#hosting platform

[arushi091]

Best Hosting Provider in Delhi

When it comes to choosing a hosting provider for your website or business, there are many factors to consider. You want a provider that is reliable, fast, and offers excellent customer support. For businesses and individuals based in Delhi, India, selecting a local hosting provider can offer additional benefits like better site performance and localized support.

In this blog, we will explore some of the best hosting providers in Delhi and what makes them stand out in the competitive hosting market.

1. Hostagle – Affordable and Reliable Hosting

Hostagle is quickly becoming one of the top names in the Indian hosting space, especially for small and medium businesses looking for affordable yet reliable hosting. Based in India, Hostagle offers a range of services including shared hosting, VPS hosting, and WordPress hosting, all backed by robust customer support.

Key Features of Hostagle:

Affordable Pricing: One of the key selling points of Hostagle is its affordability. It offers some of the most competitive prices in the market without compromising on quality.

High Performance: Hostagle uses SSD (Solid State Drive) storage for fast data retrieval, ensuring that websites load quickly.

Free Website Migration: Hostagle offers free migration services, making it easy for businesses to switch from their existing host.

24/7 Customer Support: Their customer support team is available around the clock, which is a significant advantage if you run an e-commerce site or have clients in different time zones.

Uptime Guarantee: Hostagle guarantees 99.9% uptime, which means your website will be online and accessible most of the time, providing peace of mind for business owners.

Why Choose Hostagle in Delhi?

Hostagle is ideal for those looking for a cost-effective solution with reliable customer service. Its local presence ensures that their team is well-versed in the needs of Indian businesses. Additionally, Hostagle’s servers are optimized for Indian internet speeds, which means faster load times for users in Delhi and other parts of India.

2. HostGator India

HostGator is a well-known global hosting provider that also has a dedicated infrastructure in India. While HostGator is a global player, its Indian servers ensure fast loading speeds for local users, making it an excellent choice for websites targeting Indian audiences.

Key Features of HostGator India:

Flexible Plans: HostGator India offers a variety of plans, including shared hosting, VPS hosting, and dedicated servers.

Excellent Support: HostGator's 24/7 support is highly rated, with a wide range of support options including live chat, phone, and email support.

Free Website Builder: They offer an easy-to-use website builder for beginners, which helps you get your site up and running quickly.

Money-Back Guarantee: HostGator offers a 45-day money-back guarantee, which allows you to try their services risk-free.

Scalability: HostGator’s hosting plans are highly scalable, meaning you can upgrade as your website grows without much hassle.

Why Choose HostGator India?

If you’re looking for a hosting provider with a well-established reputation, excellent support, and a range of flexible hosting plans, HostGator India is a strong choice. Their servers in India provide good local performance, and their global presence ensures that they have the infrastructure to support businesses targeting international audiences.

3. Bluehost India

Bluehost is another global hosting giant with a strong presence in India. Known for its reliable WordPress hosting services, Bluehost is often recommended by WordPress itself for users looking to host their WordPress websites.

Key Features of Bluehost India:

Optimized for WordPress: Bluehost is one of the best hosting providers for WordPress sites, offering one-click installs, automatic updates, and excellent performance.

Free Domain for the First Year: When you sign up for a hosting plan, Bluehost gives you a free domain name for the first year.

Enhanced Security: Bluehost provides free SSL certificates and regular malware scans, ensuring your website stays secure.

24/7 Customer Support: Their support team is always available through chat, email, or phone to help you with any issues.

30-Day Money-Back Guarantee: Bluehost offers a 30-day money-back guarantee, allowing you to try their services risk-free.

Why Choose Bluehost India?

Bluehost is ideal for businesses that use WordPress or plan to build their site with WordPress. Its easy setup, high performance, and excellent customer service make it a great choice for users in Delhi and beyond.

4. A2 Hosting

A2 Hosting is known for its speed-focused hosting solutions. While not as widely recognized as some of the bigger names, it offers some of the fastest hosting services, thanks to its use of Turbo Servers.

Key Features of A2 Hosting:

Turbo Speed: A2 Hosting's Turbo Servers are designed to deliver faster load times, which can significantly improve the user experience on your site.

Free CDN: A2 Hosting includes a free Content Delivery Network (CDN) in its plans, which can further speed up your website for users around the world.

Developer-Friendly: If you’re a developer, A2 Hosting offers a range of tools like SSH access, staging environments, and other developer-friendly features.

High Uptime: A2 Hosting offers a 99.9% uptime guarantee, ensuring that your website stays up and running.

Why Choose A2 Hosting?

If speed is a top priority for your website, A2 Hosting should be on your radar. Their Turbo Servers deliver exceptional performance, and their global data centers ensure that websites load quickly, no matter where your visitors are located.

5. SiteGround

SiteGround is a globally recognized hosting provider that also has a presence in India. Known for its excellent customer support and high uptime, SiteGround is a solid choice for businesses in Delhi looking for reliable hosting.

Key Features of SiteGround:

Excellent Customer Support: SiteGround is known for its superior customer support, with a team that’s quick to resolve issues.

Free Daily Backups: SiteGround offers free daily backups, so you never have to worry about losing your website’s data.

Optimized Performance: SiteGround’s hosting is optimized for speed, ensuring that websites load quickly even during traffic spikes.

WordPress and WooCommerce Hosting: If you’re running a WordPress or WooCommerce site, SiteGround offers specialized hosting plans designed to enhance performance.

Why Choose SiteGround?

For businesses that need top-tier customer support and fast, reliable hosting, SiteGround is a great option. Its support, performance optimization, and strong reputation make it a favorite among Indian businesses.

Conclusion

Choosing the right hosting provider is crucial for the success of your website. Whether you’re running a small personal blog or a growing business in Delhi, there are several hosting providers to consider. Hostagle offers a great balance of affordability and reliability, especially for Indian businesses. Other international providers like HostGator India, Bluehost India, and A2 Hosting also offer excellent options with tailored solutions for Indian users.

Ultimately, your decision will depend on your specific needs—whether that’s price, performance, customer support, or scalability. Whichever provider you choose, make sure they align with your website goals and offer the services that best suit your business needs.

[techreviewradar232]

Best Web Hosting 2025: comprehensive review

Note : we earn a commission when someone purchase their plan Finding the best web hosting can feel like searching for a unicorn riding a skateboard. Everyone claims to be “the best,” but what does that even mean? It depends on your website’s needs. That’s why we’re ditching the one-size-fits-all approach and diving into three top hosting providers, each shining in its unique way. Ready to find…

[genericpuff]

Tbh at this point you should just make your own webcomic app/website because it would probably be 100 times better than whatever going on with webtoon right now.

hahaha it wouldn't tho, sorry 💀

Here's the fundamental issue with webcomic platforms that a lot of people just don't realize (and why they're so difficult to run successfully):

Storage costs are incredibly expensive, it's why so many sites have limitations on file sizes / page sizes / etc. because all of those images and site info have to be stored somewhere, which costs $$$.

Maintenance costs are expensive and get more so as you grow, you need people who are capable of fixing bugs ASAP and managing the servers and site itself

Financially speaking, webcomics are in a state of high supply, low demand. Loads of artists are willing to create their passion projects, but getting people to read them and pay for them is a whole other issue. Demand is high in the general sense that once people get attached to a webtoon they'll demand more, but many people aren't actually willing to go looking for new stuff to read and depend more on what sites feed them (and what they already like). There are a lot of comics to go around and thus a lot of competition with a limited audience of people willing to actually pay for them.

Trying to build a new platform from the ground up is incredibly difficult and a majority of sites fail within their first year. Not only do you have to convince artists to take a chance on your platform, you have to convince readers to come. Readers won't come if there isn't work on the platform to read, but artists won't come if they don't think the site will be worth it due to low traffic numbers. This is why the artists with large followings who are willing to take chances on the smaller sites are crucial, but that's only if you can convince them to use the site in favor of (or alongside) whatever platform they're using already where the majority of their audience lies. For many creators it's just not worth the time, energy, or risk.

Even if you find short-term success, in the long-term there are always going to be profit margins to maintain. The more users you pull in, the more storage is used by incoming artists, the more you have to spend on storage and server maintenance costs, and that means either taking the risk at crowdfunding (ex. ComicFury) or having to resort to outsider investments (ex. Tapas). Look at SmackJeeves, it used to be a titan in the independent webcomic hosting community, until it folded over to a buyout by NHN and then was pretty much immediately shuttered due to NHN basically turning it into a manwha scanlation site and driving away its entire userbase. And if you don't get bought out and try your hand at crowdfunding, you may just wind up living on a lifeline that could cut out at any moment, like what happened to Inkblazers (fun fact, the death of Inkblazers was what kicked off the cultural shift in Tapas around 2015-16 when all of IB's users migrated over and brought their work with them which was more aimed towards the BL and romancee drama community, rather than the comedy / gag-a-day culture that Tapas had made itself known for... now you deadass can't tell Tapas apart from a lot of scanlation sites because it got bought out by Kakao and kept putting all of its eggs into the isekai/romance drama basket.)

Right now the mindset in which artists and readers are operating is that they're trying way, way too hard to find a "one size fits all" site. Readers want a place where they can find all their favorite webtoons without much effort, artists wants a place where they can post to an audience of thousands, and both sides want a community that will feel tight-knit. But the reality is that you can't really have all three of those things, not on one site. Something always winds up having to be sacrificed - if a site grows big enough, it'll have to start seeking more funding while also cutting costs which will result in features becoming paywall'd, intrusive ads, creators losing their freedom, and/or outsider support which often results in the platform losing its core identity and alienating its tight-knit community.

If I had to describe what I'm talking about in a "pick one" graphic, it would look something like this:

(*note: this is mostly based on my own observations from using all of these sites at some point or another, they're not necessarily entirely accurate to the statistical performance of each site, I can only glean so much from experience and traffic trackers LMAO that said I did ask some comic pals for input and they were very helpful in helping me adjust it with their own takes <3).

The homogenization of the Internet has really whipped people into submission for the "big sites" that offer "everything", but that's never been the Internet, it relies on being multi-faceted and offering different spaces for different purposes. And we're seeing that ideology falter through the enshittification of sites like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. where users are at odds with the platforms because the platforms are gutting features in an attempt to satisfy shareholders whom without the platforms would not exist. Like, most of us aren't paying money to use social media sites / comic platform sites, so where else are they gonna make the necessary funds to keep these sites running? Selling ad space and locking features behind paywalls.

And this is especially true for a lot of budding sites that don't have the audience to support them via crowdfunding but also don't have the leverage to ask for investments - so unless they get really REALLY lucky in EITHER of those departments, they're gonna be operating at a loss, and even once they do achieve either of those things there are gonna be issues in the site's longevity, whether it be dying from lack of growing crowdfunding support or dying from shareholder meddling.

So what can we do?

We can learn how to take our independence back. We don't have to stop using these big platforms altogether as they do have things to offer in their own way, particularly their large audience sizes and dipping into other demographics that might not be reachable from certain sites - but we gotta learn that no single site is going to satisfy every wish we have and we have to be willing to learn the skills necessary to running our own spaces again. Pick up HTML/CSS, get to know other people who know HTML/CSS if you can't grasp it (it's me, I can't grasp it LOL), be willing to take a chance on those "smaller sites" and don't write them off entirely as spaces that can be beneficial to you just because they don't have large numbers or because they don't offer rewards programs. And if you have a really polished piece of work in your hands, look into agencies and publishing houses that specialize in indie comics / graphic novels, don't settle for the first Originals contract that gets sent your way.

For the last decade corporations have been convincing us that our worth is tied to the eyes we can bring to them. Instead of serving ourselves, we've begun serving the big guys, insisting that it has to be worth something eventually and that it'll "payoff" simply by the virtue of gambler's fallacy. Ask yourself what site is right for you and your work rather than asking yourself if your work is good enough for them. Most of us are broke trying to make it work on these sites anyways, may as well be broke and fulfilled by posting in places that actually suit us and our work if we can. Don't define your success by what sites like Webtoons are enforcing - that definition only benefits them, not you.

[imfromsixam]

Quick Guide: Stay Safe While Downloading Sims 4 CC & Mods

I just published a quick guide to help you download Sims 4 CC & mods safely. ⚠️ From trusted sources to spotting red flags. Keep your game clean and secure! 😊

Read it now

[muxhroom-marx-markiplier]

in my head the only reason gundham appears taller than kazuichi is cuz hes got like gigantic platform shoes on and once he takes them off hes stuck at the same eye level as The Creature (kazuichi souda)

nagito and fuyuhiko are also there. these four are besties if you dont believe me look at their official art !!!!!!!! they r literally best friends

[sazzabella]

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Someday, we’ll all take comfort in the internet’s “dark corners”

I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me on SUNDAY (Mar 24) with LAURA POITRAS in NYC, then Anaheim, and beyond!

Platforms decay. Tech bosses, unconstrained by competition; regulation; ad blockers and other adversarial interoperability; and their own workers, will inevitably hollow out their platforms, using ultraflexible digital technology to siphon value away from end users and business customers, leaving behind the bare minimum of value to keep all those users locked in:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/30/go-nuts-meine-kerle/#ich-bin-ein-bratapfel

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/23/evacuate-the-platforms/#let-the-platforms-burn

Enshittification is the inevitable result of high switching costs. Tech bosses are keenly attuned to opportunities to lock in their customers and users, because the harder is to leave a platform, the worse the platform can treat you – the more value it can rob you of – without risking your departure.

But platform users are a heterogeneous, lumpy mass. Different groups of users have different switching costs. An adult Facebook user of long tenure has more reasons to stay than a younger user: they have more complex social lives, with nonoverlapping social circles from high school, college, various jobs, affinity groups, and family. They are more likely to have a chronic illness, or to be caring for someone with chronic illness, and to be a member of a social media support group they value highly. They are more likely to be connected to practical communities, like little league carpool rotas.

That's the terrible irony of platform decay: the more value you get from a platform, the more cost that platform can extract, a cost denominated in your wellbeing, enjoyment and dignity.

(At this point, someone will pipe up and say, "If you're not paying for the product, you're the product." It's nonsense. Dignity, respect and fairness aren't frequent flier program perks that tech companies dribble out to their best customers. Companies will happily treat their paying customers as "products" if they think those customers can't avoid other forms of rent-extraction, such as "attention rents")

https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/06/attention-rents/#consumer-welfare-queens

Now, consider the converse proposition: for younger users, platforms deliver less value. Younger users have less complex social lives on average relative to their parents and grandparents, which means that platforms have fewer ways to sink their hooks into those young users. Further: young users tend to want things that the platforms don't want them to have, right from the first day they sign up. In particular, young users often want to conduct their socializing out of eyesight and earshot of adults, especially parents, teachers, and other authority figures. This means that a typical younger user has both more reasons to leave a platform as well as fewer reasons to stay there.

Younger people have an additional reason to bail on platforms early and often: if your online and offline social circles strongly overlap – if you see the same people at school as you do in your feed, it's much easier to reassemble your (smaller, less complex) social circle on a new platform.

And so: on average, young people like platforms less, hate them more, and have both less to lose and more to gain by leaving one platform for another. Sure, some young people are also burning with youth's neophilia. But even without that neophilia, young people are among the first to go when tech bosses start to ratchet up the enshittification.

Beyond young people, there are others who tend to jump ship early, like sex-workers:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/21/early-adopters/#sex-tech

Sex-workers' technology changes are only incidentally the result of some novelty-seeking impulse. The real reason to change platforms if you're a sex-worker is that the platforms are either absolutely hostile to sex-workers, or profoundly indifferent to the suffering their policy changes rain down upon them.

The same is broadly true of other disfavored groups, including those with out-of-mainstream political ideologies. Some of these groups hold progressive views, others are out-and-out Nazis, but all of them chafe at the platforms' policies at the best of times, and are far more ready to jump ship when the platforms tighten the noose on all their users.

This is where "dark corners" come in. The worst people on the internet have relocated to its so-called dark corners – privately hosted servers, groupchats, message-boards, etc. Some of these are notorious: Kiwi Farms, 4chan, 8kun, sprawling Telegram groupchats. Others only breach when they are implicated in waves of unthinkably cruel and grotesque crimes:

https://www.wired.com/story/764-com-child-predator-network/

The answer to crimes committed in the internet's dark corners is the same as for crimes committed anywhere: catch the criminals, prosecute the crimes. But a distressing number of well-meaning people observe the nexus between dark corners and the crimes that fester there, and conclude that the problem is with the dark corners, themselves.

These people observe that social media platforms like Facebook, and intermediaries like Cloudflare, DNS providers, and domain registrars constitute a "nexus of control" – chokepoints that trap the online lives of billions of people – and conclude that these gigantic corporations can and should be made "responsible" for their users:

https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/

From there, it's a short leap to conclude that anyone who isn't in a position to be controlled by these too big to jail, too big to fail, relentlessly enshittifying corporations must be pushed into their demesne.

This is a deal with the devil. In the name of preventing small groups of terrible people from gathering in private, beyond the control of the world's insufferable and cruel tech barons, we risk dooming everyone else to being permanently within those unworthy billionaires' thumbs.

This is why people like Mark Zuckerberg are so eager to see an increase in "intermediary liability" rules like Section 230. Zuckerberg's greatest fear isn't having to spend more on moderators or algorithms that suppress controversial subjects:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/instagram-users-outraged-by-app-limiting-political-content-ahead-of-elections/

The thing he fears the most is losing control over his users. That's why he bought Instagram: to recapture the young users who were fleeing his mismanaged, enshittified platform in droves:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/03/big-tech-cant-stop-telling-on-itself/

A legal mandate for Zuckerberg to police his users is a legal requirement that he surveil and control those users. It's fundamentally incompatible with the new drive in competition circles to force Zuckerberg and his fellow tech barons to offer gateways that make it easier to escape their grasp, by allowing users to depart Facebook and continue to socialize with the users who stay behind:

https://www.eff.org/interoperablefacebook

Remember: the more locked-in a platform user is, the harder that platform will squeeze that user, safe in the knowledge that the cost of leaving is higher than the cost of staying and tolerating the platform's abuse.

This is the problem with "feudal security" – the warlord who lures you into his castle fortress with the promise of protection from external threats is, in reality, operating a prison where no one can protect you from him:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/08/leona-helmsley-was-a-pioneer/#manorialism

Rather than fighting to abolish dark corners because only the worst people on the internet use them today, we should be normalizing dark corners, making it easier for every kind of user to find a cozy nook that is shaded from the baleful glare of Zuck and his fellow, eminently guillotineable tech warlords:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/15/normalize-dark-corners/

Enshittification is relentless. The collapse of the restraints that penalized tech companies who abused their users – competition, regulation, interoperability and their own workers' consciences – has inculcated every tech boss with an incurable enshittification imperative.

Efforts to make the platforms safer for their users can only take us so far. Fundamentally, these vast, centralized systems that vest authority with flawed and mediocre and frail human dictators (who fancy themselves noble, brilliant and infallible) will never be safe for human habitation. Rather than focusing on improving the platforms, we should be evacuating them:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/09/let-the-platforms-burn/

Online communities that control their own moderation policies won't always get it right. But there is a whole host of difficult moderation calls that can never be adequately handled by outsiders overseeing vast, sprawling platforms. Distinguishing friendly banter from harassment requires the context that only an insider can hope to possess.

We all deserve dark corners where we stand a chance of finding well-managed communities that can deliver the value that keeps us stuck to our decaying giant platforms. Eventually, the enshittification will chase every user off these platforms – not just kids or sex-workers or political radicals. When that happens, it sure would be nice if everyone could set up in a dark corner of their own.

Name your price for 18 of my DRM-free ebooks and support the Electronic Frontier Foundation with the Humble Cory Doctorow Bundle.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/23/evacuate-the-platforms/#let-the-platforms-burn

[abba-snail]

If I had a nickel for every baseball-themed NPC named Parker in an online piece of media that canonically makes bad voting choices and can ostensibly be called a "poor little meow meow" I'd have two nickels. (Jan 2024)

[blubbed]

HELLO my friend and i are hosting a jane schoenbrun movie marathon! featuring: i saw the tv glow, we're all going to the world's fair, and a self-induced hallucination (!!!)

if you can see this, you're invited! ok to rb for mutuals<3

[transient-winds]

Me when they announced the play back in September: oh, hmm. Interesting.

Me after watching the stage play:

GUYS IM OBSESSED WITH THE CAST & CREW. MY ABSOLUTE FAVORITES BEING SANAMIYA (Sana Hiroki - Umemiya Hajime), SATONAKA (Satonaka - Togame Jo), IMAJI (Imamaki Hikaru - Tomiyama Choji) AND ISHIKAWA (Ishikawa Ryota - Sakura Haruka) OMG THEIR VOCALS?!?! THE URGE TO REDRAW THEIR INTERACTIONS ON THEIR TWITTER IS SO REALL.

THE CHOREOGRAPHY, THE SILLY JOKE ADDITIONS, THE STAGE INTERACTIONS!!!

THE SINGING?? THE SOUNDTRACKS?!?!? i fear i'll be replaying this for the next couple of days. ITS SO GOOD 😭.

—

If you'd like to avail tickets for viewing the stage play + extras (cast talking about the play & their experiences), you can check their availability on ABEMA PPV and/or Theater Complex Town! There's a general ticket (viewing until Jan 26th) and 22-week archive (viewing until Feb 2nd).

[rolansrighthorn]

Legitimately fucking annoyed over Discord's "age gating" rule lmao

[mfcl3780cdw]

anyone want to infodump abt what the fediverse is, how you use it, etc? i think my eyes are bleeding, reading all these articles

[aroaessidhe]

2024 reads / storygraph

Outdrawn

f/f contemporary romance

two cartoonist who’ve been rivals since uni, and now have competing webcomics online, have to work together on the relaunch of a cult classic at the comic press they both work at

they both struggle with art-related physical and mental health issues, and complicated families

[synchodai]

Controversial take incoming but posts comparing AO3 to parties or potlucks are so... objectively wrong. If you want a space that guarantees "fandom building" (which is not even what most of these posts want; they want comments on their fic which is *not* two people mutually geeking out over the source text, it's one person engaging specifically with THEIR text), there are forums, online writing groups, and social media spaces like tumblr and reddit which have long threads on metas and discussions.

AO3 isn't a potluck — it's a library. You can't insist AO3 isn't social media and say in the same breath that readers are morally obligated to socially interact or else risk being "fandom freeloaders." People who only check out books from a library and not participate in anything else are not "discouraging authors from donating books to the library."

[mesevents]

So, we just have a few late drawings coming in at later dates before i can call the event truly done. But!

Show's not over just yet folks. I'll need your help deciding on the fate of these events because (and there's a chance you had to experience the tumblr mishaps yourself) tumblr isn't a great site for consistently messaging people.

I intend to put up a poll asking if people would prefer a discord server where people can't talk and for it to be solely used by me to post reminders, announcements, and easily dm everyone without adding 30+ people to my friends list each time.

the other option would be to let people talk in the discord like a normal one. ? idk if there'd be true talking tho if it'd even be Worth It... In the case it's a normal server though, i'd still make it opt-in to getting into the 'normal' part of it all.

Saying all this to ask, if anyone has any other ideas, feel free to suggest them?

If there's nothin', I'll post the poll up on Sunday (Feb 16) and have it run for a week.