an oncologist with London’s Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust recently died following a routine yellow fever vaccination:12
“Martin Gore, 67, died Thursday morning after receiving the vaccine, which is recommended to travelers visiting sub-Saharan Africa, most of South America, and parts of Central American and the Caribbean …
Gore’s death casts light on the heightened risk associated with the yellow fever vaccine and the over-60 demographic. Typical side effects of the vaccine include headaches, muscle pain, mild fever and soreness at the injection site …
However, the vaccinations can, in rare circumstances, cause more severe side effects, including allergic reactions and problems affecting the brain or organs …
The WHO reported that all cases of viscerotropic disease — a rare but dangerous side effect of yellow fever vaccinations where an illness similar to wild-type yellow fever proliferates in multiple organs — have occurred in primary vaccines, starting two to five days after vaccination.”
Might Vaccine Reaction Rate Be as High as 1 in 10?
youtube
In the video above, Del Bigtree,13 an Emmy Award-winning producer of “The Doctors” talk show for six years, and one of the producers of the documentary, “Vaxxed,” discusses vaccine safety, or rather the lack thereof.
In it, he recounts how, in 2010, the CDC hired a company to automate the federal vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) in such a way that any potential vaccine reactions reported to doctors participating in the Harvard Pilgrim HMO would automatically be uploaded into the VAERS database.
Remarkably, preliminary data showed that out of 376,452 individuals given 45 different vaccines, 35,570 possible vaccine reactions were identified. This means nearly 1 in 10 people suffered a reaction after vaccination concerning enough to be reported, yet the official CDC mantra is that the risk for serious vaccine injury or death is 1 in 1 million.
Unfortunately, while the creation of VAERS in 1986 was an opportunity to get a firmer grasp of the number of potential vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths occurring after vaccinations given in the U.S., the CDC didn’t follow through, and the project fell by the wayside.
Medical Errors Are the Third Leading Cause of Death in the US
While I’ve focused a lot of attention on vaccines and the necessity for educating yourself about their risks in this article, vaccines are by far not the only hazard presented by the medical industry. In fact, medical errors in general are the third leading cause of death, killing an estimated 250,000 Americans each year,14,15 an increase of about 25,000 people annually from data published in 2000.16
Side effects from drugs, taken as prescribed, account for the vast majority of iatrogenic deaths, but unnecessary surgeries, medication errors in hospitals, hospital-acquired infections and other medical errors occurring in hospitals also claim their fair share of lives.
Research17 published in 2013 estimated that preventable hospital errors kill 210,000 Americans each year — a figure that comes very close to the latest statistics. However, when deaths related to diagnostic errors, errors of omission, and failure to follow guidelines were included, the number skyrocketed to 440,000 preventable hospital deaths each year.
10 Tips to Avoid Medical Harm
How can you avoid becoming one of these statistics? Aside from educating yourself on the risks and benefits of vaccines, here are several additional suggestions:
Ask your doctor whether a recommended test and/or treatment is really necessary, and do your own homework — According to a report by the Institute of Medicine, an estimated 30 percent of all medical procedures, tests and medications may be unnecessary,18 any one of which can put you at risk for a potentially serious or lethal side effect.
An investigation19 by the Mayo Clinic published in 2013 also revealed between 40 and 78 percent of the medical testing, treatments and procedures you receive are of no benefit to you — or are actually harmful — as determined by clinical studies. To learn which tests and interventions may do more harm than good, browse through the Choosing Wisely website.20
Avoid hospitals unless absolutely necessary — According to 2011 statistics, 1 in 25 patients in the U.S. end up contracting some form of infection while in the hospital,21 and 205 Americans die from hospital-acquired infections each and every day.22
Do your due diligence before undergoing endoscopy — If you’re having a colonoscopy or any other procedure using a flexible endoscope done, you can significantly reduce your risk of contracting an infection by asking the hospital or facility how the scope is cleaned, and which cleaning agent is used.
Some esophagoscopes and bronchoscopes have sterile sheaths with disposable air-water and biopsy channels, but many others do not, and must be cleaned between each use. If the hospital or clinic uses glutaraldehyde, or the brand name Cidex, cancel your appointment and go elsewhere.
About 80 percent of clinics use glutaraldehyde because it’s a less expensive alternative; however, it does not do a good job of sterilizing the equipment. If they use peracetic acid, your likelihood of contracting an infection from a previous patient is slim.
To learn more about this, see my interview with David Lewis, Ph.D., in “How Improper Sterilization of Endoscopes Could Put Your Health at Risk.”
Enlist a health care advocate — Once hospitalized, you’re at risk for medical errors, so one of the best safeguards is to have someone there have someone there with you. It’s important to have a personal advocate present to ask questions and take notes.
For every medication given in the hospital, ask questions such as: “What is this medication? What is it for? What’s the dose?” Most people, doctors and nurses included, are more apt to go through that extra step of due diligence to make sure they’re getting it right if they know they’ll be questioned about it.
To learn more, listen to my interview with Dr. Andrew Saul in “What Hospitals Won’t Tell You — Vital Strategies That Could Save Your Life,” or pick up a copy of his book, “Hospitals and Health: Your Orthomolecular Guide to a Shorter Hospital Stay.”
In it, he discusses the dangers of hospital stays, the type of patient that tends to get killed most frequently, and how you can protect your health and life in the event you have to be hospitalized. For example, reminding nurses and doctors to wash their hands and change gloves before touching you can go a long way toward avoiding contamination with potentially lethal microbes.
Do your own prep for surgery — If you or someone you know is scheduled for surgery, print out the WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual,23 which is part of the campaign “Safe Surgery Saves Lives.” The checklist can be downloaded free of charge here. Print it out and bring it with you, as this can help you protect yourself, your family member or friend from preventable errors in care.
Know the most effective protocol for sepsis — Sepsis is a progressive disease process initiated by an aggressive, dysfunctional immune response to an infection in the bloodstream, which is why it’s sometimes referred to as blood poisoning. Each year, an estimated 1 million Americans get sepsis24,25 and up to half of them die as a result.26,27,28
Symptoms of sepsis are often overlooked, even by health professionals, and without prompt treatment, the condition can be deadly.
Unfortunately, conventional treatments often fail, and most hospitals have yet to embrace the use of intravenous (IV) vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine,29 a treatment developed by Dr. Paul Marik, which has been shown to reduce sepsis mortality from 40 to a mere 8.5 percent.30,31 Common signs and symptoms of sepsis to watch out for include:32
A high fever
Inability to keep fluids down
Rapid heartbeat; rapid, shallow breathing and/or shortness of breath
Lethargy and/or confusion
Slurred speech, often resembling intoxication
Should a few or all of these be present, seek immediate medical attention to rule out sepsis. Also inform the medical staff that you suspect sepsis, as time is of the essence when it comes to treatment, and urge them to use Marik’s protocol (currently the standard of care for sepsis at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, where Marik works). You can learn more about this protocol by following the hyperlink provided above.
Optimize your vitamin D instead of getting the flu vaccine — Research33,34 shows vitamin D optimization is a more effective flu prevention strategy than flu vaccination, reducing respiratory infections such as influenza by 50 percent in those with vitamin D blood levels below 10 ng/mL. People with higher vitamin D levels at baseline may reduce their risk by about 10 percent, which the researchers stated was about equal to the effect of flu vaccines.
Aside from vitamin D, loading up on vitamins B1 and C may go a long way toward keeping you healthy through the flu season and beyond. Influenza has also been successfully treated with high-dose vitamin C.35 Taking zinc lozenges at the first sign of a cold or flu can also be helpful.
Avoid antibiotics — Drugs are vastly overprescribed and misused, and this is particularly true for antibiotics. Avoid using them unless absolutely necessary, and remember they don’t work for viral infections. Unnecessary use of antibiotics is one of the driving causes of antibiotic-resistant superbugs.
Turn a deaf ear to drug ads — While drug makers are required to inform consumers about potential side effects in their ads, they’ve perfected drug ad narration to make them less frightful.36
Avoid drugs, unless absolutely necessary — As mentioned, drugs — taken as prescribed — account for a majority of the 250,000 people who die from medical mistakes in the U.S. each year. A great many, if not most, diseases can be effectively addressed using simple lifestyle changes.
Key factors include diet, exercise and nonexercise movement, sleep and stress reduction. To investigate your options, you can search my database of tens of thousands of articles simply by entering your condition in the search engine.
Among the most lethal drugs right now are the opioids, which need to be used with extreme care and only in the short term. For treatment options, see “Treating Pain Without Drugs,” and “Study Reveals Previously Unknown Mechanism Behind Acupuncture’s Ability to Reduce Pain,” which also provides a long list of other drug-free pain relief strategies.
Tip #21Make Magnesium a Priority
from Articles http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/01/22/tips-to-avoid-medical-harm.aspx source https://niapurenaturecom.tumblr.com/post/182210854766
0 notes
jerrytackettca · 6 years
Text
Top Tips to Avoid Pharmaceutical Injury
30 Tips in 30 Days Designed to Help You Take Control of Your Health
This article is included in Dr. Mercola's All-Time Top 30 Health Tips series. Every day during the month of January, a new tip will be added that will help you take control of your health. Want to see the full list? Click here.
Vaccines have quickly become Big Pharma's most lucrative profit center. Currently valued at more than $34 billion a year, the vaccine industry is projected to exceed $49 billion by 2022.1 There are several reasons for this rapid growth. Not only are vaccines priced much higher than pills, but governments and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are also engaged in the marketing of vaccines.
These unethical partnerships, which use both taxpayer and NGO money, advance misleading research intended to frighten the public. Worse, they discredit vaccine critics who raise legitimate safety and efficacy questions and even discredit the families and victims of vaccine injuries themselves.
To cash in on vaccine profits, Big Pharma, governments and NGOs have cast all vaccines as "life-saving." One of the clearest examples is the attempt to present the HPV vaccine as an "anticancer" vaccine, even though there's not a single shred of evidence that it actually has an impact on cervical cancer rates. Meanwhile, mounting evidence of serious harm and death caused by the HPV vaccine is being ignored or cast aside as "coincidental."
To Avoid Vaccine Injury, Educate Yourself About the Risks
The official stance repeated by most mainstream media is that vaccines have been thoroughly researched, that "hundreds" of studies have proven their safety, and that no link between vaccines and health problems, such as autism, have ever been found.
It sounds definitive enough, and is often repeated as established fact. Yet it's far from the whole truth. Importantly, the vaccine industry has long shied away from evaluating vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations to determine potential differences in general health outcomes.
The few independent scientists who have attempted such an investigation have little comfort to give to those who believe vaccines are essential for health, and mandatory use of vaccines by all children is the only way to protect society from disease.
Vaccine May Actually Be Doing More Harm Than Good
One such study,2 published in 2017, examined health outcomes among infants 3 to 5 months old following the introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccine in Guinea-Bissau, which took place in the early 1980s. This population offered the rare opportunity to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children due to the way the vaccines were rolled out in the West African country.
Shockingly, researchers discovered "DTP was associated with fivefold higher mortality than being unvaccinated." According to the authors, "All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis."
In short, the researchers concluded that DTP vaccine weakened the children's immune systems, rendering them vulnerable to a whole host of other often deadly diseases and serious health problems.
In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommends that children receive 69 doses of 16 vaccines by the time they're 18 years old, with 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before the age of 6.3
This, despite the fact that no thorough investigation has ever been conducted to determine how all of these vaccines actually affect a child's health. What's worse, no one is tracking the health outcomes of children who adhere to the federally recommended childhood vaccine schedule and state mandatory vaccination programs.
Lawyers with the U.S. Justice Department also defend vaccines in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP), commonly referred to as "vaccine court," which means the U.S. government has a stake in maintaining the illusion that vaccines are a necessary lifesaving measure that causes minimal harm.
High Vaccination Rate Does Not Translate Into Better Infant Health
What we do know is that:
• The U.S. has the highest vaccination rate in the world, with 94 to 96 percent of children entering kindergarten having received multiple doses of vaccines4
• The U.S. also has one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates of any developed nation5,6
• 1 in 6 American children has a developmental disability, which includes ADD, ADHD, autism, hearing loss, learning disabilities, mental disabilities, seizures and stammering — many of which are also listed or known side effects of vaccines
• 54 percent of children have a diagnosed chronic illness, including anxiety, asthma, behavioral problems, bone and muscle disorders, chronic ear infections, depression, diabetes, food and/or environmental allergies and epilepsy.
This list again mirrors many of the acknowledged side effects of vaccines, and the rise in prevalence of these diseases parallel the rise in required vaccines, yet vaccine promoters insist that these illnesses are in no way associated with vaccinations
Common Vaccine Side Effects
Both the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court have also admitted that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe,"7 and possible side effects that are actually listed on vaccine inserts include:
Autoimmune diseases
Food allergies
Asthma
Eczema
Type 1 diabetes
Rheumatoid arthritis
Tics
Tourette syndrome
ADD/ADHD
Autism
Speech delay
Neurodevelopment disorders
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
Seizure disorder
Narcolepsy
Vaccines also have the highest number of recalls of any drug, which speaks to their "unavoidably unsafe" nature. Victims have also received compensation from the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) for the following (and other) injuries:
Guillain-Barre syndrome
Transverse myelitis
Encephalopathy
Seizure disorder hypoxic seizure
Death
Brachial neuritis
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
Premature ovarian failure
Bell's palsy
Type 1 diabetes
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
Rheumatic arthritis
Multiple sclerosis
Fibromyalgia
Anaphylaxis
Ocular myasthenia gravis
Infantile spasms
The Vaccines-Autism Link Revived
According to the latest survey,8,9 1 in 40 American children between the ages of 3 and 17 is now on the autism spectrum. This shocking update was published in the journal Pediatrics in December 2018. In 2014, the rate was 1 in 59; in 2010, it was 1 in 68; in 2000, it was 1 in 150.10 To say we're looking at exponential growth would be an understatement. But do vaccines have anything to do with this trend?
According to a Full Measure report11 by award-winning investigative reporter and former CBS correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a pediatric neurologist, was the pro-vaccine expert witness the government used to debunk and turn down autism claims in vaccine court.
"Zimmerman was the government's top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn't cause autism. The debate was declared over," Attkisson reports. "But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information.
He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children. That turnabout from the government's own chief medical expert stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate. If the public were to find out …
And he has come forward and explained how he told the United States government vaccines can cause autism in a certain subset of children and [the] United States government, the Department of Justice [DOJ], suppressed his true opinions."
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman of The World Mercury Project, was the one who convinced Zimmerman to speak out about the cover-up. In a sworn affidavit, dated September 7, 2018, Zimmerman states that, in 2007, he told DOJ lawyers he had "discovered exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism."
"I explained that in a subset of children … vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation … did cause regressive [brain disease] with features of autism spectrum disorder," Zimmerman writes.
A week after this 2007 meeting, the DOJ fired him, saying his services would no longer be needed. According to Zimmerman, the DOJ then went on to misrepresent his opinion in future cases, making no mention of the exceptions he'd informed them of. Kennedy has now filed a fraud complaint with the DOJ Inspector General.
William Thompson, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the CDC's National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, has also confessed to covering up links found between vaccines and autism, in this case the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
According to Thompson, this scientific fraud was committed for the express purpose of covering up potential safety problems so the agency would be able to maintain that the MMR vaccine had been proven safe to give to all children. By eliminating the incriminating data, the link vanished, and this research has been cited as proof ever since that vaccines don't cause autism.
Attkisson's report also reveals how Congressmen who wanted to investigate the autism-vaccine link were bullied, harassed and threatened. Dan Burton (R-IN), Dr. Dave Weldon (R-FL) and Bill Posey (R-FL) are among 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who told Attkisson they were warned to drop the vaccine safety issue by PhRMA lobbyists.
Vaccines Can Have Serious Consequences for Adults Too
While children are more susceptible to vaccine damage than adults, grownups can and have been seriously injured and killed by routine vaccinations as well. It's important to realize that no vaccine is 100 percent safe for everyone. As reported by CNN, an oncologist with London's Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust recently died following a routine yellow fever vaccination:12
"Martin Gore, 67, died Thursday morning after receiving the vaccine, which is recommended to travelers visiting sub-Saharan Africa, most of South America, and parts of Central American and the Caribbean …
Gore's death casts light on the heightened risk associated with the yellow fever vaccine and the over-60 demographic. Typical side effects of the vaccine include headaches, muscle pain, mild fever and soreness at the injection site …
However, the vaccinations can, in rare circumstances, cause more severe side effects, including allergic reactions and problems affecting the brain or organs …
The WHO reported that all cases of viscerotropic disease — a rare but dangerous side effect of yellow fever vaccinations where an illness similar to wild-type yellow fever proliferates in multiple organs — have occurred in primary vaccines, starting two to five days after vaccination."
Might Vaccine Reaction Rate Be as High as 1 in 10?
In the video above, Del Bigtree,13 an Emmy Award-winning producer of "The Doctors" talk show for six years, and one of the producers of the documentary, "Vaxxed," discusses vaccine safety, or rather the lack thereof.
In it, he recounts how, in 2010, the CDC hired a company to automate the federal vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) in such a way that any potential vaccine reactions reported to doctors participating in the Harvard Pilgrim HMO would automatically be uploaded into the VAERS database.
Remarkably, preliminary data showed that out of 376,452 individuals given 45 different vaccines, 35,570 possible vaccine reactions were identified. This means nearly 1 in 10 people suffered a reaction after vaccination concerning enough to be reported, yet the official CDC mantra is that the risk for serious vaccine injury or death is 1 in 1 million.
Unfortunately, while the creation of VAERS in 1986 was an opportunity to get a firmer grasp of the number of potential vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths occurring after vaccinations given in the U.S., the CDC didn't follow through, and the project fell by the wayside.
Medical Errors Are the Third Leading Cause of Death in the US
While I've focused a lot of attention on vaccines and the necessity for educating yourself about their risks in this article, vaccines are by far not the only hazard presented by the medical industry. In fact, medical errors in general are the third leading cause of death, killing an estimated 250,000 Americans each year,14,15 an increase of about 25,000 people annually from data published in 2000.16
Side effects from drugs, taken as prescribed, account for the vast majority of iatrogenic deaths, but unnecessary surgeries, medication errors in hospitals, hospital-acquired infections and other medical errors occurring in hospitals also claim their fair share of lives.
Research17 published in 2013 estimated that preventable hospital errors kill 210,000 Americans each year — a figure that comes very close to the latest statistics. However, when deaths related to diagnostic errors, errors of omission, and failure to follow guidelines were included, the number skyrocketed to 440,000 preventable hospital deaths each year.
10 Tips to Avoid Medical Harm
How can you avoid becoming one of these statistics? Aside from educating yourself on the risks and benefits of vaccines, here are several additional suggestions:
Ask your doctor whether a recommended test and/or treatment is really necessary, and do your own homework — According to a report by the Institute of Medicine, an estimated 30 percent of all medical procedures, tests and medications may be unnecessary,18 any one of which can put you at risk for a potentially serious or lethal side effect.
An investigation19 by the Mayo Clinic published in 2013 also revealed between 40 and 78 percent of the medical testing, treatments and procedures you receive are of no benefit to you — or are actually harmful — as determined by clinical studies. To learn which tests and interventions may do more harm than good, browse through the Choosing Wisely website.20
Avoid hospitals unless absolutely necessary — According to 2011 statistics, 1 in 25 patients in the U.S. end up contracting some form of infection while in the hospital,21 and 205 Americans die from hospital-acquired infections each and every day.22
Do your due diligence before undergoing endoscopy — If you're having a colonoscopy or any other procedure using a flexible endoscope done, you can significantly reduce your risk of contracting an infection by asking the hospital or facility how the scope is cleaned, and which cleaning agent is used.
Some esophagoscopes and bronchoscopes have sterile sheaths with disposable air-water and biopsy channels, but many others do not, and must be cleaned between each use. If the hospital or clinic uses glutaraldehyde, or the brand name Cidex, cancel your appointment and go elsewhere.
About 80 percent of clinics use glutaraldehyde because it's a less expensive alternative; however, it does not do a good job of sterilizing the equipment. If they use peracetic acid, your likelihood of contracting an infection from a previous patient is slim.
To learn more about this, see my interview with David Lewis, Ph.D., in "How Improper Sterilization of Endoscopes Could Put Your Health at Risk."
Enlist a health care advocate — Once hospitalized, you're at risk for medical errors, so one of the best safeguards is to have someone there have someone there with you. It's important to have a personal advocate present to ask questions and take notes.
For every medication given in the hospital, ask questions such as: "What is this medication? What is it for? What's the dose?" Most people, doctors and nurses included, are more apt to go through that extra step of due diligence to make sure they're getting it right if they know they'll be questioned about it.
To learn more, listen to my interview with Dr. Andrew Saul in "What Hospitals Won't Tell You — Vital Strategies That Could Save Your Life," or pick up a copy of his book, "Hospitals and Health: Your Orthomolecular Guide to a Shorter Hospital Stay."
In it, he discusses the dangers of hospital stays, the type of patient that tends to get killed most frequently, and how you can protect your health and life in the event you have to be hospitalized. For example, reminding nurses and doctors to wash their hands and change gloves before touching you can go a long way toward avoiding contamination with potentially lethal microbes.
Do your own prep for surgery — If you or someone you know is scheduled for surgery, print out the WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual,23 which is part of the campaign "Safe Surgery Saves Lives." The checklist can be downloaded free of charge here. Print it out and bring it with you, as this can help you protect yourself, your family member or friend from preventable errors in care.
Know the most effective protocol for sepsis — Sepsis is a progressive disease process initiated by an aggressive, dysfunctional immune response to an infection in the bloodstream, which is why it's sometimes referred to as blood poisoning. Each year, an estimated 1 million Americans get sepsis24,25 and up to half of them die as a result.26,27,28
Symptoms of sepsis are often overlooked, even by health professionals, and without prompt treatment, the condition can be deadly.
Unfortunately, conventional treatments often fail, and most hospitals have yet to embrace the use of intravenous (IV) vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine,29 a treatment developed by Dr. Paul Marik, which has been shown to reduce sepsis mortality from 40 to a mere 8.5 percent.30,31 Common signs and symptoms of sepsis to watch out for include:32
A high fever
Inability to keep fluids down
Rapid heartbeat; rapid, shallow breathing and/or shortness of breath
Lethargy and/or confusion
Slurred speech, often resembling intoxication
Should a few or all of these be present, seek immediate medical attention to rule out sepsis. Also inform the medical staff that you suspect sepsis, as time is of the essence when it comes to treatment, and urge them to use Marik's protocol (currently the standard of care for sepsis at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, where Marik works). You can learn more about this protocol by following the hyperlink provided above.
Optimize your vitamin D instead of getting the flu vaccine — Research33,34 shows vitamin D optimization is a more effective flu prevention strategy than flu vaccination, reducing respiratory infections such as influenza by 50 percent in those with vitamin D blood levels below 10 ng/mL. People with higher vitamin D levels at baseline may reduce their risk by about 10 percent, which the researchers stated was about equal to the effect of flu vaccines.
Aside from vitamin D, loading up on vitamins B1 and C may go a long way toward keeping you healthy through the flu season and beyond. Influenza has also been successfully treated with high-dose vitamin C.35 Taking zinc lozenges at the first sign of a cold or flu can also be helpful.
Avoid antibiotics — Drugs are vastly overprescribed and misused, and this is particularly true for antibiotics. Avoid using them unless absolutely necessary, and remember they don't work for viral infections. Unnecessary use of antibiotics is one of the driving causes of antibiotic-resistant superbugs.
Turn a deaf ear to drug ads — While drug makers are required to inform consumers about potential side effects in their ads, they've perfected drug ad narration to make them less frightful.36
Avoid drugs, unless absolutely necessary — As mentioned, drugs — taken as prescribed — account for a majority of the 250,000 people who die from medical mistakes in the U.S. each year. A great many, if not most, diseases can be effectively addressed using simple lifestyle changes.
Key factors include diet, exercise and nonexercise movement, sleep and stress reduction. To investigate your options, you can search my database of tens of thousands of articles simply by entering your condition in the search engine.
Among the most lethal drugs right now are the opioids, which need to be used with extreme care and only in the short term. For treatment options, see "Treating Pain Without Drugs," and "Study Reveals Previously Unknown Mechanism Behind Acupuncture's Ability to Reduce Pain," which also provides a long list of other drug-free pain relief strategies.
Tip #21Make Magnesium a Priority
from http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/01/22/tips-to-avoid-medical-harm.aspx
source http://niapurenaturecom.weebly.com/blog/top-tips-to-avoid-pharmaceutical-injury
0 notes
jakehglover · 6 years
Text
Top Tips to Avoid Pharmaceutical Injury
30 Tips in 30 Days Designed to Help You Take Control of Your Health
This article is included in Dr. Mercola's All-Time Top 30 Health Tips series. Every day during the month of January, a new tip will be added that will help you take control of your health. Want to see the full list? Click here.
Vaccines have quickly become Big Pharma's most lucrative profit center. Currently valued at more than $34 billion a year, the vaccine industry is projected to exceed $49 billion by 2022.1 There are several reasons for this rapid growth. Not only are vaccines priced much higher than pills, but governments and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are also engaged in the marketing of vaccines.
These unethical partnerships, which use both taxpayer and NGO money, advance misleading research intended to frighten the public. Worse, they discredit vaccine critics who raise legitimate safety and efficacy questions and even discredit the families and victims of vaccine injuries themselves.
To cash in on vaccine profits, Big Pharma, governments and NGOs have cast all vaccines as "life-saving." One of the clearest examples is the attempt to present the HPV vaccine as an "anticancer" vaccine, even though there's not a single shred of evidence that it actually has an impact on cervical cancer rates. Meanwhile, mounting evidence of serious harm and death caused by the HPV vaccine is being ignored or cast aside as "coincidental."
To Avoid Vaccine Injury, Educate Yourself About the Risks
The official stance repeated by most mainstream media is that vaccines have been thoroughly researched, that "hundreds" of studies have proven their safety, and that no link between vaccines and health problems, such as autism, have ever been found.
It sounds definitive enough, and is often repeated as established fact. Yet it's far from the whole truth. Importantly, the vaccine industry has long shied away from evaluating vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations to determine potential differences in general health outcomes.
The few independent scientists who have attempted such an investigation have little comfort to give to those who believe vaccines are essential for health, and mandatory use of vaccines by all children is the only way to protect society from disease.
Vaccine May Actually Be Doing More Harm Than Good
One such study,2 published in 2017, examined health outcomes among infants 3 to 5 months old following the introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccine in Guinea-Bissau, which took place in the early 1980s. This population offered the rare opportunity to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children due to the way the vaccines were rolled out in the West African country.
Shockingly, researchers discovered "DTP was associated with fivefold higher mortality than being unvaccinated." According to the authors, "All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis."
In short, the researchers concluded that DTP vaccine weakened the children's immune systems, rendering them vulnerable to a whole host of other often deadly diseases and serious health problems.
In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommends that children receive 69 doses of 16 vaccines by the time they're 18 years old, with 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before the age of 6.3
This, despite the fact that no thorough investigation has ever been conducted to determine how all of these vaccines actually affect a child's health. What's worse, no one is tracking the health outcomes of children who adhere to the federally recommended childhood vaccine schedule and state mandatory vaccination programs.
Lawyers with the U.S. Justice Department also defend vaccines in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP), commonly referred to as "vaccine court," which means the U.S. government has a stake in maintaining the illusion that vaccines are a necessary lifesaving measure that causes minimal harm.
High Vaccination Rate Does Not Translate Into Better Infant Health
What we do know is that:
• The U.S. has the highest vaccination rate in the world, with 94 to 96 percent of children entering kindergarten having received multiple doses of vaccines4
• The U.S. also has one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates of any developed nation5,6
• 1 in 6 American children has a developmental disability, which includes ADD, ADHD, autism, hearing loss, learning disabilities, mental disabilities, seizures and stammering — many of which are also listed or known side effects of vaccines
• 54 percent of children have a diagnosed chronic illness, including anxiety, asthma, behavioral problems, bone and muscle disorders, chronic ear infections, depression, diabetes, food and/or environmental allergies and epilepsy.
This list again mirrors many of the acknowledged side effects of vaccines, and the rise in prevalence of these diseases parallel the rise in required vaccines, yet vaccine promoters insist that these illnesses are in no way associated with vaccinations
Common Vaccine Side Effects
Both the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court have also admitted that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe,"7 and possible side effects that are actually listed on vaccine inserts include:
Autoimmune diseases
Food allergies
Asthma
Eczema
Type 1 diabetes
Rheumatoid arthritis
Tics
Tourette syndrome
ADD/ADHD
Autism
Speech delay
Neurodevelopment disorders
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
Seizure disorder
Narcolepsy
Vaccines also have the highest number of recalls of any drug, which speaks to their "unavoidably unsafe" nature. Victims have also received compensation from the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) for the following (and other) injuries:
Guillain-Barre syndrome
Transverse myelitis
Encephalopathy
Seizure disorder hypoxic seizure
Death
Brachial neuritis
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
Premature ovarian failure
Bell's palsy
Type 1 diabetes
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
Rheumatic arthritis
Multiple sclerosis
Fibromyalgia
Anaphylaxis
Ocular myasthenia gravis
Infantile spasms
The Vaccines-Autism Link Revived
youtube
According to the latest survey,8,9 1 in 40 American children between the ages of 3 and 17 is now on the autism spectrum. This shocking update was published in the journal Pediatrics in December 2018. In 2014, the rate was 1 in 59; in 2010, it was 1 in 68; in 2000, it was 1 in 150.10 To say we're looking at exponential growth would be an understatement. But do vaccines have anything to do with this trend?
According to a Full Measure report11 by award-winning investigative reporter and former CBS correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a pediatric neurologist, was the pro-vaccine expert witness the government used to debunk and turn down autism claims in vaccine court.
"Zimmerman was the government's top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn't cause autism. The debate was declared over," Attkisson reports. "But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information.
He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children. That turnabout from the government's own chief medical expert stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate. If the public were to find out …
And he has come forward and explained how he told the United States government vaccines can cause autism in a certain subset of children and [the] United States government, the Department of Justice [DOJ], suppressed his true opinions."
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman of The World Mercury Project, was the one who convinced Zimmerman to speak out about the cover-up. In a sworn affidavit, dated September 7, 2018, Zimmerman states that, in 2007, he told DOJ lawyers he had "discovered exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism."
"I explained that in a subset of children … vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation … did cause regressive [brain disease] with features of autism spectrum disorder," Zimmerman writes.
A week after this 2007 meeting, the DOJ fired him, saying his services would no longer be needed. According to Zimmerman, the DOJ then went on to misrepresent his opinion in future cases, making no mention of the exceptions he'd informed them of. Kennedy has now filed a fraud complaint with the DOJ Inspector General.
William Thompson, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the CDC's National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, has also confessed to covering up links found between vaccines and autism, in this case the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
According to Thompson, this scientific fraud was committed for the express purpose of covering up potential safety problems so the agency would be able to maintain that the MMR vaccine had been proven safe to give to all children. By eliminating the incriminating data, the link vanished, and this research has been cited as proof ever since that vaccines don't cause autism.
Attkisson's report also reveals how Congressmen who wanted to investigate the autism-vaccine link were bullied, harassed and threatened. Dan Burton (R-IN), Dr. Dave Weldon (R-FL) and Bill Posey (R-FL) are among 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who told Attkisson they were warned to drop the vaccine safety issue by PhRMA lobbyists.
Vaccines Can Have Serious Consequences for Adults Too
While children are more susceptible to vaccine damage than adults, grownups can and have been seriously injured and killed by routine vaccinations as well. It's important to realize that no vaccine is 100 percent safe for everyone. As reported by CNN, an oncologist with London's Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust recently died following a routine yellow fever vaccination:12
"Martin Gore, 67, died Thursday morning after receiving the vaccine, which is recommended to travelers visiting sub-Saharan Africa, most of South America, and parts of Central American and the Caribbean …
Gore's death casts light on the heightened risk associated with the yellow fever vaccine and the over-60 demographic. Typical side effects of the vaccine include headaches, muscle pain, mild fever and soreness at the injection site …
However, the vaccinations can, in rare circumstances, cause more severe side effects, including allergic reactions and problems affecting the brain or organs …
The WHO reported that all cases of viscerotropic disease — a rare but dangerous side effect of yellow fever vaccinations where an illness similar to wild-type yellow fever proliferates in multiple organs — have occurred in primary vaccines, starting two to five days after vaccination."
Might Vaccine Reaction Rate Be as High as 1 in 10?
youtube
In the video above, Del Bigtree,13 an Emmy Award-winning producer of "The Doctors" talk show for six years, and one of the producers of the documentary, "Vaxxed," discusses vaccine safety, or rather the lack thereof.
In it, he recounts how, in 2010, the CDC hired a company to automate the federal vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) in such a way that any potential vaccine reactions reported to doctors participating in the Harvard Pilgrim HMO would automatically be uploaded into the VAERS database.
Remarkably, preliminary data showed that out of 376,452 individuals given 45 different vaccines, 35,570 possible vaccine reactions were identified. This means nearly 1 in 10 people suffered a reaction after vaccination concerning enough to be reported, yet the official CDC mantra is that the risk for serious vaccine injury or death is 1 in 1 million.
Unfortunately, while the creation of VAERS in 1986 was an opportunity to get a firmer grasp of the number of potential vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths occurring after vaccinations given in the U.S., the CDC didn't follow through, and the project fell by the wayside.
Medical Errors Are the Third Leading Cause of Death in the US
While I've focused a lot of attention on vaccines and the necessity for educating yourself about their risks in this article, vaccines are by far not the only hazard presented by the medical industry. In fact, medical errors in general are the third leading cause of death, killing an estimated 250,000 Americans each year,14,15 an increase of about 25,000 people annually from data published in 2000.16
Side effects from drugs, taken as prescribed, account for the vast majority of iatrogenic deaths, but unnecessary surgeries, medication errors in hospitals, hospital-acquired infections and other medical errors occurring in hospitals also claim their fair share of lives.
Research17 published in 2013 estimated that preventable hospital errors kill 210,000 Americans each year — a figure that comes very close to the latest statistics. However, when deaths related to diagnostic errors, errors of omission, and failure to follow guidelines were included, the number skyrocketed to 440,000 preventable hospital deaths each year.
10 Tips to Avoid Medical Harm
How can you avoid becoming one of these statistics? Aside from educating yourself on the risks and benefits of vaccines, here are several additional suggestions:
Ask your doctor whether a recommended test and/or treatment is really necessary, and do your own homework — According to a report by the Institute of Medicine, an estimated 30 percent of all medical procedures, tests and medications may be unnecessary,18 any one of which can put you at risk for a potentially serious or lethal side effect.
An investigation19 by the Mayo Clinic published in 2013 also revealed between 40 and 78 percent of the medical testing, treatments and procedures you receive are of no benefit to you — or are actually harmful — as determined by clinical studies. To learn which tests and interventions may do more harm than good, browse through the Choosing Wisely website.20
Avoid hospitals unless absolutely necessary — According to 2011 statistics, 1 in 25 patients in the U.S. end up contracting some form of infection while in the hospital,21 and 205 Americans die from hospital-acquired infections each and every day.22
Do your due diligence before undergoing endoscopy — If you're having a colonoscopy or any other procedure using a flexible endoscope done, you can significantly reduce your risk of contracting an infection by asking the hospital or facility how the scope is cleaned, and which cleaning agent is used.
Some esophagoscopes and bronchoscopes have sterile sheaths with disposable air-water and biopsy channels, but many others do not, and must be cleaned between each use. If the hospital or clinic uses glutaraldehyde, or the brand name Cidex, cancel your appointment and go elsewhere.
About 80 percent of clinics use glutaraldehyde because it's a less expensive alternative; however, it does not do a good job of sterilizing the equipment. If they use peracetic acid, your likelihood of contracting an infection from a previous patient is slim.
To learn more about this, see my interview with David Lewis, Ph.D., in "How Improper Sterilization of Endoscopes Could Put Your Health at Risk."
Enlist a health care advocate — Once hospitalized, you're at risk for medical errors, so one of the best safeguards is to have someone there have someone there with you. It's important to have a personal advocate present to ask questions and take notes.
For every medication given in the hospital, ask questions such as: "What is this medication? What is it for? What's the dose?" Most people, doctors and nurses included, are more apt to go through that extra step of due diligence to make sure they're getting it right if they know they'll be questioned about it.
To learn more, listen to my interview with Dr. Andrew Saul in "What Hospitals Won't Tell You — Vital Strategies That Could Save Your Life," or pick up a copy of his book, "Hospitals and Health: Your Orthomolecular Guide to a Shorter Hospital Stay."
In it, he discusses the dangers of hospital stays, the type of patient that tends to get killed most frequently, and how you can protect your health and life in the event you have to be hospitalized. For example, reminding nurses and doctors to wash their hands and change gloves before touching you can go a long way toward avoiding contamination with potentially lethal microbes.
Do your own prep for surgery — If you or someone you know is scheduled for surgery, print out the WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual,23 which is part of the campaign "Safe Surgery Saves Lives." The checklist can be downloaded free of charge here. Print it out and bring it with you, as this can help you protect yourself, your family member or friend from preventable errors in care.
Know the most effective protocol for sepsis — Sepsis is a progressive disease process initiated by an aggressive, dysfunctional immune response to an infection in the bloodstream, which is why it's sometimes referred to as blood poisoning. Each year, an estimated 1 million Americans get sepsis24,25 and up to half of them die as a result.26,27,28
Symptoms of sepsis are often overlooked, even by health professionals, and without prompt treatment, the condition can be deadly.
Unfortunately, conventional treatments often fail, and most hospitals have yet to embrace the use of intravenous (IV) vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine,29 a treatment developed by Dr. Paul Marik, which has been shown to reduce sepsis mortality from 40 to a mere 8.5 percent.30,31 Common signs and symptoms of sepsis to watch out for include:32
A high fever
Inability to keep fluids down
Rapid heartbeat; rapid, shallow breathing and/or shortness of breath
Lethargy and/or confusion
Slurred speech, often resembling intoxication
Should a few or all of these be present, seek immediate medical attention to rule out sepsis. Also inform the medical staff that you suspect sepsis, as time is of the essence when it comes to treatment, and urge them to use Marik's protocol (currently the standard of care for sepsis at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, where Marik works). You can learn more about this protocol by following the hyperlink provided above.
Optimize your vitamin D instead of getting the flu vaccine — Research33,34 shows vitamin D optimization is a more effective flu prevention strategy than flu vaccination, reducing respiratory infections such as influenza by 50 percent in those with vitamin D blood levels below 10 ng/mL. People with higher vitamin D levels at baseline may reduce their risk by about 10 percent, which the researchers stated was about equal to the effect of flu vaccines.
Aside from vitamin D, loading up on vitamins B1 and C may go a long way toward keeping you healthy through the flu season and beyond. Influenza has also been successfully treated with high-dose vitamin C.35 Taking zinc lozenges at the first sign of a cold or flu can also be helpful.
Avoid antibiotics — Drugs are vastly overprescribed and misused, and this is particularly true for antibiotics. Avoid using them unless absolutely necessary, and remember they don't work for viral infections. Unnecessary use of antibiotics is one of the driving causes of antibiotic-resistant superbugs.
Turn a deaf ear to drug ads — While drug makers are required to inform consumers about potential side effects in their ads, they've perfected drug ad narration to make them less frightful.36
Avoid drugs, unless absolutely necessary — As mentioned, drugs — taken as prescribed — account for a majority of the 250,000 people who die from medical mistakes in the U.S. each year. A great many, if not most, diseases can be effectively addressed using simple lifestyle changes.
Key factors include diet, exercise and nonexercise movement, sleep and stress reduction. To investigate your options, you can search my database of tens of thousands of articles simply by entering your condition in the search engine.
Among the most lethal drugs right now are the opioids, which need to be used with extreme care and only in the short term. For treatment options, see "Treating Pain Without Drugs," and "Study Reveals Previously Unknown Mechanism Behind Acupuncture's Ability to Reduce Pain," which also provides a long list of other drug-free pain relief strategies.
Tip #21Make Magnesium a Priority
from HealthyLife via Jake Glover on Inoreader http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/01/22/tips-to-avoid-medical-harm.aspx
0 notes
davidoespailla · 6 years
Text
One Year On, These Housing Markets Are the Winners and Losers of U.S. Tax Reform
Pola Damonte via Getty Images
The average luxury homeowner in Williamson County, Tennessee, part of greater Nashville, has watched the value of his or her house steadily rise more than 10% over the past year—outperforming the general U.S. housing market and due, in part, to federal tax reform enacted one year ago.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective on Jan. 1, 2018, has drawn clear winners and losers among America’s luxury housing markets. The new rules are making states with no income tax, including Tennessee, Florida, Texas and Washington, attractive to affluent individuals who expect their tax liability to rise, while dampening sales and price growth in regions of the U.S. that levy high state and local taxes.
“At this point most people know the parameters of the tax plan,” said Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com. “The luxury data already reflects this, and it’s the first place where we expected see it.”
For most individuals, the full impact of the new rules will be felt for the first time when people file returns under the new rules this tax season. Armed with more clarity, affluent homebuyers will continue to drive the dichotomy between low- and high-tax markets in opposite directions in 2019.
The Winners
Low-tax Florida, which was already a bastion for retirees and ex-pro athletes, is one such winner.
Over the past year, counties across the Sunshine State have upended a list of the fastest-growing luxury markets compiled monthly by Realtor.com, replacing areas such as Brooklyn and Queens, New York, and California’s San Francisco’s Bay Area, which all dominated the luxury rankings only a year ago.
“South Florida along with the oceanside, starting with Miami and moving up the shore, remarkably are showing rising sales and rising prices,” said Jonathan Miller, a New York-based real estate appraiser who tracks a handful of key luxury U.S. markets. “I expect that is related to the tax law.”
Million-dollar-plus home sales have soared more than 20% since last year in six Florida counties, including Sarasota; Broward, which encompasses Fort Lauderdale; and Orange, which includes Orlando, according to data from Realtor.com, which, like Mansion Global, is part of News Corp.
Anecdotally, real estate agents have attributed the luxury boom to buyers from high-cost areas in the U.S. such as New York, Connecticut and even California flocking to Florida. “The Northeast is Florida’s new foreign buyer,” Mr. Miller said.
Other luxury markets riding high with help from the tax overhaul include Tarrant County, Texas, north of Dallas, where million-dollar-plus sales skyrocketed 47.2% in 2018, according to the latest data from Realtor. Luxury homeowners in Snohomish, Washington—which also boasts no state income tax—have seen prices rise 12.3% in the past year. Realtor defines luxury as the top 5% of sales.
The Losers
Rather than causing a mass exodus from the less advantageous locations, the tax changes are likely exaggerating a trend that was already underway. The scale of migration to low-tax areas like Fort Lauderdale and Nashville since the tax reform won’t be clear until late next year, when the Census Bureau releases 2018 state-to-state data, said Nicole Kaeding, federal projects director at the Tax Foundation, a think tank in Washington, D.C.
It seems unlikely that taxpayers would uproot over a few thousand dollars, Ms. Kaeding said. Rather, it’s the marginal cases where the new rules hit wealthy individuals much harder.
Roughly 80% of all U.S. taxpayers got a tax cut under the new code, while 15% will see no meaningful change, Ms. Kaeding said.
Only 5% will see their taxes increase, a minority made up of filers whose income is over $500,000 per year and who pay significant sums in state and local income tax, also known as SALT, Ms. Kaeding said. The new tax code limits the SALT deduction to only $10,000, peanuts compared to the tens of thousands of dollars some in high-tax areas pay each year.
“This is someone like a New York attorney. If you’re a partner in a New York law firm, you have to pay income tax in every state where the firm works,” Ms. Kaeding said. Such a person might have written off over $100,000 in SALT under the old system. “Now the cap on the SALT deduction could mean you’re paying more in taxes.”
Even the average tax filer in Manhattan deducted a whopping $25,627 in SALT from their federal tax bill in 2016, according to the most recent data analyzed by the think tank. Californians living in Marin County, north of San Francisco, took an average deduction worth $19,334.
The new tax law also reduced the amount luxury home buyers can deduct in mortgage interest for loans taken out from 2018 onward. It’s not as huge a hit as the SALT deduction limits, but combined, the two tax changes effectively raised the cost of living and owning a home in places such as New York City, New Jersey (where residents pay some of the highest property taxes in the country), Connecticut, Washington, D.C., California and Illinois.
In all those places, home values are expected to fall as buyers and sellers adjust to the new cost of living.
Exacerbating the Slowdown
Coincidentally, President Donald Trump’s major legislative victory has deeply exacerbated the housing rout in his own hometown. Manhattan’s luxury housing market was already in the midst of a price correction when Congress passed the new tax code, which combined with rising interest rates, dramatically slowed the pace of sales in 2018—including at Trump Tower, where the president keeps a lavish triplex penthouse.
Sales of homes for $1 million or more in Manhattan have dropped 12.5% from a year ago, according to data from Realtor. In Brooklyn, such sales have slowed 8.6% during the same time period.
In Suffolk County, New York, home to the Hamptons’ posh beach towns, million-dollar-plus sales slid 16.3% since last year, as home buyers shift their vacation house hunts southward.
Manhattan-based realtor Donna Olshan, who publishes a weekly report on luxury transactions, said she expects sellers in the borough will have to discount their homes roughly another 10% to entice buyers off the sidelines.
Besides Manhattan, one need only map wealthy districts that voted out their incumbent Republican in November to find high-end housing markets feeling down on the tax reform.
Such areas include Chicago’s wealthy suburbs, where voters ousted two Republican representatives in favor of their rookie Democratic opponents.
While there’s certainly more at play in the Chicago suburbs than tax and housing woes, the correlation is undeniable. Lake County, Illinois, which includes portions of both congressional districts, has seen luxury home prices stagnate in 2018 and sales plummet. The number of houses sold for $1 million or more in Lake County fell by one-fifth in 2018, according to the Realtor data.
Fairfax County, Virginia, where both luxury home values and sales declined in 2018, voted overwhelming for the Democrat, underdog Jennifer Wexton, and helped unseat a Republican incumbent who voted for the tax reform.
Voters also flipped six house seats from high-tax, high-income California. Most notable was Orange County, a longtime Republican stronghold that helped unseat 15-term Republican incumbent Dana Rohrabacher.
“The tax reform has not been a positive thing for our market,” said John Stanaland, a leading real estate agent in Orange County, a wealthy coastal area that includes posh Laguna Beach. “It’s been a factor in the market slowing.”
There has been a significant drop-off in showings and sales, particularly for mid-range luxury homes priced between $2 million to $4 million, Mr. Stanaland said.
In contrast to Florida, high state and local taxes in Orange County have dissuaded wealthy homebuyers from making the area their primary residence.
“We used to be about a 20% second-home market. I think we’re over 40% now,” Mr. Stanaland said. The new tax code “is not necessarily a hardship, but it really annoys people.”
The post One Year On, These Housing Markets Are the Winners and Losers of U.S. Tax Reform appeared first on Real Estate News & Insights | realtor.com®.
One Year On, These Housing Markets Are the Winners and Losers of U.S. Tax Reform
0 notes
Text
One Year On, These Housing Markets Are the Winners and Losers of U.S. Tax Reform
Pola Damonte via Getty Images
The average luxury homeowner in Williamson County, Tennessee, part of greater Nashville, has watched the value of his or her house steadily rise more than 10% over the past year—outperforming the general U.S. housing market and due, in part, to federal tax reform enacted one year ago.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective on Jan. 1, 2018, has drawn clear winners and losers among America’s luxury housing markets. The new rules are making states with no income tax, including Tennessee, Florida, Texas and Washington, attractive to affluent individuals who expect their tax liability to rise, while dampening sales and price growth in regions of the U.S. that levy high state and local taxes.
“At this point most people know the parameters of the tax plan,” said Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com. “The luxury data already reflects this, and it’s the first place where we expected see it.”
For most individuals, the full impact of the new rules will be felt for the first time when people file returns under the new rules this tax season. Armed with more clarity, affluent homebuyers will continue to drive the dichotomy between low- and high-tax markets in opposite directions in 2019.
The Winners
Low-tax Florida, which was already a bastion for retirees and ex-pro athletes, is one such winner.
Over the past year, counties across the Sunshine State have upended a list of the fastest-growing luxury markets compiled monthly by Realtor.com, replacing areas such as Brooklyn and Queens, New York, and California’s San Francisco’s Bay Area, which all dominated the luxury rankings only a year ago.
“South Florida along with the oceanside, starting with Miami and moving up the shore, remarkably are showing rising sales and rising prices,” said Jonathan Miller, a New York-based real estate appraiser who tracks a handful of key luxury U.S. markets. “I expect that is related to the tax law.”
Million-dollar-plus home sales have soared more than 20% since last year in six Florida counties, including Sarasota; Broward, which encompasses Fort Lauderdale; and Orange, which includes Orlando, according to data from Realtor.com, which, like Mansion Global, is part of News Corp.
Anecdotally, real estate agents have attributed the luxury boom to buyers from high-cost areas in the U.S. such as New York, Connecticut and even California flocking to Florida. “The Northeast is Florida’s new foreign buyer,” Mr. Miller said.
Other luxury markets riding high with help from the tax overhaul include Tarrant County, Texas, north of Dallas, where million-dollar-plus sales skyrocketed 47.2% in 2018, according to the latest data from Realtor. Luxury homeowners in Snohomish, Washington—which also boasts no state income tax—have seen prices rise 12.3% in the past year. Realtor defines luxury as the top 5% of sales.
The Losers
Rather than causing a mass exodus from the less advantageous locations, the tax changes are likely exaggerating a trend that was already underway. The scale of migration to low-tax areas like Fort Lauderdale and Nashville since the tax reform won’t be clear until late next year, when the Census Bureau releases 2018 state-to-state data, said Nicole Kaeding, federal projects director at the Tax Foundation, a think tank in Washington, D.C.
It seems unlikely that taxpayers would uproot over a few thousand dollars, Ms. Kaeding said. Rather, it’s the marginal cases where the new rules hit wealthy individuals much harder.
Roughly 80% of all U.S. taxpayers got a tax cut under the new code, while 15% will see no meaningful change, Ms. Kaeding said.
Only 5% will see their taxes increase, a minority made up of filers whose income is over $500,000 per year and who pay significant sums in state and local income tax, also known as SALT, Ms. Kaeding said. The new tax code limits the SALT deduction to only $10,000, peanuts compared to the tens of thousands of dollars some in high-tax areas pay each year.
“This is someone like a New York attorney. If you’re a partner in a New York law firm, you have to pay income tax in every state where the firm works,” Ms. Kaeding said. Such a person might have written off over $100,000 in SALT under the old system. “Now the cap on the SALT deduction could mean you’re paying more in taxes.”
Even the average tax filer in Manhattan deducted a whopping $25,627 in SALT from their federal tax bill in 2016, according to the most recent data analyzed by the think tank. Californians living in Marin County, north of San Francisco, took an average deduction worth $19,334.
The new tax law also reduced the amount luxury home buyers can deduct in mortgage interest for loans taken out from 2018 onward. It’s not as huge a hit as the SALT deduction limits, but combined, the two tax changes effectively raised the cost of living and owning a home in places such as New York City, New Jersey (where residents pay some of the highest property taxes in the country), Connecticut, Washington, D.C., California and Illinois.
In all those places, home values are expected to fall as buyers and sellers adjust to the new cost of living.
Exacerbating the Slowdown
Coincidentally, President Donald Trump’s major legislative victory has deeply exacerbated the housing rout in his own hometown. Manhattan’s luxury housing market was already in the midst of a price correction when Congress passed the new tax code, which combined with rising interest rates, dramatically slowed the pace of sales in 2018—including at Trump Tower, where the president keeps a lavish triplex penthouse.
Sales of homes for $1 million or more in Manhattan have dropped 12.5% from a year ago, according to data from Realtor. In Brooklyn, such sales have slowed 8.6% during the same time period.
In Suffolk County, New York, home to the Hamptons’ posh beach towns, million-dollar-plus sales slid 16.3% since last year, as home buyers shift their vacation house hunts southward.
Manhattan-based realtor Donna Olshan, who publishes a weekly report on luxury transactions, said she expects sellers in the borough will have to discount their homes roughly another 10% to entice buyers off the sidelines.
Besides Manhattan, one need only map wealthy districts that voted out their incumbent Republican in November to find high-end housing markets feeling down on the tax reform.
Such areas include Chicago’s wealthy suburbs, where voters ousted two Republican representatives in favor of their rookie Democratic opponents.
While there’s certainly more at play in the Chicago suburbs than tax and housing woes, the correlation is undeniable. Lake County, Illinois, which includes portions of both congressional districts, has seen luxury home prices stagnate in 2018 and sales plummet. The number of houses sold for $1 million or more in Lake County fell by one-fifth in 2018, according to the Realtor data.
Fairfax County, Virginia, where both luxury home values and sales declined in 2018, voted overwhelming for the Democrat, underdog Jennifer Wexton, and helped unseat a Republican incumbent who voted for the tax reform.
Voters also flipped six house seats from high-tax, high-income California. Most notable was Orange County, a longtime Republican stronghold that helped unseat 15-term Republican incumbent Dana Rohrabacher.
“The tax reform has not been a positive thing for our market,” said John Stanaland, a leading real estate agent in Orange County, a wealthy coastal area that includes posh Laguna Beach. “It’s been a factor in the market slowing.”
There has been a significant drop-off in showings and sales, particularly for mid-range luxury homes priced between $2 million to $4 million, Mr. Stanaland said.
In contrast to Florida, high state and local taxes in Orange County have dissuaded wealthy homebuyers from making the area their primary residence.
“We used to be about a 20% second-home market. I think we’re over 40% now,” Mr. Stanaland said. The new tax code “is not necessarily a hardship, but it really annoys people.”
The post One Year On, These Housing Markets Are the Winners and Losers of U.S. Tax Reform appeared first on Real Estate News & Insights | realtor.com®.
from DIYS http://bit.ly/2QfZPyA
0 notes
stuffminusthings · 6 years
Text
Dear Montana Family,
Dear Montana Family,
It was nice to see you on your visit to the U.P. For the first time in a minute it was nice to see some family. I'm sorry if our conversations may have seemed a bit forced, but since this life is short, I'll do away with some of my remorse.
You asked me how my novel was going. A sign that you paid enough attention to me to read the headlines somewhere in 2014. There's been a bit since then, but, I'll catch you up.
When I last left writing my novel in Socorro, New Mexico, it was because I hadn't been able to write for two weeks. I kept telling myself it was unfocused attention, and a lack of discipline. I was in an agitated state when I arrived in New Mexico, a last ditch effort at avoiding the School Loan creditors. They had been systematically tracking down my old employers and requesting that they hold payments. When they finally got to the construction company in Missoula where I was working I wouldn't have a way to eat, so I left, with a goal of living on a bicycle (rent and expense free) until I wrote something I could actually get paid for.
It was that or the oil fields, and in New Mexico, just before my writer's block stopped my novel, I got a phone call.
My school loans were to be paid. That's it, that's all, go on with your life now.
Every single time I had trouble writing before that moment, was due to the fact that my phone never stopped ringing from the school loan creditors.
“Can't you just get another job?” They'd ask me while I was in Boulder between Santiago and Salt Lake City. Because there are so many part time jobs with international requirements.
It was time spent figuring out how to pay my bills instead of doing my job that lead me to a trailer in New Mexico in the first place, and now that I didn't have that, writing stopped making sense. I became agitated, and my sleep deteriorated. All of my clothing felt scratchy.
Maybe I wasn't supposed to write a novel. I couldn't go five minutes without having a melt down.
Maybe this was my chance to be a Ski Journalist finally, that's how I tried to pay my bills the first time.
In my madness, I stopped thinking about writing my novel and started thinking about the ways I wanted to make money. Being a ski writer was fun. Now that I only had to pay for myself, I could finally afford to do it.
And then I was diagnosed with bed bugs.
After being driven to the brink of insanity, driving away from New Mexico and my writer's block couldn't happen quickly enough. I was offered a part of a magazine for my work, and having faith in my ability to work, I dove straight in.
After a winter of starving myself in a van I didn't get paid back for until I got kicked out of it, I took a part time job in advertising, because nobody wants to deal with a hangry person while they are skiing.
Being hangry is the opposite of why people go skiing. Skiing happens because there is too much comfort and enjoyment that it becomes restricting. Skiing is creative dissonance. Jazz instead of the marching band.
The point is that it's still making music, not a mess.
It takes understanding and/or intuition to value music, and it takes security to follow your intuitions. Up until that point in my life I really, really, lacked understanding. And money.
So when a job that actually paid money came up, conveniently close to my mom's house where I could live rent free, I took it. It was part time on the books, but I was allowed to work up to 40 hours a week on-record, and beyond that was up to me.
I'd been working for much less for much longer, so working overtime for free didn't phase me at all, especially in my Mom's home area, where coincidentally, I was also born.
The cost of living—bar tab included—in Marquette, Michigan affords more quality of life than anywhere I've ever lived. But the locals haven't left, so they don't really get it. They know everything they've seen on TV, and TV doesn't talk back to them, so nothing they know is wrong. Not really mixing with the locals never bothered me, I was still trying to write a book. I'd given up my dreams of ever ski-writing ever again, it was just advertising skis, and no longer exploring a way of life. Getting people to explore the way of life in Marquette, to me, at least put money in people's pocket's before corporate profits rose.
But I still wanted to Ski. Or slide down hill at least. I discovered powder surfing at the end of my ski-writing career in Montana, and bought one when I moved to Michigan. I could finally afford to buy my own, and when I found out how much fun I was having by myself, I bought another so that other people could join the fun.
Summer came and I had spent a whole year ignoring my novel. I was too excited about the possibilities of powder-surfing. If people spent this much time exploring their own back yards, maybe we'd finally get the litter situation under control. Maybe we'd finally meet each-other in person instead of just knowing each other online. A surf board cost less than most cell phones, and that was all anybody needed to get started after it snows.
That good feeling, the one every advertisement tells you about, is just a turn away. And although there is no right way to do it, sometimes that good feeling is great. And you're the only one who is ever gonna feel it, just for a moment, and then it's on to the next. Or on to lunch, or work, or whatever.
I wanted to write a book about freedom, but it took me doing something nobody ever asked me to do to finally feel it. And once I felt it, I began to feel like writing was a waste of time.
The revolution won't be televised. It won't be online. It won't be in print.
For the revolution of freedom to occur, it must be felt. And for the majority of us, feeling anything requires some movement first. It takes a well-exercised imagination to conjure feelings on it's own.
All we had to do was snurf I thought. With an expendable income and some friends, I bought 6 powder surfers worth of materials, some tools, and decided I would begin spreading the word people weren't financially equipped to experience myself. If they liked it—I knew they would—they could buy their own powder surfers afterwards.
I felt on top of the world when I took a week's worth of paid vacation to test them out in a freak snowstorm at the beginning of October, now a full 2 years after I left my novel.
When my boards worked well enough to slide on, I decided to do the right thing, and get serious about my job, which paid for me to make my boards. I got a raise and promoted to full time and salary.
It was then, my mom asked me how my novel was going, and I told her that I didn't have a story anyone would listen to, and that I needed to finish my own story first.
And then there was that car accident where-according to my family-I'm doing jut fine from.
And so despite the fact that it took me months of teaching myself to re-interpret the world because my optometrist didn't want to deal with me because I was coming down off fentanyl—he thought I was a junkie—I've sort of managed to put the world back together in a way that makes sense if you only read the headlines. I don’t need to talk about the broken vertebrae or the torn muscles, that make even sitting in a stuffed couch uncomfortable, that’s complaining too much. Way too much.
Right there it's clear to me that I don't have anything worth saying that can't be summed up in the headlines.
He got in a car accident. He's Fucked. I wouldn't do what he's doing. Hell I wouldn't have done any of the things he did.
And so there's no point in reading any further. I haven't finished my novel, because there's nothing to say.
Do what you're told and everything will be fine.
As for me, well, I’m going to keep moving the only way I see how.
0 notes
papermoonloveslucy · 6 years
Text
LUCY: 40 YEARS OF TELEVISION
1957
Tumblr media
The second half of season six moves the show to Connecticut but means the end of the half-hour episodes.  
"Lucy and the Loving Cup" (ILL S6;E12) ~ January 7, 1957
Tumblr media
Jockey Johnny Longden (and his wife) guest star in an episode that takes Lucy on the New York City subway! Lucille Ball had claustrophobia, so the loving cup was designed with eye holes in the design. Filmed November 1, 1956. 
“The Jackie Gleason Show: At 65" ~ January 12, 1957
Tumblr media
This program was a tribute to Eddie Cantor upon reaching his 65th birthday (which is actually a few weeks later). Lucille had done Roman Scandals (1933)  with Cantor. Burns and Allen and Red Skelton also appeared. Coincidentally, Lucille Ball was on the cover of TV Guide that week. 
"Lucy and Superman" (ILL S6;E13) ~ January 14, 1957
Tumblr media
George Reeves guest-stars as his television superhero character, but receives no screen credit in order to preserve the fantasy for children Little Ricky’s age. Also featuring George O’Hanlon (George Jetson of “The Jetsons”) and Madge Blake (Aunt Harriet of “Batman”). Colorized for broadcast in 2015. Originally filmed November 15, 1956. 
"Little Ricky Gets a Dog" (ILL S6;E14) ~ January 21, 1957
Tumblr media
Fred the dog was played by a Cairn Terrier whose real name was Danny. He was trained by Bob Blair and was owned by Frank Inn. Noted voice artist June Foray provided his bark (uncredited) for this episode. Filmed November 8, 1956. 
"Lucy Wants to Move to the Country" (ILL S6;E15) ~ January 28, 1957
Tumblr media
Starting with this episode, the show begins a storyline about the move to Connecticut, although the exact town won’t be revealed until two weeks later. Eleanor Audley and Frank Wilcox play the Spauldings, who own the home the Ricardos buy. Filmed December 6, 1956.
"Lucy Hates to Leave" (ILL S6;E16) ~ February 6, 1957
Tumblr media
The last time Lucy and viewers will see the Ricardo apartment. After six years, the show indulges in a rare moment of sentimentality. Filmed December 13, 1956. 
"Lucy Misses the Mertzes" (ILL S6;E17) ~ February 11, 1957
Tumblr media
This is the first episode to mention the exact Connecticut town the Ricardos have moved to: Westport. This marks the only mention of rock and roll phenomenon Elvis Presley on the series. The last episode filmed (December 20, 1956) before the holiday break.  
"Lucy Gets Chummy With the Neighbors" (ILL S6;E18) ~ February 18, 1957
Tumblr media
Frank Nelson and Mary Jane Croft are introduced as Westport neighbors The Ramseys. Betty and Ralph have a son, Bruce, played by Ray Ferrell. The episode is best remembered for Lucy’s overspending at the furniture store. Filmed January 10, 1957. 
"Lucy Raises Chickens" (ILL S6;E19) ~ March 4, 1957
Tumblr media
Unfortunately, a few baby chicks WERE harmed in the making of this episode.  This is the first episode sponsored by Ford Motor Company. Filmed January 17, 1957.  
"Lucy Does the Tango" (ILL S6;E20) ~ March 11, 1957
Tumblr media
The longest laugh ever recorded on the series - but it is trimmed for broadcast. During Lucille’s rehearsals for this bit hard boiled eggs were used instead of raw. Filmed February 7, 1957.  
“The 9th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards” ~ March 16, 1957
Tumblr media
Desi Arnaz hosted the event, aired on NBC. Perhaps this honor was due to the fact that once again he was the only cast member of “I Love Lucy” not nominated. Lucy lost to Nanette Fabray (”Caesar’s Hour”). Pat Carroll and Carl Reiner (also from “Caesar’s Hour”) bested Bill Frawley and Vivian Vance.  
"Ragtime Band" (ILL S6;E21) ~ March 18, 1957
Tumblr media
Lucy gets to play the sax again, while Ethel plays the piano and Fred the violin (a new skill for him), but instead of a ragtime band, the show ends with a calypso band - singing  “Man Smart (Woman Smarter)”.  Filmed Valentine’s Day 1957. 
"Lucy's Night in Town" (ILL S6;E22) ~ March 25, 1957
Tumblr media
Desilu was a major investor in the new musical The Most Happy Fella, so “I Love Lucy” promoted the show by having the Ricardos and Mertzes go to Broadway. Although no stage actors were seen on camera, songs from the original cast album were heard. Joseph Kearns returns to the series as the (Imperial) theatre manager. Filmed February 21, 1957. 
"Housewarming" (ILL S6;E23) ~ April 1, 1957
Tumblr media
A newly-installed intercom causes a major misunderstanding at the Ricardo home. Filmed February 28, 1957.  
"Building a B-B-Q" (ILL S6;E24) ~ April 8, 1957
Tumblr media
Lucy’s missing wedding ring is in the newly built (and then rebuilt) B-B-Q. Or is it?  Filmed March 14, 1957. 
"Country Club Dance" (ILL S6;E25) ~ April 22, 1957
Tumblr media
Barbara Eden (”I Dream of Jeannie”) made one of her first TV appearances with this episode. Filmed March 21, 1957.  
"Lucy Raises Tulips" (ILL S6;E26) ~ April 29, 1957
Tumblr media
Lucy runs rampant on a run-away lawn mower. Eleanor Audley returns as one of the judges of the tulip-growing contest. Filmed March 28, 1957.  
"The Ricardos Dedicate a Statue" (ILL S6;E27) ~ May 6, 1957 
Tumblr media
Contrary to popular rumor, Lucie Arnaz was NOT in the final crowd scene, although Desi Jr. was. Yankee Doodle Dandy Day and the Minuteman Statue were based on actual Westport history. The very last half-hour episode, filmed April 4, 1957. 
“Lucy Takes A Cruise To Havana” (LDCH E1) ~ November 6, 1957
Tumblr media
The first hour-long episode of what became known in syndication as “The Lucy-Desi Comedy Hour,” continuing the adventures of the Ricardos and Mertzes.  This first episode was actually 75 minutes and told the story of the first meeting of Lucy and Ricky in 1940 Havana. Guest stars include Hedda Hopper, Ann Sothern (above), Rudy Vallee, and Cesar Romero. Filmed June 28, 1957. 
“The Celebrity Next Door” (LDCH E2) ~ December 3, 1957
Tumblr media
The title character was supposed to be Bette Davis, but she withdrew after a horse-riding accident and the role went to second choice Tallulah Bankhead. Lucille and Tallu did not get along. Sources say that Bankhead was drinking during the rehearsals which frustrated Ball. Richard Deacon and Elvia Allman are in the supporting cast. Filmed September 27, 1957.  
9 notes · View notes
feedbaylenny · 7 years
Text
No waiting until Christmas on Monday. Comcast, you obviously consider yourself too powerful.
Today, your hard-earned rate hikes take effect. Santa says you’ve been such a good company this year, only getting me concerned and wasting my time by forgetting when my Xfinity introductory offer ends.
Comcast notice, page 1 of 7
Comcast notice, page 2 of 7
Does anyone reading this have suggestions for me for when that offer actually does expire? I need the internet (keeping net neutrality, which nobody is counting on Comcast to do), and pretty much the local and basic cable stations, especially news. Nothing special. None of the new programs I’ve read about but never seen. There are a lot of companies’ names that I’ve read about but never understood. (See new information released today, below.)
Seems like I’ll be looking at something very different and unfamiliar, since my building doesn’t do Verizon’s Fios nor satellite.
Comcast’s old logo, before the feds let it buy NBC/Universal — under several conditions.
Comcast, I know costs go up but Philadelphia is your hometown, you have more to lose here than elsewhere and here, you actually own so much of your own programming and channels, including one for local sports fans (now called NBC Sports Philadelphia) and two broadcast, over the public’s airways.
One is WCAU-NBC10 (where I worked, 1998-2000, under General Electric, before the Universal and Comcast buyouts) and there’s WWSI-Telemundo62, the Spanish station really licensed to Atlantic City, whether or not it concentrates on people down the shore. In case you didn’t know, it comes just less than three years after NBC pulled its affiliation from New Jersey’s only major network affiliate, WMGM-40 in Atlantic City. That voice is gone.
SIDEBAR: Looking at NBC10’s website, I noticed the Channel 10 homepage weather featured “StormTracker4” and thought that was weird. NBC also owns its station in the next city up: WNBC-4 in New York. WNBC also brands its homepage weather “StormTracker4” but that makes sense, since it’s Channel 4!
So I tried another NBC-owned station that’s not on Channel 4 (anymore): WTVJ-6 in Miami. Their homepage weather is called “First Alert Doppler 6000” which makes sense for Channel 6 and is different from NBC’s two northern stations that are bigger, have different channel numbers, but the same name (at least at this moment). I wonder if this is regular or something simply went wrong.
Don’t forget synergy saves parent company Comcast money, and should be factored into our fees, too. (And kudos to Miami for actually selling their web weather preview!)
nbcphiladelphia.com (NBC)
nbcnewyork.com (NBC)
nbcmiami.com (NBC)
ANOTHER SIDEBAR: Newswise today, I noticed NBC10 beat Philadelphia competitor WTXF-Fox 29 (where I worked, 2016-2017) that had two headlines way up above the fold that were known and could’ve been written long ago — seven months and 15 months ago, respectively. Their personnel decisions should be going under the microscope.
fox29.com (21st Century Fox)
First, on May 9, 2017, it reported Philadelphia’s District Attorney’s Office decided not to charge Amtrak engineer Brandon Bostian “with a criminal offense” in the May 2015 crash that killed eight people and injured 200 others.
Then, three days later on May 12, 2017, it reported, “Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro expanded on charges a Philadelphia judge approved a day earlier after the family of a woman killed in the crash sought a private criminal complaint” and that specific story, more than seven months old, was for some reason updated today!
Your guess why a May 12 Associated Press article had to be updated Dec. 20 is as good as mine. I don��t know what’s new or corrected from May 12.
Second, a year and a half ago, in June 2016, I had trouble inserting my subway token at the Broad Street Subway’s Spring Garden station. There was no place to insert it. I ended up having to walk up and down steps at three of the four corners of that intersection to finally find a human to take my token and let me down to the train platform. So we knew tokens were being phased out. Besides, how many other cities already did away with them?
SIDEBAR OVER: So Comcast/Xfinity, for now, Merry Christmas, but I don’t know how long my even more costly business with you will last. We’ll have to find out if and when our relationship changes in the future. I can’t wait to see (with my own eyes) what you propose.
I also wonder, did @PHLCouncil, and especially my district’s @Darrell_Clarke, who happens to be city council president, allow your rate hike?
P.S. Readers probably figured out I had the Comcast portion of this blog post prepared since shortly after I got my bill (and read it) weeks ago. Coincidentally, I found several other articles on similar topics with updates and possible solutions, this morning alone!
First, The New York Times‘ “How to cut the cord on cable” which prepares us to use the internet and streaming services to save a ton of money. Our viewing habits are different, so we all should read it.
Second, according to The Seattle Times, a Washington State broadband company “filed a claim with the FCC saying cable giant Comcast is unfairly trying to force Wave to provide higher-priced sports TV channels to customers who don’t want them.”
Third, the fighting between station owners, and cable/satellite operators, for retransmission consent money that probably cost you from watching something you wanted at some point (with both sides blaming each other) continues.
According to TVAnswerMan, “AT&T’s U-verse TV service lost two more local stations last night due to a fee fight with their owner, Sarkes Tarzian, Inc.” Satellite provider Dish had been involved in the majority of recent fights. New England Patriots fans almost didn’t see the game against AFC-East rivals, the Miami Dolphins, until the Boston CBS station allowed carriage.
FTV Live‘s Scott Jones put it best:
“The TV station demands more money to carry their single, the cable company says no and the pissing match starts. The two take shots at each other and say that it’s all about you the viewer. Which is utter bullshit! Then after the nasty comments about each other, the two sides come to an agreement, in which they NEVER expose the details and life goes on. But, you know that more money the station is demanding means your monthly TV bill is going up.“
Finally, Bloomberg warns, “Cable TV’s password-sharing crackdown is coming” and “it’s a growing problem that could cost pay-TV companies millions of subscribers — and billions of dollars in revenue.”
The article reports TV Everywhere, started in 2009, “was an attempt to appeal to young consumers by letting them access cable or satellite shows on any device.” Of course, that “any device” part led to piracy and password-swapping since companies like Charter/Spectrum only force paying customers to enter their passwords for each device once a year. Somehow, tens of thousands watched just one subscriber’s streams simultaneously for free!
Anyway, after all that, got a solution for my Comcast concern? I’d love to hear in a comment! (Got a web link?) And thanks!
Today, Merry Christmas to Comcast! You’re welcome! No waiting until Christmas on Monday. Comcast, you obviously consider yourself too powerful. Today, your hard-earned rate hikes take effect.
0 notes
isaacscrawford · 7 years
Text
Creating Medicare Advantage Premium Support for All, Part 2: Benefit Design
With the legislative effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) stalled for now and the Trump administration moving to dismantle the law by all available regulatory means, the constructive among us are compelled to explore paths forward for our health care system that may be viable in the long run. Not coincidentally, before the quixotic rise and fall of the Graham-Cassidy bill, we saw a boomlet in the debate over a Medicare-for-all approach to universal coverage. So I would like to continue our inquiry into what the concept really means and try to answer the question: Is a bipartisan solution possible?
In my previous post, I introduced the concept of Medicare Advantage Premium Support for All (MAPSA). In brief, I posited that a national system that drives bona fide competition among private insurers (Medicare Advantage) and traditional Medicare by empowering consumers with advanceable tax credit subsidies could not only succeed in delivering universal, portable coverage, but that there is enough spending in our current system to finance it.
I was deeply encouraged by the robust positive and, equally helpful, critical feedback I received on this modest proposal. As I confessed at the outset, the thesis raises innumerable questions, with much more investigation and documentation necessary to prove the concept. With your help, I aim to explore these questions in future posts.
This post will take a closer look at the type of plan options we would have if we move to a Medicare-for-all system. In other words, it will explain the program’s current benefit design, how it varies in the Medicare Advantage program or with the purchase of supplemental coverage (Medigap), apparent gaps that may need to be addressed, and the strengths of the otherwise terminated coverage programs that should likely be maintained to optimize the MAPSA regime.
So let us continue this journey together, intrepid travelers, and define the system our country deserves.
Traditional Medicare And Part D
When Medicare began, it was comprised by two key components: an inpatient benefit (Part A) and an outpatient benefit (Part B), which loosely mirrors the Blue Cross Blue Shield model that evolved about a generation prior.
Generally, Medicare Part A has no premium; workers pay into the Medicare Trust Fund via a payroll tax and become eligible when they turn 65 or other criteria are met. In 2017, Part A had a $1,316 deductible for hospital stays, with additional costs kicking in after 60 and 91 days. Additional inpatient and related services are covered under this benefit, such as skilled nursing care and home health, each with their own coinsurance regime that I will not delve into here. Importantly, Medicare Part A has no limit on out-of-pocket costs—in other words, no catastrophic cap.
Medicare Part B covers clinician visits, clinical lab tests, outpatient hospital services, durable medical equipment, and more. In 2017, the deductible is $183 with 20 percent coinsurance for most services. Preventive screenings are covered for no additional cost. Like Part A, Part B currently has no limit on out-of-pocket costs. We’ll come back to that.
In 2003, Congress established a prescription drug benefit in Medicare, referred to as Part D. More akin to its neighbor, Part C (Medicare Advantage), Part D relies on private insurance carriers and pharmacy benefit managers to deliver a drug benefit within certain parameters. In 2017, the base benefit featured a $400 deductible, 25 percent coinsurance up to $3,700, a (now diminishing) coverage gap until the enrollee has spent $4,950 total out of pocket, and then 5 percent coinsurance after that. Plans may deviate from this model, but their approach must be actuarially equivalent to it.
With these three components taken together, Medicare covers almost all of the essential health benefits (EHBs) mandated under the ACA with an actuarial value of 84 percent (see Issue 9), which is approximately halfway between the gold and platinum tiers of coverage established by the ACA. There are some gaps between Medicare and EHBs that I will address later in this post.
Subsidy Programs
Low-income individuals enrolled in Medicare get support from Medicaid, including via the so-called Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs). Those who are fully eligible for Medicaid (so-called duals) have access essentially to any benefit their state plan covers that isn’t included in Medicare. This includes reducing their premium and cost-sharing responsibilities to what they would pay under Medicaid.
Beneficiaries who are not fully eligible for Medicaid but have income below 130 percent of the federal poverty level can also get assistance with their Part B premiums and, in some cases, cost sharing. Complexly, if endearingly, referred to as the QMB (quimby, [Qualified Medicare Beneficiary]), SLMB (slimby, [Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary]), and QI (Qualifying Individual) programs, the MSPs provide some degree of built-in means testing to the Medicare benefit that enhances the value for low-income enrollees.
Participation rates in these programs are remarkably low, however, with less than a third of eligible people enrolling in them. Furthermore, coordination between these state-based Medicaid programs and federal Medicare is challenging at best. In a MAPSA world, the Medicare subsidies embedded in Medicaid and the MSPs could be automatically included in the benefit delivered to those eligible, perhaps with a maintenance of effort provision applied to states to make it affordable. For more on that, you’ll have to wait for my financing post. It’s going to be a hoot.
For the prescription drug program, there is a low-income subsidy for individuals with incomes below 150 percent of the poverty level. Thirty percent of all Part D enrollees received the low-income subsidy in 2014; many are auto-enrolled. Most of these beneficiaries pay no premium and have no deductible, although those above 135 percent of poverty level may be required to make some out-of-pocket contribution. This chart helpfully puts eligibility requirements and benefits under the low-income subsidy program in one place.
Supplemental Coverage
For those who can afford it, there are supplemental insurance plans that traditional Medicare enrollees can buy to cut down their out-of-pocket spending. These Medigap plans are tightly regulated and are labeled A through L based on the degree of protections they offer. This chart provides a helpful overview of the plan offerings in 2012. Some Medigap plans include a catastrophic cap, although Congress recently moved to prohibit enrollment in the two most comprehensive plan options, under the theory that first-dollar coverage of health care services can increase overall program costs
Around 20 percent of Medicare beneficiaries buy Medigap plans. This is due in part to the fact that they are fairly expensive, averaging more than $2,000 per year in 2010 on top of the standard Medicare premium. While Medigap plans are subject to guaranteed issue requirements, they mimic commercial plans in being rated by age, sex, and smoking status in states that do not require community rating. They are also not available to individuals younger than age 65 in some states. With the ascent of Medicare Advantage, Medigap plans have been declining in popularity. Under MAPSA, Medigap could be the starting point for higher-income households to purchase enhanced coverage or for employers to provide these extra benefits to workers.
Medicare Advantage
Medicare Advantage, initially established as Medicare+Choice in 1997, is the commercial coverage component of Medicare in which private insurers offer competing benefit packages that meet federally mandated guidelines. One-third of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan in 2017, and they had, on average, 19 plans to choose from including health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and private fee-for-service options.
The “base benefit” for Medicare Advantage must include Part A and B benefits, and 88 percent of plans include the Part D drug benefit as well (so-called MA-PDs). Medicare Advantage enrollees pay the Part B premium, and there may be additional premiums if Part D or other optional benefits are included, although 81 percent of Medicare Advantage enrollees were offered “zero premium” MA-PD plans in 2017. Thirty-one percent had access to plans for less than the “base” Part B premium.
In 2017, on average, Medicare Advantage plans were paid on par with Medicare spending. Plan payment varies by region, although, in part due to statutorily set regional benchmarks. If the premiums they bid are below those benchmarks, plans can allocate some of the difference, a portion of which is otherwise rebated to them by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), toward additional benefits for their enrollees beyond what traditional Medicare covers.
For example, while, unlike traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans are required to cap out-of-pocket spending for medical benefits at $6,700, in 2017, the average out-of-pocket cap was a bit below that at $5,332. For beneficiaries enrolled in these plans that have no additional premium, they are basically getting this core benefit of Medigap for free.
Furthermore, the majority of Medicare Advantage plans include preventive dental care, eye care, and hearing assistance. In 2016, almost 40 percent of plans included nurse hotlines, 34 percent included gym memberships, and 25 percent included non-emergency transportation. A substantial majority of those plans were offered with zero additional premium. This recent Health Affairs blog post has a very helpful chart summarizing the array of extra benefits enrollees have access to.
The last thing to note about Medicare Advantage is that it features three special plan options targeted to the unique needs of certain populations. These Special Needs Plans cater to beneficiaries residing in institutional settings, those with chronic illnesses, and those dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Initially authorized on a temporary basis, Congress has recently advanced legislation to extend them permanently.
Gaps To Address: Catastrophic Coverage, Long-Term Services And Supports, And Kids
First of all, I want to avoid pretending we are going to resolve all of the Medicare program’s flaws in the same fell swoop that we expand it to cover everyone. I have no appetite to count the number of times, in its 50-plus years, Congress has amended the underlying law, and I truly shudder to fathom how many regulations CMS has issued implementing it. Suffice it to say, that work is going to continue, as it should, as new technologies evolve, innovative payment and delivery reforms are adopted, flaws come to light, and so forth.
The truth is, the Medicare program enjoys enviable popularity among its beneficiaries, greater than any other coverage program we have. So let’s not let the perfect be the enemy of the (very) good. At the same time, if we’re going to universalize it, it would be irresponsible not to acknowledge the program’s flaws with open eyes and adopt an intention to remedy them to the degree feasible.
This brief letter from leaders at the Center for Medicare Advocacy cuts right to the chase: The lack of vision, hearing, and dental coverage is an obvious gap in Medicare’s benefit design, as is the lack of a catastrophic cap in traditional Medicare or Part D.
Some of these challenges are remedied by the MSPs and low-income subsidy for lower-income beneficiaries and Medigap for those with more resources. Also, as noted, Medicare Advantage plans offer a cap on out-of-pocket spending and often cover some of these missing benefits. So you could argue that the broader Medicare “market” will solve these challenges for the vast majority of participants.
While adding these benefits to the standard Medicare package would clearly be preferable, if we are serious about this we have to be excruciatingly careful about cost. Just taking dental coverage, for example, in which a typical plan costs around $750 per year, adding that to Medicare just for its current enrollees would cost around $40 billion per year.
With regard to including catastrophic coverage in traditional Medicare, I refer you to this postmortem of the enactment and rapidly ensuing repeal of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act in the late 1980s, published by Health Affairs in 1990. Including a catastrophic cap is still actively debated, although often in conjunction with making the convoluted cost-sharing structure of Medicare Part A more uniform and aligned with that of Part B.
There are at least two gaps in Medicare coverage that are especially important to consider in the context of a MAPSA regime where we purport to phase out other major coverage options currently offered, especially Medicaid and commercial insurance. They are long-term services and supports (LTSS) and early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment (EPSDT) services. For more on how Medicaid and Medicare benefits differ, I refer you to this helpful side by side.
(Side note: because the Department of Veterans Affairs, Tricare, and Indian Health Service together only cover approximately 5 percent of the population, I intend to set aside disposition of them for purposes of this inquiry. Suffice it to say that it’s this guy’s opinion that, wherever our health system goes, the care and coverage value delivered to these populations should be maintained or enhanced.)
With limited coverage under Medicare and very few, if any, viable commercial options, Medicaid has become the de facto source of long-term care for our country, especially for those with lower income. This includes not just institutional (primarily nursing home) care but home and community-based services as well. LTSS provide assistance to individuals who have trouble completing routine tasks due to age, chronic illness, or disability.
LTSS are expensive, with nursing home care costing on average $91,250 per year, although home and community-based options are considerably less expensive. Total national spending on these services was $310 billion in 2013. Excluding certain administrative costs, and so forth, Medicaid spent $123 billion on LTSS that year, which accounted for about 28 percent of total program spending.
Under MAPSA, these costs could continue to be borne by an ongoing partnership between states and the federal government, a vestige of the otherwise repealed Medicaid program. Alternatively, a new benefit could be added to Medicare to cover these costs, which may be preferable although, again, the price tag could prove prohibitive.
Last, but certainly not least, we have to take care of our kids. Medicare has been honed around the needs of senior citizens and the disabled. The vast majority of the benefits translate perfectly well to the pediatric population, although. While there are some other nuances to consider, I suggest that EPSDT, vision and dental, and neonatal care are the benefits currently covered by Medicaid or under the ACA that must be added to Medicare to ensure no child is worse off under the new system.
In Medicaid, EPSDT provides a wide range of preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services in a more robust way than the program affords adults. It ensures any treatment or service deemed necessary is paid for so long as it falls under one of the very broad categories of Medicaid coverage. Caps on the benefit are not allowed. Despite its comprehensiveness, the cost of EPSDT is relatively low.
Furthermore, the ACA mandates coverage of vision and dental health services for kids, as well as neonatal care. Pediatric dental plans may be sold separately in the exchanges, and that could be a model adopted under MAPSA, although a pediatric vision benefit is mandated for all plans. Medicaid also requires coverage of vision and dental care for kids. Again, in a pediatric context, covering these services and neonatal care is not likely to tip the scale meaningfully when it comes to spending.
On a related note, Medicare also does not cover contraceptive services, which are a mandatory benefit under the ACA and Medicaid. The Trump administration’s recent move to expand exceptions to this requirement for employers is only the most recent demonstration of the political volatility of the topic. It’s not an overstatement to say that it, not to mention disposition of existing Hyde Amendment restrictions on federal funding of abortion, could undermine an otherwise bipartisan agreement on broad-based reform. For now, I will simply point out that evidence strongly supports the conclusion that access to contraception reduces unwanted pregnancies and health care spending. The rest we’ll put off to another day.
Conclusion And Next Steps
I would suggest that the key takeaway here is that the Medicare benefit is pretty darn robust, an excellent place to start for a universal coverage regime. With some minor exceptions, it covers everything we would need, has built-in assistance for low-income people, and provides pathways for employers or higher-income households to buy additional benefits. With Medicare Advantage, it would provide additional choices for families to pick a plan that’s best for them, while fostering competition among private carriers on premium, quality, and other factors consumers care about.
As noted, there are some clear flaws that would need to be confronted, especially the lack of a catastrophic cap in the traditional program and exclusion of LTSS or EPSDT coverage. With this in mind, in a subsequent post, I will try to sort out what the existing spending in our system (federal, state, employer, and household) could afford if repurposed toward an advanceable tax credit for the purchase of a Medicare plan.
Additional must-do’s on the list include considering the impact on providers, transitional issues for families, employers, and states as we consolidate our multisiloed regime, and (perhaps most importantly) political viability.
What am I missing? Please keep your feedback and new ideas coming and stick with me. This is going to take a while, but, let’s be honest, we’ve got plenty of time.
Article source:Health Affairs
0 notes
nancydhooper · 7 years
Text
Forget Prince; Minnesota Opens Courts to Hulk Hogans of the World with Revenge Porn Civil Action
Recently, I attended the University of Minnesota’s celebration of “40 Years of Gopher Justice,” an event honoring the institution’s University Student Legal Service (“USLS”), a non-profit organization that provides UMN students with free legal services. The celebration included a panel on a contemporary topic in student advocacy: “revenge porn.” The topic isn’t relevant just for students, though. One may recall that just last year Hulk Hogan successfully sued the now-defunct gossip news site Gawker for its dissemination of a sex tape depicting him and another woman. Hulk Hogan eventually settled the case with Gawker for $31M.
Hulk Hogan testifies in his suit against Gawker. Image credit: Slate.
The USLS celebration panel hosted three experts on revenge porn, including two attorneys knowledgeable about Minnesota’s new suite of civil and criminal remedies that went into effect in late-summer 2016. See Minn. Stat. §§ 604.31 (civil), 617.261 (criminal). In response to my question about the civil action, one of the attorneys remarked that he believed the Minnesota law created a “copyright” to one’s image, enabling that person to prevent unwanted dissemination and exploitation of pictures and recordings depicting the person in a sexual way. For the sake of persons hoping to prevent and recover damages for unwanted dissemination under Minnesota’s new law, I hope he’s incorrect; after all, the Copyright Act preempts all state laws that overlap with federal protections over the subject matter of copyright, see 17 U.S.C. § 301(a)—which includes photographs and videos, see 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)(5)-(6).
In order to bring a civil action for non-consensual dissemination of private images (the “revenge porn civil action”) in Minnesota, (1) the defendant must have disseminated a private image without the plaintiff’s consent, (2) the image must have been of a sexual character, (3) the plaintiff must have been identifiable in the image, and (4) the image must have been obtained or created under circumstances in which the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy. See § 604.31, subd. 1. If these four elements are shown, the plaintiff may recover general and special damages, including financial losses resulting from the dissemination of an image and damages for mental anguish, disgorgement of profits made from dissemination, civil penalties, and attorneys’ fees. See § 604.31, subd. 3. See the Minnesota Senate’s overview of this law for more general information about the revenge porn civil action.
What’s interesting about this cause of action is that it’s a blend of both (1) the right to privacy and (2) an intellectual property right called the right of publicity. Right to privacy claims (for invasion of privacy) typically remedy the unjustified exploitation of one’s personality and injury to privacy interests that are emotive or reputational. Right of publicity claims, on the other hand, combat the unauthorized use of one’s identity in commercial advertising and compensate persons for the value of the commercial use of that identity and/or reductions in the value of the cultivated identity. Minnesota’s revenge porn civil action appears to be a specific hybrid of both kinds of claims; it protects both privacy and property interests in a person’s identity and provides relief in the form of both reputational and economic damages, as well as injunctive relief.
Coincidentally, when Minnesota passed its revenge porn bill in 2016, it was also considering the codification of the right of publicity under a bill entitled the “Personal Rights In Names Can Endure” (“PRINCE”) Act. But the bill’s sponsor later pulled his draft after critics expressed concerns about the bill’s broad language. One commentator questioned whether such a bill was necessary in light of Hulk Hogan’s victory. Minnesota’s revenge porn civil action arguably combined two separate claims into one, but it also expanded the scope of recovery under either claim so as to now include multiple forms of relief.
Whether the revenge porn civil action will be utilized to any significant degree is as of yet uncertain. The USLS celebration panelists noted—and a brief case search confirms—that courts have yet to extensively apply and interpret the law. From the face of the law, though, it appears that Minnesota is now a hospitable forum for victims of revenge porn, especially celebrities with economically-valuable identities. And due to the state’s broad remedial scheme, I would not be surprised if we eventually see large cases like Hulk Hogan’s in Minnesota courts.
The post Forget Prince; Minnesota Opens Courts to Hulk Hogans of the World with Revenge Porn Civil Action appeared first on DuetsBlog.
from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8247012 http://www.duetsblog.com/2017/10/articles/copyrights/forget-prince-minnesota-opens-courts-to-hulk-hogans-of-the-world-with-revenge-porn-civil-action/ via http://www.rssmix.com/
0 notes
kennethmullins · 7 years
Text
Forget Prince; Minnesota Opens Courts to Hulk Hogans of the World with Revenge Porn Civil Action
Recently, I attended the University of Minnesota’s celebration of “40 Years of Gopher Justice,” an event honoring the institution’s University Student Legal Service (“USLS”), a non-profit organization that provides UMN students with free legal services. The celebration included a panel on a contemporary topic in student advocacy: “revenge porn.” The topic isn’t relevant just for students, though. One may recall that just last year Hulk Hogan successfully sued the now-defunct gossip news site Gawker for its dissemination of a sex tape depicting him and another woman. Hulk Hogan eventually settled the case with Gawker for $31M.
Hulk Hogan testifies in his suit against Gawker. Image credit: Slate.
The USLS celebration panel hosted three experts on revenge porn, including two attorneys knowledgeable about Minnesota’s new suite of civil and criminal remedies that went into effect in late-summer 2016. See Minn. Stat. §§ 604.31 (civil), 617.261 (criminal). In response to my question about the civil action, one of the attorneys remarked that he believed the Minnesota law created a “copyright” to one’s image, enabling that person to prevent unwanted dissemination and exploitation of pictures and recordings depicting the person in a sexual way. For the sake of persons hoping to prevent and recover damages for unwanted dissemination under Minnesota’s new law, I hope he’s incorrect; after all, the Copyright Act preempts all state laws that overlap with federal protections over the subject matter of copyright, see 17 U.S.C. § 301(a)—which includes photographs and videos, see 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)(5)-(6).
In order to bring a civil action for non-consensual dissemination of private images (the “revenge porn civil action”) in Minnesota, (1) the defendant must have disseminated a private image without the plaintiff’s consent, (2) the image must have been of a sexual character, (3) the plaintiff must have been identifiable in the image, and (4) the image must have been obtained or created under circumstances in which the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy. See § 604.31, subd. 1. If these four elements are shown, the plaintiff may recover general and special damages, including financial losses resulting from the dissemination of an image and damages for mental anguish, disgorgement of profits made from dissemination, civil penalties, and attorneys’ fees. See § 604.31, subd. 3. See the Minnesota Senate’s overview of this law for more general information about the revenge porn civil action.
What’s interesting about this cause of action is that it’s a blend of both (1) the right to privacy and (2) an intellectual property right called the right of publicity. Right to privacy claims (for invasion of privacy) typically remedy the unjustified exploitation of one’s personality and injury to privacy interests that are emotive or reputational. Right of publicity claims, on the other hand, combat the unauthorized use of one’s identity in commercial advertising and compensate persons for the value of the commercial use of that identity and/or reductions in the value of the cultivated identity. Minnesota’s revenge porn civil action appears to be a specific hybrid of both kinds of claims; it protects both privacy and property interests in a person’s identity and provides relief in the form of both reputational and economic damages, as well as injunctive relief.
Coincidentally, when Minnesota passed its revenge porn bill in 2016, it was also considering the codification of the right of publicity under a bill entitled the “Personal Rights In Names Can Endure” (“PRINCE”) Act. But the bill’s sponsor later pulled his draft after critics expressed concerns about the bill’s broad language. One commentator questioned whether such a bill was necessary in light of Hulk Hogan’s victory. Minnesota’s revenge porn civil action arguably combined two separate claims into one, but it also expanded the scope of recovery under either claim so as to now include multiple forms of relief.
Whether the revenge porn civil action will be utilized to any significant degree is as of yet uncertain. The USLS celebration panelists noted—and a brief case search confirms—that courts have yet to extensively apply and interpret the law. From the face of the law, though, it appears that Minnesota is now a hospitable forum for victims of revenge porn, especially celebrities with economically-valuable identities. And due to the state’s broad remedial scheme, I would not be surprised if we eventually see large cases like Hulk Hogan’s in Minnesota courts.
The post Forget Prince; Minnesota Opens Courts to Hulk Hogans of the World with Revenge Porn Civil Action appeared first on DuetsBlog.
0 notes
jimgsimon · 7 years
Text
Forget Prince; Minnesota Opens Courts to Hulk Hogans of the World with Revenge Porn Civil Action
Recently, I attended the University of Minnesota’s celebration of “40 Years of Gopher Justice,” an event honoring the institution’s University Student Legal Service (“USLS”), a non-profit organization that provides UMN students with free legal services. The celebration included a panel on a contemporary topic in student advocacy: “revenge porn.” The topic isn’t relevant just for students, though. One may recall that just last year Hulk Hogan successfully sued the now-defunct gossip news site Gawker for its dissemination of a sex tape depicting him and another woman. Hulk Hogan eventually settled the case with Gawker for $31M.
Hulk Hogan testifies in his suit against Gawker. Image credit: Slate.
The USLS celebration panel hosted three experts on revenge porn, including two attorneys knowledgeable about Minnesota’s new suite of civil and criminal remedies that went into effect in late-summer 2016. See Minn. Stat. §§ 604.31 (civil), 617.261 (criminal). In response to my question about the civil action, one of the attorneys remarked that he believed the Minnesota law created a “copyright” to one’s image, enabling that person to prevent unwanted dissemination and exploitation of pictures and recordings depicting the person in a sexual way. For the sake of persons hoping to prevent and recover damages for unwanted dissemination under Minnesota’s new law, I hope he’s incorrect; after all, the Copyright Act preempts all state laws that overlap with federal protections over the subject matter of copyright, see 17 U.S.C. § 301(a)—which includes photographs and videos, see 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)(5)-(6).
In order to bring a civil action for non-consensual dissemination of private images (the “revenge porn civil action”) in Minnesota, (1) the defendant must have disseminated a private image without the plaintiff’s consent, (2) the image must have been of a sexual character, (3) the plaintiff must have been identifiable in the image, and (4) the image must have been obtained or created under circumstances in which the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy. See § 604.31, subd. 1. If these four elements are shown, the plaintiff may recover general and special damages, including financial losses resulting from the dissemination of an image and damages for mental anguish, disgorgement of profits made from dissemination, civil penalties, and attorneys’ fees. See § 604.31, subd. 3. See the Minnesota Senate’s overview of this law for more general information about the revenge porn civil action.
What’s interesting about this cause of action is that it’s a blend of both (1) the right to privacy and (2) an intellectual property right called the right of publicity. Right to privacy claims (for invasion of privacy) typically remedy the unjustified exploitation of one’s personality and injury to privacy interests that are emotive or reputational. Right of publicity claims, on the other hand, combat the unauthorized use of one’s identity in commercial advertising and compensate persons for the value of the commercial use of that identity and/or reductions in the value of the cultivated identity. Minnesota’s revenge porn civil action appears to be a specific hybrid of both kinds of claims; it protects both privacy and property interests in a person’s identity and provides relief in the form of both reputational and economic damages, as well as injunctive relief.
Coincidentally, when Minnesota passed its revenge porn bill in 2016, it was also considering the codification of the right of publicity under a bill entitled the “Personal Rights In Names Can Endure” (“PRINCE”) Act. But the bill’s sponsor later pulled his draft after critics expressed concerns about the bill’s broad language. One commentator questioned whether such a bill was necessary in light of Hulk Hogan’s victory. Minnesota’s revenge porn civil action arguably combined two separate claims into one, but it also expanded the scope of recovery under either claim so as to now include multiple forms of relief.
Whether the revenge porn civil action will be utilized to any significant degree is as of yet uncertain. The USLS celebration panelists noted—and a brief case search confirms—that courts have yet to extensively apply and interpret the law. From the face of the law, though, it appears that Minnesota is now a hospitable forum for victims of revenge porn, especially celebrities with economically-valuable identities. And due to the state’s broad remedial scheme, I would not be surprised if we eventually see large cases like Hulk Hogan’s in Minnesota courts.
The post Forget Prince; Minnesota Opens Courts to Hulk Hogans of the World with Revenge Porn Civil Action appeared first on DuetsBlog.
0 notes