#defence ai blog writer

[ai-blog-writer-defence]

Empower Your Defence Blogging Journey with AI

In the dynamic landscape of defense and security, effective communication through blogging is essential for informing the public, shaping policy discourse, and sharing expert insights. However, the traditional approach to the defense AI Blog Writer often comes with challenges such as time constraints, resource limitations, and the need for specialized knowledge. Enter AI-powered blogging tools, poised to revolutionize the defense blogging journey by empowering users with advanced capabilities and efficiency. AI offers a transformative solution to streamline and enhance the defense blogging process. By leveraging natural language processing and machine learning algorithms, AI-powered tools can analyze vast amounts of data, generate high-quality content, and assist users in various aspects of blogging, from content creation to optimization and dissemination.

One of the key advantages of AI in defense blogging is its ability to automate and expedite the content creation process. Traditional methods of researching, drafting, and editing blog posts can be time-consuming and labor-intensive. With AI, users can input a topic or set of keywords, and the system can generate well-structured, coherent articles within minutes. This enables defense bloggers to produce a steady stream of timely and relevant content, keeping their audience engaged and informed. Moreover, AI-powered tools can help users discover new insights and perspectives by analyzing vast datasets. By scanning through news articles, scholarly papers, policy documents, and social media posts, AI can identify trends, correlations, and emerging issues in the defense sphere. This allows defense bloggers to stay ahead of the curve, providing fresh and valuable insights to their audience.

Another significant benefit of AI in defense blogging is its ability to optimize content for search engines and social media platforms. AI can analyze audience preferences, identify relevant keywords and topics, and suggest strategies for improving visibility and engagement. By leveraging AI-driven insights, defense bloggers can enhance the reach and impact of their content, attracting a larger audience and fostering greater influence in the defense community. Furthermore, AI-powered tools can assist users in maintaining consistency and quality across their blogging efforts. By analyzing existing content and identifying patterns in writing style, tone, and structure, AI can ensure coherence and professionalism in blog posts. This helps to build brand identity and credibility over time, establishing the blogger as a trusted source of information and analysis in the defense field.

Despite the numerous advantages of AI in defense blogging, it's essential to recognize its limitations and potential challenges. AI-driven content generation may lack the human touch and nuanced analysis that comes with human expertise. Users must therefore exercise critical judgment and supplement AI-generated content with their own insights and perspectives to ensure accuracy and relevance. In conclusion, AI has the potential to empower defense bloggers by streamlining the content creation process, uncovering new insights, optimizing content for visibility and engagement, and maintaining consistency and quality across blogging efforts. By leveraging AI-powered tools, defense bloggers can enhance their productivity, influence, and impact in the defense community, contributing to a more informed and vibrant public discourse on defense and security issues.

[srbachchan]

DAY 5614

Jalsa, Mumbai                     July 1/2,  2023                  Sat/Sun 11:57 PM

🪔 .. July 02 .. birthday greetings to .. Ef Ef Madhuri Dharanipragada .. Ef Sanjay Patodiya from Kolkata .. Ef Jayesh Brahmbhatt from Gujarat ..

And .. dear Avni Rathi , the CONQUEROR from Solapur .. your birthday was on May 22 , and we regret missing it , because we didn't know , but now we know .. you have our wishes and affection always and of all the Ef Family .. keep conquering 💪🏽 .. love ❤️ ..

..

And .. wishes for the Amar Akbar Anthony Film screening tomorrow Sunday 2nd July at BFI ( the British Film Institute .. UK’s lead organization for Film ) under the brand ICONIC ..

never ever thought that this film would be seeing a day like this .. but the genius of Manmohan Desai had other ideas .. his first Production under his banner .. and what a complete joy to be a part of it .. 

Much has changed since then .. but this lives on .. as do most others ..

And the debates on AI continue .. many have reacted to the informal mention on this page and have commented on its veracity and its drawbacks .. society, morals, defence, secret services .. the list is endless .. and we move on ..

Anxious now how the morning papers shall portray this bit of the Blog .. 😁 

Autobiography .. !!! 

Many do insist that it must come from me .. and it amuses me .. I have nothing autobiographical about me .. Babuji did , and his, in 4 volumes, became iconic and ably rewarded .. the best reaction coming from the pundits of literature and the literary world that ..

“ your prose is better than your poetry” !!

Then on set I came across a book being used as a prop that volumed various quotes on various topics .. and on ‘autobiography’ this came up :

‘An autobiography is an obituary in serial form with the last instalment missing.’ ~ Quentin Crisp 1908 - 99 The Naked Civil Servant ( 1968 )

for some strange reason the book on set .. had its title covered with paper that read  Bonsai Plants .. 

Bonsai represents miniature .. I guess minimalistic for a book on quotes was an apt thought .. he haha ..😂

There were many more .. but I refrain .. that strain, brings pain .. for the ability of the copywriter to make it in sensationalist headlines would be compromised ! 😳

Ahh heh .. I be too naughty in my write .. disruptuous , mutinous , recalcitrant  .. but then the liberty of express , plays uniformly , does it not  .. especially for the 1.4 + billion .. ypj’s

be in good stead dear readers and writers .. the path to the glory hath been disrupted by the diversionary lanes to the ultimate destination ..

So was I able to make this readable in compete with the morrow HL  ..

Love and regard as always ..

Amitabh Bachchan

[whittlebaggett8]

 The Cold Reality of Tiananmen at 30

The entire world may perhaps treatment about the anniversary on June 4, but the Chinese public has moved on.

By Christopher K. Colley for The Diplomat

May 22, 2019

This yr marks a number of essential anniversaries in China: The May possibly 4 Movement of 1919, the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949, and the upcoming 30th anniversary of the June 4, 1989 crackdown on the Tiananmen Square demonstrations (typically abbreviated as 6/4). Importantly, these of us in the West need to realize the inconvenient truth of the matter that our values centered on democratic norms are clashing with the empirical truth of modern day China. Though 6/4 may possibly still resonate with journalists and China watchers, the large the vast majority of the Chinese public has moved on.

The worldwide media’s coverage of the anniversary tends to target on restricted Chinese security bordering the anniversary. In addition, relevant articles or blog posts on human rights in China usually element Chinese dissidents such as Ai Weiwei, the late Liu Xiaobo, and Hu Jia, who are regularly cited as proof of a modern society that is pushing again from an authoritarian Chinese condition. In accordance to this viewpoint, the surveillance condition is capable to protect against any collective action that could possibly resurrect the collective memory of 6/4, therefore causing China to endure some sort of meaningful political alter.

Though the media deserves credit history for bringing to gentle China’s egregious violations of human rights (routinely in open violation of Chinese regulations), most Chinese are not willing to consider element in collective action unless their interests are directly threatened. Importantly, the West desires to ask regardless of whether large coverage and commentary centered on dissidents and sensitive anniversaries coveys the modern political and social reality of the the vast majority of Chinese.

Enjoying this posting? Click on below to subscribe for total entry. Just $5 a month.

By focusing on fringe dissidents, this dialogue on China’s rise pitfalls missing the forest for the trees. By cherry choosing unique Chinese dissidents who espouse Western democratic norms, we are neglecting the fact that most Chinese essentially help the Chinese Communist Bash (CCP). In accordance Boston University’s Joseph Fewsmith, more than 85 percent of Chinese are “relatively, or really happy with the central authorities.” This inconvenient reality requirements to be acknowledged in upcoming discussions of China’s increase. The real story of 6/4 anniversaries right now is not that of the commendable and courageous Tiananmen Moms, but the fact that instances in China have by no means been better, therefore giving a weak incentive for Chinese to resurrect the ghosts of 6/4. Whether or not the West likes it or not, the CCP has delivered to the Chinese persons in a way that most would have imagined difficult on June 5, 1989.

According to the United Nations Human Growth Stories, which evaluate a long time of education, lifetime expectancy, and revenue, China’s human improvement index has skyrocketed from .50 in 1990 to .75 in 2017 (the last year data is accessible). (The American rating went from .86 to .92 in excess of the exact period of time.) As the chart below demonstrates, when in contrast to other building (and democratic) countries these types of as India and South Africa (democratic considering the fact that 1994) China has performed terribly nicely.

The CCP has remodeled a typically rural region into an financial powerhouse with a middle course that according to McKinsey & Firm will contain 550 million individuals by 2022. These symbolize city homes that earn between $9,000 and $34,000 for every 12 months. A easy problem demands to be asked in the run-up to the 30th anniversary of 6/4: what would lead to these persons to rebel? What would bring about them to rekindle the memory of 6/4 and risk all that China has attained over the earlier 40 yrs?

To argue that the surveillance condition prevents collective action and significant protests may possibly be legitimate in numerous elements of China, but these protests do not get in touch with for the overthrow of the CCP, but rather are mainly concentrated on local grievances these kinds of as the illegal confiscation of land and environmental degradation. To say that the Chinese are brainwashed by nationalist propaganda also misses the place. Chinese could be greatly motivated by the state, but this propaganda functions in conjunction with the empirical actuality of massive increases in content gains, which virtually just about every Chinese (city and rural) has immediately benefited from. George Washington University Professor Bruce Dickson has discovered that Chinese care fewer about over-all GDP, which can be intensely allotted to elites, but much more about the income that ends up in their individual pockets. Importantly, his exploration also reveals that 77 p.c of Chinese surveyed possibly strongly agree or concur that “demonstrations can very easily switch into social upheaval, threatening social balance.”

Although a couple of younger and brave Chinese learners motivated by Mao and Marx could be advocating for migrant employees, they are not at all consultant of Chinese learners. A 22-12 months-outdated Chinese faculty student born in 1997 has recognised very little but economic development for her overall lifestyle. Importantly, her mother and father know what it signifies to endure hardship and will probable have instructed her about the complications they encountered when they were being youthful – for instance, it was only in 1993 that ration tickets for products and solutions like meat and eggs ended up phased out. This same student can find out from her grandparents about the horrors of the Mao era, where tens of millions of Chinese died in the wonderful famine of the Terrific Leap Forward and the political and social chaos of the Cultural Revolution. In point, around the past 30 many years China has knowledgeable a period of stability that former generations ended up denied for almost 200 yrs.

We need to talk to ourselves whether we are seeing what we want to see when concentrating on Chinese dissidents. Anecdotally, I lectured for six years on international relations at many top Beijing universities. I was usually surprised that just about none of my learners experienced ever read of the numerous dissidents described over, even though they occupied headlines in the New York Moments and other Western media shops. Although component of this may possibly mainly because of Chinese censorship, a improved clarification is that these learners weren’t all that interested in the dissidents’ stories. They actually needed to sign up for the CCP and ended up immediate beneficiaries of China’s “economic miracle,” consequently they experienced a vested social and economic interest in not rocking the boat.

Are these dissidents the true story of fashionable Chinese civil culture? Whilst they could be combating for a a lot more equal and regulation-centered China, do we see what we want to see in them and consciously overlook the greater photograph? Is it feasible that most Chinese, whilst irritated by corruption and other sorts of federal government malfeasance, continue to have religion in the framework of CCP rule and subscribe to the Orwellian verse of “no Chinese Communist Social gathering, no New China?”

On a brighter take note, individuals who say “Western-style” democracy unsuccessful to function in China want to consider a phase back and let the tale of China’s rise to carry on. The theory that as a nation grows wealthier its citizens will push for democratic reforms is not dead in China. In actuality, China is way too unequal and the center course much too tiny as a proportion of the total inhabitants for this kind of a phenomenon to come about anytime in the in the vicinity of foreseeable future. In addition, many users of this emerging course are utilized by the government, so supplying them a powerful interest in protecting the position quo.

In the long run, journalists, policymakers, and civil culture advocates require to recognize that the large vast majority of Chinese have small curiosity in marking 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen demonstrations. The West needs to fully grasp the social and financial realities at perform in China that make this anniversary a nonevent for most Chinese. We also will need to issue how prevalent is the help for properly-indicating dissidents in Chinese culture at massive. Though quite a few Chinese harbor very similar grievances, they are not acute more than enough to bring about them to take section in collective motion towards the govt. By positioning too much emphasis on these actors and anniversaries, we might be misinterpreting and exaggerating the significance of what are now perceived by the masses to be fairly insignificant political situations and people. Much more importantly, we hazard missing the wider motion in Chinese civil modern society, which supports the CCP – at the very least as very long as improves in residing specifications carry on.

Dr. Christopher K. Colley is Assistant Professor of Safety Experiments at the National Protection School of the United Arab Emirates. He retains a Master’s diploma in Chinese research from Renmin College of China and a Ph.D. in political science from Indiana University Bloomington. The viewpoints expressed in this post are those of the writer and do not replicate the views of the National Defense University, or the United Arab Emirates government.

The post  The Cold Reality of Tiananmen at 30 appeared first on Defence Online.

from WordPress https://defenceonline.com/2019/05/22/the-cold-reality-of-tiananmen-at-30/

[mikemortgage]

Face recognition researcher fights Amazon over biased AI

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Facial recognition technology was already seeping into everyday life — from your photos on Facebook to police scans of mugshots — when Joy Buolamwini noticed a serious glitch: Some of the software couldn’t detect dark-skinned faces like hers.

That revelation sparked the Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher to launch a project that’s having an outsize influence on the debate over how artificial intelligence should be deployed in the real world.

Her tests on software created by brand-name tech firms such as Amazon uncovered much higher error rates in classifying the gender of darker-skinned women than for lighter-skinned men.

Along the way, Buolamwini has spurred Microsoft and IBM to improve their systems and irked Amazon, which publicly attacked her research methods. On Wednesday, a group of AI scholars, including a winner of computer science’s top prize, launched a spirited defence of her work and called on Amazon to stop selling its facial recognition software to police.

Her work has also caught the attention of political leaders in statehouses and Congress and led some to seek limits on the use of computer vision tools to analyze human faces.

“There needs to be a choice,” said Buolamwini, a graduate student and researcher at MIT’s Media Lab. “Right now, what’s happening is these technologies are being deployed widely without oversight, oftentimes covertly, so that by the time we wake up, it’s almost too late.”

Buolamwini is hardly alone in expressing caution about the fast-moving adoption of facial recognition by police, government agencies and businesses from stores to apartment complexes. Many other researchers have shown how AI systems, which look for patterns in huge troves of data, will mimic the institutional biases embedded in the data they are learning from. For instance, if AI systems are developed using images of mostly white men, the systems will work best in recognizing white men.

Those disparities can sometimes be a matter of life or death: One recent study of the computer vision systems that enable self-driving cars to “see” the road shows they have a harder time detecting pedestrians with darker skin tones.

What’s struck a chord about Boulamwini’s work is her method of testing the systems created by well-known companies. She applies such systems to a skin-tone scale used by dermatologists, then names and shames those that show racial and gender bias. Buolamwini, who’s also founded a coalition of scholars, activists and others called the Algorithmic Justice League, has blended her scholarly investigations with activism.

“It adds to a growing body of evidence that facial recognition affects different groups differently,” said Shankar Narayan, of the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington state, where the group has sought restrictions on the technology. “Joy’s work has been part of building that awareness.”

Amazon, whose CEO, Jeff Bezos, she emailed directly last summer, has responded by aggressively taking aim at her research methods.

A Buolamwini-led study published just over a year ago found disparities in how facial-analysis systems built by IBM, Microsoft and the Chinese company Face Plus Plus classified people by gender. Darker-skinned women were the most misclassified group, with error rates of up to 34.7%. By contrast, the maximum error rate for lighter-skinned males was less than 1%.

The study called for “urgent attention” to address the bias.

“I responded pretty much right away,” said Ruchir Puri, chief scientist of IBM Research, describing an email he received from Buolamwini last year.

Since then, he said, “it’s been a very fruitful relationship” that informed IBM’s unveiling this year of a new 1 million-image database for better analyzing the diversity of human faces. Previous systems have been overly reliant on what Buolamwini calls “pale male” image repositories.

Microsoft, which had the lowest error rates, declined comment. Messages left with Face Plus Plus weren’t immediately returned.

Months after her first study, when Buolamwini worked with University of Toronto researcher Inioluwa Deborah Raji on a follow-up test, all three companies showed major improvements.

But this time they also added Amazon, which has sold the system it calls Rekognition to law enforcement agencies. The results, published in late January, showed Amazon badly misidentifying darker-hued women.

“We were surprised to see that Amazon was where their competitors were a year ago,” Buolamwini said.

Amazon dismissed what it called Buolamwini’s “erroneous claims” and said the study confused facial analysis with facial recognition, improperly measuring the former with techniques for evaluating the latter.

“The answer to anxieties over new technology is not to run ‘tests’ inconsistent with how the service is designed to be used, and to amplify the test’s false and misleading conclusions through the news media,” Matt Wood, general manager of artificial intelligence for Amazon’s cloud-computing division, wrote in a January blog post. Amazon declined requests for an interview.

“I didn’t know their reaction would be quite so hostile,” Buolamwini said recently in an interview at her MIT lab.

Coming to her defence Wednesday was a coalition of researchers, including AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio , recent winner of the Turing Award, considered the tech field’s version of the Nobel Prize.

They criticized Amazon’s response, especially its distinction between facial recognition and analysis.

“In contrast to Dr. Wood’s claims, bias found in one system is cause for concern in the other, particularly in use cases that could severely impact people’s lives, such as law enforcement applications,” they wrote.

Its few publicly known clients have defended Amazon’s system.

Chris Adzima, senior information systems analyst for the Washington County Sheriff’s Office in Oregon, said the agency uses Amazon’s Rekognition to identify the most likely matches among its collection of roughly 350,000 mug shots. But because a human makes the final decision, “the bias of that computer system is not transferred over into any results or any action taken,” Adzima said.

But increasingly, regulators and legislators are having their doubts. A bipartisan bill in Congress seeks limits on facial recognition. Legislatures in Washington and Massachusetts are considering laws of their own.

Buolamwini said a major message of her research is that AI systems need to be carefully reviewed and consistently monitored if they’re going to be used on the public. Not just to audit for accuracy, she said, but to ensure face recognition isn’t abused to violate privacy or cause other harms.

“We can’t just leave it to companies alone to do these kinds of checks,” she said.

——

Associated Press writer Gillian Flaccus contributed to this report from Hillsboro, Oregon.

from Financial Post https://ift.tt/2HVgTKP via IFTTT Blogger Mortgage Tumblr Mortgage Evernote Mortgage Wordpress Mortgage href="https://www.diigo.com/user/gelsi11">Diigo Mortgage

[giuseppenoc]

Bilderberg 2018 Turín - Italia

Un Nuevo artículo ha sido publicado en https://web2meet.net/bilderberg-2018-turin-italia/

Bilderberg 2018 Turín - Italia

El Club Bilderberg 2018

Realizará su reunión anual entre el 7 y el 10 de junio en Turín, Italia. Entre los participantes de este año se encuentran: el ex secretario de Estado de los EEUU, Henry Kissinger; el rey Guillermo de Holanda; el Secretario General de la OTAN, Jens Stoltenberg; miembros de juntas directivas de Google y Facebook; presidentes de corporaciones petroleras (Shell, British Petroleum, Total); primeros ministros; presidentes de bancos internacionales (Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Santander, Lazard, KBC); el presidente del Foro Económico Mundial de Davos; ex-directores de la CIA y del servicio de inteligencia MI6 británico; el director de la UNESCO, CEO’s de medios de comunicación globales (Turner, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Economist, Bloomberg, PRISA).

Por primera vez en 66 años, fue invitado el Secretario de Estado del Vaticano, el cardenal Pietro Parolin.

En total serán 128 participantes de 23 países.

Agenda de 12 temas:

El populismo en Europa: la amenaza de gobiernos «populistas» en Europa a las intenciones de Bilderberg.

El desafío de la inequidad: invitado especial, el Vaticano.

El futuro del trabajo: se hablará de la robotización

Inteligencia Artificial: uso de esta tecnología en lo civil y en lo militar (a cargo de la empresa Google Deep Mind)

EEUU ante las elecciones de medio término: En noviembre de 2018 se realizarán las elecciones legislativas para remplazar la Cámara de Representantes y un tercio del Senado norteamericanos. Para la élite liberal-financiera será una oportunidad crucial para intentar restarle poder a Donald Trump.

El libre comercio: En el nuevo mundo de Trump y el brexit, la emergencia de los proteccionismos y nacionalismos.

El liderazgo mundial de los EEUU

Rusia

Computación Cuántica: es el nuevo paradigma de computación distinto al de la computación clásica basada en el binarismo de unos y ceros.

Arabia Saudita e Irán: El enfrentamiento entre estos dos países podría devenir en la próxima gran guerra en Medio Oriente.

El mundo de la “posverdad”: Tema que comenzó a ser estudiado cuando la emergencia de las redes sociales posibilitó la multiplicación de sitios, blogs y portales alternativos que rompieron el cerco mediático tradicional.

“Acontecimientos actuales”: Espacio para el debate de temas misceláneos que siempre tienen su lugar en la agenda de Bilderberg.

  Lista completa de participantes a Bildeberg 2018:

CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE

Castries, Henri de (FRA), Chairman, Institut Montaigne

PARTICIPANTES

Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Chairman Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG; Treasurer, Bilderberg Meetings.

Agius, Marcus (GBR), Chairman, PA Consulting Group.

Alesina, Alberto (ITA), Nathaniel Ropes Professor of Economics, Harvard University.

Altman, Roger C. (USA), Founder and Senior Chairman, Evercore.

Amorim, Paula (PRT), Chairman, Américo Amorim Group.

Anglade, Dominique (CAN), Deputy Premier of Quebec; Minister of Economy, Science and Innovation.

Applebaum, Anne (POL), Columnist, Washington Post; Professor of Practice, London School of Economics.

Azoulay, Audrey (INT), Director-General, UNESCO.

Baker, James H. (USA), Director, Office of Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Barbizet, Patricia (FRA), President, Temaris & Associés.

Barroso, José M. Durão (PRT), Chairman, Goldman Sachs International; Former President, European Commission.

Beerli, Christine (CHE), Former Vice-President, International Committee of the Red Cross.

Berx, Cathy (BEL), Governor, Province of Antwerp.

Beurden, Ben van (NLD), CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc.

Blanquer, Jean-Michel (FRA), Minister of National Education, Youth and Community Life.

Botín, Ana P. (ESP), Group Executive Chairman, Banco Santander.

Bouverot, Anne (FRA), Board Member; Former CEO, Morpho.

Brandtzæg, Svein Richard (NOR), President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA.

Brende, Borge (INT), President, World Economic Forum.

Brennan, Eamonn (IRL), Director General, Eurocontrol.

Brnabic, Ana (SRB), Prime Minister.

Burns, William J. (USA), President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Burwell, Sylvia M. (USA), President, American University.

Caracciolo, Lucio (ITA), Editor-in-Chief, Limes.

Carney, Mark J. (GBR), Governor, Bank of England.

Cattaneo, Elena (ITA), Director, Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, University of Milan.

Cazeneuve, Bernard (FRA), Partner, August Debouzy; Former Prime Minister.

Cebrián, Juan Luis (ESP), Executive Chairman, El País.

Champagne, François-Philippe (CAN), Minister of International Trade.

Cohen, Jared (USA), Founder and CEO, Jigsaw at Alphabet Inc.  <<<—Google.

Colao, Vittorio (ITA), CEO, Vodafone Group.

Cook, Charles (USA), Political Analyst, The Cook Political Report.

Dagdeviren, Canan (TUR), Assistant Professor, MIT Media Lab.

Donohoe, Paschal (IRL), Minister for Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform.

Döpfner, Mathias (DEU), Chairman and CEO, Axel Springer SE.

Ecker, Andrea (AUT), Secretary General, Office Federal President of Austria.

Elkann, John (ITA), Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

Émié, Bernard (FRA), Director General, Ministry of the Armed Forces.

Enders, Thomas (DEU), CEO, Airbus SE.

Fallows, James (USA), Writer and Journalist.

Ferguson, Jr., Roger W. (USA), President and CEO, TIAA.

Ferguson, Niall (USA), Milbank Family Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

Fischer, Stanley (USA), Former Vice-Chairman, Federal Reserve; Former Governor, Bank of Israel.

Gilvary, Brian (GBR), Group CFO, BP plc.

Goldstein, Rebecca (USA), Visiting Professor, New York University.

Gruber, Lilli (ITA), Editor-in-Chief and Anchor “Otto e mezzo”, La7 TV.

Hajdarowicz, Greg (POL), Founder and President, Gremi International Sarl.

Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Chairman Foundation Bilderberg Meetings; Professor of Economics, Leiden University.

Hassabis, Demis (GBR), Co-Founder and CEO, DeepMind.

Hedegaard, Connie (DNK), Chair, KR Foundation; Former European Commissioner.

Helgesen, Vidar (NOR), Ambassador for the Ocean.

Herlin, Antti (FIN), Chairman, KONE Corporation.

Hickenlooper, John (USA), Governor of Colorado.

Hobson, Mellody (USA), President, Ariel Investments LLC.

Hodgson, Christine (GBR), Chairman, Capgemini UK plc.

Hoffman, Reid (USA), Co-Founder, LinkedIn; Partner, Greylock Partners.

Horowitz, Michael C. (USA), Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania.

Hwang, Tim (USA), Director, Harvard-MIT Ethics and Governance of AI Initiative.

Ischinger, Wolfgang (INT), Chairman, Munich Security Conference.

Jacobs, Kenneth M. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Lazard.

Kaag, Sigrid (NLD), Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation.

Karp, Alex (USA), CEO, Palantir Technologies.

Kissinger, Henry A. (USA), Chairman, Kissinger Associates Inc..

Kleinfeld, Klaus (USA), CEO, NEOM.

Knot, Klaas H.W. (NLD), President, De Nederlandsche Bank.

Koç, Ömer M. (TUR), Chairman, Koç Holding A.S..

Köcher, Renate (DEU), Managing Director, Allensbach Institute for Public Opinion Research.

Kotkin, Stephen (USA), Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University.

Kragic, Danica (SWE), Professor, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH.

Kravis, Henry R. (USA), Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, KKR.

Kravis, Marie-Josée (USA), Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute; President, American Friends of Bilderberg.

Kudelski, André (CHE), Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group.

Lepomäki, Elina (FIN), MP, National Coalition Party.

Leyen, Ursula von der (DEU), Federal Minster of Defence.

Leysen, Thomas (BEL), Chairman, KBC Group.

Makan, Divesh (USA), CEO, ICONIQ Capital.

Mazzucato, Mariana (ITA), Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value, University College London.

Mead, Walter Russell (USA), Distinguished Fellow, Hudson Institute.

Michel, Charles (BEL), Prime Minister.

Micklethwait, John (USA), Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP.

Minton Beddoes, Zanny (GBR), Editor-in-Chief, The Economist.

Mitsotakis, Kyriakos (GRC), President, New Democracy Party.

Mota, Isabel (PRT), President, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Moyo, Dambisa F. (USA), Global Economist and Author.

Mundie, Craig J. (USA), President, Mundie & Associates.

Netherlands, H.M. the King of the (NLD).

Neven, Hartmut (USA), Director of Engineering, Google Inc..

Noonan, Peggy (USA), Author and Columnist, The Wall Street Journal.

O’Leary, Michael (IRL), CEO, Ryanair D.A.C..

O’Neill, Onora (GBR), Emeritus Honorary Professor in Philosophy, University of Cambridge.

Osborne, George (GBR), Editor, London Evening Standard.

Özkan, Behlül (TUR), Associate Professor in International Relations, Marmara University.

Papalexopoulos, Dimitri (GRC), CEO, Titan Cement Company S.A..

Parolin, H.E. Pietro (VAT), Cardinal and Secretary of State <<<— VATICANO.

Patino, Bruno (FRA), Chief Content Officer, Arte France TV.

Petraeus, David H. (USA), Chairman, KKR Global Institute.

Pichette, Patrick (CAN), General Partner, iNovia Capital.

Pouyanné, Patrick (FRA), Chairman and CEO, Total S.A.

Pring, Benjamin (USA), Co-Founder and Managing Director, Center for the Future of Work.

Rankka, Maria (SWE), CEO, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce.

Ratas, Jüri (EST), Prime Minister.

Rendi-Wagner, Pamela (AUT), MP; Former Minister of Health.

Rivera Díaz, Albert (ESP), President, Ciudadanos Party.

Rossi, Salvatore (ITA), Senior Deputy Governor, Bank of Italy.

Rubesa, Baiba A. (LVA), CEO, RB Rail AS.

Rubin, Robert E. (USA), Co-Chairman Emeritus, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Treasury Secretary.

Rudd, Amber (GBR), MP; Former Secretary of State, Home Department.

Rutte, Mark (NLD), Prime Minister.

Sabia, Michael (CAN), President and CEO, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec.

Sadjadpour, Karim (USA), Senior Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Sáenz de Santamaría, Soraya (ESP), Deputy Prime Minister.

Sawers, John (GBR), Chairman and Partner, Macro Advisory Partners.

Schadlow, Nadia (USA), Former Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy.

Schneider-Ammann, Johann N. (CHE), Federal Councillor.

Scholten, Rudolf (AUT), President, Bruno Kreisky Forum for International Dialogue.

Sikorski, Radoslaw (POL), Senior Fellow, Harvard University; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Poland.

Simsek, Mehmet (TUR), Deputy Prime Minister.

Skartveit, Hanne (NOR), Political Editor, Verdens Gang.

Stoltenberg, Jens (INT), Secretary General, NATO.

Summers, Lawrence H. (USA), Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University.

Thiel, Peter (USA), President, Thiel Capital.

Topsøe, Jakob Haldor (DNK), Chairman, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S.

Wahlroos, Björn (FIN), Chairman, Sampo Group, Nordea Bank, UPM-Kymmene Corporation.

Wallenberg, Marcus (SWE), Chairman, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB.

Woods, Ngaire (GBR), Dean, Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford University.

Yetkin, Murat (TUR), Editor-in-chief, Hürriyet Daily News.

Zeiler, Gerhard (AUT), President, Turner International.