#giltedge | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

wilkes19189559-blog · 5 years

Text

uganda gorilla permit uganda gorilla trekking permit cost

youtube

uganda vs rwanda for gorilla trekking http://bit.ly/gorilla-trekking-tour Just click here to see our Hot 3 Day Gorilla Trekking Tour

Every client wants to get the best out of the fee paid for gorilla safaris in either Rwanda or Uganda and the first question that arises is-When is the optimum time for gorilla trekking? While hill gorillas in Uganda and Rwanda can be trekked throughout the whole year, drier weeks of June, July, August, and early September then December up to Feb will be the most preferred. There is absolutely no guarantee that it won’t rain as Bwindi Impenetrable Forest is a tropical rain forest and its climate is inspired by micro conditions of the area. During high season gorilla enables to visit gorillas in Rwanda’s Volcanoes National Park and Bwindi National Park is at USD1500.00 and USD600.00 per person respectively. For individuals who are price sensitive, should take benefit of rwanda low season gorilla enables at USD1050.00 to book a Rwanda gorilla trek. READING MORE about best time for gorilla trekking.

Henk Graaff, managing director at SW Africa, said gorilla trekking has always been extremely popular with U.S. travelers. He adds we can expect Ellen DeGeneres' recent trip to the gorillas to boost the recognition of gorilla trekking for the U.S. market even further.

Ingrid Baas, general supervisor at Wilderness Safaris Rwanda, agreed: "I am sure that DeGeneres' commitment to the conservation of the gorillas and the security of the forest will stimulate more travelers to do the same and to visit Rwanda."

The added exposure generated by the visit of the TV star comes at the same time that the Rwanda Development Panel doubled the gorilla permit cost from $750 to $1,500 per person.

At $1,500, the Rwanda gorilla permit is reported to be the highest in the region; the allow costs $600 in Uganda and $400 in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Is the steep increase really worth the money? Or is it easier to opt for Uganda instead for a distinctive gorilla-trekking experience?

"There is absolutely no easy answer as each country is unique and offers different experiences," said Steve Round-Turner, Abercrombie and Kent's regional sales and marketing director.

The case for Rwanda

Baas acknowledged that both Uganda and Rwanda offer great opportunities for gorilla trekking. However, she said that she personally favors Rwanda, as most of the terrain through the gorilla trekking is a bit more open and for that reason it is easier to get a good view.

Says Baas: "Rwanda is a very clean and organized country; travel distances are relatively small, and the roads generally are good. In Rwanda, the view of the volcanoes around you whilst trekking the gorillas is breathtaking.

For Betty Jo Currie, Currie & Co. Moves Unlimited and Safari Benefits member, Rwanda is also the preferred destination. The main reasons, in her opinion, are that the treks can be shorter and the chance to visit the Dian Fossey Base and its scientists.

Suzanne Teng, Abercrombie & Kent product supervisor for Africa, said a growing number of guests have also been attracted by the new luxury lodges opening in Rwanda, including Wilderness Safaris Bisate Lodge, One & Only's Nyungwe Lodge and the soon-to-open Gorilla's Nest as well as Singita Kwitonda, scheduled to open late in 2019.

Teng adds Rwanda is normally regarded as a bit "less difficult" in terms of terrain for tracking in comparison with Uganda. On the other hand, the altitudes can be higher, this means it continues to be a task for fit and active clients.

Round-Turner added that Rwanda keeps growing its diversity with the reintroduction of lions and rhinos to Akagera National Park, making it an excellent addition to the gorillas within Parc National des Volcans (Volcanoes National Park).

He said: "Rwanda is a land of extreme beauty, each flex in the road revealing a more beautiful vista than the one before. Nynungwe Forest is ideal for people attempting to hike with 130 kilometers (80 mls) of trails and the chance of viewing 13 different primates."

Sean Kritzinger, co-owner and executive chairman at Giltedge Africa, agreed that diversity is a key benefit for Rwanda. He explained the Volcanoes National Park in Rwanda with its fantastic monkey trekking adds an additional experience to a gorilla-trekking visit. "So, if clients want to see both fantastic monkeys and gorillas we recommend that they visit Rwanda."

Another advantage for Rwanda, according to Graaff, is that gorilla trekking is more accessible to meetings and incentives travelers because of the infrastructure the country provides. He explains Rwanda has been ranked being among the most popular conference and events places on the continent by the International Congress and Convention Association.

Gorilla trekking is a sustainable operation that benefits local communities tremendously in Rwanda. Graaff explained that with gorilla allow prices going up, the communal revenue-sharing rate in addition has risen from previous 5% to 10%, which really is a very good income for the communities.

He said: "Neighborhoods surrounding the Volcanoes National Park have observed substantial financing in community tasks like building universities, hospitals, local business

https://nson72358073995.tumblr.com/post/181808828161/uganda-gorilla-permit-uganda-gorilla-permits-2018

#uganda gorilla permit #rwanda gorilla permits #gorilla permits rwanda #gorilla permit rwanda #rwanda gorilla permit #gorilla trekking uganda price #gorilla trekking rwanda prices #gorilla permit #uganda vs rwanda for gorilla trekking #uganda gorilla trekking tours #gorilla trekking tours uganda #3 day gorilla trek uganda #rwanda gorilla trekking tours #uganda gorilla trekking cost #gorilla trekking uganda cost #uganda gorilla trekking permit #rwanda gorilla trek cost #rwanda gorilla permit cost #1 day gorilla trek rwanda

1 note · View note

nson72358073995-blog · 5 years

Text

uganda gorilla permit uganda gorilla permits 2018

youtube

uganda vs rwanda for gorilla trekking http://bit.ly/gorilla-trekking-tour Just click here to see our Hot 3 Day Gorilla Trekking Tour

E MAIL US Here http://bit.ly/gorilla-trekking-tour

Every client wants to get the best from the fee paid for gorilla safaris in either Rwanda or Uganda and the first question that arises is-When is the optimum time for gorilla trekking? While hill gorillas in Uganda and Rwanda can be trekked throughout the complete year, drier weeks of June, July, August, and early Sept then December up to February are the most preferred. There is absolutely no guarantee it won’t rain as Bwindi Impenetrable Forest is a tropical rain forest and its own climate is influenced by micro conditions of the region. During high season gorilla allows to visit gorillas in Rwanda’s Volcanoes Nationwide Recreation area and Bwindi Nationwide Park reaches USD1500.00 and USD600.00 per person respectively. For those who are price delicate, should take advantage of rwanda low season gorilla allows at USD1050.00 to book a Rwanda gorilla trek. Read More about best time for gorilla trekking.

Henk Graaff, managing director at SW Africa, said gorilla trekking is definitely very popular with U.S. travelers. He adds we can get Ellen DeGeneres' recent trip to the gorillas to improve the popularity of gorilla trekking for the U.S. market even more.

Ingrid Baas, general supervisor at Wilderness Safaris Rwanda, agreed: "I am certain that DeGeneres' commitment to the conservation of the gorillas and the security of the forest will stimulate more travelers to do the same and also to visit Rwanda."

The added exposure generated by the visit of it star comes at the same time that the Rwanda Development Table doubled the gorilla permit cost from $750 to $1,500 per person.

At $1,500, the Rwanda gorilla permit is said to be the highest in the region; the permit costs $600 in Uganda and $400 in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Is the steep increase really worth the amount of money? Or is it easier to opt for Uganda instead for a unique gorilla-trekking experience?

"There is absolutely no easy answer as each country is unique and offers different encounters," said John Round-Turner, Abercrombie and Kent's regional sales and marketing director.

The situation for Rwanda

Baas acknowledged that both Uganda and Rwanda offer great opportunities for gorilla trekking. However, she said that she personally favors Rwanda, as the majority of the surfaces through the gorilla trekking is a bit more open and for that reason it is easier to get a good view.

Says Baas: "Rwanda is an extremely clean and organized country; travel distances are relatively small, and the roads in general are good. In Rwanda, the view of the volcanoes around you whilst trekking the gorillas is breathtaking.

For Betty Jo Currie, Currie & Co. Moves Unlimited and Safari Benefits member, Rwanda is also the preferred destination. The primary reasons, in her opinion, are that the treks can be shorter and the opportunity to go to the Dian Fossey Base and its own scientists.

Suzanne Teng, Abercrombie & Kent product supervisor for Africa, said a growing quantity of guests are also attracted by the new luxury lodges starting in Rwanda, including Wilderness Safaris Bisate Lodge, One & Only's Nyungwe Lodge and the soon-to-open Gorilla's Nest as well as Singita Kwitonda, scheduled to open up past due in 2019.

Teng adds Rwanda is normally regarded as a little "less complicated" in conditions of surfaces for tracking when compared to Uganda. On the other hand, the altitudes can be higher, this means it is still a task for fit and active clients.

Round-Turner added that Rwanda keeps growing its variety with the reintroduction of lions and rhinos to Akagera Nationwide Park, making it a wonderful addition to the gorillas within Parc Nationwide des Volcans (Volcanoes Nationwide Park).

He said: "Rwanda is a land of extreme beauty, each bend in the street revealing a more beautiful vista than the one before. Nynungwe Forest is ideal for people wanting to hike with 130 kilometers (80 kilometers) of trails and the chance of viewing 13 different primates."

Sean Kritzinger, co-owner and professional chairman at Giltedge Africa, agreed that diversity is a key benefit for Rwanda. He described the Volcanoes Nationwide Recreation area in Rwanda using its fantastic monkey trekking adds an additional experience to a gorilla-trekking visit. "So, if clients want to see both fantastic monkeys and gorillas we advise that they visit Rwanda."

Another advantage for Rwanda, according to Graaff, is that gorilla trekking is more accessible to meetings and incentives travelers thanks to the infrastructure the united states has to offer. He explains Rwanda has recently been ranked among the most popular meeting and events destinations on the continent by the International Congress and Convention Association.

Gorilla trekking is a sustainable operation that benefits local areas tremendously in Rwanda. Graaff described that with gorilla permit prices going up, the communal revenue-sharing rate has also gone up from prior 5% to 10%, which really is a very good income for the areas.

He said: "Communities surrounding the Volcanoes Nationwide Park have seen substantial financing in community projects like building schools, hospitals, local business

https://monk573.livejournal.com/729.html

1 note · View note

annaboleyne · 6 years

Photo

co-authored with @gevherhans and @giltedges // see end for additional notes

In light of the recent spike in interest in the Turkish period drama Payitaht: Abdülhamid, we thought it important to inform potential viewers about the series and what it represents. [1]

1. Who was Abdülhamid II?

Abdülhamid II was the 34th Ottoman Sultan and the last monarch to effectively hold absolute power over the crumbling empire. Although he initially appeared to support liberal reforms set in motion by his predecessors and opened the first session of an elected parliament, Abdülhamid soon proved himself a paranoid, iron-fisted autocrat. Under the pretext of preserving the state, he dissolved parliament and suspended the constitution, concentrating power in his hands alone.

Abdülhamid's reign was marked by brutal persecution of minorities and fierce suppression of political dissent. An estimated 80,000-300,000 Christian Armenians and Assyrians were slaughtered in state-backed pogroms known as the Hamidian Massacres, after which he became nicknamed “the Red Sultan”. His targeting of political opponents, civil society, and the press turned the Empire into a virtual police state; as described by historian Eugene Rogan, Abdülhamid's reign was an era in which “political activists were imprisoned and exiled, newspapers and magazines were heavily censored, and citizens looked over their shoulders before speaking, fearful of the ubiquitous spies working for the government.”

Among other factors, discontent with Abdülhamid’s despotic rule led to the Young Turk Revolution in the summer of 1908; the sultan was forced to capitulate, and the suspended 1876 constitution was restored. After a short-lived conservative uprising the following year, Abdülhamid was finally deposed. Although his brother was proclaimed sultan as Mehmed V, he was effectively a figurehead with no actual power.

2. About Payitaht: Abdülhamid

Payitaht: Abdülhamid is a Turkish historical television drama depicting the reign of Abdülhamid II. Premiering in February 2017 on state broadcaster TRT, the show quickly became one of the most-watched shows in the country. To the uninformed viewer, it may at first glance appear to be another period drama in the vein of Muhteşem Yüzyıl or English-language productions like The Crown. It goes without saying that these works of historically-oriented popular entertainment should be examined critically for how they depict the past, and in turn, impact the present. But while these series first and foremost seek to entertain, Payitaht: Abdülhamid has a much more devious goal in mind: propaganda. The show is a strident work of historical revisionism, ultimately seeking to advance a xenophobic, anti-democratic, conspiratorial worldview in which “a free press, secularism and democracy are the work of foreign powers, religious minorities and godless liberals”.

The show has particularly drawn criticism for its rampant anti-semitism. Abdülhamid attempts to distinguish between “bad” Jews (Zionists) and “good” Jews (those loyal to the state), but still falls face-first into anti-Semitic tropes and conspiracies straight out of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. “Soon all humankind will only live to serve us Jews, chosen by Jehovah,” proclaims the Jewish villain in one scene. Jews are consistently framed as suspicious and potential traitors, and other minorities fare no better. While the Hamidian Massacres and pogroms go completely ignored, the series collectively portrays the Armenian minority as traitorous foreign collaborators, a stereotype that still carries in modern Turkey, implicity justifying any violence against them. [2] Additionally, figures such as Abdülhamid’s nephew Sultanzade Sabahaddin, are demonized as traitors for their opposition to absolutist rule and support for liberal, democratic principles. Loyalty to the empire — that is, the sultan himself — is the absolute metric by which Abdülhamid defines morality.

Overall, Abdülhamid relies heavily on historical revisionism to purposefully push a conservative, xenophobic narrative. For example, he relationship between the sultan and Theodor Herzl — journalist, activist, father of modern political Zionism, and Abdülhamid’s arch-villain — was much more complex than the series portrays. While he failed to gain approval for a Jewish settlement in Ottoman-controlled Palestine, Herzl and Abdülhamid were not adversaries — in fact, he was inducted into the prestigious Order of the Medjidie, an honor bestowed only fifty times in history. [3] But most insidious perhaps is how the serial whitewashes the sultan and casts him as a beleaguered hero: oppressed and not an oppressor, always justified and righteous in his actions. In the world of Abdülhamid, his historically paranoid worldview is rendered undisputed truth.

3. Why you shouldn’t be creating content using Payitaht: Abdülhamid

Payitaht: Abdülhamid is state-backed revisionist propaganda, plain and simple: a tool to advance the ideology, goals, and worldview of President Erdoğan and the conservative Islamist AK Parti. Under Erdoğan’s regime, Turkey has witnessed the deterioration of civil rights and political freedoms, a process that has rapidly accelerated after the 2016 failed coup. Among other things, Erdoğan’s government has most infamously jailed more journalists than any other nation, imprisoned opposition leaders, censored the internet and the press, conducted military operations responsible for the deaths of Kurdish civilians, and been suspected of rigging elections. This is far from an exhaustive list of the harm that he and his party have inflicted.

Unlike the international hit Muhteşem Yüzyıl — which drew ire from Turkish conservatives for depictions of sexuality and alcohol, creative license, and portraying imperial figures as flawed, even unsavory characters — Abdülhamid has been enthusiastically embraced by Erdoğan and his Islamist supporters. Despite a brief disclaimer stating it is merely “inspired” by historical events, many of the show’s fans believe it to be a “historically accurate” account that reveals “true history” suppressed by dastardly foreigners. This view is shared by prominent figures such as Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmuş, who visited the set and praised the series for “‘shedding light’ on the sultan’s life ‘in an objective manner.’”

Furthermore, uncanny parallels between Erdoğan and Abdülhamid have not gone unnoticed by critics and supporters alike. “History repeats itself [...] these meddling foreigners now call our president a dictator, just as they used to call Abdulhamid the ‘Red Sultan,’” stated Orhan Osmanoğlu, an extant descendant of the Ottomans. Payitaht: Abdülhamid only builds on a mythos linking the two leaders; government officials even reportedly encouraged the production to place the president’s words in the sultan’s mouth. By planting the idea of precedent and injecting present ideas into history, Abdülhamid takes an active role in shoring up Erdoğan’s cult of personality.

Although it may be tempting to mine the lavishly-produced Payitaht: Abdülhamid for content, the fact remains that it is state-backed revisionist propaganda, an ideological tool used to bolster a government responsible for ongoing human rights violations. Ask yourself: considering the context, what am I endorsing by using this content? Content, even recontextualised, cannot exist entirely in a vacuum separate from its creators, monetary sponsors and intended goals.

While enjoying television series and researching related historical topics, it is vital to remain conscientious and show sensitivity to people affected — both to those who suffered under the late Ottoman Empire and the modern Turkish state, still within living memory, as well as Turkish citizens and minorities struggling for their rights today. The series may be fantasy, but the damage done has palpable effects. Former parliamentarian Aykan Erdemir aptly describes Abdülhamid as “state propaganda designed to appeal to viewers’ worst instincts and leave them with a revisionist, conspiratorial narrative of Turkish history [...] while this account of Abdülhamid’s reign is almost pure fiction, the plight of Turkish citizens living under Erdogan’s increasingly sultanic rule is very much real.”

NOTES

[1] While this PSA may be misconstrued from a Western context as Islamophobia, considering the present and global problem that Islamophobia presents to the modern world especially under Trump, it is not the intention nor the case. Islamophobia is a global force, however, in the context of power differentials, especially in the what is often (problematically) classified as the MENA region, it cannot be considered a factor in both the Ottoman Empire’s and the modern Turkish state’s history of oppression of both ethnic and religious minorities such as Kurds, Alevis, Armenians, Assyrians and Chaldeans.

[2] This is incredibly harmful given the modern Turkish state’s long enforced policy of Armenian Genocide denial, suppressing Armenian, Turkish and other intellectuals who acknowledge the Armenian genocide as well as foreign and investigative journalists. This in turn incites more hate speech against Armenians than any other group in Turkey.

[3] This is not in any shape or form an endorsement of what has now become the modern ideology of Zionism.

#historyedit #perioddramaedit #weloveperioddrama #payitaht: abdülhamid #long post

310 notes · View notes