quadgod

[quadgod]

Psychoamo Satanism

Psychoamo satanism is an alternative to xenosatanism that removes problem elements. Psycho meaning weird, amo meaning love. The symbol is ♡.ᐣ ⛧⃝

It was coined, conceptualised, and named by Bluesky user @/2kyute4u.bsky.social. I've done my best to represent it as close to her original definition as possible

Stances (Everything stated only applies to good faith, consensual activities and intent)

Psychoamo satanism is in support of:

Paraphilias, anyone with paraphilic attraction (including those who want to recover and those who don't), and the support, acceptance, and education that's needed for them

TransID/transX, including transition

Consanguinamory

Fiction, ship, and com/darkship

All LGBTQIA+, MOGAI, and contradictory labels

All forms of alterhuman, nonhuman, and otherkin; advocating for correct education on the alterhuman experience, as well as providing support and understanding for those misusing labels and helping to find the correct label for them

All system origins, all forms of plurality, all forms of multimindedness

Bodily autonomy, including any and all body modification/physical change as long as consent is provided

Self diagnosis

Pro consensual forms of: abuse, transharmful/transharmed torture, and any para excluding anything coerced/non consensual

Consent

Psychoamo satanism is neither encouraging nor against:

Support for those who choose to: lie about unimportant details online, conceal personal information, avoid "necessary" discourse, or separate their online lie entirely from their real life

The concept of paras, alterhumanity, transid, and systems being included in the queer community

All consensual relationships (including those deemed odd, e.g. age gap)

Disassembling the social constructs of gender and race in support of true equality

Any contact stances, with the intention of understanding and accepting different perspectives

Psychoamo satanism is against:

The study safe and law safe stances

Harassment

Exclusionism

Nazis

TERFs

The idea that you can recover from paras, while still providing support for those with those beliefs

Ageism

Misogyny and misandry

Racism

Abelism

Homo/transphobia

[quadgod]

Yes

[quadgod]

"okay but hypothetically, if we lived in a world without true morality-" "we do" "yes but hypothetically if we lived in a world without true morality-" "we literally already do"

i've been thinking lately about how morality isn't real but every time i try brining it up to someone they go "but... i have morals... so they must be real" MY GOD. "but... you just said you have morals, so why are you saying they aren't real?"

how can they not grasp it 😭😭 regardless of what anyone thinks about their personal, purely internal idea of morality, objective morality doesn't exist. we can only project our morality headcanons onto life and do our best

anyway nobody can even begin to imagine what "objective morality" would be without falling back on their own beliefs. "value autonomy" and "don't negatively impact others" are still arbitrary. why are you the individual that gets the cosmic right to create a concept that cannot exist

[quadgod]

i've been thinking lately about how morality isn't real but every time i try brining it up to someone they go "but... i have morals... so they must be real" MY GOD. "but... you just said you have morals, so why are you saying they aren't real?"

how can they not grasp it 😭😭 regardless of what anyone thinks about their personal, purely internal idea of morality, objective morality doesn't exist. we can only project our morality headcanons onto life and do our best

anyway nobody can even begin to imagine what "objective morality" would be without falling back on their own beliefs. "value autonomy" and "don't negatively impact others" are still arbitrary. why are you the individual that gets the cosmic right to create a concept that cannot exist

[quadgod]

if i had to pinpoint the difference between transid and kin, transid would be "i am this thing because it's what i am", and kin would be "i am this thing because i have it's soul"

it's a bit more of an abstract, nuanced feeling. discovering a kintype feels like discovering an alternate version of yourself, whereas discovering you're trans feels more like discovering who you are in the present; who's skin you're in

[quadgod]

i saw someone talking about how shitty it was that people were using japanese names when they weren't japanese. i was about to roll my eyes but then they started talking about how most non-japanese people often don't bother learning how to pronounce the names they use. for example pronouncing "shin" like the body part

i used to disagree that using cultural names was appropriative but if you're going to use them, make sure you actually understand how they're pronounced, instead of twisting them for your personal convenience. that's the textbook definition of appropriation

even if appropriation discourse is often nonsense and often very hateful towards transethnic people, sometimes there are good points floating around and it's very important we give them the time of day as well. we shouldn't favour one marginalised group over another in our advocacy

[quadgod]

[quadgod]

[quadgod]

i'm always ticked off when people say stuff like "transkids (read: chronoadult transminors) shouldn't have sex" because you'll be like "well actually, you shouldn't restrict people from having sex provided they're actually able to consent. besides, it's really up to the individual to decide whether or not they'd like to be kept from it for affirmation of their identity personally. some might do it FOR identity affirmation, some might for kink, and some might just dislike the idea of losing out on something they enjoy just because of transition. at the end of the day pushing for just one standard across every transkid is kind of invalidating for many and only makes sense through the lens of your personal preference. as people that champion personal autonomy and ability to identify however you like it's important we recognise that not everyone likes the same things in regards to their identity :)" and they always follow it up with "so you think chronological age matters MORE than intra age?"

NO? like it seems to me like this discourse comes from a miscommunication. "prioritise chronology in contact discourse" is just shorthand for "if someone can consent they should be allowed to have sex." chronolgy based contact discourse also excludes chronominor adults from having sex with chronoadults, whereas age based contact discourse doesn't say that plainly. imo chronolgy based contact discourse is just safer in terms of being more explicit in what it stands for, and being more inclusive of transkids that consider sex a part of their life. it's just like, don't exclude people when you don't have to

[quadgod]

BEHOLD!!!! Saul Goodman wearing another hideous suit.

[quadgod]

reminders:

allos can experience nonrose attraction

allos can be in nonrose relationships

queerplatonic relationships aren't the only kind of nonrose relationship

queerplatonic attraction and platonic attraction aren't the only kinds of nonrose attraction

if you're coining a nonrose attraction, consider what a relationship for that type of attraction entails

sincerely, an alloace who never sees these things talked about.

[quadgod]

Saul Goodman at your service!

[quadgod]

Hi MOGAI community. Let's talk about racism.

I'm racist. You're racist. Everyone is racist. Don't panic. We can work through this. Take a moment to sit with that. How does that feel, to be told that you are racist? Think about it for a moment. Try to look back and remember something you have said or done that was racist, intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly.

Can't think of anything? You've never done anything racist and you never will do anything racist? There, that's your racist action, that you claimed that you have never and will never do anything racist. I'm not calling you evil. I'm not calling you a bad person. Don't start apologizing, don't start panicking. Take a moment and sit with that.

We are all products of deeply racist societies. No matter where you live, no matter your own race and ethnicity, no matter your own personal experiences, you have been, continue to be, and always will be shaped by constant and inescapeable racism around you. Racism has been taught to you while you were growing up, racism was reinforced to you in your classes, racism surrounds you in your workplace. Racism is at home in your home.

Recognizing this and accepting this is one of the most important steps that you can take towards anti-racism.

The word 'racist' does not describe a type of person. The word 'racist' describes an action or idea. If we begin to think of racists as some other kind of person, then we separate them from ourselves. When we separate them from ourselves, we deny our own capacity and willingness to be racist. When we deny our own capacity and willingness to be racist, we ignore it when people point out our own racism to us. We become more focused on the idea of, "I can't be racist, I've helped with all of these racial justice initiatives!", than on the idea of addressing racism in and around us. We become more focused on maintaining our own self-image as someone who isn't racist than on working towards anti-racist action.

A person who cannot consider that they may have done or may be doing something racist is not someone that people of colour are safe discussing racism around. A community where accusations of racism are considered more offensive than racism itself is a community that prioritizes the white status quo over the safety and wellbeing of people of colour.

I have done racist things. I will do racist things again. You have done racist things. You will do racist things again. Sit with this. Accept it. Only once you no longer panic at the idea of being racist can you take meaningful anti-racist action. Only once you no longer prioritize your own guilt and shame about performing racism can you begin to prioritize anti-racism.

If you want to know more about the subject, then I can highly recommend White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo. I still have yet to read through the entire book, but I have here a link to the introduction and first chapter of it. It's short, only 14 pages, but wonderfully written and it explains a lot, and while I'm not an expert on the subject of anti-racism I would consider it essential reading for anyone who wishes to dip their toes into the topic for the first time. https://mega.nz/file/uCYSHagT#fVcJ7U_9qX_gtKZiY_-YHMfUzxt0OwOGaKPXeCZrYtI

Some tags for reach. @io-archival @rwuffles @daybreakthing @rabidbatboy @whimes

[quadgod]

ASASKFDSJJFKAASSADJFAHFDSHKFJSDAHAHHAFSHFKJSLDJ I CAN'T BELIEVE I GOT THIS URL. ILIA I LOVE YOU