Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
“what’s your aesthetic” it’s super niche actually it’s called clothes i like. hope this helps
50K notes
·
View notes
Text
"if tumblr dies you can find me on bluesky" "if tumblr dies you can find me on Instagram" if tumblr dies you cannot find me. It's over. I'm free.
139K notes
·
View notes
Text
"it's all in your head" correct! unfortunately I am also in there
244K notes
·
View notes
Text
lock the fuck in?? no way dude. I am TUCKED the fuck in :) good night
52K notes
·
View notes
Text
I don't get the Chloe erasure in Double Exposure
To me, I understand wanting to show a Max Caulfield in her own game without being dependent on Chloe. If that's the case, you should have made sure to say "these gameplays are from a playthrough that chose save the bay" because I've been bitching about not showing what Max's life is like in the Post-Bay ending since LIS 2.(although an easier fix would've been to have Max and Chloe if you saved Chloe or Max and Warren if you saved the Bay in LIS 2 instead of fucking David)
However, I don't understand the marketing tactic of having Chloe's existence being almost non-existent in DE. Chloe is the very emotional core of LIS. Her and Max is what drove the first game's story. Chloe and Rachel drove BTS.
Now I imagine we're only getting Chloe's presence in texts, journal entries or phone calls. But to me that's really dumb. Imagine having an iconic dynamic like Max and Chloe and deciding we're going to act like that doesn't exist and force completely new characters on us instead of characters from Arcadia Bay.
Now to me there are two theories on why Chloe isn't in Vermont with Max
My personal theory. They're taking a break from each other to find themselves. Max chooses to continue to pursue their dreams and Chloe learns to better herself as a person like going to therapy, getting her education and getting a job to be a better person for Max.
The rumored and leaked bullshit break up theory. It's potentially leaked that they broke up and I hate it. Like yes, let's sacrifice an entire town and killing thousands of people, including Chloe's mother and all of Max's friends, only for Max and Chloe to break up. How the fuck is that "respecting the ending"
It also doesn't help that Ashly is a union VA and it feels like once again SE is fucking over the fans by having Rhianna potentially voicing Chloe. I'm sorry, I love Rhianna, but she does not work as an older Chloe, she worked for the BTS era Chloe only. and I cannot imagine Hannah being okay with working with anyone but Ashly as Chloe.
It's evidently clear this was supposed to be a completely different game with a different character entirely, but the D9 expose came out and SE course corrected to save D9's asses and had Max be the main character. For whatever reason they want to distance the player from seeing Chloe. I get the logic of suspense and the wait is worth the reward, but it seems to me they are alienating the audience as a giant fuck you and that is a terrible marketing strategy.
I really don't want to make this comparison because thinking of those vile Clementine comics makes me physically ill, but taking Max away from Chloe(Bae) and Warren and Kate(Bay) is like taking Clementine away from AJ, Louis and Violet.
I have a lot of reasons to boycott this game 1 2 3 4, but the lack of Chloe or characters from Arcadia for the save the Bay scenario is a large part and I really don't like the direction of this game.
To me the only way this game will be worth it is if it ends with Max saving Rachel in the end to quite literally save everyone and it ends with Max, Chloe and Rachel driving off into the rainbow sunset.
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
why are people out here shipping my boy tintin, hes aroace and does not understand love and i will take no criticism
223 notes
·
View notes
Text
HI it's the 20th anniversary of Half Life 2 (but I am late as always) and of course I had to return to paint my favourite Guy of All Time ...... intergalactic man of mystery ......
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
RAHHHHH
INTERACT WITH THIS IF YOU ARE AROACE BECAUSE WHY ARE THERE SO MANY OF US HERE
10K notes
·
View notes
Text
I think I managed to pin down why aroallo people are assumed to be more sexual than anyone else but I can't quite word it. Basically, romance is seen as a sort of gateway to sex but when there is no romance involved in the sex it's assumed that there is no gateway so there's this imaginary dichotomy of good pure moral sex with the love of your life which is divine, and meaningless flings with people you don't care about which is the immoral type of sex that is done by deviants who can't keep it in their pants and will sleep with anyone. So with this in mind you can guess what assumptions this creates about aromantic allosexuals
885 notes
·
View notes
Text
havent been here for a bit but the romanian aroace witch is still at work
1 note
·
View note
Note
My arospec experience is realizing at 16 that a marriage is not a really long pijama party
I mean… it can be if you want it to be >:]
65 notes
·
View notes
Text

me too morrissey. get the fuck out of my head though.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
SHUT UP MORRISSEY. I’m sobbing so much. ASLEEP BY THE SMITHS STOP NOW.
I really want to go
8 notes
·
View notes