#Syscourse adjacent

[mewos-laptop]

I rlly don't enjoy being separated from the CDD community just bc I'm not an exclusionist and support endos, actually

The idea that I'm somehow less of a system/disordered than other CDDs is rlly disheartening and rlly ableist, and it doesn't feel good to know that such a vocal minority of my community doesn't support me and doesn't want me in my OWN COMMUNITY because of my stance on my fellow plural folks

I genuinely love being able to connect with non disordered folks, and I feel safe in endo spaces, but I wish I felt safe in CDD spaces as well

[snezhnayan-nights]

"your doctor knows better than you" are you a doctor. how can i trust you. i don't. stop.

please shut up and stop acting like your insensitive and misinforming opinions as gospel.

i don't like you.

[cdd-safe-haven]

A history of trauma can make peace feel like boredom

I'm bored.

Are you bored?

Maybe you're unsettled, unsure, anxious, or irritable

Maybe sometimes it feels like boredom

Why?

My entire life I searched for peace and calm, and I've always been told that happiness will follow it

So why am I unsatisfied?

Dr. Nicole LePera said this:

When leaving trauma cycles, expect to be bored. That’s a good sign. You’re leaving the cycle of emotion addiction:

When we’re used to cycles of chronic stress, drama, and overwhelm, we get stuck in fight or flight. Cortisol and adrenaline are a constant in the body.

We subconsciously seek this environment to feel alive or “like ourselves”.

...

When the body is coming out of chronic nervous system dysregulation, there is a transition phase. No longer getting constant spikes of cortisol we might feel bored, restless, or irritated.

Boredom is healthy. It does take some getting used to. You’ll be surprised at how much you subconsciously feel a pull towards emotional activation.

...

We have not evolved to be in cycles of chronic stress that never end.

It will be unfamiliar, at first. Soon, it will feel like peace.

Many trauma survivors report a vague sense of emptiness and boredom when they are not angry, under duress, or involved in activities that activate emotional responses. Reexposure to trauma is known to act as a pain reliever, equivalent to 8mg of morphine.

We crave the release of dopamine and endorphins that follow stress, something we're used to and understand-- something that makes us feel alive and active

The question then becomes,

Are there healthy ways to engage with activities that give you that "kick"?

I'd like to think there are.

Mindfulness, attention to the people in your close inner circles, and frequent breaks are just a few small steps.

Does anyone have any tips or stories? Maybe another perspective?

[eepy-demon]

A "trauma disorder" is any disorder actually categorized as such, ableism towards people who experience delusions isn't cool, calling fictionkin folk and a fair number of fictives delusional for their identities isn't cool, threatening people (even as a joke) isn't cool, the world is literally ending please get it together

[angstydevil]

The map is not the territory. In regards to geopolitics, this means a map of the world is a representation, not reality itself. Borders change. Landmasses change. The words used to label depictions of certain regions reflect temporal motivations. The landmasses labeled North America and South America are named after an Italian mapmaker and have not been named as such for many millennia. The names on the globe reflect historical ideological movements.

The concept of a world map entirely covered in nationstates with well-defined borders is relatively new. This reflects a particular ideology in which states are things that occupy landmasses and contain people, rather than material realities constructed by social agreements between individuals.

Even satellite maps are photographs: they are representations of reality, and they are distinct from the real world in various ways. If satellite maps are presented as the most cutting edge and accurate way of depicting Earth as it really is, that too reflects a bias toward seeing what the world “really is” in a particular way.

The map is not the territory. In regards to psychiatry, this means that a catalogue of behaviours maligned as syndromes written by clubs of predominantly white western cisgender men is not a holy almanac of extant neurological deviations from some universal standard of reason.

Psychiatry is a violent institution at its roots. The concepts of sanity and madness are inextricable from racism and colonialism. American psychiatry emerged from the practice of allowing slaveholders the “right” to have captive people they held in involuntary servitude declared “mentally unfit” or “insane”.

Psychiatry remains a violent institution. It is an extension of western fetishization of “rationalism”; it rationalizes unpersoning. It holds that madpeople are without “reason”, a notion that for many intents and purposes is a sanitized synonym of soul, and therefore madpeople must be caged. It offers a “scientific” and “rational” dogma of “degeneracy”.

Psychiatry is interlinked with the prison industrial complex and is one of the principal institutions to which the term “institutional racism” applies. American psychiatry diagnoses black bodied people with oppositional defiant disorder, antisocial personality disorder, schizophrenia, and cognitive disabilities at higher rates than white bodied people, simultaneously villainizing and constructing blackness as a social and material reality, villainizing and constructing particular categories of disability as categories to be marginalized and medically neglected, and perpetuating racialist ideologies while frequently aligning with eugenicist initiatives. Psychiatry is a part of a system that determines who is free and who is unfree, and that system serves and protects inequalities as its foundational purpose.

Psychiatry creates an idea of mental illness that's very attractive as a pejorative among liberals and conservatives, e.g., Conservativism/liberalism should be considered a mental illness (and therefore conservatives/liberals should be unfree). This kind of thinking also appears on the auth-left, e.g., I think money should be considered a delusion (and therefore capitalists should be unfree). Psychiatry constructs, enforces, and regulates categories of “undesirables”.

No one derives rights and validity from the DSM. American queer people did not feel protected by homosexuality's status as a diagnosis in the DSM, and they rioted and organized until it was removed as a diagnosis in 1974. Trans people deserve freedom and rights because everyone deserves freedom and rights, not because the American Psychiatric Association recognizes gender dysphoria as a diagnosis.

Psychiatry does not champion the rights of people it diagnoses. In the words of Frantz Fanon, “Psychiatry is an auxiliary of the police.” Psychiatrists police communities, and they do so with the same violent racist, sexist, cisheteronormative prejudices endogenous to police departments.

Psychiatrists, like police officers, have the right to arbitrarily detain people. Psychiatrists are gatekeepers between people and inalienable rights to medicine and drugs. Psychiatrists participate in the othering and erasure of people who experience trauma, especially generational and societal trauma. Psychiatrists actively construct a colonial narrative in which there exists an ideal (white, sane, able bodied) rational human standard from which there is (“degenerate”) deviation. Psychiatrists kidnap and imprison people. Psychiatrists swear oaths to kidnap and imprison people. Psychiatrists rarely face charges or even lose their licenses to practice when their abuses are well documented - and, in general, most abuses are not well documented.

Psychiatry’s existence as an institution opposes absolute rights to bodily autonomy. Psychiatry prohibits poor, sick, and disabled people people from accessing lifesaving medicine. Psychiatry disproportionately denies people of color access to treatments entirely by applying “untreatable” diagnoses.

Medicalist gatekeepers are bullies shilling for a cruel establishment. They routinely accuse their harassment targets of faking disorders, being delusional, and having personality disorders, and they routinely invalidate people using a variety of slurs originally directed at people diagnosed with psychosis, autism, cognitive impairment, and paraphilias as pejoratives.

All these pejoratives are associated with diagnoses in the DSM. Medicalist gatekeepers use them to invalidate and harass others because they’ve integrated the beliefs that psychiatric propagandists peddle: that belonging to those diagnostic criteria makes you ontologically worth less and less “rational” than a sane, abled being; deserving of unfreedom; “degenerate”—without “reason”.

At the crux of their arguments, they say, you’re not like me, you’re like those bad madpeople – or, even more insidiously, I don’t believe what you say about yourself as much as I believe what psychiatry says about you.

If you find yourself thinking, “well of course we have to have an objective viewpoint to really understand this phenomenon - people like that aren’t fully rational!” then you believe unpersoning propaganda.

[aceclipse]

still wild to me how majority of systems i meet and know have factives, yet factives themselves seem to be much less talked about and/or respected simply because they involve real people.

[anomalymon]

Me: so I'm a fictive but not an introject because the term is heavily associated with psychological origins and I don't really fit with the medical definition, not all fictives are introjects and headmates with spiritual origins like me don't really fit it

People: oh so you're gatekeeping introject? you're saying endogenic systems can't use introject? how dare you

[ashys-mogai]

Boy-adjacent

Boy-adjacent is described to be a "boy" but slightly to the left. It's on the masc-aligned spectrum but the experience cannot just simply be described by the word boy. This can be paired with other identities or standalone.

Coined 04/20/24

Image ID under the cut

[Image ID start: Five horizontal striped flag. The stripes' colours from top to bottom are as follows. Darkish yellow green, pastel seafoam green, white with a tinge of yellowish green, soft pastel green, and darkish seafoam green. Image ID end]

[circular-bircular]

why are you trying to collect sources disproving endogenic plurality?

Because so far, I haven’t found a single one, despite so many people claiming they have. 🤷 I must be missing something.

[wizardpeebis]

dude, endos are VISCIOUS. like. i reblogged a few anti endo posts because i am a traumagen system who does not like to see their safe spaces gentrified by ppl forcing themselves into a disorder that’s ruined my life and continues to affect it in ways that are not net positive.

so then i got an ask that was p clearly designed to induce paranoia (i’m guessing they dug through my blog a bit and gathered that i’m schizo-affective) and god forbid i reply to a pro endo post that’s entirely misinformative about all systems, because i’ll be met with the most conniving, passive aggressive, and just plain mean remarks.

the real thing that gets me is that all of their oppression is entirely self imposed. they invade spaces, demand attention, and when they’re told that what they’re doing is wrong, they throw a tantrum and start linking twitter threads with cherry picked evidence about how right they are. they make up buzzwords that are just plain bastardizations of terms related to trans history and oppression, and that is not unintentional. it is a purposeful play on language to heighten the sense of a liberation front for something that simply does not exist. manipulation like that is outright disgusting, and i have no problem thinking less of people who believe that it is okay.

i am especially mad at all the misinformation that gets spread? as someone who is figuring their system out and trying to learn things, misinformation can be extremely dangerous for me and it’s more than disheartening to think i’ve learned something new only to see “pro endo” in the tags and realize that i can’t trust a word i’ve just read. i don’t get why they can’t at least keep it to themselves if they can’t just shut up about it forever and always.

i’m just. eugh. i’m so sick of people in general taking oppressed identities and tacking them on as personality traits for brownie points and endos are an amazing punching bag ❤️

[sophieinwonderland]

ngl i always thought all typing quirks were for semiverbal/alterverbal ppl, we didn't even know ppl use em otherwise outsidea that. Only ppl we have in our system that use quirks r altverbal and literally cannot speak otherwise, but its kinda cool people choose to do it

Huh. That's interesting. So this helps the semiverbal alters communicate better?

I've actually never really thought about this much, but I'm kind of interested in the mechanics of this. Do you think this has something to do with how the brain processes language? Like how some people can communicate better with song when they have trouble speaking words normally?

[mewos-laptop]

Tired of seeing content abt plural suffering flood so many conversations around plurality

We're lucky enough to follow folks who usually aren't doomerposting when it comes to their plurality, but every once in a while we'll see smth from outside our circle that's rlly upsetting, and tbh it makes us feel like so many ppl who claim to "love" plural folks really just want our sob stories, and to hear abt how we hate being plural, and how we wish we were "normal," but that's just not true for so many of us, and I'm frustrated that that's all so many singlets (or hell, even plurals themselves) seem to care abt

And the thing is, I KNOW that so many folks in the plural community DESPERATELY NEED to see positive content, and love to see it, bc our posts spreading that positivity (when we tag them), end up getting a lot of notes !! It's just hard to see that sometimes when there's so little positive content outside of sarcastic "haha headmates, am I right ?" posts, sometimes even from plurals who actually DO hate being plural

I want to be able to celebrate what we have as a collection of people, and I want others to be able to do the same. Plurality and systemhood isn't a death sentence, and it shouldn't feel like one, nor be portrayed as one

[snezhnayan-nights]

it’s impossible to have a reasonable conversation with people about why ramcoa is a dangerous term to use that harms communities targeted by the satanic panic and more current forms of those conspiracies like qanon pizzagate stuff because they will never listen and will throw a fit every time they’re asked to please please stop spreading this stuff. we CAN’T have a conversation because they refuse to take any information that remotely challenges their right to keep their special word. I understand they like using it and want to keep it for various reasons but you can’t always have everything that makes you feel good in the world. any attempt to have this conversation is shouted down as policing survivors - as if survivor status means a person can never be wrong or be held accountable for the harm they’re doing.

if a term is created out of bigotry and conspiracy then it is unsalvageable. this term was created out of bigotry and conspiracy. it might feel scary and unfair to lose it but that’s one of the awful parts about trauma. sometimes it’s unfair. sometimes there just ISNT a word that is both vague enough and specific enough for these peoples very exacting standards as they consistently reject every alternative suggested to them. they will accept nothing but continuing to propagate this conspiracy term.

they say it’s unrelated to the satanic panic. when they’re shown proof they say well okay it doesn’t matter im reclaiming it (as if that’s something they get to reclaim). it doesn’t matter, I WANT to use it. it doesn’t matter, that’s not real antisemitism anyway are you trying to say jews are satanists? sounds like YOURE the antisemetic one. it doesn’t matter, this word is important to me. they say that bigoted conspiracy theorists creating it has no bearing on its meaning and move the goalposts every time we try to show what we’re saying. no evidence is ever enough.

what conversation are we - jews in plural communities and survivor communities - supposed to have here? we can’t. we get accused of policing language because bigotry and dangerous conspiracies are meaningless next to people online getting to feel validated in one very highly specific way. we get told we’re bullying survivors because we get upset when we’re repeatedly ignored and told to shut up and stop trying to get people to care about our historic and continuing persecution (the connection between satanic panic and blood libel is WELL documented). we get told there was no antisemitism in the satanic panic in the first place. are we SURE we actually experience anything bad? aren’t we just big bad liars?

please. please tell me what we can do to get people to listen to us. because nothing works. fucking of course we’re a little upset and a little less than polite at this point. people are outright saying they don’t care that they’re parroting the vocabulary of people who want us eradicated because it’s important to them. because we don’t matter. we will never be safe in survivor communities and when we’re upset about that and angry that no one will listen we get told, again, that we are the problem.

oh boy. i'm not sure how to start this response. i'll preface this with the fact that i am simply a teen who is watching all of this happen and wanted to say something, since all the fighting while i'm trying to navigate through system tags is getting to me.

the "conversation" part, isn't just directed at one party. i meant it to everyone, as it just looks like everyone is making points and slamming at each other like unstoppable force vs immovable object. i'm also referring to the people who keep spamming anons to people who either say "ramcoa is antisemitic!" and "people can still use ramcoa!". more so aggressive anons.

i can't do much. i don't know much. a lot of us can't do much and none of us can automatically change each other's minds. i'm sorry that i don't know how to help you. i understand where your anger is coming from. i'm sorry that this is hurting you and you don't feel heard.

[vagabndz]

GUN SYSTEM

flag for systems that have connections or themes surrounding guns

can also be used if your system just likes guns idgaf

not an origin + no syscourse cause i retain sanity also i dont tolerate columbine dickriders and their adjacent parties

tagging: @radiomogai

[ashys-mogai]

Girlboy-adjacent

Girlboy-adjacent or boygirl-adjacent is described to be a "girlboy" or "boygirl" but slightly to the left of the binaries. The experience cannot just simply be described by the word girlboy or boygirl. This can be paired with other identities or standalone.

Coined 04/20/24

Image ID under the cut

[Image ID start: Five horizontal striped flag. The flag has two colours on each stripe and the colours look like they make a staircase effect from top left to bottom right. Each stripes colours from top to bottom are as follows. Darkish rose red and darkish yellow green, pastel lilac purple and pastel seafoam green, white with a tinge of pink and white with a tinge of yellowish green, soft pastel pink and soft pastel green, and darkish purple and darkish seafoam green. Image ID end]

[radflag-cemetery]

Sylasqueer ;; 💬💢🌈 (or just 💬💢)

Sylasqueer is a –queer label which describes someone who is "technically" or "bordering" radqueer but is nervous about labelling themselves as such due to stigmatization and hate that radqueers often receive. These people are often pacifistic but still opinionated.

Sylasqueer is pro:

– respecting everyone regardless of identity

– consent & bodily autonomy

– self expression

– radqueer ideologies

– all paraphilias (including the "big 3")

– kink

– all transIDs and transID adjacent labels (ex: terms that are made to be "watered down" transIDs)

– shipping ("media doesn't always reflect reality")

– pacifism / green ideology

– contradictory / good faith labels (including lesboys/turigirls, mspecs, etc)

– otherkin / alterhuman identities

Sylasqueer is anti:

– harassment

– nonconsensual harm

– discourse (syscourse, kincourse, etc. someone who is sylasqueer is likely syscopunk, kff neutral, and similar things)

– sexism towards any sex (including intersex & male.)

– demonization of anyone (including radqueers, anti radqueers, etc. any group.)

– gatekeeping of terms and resources

– "thought crime" as a concept

– racism, ageism, ableism, anti-semitism, homophobia, transphobia, etc (all discriminatory viewpoints)

– demonization and stereotyping of plurality

This was made for a friend. If you have any additional questions about this term, please ask. Do not make assumptions.

With the tags, I am not cross-tagging. You do not have to be radqueer to use this. You also don't have to be non-radqueer to use it. This is intended for everyone. Get over yourself if you have a problem with it.