palezineturkeydonkey

[palezineturkeydonkey]

Something interesting about the way progressive people use dog whistles. The idea of them, from the name, is they are hidden and heard only by a select group. When conservatives use them they will not explain what the symbolism behind them is unless they are sure you are already on their side, they may even gaslight you on making the gesture/ having the symbol on them.

But when progressives have them they will tell you up front what they mean, because part of the point is protest and making you plight or identity known. If you ask someone with a watermelon pin on, they will tell you it is in support for Palestine, someone who has a balaclava pepe pin is not going to give you a straight answer.

So when progressives and minorities are now in the USA needing to conceal the meanings of their dogwhistles and conservatives are making their gestures explicitly apparent; that's fucking scary.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

Lmao no, his ethnicity has nothing to do with the praise of his actions, if this was 50 years ago the Guardian would be calling him a pig wog detractor rather than a "privileged white". This is an utterly disgusting attempt to try and cause tension over civil progressivism to distract people from focusing on the greater class uproar.

This is the first time is an era where people are showing class solidarity with each other and recognising the utter bs in praising exploitive and hoarding billionaires. We can't let the media divide our solidarity against them.

Deny Defend Depose

[palezineturkeydonkey]

Um...

ohmigosh puki yyuo make music??? :O

No

[palezineturkeydonkey]

Yeah it was me, I made the Cool S sword.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

[palezineturkeydonkey]

I have just come across a most egregious website

"https://www.justhorseriders.co.uk/" is not a good source for equestrian information.

Its pages are riddled with poor writing, articles imitate quirky blogs whilst attempting to convey useful information, often information is repeated, nonsensical, unexplained or wrong. I strongly believe the entire site was written by chatGPT.

Not only that, the pages are infested with these AI images;

This is most horrendous when talking about equine health, these images poorly imitating diagrams are purely unhelpful and potentially harmful (Though I doubt someone could even believe any of them to be accurate) misinformation.

It seems that all of this is for money, click on any image on an article and you're sent to the store page. Most of these include, at the bottom, a section where the website answers what it deems common questions about the sort of product they are selling. You can find questions such as:

- What are horse riding socks for? -Are riding socks necessary? -Why do horse riders wear long socks? -Do you need long socks for horse riding? -Do you wear socks with riding boots?

The site seems to act like a retailer but I have a sneaking suspicion that it's freebooting. For instance, I looked at their Brogini boots, they are on this site half or a quarter the price you could find on Amazon or Brogini's own website.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

TL;DR dirt and mud people need to have healthy communication rather than nonverbal ending of actions when dating each other.

I hate that thing some people do where it's like. "I left my wallet on the table to see if you'd say anything" or "I wanted to see if you'd wash the car if I stopped doing it"

Cause like

I dont know about anyone else

But I am perpetually hovering three inches above the strong subconscious belief that everyone knows what they're doing at all times except me, so if you change your normal patterns and I notice, then I will assume it is an intentional choice with a thought-out plan behind it and I will avoid interfering

And if I don't notice, because I won't, because why would I, because not much bothers me and if you don't say anything to indicate you are bothered then how would I KNOW

[palezineturkeydonkey]

[palezineturkeydonkey]

Hey remember when US and Russia was all like “We’re the best!!! We’ve won the space race!!!!” But India sent a kick-ass space probe to Mars and the whole mission was fuel efficient, costed less and a roaring success in the first try and then they were like “…..wait no that can’t be true” and still have the audacity to call us “underdeveloped” or only view us as a ‘third world country’? :)

For anyone who needs more info, the probe was called Mangalyaan (which literally means space probe vehicle) or Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) and you can also get more information here and here

[palezineturkeydonkey]

Something I've notice some other men do when criticising women is frame in regards to attractiveness, i.e. "Being grumpy isn't attractive", "Most guys aren't into racists", "Your arrogance isn't pretty". Like even when they have valid criticism of someone's behaviour they have to frame it around their own attraction.

I've seen women be more straightforward with their criticisms though they seem to expect people to inherently already know what they are criticising them about. But they never frame their criticisms of others through the same lens of attractiveness.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

I just want to know what does my country's government think people's names are? Why do the example names given when filling out the form to check electoral enrolment extrapolate "John-Andronicus Cizitan". I need to know who has a name like that.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

I admire how, unlike other internet celebrities, your fans' toxicity is directed at you and not to the general public. Truly the opposite of swifties

Kinda like a self-eating snake. These fuckers want my blood.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

3:32am

Fellas it’s that time of day again

[palezineturkeydonkey]

[palezineturkeydonkey]

So yeah, make the options fair and have a system that allows for the ability of neither of those two candidates entering office over the 4/5 candidates who seem better. A preferential system should stop the two party bullshit when it comes time to vote for you guys.

[palezineturkeydonkey]

This is very fair a point, however isn't that centrist candidate compromise the best option when the opposition is a bigoted tyrant? Why are we making it so that there is no progressive option? Why isn't the system in the USA preferential, the whole idea of 'you're throwing away your vote' on candidates outside of the main two oppositions is constructed from the 'first-past-the-post' that's in use. With that context of not being able to select which candidates you don't prefer it makes the liberals in this situation somewhat correct.

USA citizens aren't given the option to truly democratic select who they do or do not want and are made to vote for the candidate they gamble will be a popular vote in order to vote for the candidates they wish would not get in office. Leftists have to choose between either a liberal centrist that has proven to be too senile to be effective while being expected to be the most popular left leaning vote, one of three progressive capable candidates who are seen to be a waste of vote. You do not get to contribute in a insightful choice. So either leftists need to vote for said the lesser of two evils as a compromise, or the USA fucking reforms its electoral system under threat of revolution. Many liberals aren't criticising their candidate for the poor things they do because the alternative would be worse. There needs to reform to their electoral system, and a preferential one will force the Democratic party to stop hiding behind 'well the only other alternative is much worse' excuse when there is criticism of their candidate.