shadycomputerpolice

[shadycomputerpolice]

People are really surprised about that man that proposed to the AI Chat Girlfriend but incel men have been saying for years that when sex bots learn to cook they will done with women. I guess they figured they don't have to wait for the cooking part as they can order food.

[shadycomputerpolice]

It is not possible to have empathy for pro patriarchy women without dismissing their victims.

Behind every misogynist is a girlfriend/wife and/or mother who is okay with it.

[shadycomputerpolice]

Sigh, the lesphobia and inaccurate assumption that all seperatists are lesbians is so 2020.

The issue has never been women dating men the issue has always been women dating men are still expecting to rely on the labour and resources of women who choose not to.

These posts should serve as proof for true separatists to stop caping and labouring for male worshippers because of their superiority complex and lack of reciprocation. They will not do the same for you.

I really appreciate your response to the post victim blaming straight women. I was astonished when wanting a life partner was compared to "hitting a hornet's nest". That's like. Not remotely the same thing. Or calling a desire for a partner simple "socialization". No. It's an *instinct* that most people have. And romantic love can be an absolutely incredible and lovely experience. Some of the most beautiful experiences of my life involved romance. Saying that forgoing it is a simple and easy thing and you're just stupid if you don't is massively simplistic. I especially hate this when it comes from lesbians. You're asking straight women to give up something amazing that you aren't at all expected to give up. It is indeed true that most men are terrible and getting into a relationship with them is a big risk, because repeatedly men have shown that they have the ability to be deceptive about the truth of who they are until marriage and/or children have tied their female partner to them. But that doesn't somehow make straight women simply stupid or pathetic for getting into relationships with men. It makes them human beings with human desires. I'm lucky enough to be bisexual, so I'm not inherently going to be deprived of romantic love if I want to keep myself safe from men. But I have fallen in love with men before. Not because I went on dating sites looking for them--I actually select only looking for women on them--but because I've met men at work and school, and fallen for them. Resisting the urge to act upon those desires is massively difficult if not impossible. It's not going out of your way to kick a hornet's nest. It's trying to ignore the call of something primal and potentially beautiful. Sneering at straight women is unempathetic and disgusting, and I would expect better from women who purport to be feminists.

It's because those "feminists" are just lesbians with a superiority complex.

I am also fortunately bisexual, honestly I'm finding that the only people I can trust to be Normal about women is bisexual women.

What makes it even funnier is if you DON'T think straight women are helpless dumb dick addicts swatting at a hornet's nest, you MUST support dating men. Like. No I have a whole ass tag of reasons to never date men, because based on the data it is my belief that it is not beneficial to women. But I do not view women as inherently lesser for giving in to biology.

[shadycomputerpolice]

A woman not wearing makeup on her wedding should not trigger any but especially that much criticism.

No matter which angle you look at it from, the anger and criticism was irrational and illogical. You had multiple women screaming crying and throwing up because a woman didn't wear makeup on her own wedding day. Why do they think any of that was appropriate?

When men comment on women's appearance, women rightfully tell them to shut up and mind their business. But somehow women think that doesn't apply to them because they are women. Well it does.

[shadycomputerpolice]

Me a black woman who hasn't worn makeup in years, tilting my head to the side and squinting while trying to make sense of what she is saying.

Conclusion, the take is trash, I am talking radioactive biohazardous trash. Makes no sense.

This is this absolute craziest take I have ever heard... In 2025, women cannot go barefaced because it invalidates trans women's existences. And because of that for some reason, Black women aren't real women; they're men!

[shadycomputerpolice]

The creator below is someone I usually agree with when it comes to Capitalism and Racism but this time, I strongly disagree. She like many other public feminists is pro trans ideology but I just chalked it up to her wanting to maintain her following and make money online but turns out she also has fucked up ideas about feminism.

Firstly, how is stating an objective observation antifeminist? How is it anti woman to state facts? Some mothers just want to make childfree people especially the women their oppressors for whatever reason because the jump to the antifeminist conclusion is irrational.

And when you ask them how they are being oppressed by childfree women, it is always something petty and inconsequential like the "21 and childfree" trend or a person not doing free labour for them. They can't give any concrete examples of systemic or even interpersonal oppression. Oppression is about using power to deny people their human rights and other legal rights. Just because someone hurts your feelings doesn't mean they are oppressing you.

Secondly, whenever talk about how feminism should be centred around motherhood, I always ask how that will benefit childfree women and no one has given a convincing answer. It is always some heal the world, kumbaya response. No tangible reason given. The kumbaya argument is fine and is convincing enough for some childfree feminists but it isn't enough for many.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by JULIA CHA | Business & Leadership (@juliajcha)

[shadycomputerpolice]

This is how pro sex work progressives sound

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Ur Daddy (@fatherfannie)

[shadycomputerpolice]

The concept of Reactive Abuse is so going to come back to bite women in the ass and many feminists championing this idea do not see it.

[shadycomputerpolice]

So that alleged story of a young lady who lost a well paying job because she was apparently participating in the Office Siren Trend made its way to my office. The story goes she wore a leather mini skirt and a tube top and was let go because of a dress code violation. If the story is true, I say "Corporate Darwin Awards" and simply shrug my shoulders.

However, some women are really going into discourse and analysis mode over the situation. Ofc you have the usual "women should wear what they want" slogan. Someone took the idea of women's human rights not being determined by their clothing styles turned it to women can wear what they want but the truth is nobody is allowed to wear what they want to an office. You can wear what you want within the prescribed guidelines but you cannot wear whatever you want.

Also, "if it was a man ..." doesn't work here because corporate dress codes also affect men and show me the precedent of a man wearing a mini skirt and tube top or equivalent and not getting fired. Discriminatory institutional policies do exist but this is not one of them.

Pop feminism doesn't care about women's wellbeing, they care talking points. Now, some of them might champion your cause for a hot minute but eventually they will move on but the one left unemployed is you. And your unemployment is not helping to fight for female liberation.

[shadycomputerpolice]

So grimes doesn't win apartheid Clyde's next top concubine and I'm supposed to feel sorry for her, I DON'T

[shadycomputerpolice]

I never fell for the "no woman is free until all women are free" or "if some women are for sale, then all women are for sale".

First the reality is if some women are for sale, then all women are for bargain because men being men are going to try some shit. However whether or not a woman sells herself is up to her [not talking about victims of trafficking here].

As for the freedom part, legislative wise/policy wise, yes, women's freedom are tied to other women's because that is how laws work but on an interpersonal level, a woman's freedom is not tied to other women's.

Do not believe that radfem slogan. You are your own person.

No offense but we all know that mikey madison and everyone in her likeness is just a whore and that women like that shouldnt have any kind of opportunities whatsoever, let alone to win a fucking oscar. Why are young women even entering that depraved industry when the whole planet knows that you have to suck and fuck your way through it to get anywhere? Everyone knows that all actors, models and singers are prostitutes, why do the viewers not boycott this shit? If you really must watch it then at the very least do not pay money for it. Hollywood is the biggest propaganda machine on the planet but all that feminists have to say to films like anora is, 'Well its mens fault that we are forced to be have plastic surgery, be a prostitute, degrade ourselves in xyz manner'. It has got completely pathetic now. Call a spade a spade: women who whore themselves out need to be renounced if not punished.

[shadycomputerpolice]

Some of you all's insistence on being in solidarity with racist and homophobic women is the reason that there will never be female solidarity. And it is one of the reasons why black women had to come up with a whole other movement called "Womanism" to get away from your racists and racist coddling selves.

I know part of racism is ignoring the oppressed's humanity but do you guys ever stop to consider how the black and other non white women feel seeing you guys leap to the defense of racist women then turn around and call for female solidarity. Do you ever wonder how that negatively impacts our trust in you?

Wait, let me guess, the expectation is for us to stop "victim blaminh" and stop being narrow minded and focus on the bigger picture of fighting the patriarchy. When we do not follow along, you criticise us for not being for women but where is the condemnation for the racist? You guys do not do that because that will be "victim blaming" never mind that women of colour are victim of racism that sometimes comes from other women.

Yes, Women do not have to be perfect to be deserving of their human rights but women do infact have to be non racist to get the support of women of colour.

It is very important to note, Elon Musk is the one denying Grimes her human rights not the women criticising her on social media. If you want support her, do so but do not criticise other feminists who decide to sit this one out because she is objectively a horrible human being. ( BTW I don't how making posts on social media platforms counts as support and is going to help her in her legal battles against an actual billionaire but sure).

Literally hope grimes is crying herself to sleep for real

[shadycomputerpolice]

10000% agree with the message but Sidenote: @blackpilljesus are you Nigerian?

Maturing is realising that women aren't that much better than maIes - they just lack power because when they have power they're also violent & abusive.

For example women who treat service workers like crap because they wont face consequences, women who pimp out their daughters to predators online, women who set up other women to be raped by moids, women who mock other victims of maIe violence + side with their abusers, racist women, female bosses that abuse their power to bully female subordinates, women that are physically violent to smaller women & girls, groups of women & girls ganging up to bully a woman or girl, those aunties (if you're a woc you'll know what I'm talking about) that wouldn't try that attitude to boys or white people, etc I'm sure y'all know.

There is no solidarity between women because women as a collective have no power. There's no interest to the average woman to defend another woman to the end because they dont see much benefit from it. Women are nicer to maIes even when they dont want to be not because women have endless empathy but because they lack power, if more women could physically rock moids shit they would do it.

Also, many women are sellouts and will be quick to throw other women under the bus for crumbs of power so you can't blindly trust women because they're women. They would be quiet on moids dirty laundry but a woman makes a small mistake and they become town crier.

Now i'm not exonerating moids of their evil but telling women (y'all) to look out because as it'll be more effort for women to fight against maIes, you will be a target if they perceive you as weak/easier to overpower. Usually when these topics are brought up it's a disingenuous attempt to pretend maIes are in danger because of women to detract from the conversation about maIe violence. However, as a woman it's important to be aware of how other women are threats especially if you're marginalised because if you try this feminist kumbaya shit in real life you're going to be burned. If other women sense weakness from you they will exploit it & you will be a target even if you dont provoke them. I dont care for a backstory overall for their actions; point is they are also a threat to be watched out for.

Also the fact that women turn their aggression to the powerless instead of those that generally hurt them should say it all. This is not an attack on women. The comparison is not between maIes & women behavior per se, it is about how women treat maIes & females. It's a hard pill to take down but it's essential for your survival to do so. This notion that of women being inherently good is something that gets exploited by sex traffickers (many of whom are women). Yes maIes are generally dangerous & in the end I'd rather physically take my chances dealing with an antagonistic woman than maIe but don't assume womens innocence either.

I stopped feeling bad for many women when I realised this. Women dont have better morals, women will gladly use others without a second thought to advance themselves, they'll happily punch down on others to secure what little status they have in society. They'll use the power they have to make other women & girls lives hell. I'm not saying women have to be overly empathetic, perfect or innocent to acknowledge how messed up misogyny is. In the end women are human too & most some humans suck. But it's misleading & dangerous pushing the narrative that women are these overly empathetic angels who do no wrong unless "influenced", when they are not that. Long story short, personally watch your backs and assess women on a case by case basis.

Edit: On the human side of things, this behaviour isn't just limited to women. Several marginalised people are this way including maIes which is something that made me stop caring about activism. Most people dont care about inequality, they care about being on top of the unequal hierarchy. There's a belief on the left that marginalised people = more moral and that's far from the truth. In nigeria people are usually harsh to their workers & poor people, at first I didn't understand why but when you're nice to them or help them out they see you as an idiot & screw you over with whatever advantage they have. This isn't to say don't help, but just be wary of others even if they seem less privileged.

[shadycomputerpolice]

Maturing is realising that women aren't that much better than maIes - they just lack power because when they have power they're also violent & abusive.

For example women who treat service workers like crap because they wont face consequences, women who pimp out their daughters to predators online, women who set up other women to be raped by moids, women who mock other victims of maIe violence + side with their abusers, racist women, female bosses that abuse their power to bully female subordinates, women that are physically violent to smaller women & girls, groups of women & girls ganging up to bully a woman or girl, those aunties (if you're a woc you'll know what I'm talking about) that wouldn't try that attitude to boys or white people, etc I'm sure y'all know.

There is no solidarity between women because women as a collective have no power. There's no interest to the average woman to defend another woman to the end because they dont see much benefit from it. Women are nicer to maIes even when they dont want to be not because women have endless empathy but because they lack power, if more women could physically rock moids shit they would do it.

Also, many women are sellouts and will be quick to throw other women under the bus for crumbs of power so you can't blindly trust women because they're women. They would be quiet on moids dirty laundry but a woman makes a small mistake and they become town crier.

Now i'm not exonerating moids of their evil but telling women (y'all) to look out because as it'll be more effort for women to fight against maIes, you will be a target if they perceive you as weak/easier to overpower. Usually when these topics are brought up it's a disingenuous attempt to pretend maIes are in danger because of women to detract from the conversation about maIe violence. However, as a woman it's important to be aware of how other women are threats especially if you're marginalised because if you try this feminist kumbaya shit in real life you're going to be burned. If other women sense weakness from you they will exploit it & you will be a target even if you dont provoke them. I dont care for a backstory overall for their actions; point is they are also a threat to be watched out for.

Also the fact that women turn their aggression to the powerless instead of those that generally hurt them should say it all. This is not an attack on women. The comparison is not between maIes & women behavior per se, it is about how women treat maIes & females. It's a hard pill to take down but it's essential for your survival to do so. This notion that of women being inherently good is something that gets exploited by sex traffickers (many of whom are women). Yes maIes are generally dangerous & in the end I'd rather physically take my chances dealing with an antagonistic woman than maIe but don't assume womens innocence either.

I stopped feeling bad for many women when I realised this. Women dont have better morals, women will gladly use others without a second thought to advance themselves, they'll happily punch down on others to secure what little status they have in society. They'll use the power they have to make other women & girls lives hell. I'm not saying women have to be overly empathetic, perfect or innocent to acknowledge how messed up misogyny is. In the end women are human too & most some humans suck. But it's misleading & dangerous pushing the narrative that women are these overly empathetic angels who do no wrong unless "influenced", when they are not that. Long story short, personally watch your backs and assess women on a case by case basis.

Edit: On the human side of things, this behaviour isn't just limited to women. Several marginalised people are this way including maIes which is something that made me stop caring about activism. Most people dont care about inequality, they care about being on top of the unequal hierarchy. There's a belief on the left that marginalised people = more moral and that's far from the truth. In nigeria people are usually harsh to their workers & poor people, at first I didn't understand why but when you're nice to them or help them out they see you as an idiot & screw you over with whatever advantage they have. This isn't to say don't help, but just be wary of others even if they seem less privileged.

[shadycomputerpolice]

SAHMs and working women are not on the same team. If SAHMs receive government welfare, it is working women in male-dominated fields that will get the shortest end of the stick. Career-oriented women who do their own chores already have to compete in the workplace with men that get pampered by their wives. On top of that their income tax will end up paying for something that works against their favor. It’s very telling who the pro SAHM welfare ‘feminists’ on this app want to sacrifice for their cause. 

[shadycomputerpolice]

Women who engage in the cult of beauty always insult women who don't partake and accuse them of being jealous of "beautiful" women but my thing are you really beautiful if you have to spend that much time and money to look the way you do?

You are something, maybe attractive, put together, flashy or some other adjective but definitely not beautiful.

Let us not even talk about some of their night and day differences with and without makeup. Some of you are unrecognisable without the prosthetic level makeup that you regularly wear to be "beautiful" and you think you somebody is jealous of how you look. GTFOH

Women who don't partake in beauty are not dumb and naive and some of us are going to insult you back when you insult us and then you come online and post "ugly women are jealous of me because I am beautiful" posts.

Let us even highlight that some of them blame all of their life problems on women being jealous of them. I am NOT saying destructive female jealousy doesn't exist but is that always the case? All your negative interactions are caused by jealousy? How about you stop insulting women and see how they treat you? You cannot insult people and expect them not to retaliate.

[shadycomputerpolice]

I was never here for the glorification of Gisele because I knew that there was no way she didn't know that man was a sexual deviant.

Yes, that disgusting excuse of a human being should be executed or, at the very least, imprisoned for life BUT that level of sexual degeneracy cannot be hidden. She knew he was a sexual deviant what she didn't believe was that he would harm her. She was fine as long as she wasn't at the receiving end of his bad behaviour.

I have empathy for her as a victim of a disgusting crime but a Nobel Prize, GTFOH.

I know some feminists are going to say I am holding women to higher standards than men... Yes, the fuck I am. Yes, I expect women not to stay married to creeps.

Is there a source for the claim that she was aware of her husband's compulsion, taking upskirt pictures and such and him abusing their children? What she experienced was so degrading and evil, and I have respect for her strength in going public with it. Yet, if it’s true that she looked the other way while her husband harmed other women before, I wonder: what if she hadn’t been the one to suffer those rapes for 10 years, but another woman? and her husband was one of the 50 men to rape that woman?

This article is in French but it says that "in 2010, the year he moved to Mazan with his wife Gisèle, Dominique Pelicot had already had a run-in with the police, as revealed by Midi Libre. Aged 57, he was arrested in July in a shopping centre in Seine-et-Marne, caught filming under the skirts of customers with a miniature camera hidden in a pen."

I know this is a Twitter thread, but this is from a journalist who documented nearly all that was said during the trial in October.

In this series of tweets we're made aware Dominique Pélicot's son thought there were very few boundaries between him and his parents, and it's been reported Dominique and Gisèle had sex in their front of their children several times.

Other family members (including grandkids and Gisèle's own daughter) said he masturbated in public sometimes but she looked the other way.