#spatial interference and energy quantization | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

xenonreality · 4 hours ago

Text

Guess what, I'm stupid & the reasons below

I could have just printed out a new probe attachment for my qifi x max 3 & it would have stopped hitting the bed during calibration.

Or at least in theory.

Also, I haven't touched my cad design in a very long time & I don't plan to. I haven't felt stable & or safe in my housing situation & have been dealing with a lot of issues regarding my housing.

On top of, in general, not knowing if getting into anything with my 3d printing would end up making me even sadder thanks to becoming homeless & no longer being able to do anything with it, & or even moving such that now, I no longer have a way to work on my l28 engine.

It has caused me to stop working on everything, while I end up dealing with this. its been months. I hate it.

Oh right, yeah so onshape, please let me know, but onshape doesn't seem to have just a sculpting tool that allows me to take a block & slowly shave & drill it into the shape I want. I literally have no idea how to stop getting these random sides & edges that become pointy & I can no longer remove them.

I see a lot of great cad on it, truthfully. But! I have no idea what I'm doing & for me it makes sense to just add a thing then trim it to shape using basics like my fingers. this curve equals roughly this, eyeballed. I never use math & I don't care about it. I spent an inordinate amount of effort & time learning how to never need it to just know things for multiple fluid frictional field changes & snaps of magnetic filaments that then release & change flow rate, align molecules to flow differently, how they vibrate to relay information to & from each other to force a lower resistive state to increase total mass in a given spatial-temporal moving quantized point of space-time, how & why they vortex & spin, collapse various interference waves & decay vibrate off into spirals looking like standard radiation particles.

Basics, you know the foundations of things.

Which means, it needs to roughly, at these speeds & constantly of these gaseous parameters through these averages of these specific momenta values, that are your maths base energy values at non-moving vector tensor 3d geometric window values, which equate to these directional back & forth resonant harmonic information relay slope angle lower resistant back & forth movement changes towards a given information & mechanical large macro based particles stuck together change that alters towards a given point of entropy to make it become more equal relative to the materials substrate energy value (less molecules, not more) pressure movement contained in these specific temporal-spatial regions of space-time moving among these vector angles to then orbit around mass, to next mass, to next mass, to final total directional point from opposite to which it started. Which is Newtonian...

Anyways....

It just means I want to sculpt the block by using the basics of something like in city skylines, because it been around forever!!! & whatever these words are, annoy me. Boolean apparently doesn't mean what I thought it meant, but that was probably someone else's cad, I dunno.

It's not raise up in this spray paint can area, or this square, or lower, or this diagonal cutter slice here area, or shave down & sand paper like this, or smooth like that, its not round like this particular angle straight through the entire block & make sure its edge is like this, with this previously made shape specific to shape this like this....Its a bunch of whatever & I dunnos.

Which immediately makes me not want to do it, because I end up focusing on things that I can't get because I know the angle & shape but the stupid program doesn't let me do that & says!!!! "nope, because I can't, not that you can't, its because I can't" Which this limitation is stupid & I dislike it. Its honestly a great program, onshape, seriously it is. I'm really well & truly aware I'm shit at it & I have never done any schooling for it, I barely finished the one youtube video & decided to get to my last post about the damn thing I was making.

If there is a better point & build up & push down, cut, shave, smooth, etc tool set I would love it because, screw numbers & edges, vertices, & more. that stuff sucks & doesn't matter when making a thing. Its why we use clay still on many, MANY, different designs before we just scan it in & say, "we cad designed it" after slicing it to be cut in a CNC & or formed in a cast, to milled, to printed & so on.

People prefer being able to do that, as much as I sound like an old fuddy duddy, because its sooo much faster to design these things that trying to come up with this edge change with different magnitudes & all that, that don't blend faces & edges, & leave this terrible little shitwad of a fucking (im going to kill you!!!! I'M GOING TO MURDER THIS STUPID FUCKING EDGE FACE!!!!!) pointy part that wont blend into the 2 different faces & edges that meet at this exact point that means the program hates everything you do to it.

Let alone, its amazing to me people manage to make huge scale cads without scanning, its awesome!! I just have fucking no clue how, I love the different materials & the simulations that can happen in it. All of it is really cool. But, because my brain works this way, I fucking get stuck on 3-8 hours of design that barely gets anywhere, then I get sad because then....

OH FUCKING RIGHT!!!! I could be homeless, not even have the 3d printer, be needing to figure out if the people running my housing want to kick me out for another thing, will I have enough filament, I know I can't afford more later, most likely...Let alone have access to the thing, if I end up homeless, because that is actually better than being with my abusive parents. Literally, its better to do that!!!! Fucking!!! *throws hands up in the air & groans*

The pattern remains consistent, parents lead to me having episode, leads to inpatient, leads to next homeless, leads to nothing good. I try to get job, leads to problems mentally (maybe with a great group of people to help, i dunno, but not holding that breath) & or problems parents because becoming independent & boom, homeless.

They were, apparently, able to illegally talk to my clinic & have them specify I'm not doing enough (see that other long life update post) to survive, they can't get me. I've had 13-15 different (i literally can't remember them all, its so many) case managers, from they had group therapy to enough people got laid off (their words) that no more group therapy, 4-5 therapists (several saying I'm too smart for therapy) over the phone 2 or 3 leaving their company after only 2 or 3 visits over the phone with me, one psychiatrist that wanted to yell & scream at me saying I just wanted stimulants (my adhd meds we were trying to find the right one(s) to take) after saying that non-stimulants have given my psychosis & behavioral issues (hooray for a-typical paradoxical responses, not me having to explain to another doctor yet again that im not trying to lie & I've been diagnosed since I was kid I am ADHD) BUT WAIT! Anti-psychotics, get...*snickers*..*smiles*...get this, so they make me more psychotic & I learned to just not tell doctors because they don't accept it. Like when I was a kid, taking the non-stimulants. Because, "ITS NOT IN THE LITERATURES!!!! ITS NEVER BEEN A PROBLEM WITH ANY OF MY OTHER!!! PATIENTS!!! SO YOU MUST BE LYING!!!"

That'll make sure you don't tell them anything other than its not doing something & you want off of it. I love how many studies don't include a-typical paradoxical responses to medications from people who are also diagnosed treatment resistant, together with fast metabolizer which means you have to take more just to get something & often become more tolerant to them quicker too, together with higher rates of side effects.

Love it...*smiles* they are garbage people, honestly. They think you can't be the person who is the rare one, so you must be lying, because others! Not the medical history, then constant history of mistreatment & being told you are lying by them to make sure you don't trust them (not the science, though) at all because they are shitty paranoid people in power who group up whenever one of them makes a mistake like shitty bad apple police.

Anyways, the psychiatrist (lisa green) wanted to prescribe me spravto (s-ketamine) to me & have me take it at my apartment. I asked her, because I was pretty sure I heard at one point this was the case, "Don't you have to take that at a hospital or something?". She says, no you can apparently take it at home, I go, "no way, wow. that's actually pretty interesting... I didn't know that." Because she's the doctor. How the FUCK!!!!! *REPEATEDLY TAPS ONE HAND INTO THE PALM OF THE OTHER* am I supposed to know?!!!!

Retards saying you know, lying out their ass you aren't supposed to trust your doctor.

fucking stupid.

So, as I'm struggling to find even a single pharmacy that will fill it, end up calling a specialty pharmacy I got redirected to from others & my...Insurance?..Clinic?...I forget, it was like 2 years ago or a year ago, something like that. I mean, I went through 3-5 months trying, getting no where. All of the sudden, I'm faking my issues & malingering, says her. Unbeknownst to everyone, even the people I see at the clinic. I get hit like a truck in my SSI court hearing, with them thinking I'm lying about all my shit. So much so my lawyer thinks its appropriate to say before hanging up, well at least I wasn't lying to my psychiatrist about my symptoms, after calling them out for not doing any real work & telling them complaining about having 3000+ pages of medical documents to go through isn't a good look & if the judge sees my psychiatrist saying this then you should have as well but you didn't!!!!

That, was a huge blow. Then I couldn't just go to another clinic. I don't even know if staying with them is required for my housing. But, honestly they are real weird & threatened to evict me the last time after everything was talked about & it was fine, then suddenly it wasn't. I can't have these engines in my apartments, but guess what not only that but not outside of it in the front. My neighbors? They can have 4-5 bikes, broken chairs, rolled up rugs, tables, etc etc etc, all of which are still there. Rules for me, not for others.

Simple discrimination. Meanwhile, trying to get my meds here, eventually the new psychiatrist comes in, the old one, lisa green here, never saw me again & left. The clinic, never apologized. No body told me I'm not faking it. Bad apples.

New one comes in, right?! Goes, can't help you, here's this website, I know you have issues calling people & I know its harder for you because you have to get transport & you'll have to do it like every 2 weeks & or whatever but tough it up & suddenly do this thing that is very difficult for you as the disabled person you are. Suffice it to say, never happened. He left back in nov.

New one, same kind of deal.

Been on practically the whole list of them. 5 SSRI, 3-5 snri, tri & tetracylics, triptans, 1st, 2nd, 3rd gen anti-psychotics & atypic anti-psychotics, mood stabilizers, anti-histamines, thyroids, anti-cholinergics (which I haven't said too often but man, coming through that mess is a thing), alternative treatments with cannabis & psychedelics (definitely the better ones, not consistent, have tolerance issues, can be too intense, doctors don't like them claim they cause issues, they didn't the opposite, standard doctors stupid & or just need to say this because license problems), to even off-label uses of regular medications like sildenafil (generic viagra which btw, is still the best anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, & anti-psychotic I've ever taken even if it is off-label with great studies supporting that, take that fuck face garbage dr abdallah that said & claimed (never proven, where's your source?! huh, where's your source!?!?!) he looked it up. he never showed if he did to me, I found it in 5 min of just googling legit credible studies involving it for those treatments with double blinds & even long term, even real world versus clinical, which means its been a thing for a long ass time, fucking doctors lazy ass abdallah).

What it is, is a person is disabled (me) & meds don't "fix" that, even 6+ years of a great therapist, working my ass off with him back then (earnest ford), then inpatient, outpatient, groups, accommodations for jobs (hearing-aids....wow, it fixes everything), its over 2 decades of work from me as a child until now (33) & it being me finally accepting I was, & a fuck ton of retarded (belief system, views, your perspectives, your very dsm, how you practice & think you aren't literally the same group of people who had transexuality as a mental disorder in the dsm, that dont' go over variable & real world controls for multiple gut mirco biome, financial, opportunity, therapies, the entire relevant genomic sides, the rna sides, the enzyme sides, the peptide sides, the environmental influence on those basic bio-organic compounds side in a real world setting (ONLY CLINICALL!!!! ONLY THAT IS LEGIT!!!!! ONLY THAT, ALL OTHER THINGS NOT AFFECT & EFFECT RESULTS & OURS ARE BETTER & ARE RUN TO BE REPLICATED TO MAKE SURE THEY GET THE GOALS & RESULTS OF SALES FOR OUR HUGE MONEY MASTERS WHO MUST ABSOLUTELY MAKE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE FOR STOCK HOLDERS & OUR DEGREES WERE FUNDED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS ENDEAVOR NOT FOR HELPING OUR PATIENTS!!!!! REMEMBER THAT!!! ......*looks to the side & whispers to them* who let the glowie rich douche in? I didn't know Dwight but actually shitty bad Dwight character suck up existed... *other person looks at them but they are much older* first time?) & for what its worth, running huge studies requiring 100's of millions of dollars is something else.

Would be terrible if we were to gain all the data broker data, then use all our now much cheaper & better tools & machines to better average out that influential data variable for a basic chaos theory mathematics thermodynamic moving over time total benefit & or base line, to even detriment of said compound taken with these given constant observations in a setting that has multiple things accounted for, for the given trajectory & likeliness of any given meds success & or failure to treat any given patients.

Same for brain scans in a 3d manner down to individual neuronal firing real time manner, turns out recently thats far more practical than before. Even better if you can use sound & light wave interference at intersecting grid lines together with much less significant fmri scans that don't require that huge tesla value.

It does mean a helmet is on you though. So there's...There is that.

Don't worry, now food intake for glycemic index over time, together with protein changes, enzyme changes, basically all of your blood is able to be monitored in real time now with a few sensors placed on your skin. Same for changes in your gut microflora, lucky us! Pill that measures as a few tiny sensors, to a sound & light based change to pheromones, sweat, heat index, gas composition from light passing through, electromagnetic changes for a similar thing (basically your gut is fully known, lets put it that way), same for even small & larger (small not in the nano but packs of cells) immune system movement & changes, how that cell signaling happens now as well to other organs & even rna signaling (although not as precise, it is what it is), same for all stool & urine samples being automatic (mostly, it depends again) for many things your body is doing.

Now, why don't we do this? Because the Nazi's would use it against you....I mean the ceos, I mean, politicians, I mean...the insurance companies, I mean the influencers, I mean the data brokers, I mean the stock marketers, I mean the religious leaders, I mean the advertisers, I mean the echo chamber cults online that attack you for being differenters, I mean the Ice agents, I mean the nsa, I mean the FBI, I mean the hold moneys in stocks politicians who no longer keep gaining advantages because others have the info & will now know the movements & trade deals...ers, I mean the ones who bet on ceos having various health problems-ers, Soooo, I guess I really mean everyone & anyone who seeks to take advantage & harm one another in a capitalistic society whose only value is in fighting & being above someone through all of their productivity, wealth, accolades, fame, power, & control they have.

too soon? no.

You are afraid of information being used against you. Its what that paragraph up above means. You know they have power & are fine using it, while having taken the ideological control of many of your nation, together with being a part of your social media, your politics, your lawmaking, & more to the point you can't possibly not know you would need to fight, you spineless cowards.

To a degree. you kinda all are. You flinch & let them yell at you & decide to harm & destroy many things, then blame people like myself who point it out, "because you are making it worse" so you then enable them so you don't get hurt as much.

Its not a "concession" to allow for only 1 of your daughters/sons/whatever to die if it saves the rest. You allow for them to kill many of you for now reason, other than you feel you can stop others from dying that will die not long after, not changing from that decision.

You then help, get up there, & say, "It's time for you to do it" to yourselves. Because otherwise they'll go after me now.

You are terrible, those of you who do that. You'll never have been, or could be good. But, you know that, knew that, & hate when someone shows you are no hero.

Stop them, because you'll only be consumed later & become the monster you tried not to be.

Anyways, for that whole thing, meds be hard. clearly. Turns out, therapy doesn't magic up fixes for disability away, & even with meds together it won't. Sometimes, everything is just that...Fucked. Not going to work.

Eventually, you tell your patient that you can't kill the cancer & you are going to die. You make them comfortable. Society ain't changing. The treatments haven't worked for 2 decades. I've put in more work than the doctors & it ain't happening. I'm tired & I need to be comfortable for sometime to heal & allow myself to accept I can't ever do what I want & I'll never get the chance to do any of those things I have come up with. Without a fuck-ton of help from people whose job is literally making themselves look important & showing off, & or making money like its nothing, to keeping patents & shitty society going the same way so they keep being powerful & important, from those that understand it changing requires themselves to sacrifice for others when they are self-centered narcissists that don't even care about the system being what it is, thinking that people like me don't deserve anything, that they couldn't possibly be "beaten" by my (whatever that means, its a "we work together and support one another, lean on each other" not I'm the biggest bestest retard gabagoo shitwad mentality, oooh pay attention to me stuff) designs, instructions, maths, & more, it takes people saying the country is shit, the people are shit, the whole system is shit & we have to follow through on tearing it down & rebuilding the sunk cost fallacy garbage going on.

But that isn't fun or exciting. That doesn't get views. That doesn't make you look perfect & portray your actions as being the best, but hey sometimes you can't have that. It was the best we could do, then changed it faster next time to the better one, & we kept building up & doing that. It's never a "one solution" the "this fixes everything" its a steady effort over time for people like me that, while fuck I know I could join you with enough people to help me & money too, will often not stop hating you. We know damn well you don't care about us.

Its annoying we have to have our needs validated. That we look bad, when we don't only because we make you uncomfortable to see. I look normal on the outside, so I can never be disabled. I have to be, because I'm tall, handsome, & often well spoken, lying about it (oh & I'm white male privileged to hell & back, but apparently my shit-tastic life (that you would totally love & if you did it (without any of my mental issues included in your mind there while you went through it, magically) it would be soo much better & you would love living it, you sound like my sisters, mother, father, grandpa, multiple psychiatrists, nurses, doctors, & random douche fucks who gave me their opinion for no fucking reason) & not trying hard enough because it will "just come to you" & "others will just give it to you" & "you didn't try my technique" & "this new med" & "this new therapy" & "these injections" & "this brain magnetic stimulation" & "it doesn't matter just do it anyways, homeless but you made that thing you wanted" & "you are not positive enough, thats the problem" & "even though you've been right this entire time about how all these events will play out, you don't know! you don't know really, this time, not the other ones, this time" & "they aren't as racist & shitty as you think they are" & "they wont discriminate against you" & "you should believe their lies & see what happens after because at least you got "friends" for a while" & "if you go up there they want to put in the same effort & not blow you off & don't see you as the new one that we treat poorly into the group that might allow you to become friends" & "men aren't as bad off as women in life, you should just suck it up" & ....fucking shut up.

That's not even a small taste of the overwhelming bullshit I've gone through in my mental health care treatment. People are trash. The majority of you are shit, in a moment for a little while you act nice & not trash. That means you choose to not be trash, for a while. Which means you are intentionally trash, all the time.

This is coming from a person with a fuck ton of experience talking to real people, in real life, in normal to extreme situations. I don't like basically any of you.

& I am lonely, want friends, have & will love just the same as anyone else. I love how little anecdotal this is. People break down all the time & say this when they crash out where their friends are not going to be something they have to care about anymore, as a random they'll dump the worst shit they actually feel & think of it all as with no troubles while guard themselves against those who are tasked with the job of helping.

Why? Because those fuck-tards of doctors are literally worse than their bosses, because they have to defend a license & can't ever make mistakes. They lose everything & have a mountain of money they need to send out to various other shitty shit-wads who will remove all their things & their idea of identity is removed, that makes them afraid as all their perceived validation & value in themselves & from others is removed & they are scared beyond belief of it ever happening. So they group up together & shit on the ones they try to help. They complain about the system, the system is run by them, & controlled by them. They can actively change their system, decide to say fuck you no, I know you are wrong stupid gov't system & then change that too. They don't.

they are lazy.

but, they are over worked too. made to be so. Not enough willing to do the right thing, drop out of the system, destroy the whole thing, make it better. Not enough willing to be uncomfortable like i've been my entire life, always having no stability, everything always up in the air, no future that isn't me trying to keep my shit together, no chance of it getting better for me, no treatment that's going to make it so I can work in your shitty broken system of garbage people making more garbage shit, get fed into more garbage shitty things, making more garbage shitty people.

They say, nah, I'll complain. I'll put up an example. No, you have to fight the whole thing, you have to actually change the laws, the people the fucking god damn organizations, the way you do the studies, & all the rest. You want to change the system, the system is everything.

The entire thing is people, who follow through on fucking garbage rules, garbage laws, garbage ideologies, garbage philosophies, garbage perspectives (like im sorry you feel that way directed at me, when they know they are garbage), garbage religion, garbage science, garbage ways of doing something, garbage everything that makes up the very person themselves.

You make garbage people, you get a garbage country, garbage world. A gabagoo world.

I'm clearly fucking gifted & intelligent. I'm intensely amazing at things, come up with shit that makes others with PHDs think that's amazing we should do that & others that go you only learn that if you have one. I'm a person that is good at something & have no shame in it. I'm not confident, I'm fully knowing I am what I am & I accept it. I am better than everyone at this shit I do.

I proved that so many ways its insane! I literally even tell people about how to get information that say they don't have from compiled data that gives you conversations just from junk random garbage data collection from the numerous crap around you on my youtube channel & show you how you can use that to spy on anyone, anywhere, as far back as you can with all of that data easily gotten with no money needed. Yeah, no hacking required retards trying to doubt the claims without ever listening & looking.

I showed from that & several recent posts how you can literally look at the past in real time exactingly how it happened for people here on earth, without using telescopes. Yeah. simple shit, I thought. Guess multiple colleges barely pull it off, for a shitty version, means it wasn't simple. Whoops, my bad, I thought everyone already has PHDs & are better at this than I am & know everything more than me, better math, & challenge me because they obviously are right & i'm wrong, excuse the 3-6 hour long video explaining everything about how you are wrong & didn't account for what you should have & oh, btw, why is it you didn't already know this? I suppose you didn't want to watch something like that, because he's a blow hard who is overconfident, Oh, guess what, Here's another science study where I say I told you so, & yup the same as me years ago, & I was right again, looks like you are behind me, still...

Slow!!! You are slow! How come you are so, FUCKING DAMN SLOW!!!! Keep up! god damn it, why do i have to explain everything to you. What, do i need to bring in fancy flashing animations so you can focus, slow person? Not happening, remember I'm disabled. Thinking you aren't the lazy person, you absolute fuck up who never looked in making yourselves look like shit awkward thought hey know everything garbage gabagoo-wads over here, is a special kind of treat. Look at you soothe your ego to make yourself feel better because you can't come up with solves & designs for things people have been working on for hundreds of years or decades!

Look at the fucking stupid ones! soothing themselves. My content isn't even about that!!! *cries like a baby* boohoo. You call me lazy, get called out. You made this fucking weird as hell too, thinking your ultra rare as fuck, often many of you having nice parents, money, safety, opportunity, socially you could afford having friends that would be used to hurt you & manipulate you, continued into a hard school that is sooooooooooooooooooo FUCKING HARD!!!!! with your fucking able ass bitch ass fucking stupid selves that was never once doubted about on your abilities in a society set up for you to specifically do well, with your specific personalities, your specific needs, your specific ways of phrasing, your specific ways of showing you understood something, your specific ways of being allowed to be successful, your specific ways of allowing for anything to be viewed acceptably, your specific ways of testing, validating, & even worse all of it is set up to only allow for those that can do it your ways to be done when you go against (somehow) the status quo of hyper-individuality (except you aren't its only successful because you do it together, each and everyone of you only succeeded because you did it that way!) so you think its actually amazing how good you are, how different you are, how much better than them you are.

Oh wait there's more! *snorts imaginary line of cocaine* fuck billy mays, I'm here bitch!

Even worse still you imagine yourselves to be as if you include people & aren't discriminatory. That it is fine if you ask for help from others, after proving many many tests later you need it. Tests you can't get to, you can't take without having other tests done that require it to be done after spending money you don't have, time you don't have, are aware the person helping you to get them hates you needing their help, that you want to not mask, but if you do that you then are lying, because if you don't then its not really the "real you" (because the mask is the only allowed thing to be shown to you, otherwise you are angry) then you have to go to another place, do it again, then you can only get some of this help, not that help, but you need all the help, but its unfair (fuck up insecure garbage we need to be better & we can't have those disables coming in & performing better than us on a level playing field, that hurts our ego & our personal internal self identities we are made to have through years & decades of grooming propaganda about many many views in a cultural zeitgeist that i've grown accustom to & I'm now special & above others & would look bad in it if I didn't beat you & i no longer fit in to the continuation of this mob rule that I actively helped make continue & make seem great & good. Which makes me not good & doing bad things, as well as being worse at stuff, im supposed to automatically be better at than the disables...) if we get all the help needed. See parenthesis.

That's nothing!!! Because from tests, we go into a society that is only full of this garbage that is only full of hatred & a total refusal of changing their minds on this side that its unfair & that it needs to change. Even when we come in & say we'll join you in making the change. Nope. I now have to accommodate you, & I deserve more pay for less work & its easier for me than for you.

Now its wrong that we say this & show you your hypocrisy. Then, its totally not similar to transexuality pronouns, sexuality as a whole, mental disorders, to chronic illnesses, & more. Oh, did I strike it big before it happened to me?!?!!?!

FUCKING I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE GOING THROUGH!!!!!

You know small part, while you get to have a lovely rest of you life, comparatively.

"hey, your life is much better than this person who is functionally not even aware of life happening!!! You should see that its now about comparing each other & you should be grateful yours is sooo much better, even if those other people got discriminated based on ethnicity, religion, sex, & more its nothing compared to my gatekeeping retard ass whose actively destroying our disabled asses ability by arguing with you to have anything get done about this!!! Let me gatekeep for this person who literally doesn't even know whats happening!!! Its hard on them, not me, the fucking caretakers, to deal with it. Let me project like somehow I'm not also disabled as a result of having to do this shit full time & I feel I'll never be counted in & seen, validated & heard like I should be! So now I'll just FUCKING PROJECT!!!! my feelings on to this post being written."

LEARN TO SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Get over yourselves, become the person the united state gov't kept alive after level radiation exposure happened to them, so they could study the effects of that on their body, against their wishes.

become the numerous tortured individuals by various militaries & gov'ts around the world who experimented on prisoners of war, prisoners (civilian), minorities, disabled, poor & desperate (medications, homeless, orphans, etc), & or any number of them still going on even here in our "lovely" US of A!

Shut up, stop gate keeping you fucking retards.

There will always be worse, it invalidates all of us needing help now & could have it.

Your society is a fucking full on flat, dead as fuck, nothing to laugh about, joke. simple as that.

You guys think you are great, but you aren't. You are a percent of a percent of a percent, that make it. & that's from the larger total whole of those with abilities & whose meds & treatments worked. Those who could even just talk to others, find a community, become friends, not hated, not have them worry about their fame, money, jobs, level of emotional care & effort they (narcissistically say online is SOOOOO FUCKING MMMMUUUCCHHH!!!! to put in, woow! you are so selfish & take up so much of my energy, & time, & i hate you for it.) have to put in. That is literally narcissism.

Seriously, that's a symptom of that. You love the person, understand it takes a good deal & sometimes you have to even when you know it will cost you because you love them, but make sure you maintain that balance & boundary & it doesn't become to the point of them manipulating you & or hurting you.

If you are so terrified, thats a trigger from a traumatic abuser in your past. You aren't a narcissist! You are experiences an emotional trigger response to avoid anything that might hurt you like that again. FUCKING HOW MANY OF YOU!!!! OMG!!! ITS EVERYHWERE!!!

Its shit I hear, then paranoid bullshit excuses, making up things they do, to so many other shitty strategies & more that ruin everything you very much pretend to stand for. You are broken, not healed, need help, it won't be done in decades, people!!!

Somehow!!! SOME FUCKING HOW!!!! We, we are supposed to be a part of you all?! We want to join you? You aren't the ones we have to prop up by excusing your actions, letting you get away with it, running the majority of your shit jobs & tasks that make your world run? Its you all (& we are with yyooouuu, yyyaaayyy!!! *nopes out*) against them, join us big people that are not as big as them that help them gain money, every fucking video, in all corporations, in trying to continue the gov't & its laws as it is, you all who continue using I won't have what I have now, nor the comfort with it, nor being special, & so many more things, versus them.

You have no idea how ready we are for this shit to die, you don't know. Fuck you all, we all actively hate you. You defend needing corporations, the money, the fame (no you wont have it after others can join in, have a level playing field), the "special knowledge" because only the special people with special instructions you pay the extra special amount after driving specially to the special place can you practice the special knowledge to be & do the special stuff that makes you special, only those with the people that are nice & can talk correctly get to become a part of the group who gets to learn (granted this is more for those with autism & or those poor as fuck with anxiety, cptsd, etc stuff), only the people like you get to have friends because you are the ones who do *all* the work often making sure to avoid each other until needed (but thats normal), the only way for this to be joined into is through this thing that isn't a thing, but oh boy is it a thing but nobody tells me the thing, you must know the thing, lets avoid the thing, but now you don't know the thing & half of them don't know the thing, now you say the thing, they are annoyed you said the thing, now everyone knows the thing, somehow you don't think this is bad & shitty as a species we only communicate & bond constantly (lose the hair, slow the healing, have to bond & learn & communicate effective strats to keep healing going & alive longer together, know the things say the things you know, stupid die not say things) How are you not the autistic ones! seriously! what the fucking fuck! you go against all of your evolutionary history & all that makes you as a species anything at all, you fucking gabagoo garbage shit-wads.

only the right ones allowed in, oh wait, all the "right ones" are fucking shit. you example is the same as portal 1 or 2 where you fed in a bad one to fuck it all up. You are the bad examples of what to be.

You are the "normal" in you dsm!!!!???? You are the shit that dies off in the past because you were never good. You keep around shitty behavior, shitty designs, shitty societal constructs, shitty ideas of value, shitty philosophies, shitty corporations, shitty government, shitty people, shitty capitalism, shitty socialism, shitty democracy, shitty fascism, shitty everything & then complain!!!!

You make a book & all follow through together then each & every single one of you don't like the thing because it was wrong & nobody wanted to change their perceptions of their shitty selves as being shitty & included in the book. Which made it so shitty authority figures made shitty claims with shittier evidence through multiple shitty studies with shitty famous people who did shitty work to then verbal diarrhea into some shitty pages some shitty things that were only ever mostly shit.

all so good people, who were acting correctly to a shitty life, shitty society that had them dealing with a lot of shit, would stop acting correctly & becoming worse & more shitty so they could function the correct shitty way in the shitty system that was built shit-tley by worse shitty people who like being shitty, so they could be seen as shiny shit that was better shit, the best shit, always the great shit ever shitted out a shit hole & shit pipe in the shit system that turns good things into shit to be shat out.

That's the shitty lie they shit-tly conned you into believing wasn't what you were doing, while making sure they were fine with the shit they had happening to them so they could be used like shit to do less shit, worse & make even less shit at the end of it all anyways, so that way they can say more shit was done & its harder shit, so its actually really good shit, thats the better shit, but they have the best shit yet to come. like them.

so, now you aren't special shit, so socialism means your stuff will never be validated & or appreciated be afraid of it because you can't live a good life in that shit. No way, I'm much better shit than that shit. If I was made to have this person writing this have the same level of shit as me, then that would make it so I wouldn't be better than him already. Same with all my shit before no longer being as good of shit as before. We have to keep this shitty shit called capital going & a capitalism happening, because its the only shit.

So, yeah my clinic is pretty shitty, mostly full of shitty people, & shitty times, with a bunch of nothing happened but shit. I tried really hard, they said I didn't do it again their way, then I was lying, they hated I didn't trust them, gave them the information, they....did they lose it or it never happened, not filed like before I don't know what happened I know it was supposed to be, stop following up with me on that roi, I don't believe the previous before stuff that older than 7 years because you can't get it thanks to records not being kept, also fuck you patient you don't do anything but lie & I'm better than you 'cause I'm the shit that runs this shit. Just like before. Which means its not going well. Then, oh right I don't want to try because everything is shit & no one wants to help. People say they "understand" but don't want to help. People saying that I don't try (look WAAAYYYYYY UP THERE!!!) hard enough to survive & can't get me to do anything, I mean, look I know he's disabled & needs help but I don't think that much or that he even is (somehow) oh wait, I clearly am, so they hate the work needed with someone they need to help but won't admit to it & will not change their actions & will do nothing different.

Like you. My clinic is like you, all, even like my family. You choose to say, "you could do this" I can't. That you have to "something, I am saying important not true things & my perspective is garbage but I don't want to do anything other than make it about you so I don't have to do anything at all" & I don't stroke you ego & say yeah, sure. I say, done it, this is everything to that didn't work & I need you to do this.

Nothing like watching people online, so many people I've at'd, straight up exemplify the same behavior. Not liking me mocking you? No time, again? Complaining about that, for them? How come my stuff doesn't do well? I want to keep this here, or roof bla bla, meds etc, I don't have fear fight, I know people could look in & or I could but I'm just going to steal & not credit you for that stuff you came up with & or join the ones already doing it, to I don't believe it because fuck you it would kill my entire life & identity let alone social status, I don't have to, want to, or even (now I have to literally go against all the knowledge I have here) believe you are right about the very things I made entire videos explaining & agreeing with you about showing that I know it is but you now aren't.

Want to be "friends" fuck off. be a friend. Want me to somehow show up somewhere you know I can't! fuck you. want me to do something I can't, fuck you on that. Want me to have money & time for something I don't! Fuck you all just as much on that one. want me to do that thing to have that money that i can't do, fuck you with the sharpened splayed end of a rake right up your urethra! You gate keeping bourgeois suck. Self made through a bunch of people with money making sure you make it. Pushing hard & making a platform even exist.

You had it easy from the start & it was hard. Try my fucking sets & lifts, bitch! Try solving shit like I do, then going.....

FUCKING!!!! RIGHT!!! I could have just printed out this piece I can't sculpt to form for myself on a 3d printer to size correctly so I can just fit this stupid thing together, oh wait I know I can do that but I'm going to keep it in my head & know I can't just easily do that, why isn't this fucking work!!!!! IIINNNNNGGGGGG!!!!

I was stupid, I would have made things, I then would have had all these things after that would have been exactly the same, trump voted in, case managers deciding to leave, suddenly no help from the parents, lack of food, home, meds, treatment, intentional discrimination & mistreatment together with fucking malpractice level of shit, a fucking garbage community there talking behind screens illegally about my history, thinking something is something when it isn't, knowing full well my family is plotting & scheming to look nice & act nice like always...Standard ass social engineering.

They don't apologize, I need to fix it, somehow prove my disability with them (AGAIN!! EACH FUCKING GOD DAMN SHITTY CASE MANAGER, THEN ITS EVEN WORSE BECAUSE HOLY SHIT WHY IS IT BAD I CAN'T DO SOMETHING & THEY LOOK AT ME ANNOYED & ANGRY I CAN'T & MY EMOTIONS ARE NOT WANTING TO BECAUSE OF THE TRAUMA I HAVE!!! YOU FUCKING RETARDS!!!) instead of them even being able to do treatment, having to hear I need inpatient because they can't even do basics!!!!

fuck you. You are the ones incompetent. Perpitude. Not even a word. Not wrong though, completely you are.

I'm stupid...Yeah...Stupid in a way that tries to save me from what's to come because it hasn't changed once. The same pattern, parents got involved too, sped up the homelessness. Shitty clinic, this one here is better in the broken system. Believe us. Trust us. Show us that our broken system works, that you'll have SSI even & while you live in poverty everything will be better because, its better than not that. We can't have disableds coming around here messing up our "let them eat cake" bourgeois party. We are cool. Don't let them join or having anything & stop believing he deserves our help, us to approach, or anything. WE, yes we, are the good ones, here here *toasts like a shit-wad gabagoo* and all that!

I actively plot for my brighter future & will be gleeful in all ways to watch you all suffer & die horribly. Leaving on that spaceship airship, you fuck tards & you ain't stopping me. You can fucking get wrecked by the next pandemic & or garbage nazi shitwad to anything else.

#arizona #springerville #SMI #severely mentally ill #disabled #housing #lore dump #oc lore #my oc stuff #homelessness

0 notes

pamphletstoinspire · 7 years ago

Photo

Catholic Physics - Reflections of a Catholic Scientist - Part 101 - Truth Cannot Contradict Truth - Part 6

With Images:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/catholic-physics-reflections-scientist-part-101-truth-harold-baines-1f/?published=t

The Triple Alpha Collision Process: the excited nuclear energy level of unstable Beryllium-8 matches an excited energy level of carbon-12 to create a resonance enhancement for the rare triple collision — so we get carbon/biochemistry (Caption for linked image)

________

“Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth – the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient “coincidences” and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist.” — Paul Davies,

________

” The argument (the Anthropic Principle) can be used to explain why the conditions happen to be just right for the existence of (intelligent) life on the earth at the present time. For if they were not just right, then we should not have found ourselves to be here now, but somewhere else, at some other appropriate time.” — Roger Penrose,

________

“One doesn��t show that something doesn’t require explanation by pointing out that it is a condition of one’s existence. If I ask for an explanation of the fact that the air pressure in the transcontinental jet is close to that at sea level, it is no answer to point out that if it weren’t, I’d be dead.” — Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos.

________

“A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.” — Fred Hoyle

________

SECTION 1: General Considerations

1.1 SOURCES

Some of the material in this section is drawn from a post on my blog, Philosophic Issues in Cosmology 6, summarizing an article by George F.R. Ellis. The Anthropic Principle has been discussed extensively in books and articles. There is a concise summary by Robert Koons in his philosophy lectures, giving various interpretations, with arguments for and against each. (I’ll summarize some of these below.) A good collection of articles with different (and opposing views) of the Anthropic Principle is given in “God and Design” (editor, Neil Manson). Possibly the best web source on physics and cosmology is the 2013 article by Stephen Barr, Anthropic Coincidences and the Multiverse Idea, (You could read that and skip this piece—but I wouldn’t want you to do that, would I?) A more extended recent review, including critiques of “anti-anthropic” articles, has been given by Luke Barnes, Finally, the British Astronomer Royal, Sir Martin Rees, has consolidated the anthropic coincidences into six dimensionless parameters, “Just Six Numbers,” values of which have to be narrowly limited for a universe such as ours to exist.

There are many versions of the Anthropic Principle ranging from the Weak Anthropic Principle, WAP, which tautologically observes that if the universe weren’t fit for us to be here we would wouldn’t be here discussing the principle (see the Penrose quote above), through the Strong Anthropic Principle, SAP, that the universe has been fine-tuned for intelligent life (us), on up to the Completely Ridiculous Anthropic Principle (by Martin Gardner—you complete the acronym).

1.2 THE INTERPRETATION OF GEORGE F.R. ELLIS

George F.R. Ellis, a South African astrophysicist, a winner of the Templeton Prize and a prolific author on cosmology and its relation to religious belief, has written a fine article on philosophic issues in cosmology. In his presentation of the anthropic coincidences, he focuses on the special nature of physical laws that allow for the presence of life, rather than on their improbability (all quotes are from the linked article):

“One of the most profound issues in cosmology is the Anthropic question…why does the Universe has the very special nature required in order that life can exist? The point is that a great deal of “fine tuning” is required in order that life be possible. There are many relationships embedded in physical laws that are not explained by physics, but are required for life to be possible; in particular various fundamental constants are highly constrained in their values if life as we know it is to exist…What requires explanation is why the laws of physics are such as to allow this complex functionality (life) to work. …We can conceive of universes where the laws of physics (and so of chemistry) were different than in ours. Almost any change in these laws will prevent life as we know it from functioning.”

Ellis posits as a first requirement for the laws of physics “the kind of regularities that can underlie the existence of life:” laws that are not based on symmetry and variational principles are unlikely to produce the kind of complexity that would be required for life. He also sets up general conditions that allow for organic life and cosmological boundary/initial conditions. In this respect he cites the following as necessary:

“Quantization that stabilizes matter and allows chemistry to exist through the Pauli exclusion principle;

The number D of large spatial dimensions must be just 3 for complexity to exist.

The seeds in the early universe for fluctuations (quantum fluctuations) that will later grow into galaxies must be of the right size that structures form without collapsing into black holes…

The size of the universe and its age must be large enough…we need a sufficiently old universe for second generation stars to come into existence and then for planets to have a stable life for long enough that evolution could lead to the emergence of intelligent life. Thus the universe must be at about 15 billion years old for life to exist.

There must be non-interference with local systems. The concept of locality is fundamental, allowing local systems to function effectively independently of the detailed structure of the rest of the Universe. We need the universe and the galaxies in it to be largely empty, and gravitational waves and tidal forces to be weak enough, so that local systems can function in a largely isolated way.

The existence of the arrow of time, and of laws like the second law of thermodynamics, are probably necessary for evolution and for consciousness. This depends on boundary conditions at the beginning and end of the Universe.

Presumably the emergence of a classical era out of a quantum state is required. The very early universe would be a domain where quantum state is required. The very early universe would be a domain where quantum physics would dominate leading to complete uncertainty and an inability to predict the consequence of any initial situation; we need this to evolve to a state where classical physics leads to the properties of regularity and predictability that allow order to emerge.

The fact that the night sky is dark…is a consequence of the expansion of the universe together with the photon (light particle) to baryon (mass particle) ratio. This feature is a necessary condition for the existence of life: the biosphere on Earth functions by disposing of waste energy to the heat sink of the dark night sky. Thus one way of explaining why the sky is observed to be dark at night is that if this were not so, we would not be here to observe it.

Physical conditions on planets must be in a quasi-equilibrium state for long enough to allow the delicate balances that enable our existence, through the very slow process of evolution, to be fulfilled.”

There are a number of other constraints, limited values for forces—gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear, strong nuclear—and fundamental constants, including that for particle masses and number of particles that are needed for life to evolve. In summary, Ellis puts the Anthropic Principle as the following:

“Life is possible because both the laws of physics and the boundary conditions for the universe have a very special nature. Only particular laws of physics, and particular initial conditions in the Universe, allow the existence of intelligent life of the kind we know. No evolutionary process whatever is possible for any kind of life if these laws and conditions do not have this restricted form.”

1.3 THE INTERPRETATION OF ROBERT KOONS

Robert Koons, a philosophy professor at the University of Texas, summarizes some general objections to invoking the Anthropic Principle for carbon-based life

1. The problem of “old evidence”;

2. Laws of nature don’t need to be explained;

3. We had to be here in any event (see Penrose’s quote above);

4. Exotic life might exist;

5. The Copernican Principle–rejection of anthropocentricity is fundamental to science;

6. We’re only one among many universes (see below).

Objection 1 can be countered by the argument that such evidence is used frequently in science when direct experiments can’t be done–witness the General Relativity explanation of the advance in the perihelion of Mercury.

Objection 2 would do away with all interpretations of theory, quantum mechanics, and the philosophy of science.

Objection 3 is countered as in Thomas Nagel’s quote above; we are an information-seeking life form that needs explanations.

Objection 4 is invalid – we’re talking about conditions for carbon-based life; science-fiction can explore and has explored conditions for exotic life.

Objection 5 – the Anthropic Principle was introduced to rebut the Copernican Principle

.Objection 6 – the multiverse proposition is not itself proven.

Here’s why a multiverse is invoked by atheistic cosmologists: if infinitely many universes with potentially different physical laws and constants exist, then it is not unlikely that in all these, one universe with appropriate conditions for life would be present. The analogy is like that of having a lottery ticket with the numbers 11111 be the winner. That combination of numbers looks improbable, but since there are a whole host of numbers from 00000 to 99999, it is no less probable than any other number. Accordingly the notion of special Creation, consistent with the anthropic coincidences, is not necessary and one piece of evidence for a Creating God is done away with.

This argument leads us to the next Sections: the evidence for the anthropic principle; is there a probability to our universe? I put this evidence, the so-called “Anthropic Coincidences” into categories corresponding to types of of science. This sorting is to some extent arbitrary; cosmology, particle physics, chemistry, molecular biology are interdependent, linked together by fundamental theory.

SECTION 2: Our “Goldilocks Universe” — The “Just Right” Anthropic Coincidences of Cosmology

2.1 CAUTIONARY THOUGHTS

Let me emphasize again that citing these anthropic “coincidences” separately does not mean they are independent. One should not imagine, for example, that God picked out a value for the excited energy level of carbon-12 nuclei tp enable carbon-12 syntheses, and then, in a separate action, picked out laws for electromagnetic and gravitational forces to enable star formation. All the events covered by the term “anthropic coincidence” are jigsaw puzzle pieces in one big picture, a “TOE,” Theory of Everything, crafted by God, the Grand Designer. Accordingly, it is a serious error to attempt to assign separate probabilities to individual coincidences and then multiply them together to get an overall probability for the universe (but see below, SECTION 4, “Is there a Probability for the Universe?”). Finally, the items listed below are by no means the only anthropic coincidences; they are selected as important representative examples.

2.2 “JUST RIGHT” COSMOLOGY — THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE

Here are general features of our universe that enable carbon-based life to exist, taken from Chapter 15 of “Modern Physics and Ancient Faith,” by Prof. Stephen Barr and from “Faith, Science and Understanding” by Rev. Dr. John Polkinghorne, FRS:

Spacetime dimensions compatible with carbon-based life. (by Max Tegmark) - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

Spacetime Dimensionality must be 4 (3 space, 1 time). See the illustration at the left. The “unpredictable” regions have to do with force laws — gravity, electromagnetism–having a different form and thereby unstable planetary orbits. The “too simple” have to do with problems of connectivity: for example two lines will always intersect in space dimensions less than three — you can’t have one line (e.g. a nerve or blood vessel) go over another line.

Expansion of the Early Universe. The early universe expanded at just the right rate; if it had expanded faster, then matter would have been too sparse to come together to form stars and galaxies; if it had expanded slower, matter would have been too dense, and the universe would have contracted in a “crunch.” (See below about “Flat Spacetime,” and ESSAY 2, Section 2.6, “The Flatness Problem.”)

Flat Spacetime and the Density Parameter, Ω. The theory of General Relativity predicts that matter/energy yields a curvature in space-time. This curvature can be positive (as in a sphere), zero (as in a flat plane, a table top), or negative (as in a saddle). The amount of curvature depend on the density of matter and energy (see here and Science Background, Section 3 for a detailed explanation), This density is given as a relative quantity, Ω, the ratio of the actual density to a “critical density”—the density for which spacetime is flat. Accordingly, for a flat spacetime. Ω = 1 exactly. Measurements of fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) give clues about which curvature exists, as shown by the illustration below.

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (from WMAP) for different spacetime curvatures. - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

The inferred value of Ω from WMAP CMBR measurements is 1.02 +/- 0.02, corresponding to a flat spacetime, as near as can be measured.

The Cosmological Constant, Λ. As stated above, the expansion of the universe depends on the density of matter and energy; the matter consists of matter that can be detected experimentally and so-called “dark matter. A major contribution to the total density (almost 70%) is dark energy, energy that does not radiate. This dark energy is characterized by the parameter Λ (Greek upper case “lambda”), “The Cosmological Constant.”

Einstein introduced Λ as a fudge factor in his paper on general relativity: he needed this parameter to yield a static, time-independent, stable universe as a solution to the general relativity equations, rather than one that would expand or contract. Later he said that this was his biggest scientific mistake. But even this mistake has turned golden. As stated above, Λ is now referred to as the “Cosmological Constant,” which quantifies the mysterious “dark energy” that is responsible for most of the expansion of the universe, a fudge factor if you will, but one of enormous significance.

The Expanding Universe. I hope that the reader will see that the features discussed above —the expansion rate of the universe, the density parameter, Ω, and the cosmological constant, Λ — are inter-related, connected together. One should also note that in the history of the universe expansion, the major sources for the expansion was different at different times:

“The previous history of the big bang is viewed as being at first radiation dominated, then matter dominated, and now having passed into the era where dark energy is the dominant influence.” — Carl Nave, hyperphysics, dark matter.

The Age of the Universe. Carbon based life, as we know it would not have existed in a universe only a few billions years old. Why? First, no carbon; it took time for the heavier elements, carbon and beyond, to be formed in the interiors of giant stars and then scattered through the universe by the explosion of stars turned nova and supernova. Second, there would not have been time for life to have evolved into its present state in only a billion years or so.

SECTION 3: The “Just Right” Physics Forces

3.1 THE “JUST RIGHT” WEAK NUCLEAR FORCE

The weak nuclear force is one of the four fundamental forces of nature, electromagnetism, gravity, and the strong nuclear force are the other three. The weak nuclear force is that which plays a role in beta decay, the decay of a neutron to form a protons, an electron, and a neutrino. See the illustration below. Although the adjective “weak” is applied, the weak nuclear force is stronger than gravitation; it is a very short-range force.

beta decay: a neutron (n) in a radioactive nucleus decays to form a proton (p), an electron (e-) and an antineutrino (v) - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

The weak force is important in determining the amount of protons and neutrons present in the universe. If it were too strong there would not be the right ratio of protons and neutrons for helium fusion, the slow-burning fuel in stars; the nuclear fusion process would have gone on to end in iron nuclei; stars would have burnt out too quickly for life to have evolved.

The weak force is also important in enabling the formation of supernovas. The periodic table is formed in the interior of giant stars and then spread through the universe when the star explodes in a supernova. If this process had not occurred then life as we know it, with carbon and alll the other elements, could not have existed.

3.2 THE “JUST RIGHT” STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE.

The “strong” nucler force is the force that holds protons and neutrons together to form nuclei of the elements in the universe. Were this force slightly less, only protons would exist; were it slightly greater, no protons, only lifeless heavy elements (and a big crunch?)

3.3 THE “JUST RIGHT” CARBON-12 NUCLEAR ENERGY — THE TRIPLE ALPHA PROCESS.

The element Carbon has two stable nuclei: carbon-12, consisting of 6 neutrons and 6 protons; carbon-13, consisting of 7 neutrons and 6 protons. (The number of protons in the nucleus gives the number of electrons in the neutral atom, which thus determines the chemical properties of the element.) Carbon-11 nucleus is unstable (carbon-11 could be formed from a collision with a stable lithium-7 nucleus and an alpha particle — helium-4 nucleus, 2 neutrons, 2 protons). A Carbon-12 nucleus could in principle be formed from a collision between a beryllium-8 nucleus (4 neutrons, 4 protons) and an alpha particle, but beryllium-8 is unstable; there wouldn’t be enough of it around to yield carbon-12.

What’s the solution? A triple collision (of sorts) between three alpha particles, whence the term “Three Alpha Process.” This “collision” isn’t one where all three alpha particles collide at once; rather, two collide forming a very short-lived beryllium-8 nucleus, which collides with an alpha particle. Ordinarily only a very small fraction of such quasi-triple collisions would yield carbon-12 nuclei.

What might be done to increase the yield of carbon-12? Fred Hoyle predicted that there would be a higher energy state, an energy that had the same value as the lowest energy (“ground”) of a beryllium-8 nucleus, or more exactly, of two alpha particles. That these energies are the same gives rise to a quantum mechanical “resonance” effect, where the two alpha particle nuclei can easily tunnel over to the excited, higher energy state of the carbon-12 nucleus. (The term resonance comes from a musical analogy: if you hit a tuning fork tuned at 440 vibrations /sec it will excite a sound in a hollow pipe or a string tuned to that same frequency.) Fred Hoyle’s prediction of the carbon-12 nuclear energy,”the Hoyle state,” required to account for the presence of carbon-12 in the universe (and the heavier elements derived from carbon-12) was confirmed experimentally by Caltech physicists.

3.4 THE “JUST RIGHT” RATIO OF ELECTRICAL AND GRAVITATIONAL FORCES.

Electrical and gravitational forces follow an “inverse square law,” which is to say that the force varies inversely as the square of the distance: if you double the distance between two interacting bodies, the force between them would become 1/4 as great. This law (and the finely tuned values of appropriate fundamental constants) enables a balance between electrical and gravitational forces¹ such that atoms could be formed in the early universe and thence stars and galaxies.² If the gravitational force/electrical force ratio had been slightly greater, no elements or atoms would have been formed and the universe would have contracted in a “Big Crunch;” if this ratio had been slightly less, no stars could have formed because of electrical repulsion between protons.

SECTION 4: “Just Right” Planetary and Geological Conditions

4.1 “JUST RIGHT’ PLANETARY AND GEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS IF THE UNIVERSE IS LARGE/OLD ENOUGH.

There are about two trillion galaxies in the observable universe. Each galaxy contains 100 to 300 billion stars. Accordingly, if there is variation in the kinds of galaxies, the kinds of stars (and there is), then appropriate conditions to sustain life should be found somewhere, even if the probability for these conditions is small. That such conditions exist is then not in itself remarkable, unlike the cosmological and physics conditions mentioned above and the chemical and biochemical ones below. Nevertheless, I’ll mention some of them just to keep the catalog more or less complete.

4.2 “JUST RIGHT” GOLDILOCKS ZONES FOR PLANETARY SYSTEMS

Our Solar System’s (Earth’s) Location in Our Galaxy in an Outer Arm (the Orion Spur) - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

Besides heat and light, stars emit “hard” radiation, ultra-violet, x-rays and gamma rays. This hard radiation can break the chemical bonds in molecules; accordingly, if there were much such radiation the chemistry necessary for life could not take place. Earth is shielded from this hard radiation from the sun by its atmosphere, including the ozone layer. Were there lots of other stars near the earth the atmosphere would not be able to handle the extra radiation and life could not exist. Thus the goldilocks zone for planetary systems is not near the center of a galaxy, where stars are packed closely together, but out near the arms, where there’s lots of acreage between stars. The likely locations for life friendly planetary systems has been simulated by physicists at St. Andrew’s University.

One other point should be noted. In multiple star systems with stars that are close together, the orbit of a planet for such a system would be highly eccentric, like that of a comet. Such an orbit would not be suitable temperature-wise for life: part of it would be too cold, part too hot (see below).

4.3 “JUST RIGHT” GOLDILOCKS ZONES FOR PLANETS”

Different Habitable Zones (Goldilocks Zones) by Sonny Harman (PSU) - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

In order for life based on carbon chemistry to exist, there are conditions on its habitat. First, for chemical reactions to occur at a reasonable rate and for biological molecules to be stable, the temperature of the environment has to lie within a relatively narrow range. (Think of life on earth: it exists in the Antarctic and on the Death Valley desert, but that temperature range is still narrow in the cosmic scheme of things.) This required temperature imposes, in turn, a condition on the orbit of planets that might contain life: if the planet circles a relatively cold red dwarf, it will have to be much closer to that star than would a planet circling a hot blue giant.

A number of planets have been detected (not observed directly) by their gravitational effect on the star they orbit and by their effect on the star’s radiation as they pass across it. An extensive list of these is given here. Most of those listed are less than 50 light years away from our solar system. A few, detected by the Kepler space telescope, are several thousand light years distant. A diagram showing how this varies with type of star and distance from the star has been compiled by Sonny Harman (PSU) — see illustration above.

As noted below, much more is required for a life-friendly environment than a Goldilocks zone orbit for a planet.

4.4 EARTH’S “JUST RIGHT” UNUSUALLY LARGE MOON

Large planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune) have large moons; small planets (Mars, Pluto) have small moons or none (Venus, Mercury). How the earth acquired its large moon is still something of a scientific mystery. But whatever the cause, our moon serves several purposes friendly for chemistry and life. It is a semi-shield, diverting meteors and larger bodies from the earth; it produces tides that moderate climate change. It alters the earth’s orbit and polar inclination in a life-friendly way. Whether these purported effects are essential or just icing-on-the-cake of anthropic coincidences is a matter for debate, a debate in which I don’t choose to engage.

4.5 “JUST RIGHT” PROPERTIES OF WATER FOR OUR EARTH.

Hydrogen Bonds in H2O d+, d- represent small electrical charge on H and O atoms, resp. - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

There is a link between the physical properties of water and the planetary characteristics of earth — the tilt of its axis, the period of rotation,… — that give climactic conditions favorable to life. I’ve discussed these in a post, “The Theology of Water,” which I’ll summarize here. (More anthropic properties of water are discussed below in the context of chemistry and biochemistry.) These “just right” properties of water stem from one bit of chemistry, the hydrogen bond between hydrogen atoms on one water molecule and oxygen atoms on another, as shown in the illustration on the right The hydrogen bond is discussed in greater detail below, but the point to emphasize here is that it’s a “just right” connection, not too strong and not too weak, a zipper, not glue or a na:

liquid water has a maximum density at 4 degrees. If it didn’t (if the maximum density was at the freezing temperature), the cold water would sink to the bottom of the ocean and earth’s average surface temperature would be more than 20 degrees lower;

if the vapor pressure or the unusually high heat of vaporization of water is changed, either too much or not enough cloud would exist, which, in either case, would be a meteorological disaster;

if the density of ice is greater than that of liquid water at the freezing point (for most substances the density of the solid is greater than that of the melt), the ice would sink to the bottom of the oceans and the oceans would be perpetually frozen at the bottom, leading to massive winds at the surface;

if the high specific heat of liquid water is reduced, the temperature stabilizing effect of the ocean is lowered, and more storms and lower average temperature results;

the properties of water are optimized for the tilt of the earth’s axis (23.5 degrees from the vertical)–if it were 0 degrees tilt, the temperature stabilizing effect would be too large, with complete cloud cover and ice-caps down to 40 degrees latitude

The tilt of the earth’s axis is responsible for seasons. When the polar regions are pointed to the sun during the polar summer, they become warmer so clouds tend to dissipate. Were there no tilt of the earth’s axis and no polar summer, the polar regions and below would remain cool, and clouds would accumulate. Thus these regions would be further shielded from solar heat and would become colder still. There is a feedback principle involved.

SECTION 5: “JUST RIGHT’ CHEMISTRY—HOORAY FOR GOD’S PERIODIC TABLE!

Periodic Table of the Elements superposed on the Crab Nebula (from a Supernova). - From Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

5.1 WHAT IS LIFE?

That’s a question that philosophers and scientists have been arguing about for ages. It’s also a question we should address before discussing what is required of chemistry, that life be enabled. So, here goes, a short list of just a few essential properties of living things:

Metabolism: living things takes matter and energy from the environment to sustain themselves;

Reproduction: living things beget, asexually or sexually, to yield descendants;

Growth: living things change form during their existence.

5.2 THE “JUST RIGHT” PROPERTIES OF CHEMISTRY.

Before proceeding further, I want to acknowledge that this will be a very sketchy discussion. To be complete a book or two on biochemistry, molecular biology and physiology would be needed. A more complete exposition of the chemistry and biochemistry background is given in the “Science Background” section of this Web-book. In this Essay I focus on hydrogen-bonding, that weak bonding is an essential property of water and biologically important molecules.

Here are two very general chemical properties that are required to enable living things that metabolize, reproduce, and grow:

Complexity, to enable living things to carry out many different biological functions; to transmit information within the organism and to descendants;

“Just Right” Chemical Stability. If biologically important molecules are too stable, metabolism and reproduction will be impossible — species will be inert and necessary chemical reactions won’t occur; if molecules are too reactive, then they won’t be in existence long enough to carry out required chemical functions

5.3 THE “JUST RIGHT” SOLVENT, WATER.

“The water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of living water, welling up into eternal life. This is a new kind of water, a living, leaping water, welling up for those who are worthy. But why did Christ call the grace of the Spirit water? Because all things are dependent on water; plants and animals have their origin in water. Water comes down from heaven as rain, and although it is always the same in itself, it produces many different effects, one in the palm tree, another in the vine, and so on throughout the whole of creation. It does not come down, now as one thing, now as another, but while remaining essentially the same, it adapts itself to the needs of every creature that receives it.”

Quoted in the “Office of Readings” (Monday, Week 7 of Easter),from a catechetical instruction by St. Cyril of Jerusalem.

Water is called the “universal solvent” because it dissolves many kinds of molecules, enabling a variety of chemical reactions to occur. One property of water that aids solubility is hydrogen bonding, discussed below. Another is the ability to form loosely bound complexes of water with the components of salts, positive and negative ions, as shown in the illustration below for dissolving salt, NaCl:

Sodium Chloride (NaCl, salt) dissolving in water (H2O); yellow balls represent Na+ ions with unit positive charge; green balls, Cl- ions with unit negative charge; blue spheres, Hydrogen (H) in H2O; red spheres, oxygen (O) in H2O. Note the small positive charge, d+ on the H atoms in H2O and the small negative charge, d- , on the O atoms. from Wiklmedia Commons. (Caption for linked image)

In the diagram above the slightly negative charged oxygen part of H2O is attracted to the positively charged sodium ion, Na+; the slightly positively charged hydrogen part of H2O is attracted to the negatively charged chloride ion, Cl-. Loosely bound complexes of Na+ ion and water molecules and Cl- ion and water molecules are formed to be in solution. The illustration is diagrammatic; sizes of ions and atoms are not to scale. The same type of solvation process applies for many other salts, compounds of potassium, calcium and other metal ions that have roles in biochemistry.

5.4 THE “JUST RIGHT” BOND STRENGTH OF THE HYDROGEN BOND: A ZIPPER, NOT GLUE

It has been recognized that hydrogen bonds restrain protein molecules to their native configurations, and I believe that as the methods of structural chemistry are further applied to physiological problems it will be found that the significance of the hydrogen bond for physiology is greater than that of any other single structural feature. – Linus Pauling, “The Nature of the Chemical Bond”

Let’s imagine God thinking about how He will design nature:

“Now I want chemistry to have not only strong interactions between atoms, but also gentle ones: so that complicated structures can unfold and rewind easily, and so that big and small molecules can come together and join for reactions and go apart readily – Velcro or a zipper, not glue or nails. What should I use? I have it–a hydrogen bond.”

(Note: please don’t criticize me for heresy here – I’m using a semi-literary device to make a point. I know God holds an infinite number of thoughts and plans simultaneously in His infinite mind.)

Here’s the basic idea: H (hydrogen) bonded to O (oxygen) as in H-O-H (water) shows a slight positive electrical charge; :O, oxygen, with a pair of unbonded (lone) electrons (the two dots in front of the O), shows a slight negative charge. Similarly, :N (nitrogen), with a pair of lone electrons, shows a slight negative charge, and N-H, hydrogen bonded to nitrogen, show a slight positive charge. There is an electrical attraction between these small positive and negative charges; there is also, as nmr experiments have recently shown, a contribution from chemical bonding (sharing of electrons) to hydrogen bonding, so that it is more than simple electrostatic interaction.

In the figure below are shown the types of hydrogen bonds important in molecules of biological interest.

The single dashes represent single bonds; (Caption for linked image)

The = signs, double bonds;

The – – -, hydrogen bonds;

The ” : “, lone pair electrons;

Superscripts, delta plus and delta minus, represent small net positive and negative charges.

Hydrogen bonds energies are about 1/20 to 1/30 the value of ordinary covalent bonds, so the hydrogen bonds can be broken much more easily than covalent bonds; for example the O-H bond energy is about 430 kJoules/mole, whereas the O-H – – – :O hydrogen bond energy is 21 kJoules / mole.

I’ll summarize the role hydrogen bonds play in biochemistry and molecular biology below. A more extended lesson on basic chemistry is given in the “Science Background” section.

5.5 “JUST RIGHT” BUILDING BLOCKS FOR PROTEINS, AMINO ACIDS

Amino Acid Structure; Peptide Formation (Two Amino Acids Combine) with Release of a H2O Molecule. - From Wikipedia. (Caption for linked image)

There are 20 amino acids that are the building blocks for proteins. Each amino acid molecule has a COOH, acidic carboxyl group (releases protons in solution), a NH2, basic amine group (accepts protons from solution) attached to a central carbon. Also attached to that group are 20 other different chemical parts, symbolized by “R”, as in the diagram at the right.

The 20 amino acids that combine to build proteins are shown here. Proteins perform several essential functions:

catalysis, to speed up biochemical reactions (as enzymes);

transport of smaller species through the organism and through cells (for example, hemoglobin transporting oxygen);

building material for tissue;

engines to move tissue and muscle.

anti-bodies to remove unwanted and dangerous stuff

In all these functions parts of the proteins bind loosely to other parts of the protein and thus form appropriate structures that are essential to their function. This is shown very nicely in the TED YouTube video below, by Professor Ken Dill (SUNY/Stony Brook).

https://youtu.be/zm-3kovWpNQ or link below

Professor Ken Dill

Another nice YouTube video showing protein flexibility is here. I should emphasize again that the flexibility and ability to form different structures is enabled by hydrogen bonds, bonds that can be zipped and unzipped readily, not glued or nailed. The diagram below illustrates how protein structures change when they act as a catalyst, that is as an enzyme:

https://youtu.be/yZ2aY5lxEGE or link below

Protein Flexibility

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ2aY5lxEGE&feature=youtu.be

https://youtu.be/yZ2aY5lxEGE

Diagram illustrating how protein structure changes to facilitate chemical reactions. - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

5.6 “JUST RIGHT” HYDROGEN BONDING FOR BASE PAIRING IN DNA

Base pairing (diagrammatically) in DNA; letters stand for the bases shown below. - from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

Watson (or was it Crick?) in a moment of insight noticed that the bases (nitrogen containing molecules bound to sugar pieces in nucleotides such as DNA, RNA) matched each other by hydrogen bonding like pieces in a jig-saw puzzle. They could thus stabilize a helical structure, by links across the spiral, as shown in the figure at the right..

There are four bases, adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), thymine (T), organic compounds containing a nitrogen or amine group that can take on proteins. Hydrogen bonds are formed to link the members of a pair, as shown below.

These bases are attached to sugar-type pieces, which in turn have phosphate groups on them that form the links between base units. The hydrogen bonds linking base pairs are strong enough to hold together the two DNA strands in the spiral helix, but weak enough that they can be “unzipped” by mild chemical action, an enzyme RNA polymerase, which yields messenger RNA.

Base Pairs: (Caption for linked image)

Guanine (G) with Cytosine (C);

Adenine (A) with Thymine (T);

from Wikimedia Commons

5.7 ALPHABET BLOCKS TO CODE FOR BUILDING PROTEINS

Before discussing the mechanism by which DNA enables protein synthesis, a few remarks are in order about the bases as letters in a word, words which encode which amino acids are used as building blocks in the protein. In this process a linear combination of three bases is used to encode which amino acid is put into a protein. So we can regard the bases as letters and the combination of three bases as a three letter word; the three letter word is called a “codon“. There are four bases* so there are 4^3 = 64 possible codons. There are 20 amino acids found in proteins, plus codons for beginning and ending protein synthesis, so that several codons may encode for incorporating the same amino acid, i.e. there is a redundancy. See here and here for tables showing specific codon / amino acid relations.

5.8 GENE EXPRESSION–TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSLATION

I’ll give just a brief summary here of gene expression–transcription and translation. More detailed accounts are given in the linked web sites and videos.

STEP 1: transcription – RNA polymerase unzips the double strand and attaches complementary bases to single strand RNA. See here and here. Note that the RNA polymerase is a large protein, much bigger than the DNA strand. Also note that one strand of the DNA serves as a “template”–bases complementary to bases in the template strand are linked, e.g. G to C, C to G, A to T, U to A, and as they’re linked they detach to yield mRNA (messenger RNA). See the flash animation for a more detailed description of this process. PLEASE SEE THE LINKED ANIMATIONS – They will be well worth your while.

STEP 2: translation--mRNA leaves the cell nucleus, goes into the cytoplasmwhere it attaches to a ribosome, where protein synthesis occurs. In the process transfer RNA molecules are sent by the ribosome to attach specific amino acids, coded by the m-RNA, to form a protein.

5.7 COMMENTARY

The description above is necessarily concise–a lot is left out and I urge the reader to look at the recommended links, animations and explanations and to explore this fascinating subject. Summarizing gene expression in one paragraph is much like trying to do that for the Bible, Old and New Testaments.

What amazes me is that molecular biologists and those who deal with gene expression, and all the other wonders of molecular biology don’t paraphrase Psalm 19A: “DNA declares the glory of God, and gene expression shows forth the work of His hands..”. Certainly the hydrogen bond, which is a crucial element in these processes, neither too weak nor too strong, is a marvel in itself.

God’s providence in molecular biology is as marvelous as it is in physics.

SECTION 6: Is there a Probability for the Universe?

“But is it probable that probability brings certainty?” — Blaise Pascal, Pensees 496

6.1 THE 10,000 DIALS, 10,000 MONKEYS ANALOGY —

Can 50,000 monkeys typing randomly at a typewriter eventually produce Hamlet? - image from Wikimedia Commons (Caption for linked image)

As the account above of the anthropic coincidences should suggest, the presence of organic life in the universe (namely us) requires a series of unlikely happenings and restricted values for physical laws and constants. This “fine-tuning” (as it’s been called) has been likened to a room full of 10,000 dials, each of which has to be set to a precise setting in order to achieve action; 10,000 monkeys are let into the room and each adjusts a dial and, lo, action occurs.

For example, theoretical calculations have shown that if the strong nuclear force were 2 % higher or 2 % lower, then the elements as we know them would not have been formed. This does not mean that the probability of having the strong nuclear force at an anthropic value is 4%. In order to give a probability for this range, much more would have to be known about how the physics of the strong nuclear force.

6.2 ERRORS IN PROBABILITY ARGUMENTS

A major objection to using such probability arguments, as Ellis points out above, is that the universe is a single datum — probability arguments are generally applied to samples from larger collections for which we have information about variability. For example, if you’ve examined 20,000 crates of oranges and found 100 crates containing bad oranges, you’d be justified in putting a probability of 100/20,000 or .005 in finding a bad orange in the next crate. But if you’ve only come across one crate of oranges, then it’s speculation to put a probability on finding a bad orange.

Another error in probability arguments for the anthropic principle is to list a string of fine tuning examples (call them a,b,c,d…x), and then use the argument that P(a,b,c,d…x) = P(a) P(b) P(c)P(d)…P(x). This would say that the probability of the total set is the product of the probabilities for each member of the set. If the individual events were independent, in other words if what happened for one event did not depend on what happened for another, this argument would be correct. However, such independence will not necessarily hold. Consider, for example, the properties of water that are life friendly:

Thermodynamic — high freezing and boiling points, high specific heat, etc.;

Physical — surface tension, low specific gravity of ice, maximum density of liquid water at 4 deg C.

These properties all depend on the very unusual capacity of protons in a H2O molecule to form strong hydrogen bonds to oxygen atoms in other H2O molecules. That hydrogen bonding capability arises from quantum mechanics and the physical nature of electrostatic attraction. So it is one feature, not many, for which a probability should entered. Now, how do you assess the probability of quantum mechanics bringing about hydrogen-bonding?

Moreover, there is a difficulty in using probability in an after-the-fact, rather than a predictive sense. The way to use probabilities in assessing the anthropic coincidences is by Bayesian probability techniques, with well-defined prior assumptions, and to use the resulting Bayesian probability as a measure of belief. Such a procedure is discussed in one of my blog posts, “Is there a Probability for the Universe?”

NOTES

¹This ratio is a very small number: about 1/10^36. Yes, that is 10 to the 36th power!

²Related to the requirement for 3 space dimensions and one time dimension, is the following: if there had been four space dimensions, then Gauss’s Divergence Theorem would require inverse cube laws for gravitational and electrical forces, and motions under these would be very unstable.

From a series of articles written by: Bob Kurland - a Catholic Scientist

#catholic physics

0 notes

blindsite-blog · 8 years ago

Text

Visualization and coaching

In this paper I’m going to go over something around visualization in Physics point of view and then I will connect it to coaching and how beneficial is using it in a coaching session. When and utilizing it and; finally I will point out a typical visualization technique with related questions.

How visualization helps healers

Visualization is an ability which has been found in various countries and systems enabling access to the past and mostly future events. Lots of books have been written about visualization and variety of its techniques.

In 2006 film the Secret, they recommend to visualize just what you want to achieve it.

Its benefit in addition has shown in some healing systems, the healer asks patient to visualize the injured part of human anatomy because it is sound and perfect. Many people have reported healing by use of visualization.

Nowadays this idea that our thoughts create our destiny is nevertheless in people’s minds.

Louis.L.Hay in her book “you can heal your life” claims that she could heal her cancer just by some visualization techniques and then she ran several workshops teaching how to heal by visualization and also Jean Houston has presented variety of visualization practices in her book “The Possible Human” recommending the same idea.

Brain Hemispheres

Before saying anything about visualization let’s begin with what’s happening in our brain. The forebrain is made of two hemispheres, left and right.

The hemispheres are almost identical in shape, yet they function differently.

The inputs from our right sensory organs are usually used in the left hemisphere and vice versa.

The 2 hemispheres have their particular functionality; in Physics’ realm each one covers one part of Physics defined reality. The Classical and Quantum level of reality.

In 1981, Roger W. Sperry, in his noble lecture declared,” Left and Right hemispheres are characterized by inbuilt, qualitatively different and mutually antagonistic modes of cognitive processing, the left being basically analytic and sequential, the right spatial and synthetic.

A rational was added for evolution of cerebral asymmetry based on the functional features of obtaining the two cognitive modes develop in separate hemisphere in order to minimize mutual interference.”

The functionality of two hemispheres is so that within the same individual we may see different mental strategy based on be worked hemisphere.

We usually distinguish the hemisphere by the traits they are linked to-the head versus the heart.

For the majority of people, the left hemisphere is trained to be analytical; the information received from the various sense organs are gathered and assembled to reach at a basic idea and the analyzed to draw an in depth picture comprising the different components.

Time is something associated with the left hemisphere the left side of the mind gathers the information and arranges it in timely succession. That is exactly how we sense the past, the present and the future.

Since the successive accumulation of memories produces the notion time for us, time has a trajectory that runs from days gone by to the future and not the other way around.

As such, it mimics time as understood in classical Physics. On the other hand, time in quantum mechanics may be symmetric and flows in both direction.

Language ability mainly originates in the left hemisphere. Speaking involves isolating sounds and forming specific words. This is in accordance with the classical degree of reality, where components are isolated and separated.

At the quantum level, everything is entangled and may be treated as one.

In order to describe the information it receives, the left hemisphere dissects the incoming data into words and probes their definitions individually and within the context of a sentence.

“Making sense “, implies that a huge number of information is eradicated during the entire process of speaking. Similarly, data is rigorously reduced even as we come from the infinite information at quantum level, which is related to quantum uncertainties and super place of states, to a focused and just one single, certain and logical state noticed in classical level of reality.

It appears that the left brain receives the incoming data from sense organs, then by conditioning and examining, the left hemisphere creates a simpler, more comprehensible and dependable objective world.

The right hemisphere focuses primarily on tasks that are nonverbal, nonmathematical and non-sequential in nature.

Its function is mainly imaginative, time does not exist in its domain and everything is sensed as happening within the present. The now is expanded forever.

The right brain hears the sounds and sees the world. However the sounds are not separated. Unlike to left brain, which deals with the quantitative measures of dialogue, the right brain is in charge of comprehending the definitions of people’s expressions.

It senses the emotions that accompany the conversation, maybe not the patient wordings. It deals with all the quality of communication.

The right mind is spontaneous, care free and imaginative. Permits our artistic juices to flow free without inhibition or judgment. Dreams belong to right hemisphere and are mostly clear of the left hemisphere.

Non-locating is a feature of goals, the right mind is free to envisage all of the probabilities and possibilities.

clash of clans free gems One may postulate that the right brain reveals the quantum mechanical level of reality without interfering, interpreting or manipulating the gotten wave stimuli.

Wave-Particle Duality

In 1704 Newton described matter as solid, massy, hard and impenetrable. In the late 1800s, James Clerk Maxwell claimed that light is the propagation of electromagnetic wave, his claim was verified by Heinrich Hertz in 1887.Einstein speculated that light is a stream of compact lumps,” Photons”. Photons would be created when electrons emit light and would vanish when light is absorbed. Seeking evidence for his speculation he found “Photoelectric effect” that were known for twenty years and he explained it with taking light granularity aspect. Einstein said it in 1905:

In line with the presently proposed assumption the energy in a beam of light emanating from a point source is not distributed constantly over bigger volumes of space but consists of a finite quantity of energy quanta, localized at points of space which move without subdividing and which are absorbed and emitted only as units.

Compton had, in 1923, nearly 2 decades after Einstein proposed the photon, discovered, to his surprise, that when light bounced off electrons its frequency changed. This might be not wave behavior: When a wave reflects from a stationary object, each incident crest creates one other wave crest. The frequency of the wave therefore doesn’t change in reflection. On the other hand it was another proof of light granularity.

Graduate student de Broglie shared Einstein’s feeling that there was clearly a deep meaning to light’s duality, being either a spread-out wave or a blast of compact particles. He wondered whether there could be symmetry in Nature. If light had been either wave or particle, perhaps matter was also either particle or wave.

There had been a minor accident in the laboratories of the Telephone Company in New York. Clinton Davison had been experimenting with all the scattering of electrons from the metal surfaces. While Davison’s interests were mainly scientific, the phone company was developing vacuum cleaner tube amplifiers for telephone transmissions, and for that the behavior of electrons striking metal was crucial.

Electrons usually bounced down a rough metal to drive down the oxygen. The nickel crystallized, essentially forming an array of slits. Electrons now bounced off in only a few well-defined directions. It was an interference pattern demonstrating the electron’s wave nature. The breakthrough confirmed de Broglie’s speculations that material objects could also be waves. Physicists in 1923 finally forced to accept a wave-particle duality: A photon, an electron, an atom, a molecule- in principle any object- can be either compact or widely spread-out. You can choose which of these two contradictory features to demonstrate. The real reality of an object depends upon how you elect to look at it.

Physics had encountered consciousness but didn’t yet realize it. Within the most of everyday experiences, we perceive just the solid characteristics of matters. We see a ball as a solid, localized, and tangible object that is topic to external forces. How come we not sense a ball as a wave? The fading wave characteristic of matter is known as wave function collapse. In this phenomenon, the spread out and multi state wave is paid down to a local and distinct particle.

In 1932, John von Neumann proposed that the collapse of wave function happens in the consciousness of human beings. In other words, he believed that “objectification” (the work of interpreting incoming data as an object) is an invention of the human mind.

As mentioned above, dualistic wave-particle nature of matter is a great puzzle. We mentioned early in the day that the work of dividing and quantifying is a function of the left mind. If the particle part is only an invention of our left brain, then it is understandable which our brain would project it to your region where the energy is more concentrated it means close to wave’s peak.

Non locality

Ernest Rutherford at the University of Manchester in England explored the atom by shooting alpha particles (helium atoms stripped out their electrons) through a gold foil. The result emphasized that almost all of the atom mass had been focused in a small lump of positive charge, a “nucleus” and electrons orbited it.

The problem with this model had been instability. Bohr the Danish postdoctoral student worked on the security problem. He accepted quantization as fundamental. After all, it had worked for Planck, and it had struggled to obtain Einstein.

He assigned an energy level to each orbit and by fiat forbid an electron to crash into the nucleus. He added that each time an electron jump in a higher orbit in getting back to original orbit emits a photon.

Experiment had shown (as we mentioned earlier) that the observer can change the status of the object.

According to Bohr and Heisenberg, The laws and regulations of nature are neither objective nor deterministic. They don't describe a real possibility that is independent of the observer. You cannot assist but affect the upshot of any observation you make, since the Uncertainty concept (it says we can not measure the exact position and the actual momentum of any particle at the same time) tells us.

Einstein was the initial one who argued this interpretation. Einstein is often quoted as saying, “God doesn’t play dice with all the universe,” Einstein felt that making fate in hands of people had been a gamble.

Though he got together with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen and published the EPR paper making an argument that quantum theory was not complete. EPR argued that because of correlation, one could determine the measurement of the second electron after the first was measured which was in contrary of Uncertainty Principle.

The idea is that one is that one means the scientist can make prediction is by correlating two objects that have interacted by collision. The first object, moving at a consistent momentum collides with a 2nd object; and we know from Newton that the second item will have the exact same reaction as the first to the collision, since momentum is conserved, if we measure the place of the first object, then by correlation we should certainly calculate the position and momentum of the second, which would mean that quantum theory is incomplete- since we had been in a position to determine the momentum and position at exactly the same time.

John Bell, a British physicist, demonstrated that cause and effect have their places in Newtonian reality, but not in the quantum world. In Paris during 1980s, Alain aspect conducted a series of experiments considering Bell’s propositions. He and his team utilized polarization in place of momentum, it could be done more accurately and polarization is conserved within the same way as momentum.

The upshot of his experiments showed that the measuring the polarization of the initial photon affects on the other one. Einstein called the thought of this effect as” spooky action at a distance,” The physicists called it non locality; it’s related to action in distance without signals!!!

So again quantum experiments showed that we create our reality even as we observe it.

Another astounding quality of subatomic entities is they can travel through walls. This seeming impossibility is seen when an alpha particle of nucleus decays. This trend is called tunneling and represents a different type of quantum jump compared to one in which an electron leaps to lower and lower energy levels. The alpha particle is held in part the nucleus by a wall of electric force that is theoretically impassable, according to Newtonian physics. There is a certain small chance that it will pop through, appearing on the other side.” Although the probability is very low, an alpha particle can unexpectedly show up on the surface of the nucleus and travel off, It doesn’t happen often, but passing through walls- unachievable through classical physics and our usual, everyday world- can and does actually occur in the quantum.

our hypothesis around non locality

As the film secret has shown and as the majority of healers claim, when you make an image of that which you want, you'll be able to create the reality you desire.

So that it appears like there’s a correlation between what you imagine and what’s been created, just equivalent as two correlated photons that have been found in Aspect’s experiment.

The consciousness of a human normally exists within the radiant fields, that surrounds the brain and body and it expands and contracts with the beings perception of presence. The being perceives the environment through sensory receptors that convert perceptions into electrochemical impulses and activates the neurons of the mind. Active neurons generate tiny electromagnetic fields, the sum of which adds to the radiant aura. As you can see it would appear that just what you sense from the environmental surroundings, including any changes, creates an image in your thoughts.

What does it look like? If you think of any of the electromagnetic waves in your mind as a particle correlated with a particle outside of the brain, it’s getting much like non locality phenomenon mentioned above.

So clearly you could see that if you create a graphic in your mind you can change your environment, just through spooky action at a distance. So in order to have visualization work we just have to create a definite photo of what we want including the accompanied feelings. As I mentioned earlier all the probabilities can be envisaged simultaneously by the right brain without limitation forced upon us by logical mind, likewise, reality on the quantum mechanical level also exists concurrently in all possible states, without interfering, interpreting, or manipulating the received wave stimuli. The exact same will happen reversely you may possibly have all possible states in your thoughts allow it to be created in the surface.

State Reduction/ Superposition

Exactly like just what Newton did for explaining reality in a classical world, Schrödinger created the wave equation for material objects and despite the classical reality he revealed that everything is made by superposition of probabilities and whenever we observe we choose one of these and that’s why we just see everything in one single state.

From this component of quantum mechanic you may possibly probably find down that our company is as observers are the one who choose what the reality is and it takes place by state reduction.

It sounds like superposition give us the all possibilities and non locality everything is connected.

Would you you know what i am talking about? What you imagine could be without the limitation and impossibilities and it might be directly connected to that which you create in actuality.

How visualization works in coaching

Now, we've got the scientific ideas behind visualization, it’s time to discuss how it works and why do we utilize it in coaching?

In line with the coaching definition it’s a partnership been found to bring up the best from the coachee who is resourceful and knowledgeable enough to solve his/her problem.

Considering this, coach will support the customer being clear on what s/he really wants, what barriers has stopped him/her, what tools/resources s/he needs to reach his/her goal.

In one single hand visualization will help the client to be clear on:

1. The picture of what s/he wants

2. What kinds of obstacles s/he might face

3. Required resources

4. achievement happiness ( which triggers his/her thoughts in coming up with solutions)

In order to make it effective visualization, mentor may ask several questions helping the client use his/her imagination creatively make as clear as possible picture may be thought.

On the other hand as I mentioned earlier it will create client’s own reality based on quantum mechanics rules.

So based on what issue our client has the supporting questions and techniques will be different.

Here are some typical questions:

Have actually the client take a deep breathe and imagine him/her self in the situation of the being faced issue, ask him/her what s/he sees; hears; feels; smells and taste. It’s helpful to get client over there as it sounds real. Then ask him/her about the problem s/he he struggling with to be able to make him/her a definite picture of different perspectives s/he can approach to the issue.

You can find some other questions to have the client make a powerful picture so that you can create his/her own reality.

After having the client gets the safe place in his/her imagination, ask:

Are you seeing this image through your own eyes, or are you seeing yourself within the photo?

Are they moving images? Or perhaps is still image or indeed even a series of slides?

What about the color- is it grayscale?

Is the image a 3-D image?

Is there any clear background?

Is there any sound or conversation associated with the image?

Ask him/her repeat this imagination sometimes to make it completely close to an actual photo.

This assists the client picking out the brighter solutions in addition to creating the desired future.

Conclusion

My researches on visualization have started with its work on patients and healers reports on how useful it's along the way of recovery.

I tried to bring some systematic explanations and as I’d heard several times it doesn’t’ work what does it suggest that one may create your reality-and if it works how do you make use of it in coaching so that it will help your client move forward. I decided to give it simplicity in terms of Physics’ theories showing what’s going on in the brain during imagination and finally make a connection between visualization and coaching.

Future work

Working on this paper really inspired me to work with this interdisciplinary area of science and I’m going to give it more strength based on Physics, Psychology and expert coaching skills.

References:

1. Natalie Reid “5 steps to a Quantum Life”

2. Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner :” Quantum Enigma, Physics encounters consciousness:

3. Dr. Mohsen Kermanshahi “ Quantum Mind”

4. Dr. Dave :” Effective Visualization”

5. : “ Hyperconsciousness”

6. Walters, Patric- Hey, Anthony J. G “The new quantum universe”

7. Maxwell Malts “ Mental image psychology”

8. Stone, Robert B” Man the healer: learn to heal”

0 notes

pamphletstoinspire · 7 years ago

Photo

Catholic Physics - Reflections of a Catholic Scientist - Part 32

Philosophic Issues in Cosmology 6: Are we special?--the Anthropic Coincidences

“Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth - the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist." Paul Davies.

" The argument (the Anthropic Principle) can be used to explain why the conditions happen to be just right for the existence of (intelligent) life on the earth at the present time. For if they were not just right, then we should not have found ourselves to be here now, but somewhere else, at some other appropriate time." Roger Penrose.

"One doesn't show that something doesn't require explanation by pointing out that it is a condition of one's existence. If I ask for an explanation of the fact that the air pressure in the transcontinental jet is close to that at sea level, it is no answer to point out that if it weren't, I'd be dead.” Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos.

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." Fred Hoyle

This is the 6th in a series of posts summarizing an article by George F.R. Ellis on Philosophic Issues in Cosmology.

The 10,000 dials and 10,000 monkeys analogy

The presence of organic life in the universe (namely us) requires a series of unlikely happenings and restricted values for physical laws and constants. This “fine-tuning” (as it's been called) has been likened to a room full of 10,000 dials, each of which has to be set to a precise setting in order to achieve action; 10,000 monkeys are let into the room and each adjusts a dial and, lo, action occurs. The set of coincidences was termed “The Anthropic Principle” by Brandon Carter in 1973, when he introduced it in a conference to oppose the “Copernican Principle”, that man has no special place in the universe.

References

The Anthropic Principle has been discussed extensively in books and articles. There is a concise summary by Robert Koons in his philosophy lectures , giving various interpretations, with arguments for and against each. (I'll summarize some of these below.) A good collection of articles with different (and opposing views) of the Anthropic Principle is given in God and Design (ed. Neil Manson). There are many versions of the Anthropic Principle ranging from the Weak Anthropic Principle, WAP, which tautologically observes that if the universe weren't fit for us to be here we would wouldn't be here discussing the principle (see the Penrose quote above), through the Strong Anthropic Principle, SAP, that the universe has been fine-tuned for intelligent life (us), on up to the Completely Ridiculous Anthropic Principle (by Martin Gardner—you complete the acronym).

Can unlikelihood be quantified?

In assessing the improbable nature of the anthropic coincidences, some authors assign a specific probability to the value of some particular physical constant. Such assignment is not always justified, because probability considerations are ill defined, in the usual sense of evidential probability. For example, theoretical calculations have shown that if the strong nuclear force were 2 % higher or 2 % lower, then the elements as we know them would not have been formed. This does not mean that the probability of having the strong nuclear force at an anthropic value is 4%. In order to give a probability for this range, the population distribution of the parameters for the strong nuclear force would have to be known. Moreover, there is a difficulty in using probability in an after-the-fact, rather than a predictive sense. The way to use probabilities in assessing the anthropic coincidences is via Bayesian probability techniques, with well-defined prior assumptions, and to use the resulting Bayesian probability as a measure of belief.

Ellis's interpretation

Ellis, in his presentation of the anthropic coincidences, focuses on the special nature of physical laws that allow for the presence of life, rather than on their improbability:

“One of the most profound issues in cosmology is the Anthropic question...why does the Universe has the very special nature required in order that life can exist? The point is that a great deal of “fine tuning” is required in order that life be possible. There are many relationships embedded in physical laws that are not explained by physics, but are required for life to be possible; in particular various fundamental constants are highly constrained in their values if life as we know it is to exist...What requires explanation is why the laws of physics are such as to allow this complex functionality (life) to work. ...We can conceive of universes where the laws of physics (and so of chemistry) were different than in ours. Almost any change in these laws will prevent life as we know it from functioning.”

Ellis posits as a first requirement for the laws of physics “the kind of regularities that can underlie the existence of life”: laws that are not based on symmetry and variational principles are unlikely to produce the kind of complexity that would be required for life. He also sets up general conditions that allow for organic life and cosmological boundary/initial conditions. In this respect he cites the following as necessary:

“Quantization that stabilizes matter and allows chemistry to exist through the Pauli exclusion principle;

The number D of large spatial dimensions must be just 3 for complexity to exist.

The seeds in the early universe for fluctuations (quantum fluctuations) that will later grow into galaxies must be of the right size that structures form without collapsing into black holes...

The size of the universe and its age must be large enough...we need a sufficiently old universe for second generation stars to come into existence and then for planets to have a stable life for long enough that evolution could lead to the emergence of intelligent life. Thus the universe must be at about 15 billion years old for life to exist.

Presumably the emergence of a classical era out of a quantum state is required. The very early universe would be a domain where quantum physics would dominate leading to complete uncertainty and an inability to predict the consequence of any initial situation; we need this to evolve to a state where classical physics leads to the properties of regularity and predictability that allow order to emerge.

The fact that the night sky is dark...is a consequence of the expansion of the universe together with the photon (light particle) to baryon (mass particle) ratio. This feature is a necessary condition for the existence of life: the biosphere on Earth functions by disposing of waste energy to the heat sink of the dark night sky. Thus one way of explaining why the sky is observed to be dark at night is that if this were not so, we would not be here to observe it.

Physical conditions on planets must be a in a quasi-equilibrium state for long enough to allow the delicate balances that enable our existence, through the very slow process of evolution, to be fulfilled.” (see the Theology of Water.)

“Life is possible because both the laws of physics and the boundary conditions for the universe have a very special nature. only particular laws of physics, and particular initial conditions in the Universe, allow the existence of intelligent life of the kind we know. No evolutionary process whatever is possible for any kind of life if these laws and conditions do not have this restricted form.”

Robert Koons summarizes some general objections to invoking the Anthropic Principle for carbon-based life "well isn't that special" (as the Church Lady might say):

The problem of "old evidence";

Laws of nature don't need to be explained;

We had to be here in any event (see Penrose's quote above);

Exotic life might exist;

The Copernican Principle--rejection of anthropocentricity is fundamental to science;

We're only one among many universes (see below).

Objection 1 can be countered by the argument that such evidence is used frequently in science when direct experiments can't be done--witness the General Relativity explanation of the advance in the perihelion of Mercury.

Objection 2 would do away with all interpretations of theory, quantum mechanics, and the philosophy of science.

Objection 3 is countered as in Thomas Nagel's quote above; as information seeking life form we need explanations.

Objection 4 is invalid--we're talking about conditions for carbon-based life; science-fiction can explore and has explored conditions for exotic life.

Objection 5--the Anthropic Principle was introduced to rebut the Copernican Principle.

Objection 6--the multiverse proposition is not itself proven.

The philosophic/metaphysical context for these Anthropic conditions that Ellis sets forth will be given in the final post for this summary. It should be noted that one interpretation of the anthropic coincidences is the theory that infinitely many universes with potentially different physical laws and constants exist and so it is not unlikely that in all these one universe with appropriate conditions for life would be present. The analogy is like that of having a lottery ticket with the numbers 1 1 1 1 1 be the winner. That combination of numbers looks improbable, but since there are a whole host of numbers from 00000 to 99999, it is no less probable than any other number. This brings up the notion of a multiverse, which will be discussed in the next post. (See Part 33)

Ed. Note:

I am sorry that I cannot properly display all the various pictures or tables on the post. They will, however, be displayed on the pamphlet containing this post, and a link will be provided for your convenience.

From a series of articles written by: Bob Kurland - a Catholic Scientist

#catholic physics

0 notes