#Automation Graphics Support | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

genderkoolaid · 1 year ago

Note

sorry if you've talked about it already, but what is it that makes KOSA's idea of online safety wrong? I don't know much about the bill, what does it intend to do?

What do you think is a good way to protect kids from things like online predators or just seeing things that they shouldn't be seeing? (By which I mean sex and graphic violence, things which you'd need to be 16+ to see in a movie theater so I think it makes sense to not want pre-teens to see it)

From stopkosa.com:

Why is KOSA a bad bill? KOSA uses two methods to “protect” kids, and both of them are awful. First, KOSA would incentivize social media platforms to erase content that could be deemed “inappropriate” for minors. The problem is: there is no consensus on what is inappropriate for minors. All across the country we are seeing how lawmakers are attacking young people’s access to gender affirming healthcare, sex education, birth control, and abortion. Online communities and resources that queer and trans youth depend on as lifelines should not be subject to the whims of the most rightwing extremist powers and we shouldn’t give them another tool to harm marginalized communities. Second, KOSA would ramp up the online surveillance of all internet users by expanding the use of age verification and parental monitoring tools. Not only are these tools needlessly invasive, they’re a massive safety risk for young people who could be trying to escape domestic violence and abuse.

I’ve heard there’s a new version of KOSA. What’s the deal? The new version of KOSA makes some good changes: narrowing the ability of rightwing attorneys general to weaponize KOSA to target content they don’t like and limiting the problematic “duty of care. However, because the bill is still not content neutral, KOSA still invites the harms that civil rights advocates have warned about. As LGBTQ and reproductive rights groups have said for months, the fundamental problem with KOSA is that its “duty of care” covers content specific aspects of content recommendation systems, and the new changes fail to address that. In fact, personalized recommendation systems are explicitly listed under the definition of a design feature covered by the duty of care in the new version. This means that a future Federal Trade Commission (FTC) could still use KOSA to pressure platforms into automated filtering of important, but controversial topics like LGBTQ issues and abortion, by claiming that algorithmically recommending such content “causes” mental health outcomes that are covered by the duty of care like anxiety and depression. Bans on inclusive books, abortion, and gender affirming healthcare have been passed on exactly that kind of rhetoric in many states recently. And we know that already existing content filtering systems impact content from marginalized creators exponentially more, resulting in discrimination and censorship. It’s also important to remember that algorithmic recommendation includes, for example, showing a user a post from a friend that they follow, since most platforms do not show all users all posts, but curate them in some way. As long as KOSA’s duty of care isn’t content neutral, platforms will be likely to react the same way that they did to the broad liability imposed by SESTA/FOSTA: by engaging in aggressive filtering and suppression of important, and in some cases lifesaving, content.

Why it's bad:

The way it's written (even after being changed, which the website also goes over), it is still possible for this law to be used to restrict things like queer content, discussion of reproductive rights and resources, and sexual education.

It will restrict youth's ability to use the Internet independently, essentially cutting off life support to many vulnerable people who rely on the Internet to learn that they are queer, being abused, disabled, etc.

Better alternatives:

Stop relying on ageist ideas of purity and innocence. When we focus on protecting the "purity" of youth, we dehumanize them and it becomes more about soothing adult anxieties than actually improving the lives of children.

Making sure content (sexual, violent, etc.) is marked/tagged and made avoidable for anyone who doesn't want to engage with it.

Teach children why certain things may be upsetting and how best to avoid those things.

Teach children how to recognize grooming and abuse and empower them to stop it themselves.

Teach children how to recognize fear, discomfort, trauma, and how to cope with those experiences.

The Internet makes a great boogeyman. But the idea that it is uniquely corrupting the Pure Innocent Youth relies on the idea that all children are middle-class suburban White kids from otherwise happy homes. What about the children who see police brutality on their front lawns, against their family members? How are we protecting them from being traumatized? Or children who are seeing and experiencing physical and sexual violence in their own homes, by the parents who prevent them from realizing what's happening by restricting their Internet usage? How does strengthening parent's rights stop those kids from being groomed? Or the kids who grow up in evangelical Christian homes and are given graphic descriptions of the horrors of the Apocalypse and told if they ever question their parents, they'll be left behind?

Children live in the same world we do. There are children who are already intimately aware of violence and "adult" topics because of their lived experiences. Actually protecting children means being concerned about THEIR human rights, it means empowering them to save themselves, it means giving them the tools to understand their own feelings and traumas. KOSA is just another in a long line of attempts to "save the children!" by dehumanizing them and giving more power to the people most likely to abuse them. We need to stop trying to protect children's "innocence" and appreciate that children are already growing, changing people, learning to deal with discomfort and pain and the weight of the world the same as everyone else. What people often think keeps kids safe really just keeps them ignorant and quiet.

Another explanation as to why it's bad:

#m.#ask box

180 notes · View notes

lunarsilkscreen · 5 months ago

Text

The Monetization System

This was going to be a deep dive into [wealth] and the history of the term and how [wealth] is not the same as [currency].

Then I figured... We already know what this is, right?

It's a simple transport system for getting goods with a [Per Diem]{per day costs} as a base line. And many people, who want money to be affected by the laws of Thermodynamics... That is; automatically, or Dynamically.

*It* {meaning the economy} isn't automatic. And the automation we use *isn't* beholden to the laws we have defined for it in our economic text books.

It's a system with which to move junk from one place to another utilizing human greed/need as the driving force. That's it.

And what keeps happening to this system is that it deviates from its intended purpose and shift towards that [greed] part of human greed/need.

If you think you can make an unlimited amount of money; you're sorely mistaken. If you think you can save an unlimited amount of money; the banks are still gonna lend yours out, because we need that money to move the economy.

Those things drive up costs and reduce the effectiveness of our economic structures. I've been deliberating on what the other side of the economic issues are; or aren't; and I'm definitely missing pieces of this puzzle. But I wouldn't expect congress to be able to tell me what they are.

Because I think this is the definition that *most* Americans have arrived at.

So what happens when the economy encounters a stutter or blockage like it tends to do every 5-10 years? Turn it off and back on again until we need to do so again?

The issue with that is that it doesn't reset anything, so nothing changes. Lots of corporate $$ invested into ensuring their systems boot up a certain way and shutdown another.

So turning it off and back on again won't affect the cache-clearing-need. And they're definitely uses quick boot tech... Which further restricts how much data needs to be reloaded, and often causes issues on a home PC.

I dunno if you've ever been stuck in the endless update of doom. It's part of the reason.

It's why you need to maintain your shit.

So we know these things should be able to be reset AND WE KNOW; Corporate and government interests from both sides (Fed, Banks, Every Financial Whatever) because they want to ensure a certain data integrity and less-breaking.

Creating a situation where the [breaking] that needs to be done, cannot be done. This kind of breaking is closer to an [reorganization] or a [spring cleaning].

How interesting.

They can't change it because they don't want it to deteriorate, or worse; lose transaction records.

So. Since [that] is *always* going to be broken, and everybody agrees it does not need to broken further; we need a way to distribute resources to where they need to go when the economy starts trickling down to a stop.

And, actually, a lot of this might already be covered in economic and farming and supply chain documentation.

Which is likely in place to ensure there are no food shortages even when your favorite [snack] isn't on the shelf.

So how do we consolidate all *that* information into a single document that can reference the other documentation?

And then use it to ensure that we counteract inflation for things that may not have reason to [inflate] not limited to [decreased demand] and [increased availability of resources].

At the same time; there's a recurring disruption in our tech sectors related to the price of Video Cards; which are attributed to Crypto and AI.

Which changes the target audience of our [graphics cards] from [work and hobby] to [throwing as much resources as Crypto and AI as we possibly can]

On the surface it looks like a drop in available resources. But that's *not* the case, it's a rise in demand for support towards a specific kind of technology that is both wasteful, and poorly implemented.

Not that it isn't useful; but the *kind* of increased demand we see in the tech sector has a direct correlation to both Crypto and AI, and includes how they're implemented, who's implementing them, and what restrictions they're taking account of to ensure a waste of [wan-internet] resources.

[wan-internet] is a term to describe the [world wide web] when restricted by region.

The [wan-internet] in this depiction is exactly like how you would think of a power plant. Not including the power demand, all power on the internet (especially by region) affects everybody else online currently.

And with the increased internet adoption rates; were *more* likely to see a huge adoption for more skilled tech experts AND increased demand and resource drain until the bubble itself either collapsed or decompresses.

Anyway; unless people get their butts into gear, the economy is likely to take a turn for the worse and increased intervals until the general population loses interest in generic AI and Crypto use-cases.

Which is why I'm making this suggestion.

We need a way to move resources where they need to go, or even people to where there is available (AFFORDABLE) housing should they have need. (Across the country, if it needs to be.)

So in order to curtail that inevitability; we need alternative ways to affect our economic and supply chain systems that are not directly tied to financial support arms.

And a way to charge developers creating WAN and maybe not paying their fair share towards resource generation (electricity) which a big difference from simply asking somebody to pay their taxes.

It may mean they don't know that the apps they create [wan apps specifically] how much affect that will have in their user's bottom line.

Or even that of their non-users... Since it congests all of our networks anyway!

21 notes · View notes

badcomicsrph · 2 months ago

Text

Photopea: How to batch resize square icons (101)

I personally use photoshop for most of my graphics need, but I know that this is not an option for a lot of folks, and I've decided to make a couple of RP specific tutorials using Photopea (free, web based, no software to install) and Krita (free, install required).

This first post is for Photopea.

You can grab your screenshots of comic books (for instance) with picpick or another software that allows you to screengrab specific shapes / pixel sizes. I use picpick (I purchased pro for my use, but if you don't intend to do sell your icons you may use the free version. It is as complete as the paying version) to screen grab at 150x150px. Tutorial from RPCheapos here. (For live action/animated, I recommend using "free video to jpg converter" for better results)

Now on to the resizing (Very Easy To Do imo) with a bunch of screen shots to show you the steps.

First step is to open www.photopea.com. You can create an account if you'd like. As it is a free site that lives thanks to ads, I would recommend turning off adblocker for this specific site.

Click File > Automate > resize image:

It will open a little pop up called "Resize". Click on Source Images. They're your screen grabs that you want to resize to a smaller size:

Caveat: I never tried more than a hundred screenshots at once. So do with that what you will. I've read posts of folks who have issues if they put too many pictures into photopea at once, but I never experienced that type of issues.

Once your images are loaded:

Change the parameters to your desired width/height. Note: it does NOT crop. If your screen grabs aren't square now, they won't be square after! Also select your favored format (I favor PNG over JPG: higher quality & supports transparency if needed)

After you click resize, it will open a popup in order to save your newly resized icons into a zip folder. Save it wherever you'd like with a name that talks to you, unzip the file, and now you have your resized icons!

This is pretty powerful but also! pretty limited. No cropping, no coloring, no sharpening, etc. But it is a good jumping point imo when you get started and just want all your icons to be the same size.

Take care, and sprinkle sparkles in your life!

~Emma

#photopea tutorial #icon resizing #mine*#my tutorial*

11 notes · View notes

twisted-tales-of-all · 2 years ago

Text

The Enemy of My Enemy

Summary: When your home port suddenly claims a ban on pirates docking there, you and your rival are forced to join forces. Characters: Kim Hongjoong + Gender Ambiguous Reader; ft. ATEEZ members Genre: Fantasy Short Series (part 1) with a bit of Angst (and possible fluff in later parts) Tropes: pirate!AU, enemies to friends (to lovers in a later part), working together against a mutual enemy Word Count: 2.9K Contains: pirate-related violence (explosions, knives, injury, blood, etc), betrayal, cursing, mention of death and loss of limbs, homoromantic undertones for certain characters (nothing explicit or confirmed), use of 'sir' as honorific without gendered undertones

A/N: support banner by @cafekitsune ; pirate divider by @firefly-graphics 🤍

You aren't new to discrimination, not by any means. However, that didn't stop you from getting blindsided as you tied your ship to its usual post at the port.

"This ship and its crew are unwelcome in this port." A stern, deep voice booms from behind you, loud enough to gather the attention of everyone nearby - all but yours, at least.

As you finish tying the knot and stand up, you feel the figure looming directly behind you. You hadn't the slightest thought that they were speaking of your wondrous Moon Raider, not after the past three years of ensuring that your crew respected the port and its customs.

Turning, you ask the man, "What ship is unwelcome, exactly?"

Although you wanted to hide your irritation, your crew noticed. The man also must've noticed since he clears his throat harshly before responding with a tone rivaling that of an automated robot.

"Any and all pirate ships have been banned from docking on our port. Leave immediately or face the consequences."

Your irritation morphs into booming laughter, "We always pay any fines you assign us. What's with the extra formality this time around?"

As you mimic his stature, you notice another officer walking past your boat's position. You watch him announce the same rehearsed statement to the captain there as he hops out to anchor his ship to its post. However, rather than offering him a chance to leave, he grabs his arm, locking him into constraints instantly. At this point, you realize the gravity of the situation, but it's all too late. As you're focused on the Sun Howler, the officer in front of you approaches and places restraints on you. You call out to your crew, reminding them to stay calm and follow all the rules.

Dragging your rival, the other officer follows behind as you walk with your officer silently. Trying to remain calm, you attempt to calculate why this may happen. Although you may not follow all the rules perfectly, everything worked out up until now. And, although you may not enjoy competing with him, you know Captain Hongjoong plays fair just like you. For the harbor police to arrest you both, there's really only one option: new port ownership. Although this was your first time back to the dock in months, you hadn't expected such a drastic change.

Reaching the prison, the officers shove you both into a cell together. Through the bars, they remove your cuffs.

"You sure we won't kill each other in here?" You joke, screaming at their backs as they leave, entirely unfazed by your comment.

"I think they'd prefer it," Hongjoong scoffs as he taps on the sheath on his hip, "Otherwise, they'd at least remove our obvious weapons."

Cursing, you sit down with your back against the cold brick wall. Fidgeting with the frayed fabric on the thigh of your pants, you wonder if the situation could get any worse.

"What'd you do, Raider?" He prompts, using your boat as your name, somewhat of a custom between you.

"Nothing here. Not in a long time. We've been gone for three months time. What of you, Howler?"

You look up to see him leaning against the opposite wall, arms crossed and one foot laid over the other. He shakes his head, and - although his hat covers his face - you can imagine how hard the cogs turn in his head to analyze the situation.

"It wasn't like this when I left either. We've only been gone about seven weeks. How'd something happen so quickly?"

After a long period of silence, you hear footsteps approaching. Even simply seeing their shoes, everything clicks for you. You can tell Hongjoong understands as well, as you can sense him tense up.

"Hongjoong.Y/N. What an amazing situation for us to reunite."

The callous tone pricks at your skin, leaving goosebumps in its stead, but you refuse to give them the satisfaction of a reaction. Your cellmate, however, is far too quick to anger to stop himself. He leans against the bars as he curses at the person who once sailed the seas opposite you both.

"The fuck is going on, Wooyoung?! Why in hell's name are you standing there high and mighty while we're stuck in a damned cage in this cellar?!"

Hands up by his head, Wooyoung stifles a laugh, "Quite aggressive now, aren't we? I know we were rivals on the sea years ago, but it looks like I won out."

"Sell out. Traitor. Fucking turncoat."

This time, he allows his laugh to echo through the prison. Cockily, he steps closer to Hongjoong, leaning in just barely out of reach.

"Does it matter what I did if I won? You look pathetic, Captain."

With this comment, you interject, "This is why you never had a loyal crew, you know. Your ego got in the way and Topaz Shields lost out because of it. Such a gorgeous ship, too. So sad. How's the leg?"

Knowing he wanted to hit below the belt, you remind him of his greatest tragedy by asking about his leg. Due to his ego, he drove his ship directly into the sirens' call and barely escaped with his life. He lost his loyal-to-a-fault first mate that day two years ago, all because he couldn't stand the thought of the other two crews finding a sacred treasure before him.

"Don't you dare mention Shields, Raider. The leg was the least of my troubles, and you know that much."

"Right, right. Pardon my impertinence. How could I forget that you lost your boyfriend as well?"

Trying to hold his composure, he reminds you that San was only ever his first mate, nothing more. Despite what everyone knows to be true thanks to their actions and Wooyoung's immediate reaction to the man's untimely death, he has denied his feelings since the incident - something to hide behind to lessen his feelings of guilt for causing his death.

"Well, whatever the case, I've come here to alert you that we'll be charging you for crimes against the city through your illegal market dealings and disregard for the laws of the area."

Hearing a former pirate captain charge someone for essentially being a pirate feels laughable, but you simply ask for the price point of said charges.

"Oh, no price for this one, Y/N. You both have been sentenced to time in jail equal to that of your career length. For you, that's three years; Hongjoong, you have 4."

Quick to react once again, Hongjoong unsheaths his dagger and swings it through the bars. It cuts Wooyoung on the lower part of his cheek, but the sound is far more intimidating than the actual damage.

Bringing his hand up to his face, Wooyoung smirks as he sees his red-stained fingertips. You keep a hand on your weapon, worried he might lash out against you both, but he simply turns to walk out.

"Enjoy your years. Once you return, there will be no Sun Howler. No Moon Raider. No pirates." He doubles down with his irritating remarks by waving his hand nonchalantly as he turns the corner.

As soon as the click of his footsteps fades to silence, Hongjoong drops into a squat. He curses Wooyoung and grumbles about the ridiculous sentencing. Seeing him freak out like this makes you giggle. He's usually light and free, the shining sun amongst a hoard of disheveled and mangled captains. You share that commonality with him - you've never quite been one for abandoning health and presentation, even if that's what many people picture when imagining pirates. The crews from this port rarely saw those kinds of pirates, not when the three captains who called this place home were you, Hongjoong, and Wooyoung. So, seeing one of these captains falling apart on the floor while cursing and swinging at someone makes you wonder how quickly you could also fall apart.

Shaking your head to rid yourself of those thoughts, you break the silence, "What's the plan, Howler?"

He looks at you dumbfounded, "Plan?"

"The escape plan? Ain't no way I'm letting that one-legged chicken act all high and mighty like that. We aren't gonna sit here and accept years of punishment for things he once did with us."

Suddenly recognizing escape as an option, Hongjoong stands up straight. You see a fire burning in his eyes and tricks within his crooked smile. He twirls the dagger around carelessly as he paces in the small box of a cell. With his newfound joy, he examines the bars, the lock, and every crevice that might be used to thwart Wooyoung's scheme and escape from the prison.

"I think this calls for a good old-fashioned bust out. Unless you think you can pick the lock from in here."

You approach the bars, trying to find the perfect angle to see what you need on the lock. However, you can't find the necessary parts to allow you to pick it from awkward angles. Turning to your cellmate, you shake your head.

"Bust out it is. Not as quiet, but it gets the job done all the same." He reaches into the inner pocket of his coat and pulls out a small trinket about the size and shape of a pocketwatch, which confuses you. He must be able to read the confusion on your face, because he explains, "My first mate loves to tinker, and he's made some marvelous contraptions. Stand back at the bars and watch."

Listening to his advice, you stand flush against the metal bars, the cold bleeding through your clothing to leave your skin feeling fresh. He stands next to you, flips the gadget open and closed quickly, and tosses it to the opposite side of the cell. When it connects with the wall, you hear a clicking noise and instinctively close your eyes. In that short moment, you feel Hongjoong move from beside you to in front of you. With the cold on your back and the warmth from his body closely in front of you, you barely process the explosion. When you open your eyes, you see the captain boxing himself around you, framed by the outside light streaming in. You assume it's around midday from how strongly it enters the room, and you try to look anywhere that isn't directly at Hongjoong's face.

He clears his throat as he steps back, "Sorry. I didn't want debris flying into your chest or anything."

Noticing him fiddling with his shoulder, you quickly thank him before asking if he's injured. Although he blows it off, he refuses to turn around, so you know debris likely lodged itself into his upper back. You decide not to fight it until you reach the docks, so you simply make your way over the rubble and out into the sunlight, letting him follow behind to hide his injuries.

Despite the explosion, nobody seems interested when you walk past. The only looks passed your way feel like those typical for known pirates walking around. As you reach the docks again, your crew quickly catches sight of you and rushes off the ship. You're glad that they make it to you long before his crew can see you.

"Mingi, can you tend to him? We blew our way out of jail, and he got hit with debris. He's acting like he's fine, but drag him aboard anyway."

Hongjoong tries to argue, but Mingi ends up behind him and sees the injury. With your first mate yelling at him for hiding it, he can't help but walk onto the Moon Raider for medical help. As he passes you, you sneak a glance at his back and see the top left corner of his otherwise tan shirt torn and stained dark red already. Trying to figure out the trajectory of the rubble, you place your hand on your right shoulder and vow to find Hongjoong a new shirt as thanks for blocking it from hitting you.

After reassuring your crew that everything will be okay and joking that you may be fined for the massive hole in the prison wall, you make your way past your prized ship. Approaching Sun Howler, you receive a much colder reception. Bowing before the ship, you address the first mate.

"Quartermaster of Sun Howler, I wish to inform you that your captain is currently aboard the Moon Raider receiving medical care from my crew. He protected me during an explosion of his creation, so I took it as my role to aid him with our supplies. He will be fine, and we will send him to you once his wound is properly dressed."

As you raise your head, you notice an exceptionally pretty man standing about ten feet in front of you. He nods as you acknowledge him before thanking you for taking care of his captain. You weren't expecting someone who could shine in his own respect to be Hongjoong's right hand, but hearing him speak makes you understand exactly why he would be in such a position. A voice that rivals one of a siren, the grace in his speech patterns, and his subtly decorated uniform all suggest a royal background. You begin to wonder whether he was a runaway or kidnapped and assimilated.

"Stop gawking at Seonghwa, Raider. Don't go stealing someone else's first mate." Hongjoong struts up to you, shirtless other than the bandages circling his chest, back, and shoulder blade.

Although Seonghwa laughs at the comment and explains the situation, Hongjoong doesn't back down in his jests, pointing out Seonghwa's obvious beauty.

"Sometimes, even I swear you're a siren. Even royals don't typically look and sound as good as you. You sparkle, Hwa." He reaches the boy as he talks, placing a hand on his shoulder to emphasize his final sentence.

"Captain, stop with the flattery. A first mate is never as wonderful as the captain, and yet you forbid us from saying those types of comments towards you."

Feeling out of place in the interaction, you quietly excuse yourself and begin walking back to your ship, but Hongjoong calls after you, "Y/N, let's find a new port together."

You try not to react, but the comment makes you trip over the air by your feet. You hope that they don't notice while you continue walking, making your way to your ship to break the news to your crew that you need to find a new home base and likely won't be able to return. Some crew members are quick to show their anger towards Wooyoung, but you reassure everyone with one simple claim.

"If we've done everything we can and they still don't want us here, we shouldn't want to stay either."

You explain how there likely isn't any time for goodbyes since the police likely won't waste time chasing you down again, so you work towards setting sail immediately. Luckily, your crew instinctively filled up on supplies while you were stuck in the cell, so there isn't much left to do.

"Cap'n, there's someone requesting to talk to you. Should we allow him aboard?" A member screams across the ship.

"Who is it?"

"Captain Hongjoong of Sun Howler, sir."

"Let him board."

As your new companion faces you, you address him properly and lead him into your chambers. Motioning to the nearest chair at your desk, you drop the formalities in the privacy of the room. Dragging out another chair to sit in front of him, you ask about the plan. As he recounts the pirates and their known home ports, you deduce that the safest plan would be to sail north, up the coast to the city rivaling this one.

"Won't they shun us away?"

"Didn't you and I once shun each other away and brace this port together regardless? Or what of Wooyoung taking over this city to shun us away from here?"

Nodding in acknowledgment, Hongjoong confirms, "So, we head north? Stop at each port we come across?"

"We might end up too close if we do that. Does your crew have the supplies to sail safely for a week before finding a port? I don't want to taunt Shields too soon; I want to be ready to fight back."

Uncertain of Wooyoung's response to your escape, the captain agrees to meet again in a week's time. After the seventh sunrise, they will look for the closest port. In case of landing at different ports, you agree on a plan to find one another via smoke signals and a trail of coded notes. To stay one step ahead of potential enemies, you assign each other new aliases to use in the notes, basing the initials on the boats' names and their respective quartermasters: Sea Heist Sails and Mightly Reel Mast.

After agreeing on the specifics, you shake Hongjoong's hand and wish him luck on his journey. Leaving you with a quick show of comradery in smiling and claiming that he'll see you in a week, he heads back to the Sun Howler to untie her and set sail. Following his lead, you untie Moon Raider and instruct Mingi to head north, staying near the coastline if possible.

As you drift out of the port, you hear a commotion behind you. Eyes drawn towards the ruckus, you see Wooyoung red-faced and angrily yelling at his guards. As he flails his arms in the direction of your ship, he makes direct eye contact with you. With a smug smile on your face, you remove your hat in a mocking salute, signaling to the man that you've won this round without breaking a sweat.

Tags: @yourfatherlucifer @pyeonghongrie

#cultofdionysusnet #wonderlandnet #kpop scenarios #kpop imagines #kpop fanfiction #kpop fic #ateez #ateez imagines #ateez scenarios #ateez fanfiction #ateez fic #ateez hongjoong #pirate ateez #ateez pirate au #kim hongjoong #hongjoong scenarios #hongjoong imagines #hongjoong fic #hongjoong fanfic

126 notes · View notes

coquettesinclair · 7 months ago

Text

I don't have a graphics tablet with me rn and my ipad is dead! heres a crappy CAAT intro on paper

What is a C.A.A.T?

Simple! C.A.A.T is a Corporate Automated ATtorney! Mann Co. can't keep up with 20 lawsuits with testifiers lining out the courtrooms alone. No human being would defend Mann. Co, so C.A.A.T is here to make up for their inadequacies!

CAAT's out of the bag! support your local clawyer at @tf2occontest !

#entry #tf2occontest2024 #caat #corporate automated attorney #tf2 oc

8 notes · View notes

elderscrollsconceptart · 1 year ago

Text

So was my father before he and his entire department were fired and replaced by a third party contractees from India.

I'm genuinely curious, your work in graphic design, do you see it as something you're proud of? Do you see value in your work?

My entire family is full of artists. They're all lucky enough to have earned their careers in a time when the worst thing that could happen was to be replaced by cheaper international labor like my father was (he's a janitor now and suffers terrible physical pain from his job)

Do you feel prepared in the event you lose access to your industry and career? How would you feel if you were forced to pursue another job because you were "replaced" not even by a human, but by an AI that was considered "better" than you?

I can tell you on my end I've heard loud rumblings that corporate wants to automate out most people in my department. I've taken proactive measures to clarify the necessity of real people in my work position and actually found a sympathetic ear from the VP of my company.

That support from the VP happened *because* I complained and spoke up. Maybe I'll get replaced anyways, but I won't have taken it without standing up for myself the best and most professional way I could. Have you taken steps to protect yourself and people you've worked with?

Surely you care enough about yourself and others to realize that its actually possible to affect change, however big or small, by actually standing up for yourself?

21 notes · View notes

stevenketterman2 · 9 days ago

Text

Static vs Dynamic Lighting Modes in LED Bar Fixtures

Explore the essentials of static vs dynamic lighting modes in LED bar fixtures. Learn how to choose between fixed-color and animated effects, with insights on setups and creative applications.

A creative workspace blending static and dynamic LED bar lighting modes in real time.

Introduction

LED bar fixtures are versatile lighting tools found in stages, events, and creative spaces. Whether they’re used for ambient illumination, spot washes, or visual accents, they typically support two main operation modes: static lighting (steady, fixed color) and dynamic lighting (animated, effect-driven). Understanding the differences between these modes is essential for crafting immersive light setups.

A Brief Historical Lens

Lighting has evolved dramatically over the decades. Early stage and event lighting relied on static, incandescent fixtures, limited to single hues and manual operation. With the rise of LEDs and digital control systems like DMX and Art‑Net, fixtures gained pixel-level control and dynamic sequencing. This shift parallels developments in other creative tech: just as audio moved from analog to immersive spatial sound, lighting transitioned toward expressive, software-driven setups.

What Is Static Lighting?

Static lighting modes deliver a steady, unchanging output. Think: a solid blue wash over a dance floor or focused white light on a lectern. This mode emphasizes:

Consistency: Maintains a color or intensity without variation.

Simplicity: Ideal for straightforward setups with no programming.

Energy use: Generally stable, often draws slightly more power than pulsed modes.

For creative use, static modes work well when ambient balance or visual neutrality is needed—say, during a speech or calm interlude.

What Is Dynamic Lighting?

Dynamic lighting modes feature movement, transitions, and timed changes. Modes include chases, fades, strobes, color cycles, pixel-mapped effects, and sound-activated sequences. Dynamic lighting works through pulsed or programmed control—either locally using built-in memory or externally via control protocols.

Why does dynamic work?

Energy efficiency & longevity: Pulse-mode operation can reduce overall power draw and limit stress on the light source.

Creative flexibility: Fine-grain control enables sync to music, live scene changes, and animation across a fixture or multiple fixtures.

Static vs Dynamic: Side-by-Side

Static lighting delivers a steady ambiance, while dynamic effects create motion, mood shifts, and energy.

For example, a DJ booth might benefit from static lighting during set transitions and dynamic lighting during peak performance moments.

Use Case Scenarios

1. Ambient Design vs Peak Performance

Static lighting delivers a balanced, undistracted backdrop for workshops or speaking events. On the flip side, dynamic sweeps and color shifts create energy at music events—festive moments, dancefloor peaks, or theatrical reveals.

2. Pixel Mapping & Content Integration

Dynamic modes support pixel mapping—mapping content across fixture segments to form visuals, patterns, or graphics. Ideal for projections, AV syncing, or themed visuals.

3. Control Workflow

Wired systems offer reliable syncing and external control.

Onboard modes simplify setup with built-in automated or sound-reactive presets.

Hybrid systems allow manual fallback if the main controller fails.

Working with knowledgeable audio and lighting shops ensures gear aligns with specific performance needs.

Practical Setup Tips

Power management: Chain fixtures carefully; dynamic pulsing can draw varied currents, so calculate power load accordingly.

Signal integrity: Use proper cabling and termination to avoid signal dropouts during live use.

Flicker awareness: Low-frequency pulse effects may be visible on camera or cause eye strain under certain conditions.

Mounting and aiming: Raise and angle bars properly to reduce glare and maintain control console visibility.

Beyond the Basics

Modern lighting setups might include tunable white or CCT-adjustable bars, offering both static warmth and dynamic white shifts. These are especially useful in applications like gallery installs, wellness centers, or adaptive indoor environments. They're a strong bridge between fixed color settings and dynamic adaptability.

Which Mode Is Right?

Choose based on:

Intensity of effect: Dynamic modes shine in high-energy contexts like concerts, while static is sufficient for background or utility lighting.

User readiness: Static suits users with minimal programming experience; dynamic suits require more setup.

Budget: Dynamic-ready kits may cost more upfront, but add value for performance-driven use.

In many real-world applications, blending delivers the best of both worlds—control and expression.

Conclusion

The interplay between static and dynamic lighting modes defines the versatility of LED bar fixtures. Static modes offer steady tones ideal for consistent ambiance, while dynamic modes open the door to animation, transitions, and custom light shows. As lighting control continues to advance, understanding these modes becomes foundational for creative expression.

Both static and dynamic options serve their place in the creative toolkit. Start small experiment with a few lighting scenes, mix modes, and explore timing. Learning these fundamentals builds toward more immersive, intelligent lighting designs.

Lighting isn’t just about visibility—it’s part of storytelling. The more refined the control, the more room there is to shape the experience. Whether building a compact studio or managing a larger venue, knowing how and when to use each mode leads to smarter, more effective setups.

#pro audio gear #pro audio equipment #dj #pro audio #stage lighting #led lights #dj gears #led wall display #pro audio store #professional audio shop #dj equipments #dj lights #led light

2 notes · View notes

scotisfr · 4 months ago

Text

☑☐☐☐☐☐☐ Reading - 40 pages ☑☑☐☐☐☐☐ Brushing my teeth ☑☑☑☑☐☐☐ Write - 400 words ☑☑☑☐☐☐☐ Journal - 20 minutes ☑☐☐☐☐☐☐ Walk/bicycle - 15 minutes ☑☐☐ Shower

☐ STUDI (secretary-accountant): 10h40/20h ☑ Live (4h/1h) ☑ Virtual class - Last friday (2h) ☑ Mon parcours (1h) ☑ Newsletter (1h) ☐ Self-study (6h40/11h) [🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷|🌷🌱🕳️🕳️🕳️|🕳️] ☑ Leçon : RGPD (1h) ☑ Leçon : Gestion documentaire et sources d'informations (0h30) ☑ Leçon : Le suivi des documents (0h30) ☑ Leçon : Le classement (1h) ☑ Leçon : Introduction : La conservation des données (0h30) ☑ Leçon : L'archivage des données pour garder une valeur juridique. (0h30) ☑ Leçon : Le stockage et la sauvegarde de données (0h30) ☑ Leçon : Les acteurs internes du circuit de l'information (0h20) ☑ Leçon : Les niveaux d'accès à l'information (0h20) ☑ Leçon : Le circuit de l'information ☑ Module : Construire un support de communication (0h50) ☑ Leçon : L'environnement informatique de gestion de l'information (0h20) ☑ Leçon : Les outils de diffusion de l'information (0h20) ☐ CS50X: finish the video ☐ ScholarVox: one book

☑ Cat litter ☑ Deskroom ☐ Finish webdesign of my blog ☐ About me page ☐ Novels and fanfiction page ☐ Take appointment with sleep doctor ☑ Finish REVOL logotype ☑ Go to the pharmacy ☑ Work on my automated calendar

Done list (bonus tasks): ☑ Cover for my fanfic He called me real ☑ Sketched the mascot of REVOL ☑ Make the blank document for the graphic chart ☑ Make an A3 doc to explain who REVOL is and what we aim to do ☑ Make REVOL some texture

Task's key: ☐ To-do - ☑ Done 🕳️ To study - 🌱 30 minutes - 🌷 1 hour

Sunday: I was so productive stydy-wise ! I made so much progress ! It as eased by the fact that a lot were about formating and respecting a graphic identity: I'm a graphist firt, so I already know all that. I also started to move all my study notes into Obsidian. It'll take some times to move all that, but being able to make links between concepts learned is already helping me so much !

#daily life #scotis #scotis studyblr #self study #studyblr #studyblr community #secrétaire-comptable #secretary-accountant #30dglc

3 notes · View notes

wolfliving · 4 months ago

Text

A scholarly bibliography of Design Fiction, AI and the news, 2025

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was funded by the Helsingin Sanomat Foundation and the Kone Foundation. We thank all the ideation workshop participants.

REFERENCES

[1] Naseem Ahmadpour, Sonja Pedell, Angeline Mayasari, and Jeanie Beh. 2019. Co-creating and Assessing Future Wellbeing Technology Using Design

Fiction. She Ji 5, 3 (2019), 209 230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.08.003

[2] ArtefactGroup. The Tarot Cards of Tech. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://tarotcardsoftech.artefactgroup.com

[3] Reuben Binns. 2018. Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason. Philos. Technol. 31, 4 (December 2018), 543 556.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S13347-017-0263-5/METRICS

[4] Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. Retrieved January 9, 2020 from

http://drbfw5wfjlxon.cloudfront.net/writing/DesignFiction_WebEdition.pdf

[5] [6] Julian Bleecker, Nick Foster, Fabien Girardin, and Nicolas Nova. 2022. The Manual of Design Fiction.

Mark Blythe. 2014. Research through design fiction: Narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2014), 703

712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557098

[7] Mark Blythe and Enrique Encinas. 2016. The co-ordinates of design fiction: Extrapolation, irony, ambiguity and magic. Proc. Int. ACM Siggr. Conf.

Support. Gr. Work 13-16-Nove, (2016), 345 354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957299

[8] J. Broekens, M. Heerink, and H. Rosendal. 2009. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8, 2 (2009).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00

[9] Kevin Matthe Caramancion. 2023. News Verifiers Showdown: A Comparative Performance Evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Bing AI, and

Bard in News Fact-Checking. Proc. - 2023 IEEE Futur. Networks World Forum Futur. Networks Imagining Netw. Futur. FNWF 2023 (2023).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/FNWF58287.2023.10520446

[10] Mia Carbone, Stuart Soroka, and Johanna Dunaway. 2024. The Psychophysiology of News Avoidance: Does Negative Affect Drive Both Attention and Inattention to News? Journal. Stud. (September 2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2310672

[11] John M. Carroll. 1997. Human computer interaction: psychology as a science of design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 4 (April 1997), 501 522.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/IJHC.1996.0101

[12] Mark Chignell, Lu Wang, Atefeh Zare, and Jamy Li. 2023. The Evolution of HCI and Human Factors: Integrating Human and Artificial Intelligence.

ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 30, 2 (March 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3557891/ASSET/0C373876-F5A8-40E8-A46E-

273567CE2001/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/TOCHI-2021-0178-F03.JPG

[13] Justin Clark, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, Adam Holland, Hilary Ross, and Casey Tilton. 2019. Content and Conduct: How English Wikipedia Moderates

Harmful Speech. Retrieved September 11, 2024 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3489176

[14] Marios Constantinides, John Dowell, David Johnson, and Sylvain Malacria. 2015. Exploring mobile news reading interactions for news app

personalisation. MobileHCI 2015 - Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Human-Computer Interact. with Mob. Devices Serv. (August 2015), 457 462.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785860/SUPPL_FILE/P457-CONSTANTINIDES-SUPPL.ZIP

[15] Henry Kudzanai Dambanemuya and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021. Auditing the Information Quality of News-Related Queries on the Alexa Voice

Assistant. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3449157

[16] [17] [18] Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2019. Automating the news: how algorithms are rewriting the media. (2019), 326.

Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial design as inquiry and practice. MIT Press.

Abraham Doris-Down, Husayn Versee, and Eric Gilbert. 2013. Political blend: An application designed to bring people together based on political

differences. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2013), 120 130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2483002

[19] Konstantin Nicholas Dörr. 2016. Mapping the field of Algorithmic Journalism. Digit. Journal. 4, 6 (2016), 700 722.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748

[20] Konstantin Nicholas Dörr and Katharina Hollnbuchner. 2017. Ethical Challenges of Algorithmic Journalism. Digit. Journal. 5, 4 (April 2017), 404

419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1167612

[21] Tomislav Duricic, Dominik Kowald, Emanuel Lacic, and Elisabeth Lex. 2023. Beyond-accuracy: a review on diversity, serendipity, and fairness in

recommender systems based on graph neural networks. Front. Big Data 6, (December 2023), 1251072.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/FDATA.2023.1251072/BIBTEX

[22] Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, Justin M Rao, David Blei, Ceren Budak, Susan Dumais, Andrew Gelman, Dan Goldstein, Matt Salganik, Tim Wu, and

Georgios Zervas. 2016. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opin. Q. 80, S1 (January 2016), 298 320.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/POQ/NFW006

[23] [24] Richard Fletcher and R. Nielsen. 2024. What does the public in six countries think of generative AI in news?

Terry Flew, Christina Spurgeon, Anna Daniel, and Adam Swift. 2012. The Promise of Computational Journalism. Journal. Pract. 6, 2 (2012), 157 171.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.616655

[25] Julian De Freitas, Stuti Agarwal, Bernd Schmitt, and Nick Haslam. 2023. Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools. Nat. Hum. Behav.

242023 711 7, 11 (November 2023), 1845 1854. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01734-2

[26] Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Ruilin Zheng, Jingyuan Cai, Keng Siau, and Langtao Chen. 2023. Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and

AI-human collaboration. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 25, 3 (July 2023), 277 304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814

[27] Fuse. 2024. Fuse - Personalized News. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from https://pageone.livesemantics.com/

[28] hary Kenton, Mikel

Rodriguez, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown, Canfer Akbulut, Andrew Trask, Edward Hughes, and Et Al. 2024. The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants.

(April 2024), 2024 2028. Retrieved September 9, 2024 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16244v2

[29] Mingqi Gao, Xinyu Hu, Jie Ruan, Xiao Pu, and Xiaojun Wan. 2024. LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges. (February 2024).

Retrieved September 8, 2024 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01383v2

[30] William W Gaver, Peter Gall Krogh, and Andy Boucher. 2022. Emergence as a Feature of Practice-based Design Research. In Designing Interactive

, 517 526.

[31] Sabine Geers. 2020. News Consumption across Media Platforms and Content: A Typology of Young News Users. Public Opin. Q. 84, S1 (August 2020),

332 354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/POQ/NFAA010

[32] Nicole Gillespie, STeven Lockey, Caitlin Curtis, Javad Pool, and Ali Akbari. 2023. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings. Univ.

Queensl. KPMG Aust. 10, (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14264/00d3c94

[33] [34] GroundNews. 2024. Ground News. Retrieved August 3, 2024 from https://ground.news/about

Michael M. Grynbaum and Ryan Mac. 2023. The Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over A.I. Use of Copyrighted Work. The New York Times.

Retrieved January 15, 2024 from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit

[35] Derek Hales. 2013. Design fictions an introduction and provisional taxonomy. Digit. Creat. 24, 1 (March 2013), 1 10.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.769453

[36] Vikas Hassija, Vinay Chamola, Atmesh Mahapatra, Abhinandan Singal, Divyansh Goel, Kaizhu Huang, Simone Scardapane, Indro Spinelli, Mufti Mahmud, and Amir Hussain. 2024. Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognit. Comput. 16, 1 (January

2024), 45 74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S12559-023-10179-8/FIGURES/14

[37] Michael Townsen Hicks, James Humphries, and Joe Slater. 2024. ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics Inf. Technol. 26, 2 (June 2024), 1 10.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-024-09775-5/METRICS

[38] Lennart Hofeditz, Milad Mirbabaie, Jasmin Holstein, and Stefan Stieglitz. 2021. Do You Trust an AI-Journalist? A Credibility Analysis of News

Content with AI-Authorship. ECIS (2021), 6 14. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/50

[39] Naja Holten Holten Møller, Trine Rask Nielsen, and Christopher Le Dantec. 2021. Work of the Unemployed. DIS 2021 - Proc. 2021 ACM Des. Interact.

Syst. Conf. Nowhere Everywhere (June 2021), 438 448. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462003/ASSETS/HTML/IMAGES/IMAGE3.JPG

[40] Avery E. Holton and Hsiang Iris Chyi. 2012. News and the Overloaded Consumer: Factors Influencing Information Overload Among News

Consumers. https://home.liebertpub.com/cyber 15, 11 (November 2012), 619 624. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/CYBER.2011.0610

[41] Chenyan Jia, Martin J. Riedl, and Samuel Woolley. 2024. Promises and Perils of Automated Journalism: Algorithms, Experimentat

Journal. Stud. 25, 1 (January 2024), 38 57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289881

[42] Sangyeon Kim, Insil Huh, and Sangwon Lee. 2022. No Movie to Watch: A Design Strategy for Enhancing Content Diversity through Social

Recommendation in the Subscription-Video-On-Demand Service. Appl. Sci. 2023, Vol. 13, Page 279 13, 1 (December 2022), 279.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13010279

[43] Joel Kiskola, Thomas Olsson, Heli Väätäjä, Aleksi H. Syrjämäki, Anna Rantasila, Poika Isokoski, Mirja Ilves, and Veikko Surakka. 2021. Applying critical voice in design of user interfaces for supporting self-reflection and emotion regulation in online news commenting. In of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445783

[44] n with Black Mirror.

SIGCSE 2022 - Proc. 53rd ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ. 1, (February 2022), 836 842. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499308

[45] Tomoko Komatsu, Marisela Gutierrez Lopez, Stephann Makri, Colin Porlezza, Glenda Cooper, Andrew MacFarlane, and Sondess Missaoui. 2020. AI

should embody our values: Investigating journalistic values to inform AI technology design. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (October 2020).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420105

[46] Peter Gall Krogh, Thomas Markussen, and Anne Louise Bang. 2015. Ways of drifting Five methods of experimentation in research through design.

Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 34, (2015), 39 50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2232-3_4/TABLES/1

[47] Shaun Lawson, Ben Kirman, Conor Linehan, Tom Feltwell, and Lisa Hopkins. 2015. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative

Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702260

[48] Hao Ping Lee, Yu Ju Yang, Thomas Serban von Davier, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sauvik Das. 2024. Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A

Taxonomy of AI Privacy Risks. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (May 2024).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642116/SUPPL_FILE/PN8548-SUPPLEMENTAL-MATERIAL-1.XLSX

[49] Sunok Lee, Minha Lee, and Sangsu Lee. 2023. What If Artificial Intelligence Become Completely Ambient in Our Daily Lives? Exploring Future

Human-AI Interaction through High Fidelity Illustrations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 39, 7 (2023), 1371 1389.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080155

[50] rceptions of

Generative Artificial Intelligence. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 18, 24 (May 2024).

25DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642114/SUPPL_FILE/PN9381-SUPPLEMENTAL-MATERIAL-2.PDF

[51] Sixian Li, Alessandro M. Peluso, and Jinyun Duan. 2023. Why do we prefer humans to artificial intelligence in telemarketing? A mind perception

explanation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 70, (January 2023), 103139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2022.103139

[52] Joseph Lindley and Paul Coulton. 2015. Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2015), 210 211.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783592

[53] Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Humans 2, 1

(January 2024), 100054. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBAH.2024.100054

[54] [55] Listen2.AI. 2024. Listen2.AI. Retrieved August 7, 2024 from https://listen2.ai/

Andrés Lucero and Juha Arrasvuori. 2010. PLEX Cards: A source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2010),

28 37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823821

[56] Thomas Markussen and Eva Knutz. 2013. The poetics of design fiction. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Des. Pleasurable Prod. Interfaces, DPPI 2013 (2013), 231

240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513531

[57] Suvodeep Misra, Debayan Dhar, and Sukumar Nandi. 2023. Design Fiction: A Way to Foresee the Future of Human Computer Interaction Design

Challenges. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 343, (2023), 809 822. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0293-4_65

[58] Rachel E. Moran and Sonia Jawaid Shaikh. 2022. Robots in the News and Newsrooms: Unpacking Meta-Journalistic Discourse on the Use of Artificial

Intelligence in Journalism. Digit. Journal. 10, 10 (November 2022), 1756 1774. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2085129

[59] Victoria Moreno-Gil, Xavier Ramon-Vegas, Ruth Rodríguez-Martínez, and Marcel Mauri-Ríos. 2023. Explanatory Journalism within European Fact

Checking Platforms: An Ally against Disinformation in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Soc. 2023, Vol. 13, Page 237 13, 11 (November 2023), 237.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/SOC13110237

[60] Sean A. Munson, Stephanie Y. Lee, and Paul Resnick. 2013. Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget. Proc. Int.

AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 7, 1 (2013), 419 428. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1609/ICWSM.V7I1.14429

[61] Kevin P. Murphy. 2023. Probabilistic machine learning: Advanced topics. MIT Press.

[62] Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, Craig T. Robertson, A. Ross Arguedas, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2024. Reuters Institute digital news report 2024.

[63] Safiya Umoja Noble. 2020. Algorithms of Oppression. Algorithms of Oppression (December 2020).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479833641.001.0001

[64] Donald Norman. 2024. Design for a Better World: Meaningful, Sustainable, Humanity Centered. MIT Press.

[65] treme Right

and Online Recommender Systems. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33, 4 (August 2015), 459 478.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0894439314555329-FIG5.JPEG

[66] Andreas L. Opdahl, Bjørnar Tessem, Duc Tien Dang-Nguyen, Enrico Motta, Vinay Setty, Eivind Throndsen, Are Tverberg, and Christoph Trattner.

2023. Trustworthy journalism through AI. Data Knowl. Eng. 146, April (2023), 102182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2023.102182

[67] Sharon Oviatt. 2006. Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: Designing interfaces that help people think. Proc. 14th Annu. ACM Int.

Conf. Multimedia, MM 2006 (2006), 871 880. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1180639.1180831

[68] Ozlem Ozmen Garibay, Brent Winslow, Salvatore Andolina, Margherita Antona, Anja Bodenschatz, Constantinos Coursaris, Gregory Falco, Stephen

M. Fiore, Ivan Garibay, Keri Grieman, John C. Havens, Marina Jirotka, Hernisa Kacorri, Waldemar Karwowski, Joe Kider, Joseph Konstan, Sean

Koon, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Iliana Maifeld-Carucci, Sean McGregor, Gavriel Salvendy, Ben Shneiderman, Constantine Stephanidis, Christina

Strobel, Carolyn Ten Holter, and Wei Xu. 2023. Six Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Grand Challenges. Int. J. Human Computer Interact. 39,

3 (2023), 391 437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320

[69] Sumit Pahwa and Nusrat Khan. 2022. Factors Affecting Emotional Resilience in Adults. Manag. Labour Stud. 47, 2 (May 2022), 216 232.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X211072935/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0258042X211072935-FIG1.JPEG

[70] Rock Yuren Pang, Sebastin Santy, René Just, and Katharina Reinecke. 2024. BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital

Technologies. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (May 2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642054/SUPPL_FILE/PN1128-

SUPPLEMENTAL-MATERIAL-1.PDF

[71]

[72] Jonathan Perry. 2021. Trust in Public Institutions: Trends and Implications for Economic Security. Aff. United Nations Dep. Econ. Soc. (July 2021).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.18356/27081990-108

[73] James Pierce. 2021. In tension with progression: Grasping the frictional tendencies of speculative, critical, and other alternative designs. In Conference

on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445406

[74] Amanda Ramsälv, Mats Ekström, and Oscar Westlund. 2023. The epistemologies of data journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221150439

(January 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221150439

[75] Jeba Rezwana and Mary Lou Maher. 2023. User Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Human-AI Co-Creativity: A Design Fiction Study. ACM Int.

Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2023), 62 74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593364

[76] Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2022. Recommender Systems Handbook: Third Edition. Recomm. Syst. Handb. Third Ed. (January

2022), 1 1060. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4

[77] Ronda Ringfort-Felner, Robin Neuhaus, Judith Dörrenbächer, Sabrina Großkopp, Dimitra Theofanou-fuelbier, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2023. Design

Fiction in a Corporate Setting a Case Study. In 14, 2023, 2093 2108.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596126

26[78] Francisco Javier Rodrigo-Ginés, Jorge Carrillo-de-Albornoz, and Laura Plaza. 2024. A systematic review on media bias detection: What is media bias,

how it is expressed, and how to detect it. Expert Syst. Appl. 237, (March 2024), 121641. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2023.121641

[79] Lambèr Royakkers, Jelte Timmer, Linda Kool, and Rinie van Est. 2018. Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20, 2 (June 2018),

127 142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-018-9452-X/TABLES/1

[80] Alan M. Rubin, Elizabeth M. Perse, and Robert A. Powell. 1985. Loneliness, Parasocial Interaction, And Local Television News Viewing. Hum.

Commun. Res. 12, 2 (December 1985), 155 180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2958.1985.TB00071.X

[81] Henrik Rydenfelt. 2022. Transforming media agency? Approaches to automation in Finnish legacy media. New Media Soc. 24, 12 (March 2022), 2598

2613. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821998705

[82] Henrik Rydenfelt, Lauri Haapanen, Jesse Haapoja, and Tuukka Lehtiniemi. 2024. Personalisation in Journalism: Ethical insights and blindspots in

Finnish legacy media. Journalism 25, 2 (November 2024), 313 333. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221138424

[83] Henrik Rydenfelt, Tuukka Lehtiniemi, Jesse Haapoja, and Lauri Haapanen. 2025. Autonomy and Algorithms: Tracing the Significance of Content

Personalization. Int. J. Commun. 19, 0 (January 2025), 20. Retrieved January 27, 2025 from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/23474

[84] Aljosha Karim Schapals, Colin Porlezza, and Rodrigo Zamith. 2020. Assistance or Resistance? Evaluating the Intersection of Automated Journalism

and Journalistic Role Conceptions. Media Commun. 8, 3 (July 2020), 16 26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17645/MAC.V8I3.3054

[85] Jordan Richard Schoenherr, Roba Abbas, Katina Michael, Pablo Rivas, and Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson. 2023. Designing AI Using a Human-

Centered Approach: Explainability and Accuracy Toward Trustworthiness. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 4, 1 (March 2023), 9 23.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3257627

[86] Rifat Ara Shams, · Didar Zowghi, and · Muneera Bano. 2023. AI and the quest for diversity and inclusion: a systematic literature review. AI Ethics

2023 (November 2023), 1 28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S43681-023-00362-W

[87] Donghee Shin and Shuhua Zhou. 2024. A Value and Diversity-Aware News Recommendation Systems: Can Algorithmic Gatekeeping Nudge Readers

to View Diverse News? Journal. Mass Commun. Q. (June 2024).

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241246680/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_10776990241246680-FIG3.JPEG

[88] Felix M. Simon. 2024. Artificial Intelligence in the News: How AI Retools, Rationalizes, and Reshapes Journalism and the Public Arena. Columbia

Journalism Review. Retrieved August 29, 2024 from https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/artificial-intelligence-in-the-news.php

[89] Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2018. Intimate futures: Staying with the trouble of digital personal assistants through

design fiction. DIS 2018 - Proc. 2018 Des. Interact. Syst. Conf. (June 2018), 869 880.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196766/SUPPL_FILE/DISFP430.MP4

[90] Catherine Sotirakou and Constantinos Mourlas. 2016. A Gamified News Application for Mobile Devices: An Approach that Turns Digital News

Readers into Players of a Social Network. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 9599, (2016),

480 493. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_53

[91] [92] Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. MIT Press.

Miriam Sturdee, Paul Coulton, Joseph G. Lindley, Mike Stead, Haider Ali Akmal, and Andy Hudson-Smith. 2016. Design fiction: How to build a

voight-kampff machine. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 07-12-May-, (May 2016), 375 385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892574

[93] Edson C. Tandoc and Soo Kwang Oh. 2017. Small Departures, Big Continuities? Journal. Stud. 18, 8 (August 2017), 997 1015.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1104260

[94] Neil Thurman, Seth C. Lewis, and Jessica Kunert. 2019. Algorithms, Automation, and News. Digit. Journal. 7, 8 (2019), 980 992.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1685395

[95] Tamás Tóth, Manuel Goyanes, Márton Demeter, and Francisco Campos-Freire. 2022. Social Implications of Paywalls in a Polarized Society:

Stud. Big Data 97, (2022), 169 179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-

88028-6_13

[96] Tommaso Turchi, Alessio Malizia, and Simone Borsci. 2024. Reflecting on Algorithmic Bias With Design Fiction: The MiniCoDe Workshops. IEEE

Intell. Syst. 39, 2 (March 2024), 40 50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2024.3352977

[97] tember 11, 2024

from https://books.google.com/books/about/Antisocial_Media.html?id=h05WDwAAQBAJ

[98] [99] Stephen J. Ward. 2019. Journalism ethics. In The handbook of journalism studies. Taylor & Francis, 307 323.

Stephen John Anthony Ward. 2015. The invention of journalism ethics: The path to objectivity and beyond. McGill- -MQUP.

[100] mated journalism.

Journalism 22, 1 (January 2021), 86 103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918757072/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1464884918757072-

FIG1.JPEG

[101] Richmond Y. Wong, Deirdre K. Mulligan, Ellen Van Wyk, James Pierce, and John Chuang. 2017. Eliciting values reflections by engaging privacy

futures using design workbooks. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 1, CSCW (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3134746

[102] Richmond Y Wong and Vera Khovanskaya. 2018. Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. Comput. Interact.

2, (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10

[103] Nan Yu and Jun Kong. 2016. User experience with web browsing on small screens: Experimental investigations of mobile-page interface design and

homepage design for news websites. Inf. Sci. (Ny). 330, (February 2016), 427 443. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INS.2015.06.004

[104] Mi Zhou, Vibhanshu Abhishek, Timothy Derdenger, Jaymo Kim, and Kannan Srinivasan. 2024. Bias in Generative AI. (March 2024). Retrieved

January 23, 2025 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02726v1

27[105] John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Research through design in HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI, Judith S. Olson and Wendy A. Kellogg (eds.).

Springer New York, New York, 167 189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8

3 notes · View notes