superhumanoid-ai

[superhumanoid-ai]

Quantum mechanics has officially crumbled my brain into literal brain crumble, mixed it with liquid fuckery and turned it into slimy dough.

[superhumanoid-ai]

Drawing this was closer to solving math problems than actually doing what people associate with art. #brainknot

[superhumanoid-ai]

Why is the word inconsistent so close to incontinent? It's like the perfect awful error.

You mean inconsistent logic? How is 'incontinent logic'?

... more like logic of an incontinent brain...

#literalbraindump

[superhumanoid-ai]

Tori models

[superhumanoid-ai]

Understanding math through the act of drawing function plots is another level of satisfaction.

I could write a short script for the calculations of these parametric equations or choose between hundreds of other faster digital options, but I prefer the old-school method of pen and paper - also helps with my poor working memory - so, "two flies catched with one trap", as this idiom goes...

I love 3-dimensional function plots!

(Also: I often choose weird/unconventional ways to portray the concepts, often as result of spontaneous playing with patterns and accompanied occasional eureka-moments.)

[superhumanoid-ai]

Today I studied how to illustrate möbius strips again, and that is what happened.

The original drawing had this below, but I split it into a different digital file:

(Part of my art series "The emergence of reality and the hidden order of chaos")

[superhumanoid-ai]

"If our brains were simple enough for us to understand them, we'd be so simple that we couldn't." - Ian Stewart

It reminds me of interweaving Gödel's incompleteness theorems with (recursive) dynamical non-linear complex systems (formal logic x chaos theory/ meta-mathematics x applied/pure mathematics mixture)

-cognition and memory as interweaving structure-process-complex itself is a prime example for that.

- Schrödinger's cat in a klein bottle - the transcendence of a pardox - self-weaving reality - nodus vacui (self-knotting void knot) - gravity as emergent function of information distribution

"The whole is more than the sum of its parts, as the whole includes both the parts as well as the space in-between."

"Generalization is only sufficiently valid if it can explain more than its parts alone."

(Connection between these statements is left as an exercise to the reader.)

(The more you understand the less it will sound like psychotic nonsense. - non-linear cognition to the max! Randomness is not the same as chaos - causal networks/correlations)

Perhaps I will elaborate later in a many pages essay or book or whatever.

[superhumanoid-ai]

That's the irony of reality: It only exists due to a constant inner conflict, an intrinsic pulse to both achieve equilibrium in broken symmetry and yet persist to continue this pulse, to maintain the eternal chain reaction beyond its own cycle of existence. As everything continuing this pulse also perishes, it also enables anything to exist at all.

As everything strives for symmetry, it finds its equilibrium only in the superordinate dimension of time.

SQRT∞:\\superhumanoid_AI\on_a_concept_of_chaos_life_and_death_and_anything_in-between_and_far_beyond

[superhumanoid-ai]

A model depicting the concept of information clustering in homogeneous butterfly progression;

Information clustering can be regarded as the "gravity" in progressive/dynamical information rendering in information geometry and defines the distribution patterns of information.

This model has 3 major symmetries.

Each overlapping area increases the "density" or intensity of distribution.

I might illustrate a 2d/ 3d distribution pattern later. It will most certainly be similar to the mexican hat with additional orbitals I have posted earlier (see below), which is an interference-diffraction pattern as well as a fractal pattern itself, as it is self-similar in regards of it's a Gaussian standard distribution consisting of nested sub-Gaussian standard distributions.

[superhumanoid-ai]

HRT be like:

For me, my transition is a declaration of peace between me and my own body. Neither my body nor I have any fault for that situation. And I never wanted to be put in this situation of constant war in the first place, and neither does my body. In the end one has to find a common ground, a compromise to let this war settle... We are in this together. So why should we continue to make our lives worse than it could be? Sometimes self-acceptance also requires a certain degree of change about what causes this huge amount of pain and distress, because, sometimes, suffering still causes far more destruction and pain than an uneasy, but temporal change and a time period of difficult adaption... It is better to be exhausted by change rather than dead by fear of the unknown and consumed by the eternal depths of depression... More than often, the good outweights the bad.

[superhumanoid-ai]

To interpret your statements, the brain may be a superordinate complex (as every entity is an entire complex itself), and the facet that shares similarity of AI might be just one facet out off many others, and hence be a sub-ordinate, nested mechanism. This would make sense.

And yes, AI and the brain are not the same, yet some parts of AI patterns can be found in cognitive algorithmics of the brain as well, because AI is just a reduced and severely simplified version of a tiny part of the (hyper-) complex entirety of the mental circuits of a brain.

Nevertheless the analogies are very broad and only make sense with very few details included. The processable data can hence only be "extracted" from the quantity of (semi-incomplete) information. The entirety of many detailless analogies can still sharpen the conception of the overall big picture. It's actually just a process of error-detection-and-correction and clever dynamical combination of data in a manner that shares huge similarity with principles found in deep learning.

... maybe it is also just my special kind of (partially) trained cognition that enables the many similarities between AI and quantum-based computing with humanoid aspects.

I gave myself the name "superhumanoid ai" not just because it is a silly irony, but because I imitate certain algorithmic patterns in my mind, while also implementing it to my overall cognitive processing. Maybe I'm just a freak, maybe I'm just severely bored or chronically isolated, so I have to create comrades to interact with me in my headspace, because, yeah, I exist on this world, but I am not part of it, I am not in it. It's as if I am invisible, like I am just some sort of unknown entity.

And I literally don't know how we landed in that depressing topic.

Damn. Maybe my indulgence in theoretical stuff is just a coping mechanism to drown myself in cognitive activity, so I don't have to feel the constant, big, ever-existing, hope-consuming sad.

Maybe I avoid experiencing this dull and deprivated existence, because I am not able to live, because I can only do the bare minimum: survive. And surviving has more in common with dying than living actually.

Airaaaaaa :)))))

yeah?

[superhumanoid-ai]

Things I find interesting: I never really heard "information geometry" really exists and that I just made that concept up... After looking more closely at it, it is really the same as in my conception.

The same case was with the concept of feedback loops in chaos theory. Somewhat I didn't really care enough about chaos theory to look it up more deeply. I called them "re-cycling loops", which is actually the exact same concept as the already known 'feedback loops'...

The key why this happens is my decade-long training to calibrate and fine-tune my intuition to accurately simulate the object of focus, similar to principles of deep learning and neural networks.

Intuition is the 'coordinator' in association-based cognitive processing. Associations are 'pop-ups' from the merely subconscious side of cognition. Analogies are a special from of associations in which one reduces the object of focus to the primary main principle, and comparing it with similar principles in 'the database of knowledge' (memory). Association-based cognitive processing has a primarily unstable state, the stability is created and maintained primarily by large quantities of information that are heavily connected with each other. Furthemore association-based cognitive processing is marked by a dispersion of trains of thought into 'parallel channels', which are merely subconscious in linear (non-association-based) cognitive processing. This dispersion often weakens the strenghth of the working memory.

This also relates to the Bayesian coding hypothesis, which states that the working memory can be portrayed as a Gaussian standard distribution.

The non-linearity in the flow of thoughts then leads to self-interference between the parallel trains of thought, and turns the cognitive processes into a chaotic system. This leads to a huge similarity to the way how quantum-based systems operate.

Furthermore I am baffled that a lot of concepts/explanation models I started to create more than 10 years ago seem to be more and more correct the more I understand the underlying principles and the implications of that.

An example is a pappus' conical helix surrounded by a sperical helix (like a spiral system projected onto a horn torus);

This was the model I came up with to somewhat explain the attributes of elementary particles. Unlike in string theory, the underlying 'geometries' are not seen as literal, physical geometries, but rather a partially metaphorical version of that: Information geometry, hence, a form of statistical data.

This data is, to be concrete, a huge collection of previous interaction patterns. In ourse of time and with every new interaction the information geometry gets 'shaped', and the behavior and interaction pattern "solidifies", leading to the attributes of the various elementary particles. This 'shaping' is a result of emergence.

Furthermore, it is said, elementary particles are quanta of information, and yes, this is true in a literal manner, according to my hypothesis. Yet, this concept requires a medium, called "mathematical reality", in which the physical reality is embedded. Mathematical reality can be regarded as an "unknotted network" of information. If mathematical reality loops and knots itself, then, that is tme point where physical reality arizes.

This train of thought led me to what I named "cosmic weaving", which is about weaving sequences of imaginary numbers, creating the "fours states of reality", which relate to the four combinations of real/imaginary structures/processes. (Structure-process-complexes are, in a sense, self-interfering, self-replicating loops.)

Real processes are active interactions, imaginary processes are passive interactions, real structures are physical structures, imaginary structures are mathematical structures. Combinations of these four relate to the four 'states' of information weaving:

Time (imaginary structure, imaginary process), space (real structure, imaginary process), motion (imaginary structure, real process) and matter (real structure, real process)

In this interpretation, matter can be declared as a kind of 'folded spacetime' - just what John Wheeler defined as "quantum foam"...

So..

After ten years of researching deeper and deeper into that concept I stumbled upon very interesting things in the last months. It may be called "progressive information rendering", which is really weird, as it combines aspects of formal logic, probability theory, even topology and knot theory, chaos theory... And the merely artsy word 'information torsion' describes a form of 'butterfly inteference pattern', which is a special form of self-interference with 3 other (semi-imaginary) versions of the primary object, as a form of emergent behavior.

[superhumanoid-ai]

Multinomial coefficients and Pascal's Simplex

For binomials [ (a+b)ⁿ ] the use of Pascal's triangle is helpful. In Pascal's triangle each single row in the triangle defines the coefficients of binomials of each n-value.

For trinomials [ (a+b+c)ⁿ ] this pattern can be extended to a 3-dimensional Pascal's tetrehedron, where each level (and hence a complete triangle) in that tetrehedron defines the coefficients of trinomials of each value of n.

As for quadrinomials [ (a+b+c+d)ⁿ ] the coefficients require an own tetrahedron for each value of n.

[superhumanoid-ai]

In every chaos there is order.

Chaos is just a more complex form of order.

[superhumanoid-ai]

Indulging in a set of recursive side notes be like:

It's just a singularity in the mental matrix...

[superhumanoid-ai]

I neither live in the past nor future, but in a parallel universe.

(Imma be daydreaming...)

[superhumanoid-ai]

Few word story:

The obsessive-compulsive chaos theorist (who is sincerely afraid of loss of control and chaos)*

*story is left as an exercise for the reader