#fifa world cup 2022 prize moneys

[xplorestar]

#FIFAWorldCup #FIFAWorldCupFinal #Argentina

[latestnewsbysportstiger]

How Much Money Will Get Winner Of FIFA 2022 World Cup

There will be plenty of money on the line at the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar. 

While the focus for most teams will be on lifting the iconic trophy and representing their nations well, there is definitely a tangible benefit for success on the pitch. 

Prize Money FIFA 2022 World Cup

FIFA have allocated $440 million in prize money for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. 

This is an increase of $40m compared to the 2018 tournament, while just $358m in prize money was on offer at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil. 

[didalexiabreakupwitholgayet]

hello! sorry i am a little confused can you please explain the detail around the equal pay deal? has any more information come to light since then on what the equality actually means for the women?

i think equal pay is probably not the right words to describe the deal with the spanish team but rather a five year deal for equal bonuses with the men's team.

so looking at the agreement signed it 2022, it specifies that the premiums that the female players receive in percentages are equal to those that the players from the men's team receive. in addition, the image rights that soccer players will receive are regularised and improved and considerable improvements are agreed in the working conditions through 2027.

now remember that this agreement was signed in 2022, even before 'las 15' and the rubiales abuse case, so to me, the agreement is worth less than the paper that it is printed on. 🙄

according to relevo, rfef did not even give the players any additional bonus for winning the world cup on top of the prize money that fifa gave per player. however, they did receive small bonuses from rfef for winning the uefa nations league.

at the time of the deal it was lauded as the first step towards fully reaching equal pay, but we all know what happened before and after the world cup, so we are still a long way away!

[leveloneandup]

U.S. Soccer’s FIFA World Cup Prize Money Pool, Explained | WSJ

The U.S. women’s soccer team is about to play their first World Cup since reaching an agreement that gets them to share any World Cup prize money they might win with the men’s national team. The U.S. men’s team brought home $13 million from FIFA for reaching the knockout round in 2022. But the pool of prize money for the women’s tournament is just one quarter of the pool from the men’s tournament last year.

WSJ explores how much the USWNT can bring home in winnings and what role FIFA plays.

[thatsonemorbidcorvid]

Europe’s top football nations face a broadcast blackout for this year’s Women’s World Cup unless media can improve on their “disappointing” offers for the rights, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has said.

Offers from the “Big 5” European countries – England, Spain, Italy, Germany and France – were not acceptable to football’s world governing body and a “slap in the face” of the players and “all women worldwide”, Infantino said late on Monday.

“To be very clear, it is our moral and legal obligation not to undersell the FIFA Women’s World Cup,” Infantino said at a World Trade Organization meeting in Geneva.

“Therefore, should the offers continue not to be fair, we will be forced not to broadcast the FIFA Women’s World Cup into the ‘Big 5’ European countries.”

The World Cup is being co-hosted by Australia and New Zealand from July 20 to August 20.

Infantino said broadcasters had offered only $1m-$10m for the rights, compared with $100m-$200m for rights to the men’s World Cup.

Infantino first expressed his concern over the issue seven months ago in Auckland during the official draw for the 32-team tournament, saying that offers for the Women’s World Cup were “not acceptable”.

In March, at the world football’s annual meeting held in Rwanda, Infantino reported no progress with TV broadcasters while announcing a more than threefold increase in team prize money to $110m for the tournament after FIFA was criticised by players for not offering equal pay.

FIFA allocated $440m in prize money for the 2022 men’s World Cup in Qatar.

The Women’s World Cup now has standalone broadcast and sponsor deals rather than being bundled with the men’s tournament.

The FIFA leader suggested on Monday “public broadcasters in particular have a duty to promote and invest in women’s sport”.

“Women deserve it! As simple as that!” he said.

Due to the time-zone difference, Women’s World Cup 2023 matches will be held outside prime-time viewing hours for European markets but Infantino said that was no excuse.

“Maybe … it’s not played on prime-time in Europe, but still, it is played at 9am or 10am, so it is quite a reasonable time,” he said.

Some 1.12 billion viewers tuned into the 2019 Women’s World Cup in France across all platforms, according to a FIFA audit of the tournament.

One option for football’s governing body if broadcast deals cannot be reached in Europe is to stream games exclusively on its online platform.

[andiessoccerblog]

Women’s Soccer Globally: July 2, 2023

Around the world, women's soccer is in flux. There have been an incredible number of advancements in the last four years, but the increased media coverage has revealed a myriad of shortcomings as well. To be fair to the sport, I want to mention both here.

Norway and New Zealand were the only countries with equal pay between men and women in the 2019 World Cup; since then England, Brazil, Australia, and the USA have ratified similar policies. In Europe especially, women’s soccer is drawing sold-out, record breaking crowds. The women’s 2022 UEFA final drew 87,000 fans to Wembley Stadium in London, breaking the record for women’s AND men’s European championship game attendance. As much as western Europe remains a steady powerhouse of women’s soccer, other continents are starting to embrace women’s soccer as well. Morocco qualified for their first World Cup after unveiling a plan in 2020 to make the country a contender in the African Soccer Confederation, and proving that countries who commit resources to their women’s teams can and will see success.

However, equal pay in some countries definitely doesn’t mean equality is the priority in others. France, Canada, and Spain, all exceptionally well-funded and top-ranked teams, faced player strikes in early 2023 due to poor treatment of players by coaches and federations. In preparation for this world cup, Jamaica’s women’s national team has created a GoFundMe page just to cover expenses. 

Other aspects of women’s soccer have struggled to meet minimum standards as well. After FIFA hosted the 2022 Men’s World Cup in Qatar, a country where women aren’t treated equally to men, there was a little backlash. When FIFA tried to make Saudi Arabia Tourism a sponsor of the 2023 World Cup, there was a LOT of backlash, and FIFA eventually had to back off. In a similar vein of racist and sexist policy, 2022 saw the French Football Federation ban hijabs for soccer players at all levels as part of a law intended to keep religion out of public spaces.

FIFA confirmed recently that players will not be allowed to wear rainbow armbands in support of LGBTQIA+ equality. The federation has approved 8 possible wristbands that support various causes, but none that explicitly support LGBTQIA people. In a sport that includes more lesbians than you can count and boasts the first transgender olympic gold-medal winner (Quinn, from team Canada), this is causing a massive controversy. 

Despite the issues, FIFA maintains that they are making strides. In 2022 FIFA published the paper “Setting the Pace”, a report intended to benchmark the progress of women’s soccer globally. TV viewership, in-person attendance, and merchandise sales are up across the board. FIFA has also more than tripled the prize money available for the 2023 World Cup, although the men’s tournament was awarded four times as much. The president of FIFA has indicated that he would like to see an equal payout for the women as soon as 2027, but right now that is just an empty promise. 

In the opener of this World Cup, ticket sales proved that FIFA grossly underestimated the popularity of tickets, and games sold out in the first 24 hours of ticket sales. In response, FIFA moved the opening Australian game to a bigger stadium and has released additional tickets, which have now sold out for the second time. Again and again, fans and athletes alike prove that all over the world, people like women’s soccer.

[fandom-geek]

Australia's squad have criticised the gender disparity in World Cup prize money and the fact some nations do not have collective bargaining rights. All 23 Matildas players featured in a video posted by the Australian professional players union (PFA) three days before the tournament starts. The squad also called for all of Australia's women's A-League players to become fully professional. [...] Western Sydney Wanderers' Clare Hunt added: "Yet many are still denied the basic right to organise and collectively bargain." Brann midfielder Tameka Yallop said: "Collective bargaining has allowed us to ensure we now get the same conditions as the Socceroos, with one exception: Fifa will still only offer women one-quarter as much prize money as men for the same achievement." The total prize pot for the Women's World Cup, which starts on Thursday, is $110m (£84.1m), a 300% increase from the 2019 tournament, but less than the $440m (£336.4m) pot for the men at the 2022 Qatar event. The women's A-League's minimum wage for players increased from $16,344 (£8,509) to $20,608 (£10,730) in the 2022-23 season and is set to rise again in the 2023-24 campaign to $25,000 (£13,011).

[calacuspr]

Calacus Monthly Hit & Miss – The Spanish Women’s National Team and the RFEF

Every month we look at the best and worst communicators in the sports world from the last few weeks.

The 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup saw the Spanish national team deservedly lift the trophy for the first time after defeating England’s Lionesses by a single goal in the final at Stadium Australia in Sydney.

 The end of the tournament also offered a moment, at last, to pause and reflect on a breathless month of raw emotions, technical brilliance and numerous shattered records.

 Despite all of the quality, though, there still remained something of a sour taste in the mouth given the adversity to which so many of the women’s players were subjected.

 In the face of this, the players repeatedly proved that they were unafraid to stand up for what they believe is right.

 This was typified months before the tournament had even begun, when a player-led campaign successfully removed Visit Saudi as a sponsor for the 2023 World Cup.

 During the tournament, we saw the struggles of the Nigerian team, who were one of a number of competing nations that were locked in a pay dispute with their own federation.

 Former England striker Ian Wright weighed in on Twitter to show his total support for the Nigerian players after their superb and surprise victory over co-hosts Australia.

 Meanwhile, England goalkeeper Mary Earps regularly criticised Nike’s decision not to sell her jersey, despite her being one of the stars of the World Cup.

 There were also rumblings of discontent about the reported pay disparity between Lionesses coach Sarina Wiegman and her male counterpart, Gareth Southgate, even though Wiegman has had a far better record in the role.

 All of this came in the context of a vast gap in prize money offered by FIFA between this Women’s World Cup and the men’s 2022 edition in Qatar.

 Tactics, performances and professionalism had clearly taken great strides forward. At the same time, in the fight for equal conditions, it still felt like there is a long way to go.

 The plight of the women’s players was summarised aptly by iconic USWNT star Megan Rapinoe in an interview with The Atlantic. She explained that female players are constantly “playing two games at the same time” – off the pitch as well as on the pitch.

 Never could this have been more apparent than in the case of the eventual champions Spain.

 The Spanish team came into the tournament already under a cloud.

 At the back end of 2022, a group of 15 first-team players had sent identical emails to the Spanish football federation (RFEF) requesting the removal of Jorge Vilda as manager.

 The exact reasons have still not been specified, although it is understood that the players had issues with Vilda in terms of his personal behaviour as well as his tactical shortcomings.

 In response, the RFEF doubled down and backed their man, declaring that the 15 players had been “poorly advised” and threatened bans of up to five years.

 The mutinous players, dubbed “Las 15,” were cast aside and Vilda was given the ultimate vote of confidence to continue in his work.

 Prior to the World Cup, Vilda recalled just three of the 15: Aitana Bonmatí, Mariona Caldentey and Ona Batlle.

 "The RFEF has always been open to dialogue. The conflict is practically resolved, a few details would remain. We would be delighted if that were the case, but we look at the players who are committed and have shown their commitment," Vilda said after confirming his World Cup squad.

 The rest of the 15, including many FC Barcelona Femení stars who had just won the UEFA Women’s Champions League, were excluded.

 Accordingly, the ignored rebels treated the tournament in a similar manner, going through their individual summers with absolutely zero acknowledgement of any international football event which might be taking place.

 Whether it is considered petty and disrespectful or brave and honourable, what this stance certainly has done is exemplify the glaring political divide within Spanish women’s football.

 In spite of this internal turmoil, the selected Spanish players displayed miraculous resolve to concentrate on the sport during the World Cup.

 There were glimpses of the bitterness between the players and Vilda throughout their run to the final; most notably when two-time Ballon d’Or winner Alexia Putellas blatantly blanked Vilda as she was substituted in the semi-final against Sweden.

 When Spain arrived to face England in the final, the capacity crowd in Sydney showed whose side they were on as a chorus of boos greeted the announcement of Vilda’s name.

 In the final itself, Spain were fabulous and a superbly-taken goal from captain Olga Carmona was enough to win the game. After the match had ended, Carmona discovered that her father had passed away earlier that same day.

 Nonetheless, the 23-year-old captain still appeared at the homecoming party in Madrid only days later to greet the rapturous crowd and deliver a beautifully touching speech describing her incredible range of emotions.

 Back in Australia, the separate groups of celebrations at the full-time whistle illustrated the distinct dissociation between players and staff.

  For the trophy presentation, the RFEF president, Luis Rubiales, ensured that he was going to be front and centre.

 Whereas earlier in the year, the FC Barcelona Femení players had to collect their own medals after winning the Spanish Super Cup, this time the RFEF leader piggybacked onto the success of the women’s team to put himself firmly in the headlines.

 Firstly, Rubiales was caught on camera making an obscene gesture with his groin in the stands right beside Queen Letizia of Spain and her 16-year-old daughter.

 On the podium, Rubiales, having already unnecessarily hugged, touched the face and kissed the cheek of various English and Spanish players, abused his position of power one time too many as he planted a kiss on the lips of Spanish attacker Jenni Hermoso.

 Suddenly, even in their crowning moment, a time that should have been nothing but euphoria for each and every member of the squad, the achievement of the players had become overshadowed by the ugly actions of this man.

 Rather than swiftly dealing with their president, the RFEF was busy not reading the room and tweeting “Vilda In,” a tweet that was met with a mix of anger and despondency – described politely as a disheartening statement, and candidly as a disgrace.

 When it was finally time for Rubiales to face the music, he vociferously swatted away any criticism of his actions. Speaking to Spanish broadcaster COPE, he referred to the people who were unhappy with his actions as “idiots” and “stupid people.”

 “It was a kiss between two friends celebrating something,” Rubiales said dismissively. “Let’s ignore them [the critics] and enjoy the good things.”

 Within a day, however, Rubiales had performed a sudden volte-face and was releasing a video online with a half-baked apology.

 In a short address to camera, Rubiales stated: “I was surely wrong, I have to admit it, because at a moment of maximum effusiveness, without any bad intentions, without any bad faith, well, what happened happened.

 “We didn’t understand [the controversy] because we saw it as something natural, normal,” he added. “But outside it seems that a commotion has formed, and of course if there are people who have felt damaged by this, I have to apologise, I have no other choice.”

 It was evident from his words that Rubiales couldn’t see what he had done wrong.

 Shortly afterwards, despite saying “I didn’t like it [the kiss], but what do I do?” in an Instagram live video from the changing room after the incident, it seemed that Hermoso had also performed a U-turn when a statement attributed to her was released.

 "It was a mutual gesture, totally spontaneous because of the immense joy that comes from winning a World Cup," read the statement provided by the RFEF.

 “The president and I have a great relationship, his behaviour with all of us has been top notch,” it continued. “A gesture of friendship and gratitude cannot be given any more thought. We have won a World Cup and we are not going to deviate from what is important.”

 Astonishingly, it subsequently emerged that the ‘Hermoso statement’ had been fabricated by the RFEF.

 Rubiales was alleged to have unsuccessfully pleaded with Hermoso to defend him in a joint statement. Vilda then approached her family on three occasions, desperate for Hermoso to appear alongside Rubiales in the apology video.

 Having remained silent for as long as she could, Hermoso finally spoke out four days after the final and two days after the false statement had been released, as she released her own joint statement with FUTPRO.

 Hermoso said: "We express our firm and resounding condemnation of conduct that violates the dignity of women.

 "From our association, we ask the Royal Spanish Football Federation to implement the necessary protocols, ensure the rights of our players and adopt exemplary measures.

 "It is essential that our national team, current world champion, is always represented by figures that project values of equality and respect in all areas.”

  If Rubiales’ position didn’t already appear untenable, the statement from Hermoso triggered numerous senior voices, in the world of both sport and politics, to call for his resignation.

 Beatriz Álvarez Mesa, the president of Liga F (the top tier of Spanish women’s football), wrote an open letter to the government attacking Rubiales. Her comment that "the person that many of us know in private has been unveiled publicly" was utterly damning.

 The Spanish Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, described Rubiales’ gesture as “unacceptable” and said that his “apologies are not enough.” At the same time, the Minister for Equality, Irene Montero, labelled the actions as “a form of sexual violence that women suffer on a daily basis.”

 Tamara Ramos, a former employee of the Spanish players’ association and colleague of Rubiales, then spoke out about past humiliating treatment at the hands of the president.

 In response to Ramos, the RFEF condemned the allegations and announced that they would sue her for the false allegations.

 The stubborn, defensive approach of the federation was then superseded by Rubiales when a press conference was called for the following Friday morning, where it was widely expected that he would announce his resignation.

 However, in a turn of events that was as jaw-dropping as it was depressing, Rubiales took to the stage to defiantly repeat that he would not resign. He went on to describe “false feminism” as “one of the scourges of this country” and placed himself as the victim of a witch hunt.

 Worryingly, his comments received an outburst of applause by much of the audience, including from Vilda and Luis de la Fuente, the Spanish men’s team manager.

 Immediately after this speech, a catalogue of prominent women’s players condemned Rubiales and spoke out in support of Hermoso.

 Amongst others, Leah Williamson and Beth Mead nailed the Lionesses’ colours to the mast. Alex Morgan followed suit for the USWNT.

 “This is unacceptable. It's over. With you partner @Jennihermoso” was the simple but powerful message posted by Putellas.

 Bonmatí similarly tweeted: “There are limits that cannot be crossed and we cannot tolerate this. We are with you mate.”

 The situation was perhaps best summed up by Dutch player, Merel van Dongen, who used the president of FIFA’s recent words against him.

 Her post read: “Like the great great Infantino once said: ‘Women pick the right fights!’ Oooohh how the Spanish women are picking this fight. Proud to see how women, men, media and politics in Spain finally unite to change something that hasn’t been right for years. Se acabó. It’s time for justice.”

 Although van Dongen mentioned men, there was a conspicuously smaller number of male players who publicly backed Hermoso.

 Borja Iglesias ruled himself out of national team selection, Hector Bellerin vented his frustration via his Instagram story, and Barcelona captain Sergi Roberto quoted Putellas on Twitter to show support. Legendary Spanish goalkeepers David de Gea and Iker Casillas also denounced the “embarrassment” of Rubiales.

 Unfortunately though, the majority of men’s players, both past and present, have remained silent on the issue, suggesting a significant sociopolitical divide between male and female players.

 Top Spanish clubs then united behind the calls for Rubiales’ resignation, starting  with Cadiz, then Getafe, Real Sociedad and Atletico Madrid, who hopped onboard the bandwagon, before eventually both Real Madrid and Barcelona joined them.

 Hermoso herself responded to the press conference, confirming via her Twitter that the kiss was not “consensual”.

 Her teammates then launched a boycott of the national team. A total of 81 players – including the entire World Cup winning squad – co-signed a letter saying they will not be available for international selection until the “federation leadership is removed.”

 The weekend that followed the explosive press conference provided almost non-stop new developments.

 Many journalists attributed Rubiales’ attitude as being symptomatic of a long-standing issue within the system of Spanish football governance.

 This idea was further enforced when details of complaints against Rubiales going back as far as 2016 surfaced, as well as a disturbing video of disgraced former national team manager, Ignacio Quereda, intimidating and physically assaulting Spanish players.

 Wary of the unprecedented damage that this drama was doing to their national reputation, the Spanish government opened up proceedings against Rubiales to get him forcibly removed from his post via tribunal.

 Rubiales was then provisionally suspended from all football activity by FIFA.

 Yet still, the RFEF circled around their man and threatened to take legal action against Hermoso for her “lies”, releasing their own breakdown of the kiss, claiming that Hermoso had initiated it.

 The video evidence of Rubiales picking up numerous other Spanish players before Hermoso strongly opposes this allegation.

 In addition, the RFEF general secretary wrote to UEFA to request to withdraw Spanish clubs from European competition due to government involvement breaking UEFA impartiality protocols.

 UEFA have chosen not to respond to the RFEF request, nor make any comment on the situation surrounding their vice-president, raising questions about their values and vested interests.

 Sometimes, no communication can be just as detrimental as poor communication.

 A mass resignation of the Spanish coaching staff then left just Villa still in situ, but his position was hardly stable.

 Misa Rodriguez, a member of Vilda’s World Cup winning squad, demanded his removal before the players could consider a return.

 As eminent voices in world football, such as Lise Klaveness of Norway, continued to throw their support behind Hermoso, the people of Spain took to the streets in protest against the RFEF president.

 The issue went as far as the UN Human Rights office, who said that the public stance on the kiss could be “a turning point” in terms of sexism and misogyny.

Perhaps the most bizarre part of the story came from Rubiales’ hometown of Motril, where his mother, Angeles Bejar, locked herself into a Church saying she would go on hunger strike in an attempt to end the “inhuman, bloodthirsty witch hunt” of her son. Bejar has since been hospitalised and discharged.

Eventually, more than a week after the World Cup final incident, the RFEF released an official statement requesting Rubiales to resign.

 As it stands, Rubiales remains in post although how much longer he will stay there is anyone’s guess.

 The saga has been widely reported as a ‘Me Too’ moment for Spanish society. The hashtag “#SeAcabó” (“It’s Over”) has trended on social media and has become the slogan for an end to gender inequality across the country.

 In this way, weirdly, the actions of Rubiales could prove beneficial.

 A textbook response when an individual or organisation does something wrong, either deliberately or by mistake, is to acknowledge what has happened, apologise and then commit to fix it.

 On this occasion, even in his bumbled apology video, it was clear that Rubiales did not truly acknowledge what he had done wrong – the actions of the president and his organisation since has confirmed this.

 Instead, the lack of self-reflection and understanding has caused this story to become one of the great communications own goals in living memory.

As such, perversely, it may just be the catalyst to push forward a long overdue culture clean-up.

The words and actions of Rubiales have shone a light on a deeply entrenched problem within Spanish football, a problem that former national team member Veró Boquete says players have “been living and suffering for a long time.”

Even though UEFA have attempted to avoid the matter, at their own grand ceremony in Monaco at the end of the month, England boss Wiegman delivered a passionate speech, dedicating her Women’s Coach of the Year award to the Spanish players.

“We all know the issues around the Spanish team,” said Wiegman, stood alongside UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin. “It really hurts me, as a coach, as a mother of two daughters, as a wife and as a human being.

“The game has grown so much, but there’s also still a long way to go in women’s football and in society,” she continued. “This team [Spain] deserves to be celebrated and deserves to be listened to.”

In complete juxtaposition to Rubiales and the RFEF, the communication of Wiegman, the Spanish players, and the many others who have supported them, has been simple, concise and devastatingly effective.

Rubiales appeared to have cemented himself into a position of untouchable authority within Spanish football, but the force of the united messaging by those in opposition to him has completely shattered that misconception. 

Now, as the RFEF continue to dig themselves deeper into a crisis by watering down the long overdue statement of the Spanish men’s team, demonstrating yet again that their primary focus is to protect their president rather than the interests of those who they are supposed to represent, it almost matters not whether Rubiales leaves of his own accord, or is fired, as the patriarchy of the Spanish football federation has been exposed – and surely there is no turning back.

As Wiegman, Boquete and so many others have plainly stated: “It’s over.”

[rmfantasysetpieces1]

Players at 2023 Women’s World Cup to be paid fees directly by Fifa for first time

Fifa has revealed that players at the Women’s World Cup next month will earn individual fees directly from the global governing body for the first time.

The winning team’s players will receive $270,000 (£217,000) each in Australia and New Zealand, while each individual competing in the group stage will earn $30,000 (£24,000). The amount paid will increase the further the team progresses and in many cases, the figures far exceed players’ salaries at their clubs. Fifa’s 2022 benchmarking report found the average salary of paid players is $14,000 (£11,300).

England's Beth Mead will miss the World Cup through injury England’s Beth Mead says World Cup release date row ‘unfair’ on players Read more The players’ union, Fifpro, has praised the move as the “outcome of tremendous global collective action by over 150 national team players”. In November, Fifpro sent a letter to Fifa signed by 150 international players calling for greater equity, both financially and in conditions, and included a demand for players to receive a significant share of prize money directly.

The players stated in the letter: “Many players at the Women’s World Cup come into the tournament as amateurs or semi-professional, which undermines their preparation and, in turn, the quality of football we see on the pitch. Many players have no agreement with their member associations to ensure they receive fair and equitable treatment, including a guaranteed World Cup compensation, for example, as a portion of World Cup prize money.

“Therefore, no matter the amount of prize money available, players are not granted a share in what they endeavour on the field to earn – a share that would support their careers and livelihoods. This is especially true for our fellow World Cup competitors around the world who are still not yet fully professional.”

Fifa will pay out $152m (£122m) in total, more than three times more than the $50m (£40.2m) paid in 2019: $110m (£88.4m) is being put towards the performance-based fund, $11.5m (£9.3m) is being spent on the club benefits programme, and a further $30.7m (£24.5m) is being paid as preparation money.

The participating member associations will receive $1,560,000 (£1,254,224) for playing in the group stage with that figure rising to $4,290,000 (£3,449,117) for the winners.

REFERRAL

#RMSoccer

[ole7allaboutsports]

Who is Kylian Mbappe? The second biggest star of FIFA.

Kylian Mbappe, who is only 23 years old, has quickly emerged as one of football’s greatest players.

As Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo are nearing the end of their football career, Kylian Mbappe is heading a new generation of world-class athletes who are expected to rule the game of football in the upcoming years.

He started his career performing for AS Bondy, where he remained for 11 years. Kylian Mbappe’s father oversaw his initial training. In 2016, when he was 17 years old, he scored his first goals for the team, making him Monaco’s youngest goal scorer. In 2017, he relocated to PSG.

How much money will team receive if you win the 2022 World Cup? When the 32 teams competed four years ago, a sum of $400 million got divided among them as prize money.

Original story first published at Ole7’s feature — Stars of FIFA

Have you placed your bets yet on your favorite sports team? Check out Ole7.io and win on live tournaments.

[keyio11]

The best part of playing casino games is that they offer a tremendous amount of money, including real-time bonuses. 2022 fifa world cup schedule There are many different types of casino games available and each one comes with its own set of rules, bonuses and prizes. Online casinos can be conveniently opened on any device with internet connection. They require no download or installation on the user’s computer.

[aymanmatnews]

FIFA World Cup 2022 prize money.. Prize money distribution for the FIFA Men's #WorldCup in 2022: 1st prize - $42 million (Winner) 2nd prize -$30 million (Second place) 3rd prize - $27 million (Third place) 4th prize - $25 million (Fourth place) 5th - 8th (ousted in quarter-finals) - $17 million each 9th - 16th (ousted in the round of 16) - $13 million each 17th - 32nd (ousted in the group stage) - $9 million each https://www.instagram.com/p/CmFIKbNNBtF/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[influencrwomen]

Qatar FIFA World Cup 2022 Prize Money

Qatar FIFA World Cup 2022 Prize Money22 November 2022Qatar FIFA World Cup 2022 Prize Moneyby Mohsin KhanThe FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar starts on November 20, and it will end on 18 December.by Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for Winner Team $42 million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for Runners-up $30 million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for 3rd place $27  million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for 4th place  $27  million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for 5th -8th place  $17  million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for 9th-16th place   $13  million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googlePrize Money for 17th-32th place    $9 million USDby Mohsin KhanImage: googleA total of 32 teams are participating in the Qatar FIFA World Cup 2022by Mohsin KhanImage: google Read the full article

[worldnews2day]

FIFA World Cup Prizes 2022FIFA World Cup Prizes 2022

FIFA World Cup Prizes 2022FIFA World Cup Prizes 2022Though the trophy itself would be worth millions, the winning team does not get to keep it, they are presented with a replica.Though the trophy itself would be worth millions, the winning team does not get to keep it, they are presented with a replica. Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social mediaHowever,  for players winning the world cup it can result in increased fame and  publicity, leading to lucrative sponsorship advertising deals and  possibly hefty contracts.Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social media"In my life, the best timing is always my timing," Ronaldo told reporters on Monday. "I don't have to think about what other people think.Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social mediaThere  are also cash prizes for the teams and players at the world cup. The  winning team of the 2022 World Cup will receive $42 million,Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social mediaAt  that time a total of $20 million was allocated as total prize money,  from which $2.2 million was given to the winners. They get much more  now, the winning team in 2022 will receive $42 million.Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social mediaThese organizations then determine how the winnings will be distributed, and how much will go to each individual player.Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social media– $42 million – to the winning team – $30 million – runner up – $27 million – third placed teamImage Source: social mediaImage Source: social media– $25 million – fourth placed team – $17 million – to each team eliminated in the quarter-finals (4 teams)Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social media– $13 million – to each team eliminated in the round of 16 (8 teams) – $9 million – to each team eliminated at the group stage (16 teams)Image Source: social mediaImage Source: social mediaThe world’s most powerful operational rocket Falcon LaunchedThe White Lotus Season 2Read More Visit...  www.worldnews2day.com Read the full article

[trendy-talker]

Revealed prize money for the 2022 World Cup

Revealed prize money for the 2022 World Cup

The country that goes all the way to win the 2022 World Cup will earn $50m (£45m). FIFA’s total projected revenue for the year is expected to be about $4.6bn (£4bn). With $2.6bn (£2.3bn) coming from broadcasting deals and an additional $1.35bn (£1.17bn) from sponsorship and marketing agreements. FIFA say that they have seven official partners including adidas, Coca Cola and Visa. FIFA have…