glovanno

[glovanno]

The next stage of this chess game to protect American democracy, along with all other democracies and free peoples of the world, uses the Adversary's Anderson vs. trump ruling and their obsession with "States Rights!!!" against them.

Many people may have heard by now that Jack Smith is asking for the judge to dismiss donald j. trump's January 6th insurrectionist prosecution due to the presidential election; because even though the prosecution's case against donald j. trump is strong, and he's undoubtedly guilty of all charges, the U.S. Department of Justice can't prosecute a sitting president, but they'd very much like to continue prosecuting him in the future should the opportunity present itself; so they're asking for the judge to dismiss the case without prejudice to keep the possibility of donald j. trump's future criminal prosecution wide open.

This is a perfect addition to the chess game against donald j. trump; because it just denied donald trump and his entire MAGA cult the opportunity to try and make people forget that he's a disqualified insurrectionist who was never legally and constitutionally cleared of his disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again; and that he's attempting to illegally sneak back into presidential immunity without anyone noticing Congress never cleared him of his insurrectionist disqualification with the constitutionally necessary two-thirds vote of both houses . Jack Smith and the U.S. DOJ just loudly and proudly slammed that whopper right back upon the chess board for everyone to see, think about, and discuss amongst themselves. Brilliant!

Technically, the following chess strategy doesn't count as states attempting to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment on a disqualified insurrectionist federal/presidential candidate. The states are simply enforcing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment on themselves, on a state level, on state electors and a state governor, and so MAGA SCOTUS can go and pound sand; because they already ruled that states CAN enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment on state officers and agents in their Anderson vs. trump ruling.

MAGA SCOTUS can't force constitutionally sworn-in state electors and state governors to disqualify themselves from ever holding state office by violating Section 3 of the 14th Amendment by giving aid and comfort to a criminally indicted and federally prosecuted disqualified insurrectionist federal/presidential candidate named donald j. trump, so it's Checkmate City, game over, for dumb donald chump, MAGA SCOTUS, and the entire MAGA cult.

Kamala Harris' Existing Electoral College Votes: 226 + 89 Electoral College Votes From 8 Democrat Governors = 315 Electoral College Votes (Better-Than-2020 Landslide Victory!)

donald j. trump's Existing Electoral College Votes: 312 - 89 Electoral College Votes From 8 Democrat Governors = 223 Electoral College Votes (Worse-Than-2020 Landlisde Defeat!)

All it takes to protect American democracy, along with all other democracies and free peoples of the world, is 8 Democrat governors refusing to throw their careers away by giving aid and comfort to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted disqualified insurrectionist, donald j. trump. It shouldn't be too difficult to simply remind these 8 Democrat governors that donald j. trump isn't worth destroying their careers, American democracy, and the U.S. Constitution along with them. All it takes is 8 more emails from as many people as you can inspire to join this fight for humanity and freedom, and we'll win!

Arizona = 11 Electoral College Votes. 226+11=237 Electoral College Votes (270 to win). Contact Form: https://azgovernor.gov/office-arizona-governor/form/contact-governor-hobbs I'd choose "Legislation" as the subject and if you're not wanting to use your contact information, their contact information with address, phone number, and email addresses is all right there at the bottom of the webpage. This copies and pastes into the Comments box:

Dear Governor of the State of Arizona, Katie Hobbs,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any Arizona elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Arizona's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Katie Hobbs, as Governor of the State of Arizona, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of Arizona due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of Arizona's elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of Arizona's electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

Kansas = 6 Electoral College Votes. 237+6=243 Electoral College Votes (270 to win). Contact Form: https://governor.kansas.gov/questions_form/ Local contact information if you need it for filling in the contact form: https://governor.kansas.gov/contact/ There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. This copies and pastes into the Comment/Question/Concern box:

Dear Governor of the State of Kansas, Laura Kelly,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any Kansas elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Kansas' unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Laura Kelly, as Governor of the State of Kansas, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of Kansas due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of Kansas' elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of Kansas' electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

Kentucky = 8 Electoral College Votes. 243+8=251 Electoral College Votes (270 to win). Contact Form: https://governor.ky.gov/contact/contact-us Local contact information is right there on the contact form page. There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. This copies and pastes into the Comments box:

Dear Governor of the State of Kentucky, Andy Beshear,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any Kentucky elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Kentucky's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Andy Beshear, as Governor of the State of Kentucky, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of Kentucky due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of Kentucky's elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of Kentucky's electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

Maine = 4 Electoral College Votes. 251+4=255 Electoral College Votes (270 to win). Contact Form: https://www.maine.gov/governor/mills/contact/share-your-opinion Local contact information if you need it for filling in the contact form: https://www.maine.gov/governor/mills/contact There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. This copies and pastes into the Message box:

Dear Governor of the State of Maine, Janet Mills,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any Maine elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Maine's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Janet Mills, as Governor of the State of Maine, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of Maine due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of Maine's elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of Maine's electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

Michigan = 15 Electoral College Votes. 255+15=270 Electoral College Votes (270 to win). Contact Form: https://somgovweb.state.mi.us/GovRelations/ContactGovernor.aspx Local contact information if you need it for filling in the contact form: https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/contact There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. This copies and pastes into the Description of Issue box:

Dear Governor of the State of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any Michigan elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Michigan's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Gretchen Whitmer, as Governor of the State of Michigan, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of Michigan due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of Michigan's elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of Michigan's electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

North Carolina = 16 Electoral College Votes. 270+16=286 Electoral College Votes (Make It A Better-Than-2020 Landslide Victory!). Contact Form: https://governor.nc.gov/contact/contact-governor-cooper Local contact information is right there on the contact form page. There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. This appears to fall into the "Other Issue" category. This copies and pastes into the Message box:

Dear Governor of the State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any North Carolina elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by North Carolina's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Roy Cooper, as Governor of the State of North Carolina, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of North Carolina due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of North Carolina's elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of North Carolina's electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

Pennsylvania = 19 Electoral College Votes. 286+19=305 Electoral College Votes (Make It A Better-Than-2020 Landslide Victory!). Contact Form: https://www.pa.gov/form/governor/contact.html Local contact information is right there on the contact form page. There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. This appears to fall into the "Legislation" category. This copies and pastes into the Message box:

Dear Governor of the State of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it clear to insurrectionist presidential candidate, Donald J. Trump, he'd require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear his insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding federal office again. Accordingly, should any Pennsylvania elector attempt to elect Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Pennsylvania's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, no state governor can sign such certificates without giving aid and comfort to a disqualified insurrectionist. Please seek legal counsel on Donald Trump's insurrectionist disqualification.

Wisconsin = 10 Electoral College Votes. 305+10=315 Electoral College Votes (Make It A Better-Than-2020 Landslide Victory!). Contact Form: https://wi.accessgov.com/public/Forms/Page/governor/voice-an-opinion/0 Local contact information if you need it for filling in the contact form: https://evers.wi.gov/Pages/connect.aspx There isn't an email address in their contact information, so you can fill in whatever you like. Under "Affiliation," I typed: 2024 Presidential Election Certification Issues. This copies and pastes into the Share Your Opinions box:

Dear Governor of the State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers,

On March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States made it perfectly clear to criminally indicted and federally prosecuted insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump, that while states cannot enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on a candidate seeking to hold, or attempting to hold, federal office, it would require 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate to clear Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any state or federal office again. As you are well aware, those 87 Democrats in the U.S. Congress haven't cleared Donald J. Trump of his insurrectionist disqualification. Accordingly, should any Wisconsin elector attempt to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as 47th President of the United States, they'd be giving aid and comfort to a known disqualified insurrectionist, and would therefore be instantly disqualified from serving as a lawfully certified elector, and any certificates of ascertainment created by Wisconsin's unlawful electors would be instantly null and void. Additionally, per Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should you, Tony Evers, as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, sign and attempt to legitimize any unlawfully created certificates of ascertainment attempting to elect disqualified insurrectionist Donald J. Trump as the 47th President of the United States of America, you would also be instantly disqualified from ever holding any state or federal office again, and would therefore be required to immediately resign as the Governor of the State of Wisconsin due to your insurrectionist disqualification, unless you were cleared by a two-thirds vote of Wisconsin's elected Republicans and Democrats.

Please seek immediate legal counsel and choose your path, and the paths of Wisconsin's electors, wisely.

Regards,

We The People of the United States of America

[glovanno]

Relevant article. Ctrl + F and type "congress" into the search bar. Click the down button until you get to the second or third mention of this phrase. It will share a quote and a summarizing statement from a member of Congress (?) confirming that this is, in fact, absolutely true. That is to say, the fact that there's still the opportunity to bar him from the presidency on January 5th or 6th, 2025, perhaps even beforehand, and perhaps, perhaps even afterward. (Here's a link to an article that discusses the impeachment for the afterward portion.)

Here's a link to another article from last year that discusses barring him on January 5, 2025, in case he wins.

We need to pressure the Democrats to do this. We need to pressure them and the Electoral College (if possible) to do this. We need to pressure them to bar him from the presidency before anything disastrous can happen. If we can gather all the Trump voters who regret their decisions (esp. the ones who voted for economic purposes only), we can convince Democrat leaders that they revoke their votes and want to bar him from becoming president again in the name of democracy.

For All Who Believe President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and House and Senate Democrats Won't Enforce donald. j. trump's Insurrectionist Disqualification, Please Remember This Is A Chess Game With Multiple Pieces and Pathways to Checkmate donald j. trump and his entire MAGA cult.

I understand that some people reading the daily reminders of donald j. trump's Section 3/14A insurrectionist disqualification might want to believe it's some kind of misinformation because it's a major story that's being buried and kept out of American and global mindsets and thoughts, but there are a lot of trained artists here on Tumblr; and trained artists fully understand that your art will never read or come across properly if the negative space(s) surrounding your art don't perfectly communicate the art that they contain.

For instance, the negative space around your hand reinforces that your hand looks and reads right when you're looking at it, but it the negative space/air space surrounding your hand and fingers was identical to the negative space/air space enveloping a still life arrangement of fruit and random objects, your brain would be screaming that, for some strange reason, your hand and fingers actually look and read like a still life arrangement of fruit and random objects because your mind automatically fills in the blanks. donald j. trumps Section 3/14A insurrectionist disqualification reads right because it is right.

It doesn't matter that people are trying to help people forget, and hoping people will forget, that donald j. trump shouldn't have been allowed to run for office because of his Section 3/14A insurrectionist disqualification. Those people are desperately hoping no one will remember or start talking about the fact that donald j. trump was only allowed on the 2024 presidential ballot to avoid election chaos and disruption, but the Supreme Court made it clear that donald j. trump appearing on the ballot didn't clear his Section 3/14A insurrectionist disqualification, and that Democrats could enforce his insurrectionist disqulification the moment he was declared President-elect; and they could also enforce it upon all state electors in the Electoral College; and they could also choose to enforce it upon donald j. trump during the January 6, 2025 certification; and they could even enforce it after he was inaugurated if they wanted to hand the presidency to j.d. vance and still end American democracy and the U.S. Constitution via a j.d. vance presidency as a result of dragging their heels on the matter.

Here's a picture of the moment when donald trump told President Zelensky that Ukraine is at the mercy of putin and trump:

I get that there's a lot of anxiety surrounding this issue, and so to further empower people to address that anxiety and guarantee that President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and House and Senate Democrats will enforce donald j. trump's Section 3/14A insurrectionist disqualification by or on December 17, 2024, anyone who wants and needs futher assurances that people will do what they're legally required to do per their oath to the American people and the U.S. Constitution can simply contact President Zelensky of Ukraine via https://www.president.gov.ua/en and inform and remind him that donald j. trump is permanently disqualified from ever holding any federal or state office in the United States again because of his January 6th, 2021 insurrection and his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. President Zelensky is meeting with NATO on Tuesday, November 26, 2024, and you could give the people that donald j. trump wants to gift wrap and give to putin for his new Soviet Union a lot to talk about while completely delegitimizing and invalidating donald j. trump's illegal election and presidency to the entire world.

If you need help translating President Zelensky's website, there's an "EN" selection in the upper-right corner of the site, but you won't be able to use it when you choose the "Information Request" form to contact President Zelensky about this matter. When you click the "Information Request" form, you'll have a number of checkbox options to select from. You can use Google Translate to translate everything if you like, but the bottom checkbox is "Email" (which will present you with an additional text box) and that's where you'll need to enter a valid email address that you don't mind using to receive a security confirmation code that will allow your message to President Zelensky to go through. The text box at the top of the form is where you can enter any name or identification you want to use to identify yourself to President Zelensky. The large text box is where you can help protect Ukraine from being conquered and colonized by putin's plans to restore the Soviet Union at Europe's and the entire world's expense, so that's where you'll need to type something along the lines of this (because you can't copy and paste this into that text box):

Dear President Zelensky,

Ukraine's present and future rely on you knowing and understanding this truth: Donald J. Trump is permanently disqualified from ever holding any federal or state office in the United States due to his January 6th, 2021 insurrection and his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution permanently disqualifies all insurrectionists, Donald J. Trump included, from ever holding any federal or state office again without 70 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the U.S. Senate voting to remove his insurrectionist disqualification before December 17, 2024. Should Donald J. Trump's insurrectionist disqualification remain on December 17, 2024, no state elector in the U.S. Electoral College can legally vote to elect Donald J. Trump, or create any Electors Certificates to legally elect Donald J. Trump as President of the United States, because the state electors and the Electors Certificates would be illegal and void due to them attempting to give aid and comfort to a legally disqualified insurrectionist, Donald J. Trump. Please know and understand that Donald J. Trump is engaging in the federal crime of attempting to hold office while being a legally disqualified insurrectionist; and he has no legal authority or right to attempt to involve himself in Ukraine's, NATO's, or any other country's affairs in any way. Please contact President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Democratic Leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries immediately to discuss Ukraine's current and future alliance with the United States of America. Thank you.

Once you've typed such a message into the contact form for President Zelensky, you'll need to enter the CAPTCHA code at the bottom of the form and press the submit button (you may have to reset the CAPTCHA code if it's not working). Once you press the submit button, you'll be taken to a confirmation page where you'll enter the security/confirmation code that you'll receive via the email address you entered for President Zelensky to contact you. Once you enter that code into the confirmation box and submit it, you'll see a confimation notice that your message was sent.

Sometimes, the best way to ease anxiety is to do something empowering and reaffirming; and some people who experience anxiety might find that completely and permanently delegitimizing and disqualifiing donald j. trump from ever being President of the United States again, and also completely humiliating and discrediting him in front of the entire world, would be somewhat cathartic, calming, and empowering. It's possible that 10/10 anti-MAGA talk therapists would agree with this and be strongly supportive of an empowerment exercise such as this. And if you find this exercise to be cathartic and satisfying, please remember to also share the donald trump disqualification information with everyone you know and write to your elected representatives, Democratic Leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, Marc Elias and Democracy Docket, and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington about donald j. trump's Section 3/14A insurrectionist disqualification.

Thanks again to everyone involved in protecting the entire world from donald j. trump, his MAGA cult, and their global dictator allies.

Every person joining this fight in any way is far more powerful than the entirety of nearly 77 million MAGA voters, AND donald j. trump, AND all of donald j. trump's MAGA cult "Republicans" in the House and Senate, AND all of donald trump's corrupt MAGA judges, AND all of donald trump's wealthy donors, AND all of the richest people in the world combined, AND all of the world's dictators AND the entirety of their entire political parties and supporters combined.

You're far more powerful, unstoppable, and inevitable than all of those people combined because you have the truth and the law on your side. And in this fight, when we fight, we win. We're already winning, and we're going to keep winning, because no one can stop the truth and the law from winning this fight for every democracy and all free peoples on earth. It's kind of a big freakin' deal!

[glovanno]

For anyone wondering, this (mostly) seems to be legitimate according to this article from PolitiFact but according to PolitiFact, there's a small percentage chance of this happening... unless, of course, we can try to pressure them to do so. I sent this message to both members of Congress and urge you to do the same thing since this may help us prevent a Trump presidency if a recount/revote doesn't happen. I mean, of course, it doesn't mention the Democrat-specific voting part, but the 2/3 part seems to be verified. However, to be fair, the PolitiFact article seems to ignore a lot of things mentioned here so that part could be legitimate but being ignored in favor of promoting the idea that this task is impossible and that we are doomed to a worsened Trump presidency. Please send this message to Congress either way so we can have a bigger chance of this happening.

This is a November 12th, 2024 reminder that on March 4th, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States ordered donald j. trump to have 87 Democrats in both houses of Congress remove his insurrectionist disqualification from ever holding any federal office again; because if he didn't, nothing, including MAGA SCOTUS, could stop Democrats in the House and Senate from disqualifying him; even if he wins the 2024 presidential election. He failed to do so prior to November 5, 2024. He's now counted down to his last 19 congressional business days of opportunity to resolve this matter.

Between today, November 12th, 2024 and December 17th, 2024, donald j. trump has no choice but to go to Congress and have 70 Democrats in the House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the Senate vote to remove his insurrectionist disqualification, as he was ordered to do by SCOTUS on March 4th, 2024, or he's not legally the President Elect and cannot be inaugurated, sworn in, or hold federal office again on January 20, 2025. The clock is ticking!

What will happen on December 17th, 2024 if donald j. trump hasn't cleared his insurrectionist disqualification via a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress? Every Elector attempting to elect a known insurrectionist will be disqualified from being an Elector for engaging in and furthering insurrection against the United States. It is impossible for donald j. trump to remain as President Elect on December 17th, 2024; because every Elector in every state who attempts to vote for donald j. trump for President would then have to be immediately cleared of their insurrectionist disqualification by a two-thirds vote of their state legislature so that they could then vote for the only remaining legal, non-insurrectionist candidate. If donald j. trump hasn't cleared his insurrectionist disqualification by December 17, 2024, the only legal presidential candidate the Electoral College can vote for is Kamala Harris.

Article 2: Clause 3: Electoral College See also: Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Contingent election, Electoral College abolition amendment, Efforts to reform the United States Electoral College, and National Popular Vote Interstate Compact The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse [sic] by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse [sic] the President. But in chusing [sic] the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse [sic] from them by Ballot the Vice President.

Electoral College Elector Selection Process Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution requires each state legislature to determine how electors for the state are to be chosen, but it disqualifies any person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, from being an elector. Under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, any person who has sworn an oath to support the United States Constitution in order to hold either a state or federal office, and later rebelled against the United States directly or by giving assistance to those doing so, is disqualified from being an elector. Congress may remove this disqualification by a two-thirds vote in each house. (Wikipedia)

For those who would argue this is misinformation due to donald trump's MAGA cult allies in the Senate preventing him from being convicted, the bipartisan congressional J6 Committee investigated donald j. trump for insurrection, found him guilty of insurrection, referred him for criminal prosecution for insurrection, and donald j. trump was indicted and is currently being prosecuted for insurrection by the Department of Justice (unless the case gets dropped). Section 3 of the 14th Amendment doesn't require a formal conviction, so the congressional investigation, finding of insurrection, and the congressional committee referral for criminal prosecution, along with the federal indictment and prosecution for insurrection, can easily be used to keep donald j. trump from ever holding federal office again. Per the Supreme Court of the United States' own Berger Test to disqualify judges, the ridiculous, nonsensical, unethical and illegal MAGA SCOTUS majority "ruling" pertaining to their attempted declaration of donald j. trump's permanent immunity from federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment means absolutely nothing for him, or any other insurrectionist; because it lacks standing in precedent, law, constitutionality, and relevance.

The three dissenting justices clarify that the only matter that was actually legally settled and, therefore, legally enforceable, pertained to state actions, not federal law enforcement actions against a disqualified insurrectionist presidential or federal candidate, such as donald j. trump, committing the federal crime of being an insurrectionist attempting to hold office without having their insurrectionist disqualification removed via a two-thirds vote of both houses. And so it is legal fact that the Supreme Court did, in fact, order donald j. trump to have his insurrectionist disqualification removed by a two-thirds vote of both houses on March 4th, 2024; it's just that donald j. trump and his legal team were too illiterate and unintelligent to actually read what was legal and had standing (state enforcement against federal candidates), and what didn't (MAGA SCOTUS whining and crying about federal enforcement against federal candidates/their presidential candidate). And MAGA SCOTUS is now permanently legally barred from ever addressing any matter pertaining to federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against donald j. trump, so they can't even try to interfere on his behalf again should Democrats in the House of Representatives and the Senate demand and force a vote on the matter of donald j. trump's disqualification for holding federal office.

Berger v. United States, 255 U.S. 22 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court decision overruling a trial court decision by U.S. District Court Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis against Rep. Victor L. Berger, a Congressman for Wisconsin's 5th district and the founder of the Social Democratic Party of America, and several other German-American defendants who were convicted of violating the Espionage Act by publicizing anti-interventionist views during World War I.

The case was argued on December 9, 1920, and decided on January 31, 1921, with an opinion by Justice Joseph McKenna and dissents by Justices William R. Day, James Clark McReynolds, and Mahlon Pitney. The Supreme Court held that Judge Landis was properly disqualified as trial judge based on an affidavit filed by the German defendants asserting that Judge Landis' public anti-German statements should disqualify him from presiding over the trial of the defendants.

The House of Representatives twice denied Berger his seat in the House due to his original conviction for espionage using Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution regarding denying office to those who supported "insurrection or rebellion". The Supreme Court overturned the verdict in 1921 in Berger v. U.S., and Berger won three successive terms in the House in the 1920s.

Per the United States Supreme Court's "Berger test" that states that to disqualify ANY judge in the United States of America: 1) a party files an affidavit claiming personal bias or prejudice demonstrating an "objectionable inclination or disposition of the judge" and 2) claim of bias is based on facts antedating the trial.

All 6 criminal MAGA insurrectionist and trump-loyalist U.S. Supreme Court Justices who've repeatedly and illegally ruled in donald j. trump's favor are as disqualified from issuing any rulings pertaining to donald j. trump (a German immigrant) as the United States Supreme Court ruled U.S. District Court Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis was when he attempted to deny Victor L. Berger (a German immigrant) from holding office for violating the Espionage Act and supporting or engaging in insurrection or rebellion against the United States of America.

RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Rule 8. Disbarment and Disciplinary Action

Whenever a member of the Bar of this Court has been disbarred or suspended from practice in any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the Bar of this Court, the Court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this Court and affording the member an opportunity to show cause, within 40 days, why a disbarment order should not be entered. Upon response, or if no response is timely filed, the Court will enter an appropriate order.

After reasonable notice and an opportunity to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken, and after a hearing if material facts are in dispute, the Court may take any appropriate disciplinary action against any attorney who is admitted to practice before it for conduct unbecoming a member of the Bar or for failure to comply with these Rules or any Rule or order of the Court.

The only misinformation that exists surrounding the Anderson vs. trump ruling is the belief that the MAGA SCOTUS ruling on federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against donald j. trump settled the matter and handed him permanent immunity from prosecution should he ever commit the federal crime of attempting to hold federal office. In legal fact, MAGA SCOTUS' nonsensical ruling attempting to grant donald j. trump permanent immunity from prosecution for insurrection is grounds for immediate and permanent disbarment; as they're clearly attempting to legislate from the bench and prevent Congress from legislating in a way that's unfavorable to their presidential candidate.

This is the only pertinent and legally important part of the Anderson vs. trump ruling with regards to federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against donald j. trump or any other insurrectionist committing the federal crime of attempting to hold office without first having their insurrectionist disqualification removed by a two-thirds vote of both houses:

Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson Opinion on the Majority Ruling (supremecourt.gov):

Yet the majority goes further. Even though “[a]ll nine Members of the Court” agree that this independent and sufficient rationale resolves this case, five Justices go on. They decide novel constitutional questions to insulate this Court and petitioner from future controversy. Ante, at 13. Although only an individual State’s action is at issue here, the majority opines on which federal actors can enforce Section 3, and how they must do so. The majority announces that a disqualification for insurrection can occur only when Congress enacts a particular kind of legislation pursuant to Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. In doing so, the majority shuts the door on other potential means of federal enforcement. We cannot join an opinion that decides momentous and difficult issues unnecessarily, and we therefore concur only in the judgment.

Yet the Court continues on to resolve questions not before us. In a case involving no federal action whatsoever, the Court opines on how federal enforcement of Section 3 must proceed. Congress, the majority says, must enact legislation under Section 5 prescribing the procedures to “ ‘ “ascertain[ ] what particular individuals” ’ ” should be disqualified. Ante, at 5 (quoting Griffin’s Case, 11 F. Cas. 7, 26 (No. 5,815) (CC Va. 1869) (Chase, Circuit Justice)). These musings are as inadequately supported as they are gratuitous.

To start, nothing in Section 3’s text supports the majority’s view of how federal disqualification efforts must operate. Section 3 states simply that “[n]o person shall” hold certain positions and offices if they are oathbreaking insurrectionists. Amdt. 14. Nothing in that unequivocal bar suggests that implementing legislation enacted under Section 5 is “critical” (or, for that matter, what that word means in this context). Ante, at 5. In fact, the text cuts the opposite way. Section 3 provides that when an oathbreaking insurrectionist is disqualified, “Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” It is hard to understand why the Constitution would require a congressional supermajority to remove a disqualification if a simple majority could nullify Section 3’s operation by repealing or declining to pass implementing legislation. Even petitioner’s lawyer acknowledged the “tension” in Section 3 that the majority’s view creates. See Tr. of Oral Arg. 31.

Similarly, nothing else in the rest of the Fourteenth Amendment supports the majority’s view. Section 5 gives Congress the “power to enforce [the Amendment] by appropriate legislation.” Remedial legislation of any kind, however, is not required. All the Reconstruction Amendments (including the due process and equal protection guarantees and prohibition of slavery) “are self-executing,” meaning that they do not depend on legislation. City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 524 (1997); see Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3, 20 (1883). Similarly, other constitutional rules of disqualification, like the two-term limit on the Presidency, do not require implementing legislation. See, e.g., Art. II, §1, cl. 5 (Presidential Qualifications); Amdt. 22 (Presidential Term Limits). Nor does the majority suggest otherwise. It simply creates a special rule for the insurrection disability in Section 3.

The majority is left with next to no support for its requirement that a Section 3 disqualification can occur only pursuant to legislation enacted for that purpose. It cites Griffin’s Case, but that is a nonprecedential, lower court opinion by a single Justice in his capacity as a circuit judge. See ante, at 5 (quoting 11 F. Cas., at 26). Once again, even petitioner’s lawyer distanced himself from fully embracing this case as probative of Section 3’s meaning. See Tr. of Oral Arg. 35–36. The majority also cites Senator Trumbull’s statements that Section 3 “ ‘provide[d] no means for enforcing’ ” itself. Ante, at 5 (quoting Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 1st Sess., 626 (1869)). The majority, however, neglects to mention the Senator’s view that “[i]t is the [F]ourteenth [A]mendment that prevents a person from holding office,” with the proposed legislation simply “affor[ding] a more efficient and speedy remedy” for effecting the disqualification. Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 1st Sess., at 626–627.

Ultimately, under the guise of providing a more “complete explanation for the judgment,” ante, at 13, the majority resolves many unsettled questions about Section 3. It forecloses judicial enforcement of that provision, such as might occur when a party is prosecuted by an insurrectionist and raises a defense on that score. The majority further holds that any legislation to enforce this provision must prescribe certain procedures “ ‘tailor[ed]’ ” to Section 3, ante, at 10, ruling out enforcement under general federal statutes requiring the government to comply with the law. By resolving these and other questions, the majority attempts to insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to their holding federal office.

“What it does today, the Court should have left undone.” Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 158 (2000) (Breyer, J., dissenting). The Court today needed to resolve only a single question: whether an individual State may keep a Presidential candidate found to have engaged in insurrection off its ballot. The majority resolves much more than the case before us. Although federal enforcement of Section 3 is in no way at issue, the majority announces novel rules for how that enforcement must operate. It reaches out to decide Section 3 questions not before us, and to foreclose future efforts to disqualify a Presidential candidate under that provision. In a sensitive case crying out for judicial restraint, it abandons that course.

Section 3 serves an important, though rarely needed, role in our democracy. The American people have the power to vote for and elect candidates for national office, and that is a great and glorious thing. The men who drafted and ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, however, had witnessed an “insurrection [and] rebellion” to defend slavery. §3. They wanted to ensure that those who had participated in that insurrection, and in possible future insurrections, could not return to prominent roles. Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming President. Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority’s effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision. Because we would decide only the issue before us, we concur only in the judgment.

What all of that means is that between now and December 17th, 2024, donald j. trump has no choice but to go to Congress and have 70 Democrats in the House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the Senate vote to remove his insurrectionist disqualification, as he was ordered to do by SCOTUS on March 4th, 2024, or he's not legally the President Elect and cannot be inaugurated, sworn in, or hold federal office again on January 20, 2025. The clock is down to 19 days, and ticking!

Here's why this will work: donald trump's legal tactics are deny, attempt to wiggle out of it on technicalities, and delay, delay, delay. Well, from November 2023 to March 4, 2024, donald trump not only said that he was never an officer of the United States, but that he also never swore an oath to support the United States Constitution. And then he said that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says nothing about running for office, only holding office, and since he's only running for office, nothing can keep him off the ballot. And that's where this has finally caught up to him.

SCOTUS illegally took the case to begin with. Per the U.S. Constitution, SCOTUS was required to kick the case back to Congress immediately to force a two-thirds vote of both houses to remove or enforce donald trump's insurrectionist disqualification, and that would've settled the entire matter within a day. But they illegally denied Congress the ability to vote on it at the time, illegally legislated from the bench to keep donald trump on the ballot by illegally amending Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, and dismissed the clear two-thirds vote requirement to replace it with "Congress must pass new legislation and amend Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in order to keep insurrectionists off of the ballot and out of office in the future. All six MAGA SCOTUS injustices can now be immediately and permanently disbarred from ever judging or practicing law anywhere in the United States now and in the future for that illegal legislating from the bench; because the U.S. Constitution clearly says that the Judiciary can never interfere with Congress legislating, or with the President enforcing the laws of the United States.

donald trump and his allies figured that was a win, that SCOTUS couldn't be challenged, that the Democrats could never get legislation passed to keep him off the ballot or from holding office again, and the matter was dropped. But that's where he was wrong; because Section 3 of the 14th Amendment still reads, and only legally reads, that the only way an insurrectionist can hold federal office again is by a two-thirds vote removing their insurrectionist disqualification in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; and that means that now that donald trump can't try and use the technicality of "I'm not even trying to hold office, I'm just running for office," and he's actively trying to hold office with no technicality wiggle room, donald trump's only path to the White House is to have 70 Democrats in the House of Representatives and 17 Democrats in the Senate vote to remove his insurrectionist disqualification by December 17th, 2017; and his favorite tactic of delay, delay, delay won't work because delaying means he can't be inaugurated, sworn in, and serve as the 47th President of the United States; and that means Kamala Harris would become 47th President of the United States by default.

donald j. trump is actively engaging in the federal crime of attempting to hold federal office while being an impeached and criminally indicted insurrectionist. Chuck Schumer can easily force the Section 3 vote in the Senate; and if donald j. trump gets no Democrat votes in the Senate, then the House vote is unnecessary. If MAGA mike johnson refuses to allow a House vote, then that's an instant disqualification for insurrectionist donald j. trump.

Hakeem Jeffries Democratic Leader of the House of Representatives https://www.congress.gov/member/hakeem-jeffries/J000294 https://democraticleader.house.gov/contact

Chuck Schumer Democratic Leader of the Senate https://www.congress.gov/member/charles-schumer/S000148 https://www.schumer.senate.gov/contact/message-chuck

Here's a form letter that'll be under 1980 characters no matter if you're contacting House Democratic Leader Jeffries or Senate Democratic Leader Schumer. Just copy and paste the text into the contact form. If these Democratic leaders receive hundreds of these messages from different IP/Internet addresses, we'll have their attemtion. If they receive thousands of these messages from different IP/Internet addresses, we might see this in the news. If they receive tens of thousands of these messages from different IP/Internet addresses, we might finally be free from the threat of another donald trump presidency (turnout is everything in this fight for our human and civil rights, freedoms, and literal survival as non-trump supporters and non-MAGA cult members).

Dear Democratic Leader Jeffries,

My family, loved ones, friends, and I are greatly concerned that Donald J. Trump and all of his MAGA allies, supporters, enablers, donors, and voters have what clearly appear to be genocidal intentions to all American non-Trump supporters and voters whom they call, "traitors, anti-American, enemies from within, very bad people, very dangerous people, racists, radicals, extremists, communists, Marxists, fascists, thugs, liars, sick, ugly, stupid, mindless, thoughtless, brainless, disabled, deranged, criminals, rapists, cheaters, sleazebags, low-lifes, scum, trash, genetically inferior, weak, poison, insects, animals, rats, snakes, and vermin" on a regular basis. As I'm sure that you and all elected Democrat representatives at every level across the United States are aware, Donald J. Trump was not granted permanent immunity from federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in the SCOTUS ruling for Anderson vs. Trump on March 4, 2024; and the moment Donald J. Trump was declared the President Elect, he was committing the federal crime of attempting to hold office while being an impeached and indicted insurrectionist without first having that insurrectionist disqualification removed by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress. Donald J. Trump and his MAGA cult appear to intend to not only deport 15 million people, but to also engage in undeniable genocide and ethnic and cultural cleansing against half the population of the United States (using voter registration as a "vermin" purge mechanism). Thankfully, per the Supreme Court's own Berger Test to disqualify judges, Donald J. Trump's MAGA SCOTUS allies can never intervene on any of his legal cases again, so if you would please bring the matter of a two-thirds vote to the House of Representatives for an immediate vote by no later than December 11th, 2024, my fellow Americans and I would greatly appreciate it.

Respectully,

An American patriot

Dear Democratic Leader Schumer,

My family, loved ones, friends, and I are greatly concerned that Donald J. Trump and all of his MAGA allies, supporters, enablers, donors, and voters have what clearly appear to be genocidal intentions to all American non-Trump supporters and voters whom they call, "traitors, anti-American, enemies from within, very bad people, very dangerous people, racists, radicals, extremists, communists, Marxists, fascists, thugs, liars, sick, ugly, stupid, mindless, thoughtless, brainless, disabled, deranged, criminals, rapists, cheaters, sleazebags, low-lifes, scum, trash, genetically inferior, weak, poison, insects, animals, rats, snakes, and vermin" on a regular basis. As I'm sure that you and all elected Democrat representatives at every level across the United States are aware, Donald J. Trump was not granted permanent immunity from federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in the SCOTUS ruling for Anderson vs. Trump on March 4, 2024; and the moment Donald J. Trump was declared the President Elect, he was committing the federal crime of attempting to hold office while being an impeached and indicted insurrectionist without first having that insurrectionist disqualification removed by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress. Donald J. Trump and his MAGA cult appear to intend to not only deport 15 million people, but to also engage in undeniable genocide and ethnic and cultural cleansing against half the population of the United States (using voter registration as a "vermin" purge mechanism). Thankfully, per the Supreme Court's own Berger Test to disqualify judges, Donald J. Trump's MAGA SCOTUS allies can never intervene on any of his legal cases again, so if you would please bring the matter of a two-thirds vote to the Senate for an immediate vote by no later than December 11th, 2024, my fellow Americans and I would greatly appreciate it.

Respectully,

An American patriot

[glovanno]

To be honest, I realize that I am too eccentric for the average person, too shattered in spirit and psychological functioning, possibly too mundane and pretentious, too solemn and restrictive, too morbid and grim, too much of a sexual "freak," yet too "vanilla" to the actual "sex freaks," too overbearing, critical, and overanalytical (yet not analytical enough), too pseudointellectual (or "genuinely intellectual," for some others...), too "innocent," "cutesy," and puerile, and yet too mature, grandiloquent, and old-fashioned. I am definitely too much for the average person.

I genuinely believe I do not fit into this world. I do not belong among anyone. Only one person I have met doesn't cause me to wish to cease to exist or sentiments of peril... aside from my mother and occasionally, my brother. I will cherish him forever, I hope.

Everyone else causes me to experience awkward and discomfiting sentiments. I occasionally wish to delete most of my social network accounts and only browse for art and academic subjects in order to experience improved psychological health.

Why would anyone wish for me to exist, particularly in their presence? Why do people attempt to speak to me, to interact with me? Why would anyone... like me...? I do not understand.

At the same time, it tends to be obvious a majority of the time that I do not fit in anywhere. It's the reason I do not maintain conversations with others anymore... I wish to spare myself from the sensations of tension and gawkiness within myself.

[glovanno]

I may understand myself now... growing up in the 2000s felt as though, in some ways, I was growing up in the 20th century. It helps that I was born and raised in Delaware which contains plenty of vintage aesthetics in architecture and landmarks to this day. The movies I'd watch such as Nanny McPhee and Stewart Little didn't help either. When reading history books in 1st grade from the late 19th-20th century, especially the story of Alexander Graham Bell, it was easy for me to imagine myself growing up walking those streets and living in those houses. As a child in the early 2010s, it was somewhat easy to adjust—though, it still felt different—but by the mid-2010s when I was but a teen, I was suddenly feeling out of place, struggling to fit in with my peers and wondering why everything suddenly felt completely flawed. My love of the Disney ducks in 2016 was only my awakening—it was the vessel that allowed me to become open to truly appreciating the mid-20th century and embrace the fact that I did not feel at home in the century in which I reside.

It also didn't help that I grew up listening to 80s music with parents who were rockers or the fact that around the early 2010s, I was already watching movies from the 80s & 90s such as Beetlejuice and The Coneheads, and loving them. This is why it's difficult for me to let go of 80s music, especially of the rock genre, despite my wish to live as accurately to the mid-20th century (esp. the 1940s & 1950s) as possible.

It turns out it was always in my nature to enjoy these things. I'm uncertain what wired my encephalon to assume these inclinations since my early childhood but it cannot be rewired, unfortunately.

I suppose I shall have to deal with the fact that I am different from my peers and strive to adjust. I've always been eccentric in other ways, so it's not such a big deal, is it? This isn't my worst trait, of course. It's simply an uncommon one—one that's been drilled into me for years but I never realized until I peered back into my memories.

[glovanno]

I wonder how many eras of Earth's natural history have been completely lost just because they didn't make a visible mark on the planet.

I wonder how many species have been forever lost to time only because they never fossilized or left behind and traces of their existence.

Who knows what incredible, terrifying, or seemingly alien forms of life once called this planet home, that we'll never know once existed?

Ancient life is incredible. It makes me sad to know that so many species of flora and fauna and everything in between will never be known. Things so odd they seem straight out of movies.

Life and evolution are just so incredible, and deserve so much more appreciation than they get.

[glovanno]

Humanity is nature's worst creation. May the universe strike us all to perish.

[glovanno]

Anybody remember back when you were able to see the colors of a person's blog through their reblogged comment? I liked that and wish they'd bring it back.

[glovanno]

How most people see me: Opinions? Who said I have my own opinions?

What I actually am: You are factually incorrect and I have evidence to support this notion...