#wenclair is endgame

[wenclair-more-like-whenclair]

I think it’s worth interpreting Enid Sinclair as a queer-coded character. At first, I thought that the whole “wolfing out” thing was just meant to parallel the coming out experience so that we would have a fair comparison of what Enid is going through. But really, it could actually be a metaphor for Enid’s queerness. It wouldn’t be that big of a stretch for a character whose color palette looks at sometimes lesbian and bisexual at others. Not to mention that her strongest relationship in the show is with Wednesday, a girl.

Just saying: we’re talking about a queer color-palatted female character whose closest relationship is with another girl and who has an entire hidden arc about feeling the need to conform to her family’s expectations of her—an arc that is intentionally compared to queerness and the coming out experience. And now, at this pre s2 standstill where we supposedly “aren’t getting any romance” but the showrunners promised to focus on Enid and Wednesday’s relationship, would it be such a stretch to suggest that they intentionally queer coded Enid and are planning on the two of them being endgame, using s2 as a means to develop their relationship ship and transition it into something romantic? I think Wenclair endgame is likelier than we think.

[mitytheclown]

"OMG are you really shipping them???" YES I AM and I will continue

[thatwomanlovingpotatofromtwitter]

Wuh luh wuh

[silver-soul00]

You don't like Wenclair? Absolutely OK, that's all very well, but to call it forced is just a big mistake and I will explain why (the artist of the fan art on Percy and Annabeth is Sethkiel, Tumblr, Twitter and Instagram) + Percy Jackson spoilers about his romantic relationship in the books

Enid is in effect an ideal choice as a partner for Wednesday Addams not only because of their obvious character complementarity, but also because of the positive impact a relationship based on their dynamic could have on both personalities.

Various psychological and social studies support the idea that interpersonal relationships based on complementarity and mutual acceptance are more likely to be healthy and long-lasting. Wednesday, with her introverted, cynical and distant character, is balanced by Enid, who stands out for her emotional openness, empathy and desire to connect with others.

This polarity creates a synergy that not only enriches their friendship but could serve as the basis for a meaningful romantic relationship.

One of the key components is the unconditional support Enid offers Wednesday. According to research on the psychology of relationships, emotional support is one of the strongest indicators of relationship satisfaction.

Enid, despite the difficulties Wednesday poses to her, constantly stands by her side, demonstrating a patience and understanding that goes beyond mere friendship.

This type of dynamic is consistent with the findings of Feeney and Collins (2015), who highlight how relationships characterised by a partner who serves as a ‘secure base’ improve resilience and psychological well-being for both parties. For Wednesday, who often shows difficulties in trusting others and expressing her emotions, having a figure like Enid beside her could help her explore deeper aspects of her emotional identity.

Moreover, Enid represents a form of positivity and optimism that counterbalances Wednesday's cynicism. This counterbalance, far from being a hindrance, proves beneficial. Studies conducted by Gable et al. (2006) suggest that relationships in which one partner promotes positive emotions and encourages the other to experience joy and pleasure have a positive impact not only on individual well-being, but also on couple cohesion. Enid's ability to celebrate life's simple moments and accept Wednesday as it is can offer her a safe space in which to lower her defences without feeling judged.

The chance of a queer relationship between Wednesday Addams and Enid Sinclair is not only coherent with the long history of the Addams Family, but also represents a natural evolution of Wednesday's character.

The Addams Family, since its creation, has been a symbol of rebellion against social norms and celebration of difference.

Charles Addams conceived the family as a parody of traditional American families, overturning their conventional values.

While middle-class American families aspired to normality, the Addams family found pride and beauty in their eccentricity. This attitude made the family an icon for anyone who felt marginalized or different, including queer communities. Their gothic aesthetic, black humour and unqualified acceptance of all forms of strangeness made them symbols of inclusivity, even if this theme was rarely made explicit directly.

Wednesday Addams, in particular, embodies this challenge to social projections. From her earliest appearances, she has been portrayed as an intelligent, sarcastic and deeply independent outsider who rejects imposed social norms. In the films of the 1990s, this nature is clearly expressed: Wednesday, despite being young, is perfectly aware of her identity and interests, refusing any attempt to force her to conform.

An emblematic example is her relationship with Joel Glicker in The Addams Family 2.

Joel, an insecure and nerdy boy, becomes an ally and romantic interest, but the relationship is clearly devoid of the traditional dynamics of teenage romance.

Wednesday shows interest, but expresses it in his own way, with humour and detachment. This episode shows that Wednesday is not ‘immune’ to romance, but lives it according to her own rules.

In the Netflix series Wednesday, the dynamic with Enid Sinclair adds an even greater level of complexity. Enid, with her sunny disposition and expansive nature, is the perfect counterbalance to Wednesday's coldness.

Their relationship is built on a foundation of trust, emotional intimacy and mutual support that far surpasses any other connection Wednesday develops in the series, including those with her male romantic interests, Tyler and Xavier. Psychological studies, such as that of Aron et al. (1997) on interpersonal intimacy, show that the strongest relationships are often based on complementary differences. Wednesday and Enid embody this complementarity: the dark and the light, the rational and the emotional, detachment and empathy.

This kind of dynamic is often the basis of the most memorable romantic relationships in fiction, and it would be only natural for their bond to evolve into something more.

The criticism that a queer relationship between Wednesday and Enid would be a ‘stretch’ often masks prejudices about queer inclusivity. Interestingly, audiences unreservedly accept heterosexual romance in contexts that do not always align perfectly with the characters' personalities.

For instance, in the 1990s films, no one criticised the fact that Wednesday, a deeply cynical and aloof girl, had a romantic moment with Joel. Similarly, in the Netflix series, her interactions with Tyler and Xavier are accepted without particular objection, despite the fact that Wednesday shows very little genuine interest in either of them.

This demonstrates a double standard: heterosexual romance is perceived as ‘natural’ and acceptable, while queer romance must be justified or considered as extraordinary.

Queer representation in the media, as studies by GLAAD (2022) show, is crucial in normalising these relationships and offering positive role models for those who identify outside traditional norms. The relationship between Wednesday and Enid would not only be consistent with the characters, but also an important step towards greater inclusivity. Furthermore, the argument that Wednesday ‘is not made for romance’ is easily disproved by her narrative history. She has never been a traditionally romantic character, but that does not mean she cannot develop genuine and deep connections.

Her emotional openness towards Enid in the series is a clear sign of personal growth and openness towards meaningful relationships.

Finally, it is important to point out that many of the most famous romantic relationships in fiction were born out of deep friendships. From Harry Potter (Ron and Hermione) to Friends (Ross and Rachel), the transition from friendship to romance is a widely accepted narrative trope, especially when it involves heterosexual couples. It is hypocritical to consider it a stretch only in the case of queer relationships. In the case of Wednesday and Enid, their emotional intimacy and mutual support lay a solid foundation for a romantic relationship that would not only be consistent with the Addams Family's history, but would also represent a natural evolution of Wednesday's character, keeping her rebellious and non-conformist essence intact.

Let's take a concrete example to show that the basis of the Wenclair ship is valid?

Percy Jackson.

The relationship between Percy Jackson and Annabeth Chase is built in a gradual way and represents a story arc that starts with friendship and grows into romance, making it a perfect example to show that it is not ‘forced’ when a close bond turns into love.

The saga of Percy Jackson and the Gods of Olympus offers an excellent example of how a friendship can develop naturally into a romantic relationship. The dynamic between Percy Jackson and Annabeth Chase develops gradually, reflecting a relationship-building model that emphasises mutual growth, respect and trust. Initially, Percy and Annabeth meet in the context of Camp Half-Blood, where significant differences in their characters emerge. Annabeth, rational and strategic, tends to see Percy as an unprepared novice, while Percy perceives Annabeth as distant and authoritarian. Nevertheless, their shared adventures lead to a mutual respect that becomes the basis for a solid friendship.

In later books, such as The Sea of Monsters and The Titan's Curse, their relationship deepens through moments of vulnerability and emotional connection. Annabeth shares with Percy her ambitions and fears, such as the dream of building something lasting or the burden of her loyalty to the gods. Percy, for his part, shows a growing sense of protection towards Annabeth, being willing to risk his life to save her on several occasions. These episodes mark a gradual evolution of their relationship, but without ever abandoning the friendly core that sustains it.

The turning point occurs in the fourth book of the saga, The Battle of the Labyrinth, when Percy begins to acknowledge his romantic feelings for Annabeth. However, the transition does not happen abruptly; both characters, being still teenagers, navigate uncertainly between friendship and love, making their relational development realistic and free of narrative forcing. In later books, such as The Final Clash and especially in the Heroes of Olympus series, Percy and Annabeth consolidate their romantic relationship without ever losing the bond of friendship that characterises them. This balance is particularly evident in The House of Hades, where their mutual support, even in extreme situations, underlines the depth of their bond.

The transition between friendship and love in the case of Percy and Annabeth is an example of a well-constructed narrative, reflecting real dynamics also highlighted by psychological studies. According to Kaplan and Keys (1997), many successful romantic relationships develop from pre-existing friendships due to the presence of trust and emotional intimacy as solid foundations. Moreover, this dynamic is widely accepted by the public, as it reflects common human experiences. The story of Percy and Annabeth demonstrates that the transition from friendship to romance can be organic and believable, especially when constructed with attention to the emotional aspects of the characters.

Applying this perspective to the case of Wednesday and Enid, it becomes clear that such a transition would not be ‘forced’, as is often claimed by some critics. The two girls share a relationship that is based on complementarity and mutual growth: Wednesday is cynical and reserved, while Enid is expansive and empathetic, and together they create a balance similar to that between Percy and Annabeth.

To ignore this possibility is to operate a double standard, considering acceptable for heterosexual couples a dynamic that is labelled as unnatural or artificial in the case of a queer couple. The representation of Wednesday and Enid in a romantic relationship would not only be consistent with traditional narrative dynamics, but could also contribute to greater inclusivity and a richer, more nuanced representation of relationships in pop culture.

[foxedfriend]

Your honour, what the “witness” fails to mention about the “attack” is that I only beat up the writer after they wrote a beautiful story of a queer character falling in love with their best friend over the better part of a decade, hint subtextually at it being requited, had the interviews and promotions of the media play into it and profit from queer viewers feelings… only to end it tragically and/or follow it up by writing the queer character a one dimensional love interest within the last few episodes, put nothing into the relationship, and have them be the endgame instead. Did I mention they yanked the fans around for YEARS?? Literally years. Almost a decade. Yeah. So. I plead self defence.

[randomizersworld]

Wednesday: Enid, I need you to help me hide this body.

Enid: Aaaannnnd...

Wednesday: ...

Enid: ...

Wednesday: ...please

Enid: now it wasn't that hard was it?

Wednesday: yes, yes it was

[delicatetigerobject]

WENCLAIR AND BYLER!!! WENCLAIR AND BYLER!!!!!!!!

WENCLAIR AND BYLER OMG i unfortunately am getting back into Wednesday and wenclair came with it and OOF it hit me right in the chest with a laundry basket full of bricks.

🕯🕯🕯manifesting wenclair and byler this year 🕯🕯🕯

🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯wenclair and byler endgame 2025 🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯

drawing wenclair right now while watching wednesday and thinking about byler rain kiss ohhh it hurts

[sunnylittlebisexual]

Byler and Wenclair will save 2025 for me

[prefer-to-be-vilified]

Wenclair this, Wyler that… I want Aunt Debbie to still be alive. I want her to be actively hunting Uncle Fester to this day. I want her to show up to Nevermore and kidnap Wednesday for information only to end up spending the entire episode helping her niece with next season’s mystery.

Dream casting would be Elizabeth Olsen because:

Obviously. The GOAT of playing unhinged, morally reprehensible women who always end up being everyones favourite. But I’m flexible.

[homosexualretard]

my multo isn’t an ex—but a ship that was quoted “queerbaiting” knowing that we won’t really get what we really wanted for the two of them—love confessions and or just one long and lingering kisses that they’ll share before realising this is all wrong and things would get awkward between them two.

if they’re really not endgame. count your days tim burton.

[lordyssac]

This tiktok talked about why cishets get mad about fans thinking some characters might be lgbtq+. It was very well explained, go see it.

But it wasn’t about Stranger Things. I think they were implying Wednesday (Wenclair). But look at the search! 🤭

[somenerdfromwhatever]

Since Wednesday hype is coming back, I started to cosplay as Wednesday Addams and Enid Sinclair again! Though I love to cosplay as Enid a lot! She’s my comfort character! I’m trying to make Wenclair TikTok’s in both cosplays though!!

I want to see if I can do the Season 2 wig for Enid though��

[regina-massive-deal-george]

this is a PACKAGED SET do not SEPARATE

(yeah we lookin at each other from the very opposite sides of this room we decorated in the school building. yeah she looks super pretty while i look unhinged but that’s a common theme here ig. love you jan)

[vaudevillian-vix]

i need a fanart of tamber dressing up as wenclair for halloween. tara as wednesday (ofc) and amber is enid. imagine amber in colorful clothes and blonde hair with pink and blue streaks, what a sight it would be lmao. but she would fr ate and slayed that blonde hair look

[silver-soul00]

I make a pseudo sequel to my previous post, responding to accusations directed towards the ship.

Always in a constructive manner.

[There are accusations that the Wednesday x Enid couple is ‘’toxic‘’.]

A frequent criticism concerns the character differences between Wednesday and Enid, with the argument that their differences could lead to a dysfunctional relationship.

However, research has demonstrated that differences are not necessarily detrimental to a relationship.

According to Markman et al. (2010), couples who are mutually supportive through differences tend to develop greater conflict resolution skills and strengthen their bond.

In the case of Wednesday and Enid, their differences do not create insurmountable distances, but rather offer opportunities for personal and collective growth.

Enid helps Wednesday explore emotions that she normally tends to repress, while Wednesday offers Enid a more rational and centred perspective.

Another accusation concerns the possibility of emotional dependency, where one party is overly dependent on the other.

Nevertheless, their relationship shows signs of healthy reciprocity.

In accordance with Kelley and Thibaut's (1978) model of interdependence, healthy relationships are characterised by a balance of power and mutual support.

Enid and Wednesday demonstrate this interdependence on several occasions: Enid supports Wednesday emotionally during difficult times, while Wednesday protects Enid physically and respects her as an equal. This mutuality is crucial to avoid toxic dynamics.

A lot of criticism of queer relationships derives from stereotypes and prejudices that do not apply to heterosexual relationships.

Queer literature, as examined by Adrienne Rich in the concept of ‘compulsory heterosexuality,’ suggests that queer relationships are often misinterpreted through the prism of heterosexual standards.

Queer relationships, like the potential one between Wednesday and Enid, do not have to conform to these standards to be considered valid and healthy.

Their interactions challenge traditional conventions, but this does not make them toxic; on the contrary, they provide a far more inclusive and diverse representation of relationships.

A core feature of healthy relationships is mutual support for personal growth, as pointed out by Deci and Ryan (2000) in their theory of self-determination.

Enid also encourages Wednesday to explore sides of herself that she would normally reject, helping her to emotionally grow. Wednesday, with her pragmatic approach, helps Enid to become more autonomous and assertive.

This mutually supportive dynamic contrasts sharply with toxic dynamics, where one side tries to belittle or hinder the other.

Stating that Wednesday could be toxic for Enid requires an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of their relationship, based on psychological patterns of healthy and toxic relationships.

Wednesday, while reserved and distant, does not show manipulative intentions toward Enid.

Available from Braiker and Kelley (1979), manipulation in relationships is characterized by intentional behaviors to gain power and control over the other. Wednesday, on the other hand, behaves in a straightforward and honest manner, although she can be brusque at times.

She never uses Enid for personal gain or to exert power, which eliminates a key aspect of toxic relationships.

Throughout the series, Wednesday shows that she is capable of emotional growth and learning from her mistakes, especially in her interactions with Enid.

Canary and Stafford (1992) point out that the ability to resolve conflict and grow together is an indicator of a healthy relationship. Wednesday, initially reluctant to express emotions, learns to recognize the importance of human connections through Enid's influence.

This suggests an ability to adapt and improve, not typical of toxic relationships, where harmful behavior is repetitive and static.

But despite their personality differences, Wednesday and Enid show a strong mutual respect for each other.

Wednesday, while often cold, does not ignore Enid's emotional needs and, on several occasions, tries to support her, albeit in her own way.

Bowlby's (1969) attachment theory highlights the importance of mutual emotional support as the foundation of healthy relationships.

Wednesday offers support to Enid when necessary, showing that he respects her needs and boundaries.

A crucial aspect of a toxic relationship is isolation, where one partner tries to separate the other from his or her support networks (Walker, 1979).

Wednesday, on the other hand, not only does not isolate Enid, but encourages her independence.

Wednesday respects Enid's need for other friendships and supports, demonstrating a healthy, non-possessive approach to the relationship.

We should not forget about the communication between Wednesday and Enid, which although sometimes difficult, is direct and honest.

According to Gottman (1999), open and honest communication is essential to the health of a relationship.

Even in times of conflict, Wednesday does not hide her thoughts or intentions, which helps a clearer and more respectful dynamic, avoiding the traps of manipulation or emotional control.

Some may object, even rightly, that Wednesday “used” Enid during the outing to the Gates mansion.

Indeed, there is an episode in which Wednesday involves Enid in her plans to explore the Gates mansion, an example of behavior that might appear to be exploitation or deception.

However, it is important to analyze the context and motivation behind the action to assess whether this represents a pattern of toxic behavior.

Wednesday does not exploit Enid in an ongoing or manipulative way;

Enid's involvement in this situation is more of an isolated incident related to Wednesday's determination to solve the mystery.

The key difference from toxic relationships is that Wednesday's intent is not to control or manipulate Enid in the long run, but rather to get help with a specific mission.

Toxic relationships are often characterized by repeated and systematic manipulative behaviors (Braiker and Kelley, 1979).

In Wednesday's case, the episode with the Gates mansion is an exception rather than a rule.

There is no evidence that Wednesday continues to exploit Enid on a regular basis or for selfish personal purposes.

And no, the exchange of places during the work at Pilgrim Word doesn't count at all, that's because that was an exchange that favors both clearly and without deception, Enid wanted to go together with Ajax and Wednesday wanted to please her favoring even herself.

An important element is Wednesday's ability to reflect on her mistakes and try to improve her actions.

After the mansion episode, Wednesday shows greater consideration for Enid's feelings and boundaries, a sign of personal growth.

In accordance with Gottman's (1999) research, the ability to recognize and correct one's mistakes is fundamental to a healthy relationship.

After the conflict caused by the visit to the mansion, Enid and Wednesday manage to discuss and resolve their differences. This indicates a relationship based on open communication and mutual respect, which contrasts with toxic relationships where conflicts tend to remain unresolved or lead to ongoing manipulation.

Well, now here's where I'm going to be much more direct, before you read this part I invite you to look up my analysis of why Tyler is a toxic partner (and especially because he doesn't really love Wednesday) in my Tumbrl account, because now that I'm going to make comparisons I'm going to use some cues from that post.

Tyler maintains deceptive and manipulative behavior for much of the series.

He hides his true identity and intentions, exploiting Wednesday's trust to get closer to her while serving his personal purposes as the Hyde monster.

This type of behavior is a classic example of emotional manipulation, where one partner uses the other's trust and emotions to gain personal advantage or control the situation, as described by Braiker and Kelley (1979).

He constantly uses deception and manipulation to maintain control of the situation.

This pattern is typical of toxic relationships, where manipulative behavior is continuous and an integral part of the relational dynamic (Walker, 1979).

In comparison, Wednesday's behavior toward Enid, even when it might seem abrupt or instrumental, is not characterized by persistent manipulative intentionality.

Wednesday involves Enid in a specific episode (the Gates mansion), but he does not try to systematically deceive or manipulate her for his own personal gain.

Always remembering that Wednesday's behavior, while insensitive at times, does not follow a consistent manipulative pattern.

His relationship with Enid is characterized by honest communication and mutual growth, not systematic manipulation.

Tyler shows no intention to change or be honest with Wednesday until he is discovered.

His lack of change and self-reflection is indicative of a toxic relationship, where manipulative behavior persists without improvement.

And here many might bring forward another objection.

That is, the fact that Tyler is not fully conscious; he is being manipulated by an outside person.

And that is true, but let me expound on that in a better way

There is a contradiction in saying that Tyler deceived Wednesday because he was under Laurel's control, but at the same time claiming that he really loved her.

If Tyler is completely under Laurel's control, then his manipulative actions toward Wednesday could be attributed to a loss of autonomy.

However, this would imply that he is not in control of his actions and therefore cannot truly love authentically, since love requires intentionality and will.

Authentic love involves conscious choice and genuine connection based on mutual respect, trust and understanding (Sternberg, 1986).

If Tyler is under Laurel's control, then he is unable to offer this kind of love, making any claim of authentic love inconsistent with his manipulative state.

Despite Laurel's control, Tyler maintains deceptive behavior for much of the series, hiding his true identity and intentions.

This behavior stands in stark contrast to genuine love, which requires transparency and sincerity.

Claiming that Tyler loves Wednesday while continually deceiving her creates a contradiction: deception is a sign of manipulation and disrespect, while genuine love requires honesty and respect.

According to Bowlby's (1969) attachment theory, a healthy relationship is based on mutual trust, which is clearly violated by Tyler.

Although Tyler is under Laurel's control, there is a question of personal responsibility.

If Tyler really loved Wednesday, one would expect him to find a way to resist or to warn her of danger, showing genuine concern for her welfare.

Tyler's lack of resistance suggests complicity, which contradicts the idea of genuine love.

In a healthy relationship, the partner should do everything possible to protect the other from harm, not to contribute to their deception and manipulation.

We therefore conclude this post with a comparison encapsulating all the info we have gathered in the series.

The relationship between Wednesday and Tyler initially develops on a false premise, where Tyler presents himself as an ally and confidant, only to turn out to be a threat.

This behavior reflects what psychologists call “emotional manipulation.”

A study by Christensen et al. (2006) of couples with abusive dynamics found that manipulators often use deception to create a sense of dependence and vulnerability in their partners.

Tyler uses his appearance as a reliable boyfriend to gain Wednesday's trust, only to betray her later, a clear sign of emotional abuse and deception.

Toxic relationships are often characterized by one partner trying to isolate the other from his or her support networks.

Although Tyler does not isolate Wednesday in the traditional sense, her emotional duplicity alienates her from her sources of trust and safety.

Studies such as Walker's (1979) work on battered women show how the sense of emotional isolation and confusion created by manipulative partners leads to deeply dysfunctional relationships.

Wednesday, in her search for answers, finds herself dependent on Tyler, only to be betrayed.

Tyler does not provide true support to Wednesday, but rather exploits her vulnerabilities for his own purposes.

According to Gottman and Silver (1999), one of the strongest predictors of relational success is the presence of mutual emotional support.

In the relationship with Tyler, this element is entirely absent, as his support is conditional and aimed at manipulation.

In sharp contrast, the relationship between Wednesday and Enid shows mutual support that encourages personal growth.

Following Deci and Ryan's (2000) self-determination theory, relationships that promote personal growth and autonomy lead to greater well-being and satisfaction.

Enid helps Wednesday explore aspects of herself that she usually represses, such as the ability to connect emotionally with others.

At the same time, Wednesday offers Enid a more rational and pragmatic perspective, helping her to become more confident.

Enid and Wednesday's ability to deal with and resolve conflict is a hallmark of a healthy relationship.

Without question, according to Canary and Stafford (1992), open communication and the ability to handle conflict are critical to maintaining a positive relationship.

Even when the two disagree, as shown on several occasions in the series, they manage to find a balance and respect each other's boundaries.

This mutual respect is fundamental to a balanced relationship.

The relationship between Wednesday and Enid is distinguished by the strong mutual support that fosters the development of both of their identities. Bowlby (1969) in his attachment theory stresses the importance of having a partner who provides emotional security, allowing the other to explore and develop their identity.

Enid provides Wednesday with a “safe harbor,” helping her navigate her complex emotions, while Wednesday provides Enid with rational support that encourages her to explore and accept her unique identity.

Studies such as Bancroft's (2002) on emotional abuse and coercive control show that toxic relationships are often characterized by a cycle of manipulation, isolation, and lack of mutual support, elements that are clearly found in the dynamic between Wednesday and Tyler.

In contrast, healthy relationships such as the one between Wednesday and Enid are based on reciprocity, open communication, and emotional support, elements that research indicates are fundamental to relational well-being.

The portrayal of positive queer relationships, such as the potential one between Wednesday and Enid, is supported by research that points to the importance of inclusive role models for the well-being of LGBTQ+ people.

A report by Meyer (2003) on minority stress theory shows that having positive models of queer relationships can reduce feelings of isolation and increase feelings of belonging and acceptance.

Thank you for reading this far and I wish you a good day✨✨✨

[therulerofallpotatos]

Chapters: 1/1 Fandom: Wednesday (TV 2022) Rating: Teen And Up Audiences Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply Relationships: Wednesday Addams/Tyler Galpin, Wednesday Addams/Enid Sinclair, Tyler Galpin/Enid Sinclair, Tyler Galpin & Enid Sinclair, Wednesday Addams/Tyler Galpin/Enid Sinclair, Wednesday Addams & Enid Sinclair Characters: Wednesday Addams, Tyler Galpin, Enid Sinclair, Bianca Barclay, Xavier Thorpe Additional Tags: Pre-Slash, Alternate Universe - Canon Divergence, Tyler Galpin Needs a Hug, Enid Sinclair is Soft for Wednesday Addams, Enid Sinclair is soft for Tyler Galpin, Wednesday Addams is Whipped, Wednesday Addams is Soft for Enid Sinclair, Wednesday Addams is Bad at Feelings, Friends to Lovers, Tyler is a Sinclair, Tyler Galpin Attends Nevermore Academy, No Marilyn Thornhill | Laurel Gates, The Rave'N, Writer Wednesday Addams, Protectiveness, Possessive Behavior, Obsessive Behavior, Mutual Pining, Mutual Stalking, Stalking, High School, Nevermore Academy (Wednesday), canon-typical bigotry, Pack Dynamics, Pseudo-Incest, pre-incest, they aren't even thinking about it yet, Rumors, Enid holds the faith in humanity in the group and she's exasperated as hell over it Series: Part 2 of Tyler Galpin of the Sinclair Pack Summary:

Tyler learned very early on that people hated him. Whether they were werewolves or normies, he was the thing people told their kids about to make them behave. He wasn’t a person, and he certainly wasn’t capable of anything other than violence. He learned very early on that Enid didn’t. Enid loved him. Enid trusted him, and she never once treated him like everyone else. She was the only light he had for ten years, and he spent every moment grateful for that.

Enid decided that Tyler was hers the moment her mother told her that they were taking in a foster child from Vermont. Her brother. Her pack. Her responsibility to be a good sister and make him feel like family. In ten years, she never once regretted that decision. Even if his insistence on seeing nothing but darkness exasperated her to no end.

Wednesday Addams had no desire whatsoever to attend Nevermore Academy, but her father had promised to help transfer her to a special program in Italy if she made it through the rest of the semester. She anticipated a dreary semester alleviated only by the progress she made on her novel. She did not anticipate Enid deciding that she was hers. Her best friend. Her pack. Her family. She did not anticipate meeting something new, dangerous, or someone who saw the world like she did. She didn’t expect to fall in love.

Words:    7,142 Chapters:    1/1