#AI-generated content checker

[aidesklib]

Uncover the Truth with Desklib’s AI Content Detector

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, ensuring the authenticity of written content is more important than ever. Whether you're a student, educator, content creator, or professional, being able to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated content has become a necessity. That's where Desklib’s advanced AI Content Detector comes into play.

Why Choose Desklib’s AI Content Detection Tool?

Desklib’s AI Content Detector is designed to help you verify originality and maintain credibility in any form of written material. Here’s why it stands out:

1. Accurate AI Content Detection

Our tool uses cutting-edge technology to identify AI-written content with precision. It can detect text generated by popular AI writing tools, ensuring that your work remains authentic and free from potential plagiarism.

2. Comprehensive Plagiarism Checker

Desklib’s AI-powered plagiarism checker goes beyond traditional methods. It not only checks for duplicate content across the web but also detects AI-generated text patterns, providing you with an in-depth originality report.

3. User-Friendly Interface

With an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, Desklib’s AI detection tool is accessible to everyone. Upload your document, and within seconds, get a detailed analysis of your content.

4. Trusted by Professionals

Whether you’re a teacher evaluating student assignments or a content creator ensuring the originality of your blog posts, Desklib’s tool is trusted by professionals worldwide to maintain the highest standards of authenticity.

5. AI Detection for All Content Types

From academic papers and essays to blogs, articles, and marketing copy, Desklib’s tool caters to a wide range of content formats. No matter your industry, we’ve got you covered.

Features That Set Us Apart

Real-Time Analysis: Get instant results with actionable insights.

Multi-Language Support: Detect AI content in multiple languages, expanding your global reach.

Secure and Confidential: Your data’s privacy is our priority. We never store or share your content.

Detailed Originality Reports: Receive comprehensive reports that highlight areas of concern, making it easier for you to make necessary edits.

How Does the AI Detection Tool Work?

Using Desklib’s AI Content Detector is simple:

Upload Your Document: Drag and drop your file or paste the text directly into our tool.

Run the Analysis: Click on the "Analyze" button to begin the detection process.

Review the Report: Within moments, view a detailed breakdown of AI-generated content, plagiarism matches, and originality scores.

Who Can Benefit from Desklib’s AI Content Detector?

Students and Educators: Ensure academic integrity by identifying AI-generated essays and assignments.

Writers and Editors: Maintain originality in blogs, articles, and other creative works.

Businesses and Marketers: Verify that your promotional content is unique and trustworthy.

Researchers: Ensure that academic papers meet originality standards for publication.

Enhance Your Content Authenticity Today

Don’t let AI-generated text compromise your credibility. Desklib’s AI Content Detector empowers you to identify and eliminate AI-written content, ensuring that your work stands out for its authenticity and originality.

Visit Desklib AI Content Detector now and experience the power of next-gen AI detection technology.

[lies-unfurl]

idk if there's actually been an uptick in AI generated fics since CA:BNW came out, or if I'm just noticing it more since people have been talking about it, but. weird and a bit demoralizing that even on the one site where you absolutely cannot monetize your "content," people are still putting out this slop.

[zerogptdetector3]

AI-Generated Content Checker – Free Online Tool | ZeroGPT

The AI Generated Content Checker by ZeroGPT helps you detect if text was created using AI. Paste any content and get instant results showing if it’s human or AI-written. This tool is perfect for teachers, content creators, and editors who need fast, reliable answers. It’s free to use, accurate, and easy for anyone. Keep your writing authentic—use ZeroGPT’s AI-Generated Content Checker now.

[zerogpt262]

AI Generated Content Checker: Uncover AI-Written Text Instantly

ZeroGPT’s AI Generated Content Checker helps you verify whether text is written by AI. With its state-of-the-art detection capabilities, this tool is perfect for educators, students, and professionals. Analyze essays, articles, and reports with confidence, knowing ZeroGPT delivers accurate results every time. Its free and easy-to-use platform ensures quick access to powerful AI detection technology. Protect your work from plagiarism concerns and uphold originality with this essential tool. Start using ZeroGPT’s AI Generated Content Checker today at ZeroGPT and experience effortless content verification.

[insightfultrends]

Boost Your Blog with AI: The Ultimate Tool Guide

Supercharge Your Blogging with AI: A Guide to the Best Tools Blogging can be time-consuming, but AI is changing the game. From generating content to optimizing SEO and creating stunning visuals, AI tools can help you streamline your workflow and produce better content faster. This guide will explore some of the best AI tools for bloggers and how you can use them to take your blog to the next…

[zerogpt0]

AI Detected | Zero GPT

Trust Zero GPT for ai detected. Our advanced technology excels at detecting and preventing AI-generated content, setting the standard for content integrity and authenticity in digital spaces.

[etaleah]

I think a lot about the fact that the real genius of Hbomberguy’s plagiarism video was not just the exposé aspect of it but the fact that it so effectively demonstrated WHY plagiarism is bad.

When teachers warned against plagiarism in school, they made it seem like the reason it was bad was because it got you out of doing work. Plagiarism was bad because it was lazy. And that is (1) not a very strong deterrent to students who are only taking this class and writing this paper because they’re forced to and therefore don’t care about the work, and (2) missing the real harm behind the action.

On some level, yeah, plagiarism is bad because it will prevent you from learning how to write well on your own. There’s a real fear that a generation of kids won’t know how to write (which means they won’t know how to think) because they’ll be so used to having an “AI” machine do it for them that they’ll be helpless without it. That is very much a concern. But it’s far from the only issue. Harry laid out the other problems really well:

1. Plagiarism is enshittification. When you have to reword stuff to hide that you’re stealing it, the writing will be clunkier, wordier, more awkward, and less natural-sounding. This makes the piece worse, which isn’t good for anyone. Who needs more bad writing in the world?

2. Plagiarism spreads misinformation. Again, stealing stuff usually requires having to reword things to get around plagiarism checkers. That can make it very easy to (accidentally or purposely) rewrite a sentence to now be false instead of true. This is made worse by the fact that hiding the source of the information makes fact-checking impossible.

3. Plagiarism is anti-educational. If the audience doesn’t know where something came from, they can’t go visit that source to learn more about the topic. They’re prevented from finding any additional knowledge, which makes research—and therefore progress—difficult.

4. Plagiarism makes it impossible for creators to earn a living, thereby making it impossible to create. Funnily enough, this means less material for plagiarists to steal from, so the whole scam is really just a snake eating its own tail. Like all scams, it can’t last long. When plagiarists can make huge profits by stealing and putting out content faster because they’re stealing, the real creators who actually do the work have no chance. They can’t compete because they can’t create as fast as a plagiarist can steal. So they don’t make as much money, which means they can’t live off their work, which in turn means they can’t create anymore. This keeps going until all that’s left is stolen garbage.

There’s a lot to love about that video, but this part in particular is my favorite by far.

[zerogpt11]

Detect ai generated text for Free, simple way & High accuracy. Ai content check, ai content detection tool, ai essay detector for teacher.

[zerogpt12]

Our AI detector tool uses DeepAnalyse™ Technology to identify the origin of your text. Our experiments are still ongoing, and our aim is to analyze more articles and text. 

[desklibai]

Stay Ahead with Desklib’s Free AI Detection Tool – Your Secret Weapon for Authentic Writing

In a world where artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly embedded in our daily writing tasks, distinguishing between human and machine-generated content has become a challenge. Whether you're a student, academician, or content creator, ensuring your work is original and free from AI influence is essential.

That’s where Desklib steps in with its powerful AI content detection tool—designed to help users confidently detect AI-written content and maintain integrity across all forms of written communication.

Why You Need an AI-Generated Content Checker

With platforms like ChatGPT, Jasper, and other AI writers gaining popularity, it's easy for content to slip through unnoticed as AI-generated. But when it comes to academics, publishing, or professional writing, passing off AI-written material as your own can have serious consequences—from plagiarism accusations to reputational damage.

This is where Desklib’s AI text detector becomes invaluable. It acts as both an AI plagiarism checker and an originality checker, offering peace of mind that your work is truly yours—or helping you verify the authenticity of someone else’s.

How Desklib’s AI Detection Tool Works

Using Desklib’s AI detection tool is simple and fast:

Upload your document – whether it's an essay, research paper, blog post, or report.

Let the system analyze your text using advanced algorithms.

Receive a clear, downloadable report showing the percentage of AI-generated content in your file.

What sets Desklib apart is its chunking method —it breaks down text into overlapping segments to better understand context and generate more accurate results. This ensures even the most subtle signs of AI involvement don’t go unnoticed.

Features That Make Desklib Stand Out

Free to Use: No hidden charges or subscription fees.

Supports Long Documents: Check papers up to 20,000 words long.

Multiple Detection Modes: Choose from Section Wise, Paragraph Wise, or Full Text analysis.

Private & Secure: Files are deleted after analysis—no data stored.

Who Can Benefit?

Desklib’s AI-generated content checker is ideal for:

Students: Ensure your assignments are 100% original.

Educators: Quickly screen student submissions for AI use.

Writers & Bloggers: Verify your content before publication.

Professionals: Confirm the authenticity of business reports or proposals.

Final Thoughts

As AI continues to reshape how we write, tools like Desklib’s AI content detection service are not just helpful—they’re essential. Whether you're creating content or reviewing it, having access to a reliable AI detection tool helps preserve the value of original thought and creativity.

Ready to Test Your Content?

Visit https://desklib.com/ai-content-detector/ today and start checking your documents for AI-generated content—completely free and in seconds!

[sibylance]

We Need to Talk About AI Detectors

Over the past few weeks there have been two posts in particular that have come out against two authors in the community that have resulted in near witch hunts for one, and essentially driving the other off the internet from all the bullying and hate received. These posts were related to the potential use of AI in fanfiction, as well as using supposed “AI Detectors” to support their claims. With the help of friends, we have been able to look into the AI claims that were made against both The Silence and The Song and Ir Abelas, Da’ean.

We were curious about how and why these posts were being flagged with high levels of “AI Probability” when the authors have been adamant (either in chats or in public) that they have never used generative AI for their work. So we did the most logical thing, put on our detective caps, and rolled up our sleeves. We would like to note that we do not wish to have philosophical discussions, we wish to have transparency and honesty.

Spoilers: We found inaccuracies almost IMMEDIATELY.

Firstly, we looked into the weakness of AI detectors, and read through online posts where people voiced their frustrations with detectors. One thing that we noticed was that the common denominator was that well written articles were being flagged as “Likely AI”, particularly with Originality, and that the solution was to either “dumb them down” or to remove punctuation such as commas, which immediately improved the score, tipping the scale to “Likely Original”.

For the second step, we ran some of our own works through Originality AI checker–works that were made prior to the creation of AI and generative AI. However, after punctuation was removed, this magically changed from 50% likelihood of AI to 100% original work. Again, these works were from before the dawn of generative AI, and therefore could not have been created by AI. For fun, we even ran the first chapter of Harry Potter through it–a novel that is objectively without AI, which still did not come out with results stating 100% original work. We then removed almost all of the punctuation from it, and it actually improved the originality score by 3% (from 95% to 98%).

Personal fic, before and after:

Next step, we ran our own scans through Originality and Quillbot.This includes full chapters of Ir Abelas, Da’ean, both with and without punctuation in Originality, and excerpts in Quillbot. Interestingly, the excerpts in Quillbot pinged as “0% likely AI”, and that is without any removal of punctuation. Across the board, the removal of punctuation from the chapters caused an immediate and dramatic increase in the score, from “100% likely AI” to “96% likely Original”. We have found that the more grammatically correct a work was, the more likely it was to be flagged as “AI”, much like how the freelance writers were complaining about.

Chapter 1 of Ir Abelas, before and after:

Chapter 1 through Quillbot:

Chapter 45 of Ir Abelas, before and after:

Chapter 45 without commas or double hyphens:

Chapter 45 through Quillbot:

Even the Ai detection websites caution against this:

To Durgeapologist, Fangbanger3000, and friends: If you do actually read this, I hope you realize that your posts have done more harm than good to the community. You are correct that AI is a potential threat to creative spaces, but you have gone about addressing it in the worst possible way. By creating multiple posts across platforms with the intent of creating a negative perspective toward certain authors and their fictions rather than the use of AI as a whole—not to mention the counter-accusations with personal attacks rather than focusing on the issue at hand—you are creating an environment that fosters negativity, bullying, and division—none of which are directions to take a sustainable and healthy community. AI Detection is the Wild West right now. There is no way to determine if something written is AI through the use of algorithms, and it requires the use of human intervention and careful comparison to previous works to be within a certain level of certainty that it is AI. Our hope is that in the future, you will take time, step back, and consider all possible sides before causing a stir in the community like this.

[leam1983]

Annoyances

Whenever I see a "if you like AI, pls die" post, a part of me wants to take a big, gigantic breath and blurt out the following, Wall of Text style:

Narrow AI is vital to several scientific fields and refers to algorithms that are geared towards the collection, classification and proper identification of datum. It doesn't steal, it doesn't crib from anyone else, but it certainly helps with overlaying false colours on CAT scans and MRI results, for example.

Narrow AI is in your spreadsheet documents. If a spreadsheet is based on a few formulae to keep track of your budget, some measure of AI is involved.

Narrow AI is your average spell-checker's brain, as well. Not Google's - Google Docs just outsources Gemini for some truly godawful proofreading - but your average offline, dumb-as-bricks spell checker qualifies as Narrow AI.

Narrow AI is in your GPS and in your phone's voice-activated commands. Remove it, and you'll have to lug maps around again, or run searches on your own.

When you excoriate someone for using an AI-based tool, you're referring to the more recent years' developments in the field of Wide AI - as in, generalist Artificial Intelligences. AI scientists the world over have all agreed that, by and large, the usefulness of Wide AI is limited.

Later evidence proves that even without the use of poisoning tools like Glaze, Wide AI is poisoning itself, all thanks to the excessive eagerness of content producers who see AI as a means to drive Search Engine Optimization. The Dead Internet Theory isn't quite proven yet; but what is is that AI-generated content is increasingly eating up its own generated slop. ChatGPT has, point in fact, already consumed every scrap of genuine human content there is to access.

So give props to your local neckbeard who wants to make sure we'll one day no longer need to remove someone's thyroid in the case of detected malignancies, because he's looking to use AI to save lives.

Artificial Intelligence isn't the problem, what is is the McDonald's-ized version of it that's being bandied about by publications like The Verge and TechCrunch.

[lastoneout]

It's also like super fucking infuriating to see people continue to argue that generative AI is the best way for disabled and/or poor people to make art because like, you know what helps make art more accessible? Giving poor and disabled people money.

Like take me for instance, I'm disabled. I get severe migraines and intense leg/back pain if I sit at my computer for too long, my hEDS makes holding pens and pencils hard, my ADHD makes it hard for me to start certain tasks and/or stop them before I potentially hurt myself, my neck also hurts if I look down too much, my dyslexia AND my ADHD both make it difficult to keep track of a story as I write and use correct spelling and grammar, plus, I need to prioritize taking care of myself and going to appointments and keeping my house clean and that takes up a lot of my free time. All of these things make creating the kind of art I want to create difficult if not occasionally impossible.

So what do you think would solve my problems better? Giving me money so that I can have a drawing tablet and desk chair that won't hurt my neck or back, another tablet + pen and a lap table and comfortable body pillows for drawing in bed, easier transportation to my doctors appointments, effective treatment for my chronic pain and migraines, the ability hire someone to help me keep my house clean, a spelling/grammar checker that isn't complete ass, and a therapist and psychatrist who can help me manage my ADHD better?

Or an AI program that takes my input and spits out a drawing or story made of stolen content glued together that, in the case of the art, I cannot meaningfully edit without starting over, which also destroys the environment in the process?

Seems pretty obvious to me. I don't need AI, I need help to manage the things that are actually stopping me from being able to write and draw.

Or take my mom. She's had severe rhumatoid arthritis since she was a small child, her hands are deformed and she relies on her wheelchair to get around. She doesn't need AI to help her paint, she needs special paint brushes she can actually hold, a table her wheelchair will fit at, and someone to help her with personal hygiene/keep her house clean/take her to doctors appointments so she actually has free time to paint.

Does that poor kid growing up in public housing with parents who are too poor to afford art classes or supplies or to send them to college really need a computer program to draw for them, or do they need support to help them take those classes, buy drawing supplies, and money so they can go to college.

Blind people can paint, deaf musicians exist, people with missing limbs find all sorts of ways to make art, people with parkinson's paint with typewriters, my mother can't hold a normal paintbrush and she makes some of the most beautiful watercolor paintings I've ever seen, Van Gogh had bipolar disorder and only sold like one painting when he was alive, I mean for real how many different artists have you heard of who's biographies start with them being born into poverty?

This is not meant to be inspiration porn, these people are just ones who were able to find ways to make art despite their struggles. They shouldn't have had to struggle at all, but god imagine how many more artisrs and writers we could have had if none of them had to overcome those struggles. It breaks my heart to think of all the wonderful art that never got to exist because no one helped the people who could have made it actually have the time, money, support, and safety they needed to make it. AI would not have saved them because making art isn't the problem, being disadvantaged is the problem. Living in a world that refuses to make room for you is the problem. Being fucking poor is the problem. Humans have always found ways to make art despite huge barriers, the solution isn't a computer that makes art for them, it's SUPPORT AND MONEY SO THEY CAN OVERCOME THOSE BARRIERS AND MAKE THEIR OWN ART.

As a last example: I love watching dancing and I would love to be able to dance, but I'm terrible at it(I got kicked off a dance team for not being able to learn the dance at all despite spending weeks on it, idk my brain wasn't made for dancing) and my disabled body makes it more pain than pleasure if not actively dangerous, anyway. Having a robot dressed to look like me dance next to me while I get to watch would not make me feel like I'm getting to dance. It would actually be extremely fucking demoralizing and frustrating. I would hate that!!

Having an AI spit out a painting or book would not make me feel like I got to paint or write a book. It's a fucking anamatronic doll running on stolen ideas and it will never be the same as getting to actually expirience the joy of creating art first hand. AI is not the solution. Helping people who need it is the solution. And I am CONSTANTLY pissed to think about all the time and money that goes into these fucking AI programs that would be better spent helping disabled and poor people get the help they need so they can make art themselves, all while the people running the nightmare plagiarism pollution machines pretend that their horrible inventions exist to help people like me.

[zerogpt262]

ZeroGPT: Reliable AI Text Checker for Authenticity Assurance

ZeroGPT's AI Text Checker offers comprehensive verification of ai generated content checker, safeguarding against plagiarism and ensuring the authenticity of content. With ZeroGPT, users can confidently verify the origin of text, maintaining integrity and originality in their writing projects. Trust ZeroGPT to deliver accurate and reliable results, empowering writers to create genuine and impactful content.

[formula-fun]

Your own work take me for a ride when uploaded in https://justdone.com has +90% AI traces you can just go around and blame people when you don’t know for sure? And all the AI discourse?? You are literally using AI to do this AI traces checks.

hello robot fan! for the sake of fair play i'm going to humor you and answer this like it's a genuine question even though it's probably coming from a place of resentment. you should meditate on that later btw

"your own work has 90%+ AI traces" - okay? and? justdone is a subscription based website that scans your work and then tries to get you to pay it to remove language that sounds like an ai wrote it. in order to do that it has to first tell you you are a robot. you can paste literally anything into justdone and it will claim there's ai in there and then try to sell you something to fix it, because that's how it makes money. here is a reddit thread on the topic. i'm sure if you put any of ginger's works through there it would tell you it's ai as well, so i'm not really sure what your point is. you can give it a ham sandwich and it will call it ai. thats kind of the point of justdone, which is why i didn't use it in the first place

the checker i used for ginger which said her work was 100% ai was this one. take me for a ride comes back with a whopping 0% on that one

"you are literally using ai to do this ai traces checks" - there's a difference between traditional ai and generative ai. one sucks the ocean dry and was trained using stolen content, and the other is a slightly stupid computer. the ones in checkers are generally the dummy ones (unless they're trying to sell you a genai service on the side, which is a different business model). i will note that a previous anon pointed out these sometimes use whatever you paste into them to train more genai, and while i haven't been able to confirm that copyleaks does that i've been wary of using it any more for that reason. which brings me to:

ginger was showing multiple signs she used ai, it wasn't just the checker. im going to assume you have a working brain and have read my previous posts about this because i don't want to rehash it for the 8th time here. it's on my blog. we don't solely rely on checkers or a single sign, a combination of signs identifies people who use ai and people who don't. again, i've been more than clear about this every time i've spoken about this issue, so i'm not sure why you're mad about the checkers when we pointed out multiple other signs that she was using ai, including the fact that she confirmed she used it for art. we use checkers in conjunction with other things, and ginger had about 8 different things proving she was using ai even without the checker. so, finally:

paper trails: i am a writer and i exist in a community of other writers. i talk to other people about my work. i first brought up a vague concept for take me for a ride with friends on discord just over a month ago. i also mentioned i was working on it on july 3rd on tumblr. i write in word, which keeps a version history log of all the changes i've made over time as i've written the fic, and i gave it to a friend to beta a few days before posting it, so i have record of that as well. aside from the fact i write at a fucking glacial pace (can't imagine why it would take me a whole month to write 6.4k if i was using ai to do it), i talked to dozens of people through the process of writing this because i'm a part of a community that genai writers simply don't feel the need to join

i hope you read this and understand that if ginger was even a tenth of the author she claimed she was, she would be able to say all this to you as well. she would have records, she would have a rebuttal, she would have the backbone to defend work she claims to have poured her heart into, and she would have stayed to have this conversation rather than deleting everything as fast as possible to avoid further scrutiny

i've never doubted who i am or what i stand for. i don't feel the need to run and hide when people ask me for the truth because i know i've been truthful this whole time. it's insane to me that so many of you are so used to lying that you assume everyone lives with the same fear and shame that you do

thanks for the ask!

[wave-mosaic]

Updated post with all the evidence I could find because I do not want to make baseless accusations, especially about the legitimacy of an artist's work

I strongly believe that this cover of "raise up your bat" by EllipsisEdits is AI generated

All comments mentioning AI, or the composing process at all, are filtered out no matter the intention. The channel does not directly address these claims to save face in any way

The first cover has inconsistent and completely altered melodies, and does not feature the lost girl chorus at all except for in lyrics; Structurally it is strange to repeat the same exact chorus three times

The captions in the video sometimes misinterpret the lyrics, which points to them being generated somehow. It's done in a way that cannot be explained as typos. The words in the thumbnail are also wrong

The youtube AI content labels are on every single one of her videos, and even though those can be false claims, the covers were also detected as AI by several other checkers

I think that it is suspicious that, on top of all of this, each cover was posted so quickly and with little time between them

For some reason she previously changed the descriptions of her videos to spell out "this is AI" in capital letters; this is her page from june 11

The channel has used AI art before. It's not even subtle (look at the collar, left sleeve, extra sleeve on the right)

Several others have pointed out that the voice in the covers is very similar to a model on Suno AI, and that the audio has this slightly fuzzy quality that can be seen in other AI generated music (like sound artifacts). However those are just observations, so make of that what you will

I am genuinely disappointed that we are at a point where things like this can go mostly undetected now. It really is an insult to artists who actually put time and effort into their work. Please spread the word if you can