#wikipedia page creation service

[hatsoff21]

Top 3 SEO Companies In Cuttack 2024 Ranking

Discover Cuttack's top 3 SEO companies for 2024! Securing the right SEO agency is paramount in the competitive digital marketing realm. From SEO companies to digital marketing agencies, Cuttack's landscape is teeming with options. Our list, meticulously curated based on expertise, performance, and client satisfaction, ensures you find the perfect fit. Whether you're a Start-up or a corporate giant, our ranking covers the best resources to boost your online presence. Explore the top 6 to 10 SEO agencies and embark on a journey to dominate Cuttack's digital marketing scene with the best digital marketing agencies by your side.

1.??? Top 3 SEO Companies in Cuttack: Hats-Off Digital

Based in Pune, India, Hats-Off (Rich Media) is a dynamic digital marketing firm dedicated to brand creation, enhancement, and activation. Their strength lies in purpose-driven creativity, brand marketing expertise, and mobile, research, and digital media proficiency. The company prioritises delivering RESULTS and crafting programming apps that forge strong connections between people and products. They tailor teams to suit each client's needs, developing programs that encapsulate their brand's essence and allure. Serving organisations of all sizes and industries, Hats-Off specialises in leveraging the power of the Internet to drive growth and success. Their Digital Marketing and SEO Optimization expertise ensures that their clients thrive in the digital landscape. Hats-Off is recognised as one of Cuttack's top digital marketing companies in eight other cities in India.

2.??? Top 3 SEO Companies in Cuttack: Techno Infonet-Cuttack Division

Established in 2004, Techno Infonet embarked on its journey with modest beginnings. Since then, it has meticulously assembled a team of over 45 highly skilled professionals chosen for their expertise and passion. Committed to delivering top-notch results, Techno Infonet ensures qualitative outcomes for its business partners at every turn. With a global reach spanning over 15 countries, their client base speaks volumes about their reliability and effectiveness. As one of the premier digital marketing agencies in Cuttack, Techno Infonet's dedication to excellence positions it among the top 5 SEO companies in the region, solidifying its reputation as a leading SEO agency in Cuttack.

3.??? Top 3 SEO Companies in Cuttack: ColourMoon Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Colour Moon Technologies emerges as a premier software, web, and mobile app development company renowned for delivering unparalleled technology services across various domains. With a seasoned team of professionals who are well-versed in cutting-edge technologies, Colour Moon Technologies excels in providing bespoke solutions tailored to meet diverse business needs. As a trusted technology partner, they've enabled numerous organisations to succeed through optimised and result-driven IT solutions. Recognised as the best IT service provider, Colour Moon Technologies has forged partnerships with industry giants like Salesforce, HubSpot, Intel, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft. With over 5000 projects executed globally for 2000+ clients since 2008, their ISO 9001:2015 certification underscores their commitment to excellence. Operating from Vizag, Vijayawada, Hyderabad, and Jaipur, Colour Moon Technologies stands out as a leader in the digital realm.

In conclusion, navigating Cuttack's dynamic digital marketing landscape demands partnering with the best SEO agencies. Our comprehensive ranking of the top 3 SEO companies in Cuttack for 2024 sheds light on the industry's frontrunners. Among them, Hats-Off Digital emerges as the quintessential choice, recognised as one of Cuttack's top 3 SEO companies and the best SEO agency. With a commitment to delivering tailored solutions and driving online success for businesses, Hats-Off Digital epitomises excellence in digital marketing. As companies strive for prominence, aligning with the best SEO agency is paramount for staying ahead in Cuttack's competitive market.

[12k4-h]

Understanding Why Your Wikipedia Page Was Deleted

Have you ever found yourself in a situation where you eagerly searched for your name or your company's name on Wikipedia, only to discover that the page you were hoping to see has vanished into thin air? If so, you're not alone. Many individuals and organizations face the perplexing issue of their Wikipedia pages being deleted without a clear explanation.

Wikipedia, the world's largest online encyclopedia, is known for its strict guidelines and community-driven content management. While Wikipedia pages can be immensely beneficial for individuals and businesses alike, they are subject to scrutiny and deletion if they fail to meet Wikipedia's rigorous standards.

Reasons a Wikipedia deletes a page

So, why was your Wikipedia page deleted? There could be several reasons behind this unfortunate occurrence:

1. Notability

Wikipedia requires that subjects meet a certain level of notability to warrant a dedicated page. This means that individuals or organizations must have received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources to merit inclusion. If your page lacked credible sources establishing your notability, it may have been deemed non-notable and subsequently deleted.

2. Conflict of Interest

Wikipedia strongly discourages individuals and organizations from editing pages about themselves or their interests. If it's suspected that a page has been created or edited with a biased perspective, it may be flagged for deletion. This often happens when individuals or businesses attempt to promote themselves or their products/services on Wikipedia.

3. Copyright Violations

Wikipedia strictly adheres to copyright laws and policies. If the content on your page was found to be plagiarized or in violation of copyright, it would likely be deleted to avoid legal issues.

4. Lack of Reliable Sources

Wikipedia places great emphasis on using reliable, verifiable sources to support claims made in articles. If your page lacked proper citations or relied heavily on questionable sources, it could be subject to deletion for not meeting Wikipedia's sourcing standards.

5. Promotional Content

 Wikipedia is not a platform for self-promotion or advertising. Pages that read like promotional material rather than neutral, informative content are often flagged and eventually deleted.

Steps to take if your Wikipedia page has been deleted

If your Wikipedia page has been deleted, all hope is not lost. It's essential to understand the reasons behind the deletion and take appropriate action to address the issues. Here are some steps you can take:

1. Review Wikipedia Guidelines

Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's content guidelines and policies to understand where your page may have fallen short.

2. Improve Sourcing

If the deletion was due to a lack of reliable sources, work on gathering credible references and citations to establish notability.

3. Neutralize Content

Ensure that the content on your page is written from a neutral point of view, avoiding promotional language or biased perspectives.

4. Seek Help

Consider contacting experienced Wikipedia editors or a Wikipedia page creation agency for assistance. These professionals can help navigate the complexities of Wikipedia and guide you through the process of creating a page that meets the site's standards. In conclusion, having your Wikipedia page deleted can be disheartening, but it's essential to approach the situation with a proactive mindset. By understanding the reasons behind the deletion and taking appropriate steps to address any issues, you can increase the likelihood of successfully creating and maintaining a Wikipedia page that stands the test of time.

[pixelmeta]

wikipedia page creation service, wikipedia page creation service india

[battle-pack]

Wikipedia Page Creation Service

Wikipedia Page Creation services also assist with reputation management. Over 460 million people visit Wikipedia and rely on the information posted on it. Wikipedia has become the Internet Encyclopedia of today’s age. If all is well, the page will be allowed to be published on the Wikipedia site. Create, add or modify content. Of course, there are moderators who will monitor the content posted.

[customized3dprinting]

Wikipedia Page Creation services also assist with reputation management. Over 460 million people visit Wikipedia and rely on the information posted on it. Wikipedia has become the Internet Encyclopedia of today’s age. If all is well, the page will be allowed to be published on the Wikipedia site. Create, add or modify content. Of course, there are moderators who will monitor the content posted.

[sunidhichauhan52]

Want Your Company On Wikipedia? Here Are The Guidelines You Will Need To Follow

When people hear that anyone is allowed to add content to Wikipedia, they assume they can add any kind of information written in any format on the platform. But in reality, the content added on Wikipedia is governed by a strict and intricate array of guidelines and policies.

Even though Wikipedia might be an online platform, it is still an encyclopedia and doesn't accept anything. Although it has much broader policies than a traditional encyclopedia, Wikipedia still has rigid policies in place, keeping only articles that meet its specific criteria.

Rather than having a list of what topics can be written about, Wikipedia instead filters out content using its general content policies. So, what can be added to Wikipedia is not stated in advance; rather it is decided according to some basic principles that have been followed since the platform’s early days.

Although stringent, these policies make Wikipedia a reliable source of information. This is why it is an honour to have a page dedicated to you or your company on Wikipedia. Who wouldn’t want that?

Why Would You Want Your Company On Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is one of the most visited sites in the world and has the power to make or break a company or brand identity. Wikipedia’s readers include prospective clients, current customers, employees, stakeholders, investors, executives and journalists.

The first thing to remember is that Wikipedia is not a marketing platform; it is an encyclopedia. Thus, it is difficult to create a new Wikipedia article for businesses. From the universe of companies that want to be on Wikipedia, only a handful of those qualify.

If you want a Wikipedia page about yourself or your company/ brand, you will first need to understand the Wiki policies.

Understanding Wikipedia Policies

1. Verifiability: This means that any piece of content you add to Wikipedia must be verifiable: you should be able to verify that the content of the Wikipedia article is factual using reliable, third-party sources that have to be cited within the article. This policy of Verifiability aims to make Wikipedia more accurate.

If any reliable, third-party source does not discuss the topic, your article will not be accepted. This brings us to the next point of no original research.

2. No Original Research: This policy means that all the concepts and theories in Wikipedia articles should not be based on original research. Rather you should base your work on previously published accounts and ideas. Wikipedia articles are encyclopedic articles and should not contain original ideas, conclusions, descriptions or interpretations of facts. They should not contain the writer’s personal views, political options or any analysis of published materials.

3. Reliable Sources: There was much debate on what is a reliable source. This debate has led to the creation of a guideline called Reliable Sources. It lists a variety of possible types of sources that one can use as citations. This includes traditional scholarly books and articles and certain websites. Any Wikipedia page creation agency will ask you to present reliable sources if you want an article on your business.

4. Neutral Point of View: This point might seem to reiterate, but that is how essential it is. All the points of view about a particular topic should be represented fairly, from a neutral point of view. This policy is one of the oldest and central policies of the online encyclopedia. A neutral article makes no case and instead focuses on informing the reader by providing a good survey of the topic.

5. Notability: Apart from being written from a neutral point of view, Wikipedia articles should cover considered noteworthy worldwide. This guideline helps set a standard for inclusion to prevent Wikipedia from becoming a dump page for all and any kind of information. Usually, the lack of notability is the most common reason why a topic can be deemed unsuitable for a Wikipedia article. A Wikipedia page creation agency can help you determine if you or your company are notable enough for Wikipedia.

Those are some of the basic policies of Wikipedia surmised. Any reliable Wikipedia page creation service provider you approach will ensure that the topic you want an article written on follows these guidelines. Although Wikipedia has millions of articles on a range of topics, this does not mean that Wiki editors will accept articles that do not meet the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia.

For example, if your subject is not notable or does not have any reliable sources mentioning it, it is not possible to get it on Wikipedia. It is best to wait until more articles or news pieces are published on it for it to meet all the guidelines.

[prajaktasingh]

We Are Experienced Wikipedia Writers Group, We Are Wiki Experts. Wikipedia Experts is a team of certified and experienced wiki editors who are able to write and publish any Wikipedia article. We are a team of Wikipedia editors and professional writers.

[wikipagecreate]

Wiki Writing Service @ BrandingArea

When it comes to establishing a robust online presence and enhancing your digital reputation, having a well-crafted Wikipedia page can be a game-changer. Wikipedia is a platform known for its authority and influence in the digital landscape. It often ranks high in search engine results, making it a powerful tool for personal brands and businesses alike. At BrandingArea, we offer a comprehensive Wiki writing service designed to help you create and maintain a notable and informative presence on Wikipedia.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

How lock-in hurts design

Berliners: Otherland has added a second date (Jan 28) for my book-talk after the first one sold out - book now!

If you've ever read about design, you've probably encountered the idea of "paving the desire path." A "desire path" is an erosion path created by people departing from the official walkway and taking their own route. The story goes that smart campus planners don't fight the desire paths laid down by students; they pave them, formalizing the route that their constituents have voted for with their feet.

Desire paths aren't always great (Wikipedia notes that "desire paths sometimes cut through sensitive habitats and exclusion zones, threatening wildlife and park security"), but in the context of design, a desire path is a way that users communicate with designers, creating a feedback loop between those two groups. The designers make a product, the users use it in ways that surprise the designer, and the designer integrates all that into a new revision of the product.

This method is widely heralded as a means of "co-innovating" between users and companies. Designers who practice the method are lauded for their humility, their willingness to learn from their users. Tech history is strewn with examples of successful paved desire-paths.

Take John Deere. While today the company is notorious for its war on its customers (via its opposition to right to repair), Deere was once a leader in co-innovation, dispatching roving field engineers to visit farms and learn how farmers had modified their tractors. The best of these modifications would then be worked into the next round of tractor designs, in a virtuous cycle:

https://securityledger.com/2019/03/opinion-my-grandfathers-john-deere-would-support-our-right-to-repair/

But this pattern is even more pronounced in the digital world, because it's much easier to update a digital service than it is to update all the tractors in the field, especially if that service is cloud-based, meaning you can modify the back-end everyone is instantly updated. The most celebrated example of this co-creation is Twitter, whose users created a host of its core features.

Retweets, for example, were a user creation. Users who saw something they liked on the service would type "RT" and paste the text and the link into a new tweet composition window. Same for quote-tweets: users copied the URL for a tweet and pasted it in below their own commentary. Twitter designers observed this user innovation and formalized it, turning it into part of Twitter's core feature-set.

Companies are obsessed with discovering digital desire paths. They pay fortunes for analytics software to produce maps of how their users interact with their services, run focus groups, even embed sneaky screen-recording software into their web-pages:

https://www.wired.com/story/the-dark-side-of-replay-sessions-that-record-your-every-move-online/

This relentless surveillance of users is pursued in the name of making things better for them: let us spy on you and we'll figure out where your pain-points and friction are coming from, and remove those. We all win!

But this impulse is a world apart from the humility and respect implied by co-innovation. The constant, nonconsensual observation of users has more to do with controlling users than learning from them.

That is, after all, the ethos of modern technology: the more control a company can exert over its users ,the more value it can transfer from those users to its shareholders. That's the key to enshittification, the ubiquitous platform decay that has degraded virtually all the technology we use, making it worse every day:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/19/twiddler/

When you are seeking to control users, the desire paths they create are all too frequently a means to wrestling control back from you. Take advertising: every time a service makes its ads more obnoxious and invasive, it creates an incentive for its users to search for "how do I install an ad-blocker":

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/adblocking-how-about-nah

More than half of all web-users have installed ad-blockers. It's the largest consumer boycott in human history:

https://doc.searls.com/2023/11/11/how-is-the-worlds-biggest-boycott-doing/

But zero app users have installed ad-blockers, because reverse-engineering an app requires that you bypass its encryption, triggering liability under Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. This law provides for a $500,000 fine and a 5-year prison sentence for "circumvention" of access controls:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/12/youre-holding-it-wrong/#if-dishwashers-were-iphones

Beyond that, modifying an app creates liability under copyright, trademark, patent, trade secrets, noncompete, nondisclosure and so on. It's what Jay Freeman calls "felony contempt of business model":

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

This is why services are so horny to drive you to install their app rather using their websites: they are trying to get you to do something that, given your druthers, you would prefer not to do. They want to force you to exit through the gift shop, you want to carve a desire path straight to the parking lot. Apps let them mobilize the law to literally criminalize those desire paths.

An app is just a web-page wrapped in enough IP to make it a felony to block ads in it (or do anything else that wrestles value back from a company). Apps are web-pages where everything not forbidden is mandatory.

Seen in this light, an app is a way to wage war on desire paths, to abandon the cooperative model for co-innovation in favor of the adversarial model of user control and extraction.

Corporate apologists like to claim that the proliferation of apps proves that users like them. Neoliberal economists love the idea that business as usual represents a "revealed preference." This is an intellectually unserious tautology: "you do this, so you must like it":

https://boingboing.net/2024/01/22/hp-ceo-says-customers-are-a-bad-investment-unless-they-can-be-made-to-buy-companys-drm-ink-cartridges.html

Calling an action where no alternatives are permissible a "preference" or a "choice" is a cheap trick – especially when considered against the "preferences" that reveal themselves when a real choice is possible. Take commercial surveillance: when Apple gave Ios users a choice about being spied on – a one-click opt of of app-based surveillance – 96% of users choice no spying:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/05/96-of-us-users-opt-out-of-app-tracking-in-ios-14-5-analytics-find/

But then Apple started spying on those very same users that had opted out of spying by Facebook and other Apple competitors:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

Neoclassical economists aren't just obsessed with revealed preferences – they also love to bandy about the idea of "moral hazard": economic arrangements that tempt people to be dishonest. This is typically applied to the public ("consumers" in the contemptuous parlance of econospeak). But apps are pure moral hazard – for corporations. The ability to prohibit desire paths – and literally imprison rivals who help your users thwart those prohibitions – is too tempting for companies to resist.

The fact that the majority of web users block ads reveals a strong preference for not being spied on ("users just want relevant ads" is such an obvious lie that doesn't merit any serious discussion):

https://www.iccl.ie/news/82-of-the-irish-public-wants-big-techs-toxic-algorithms-switched-off/

Giant companies attained their scale by learning from their users, not by thwarting them. The person using technology always knows something about what they need to do and how they want to do it that the designers can never anticipate. This is especially true of people who are unlike those designers – people who live on the other side of the world, or the other side of the economic divide, or whose bodies don't work the way that the designers' bodies do:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/20/benevolent-dictators/#felony-contempt-of-business-model

Apps – and other technologies that are locked down so their users can be locked in – are the height of technological arrogance. They embody a belief that users are to be told, not heard. If a user wants to do something that the designer didn't anticipate, that's the user's fault:

https://www.wired.com/2010/06/iphone-4-holding-it-wrong/

Corporate enthusiasm for prohibiting you from reconfiguring the tools you use to suit your needs is a declaration of the end of history. "Sure," John Deere execs say, "we once learned from farmers by observing how they modified their tractors. But today's farmers are so much stupider and we are so much smarter that we have nothing to learn from them anymore."

Spying on your users to control them is a poor substitute asking your users their permission to learn from them. Without technological self-determination, preferences can't be revealed. Without the right to seize the means of computation, the desire paths never emerge, leaving designers in the dark about what users really want.

Our policymakers swear loyalty to "innovation" but when corporations ask for the right to decide who can innovate and how, they fall all over themselves to create laws that let companies punish users for the crime of contempt of business-model.

I'm Kickstarting the audiobook for The Bezzle, the sequel to Red Team Blues, narrated by @wilwheaton! You can pre-order the audiobook and ebook, DRM free, as well as the hardcover, signed or unsigned. There's also bundles with Red Team Blues in ebook, audio or paperback.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/24/everything-not-mandatory/#is-prohibited

Image: Belem (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Desire_path_%2819811581366%29.jpg

CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en

[hatsoff1]

Hats-Off is a Wikipedia Page Creation Agency and has a reputation of creating authentic and genuine information for posting it on the Wikipedia page. As Over 460 million people visit Wikipedia and rely on the information posted on it, Hats-Off posts the most up to date and genuine information.

[hatsoff21]

Enhancing Your Online Presence: The Impact of Wikipedia Writing Services

In today's digital era, establishing a strong online presence is essential for individuals and businesses alike. Among the myriad platforms available, Wikipedia stands out as a beacon of reliable information. However, crafting a Wikipedia page that accurately reflects your achievements while adhering to the platform's guidelines can be challenging. This is where professional Wikipedia writing services come into play, offering valuable assistance to those seeking to showcase their accomplishments effectively.

Wikipedia, often referred to as the internet's encyclopedia, holds immense power in shaping perceptions and providing insights into various topics. Whether you're an accomplished professional or a thriving business, having a presence on Wikipedia can significantly boost your online credibility.

Professional Wikipedia writing services offer a range of benefits that can help you create a compelling and informative Wikipedia page. One of the primary advantages is access to experienced writers who understand the intricacies of Wikipedia's policies. These writers ensure that your page meets the platform's notability criteria and maintains a neutral tone, enhancing its credibility.

Moreover, these services conduct thorough research to gather relevant information and sources to support the content of your page. Whether it's highlighting your professional achievements or detailing your business's history, these writers pay meticulous attention to detail to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Navigating the editing process on Wikipedia can be daunting for those unfamiliar with its guidelines. Professional Wikipedia writing services streamline this process, handling everything from content submission to addressing feedback from the platform's community of editors. This saves you time and effort while ensuring that your page meets Wikipedia's editorial standards.

Furthermore, these services provide ongoing maintenance and monitoring to keep your Wikipedia page up-to-date. In an ever-changing digital landscape, having a team dedicated to monitoring and updating your page is crucial for maintaining its relevance and credibility.

For businesses, a well-crafted Wikipedia page can serve as a valuable tool for attracting customers, investors, and partners. It provides an overview of your company's history, achievements, and contributions, establishing trust and credibility within your industry.

Conclusion

Professional Wikipedia writing services offer a valuable solution for individuals and businesses seeking to enhance their online presence. By entrusting the creation and maintenance of your Wikipedia page to these professionals, you can effectively showcase your achievements while adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Whether you're looking to highlight your accomplishments or showcase your business's success, partnering with a reputable Wikipedia writing service can help you achieve your goals with confidence.

[princeloww]

The Real St. Judes: Gartloch Hospital - History (abridged)

The Scottish Lunacy Act of 1857 saw the creation of the Glasgow District Lunacy Board. The act, through these boards, aimed to establish and operate "district asylums", which would house patients unable to pay for the already existing "Royal Asylums".

In 1889, the Gartloch Estate was purchased by the City of Glasgow for approximately £8600 (~1 million today). The Glasgow District Lunacy Board were to turn it into an asylum for the mentally ill, and Gartloch Hospital would open in 1896.

In the early 1900s, a tuberculosis sanitorium was opened.

During World War II, Gartloch was temporarily transformed into an Emergency Medical Services Hospital; the psychiatric patients were transferred and housed in other hospitals. After the war, the tuberculosis sanitorium was shut.

Gartloch would fall into the hands of a different board (Board of Management for Glasgow North-Eastern Mental Hospitals), after joining the NHS in 1948.

Although there were 830 beds in 1904, by 1990 there were apparently only 530 - this being just under the amount available when it first opened.

In its last few years, Gartloch would fall under the Greater Glasgow Community and Mental Health Services NHS Trust. In 1996, the hospital officially closed, and was essentially abandoned, until 2003, when plans to turn Gartloch into a village began.

Now, there is a village, "Gartloch Village", surrounding the hospital. The main body, the iconic front we see in Donna Franceschild's TOTA, standing derelict and with boarded windows.

Oh, it's also apparently haunted, according to two nurses.

What was the hospital like?

I've nabbed these (like most of the other information - although I cross-referenced the rest (such as the years) from wikipedia and some other archives) from this article on hiddenglasgow.com.

I was born and lived at 2280 Gartloch Rd (East Cottages) of Gartloch Hospital. My Father, Bill Milne was the Bacteriologist at Gartloch Hospital Laboratory. My Mother was Helen and was the hospital hairdresser. My memories of Gartloch are the most wonderful memories ever. We had the most perfect childhood. The children of employees were involved in lots of differant ways. I remember especially the farm. Our house looked onto the busy fields and the Bishop Loch. We spent many happy summers pickinf tatties with the patients. And in the long cold winters, skating on the Bishop Loch. Christmad parties in the hospital involved all the staff, their children and patients. We got to know many of the patients who had been there most of their lives. Some had been admitted the the unit because of ''having a child out of wedlock'' I have so many stories to tell this page is not big enough! I would love to hear from anyone who remembers Gartloch or who lived/worked there.

Pattie Milne [04/02/2004]

I was talking with my gran t'other night about Gartloch (her maw died in there!) and she remembers these two women that used to walk about when she went visiting. One of them was about 4 foot nothing and the other about 6 foot. They walked up and down the hall, not saying a word to each other, but every now and then the taller one would repeatedly slap the little one on the head (that story seemed funnier when my gran told it!).

Crusty [30/01/2004]

There are a few more interesting stories on the linked article, so if you're interested, I recommend you check them out.

Finally: Takin' Over the Asylum (and other pop culture)

Takin' Over the Asylum aired on the 27th of September, 1994. The six-part drama was filmed in a disused wing of Gartloch, while the hospital was still open and functional. The hospital would close only 2 years after the airing of the show.

Gartloch's iconic, gothic towers would play a key role in the show, and be instantly recognisable to any viewer of TOTA.

Although it shut down in 1996, TOTA would not be the only media produced about the hospital. Wikipedia states that a film was produced in 2005, named (appropriately) "Gartloch Hospital", that covered the history of the hospital. This film went on to win an award in 2007, at the Scottish Mental Health Art and Film Festival, for "Best Factual Film".

Although hidden away, Gartloch hospital has an undeniably interesting history. Personal accounts from the hospital seem to paint it as a fun place, where patients and staff seemed to get along. Knowing the horrors of early mental health treatment, and the abuse many would suffer in these sort of places, we can only hope that these accounts are true and create an accurate image of life surrounding the hospital.

And I wrote all this because I really like David Tennant. Good night

Note the decorative peaks on the towers - they are absent from the rest of the photos. They were reportedly removed in the late 1930's.

SOURCES

Very interesting archive that goes into the history of Gartloch: (link) (source of above images)

Timeline and personal memories: (link)

Overview: Wikipedia (gartloch, Takin' Over the Asylum)

[creature-wizard]

The Illuminati Formula Used To Create An Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave is reaching new heights in silly.

They're claiming that the Illuminati creates alters with Illuminati sensibilities in Good Christian Citizens, so that said alters can effectively serve as "super spies" to spy on the Christians and tell the Illuminati what the Christians are up to:

The proper training of a person for this role would be long and tedious, but once he was trained, you would have a super spy compared to which any creation in a mystery story is just plain weak. This is what the Illuminati have done. They create good Christian fronts, with Illuminati dark alters who can see what the Christians are doing.

Hmmm... a long and tedious process, you say? Hmm, imagine if there were easier ways to get this information... like reading Christian publications, listening to Christian radio, watching Christian television, visiting Christian websites, or just attending church services... it's not like these people just blast their agendas to anyone who'll listen 24/7 or anything...

The fact that there are people vain enough to think that there are secret conspiratorial cults going to all this work to do all of this unnecessary spying is kinda funny, IMO. Christofascists are some of the most self-absorbed fuckers on the planet.

Later, Cisco Wheeler cites the lyrics from "Music of the Night" from Phantom of the Opera as an example of a "hypnotic script." Yeah, it wasn't like, a song written for a character who was canonically supposed to be creepy or weird or anything.

Seriously though, this is a great example of how conspiracy theorists ruin art. Anything that's a little weird or uncomfortable to them must be some sort of evil programming. God forbid they have to understand things like context and artistic intent and shit like that.

Next is a list of things that supposedly keep a child's mind dissociative. One item on the list is spending fifteen minutes a day writing backwards, an obvious mutation of the old "witches recite the Lord's Prayer" canard. Because writing backwards doesn't cause dissociation. You just learn to write backwards.

And the rest is pretty typical torture stuff; many of which genuinely happen in actual child abuse cases, but in the context of the conspiracy theory are given special significance, because... shitty parents don't just abuse their kids for no reason, I guess.

And the book claims that Billy Graham was a Monarch handler. I really have no idea why conspiracists have singled him out among all the other celebrity preachers of the time, lemme go look at his Wikipedia page...

...Oh well he wasn't a total dick; he refused to glue himself to the Moral Majority or the GOP, pushed for military disarmament and AIDS support; yeah, that might have something to do with it.

Oh hey it's that Saturn worship thing (links to antisemitic conspiracy theories) with extra antisemitism by linking the Anti-Christ to Kabbalah:

The AntiChrist is also known as Black Saturn, and other names. Satan himself is known within a Monarch system often by the name Bilair, Bilar, or Bilid which are his cabalistic names.

Conflation of "the occult" with Wicca:

In the occult world, goddesses are triune: maiden, mother and crone. The one to the left of center is Midnight (the Mother figure), and the other is Morning Star (the maiden). Morning Star (Stella Matutina) may be a very young alter, rather than a teenager.

If you think this is bad, shit's about to get much, much worse.

So first of all, the book claims that The Wizard of Oz is an Illuminati thing, and has something to do with ancient Isis mystery religion:

One of the secrets of the Mystery Religions, especially the Egyptian Isis mystery religion was the ability to use drugs and torture to create multiple personalities. The word Oz is known to have been used by its author as an abbreviation for Osirus.

And then.

And then.

There's THIS fucking whopper:

The Grimm brothers, who were cabalistic jews, gathered the folk occult stories together. Their stories are full of spells, trances, and drugs. Sleeping Beauty is put to sleep, and the trigger to wake her is a kiss on the lips. These are serious hints that the occult world didn't stop programming people with dissociative states and triggers when the ancient Egyptian empires fell. Instead of using modern lingo such as "hypnotize", they would say "cast a spell."

The Grimm Brothers? Jews? Of ANY kind? Holy shit, you'll just pull anything out of your asses, won't you?

By the way, pinning the conspiratorial blame on Kabbalistic Jews specifically is how a lot of the conspiracy theories Nazi Germany believed in were made palatable for American gentiles post-WWII. Most Christians would agree that full-out mass slaughter was a little unfair. Many Christians could agree, though, that everyday Jews were perfectly fine people; they just needed to accept Jesus. And believing that it's just those Kabbalistic Jews who are the problem doesn't feel as hateful as all that Nazi shit. Must be totally different, right?

Nah.

Rehabbed conspiracy crap is still crap.

[emon-khalid]

The Evolution of Web 2.0

The Evolution of Web 2.0: Transforming the Internet Experience

The internet has come a long way since its inception, and one of the most significant milestones in its evolution is Web 2.0. This term, first coined in the early 2000s, represents the shift from static web pages to dynamic, user-driven platforms. With the rise of social media, user-generated content, and interactive online services, Web 2.0 has revolutionized the way we connect, communicate, and create.

What is Web 2.0?

In simple terms, Web 2.0 refers to the transformation of the web into a more interactive and collaborative space. Unlike its predecessor, Web 1.0, which primarily consisted of static websites where users could only consume content, Web 2.0 allows users to actively participate in the creation and sharing of information. This paradigm shift has led to the rise of social networks, blogs, wikis, and other platforms that encourage collaboration and community building.

Key Features of Web 2.0:

User-Generated Content: Platforms like YouTube, Twitter, and Wikipedia have made it easier than ever for users to create and share their own content, whether it's videos, articles, or social media posts.

Social Networking: Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn are prime examples of Web 2.0's emphasis on building online communities where people can connect, share experiences, and collaborate.

Interactive Interfaces: Technologies like AJAX and APIs enable more dynamic, responsive web pages that allow real-time updates without refreshing the page. This has greatly enhanced the user experience, particularly on social media platforms.

Rich User Experiences: Web 2.0 applications are designed with the user in mind, making it easy to navigate, interact with, and personalize their online experiences.

The Impact of Web 2.0 on Digital Culture

Web 2.0 has empowered individuals to have a voice in the digital world. Blogs, forums, and social media platforms have democratized content creation, giving anyone with an internet connection the ability to publish their thoughts, ideas, and creations to a global audience.

For businesses, this shift has created new opportunities for engagement with consumers. Brands are now able to interact with customers directly through social media platforms, fostering a sense of community and loyalty.

Moreover, the rise of influencers and content creators on platforms like YouTube and Instagram has changed the landscape of marketing. People trust recommendations from peers and influencers more than traditional advertising, and brands have quickly adapted to this new form of communication.

What’s Next After Web 2.0?

As technology continues to advance, discussions around the next phase of the web—often referred to as Web 3.0—have begun. While Web 2.0 focuses on user interaction and community-driven content, Web 3.0 promises to take things even further by incorporating artificial intelligence, machine learning, and decentralized technologies like blockchain. In this new era, the web could become even more personalized, secure, and user-centric.

Conclusion

Web 2.0 has truly transformed the way we interact with the internet, bringing about an age of collaboration, connection, and creativity. As we look forward to the future, it's exciting to imagine how the web will continue to evolve and shape our digital experiences.

What are your thoughts on the future of the web? Share in the comments below!

For more details on the history and significance of Web 2.0, check out these sources:

The History of Web 2.0

Understanding Web 2.0 Concept

[customized3dprinting]

Wikipedia Page Creation services also assist with reputation management. Over 460 million people visit Wikipedia and rely on the information posted on it. Wikipedia has become the Internet Encyclopedia of today’s age. If all is well, the page will be allowed to be published on the Wikipedia site. Create, add or modify content. Of course, there are moderators who will monitor the content posted.