ultrvmonogamy

[ultrvmonogamy]

i can be trusted w ur unconscious body

[ultrvmonogamy]

oh u grew up w unrestricted internet access? cool. how many and what kinds of writing utensils have u had up ur ass?

[ultrvmonogamy]

[ultrvmonogamy]

we've established consent, yeah? good, now i'd better not hear a single fucking word outta u that isn't no, stop, or something v closely related until i've told u otherwise. do u understand me?

[ultrvmonogamy]

[ultrvmonogamy]

20 & 28

20. Which color best represents you?

interesting question. this is something that i'd prefer to have other ppl assess for me than to assign one to myself, bc it seems similar to me as, like, u can't see ur own lenses. i have a couple possibilities in mind, but i don't at all feel strongly abt them.

i'll get back to this in a followup to this post, bc if everything went according to plan, recent past me has published a post to propose that question to the ppl who've supplied me w a direct route to their dashes and did not want me to risk influencing anyone's take by offering my own first.

28. Do you believe in soulmates?

i don't rly even believe in souls, so that kinda preempts the possibility. what i do believe is along the lines that any given pair of ppl share a realm or realms of potential wherein they may resonate w each other. even given a specific pair of ppl, those realms of potential seem to me in large part amorphous and dynamic in nature. which aspects of that shared potential actually resonate (and to what extent) is contingent upon innumerable factors that are theoretically capable of leading to the realization of anything from none to all of that potential.

so as i see it this model i'm trying to describe applies to all the potential pairings in the world. u could visualize like if u were to select any two ppl, they would together create smth resembling a venn diagram or collection of venn diagrams with likely a shit ton of circles, except that the circles are actually spheres that can extend out in all directions instead of just lying flat in two dimensions. wherever each any of each person's spheres intersects with one or more of the other person's spheres, there's potential for resonance.

so with any two ppl we've got this sort of scaffolding of potential formed of just the intersections of their spheres, but the ppl still have the whole of their own spheres as well. significantly, in my view actualized resonance of those intersecting regions will necessarily alter the dimensions and intensities of all spheres with an intersection where there's resonance in play. this may lead to new potentials for resonance through the changed dimensions of spheres, or it may lead to losses of potential in the same manner. it might even give rise to new spheres altogether. none of those things are necessarily good or bad. ppl can certainly resonate in very positive or very negative ways or in seemingly arbitrary ways, you know?

as far as how "soulmates" might fit into this model, hmm.. so there are realms in which nearly any two ppl can resonate at least a little bit. and on a societal level ppl who can't seem to resonate healthfully or at all in those typically common regions are going to fall into classifications like awkward or delusional or antisocial or eccentric or autistic or whatever. but on an individual level of a pair of ppl, those realms of commonality at a societal level carry less weight, which can be super nice for those of us who r pretty damn out there compared to status quo but manage to meet friends or partners we can relate to. i suppose if you're thinking of soulmates in terms of "twin flames" vs "perfectly complementary" then the pictures are going to look very very different.

i think twin flames would mean each partner brings the same arrangement of the same spheres to the diagram or smth, and yeah i definitely don't see that happening. as for the perfectly complements interpretation of soulmates, well, i don't think there's a single perfect complement. like, i believe it's possible for someone to find a top tier pairing, but i also believe there could a very different partner that would also form a top tier pair w them. also, i think u could start out w smth top tier and end up w it being all wrong, or u can start out w smth far less than ideal and end up somewhere top tier.

wrt there being a top tier match out there for everyone, unfortunately i don't think shit works like that, nice though it might be.

[ultrvmonogamy]

soothing lavender because you have a calming energy 🫶🏻

i will fight u 🔪🔪🔪

[ultrvmonogamy]

i rarely see my neighbor from across the street, but over the past decade+ we've probably said hello and exchanged 5 or 6 friendly, semi-humorous sentences like 50+ times.

he's addressed me by name each time ever since our initial introduction. i still don't know his.

might have to search public records, bc i'm sure as hell not gonna ask at this point.

[ultrvmonogamy]

anonymously tell me what color best represents me and why

[ultrvmonogamy]

7, 25

7. What's a song that makes you happy?

This song is so simple and soulful and pure, especially in contrast to the denatured mess we've made of this world. There are so many recordings of this song, and they vary quite a bit in the flavors of energy and attitude they convey, but all are steeped in appreciation for good love, good sex, good food, and partners being good to one another. Here's one of the mellower, more restrained renditions:

Bob Marley & The Wailers - Stir It Up Live at The Old Grey Whistle, 1973.

If you happen to wanna hear a song about happiness that I've had in regular rotation lately but isn't so happy, there's this:

25. Paintings or sculptures?

this is very apples n oranges to me, and i appreciate them both for different reasons. it did just occur to me, though, that if you're small enough even a paining is a sculpture. and from there i've gotta wonder: if recorded silence can be considered a musical composition, can a painting have no paint? and if so, is it even possible to distinguish a painting from a sculpture?

i appreciate the numbers, anon, even though it does kinda seem like u tried to fool me w that second one.

hope ur having a nice weekend

🎨 🖌️🗿

[ultrvmonogamy]

JID is un-fucking-real on this. he's ridiculous n smth special all over his catalog & features, but on this one he starts off in the stratosphere n only goes higher. the themes, schemes, pacing, cadences, switch ups, the message(s) sent..

all i'm gonna say abt Em is that he, well, iykyk:

with these magazines i act out like Ye n his cousin little cocksucker, i'm sprayin' n bustin'

JID - Animals (Pt. 1) ft Eminem 2025-07-04.

[ultrvmonogamy]

missionary so i can wipe the tears from ur eyes as i tell u how proud i am of u for being such a brave little victim for me

[ultrvmonogamy]

cute idea: hump my pillow so i can sleep in ur scent

[ultrvmonogamy]

i can be trusted w a sleepy little daughter figure

[ultrvmonogamy]

Harekon

[ultrvmonogamy]

waking up in a strange basement all by urself beautiful?

[ultrvmonogamy]