#thomas markle jr

[royal-confessions]

“notice how Meghan has not once mentioned her shit stain of a brother ever meanwhile he keeps talking about her for attention. Her niece on the other hand never talks about her in the media and they actually HAVE a loving relationship. Thomas just needs to go away fr.” - Submitted by Anonymous

[sussex-sweetheart]

GB News and Dan Wootton need to stop giving a platform to bad people just to shit on Meghan. First Samantha, a child abuser, then Thomas Jr, a man who pulled a gun on his girlfriend, and now Andrew Tate, a man being arrested for human trafficking...

At what point do we start holding Wootton responsible for who he has on his show? Why is he allowed to get away with promoting these assholes? When are we going to call him out for supporting this behaviour? 🤢

[jerseydeanne]

[royalpain16]

Watch "Family counseling 😂" on YouTube

A very funny Thomas Markle Jr. Check it out.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

IPSO anon here.

Re: parliament vote, Thomas revealed, Markle setting him up.

I think the 3 things are 3 sides of the same triangle. This is my theory. 

I don’t think Markle needed to set her father up per se since all 3, Thomas, Doria AND Meghan, were using the same pap in the 205-2018 period. 

However, I firmly believe that she ghosted her father a long time before the wedding, but either he wasn’t getting the hint or he was saw a chance to make some money/ sell a recrafted image because he saw that Doria was making her own papstrolls without a peep from Markle.

Doria is excluded from being media revealed because Markle seeded the R card so the media will never reveal Doria or at the very least proceed with extreme caution. 

So Markle knows Thomas is a staged papstroll, but can’t tell the royals the truth. Or even if she did set him up, the pictures were very clearly staged and everyone knew it except the royals who inexplicably believed her explanations when she was clearly ( allegedly) lying on many different things especially involving media. 

Having ( allegedly)  dropped Thomas, she had no legit way to make it public without looking like a cold so and so. 

And perhaps you are correct with your theory that the plan involved some sort of very public fakery to allow him to decline his invitation publicly.

Either way, the media revelation of the staged pap photos was the golden ticket that fell into all their laps. 

Most of the public don’t follow the royals like we do ie they don’t know enough to see that she lied and then used a very feeble excuse to drop him. They don’t see that Doria was doing the same yet remains unscathed, that Markle wished to drop Thomas long before the wedding, if she hadn’t done so already.  

The first they know about any of this is the media revelation. Which the media AND all Markles pretend to be SHOCKED that he was staging pics when it was pretty obvious at the time of publication to everyone that they were staged. 

In comparison, imagine media outing Meghan’s carpark papstrolls framed as SHOCKED to find that they were staged. 

And this revelation is the perfect opportunity for all parties to withdraw. 

I think what was shocking for Thomas was finally facing the fact that his beloved, favourite daughter really had ghosted him and that’s what drove him to hospital. 

It took many months for it to finally sink in and that’s why he kept trying to contact her though his only route was via the media as she wasn’t responding privately. 

Going by Thomas Jnr’s social media, it’s finally sank in and he is done with her. 

****

This makes a lot of sense. 

This is also why I think the Samantha Markle v. Meghan Markle lawsuit is going to be very interesting. If it goes to trial (and right now, that’s up in the air since there are rumors that WME is pressuring Meghan to settle), the mud is going to fly - Samantha will try to ruin Meghan, Harry, and Doria down; Meghan will try to ruin Samantha, Thomas, and Thomas Jr.; and both of them will tell on themselves. It runs in the family, after all.

[skippyv20]

She must have stopped sending him money….

[snifflesthemouse]

Thomas Markle Jr is hilarious. I would love to have a conversation with him...

He's figured out a way to tell us things without actually saying it. He pretends he's acting out skits. And it's clever...

He even said it would never happen, them allowing MM to use or abuse him further.

I do hope I'm wrong, that Sr and MM aren't still secretly in contact.

Imagine how much money would be had, though.

If she's not in secret contact with him, he will be even more desperate for a chance to meet his grandchildren.

You do remember he was the one who said, "Just come here, you and Harry. Let's give them a photo of us all happy together, to shut them up. To get them off your back" right?

He was showing her the way out to end that whole fiasco. What did she do? She turned it into a story talking point for her conman toolbox.

So, now, she has a way to stay relevant AND prolong out to build tension and climactic moments.

The problem with narcs... most EVERY single person around them already knows they're narcs. It's the Despite Factor people forget about.

Money talks. Money walks. Money makes the world sell butt pics on OF. Money could motivate anyone.

And when you're legit getting invited out to be slighted out... well, desperation will eventually become too hard to hide.

The rinse will get you when the wash missed you. Always.

Oh and Gayle King... she's not ever going to get over being slighted over a lack of a proper interview. She needed them to secure the position Nora wants. And well...

Remember, they premeditate everything for a reason.

[anonymoushouseplantfan]

Plant

Wonder why MM did not jump on opportunity to have BRF negotiate NDAs with her family? It seems as though they had been willing to intercede on her behalf.

Maybe the BRF didn’t offer to do NDAs? Maybe what was offered was not enough for MM to agree to let them?

Have you seen Tom Markle Jr YouTube channel?🫣🤢😝…talk about crude and degrading no wonder she is so angry at the world.

This confused everyone. Cory was supposedly bought off, but Thomas, who turned out to be a lot more dangerous, wasn’t? And Doria apparently has a stipend, so she is being compensated for her silence. Why not do the same for dad?

It was very short-sighted and stupid, but like Nina Cowne said, “when she’s done with you she’s done with you.”

[royal-confessions]

“Kate's sister is the best friend, her brother-in-law is a billionaire, her sister-in-law is a successful french entrepreneur, her parents are self made millionaires, her in laws adore her...No wonder, Meghan's jealous of Kate, trying to bring her down as much as she can. She ended up with two greedy half siblings that will sell her to the press for 50 dollars and a father that will call out her self-grandiose lies in public. I don't blame Meghan, if her "woke" feminist narrative makes her feel better about herself she better be living in her bubble of delusion without involving other people, tho.” - Submitted by Anonymous

[heir-less]

The Middleton and Markle in-laws share a lot in common . . . mainly their incompetence in everything they attempt and their desire to be in front of a camera/in the papers.

Samantha, Carole, Pippa (although in recent years she's taken a step back) Thomas Jr/Sr, and Gary have all ridden the wave of Kate/Meghan's marriages to varying levels of success. The Middletons, however, at least support Kate and aren't total assholes toward their most successful member. Could you imagine Tom Sr writing about Meghan the same way Gary does about Kate?

[jerseydeanne]

Thomas Markle Jr: 'Sussexes need to stick to rescuing chickens in Montecito & stay out of politics'

[royalpain16]

[the-empress-7]

Thomas Markle JR was right , remember that letter he wrote Empress,? Her family knows her well that's why she didnt want Harry to meet her father or any member of her family xcept DD ...Druggie Doria lol

Yep. Good thing Doria is black, it's literally the only reason why Meghan hasn't ghosted her. She will once she divorces Harry though. Meghan will go back to being a white woman.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

Timeline, Part 1 - An Update

I forgot the Daily Mail takedowns. Doh! (I kept that list separately and just totally forgot about it.) Tumblr is being weird when I try to update the other post so I'm putting the Daily Mail stuff here and I'll also add them to the main post.

First, some links that validate events on the main post:

Harry dating Sarah Macklin

Piers and Meghan have drinks

Doria papped after the relationship is outed

Meghan merches a H&M necklace and Harry is actually photographed (by Splash, of all people) outside Meghan's Toronto home immediately after his Caribbean tour ends.

Harry wants a bigger apartment and has his eyes set on the Gloucesters's home.

Meghan drops Reitmans

Harry talks about receiving therapy and help for his grief with Diana's death

4/30/2016: Kate revealed as the Vogue 100 (June 2016) cover star and story.

5/8/2016 - 5/14/2016: Harry is in Florida for the Orlando Invictus Games.

5/10/2016: Piers Morgan writes a "Good King Henry" article claiming Harry would be a better King than William.

6/12/2016: Daily Mail publishes a story about The Queen's tiara collection. (iykyk...)

6/28/2016: Harry appears with Coldplay at a Kensington Palace concert. This concert is often cited as proof that Harry is in London at the time they claim they were set up.

July 2016: (dates unknown)

Thomas Markle Jr. claims that Harry met Thomas during July 2016.

The Daily Mail claims Harry took Meghan to L.A. for a weekend of partying that sealed the deal and became officially boyfriend-girlfriend.

Meghan travels to Spain with Misha Nonoo. I think Markus Anderson is there too (there's a photo of a guy who looks like him with Meghan and Misha) but I can't tell.

9/8/2016: Harry is voted world's most hottest royal.

10/27/2016 - 11/4/2016: Harry is claimed to be in Toronto and a new version of how they met - in this version, they met at a charity event and Harry kept texting Meghan until she agreed to a date.

11/1/2016: Samatha Markle speaks out for the first time and a story about Meghan's fashion is published.

11/3/2016: Misha Nonoo revealed as the mutual friend that set Harry and Meghan up. Daily Mail publishes a "No one wants to marry Harry and he's desperate for love but Meghan isn't The One" editorial.

11/4/2016: Meghan pap walks and merches a hotel. Daily Mail publishes about Meghan's ancestry and that Meghan looks like Pippa.

11/5/2016: Meghan leaks that she wants to spend Christmas with Harry in the UK. Daily Mail publishes a "Diana wouldn't like Meghan" editorial.

11/6/2019: "Meghan, this is not how royals behave" editorlal published and Meghan leaks that she's very close with Princess Eugenie.

11/12/2016: "Harry, this is not how royals behave, stop calling us racists" editorial published.

11/14/2016: "Remember when Meghan had to choose between Prince William or Prince Harry" throwback article by the Daily Mail

11/15/2016: Meghan leaks that she will give up everything for Harry and the royal family.

11/16/2016: Meghan leaks that she wants private security from Harry and the royals.

11/19/2016: "Meghan the Kate lookalike" article published

11/21/2016: The royals don't like that stories and gossip about Meghan is taking over Harry's Caribbean tour and their work.

11/22/2016: Meghan's comment that she wants to "smash glass ceilings, don't wear glass slippers" is published. The subtext is that she won't be a cooperative associate of the royal family.

11/23/2016: An article about Harry making a tribute to Meghan while on the Caribbean tour is published. This is the very first "sweet nod" PR piece, though the phrase isn't actually used in the article.

11/25/2016: Daily Mail reports that William is not happy with Harry's love shield statement. This only fuels the rumors.

11/27/2016: Meghan and Priyanka's friendship is revealed.

12/9/2016: Yoga pap walk to merch Harry's bracelet

12/10/2016: Harry is hunting in Bavaria with friends and Meghan goes shopping in Toronto while the rest of the Suits cast attends Patrick Adams's wedding in California. Meghan claims she knew her attendance at the wedding would bring out the paparazzi and after discussing it with Patrick, decided to stay home to give them privacy. Rumors begin of a falling out between Meghan and the Suits cast over her behavior (e.g., entitlement and demands for special treatment) since dating Harry. Rumors that Meghan had an affair with one of her Suits castmates also resurface.

12/17/2016: The Markles sell photos of Meghan's childhood.

12/20/2016: Daily Mail writes about Meghan's topless photos and one of the first Kate hitjobs is published, an article that says Meghan has a better fashion style than Kate and that Kate should take inspiration from her.

12/21/2016: Daily Mail writes about Meghan's racy Suits scenes and an article claiming Meghan has been harassed and attacked by her half-sister is published, beginning Meghan's victim narrative. The Samantha article leads to speculation that Meghan dragged these issues up and into the public to bury her topless photos and sexy scenes. Later, it is also speculated that "Everyone Loves Classy" is meant to repair Meghan's reputation to make her royal appropriate.

12/27/2016: Yoga pap walk with Doria.

12/30/2016: A "Meghan is just like Diana" article is published, talking about Meghan's humanitarian work in and interest in Africa.

1/1/2017: The Daily Mail publishes more of Meghan's racy photos.

1/4/2017: Tom Markle Jr. confirms that Harry has met Thomas Markle "about six months ago" and that Thomas has known about the relationship since the very beginning.

1/6/2017: Another Kate hit job is published, stating that the Duchess will have to deal with being compared to Meghan, whose philanthropy is far more successful.

1/7/2017: Meghan leaks that she will be attending Skippy's wedding with Harry.

1/10/2017: The Daily Mail publishes photographs and stories about Meghan's first wedding to Trevor.

1/11/2017: Meghan spreads engagement rumors to E News! It's later confirmed that E News is one of Meghan's go-tos to leak info about the royals and her relationship so there's a solid confidence that she's trying to push Harry's hand.

1/14/2017: Meghan leaks to the Daily Mail that Harry plans to take her skiing in Verbier and her brother, Tom Markle Jr., has been arrested.

1/17/2017 - 1/18/2017: More information and details about Tom Jr.'s arrest are published.

1/20/2017: Kensington Palace announces that William and Kate are moving back to London in the fall when William's contract with EAAA ends in the summer.

1/22/2017: Meghan is papped at the airport in Mumbai, preparing to go home after 5 days in India for World Vision. There is some speculation that Meghan was a last-minute addition to the India program to get some good PR following her brother's drama but it's quickly debunked when a) veteran blogs point out that Meghan's strategy to bury bad news/criticism is a pap walk or a royal connection, not going off the radar and b) her November interview with Vancouver Star plugging the India trip is rediscovered.

1/27/2017: Meghan spreads rumors that they're really engaged now and Harry proposed over a glass of champagne.

1/28/2017: Kensington Palace announces that William and Harry have commissioned a statue of Diana for the KP gardens.

1/31/2017: Meghan tips off the Daily Mail about an article she wrote for The Tig about her dream bachelorette party. Rumors begin that this is Meghan announcing her availability to sponsors for merching opportunities in the UK when she marries Harry.

2/22/2017: A Cambridge hit job is published, pointing out that they don't hold hands and aren't affectionate in public.

2/25/2017: Meghan tries to convince us that she's firmly established in the UK with a group of society girls who've become close friends.

2/26/2017: Toronto pap walk to merch an elephant bracelet

2/28/2017: The Daily Mail publishes that Meghan has never met a freebie she didn't turn down.

3/5/2017: Meghan merches Cartier.

3/12/2017: Meghan leaks that Pippa doesn't want her at the wedding and has banned her with a "no ring, no bring" rule.

3/13/2017: The Daily Mail publishes a story and photographs of Meghan's very special episode of 90210. It's later that that Meghan leaked about William's dad dancing in Switzerland to bury this but more likely, it's Meghan's leaks that she will meet The Queen soon that are meant to bury the 90210 work.

3/20/2017: "Meghan is still the same girl I've always known, this fame isn't changing her" editorial by Lindsey Roth is published. This is in response to quiet-but-growing-louder speculation that Meghan has a new sense of entitlement, attitude, and rudeness.

4/3/2017: It's announced that Samantha Markle plans to write a book about Meghan. (Meghan gives her first brief against her sister the next day, on 4/4, largely in response to this news.)

4/8/2017: Meghan claps back against Pippa's "no ring, no bring" rule via an editorial.

4/9/2017: Meghan leaks that she loves Africa and Harry is taking her to visit again in October when Suits wraps.

4/20/2017: Meghan commissions a "Meghan is just like Kate" piece in the Daily Mail.

4/28/2017: Middleton hit job, accusing them of spending more time with the Cambridge children than their royal relatives. (Honestly, this reads more like a Charles hit job than Meghan's but it's part of a larger trend of Meghan sourcing stories that attack Kate.)

As always, corrections, additions, updates, and links are welcome!

Hopefully Tumblr stops acting up and I can incorporate these into the main post.

[skippyv20]

Samantha Markle lawsuit

r/SaintMeghanMarkle

Posted by u/BuildtheHerd17 hours agolawsuits

YOU SAW IT HERE FIRST: The 38 Statements Samantha Markle Demands Megs Admit to and 23 Questions She wants Meg to Answer Under Oath. These were among the documents filed yesterday (Feb 3, 2023) as part of the defamation lawsuit Markle v. Markle. Boy, this is getting juicy!!!

I discovered these when searching through the court documents that were filed yesterday. Here’s my post for today on those court filings related to the deposition of Megs, Harry and others: https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/10tutlx/megs_halfsister_samantha_markle_has_formally/

Samantha Markle Demands that Megs Admit the Following 38 Statements:

You are not an only child.

You have a half-sister named Samantha M. Markle.

You have a half-brother named Thomas Markle, Jr.

Your sister, Samantha Markle has driven you to school on a regular basis at a certain period of your life.

You and your half sister, Samantha Markle have gone on shopping trips to a mall which was local to you.

You sent an email to Jason Knauf with the subject line Re: Omid and Carolyn Book, a copy of which is attached, hereto and marked as Exhibit “A.”

The copy of the email attached hereto and marked as Exhibit “A” is a true copy of the email you sent.

You sent an email to Jason Knauf in which you stated “for when you sit down with them it may be helpful to have some background reminders, so I’ve included them below just in case.”

You sent an email to Jason Knauf in which you stated under the section entitled Family; relationship with family and father (past and present): “media pressure crumbled him [Thomas Markle] and he began doing press deals brokered by his daughter Samantha.”

You sent an email to Jason Knauf in which you stated under the section entitled Family; M’s relationship with half-siblings (date/timing): “Meghan saw them a handful of times when she was under the age of 5, and again when she was 11 years old. She didn’t see her half sister again until her father asked her to attend Samantha’s graduation in New Mexico when Meghan was 22 years old.”

The statement “Meghan saw them a handful of times when she was under the age of 5, and again when she was 11 years old. She didn’t see her half sister again until her father asked her to attend Samantha’s graduation in New Mexico when Meghan was 22 years old” is false.

You sent an email to Jason Knauf in which you stated under the section entitled Family; M’s relationship with half-siblings (date/timing): “Upon Meghan dating Harry, Samantha changed her last name back to Markle, and began a career creating stories to sell to the press.”

You know that Samantha changed her name back prior to you dating Harry.

You sent an email to Jason Knauf in which you stated under the section entitled Family; M’s relationship with half-siblings (date/timing): “Meghan has never had a relationship with either of them; she was always referred to as an only child by both of her parents and all of her friends through her entire upbringing because the half siblings were not in the picture.”

The statement: “Meghan has never had a relationship with either of them; she was always referred to as an only child by both of her parents and all of her friends through her entire upbringing because the half siblings were not in the picture” is false.

There are more photographs of you and Mrs. Markle than the one you showed the press, and you personally possess more photographs of your half-sister, Samantha.

Your husband, Prince Harry, emailed Jason Knauf and stated: “I totally agree that we have to be able to say we didn’t have anything to do with it” and that “equally, you giving the right context and background to them would help get some truths out there.”

You gave Jason Knauf, via email, several “background reminders” for his meeting with the authors of Finding Freedom.

You stated in your “Primetime Special” interview with Oprah Winfrey on CBS that Mrs. Markle “she [Samantha Markle] changed her last name back to Markle, and I think she’s an early fifties at the time only when I started dating Harry.”

Samantha Markle was born with the name of Yvonne Marie Markle.

You stated in a British court proceeding that neither you, nor your husband, had anything to do with the content of Finding Freedom.

You did participate in providing some of the content relating to Samantha Markle to the authors of Finding Freedom.

You told the British court “In the light of the information and documents that Mr. Knauf has provided, I accept that Mr. Knauf did provide some information to the authors for the book [Finding Freedom] and that he did so with my knowledge, for a meeting that he planned for with the authors in his capacity as Communications Secretary. The extent of the information he shared is unknown to me.”

You stated in your “Primetime Special” interview with Oprah Winfrey on CBS that, since the day of the interview, you last saw Mrs. Markle “at least 18, 19 years ago and before that, 10 years before that.”

The statement you made in the interview with Oprah Winfrey on CBS that you had not seen Samantha Markle since “at least 18, 19 years ago and before that, 10 years before that” was not true.

You had a conversation with Mr. Knauf following his meeting with the authors of Finding Freedom, in which Mr. Knauf briefed you as to what he discussed with the authors of Finding Freedom.

You invited Samantha Markle to your first wedding.

You have lived in the same residence as Samantha Markle.

You were never forced at the age of thirteen (13) to work in low-paying jobs to make ends meet.

Queen Elizabeth was not a racist.

King Charles is not a racist.

When attending auditions, you drove a Ford Explorer with functioning doors.

You attended a private catholic day school, Immaculate Heart High School.

On July 27, 2013, you posted on Instagram that you had lunch at a fine dining restaurant, Musso & Frank Grill with your father after every tap and ballet class.

You did not publicly defend or support Mrs. Markle after she received negative press.

In the email dated December 10, 2018, you stated that the Plaintiff “had lost custody of all three of her children from different fathers.”

Mrs. Markle never lost custody of her three children.

You called the Plaintiff from the show of “Deal or No Deal” in Buenos Aires.

Twenty-three questions Samantha Markle wants answers to:

Please list each and every lawsuit in which you have been a party in the last ten (10) years.

Have you ever provided any information to Jason Knauf for him to share with the authors of Finding Freedom?

Did you at any discuss with anyone the idea of them participating or not participating in providing information to the authors of Finding Freedom or contact the authors of Finding Freedom?

At any point in time did you live with any of your siblings, half-siblings, or stepsiblings?

Did your relationship with Samantha Markle become estranged at any point in time?

Please list each and every written communication sent by you that pertains to the book Finding Freedom.

Other than your email to Mr. Knauf, did you ever contact the authors (or request that someone else contact the authors of Finding Freedom) to provide other information for Finding Freedom?

Did you discuss talking points with Oprah Winfrey, or agents/representatives/agents of Ms. Winfrey ahead of your CBS Primetime Special?

Please state whether or not you have ever spoken out in defense of the Plaintiff after seeing the public scrutiny/hatred she has received from your fans.

Please explain why you failed to produce your emails to Mr. Knauf in the British Court Proceeding, Appeals Nos. A3/2021/0609 and A3/2021/0943, Case No. IL-2019-0001110.

Have you ever requested that any member of the Royal Family Public Relations Team write stories about the Plaintiff or initiate negative press about the Plaintiff?

In your Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 23] you indicated: “I asked my father to intervene with the Plaintiff.” Please state: (a) what you actually said to your father in this regard, (b) the date when this request was made, © the method of the request (email, text, telephone, etc.), (d) the content of this request, and (e) provide (a) – (d) for any other communications between you and Thomas Markle which stemmed from any and all of such Requests.

Did Mr. Knauf ever brief you or contacting [sic] you following his meeting with the authors of Finding Freedom to discuss what happened?

In Jason Knauf’s email to you regarding his upcoming interview with the authors of Finding Freedom (Omid and Carolyn), he stated: “Please see attached the areas Omid and Carolyn have asked to discuss with me. My advice is that we do not ask your friends to directly engage with them. I think it is important that we can say hand on heart they had no access, just in case it goes into any difficult territory.” You replied “Very helpful – thank you! Shows we’ve been on exactly the same page which is good!” What was your understanding of what was meant by “difficult territory?” Why did you want to keep the communication with the authors of Finding Freedom covert?

Were you aware that the Plaintiff was forced to seek and obtain an “Injunction for Protection Against Stalking” in Polk County, Florida, against one of your fans? If so, please state whether you ever reached out to the Plaintiff upon discovering this Injunction.

If so, please explain the reason(s) why you believe the Plaintiff only changed her name back to Samantha Markle when you started dating Prince Harry.

In your email with Jason Knauf, you state “all of these facts can be validated by anyone who has known Meghan since childhood or afterwards.” Please list the full name, last known address, last known phone numbers and last known email address of each and every person you believe may validate the information you provided to Mr. Knauf.

Please list the full name, last known phone numbers, last known addresses and last known email addresses of each and every person who witnessed the events and/or has knowledge relevant to the allegations in the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. With respect to each individual identified, describe in detail the nature and substance of the knowledge or information such individual possesses.

Please list and briefly describe the Plaintiff’s “in-person and other interactions with Meghan after 1999” as stated in your initial disclosures.

Explain how you lack any involvement in the writing and editing of Finding Freedom given your email communications with Mr. Knauf ahead of his meeting with the authors of Finding Freedom? Please describe each and every document which you believe supports the proposition in your Initial Disclosures that you had “a lack of involvement in the writing and editing of Finding Freedom.”

Did you invite Ashleigh Hale to your first wedding? Did you disinvite Ashleigh Hale to your first wedding? If you did disinvite Ashleigh Hale to your first wedding, please state: (a) the date when Ms. Hale was disinvited, (b) who disinvited Ashleigh Hale, © the method of disinviting Ashleigh Hale (i.e., phone call, text message, email, etc.), and (d) explain the reason and/or reasons why Ashleigh Hale was disinvited to your first wedding.

Please list the full name of each and every relative invited to attend your first wedding. For each individual listed, please also provide the date that he/she was invited to your first wedding and whether or not he/she attended your first wedding.

List all of the people who you invited from your family and friends to attend your wedding to your husband, Harry, and which of those people attended.

562 upvotes

•

293 comments

Excellent!  Thank you!❤️