Tumgik
myriad-rainbows · 4 hours
Text
3K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 4 hours
Text
is it needlessly pedantic of me to get annoyed at people who think any 5/7/5 structure is an actual haiku? yeah, because haiku is innately untranslatable and therefore following the actual structure is not just pointless but actively impossible. however, this does not change the fact that i am annoyed. motherfucker doesn't even incorporate a kigo.
2K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 4 hours
Text
watching the x files is like wow. love really is real. also what the fuck was that thing
5K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 4 hours
Text
Tags via @squidpunch that made me snort-laugh: #several folds you say? #several folds which werent meant to get stitched down like that
ⓘ A sewing machine is a device that provides a several-fold increase of the speed at which you can make mistakes
13K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 7 hours
Text
i think a lot of people would be happier if they viewed labels like homosexual and transgender as social technologies rather than identities
21K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 10 hours
Text
[I.D.: the "gee timmy how come your mom lets you have two hot dogs" meme, edited to replace the heads and hot dogs with different brassicas. the text now says "gee brassica oleracea! how come your mom lets you have this much phenotypic diversity?" Brassica oleracea answers, "Artificial selection!" End I.D.]
Tumblr media
we are not getting out of the plant blog allegations with this one
6K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 10 hours
Text
I think there’s an argument to be made that protecting the children from relatively tame shadows of adults concepts actually makes things worse for them.
Like nothing is worse for me as an adult than the entirely unwarranted and unwanted sense of fear or scandalization from perfectly common stuff. And I don’t blame some wonderful TV show for using the word “fuck” or showing a nipple. My responses to those things are entirely constructed and cultural, and those shows are often doing me a kindness by giving me a context in which to safely re-examine them and my relationship to them.
And I just think actually there were a lot more opportunities to have a well adjusted outlook on life for the kids whose parents just told them what fuck meant.
12K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 12 hours
Text
Do You Know This Disabled Character?
Tumblr media
Nathan J. Northland is Hard of Hearing and has a permanently injured arm.
Edit- from Hunger Pangs: True Love Bites
310 notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 13 hours
Text
What I'm learning from this post is some of you REALLY need to go get your sewing machines serviced
ⓘ A sewing machine is a device that provides a several-fold increase of the speed at which you can make mistakes
13K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 18 hours
Text
Of course, when people say "Nobody would say [this] about a different group!" they're basically always wrong. People say roughly equivalent fucked up shit about most minorities.
Usually what people mean is "The specific people saying this would realize that it was fucked up if it were about a different group."
201 notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 2 days
Text
The thing neurotypicals tend not to understand about the ADHD brain is that it really only has two gears
I turn to the chalkboard and carefully write out
WORKIN' HARD
HARDLY WORKIN'
26K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 2 days
Text
Full offense and pun fully intended, but I genuinely think the very existence of "dead dove, do not eat" was a fucking canary in the mines, and no one really paid attention.
Because the tag itself was created as a response to a fandom-wide tendency to disregard warnings and assume tagging was exaggerated. And then the same fucking idiots reading those tags describing things they found upsetting or disturbing or just not to their taste would STILL click into the stories and give the writer's grief about it.
And as a response writers began using the tag to signal "no, really, I MEAN the tags!"
But like.
If you really think about it, that's a solution to a different problem. The solution to "I know you tagged your story appropriately but I chose to disregard the tags and warnings by reading it anyway, even though I knew it would upset me, so now I'm upset and making it your problem" is frankly a block, a ban and wide-spread blacklisting. But fandom as a whole is fucking awful at handling bad faith, insidious arguments that appeal to community inclusion and weaponize the fact most people participating in fandom want to share the space with others, as opposed to hurting people.
So instead of upfront ridiculing this kind of maladaptive attempt to foster one's own emotional self-regulation onto random strangers on the internet, fandom compromised and came up with a redundant tag in a good faith attempt to address an imaginary nuance.
There is no nuance to this.
A writer's job is to tag their work correctly. It's not to tag it exhaustively. It's not even to tag it extensively. A writer's sole obligation, as far as AO3 and arguably fandom spaces are concerned, is to make damn sure that the tags they put on their story actually match whatever is going on in that story.
That's it.
That's all.
"But what if I don't want to read X?" Well, you don't read fic that's tagged X.
"But what if I read something that wasn't tagged X?" Well, that's very unfortunate for you, but if it is genuinely that upsetting, you have a responsibility to yourself to only browse things explicitly tagged to not include X.
"But that's not a lot of fic!" Hi, you must be new here, yes, welcome to fandom. Most of our spaces are built explicitly as a reaction to There's Not Enough Of The Thing I Want, both in canon and fandom.
"But there are things on the internet that I don't like!" Yeah, and they are also out there, offline. And, here's the thing, things existing even though we personally dislike or even hate or even flat out find offensive/gross/immoral/unspeakable existing is the price we pay to secure our right to exist as individuals and creators, regardless of who finds US personally unpleasant, hateful or flat out offensive/gross/immoral/unspeakable.
"But what about [illegal thing]?!" So the thing itself is illegal, because the thing itself has been deemed harmful. But your goddamn cop-poisoned authoritarian little heart needs to learn that sometimes things are illegal that aren't harmful, and defaulting to "but illegal!" is a surefire way to end up on the wrong side of the fascism pop quiz. You're not a figure of authority and the more you demand to control and exercise authority by command, rather than leadership, the less impressive you seem. You know how you make actual, genuine change in a community? You center harm and argue in good faith to find accommodations and spread awareness of real, actual problems.
But let's play your game. Let's pretend we're all brainwashed cop-abiding little cogs that do not own a single working brain cell to exercise critical thinking with. 99% of the time, when you cry about any given thing "being illegal!!!" you're correct only so far as the THING itself being illegal. The act or object is illegal. Depiction of it is not. You know why, dipshit? Because if depiction of the thing were illegal, you wouldn't be able to talk about it. You wouldn't be able to educate about it. You wouldn't be able to reexamine and discuss and understand the thing, how and why and where it happens and how to prevent it. And yeah, depiction being legal opens the door for people to make depictions that are in bad taste or probably not appropriate. Sure. But that's the price we pay, creating tools to demystify some of the most horrific things in the world and support the people who've survived them. The net good of those tools existing outweighs the harm of people misusing them.
"You're defending the indefensible!" No, you're clumsily stumbling into a conversation that's been going on for centuries, with your elementary school understanding of morality and your bone-deep police state rot filtering your perception of reality, and insisting you figured it out and everyone else at the table is an idiot for not agreeing with you. Shut the fuck up, sit the fuck down and read a goddamn book.
13K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 2 days
Text
the concept of fatphobia isn't "skinny people have never ever been shamed or insecure about their bodies ever" but rather "society literally doesn't want fat people to exist at any cost to the point healthcare systems are willing to let fat people die rather than address any other possible medical issue, in addition to facing insults and disgust at every turn socially". online the fact u can't make a body positive or even neutral post without somebody going "but what about us naturally skinny and petite people" is so fucked man
37K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 3 days
Text
I know this is a tiny part of the wider problems born of diet culture, fatphobia, classicism, and racism but like god the idea that "healthy" food must inherently taste bad has completely ruined us as a society.
65K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 3 days
Text
ⓘ A sewing machine is a device that provides a several-fold increase of the speed at which you can make mistakes
13K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 3 days
Text
No in between. Reblog if you vote pleas
23K notes · View notes
myriad-rainbows · 4 days
Text
I am looking neither respectfully nor disrespectfully. I gaze without recognition of your form, and without understanding.
181K notes · View notes