#cogitari

[windofthegods]

Khan Temp Late Shuns Thoughts thinking thoughts  of thoughts thinking thoughts...

[your-rutherfurr]

𝙸𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝 ○•°

Haiii!! You can call me Silwa, Atsushi, Q or Rutherfurr

I'm archangelkin, Atsushi and Yumeno kin, unnaturalkin, tiger paratype, anime-figurekin, vocaloidkin & aesthetickin

I'm a hazardqueer, paxiqueer, hugqueer & trufflequeer!

My pronouns are they/any neos

Enbian Gaybian

Genderfluid, pangender, agender and kingender

cogitari/fictosexual and Igcecidimus (labels constantly changing)

Romance and sex oscillating

I have a stamp collecting addiction (my storage is suffering)

I love emo, electronic, trance, and many other types of music

Autistic & maybe npd or hpd or bpd

I LOVE BUNGO STRAY DOGS‼️‼️💥💞

My personality type is ENFP-T :D

I mostly post abt otherkin stuff, lgbtqia+, I coin flags at times, & post abt Bungo Stray Dogs. On the very rare occasion I post abt neurodivergence

EXCLUSIONISTS

TERFS AND SWERFS

SAFEQUEERS & RADQUEERS

TRANSID, TRANSAGE, TRANSRACE & TRANSABLED

TRANSMEDS

TRANSPHOBES & HOMOPHOBES

ANTI XENO/NEOPRONOUNS

ANTI MICROLABELS

ANTI MOGAI

ANTI OTHERKIN/THERIAN

ANTI XENOGENDER

ANTI MSPEC MONO

ANTI AGERE

ABLEISTS

ANTI-ENDOS

ZIONISTS(used 🇮🇱 to wipe my ass, not even, my poop would get offended)

I know a dni list won't completely stop ppl from interacting or harassing but I hope you have enough respect for other ppl's boundaries.

And if your a rage baiter and decide to choose my blog as your next form of entertainment; I'll be blocking you.

[aplatonic-culture-is]

https://www.tumblr.com/aplatonic-culture-is/736208880820977664/cogitariplatonic-culture-is-wanting-friends-only

Cogiwhatie? 😵😵😵

If I'm not mistaken, cogitari- is an aspec prefix that denotes attraction only experienced within your own head, that it's not really acted upon.

[arco-pluris]

Hello If you see this I would appreciate the Help. I am a guy and I have always been very very attracted to men they are physically hot, and i am also sexually attracted to them. When I think of guys I always think of having a future together and I look forward to relationships with them, I always get butterflies as well Ik that’s very gay. But when it comes to women I feel bad cause the only time I ever liked one was one girl from my old school, and i didn’t see the fact that she was a girl I just liked her for her, I thought of dating her and had sexual feelings towards her as well ( I said she was my one exception some other gay friends said it’s not common but there are some whom are rare but do experience this ) I never went with her but I did think of it. But fast forward to today when I think of women their chest just doesn’t attract me in any way, when some dress in front of me cause I’m gay and they think I wouldn’t like them which I just don’t feel any any attraction to women when they dress in front of me, or any butterflies in my stomach when looking at them and I don’t even plan our future. I do get sad tho because I want to like women but I just don’t and don’t get me wrong they are extremely gorgeous but I just don’t really feel anything. But when I’m looking at a video of them in a tight fitted dress sometimes I accidentally look at their outfit at their chest area ofc I don’t stare cause I don’t want to make them uncomfortable but I think omg their outfits are such a slay but sometimes in the very rare occasions I always ask myself am I attracted to this or do I find this hot. And sometimes I’d search up women on those yk “sites” to see do I like this and most times I see and then I’m like well I don’t feel anything, but I’m the very slight chance I sometimes find the situation hot and that makes me think the woman is hot. And Ik you can find ppl attractive without being attracted to them but sometimes I’m sexually attracted to them but only if I come across them on a site. Cause I’m the occasion that a woman irl comes into me I don’t feel anything and I feel nothing. No sexual interest when they actually do something or romantic. But if it’s online from a site cause I was looking at men and came across them I end up finding it hot and am attracted to them but only in the moment. Cause day to day life I’d see how gorgeous women can be and I just don’t feel anything. When it’s a man tho I don’t have to ask if I like this, and when I see them I feel butterflies as well as the tension. But women in person I don’t even feel sexual tension I’m a confusing person..

Please help idk what’s wrong with my feelings and I’m wondering if I’m still valid as gay ? Or is there a term or sexuality or whatever to describe how I am or something ? Honestly any input would help ofc only if you can, cause I’m so confused right now.

(anon sent october 27)

nothing wrong. bold of you to think I would be the one to say something is wrong. but at least I feel these feelings are very common. the thing is: would you still be curious about it? because I consider being curious a defining identity for some, including myself.

another thing to look at is: borea-, gynecurious (or heterocurious), androflexible, minflex, maflex, try-, pre-, cupiogex, and merascic.

you could be a merasscic gynecurious/homoflexible (aniso-).

if you find these forms of attraction get blurry or mixed together, try aestheti-, apres-, or quoi-.

you could also question yourself if that's really attraction or it's desire (libido/stimulus) or corporeal response. idk if you'd be worried with comphet or not. cogitari- or poeti- could be used together with a femaric/fin- identity.

[imoga-pride]

are there any labels for when youre a certain gender but in your own kind of way or through your own lens?

autogender? or cogitarigender (based on cogitarisexual)? that's what comes to my mind

[momma-mogai-sphinx]

Cogitari- Flags

Cogitari-: when you only experience attraction within your own head (you don’t act on it, you don’t try to interact with the person, etc.)

Cogitari

Cogitariromantic

Cogitarisexual

Cogitarisensual

Cogitariaesthetic

Cogitariplatonic

Cogitariqplatonic

Cogitarialterous

-

Stripe Meanings:

The dark grey on the outer edges of the flag symbolize the "walls" of ones mind, where the bright red represents the "welling up" of attraction (and the lighter shade represents how it may fluctuate in intensity). As the black of the asexual flag represents a lack of attractions, so the black of the cogitari flag stands for a lack of any desire to act on one's attractions.

—

If you have any problems with any of these flag designs, please let me know. I may take the post down & will certainly do my best to correct the issue.🦋

[mtg-player1]

11 & 18 for the aro ask game

What is something you wish people knew about being aro-spec?

I mean, the masses I wish just new about it lol. I've personally taught someone what it means, no one knows what it means.

But for those who've (barely) heard about it. I wish they knew that there are different ways to be aro: loveless/lovequeer/heartless etc, non-partnering/partnering, romance repulsed/averse/favorable, fray/demi/cogitari/cupio/lith etc. etc. and that not all aros are ace.

Do you have any aro-spec headcanons?

I'd say saiki k, but that's as close to canon it's going to get. He's said "romantic feelings elude me", but yeah, he's at least my favorite aroace character. Honestly he kinda fits the bill of non-partnering loveless romance averse, in addition to possibly being aplatonic? Idk. It's been a while since I saw it.

Sasha from the antagonist's pet on Tapas (cupioro and maybe oriented/angled aroace). Her sexual orientation is never really brought up, but her romantic orientation is a bit relevant. She could be alloro, but yeah.

Kitsa Lavene from DemON by kio-kio on Tapas (aroallo). The concept of romance is like completely foreign to him, and it's not really something he's interested in. He does some questionable thing in the comic, but he's an interesting character. He ends up in a romantic relationship at one point, honestly curious to see how that works for him.

[mogaimom]

Hi are you familiar with the cogitari- orientation? If so, could you tell me what the difference could be between Aegoromantic and cogitariromantic is? I tried to find a difference but they seem (to me) very VERY similar so it was hard... thanks if you can help!!

From what I can tell, aegoromanticism doesn’t necessarily involve experiencing romantic attraction (just a theoretical interest in romance itself), while cogatariromanticism does.

[mogaivultures]

ok intro post time!!

hello and welcome to mogaivultures!

this is mostly just a general pride blog (mogai centric)

Mod Harpy is 15, male, gay, and hoards aro microlabels (main ones are apothi, bellus, and cogitari). Mod Harpy uses he/him pronouns, but it/it's are ok if not used in a negative light or by cis people. formerly known as Mod Zero on our microlabel specific blog @oxigenders

Mod Crow is a minor (would prefer not to state age), boyflux, aceflux, aroflux, and marsic. Mod Crow uses all pronouns, but He/Him and They/Them are preferred. formerly known as Mod Void on our microlabel specific blog @oxigenders

Mod Bluejay is 15, demiflorer, and angled aroace. Mod Bluejay uses he/they/it/ze/vi pronouns. He is also known as Mod Null on the microlabel specific blog @oxigenders. His main blog is @xenomothe.

Mod Jazz is 14, lesbian, and falls under the nonbinary umbrella. Mod Jazz uses fae/faer, ter/terr pronouns along with they/them incase anyone has trauma related to those neos specifically. Fae’s known as Mod Jazz on @oxigenders as well, and hoards genders and pronouns to help faer explain faerself. 

mod redtail is 19, nonbinary/bigender/xenogender, gay oriented aroace, and uses it/its and neopronouns and uses he/she alternating as an auxillary set. it is nonbinary genderselkie and xenic/kenic/fem-aligned. it is a jackdawhoarder, turkeyhoarder, magpiehoarder & seagullhoarder. it is known as mod mimikyu on @oxigenders. you can ask for its identity carrd/blog/pronoun page off anon.

All Mods have significant issues with reading and reading comprehension along with anger issues

we will try our best to avoid discourse, but here are our stances on some issues just for good measure

-pro non dysphoric trans people

-acab

-all mods are Big Mean Ole antis who think glorifying pedophilia is bad, romanticizing abuse is bad, shipping real people is bad, and shipping weird age gaps (ie. 12yo x 16yo, 18yo x 40yo, basic shit) is bad. (we are also against porn of fictional minors, yes, even aged up ones)

- aspec inclusionists

- pro well reaserched self diagnosis

if there's some kinda discourse without a stance listed here it's either because we haven't heard about it, don't have an opinion on it, or don't think it's our place to speak on such issues

here's our Dni ig:

-general dni crit (racists, pedophiles, etc)

-truscum/transmeds/whatever you stinky bastards are calling yourselves this week

-terfs/swerfs

-support autism speaks

-pan/ace exclusionist

-nsfw blogs/18+ blogs

[quod-quid-erat-esse]

Así pues, Señor, tú que das la inteligencia de la fe, concédeme -en la medida en que sabes que me conviene- que entienda que existes como lo creemos y que eres lo que creemos. Y creemos ciertamente que eres algo de lo cual nada mayor puede ser pensado [quo maius cogitari nequit].\ Pero ¿y si no existe una naturaleza tal? pues «el insensato ha dicho en su corazón: Dios no existe». Sin embargo, el propio insensato cuando oye esto mismo que digo: «algo de lo cual nada mayor puede ser pensado», entiende lo que oye, y lo que entiende está en su entendimiento, aunque no entienda que esto exista. Pues una cosa es que algo exista en el entendimiento, y otra entender que esto existe. Así cuando el pintor piensa de antemano lo que va a hacer, lo tiene en el entendimiento, aunque no entiende que exista lo que todavía no ha hecho. Cuando efectivamente ya lo ha pintado, lo tiene en el entendimiento y entiende que existe lo que ya ha realizado. Por tanto, el insensato debe admitir que existe al menos en su entendimiento algo de lo cual nada mayor puede ser pensado, ya que cuando lo oye lo entiende, y todo lo que se entiende está en el entendimiento. Y, ciertamente, aquello de lo cual nada mayor podemos pensar no puede existir solamente en el entendimiento. Si existiese sólo en el entendimiento, se podría pensar que existiese también en la realidad, lo cual es mayor. Por tanto, si aquello de lo cual nada mayor puede ser pensado estuviera sólo en la inteligencia, esto mismo de lo cual nada mayor puede ser pensado sería/ algo de lo cual podemos pensar algo mayor. Pero esto no puede ser. Existe, pues, sin género de duda, algo de lo cual no cabe pensar nada mayor, y esto tanto en la inteligencia como en la realidad

Anselmo de Canterbury  “Proslogion”

[ddavis86-blog]

A DEMONS SERMON: COGITARI

"The idle mind is a dangerous place to be left in"-Anderson. Paak Only when we listen to our thoughts, only then will we understand how powerful we truly are. In the hopes of understanding the world we live in, unintentionally we find ourselves setting obstacles. These hindrances later become the lessons we identify by. Is the discomfort of man the only educational advantage we possess? Some would argue that pain is an incentive, which assures a lesson learned. As the inhibitors and creators of our reality, those that display the most control, show the patience and discipline necessary to learn, as well as progress in the many avenues of life. People become dependent on pain of ignorance; it’s then later disguised as our world, which in turn becomes what we pass on as reality to future generations. If we are the architects, and what we want is a better world, then why advocate for things that don’t better our thought?

[imoga-pride]

I have seen that you know a lot about sexuality and gender things, so I have a question for you. I am a born female and identity as such. I am attracted to men and just assumed I was straight. However, I’ve noticed a lot of my fictional and celeb crushes are bi and pan. I also have little sexual interests right now, which i think is unusual, given my age (I’m 15). I think I might fall somewhere on the asexual scale. but is there a term for someone like me who seems to be attracted to bi/pan men? Or is it just a coincidence? And lastly can you be straight and ace?

Okay. I actually get where you're coming from and you seem to be very cautious about such things. If/when you are attracted to multiple men, I think you could use plurian, but that only quantifies your attraction. The only identifier I know that nuances orientation is panamory/panamorous, but that specifies the lack of dependence towards orientations [capability of relationships with many kinds of partners regardless of their sexual orientation or gender(s)].

Now, if the attractions you experience are only inside your mind, you could be cogitari- (only experiencing attraction within your own head).

Obviously, as wlm (julietians, women loving/liking men) are culturally conditioned to be attracted to straight men, I noticed it. The consensus is that the other person's orientation shouldn't affect your attraction towards em. You'd still be str8 but you can always use amative terms for your circumstantial attractions (in the sense of asexual spectrum and grey areas). So you could be still mono- (attracted to one gender).

Other orientations you could take a look is poeti-, ficto-, procul-, cele-. Not judging people with such orientations, but in my point of view, they are forms of escapism. Nothing wrong with that, as they are Neptunine traits. Because you're still not attracted to people in real life, right?! But think with me: you're always welcome in rethinking your labels and renaming them, they don't need to be forever, in the future there could be a specific label you'd better identify than all of those I mentioned.

[momma-mogai-sphinx]

Cogitariromantic flag requested by anon.

Cogitariromantic - You only experience romantic attraction within your own head (you don’t act on it, you don’t try to interact with the person, etc.)

-

The original cogitarisexual flag didn't lend itself very well to my "attractional" formatting, so I hope the flag's creator doesn't mind me adding an extra stripe. I also went ahead and remade the flag, since the BMPF version, while a fine flag, is just a bit odd to me. You can find a whole set of my own cogitari- flags here.

HQ Downloads: (1) (2)

[story-monster]

6 Evil Creatures (That Live in Your House!)

You might not know this, but there are dozens of horrible, terrible, villainous little creatures living in your house.

No, not your kids…(nice thought, though.)  Chances are, you’ve never seen these little monsters.  But they’re around you.  All around you.  Every day.  All day.

There’s one above you right now.

Don’t panic.  I know of ways to get rid of them.  I’ve put together a list…a list of 6 of ’em that torment your life daily.  And, I tell you how to get rid of them.  As they say, knowing is half the battle!

1. The Camera Phone Gnome  (Pernicium Picturus)

This is a little gnome that lives inside your phone.  He’s about the size of a grain of rice.  He wears a little red hat and matching leggings that he hasn’t washed in years.

(He lives up by the camera lens.)

Anyway.  Every time you see something beautiful–like the way light glistens on a pool, or the full moon last Friday–you want to take a picture, right?

Somewhere, between the lens and the microchips of the camera, the Camera Gnome interferes.

And your picture turns out super crummy.

Happens every time.

Prevention/Cure:  Take a billion pictures of every meal you eat.  Cold cereal, toast, everything.

This won’t actually get rid of the Gnome…it just gets even with it.

2.  The Art Repulser (Malus Artem Criticus)

This little guy lives at the bottom of your garbage can.  He wears a vest and is smelly.  He kind of looks like Captain Picard.

Mostly he just minds his own business, until

Your kid gives you a piece of artwork they drew themselves

and of course you’re crazy about it, because you’re a good parent

which unfortunately causes the kid to draw a billion more pictures of the exact same thing

(I was this kid so I feel justified in making fun of it)

Eventually you can’t see your fridge anymore.

You get tired of the clutter and when your kid isn’t looking…

You throw it all out but are very careful to make sure you stuff it down LOW in the garbage can because the last thing your kid needs to know is that you threw away their beautiful artwork!

Of course, the Art Repulser is having none of that.

The next time your kid goes to throw something away…

Nooooooooooo

You’re a terrible parent.  You’re the worst.

Don’t worry…your kid never throws anything away, so you should be fine.

Prevention/Cure:  Encourage your child to become an accountant.

3.  The Thought Suckers (Cogitari Vacuumus)

Your house is infested with these creatures.  Your living room might look like a normal living room

But really, there are about a hundred of these things hanging from the ceiling.  (They’re invisible)

They have giant, blank eyes (about the size of ping pong balls) and “O”-shaped mouths that suck like a vaccuum.

Every day, they wait for someone to enter their lair with intent.

Why was I down here again?

Prevention/Cure:  Stop having worthwhile thoughts.

4.  The Printer Demon  (Terrore Satietus)

This one is about the size of a folded Eggo waffle and it lives inside your printer.

It mostly drinks your printing toner.  (That’s why it runs out so fast.)

But it feeds on your panic.

The printer demon is the reason why the printer never works before your assignment is due.

Prevention/Cure:  Sadly, there’s nothing you can do about this guy.  He comes manufactured with the printer.

5.  The Fire Alarm Fairies  (Fumi Quiritors)

Evil fairies live inside your fire alarms.

They mostly just sit there getting drunk

Until you decide to cook something

Then they go crazy.

Their shrill little voices are the worst.

Of course, it sets off the other Fire Alarm Fairies in your house

And it just escalates until the neighbors call the fire department because they think you’re trying to burn the unit down.

They’re horrible.

Prevention/Cure:  You’ll need to make an offering of an unused, pure white 600 thread count pillowcase.  Shake it at the fire alarm 5,034 times in obeisance.  That’s the only way to appease them.

And, last of all, the worst, most nefarious creature of them all:

6.  The Produce Guy At The Grocery Store  (Frutus Congestus)

Heh heh heh…

There is a special place in not-heaven for that guy.

Share

6 Evil Creatures (That Live in Your House!) was originally published on Story Monster

[gmbh2go-blog]

gmbh mit 34d kaufen Das Marktforschungsinstitut Cogitaris verstärkt die GeschäftsführungAydin Nasseri steigt in die Geschäftsführung auf

}

1 weiterer Medieninhalt Aydin Nasseri steigt in die Geschäftsführung auf. Weiterer Text über ots und http://www.presseportal.de/nr/131662 / Die Verwendung dieses Bildes ist für redaktionelle Zwecke honorarfrei. Veröffentlichung bitte unter Quellenangabe: “obs/COGITARIS GmbH” Bild-Infos Download

Eltville (ots)– Das Marktforschungsinstitut COGITARIS verstärkt seine…

[jobo72]

Gott. Eine Definition

Gott: “worüber hinaus nichts Größeres gedacht werden kann” (aliquid quo nihil maius cogitari possit).

Anselm of Canterbury (Proslogion, Kapitel II: Quod vere sit deus)