Tumgik
#2018 Bhima Koregaon violence
indizombie · 1 year
Quote
We've reached finally at the position of an unamended constitution which is actually amended in practise. Liberal democratic character of the Constitution has not been altered by amendments but, minorities are lynched, journalists are prosecuted or worse, killed. Lawyers are attacked for doing their professional duties, activists from civil society are thrown behind bars and the ED is unleashed against all. Then there is targeted prosecution for some and impunity for others. Abuse of criminal law has been raised to the level of a policy. You do not need a gun to be a terrorist. You can be thrown into jail for the thoughts in your mind. You, as a lawyer can argue a case in court and be thrown in jail...The legal profession is in danger. We all know what happened in the Delhi riots, Elgar Parishad and Bhima Koregaon cases; these cases represent the transformation of the victim into an accused in a Court of law by the use of UAPA.
Indira Jaising, senior advocate
12 notes · View notes
metamatar · 7 days
Note
have you read the incarcerations by alpa shah?
Its about Bhima Koregaon and its aftermath! I will read it, thank you. Blurb from Harper Collins –
The Incarcerations pulls back the curtain on Indian democracy to tell the remarkable and chilling story of the Bhima Koregaon case, in which 16 human rights defenders (the BK-16) – professors, lawyers, journalists, poets – have been imprisoned, without credible evidence and without trial, as Maoist terrorists.
Alpa Shah unravels how these alleged terrorists were charged with inciting violence at a year’s day commemoration in 2018, accused of waging a war against the Indian state, and plotting to kill the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. Expertly leading us through the case, Shah exposes some of the world’s most shocking revelations of cyber warfare research, which show not only hacking of emails and mobile phones of the BK-16, but also implantation of the electronic evidence that was used to incarcerate them. Through the life histories of the BK-16, Shah dives deep into the issues they fought for and tells the story of India’s three main minorities – Adivasi, Dalits and Muslims – and what the search for democracy entails for them.
21 notes · View notes
market-news-24 · 29 days
Text
Today's Current Affairs: A Tragic Saga of Human Rights Defenders Today's current affairs shed light on the harrowing tale of human rights defenders in India. The case of Gautam Navlakha, a renowned activist arrested without trial under the UAPA, showcases the grim reality faced by individuals fighting for justice. Similarly, the stories of Sudha Bharadwaj, Anand Teltumbde, and others highlight the challenges and injustices endured by those who dare to speak out against oppression. These narratives serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle for freedom and justice in the country. [ad_2] Download Latest Movies in HD Quality Downloading In 15 seconds Scroll Down to End of This Post const downloadBtn = document.getElementById('download-btn'); const timerBtn = document.getElementById('timer-btn'); const downloadLinkBtn = document.getElementById('download-link-btn'); downloadBtn.addEventListener('click', () => downloadBtn.style.display = 'none'; timerBtn.style.display = 'block'; let timeLeft = 15; const timerInterval = setInterval(() => if (timeLeft === 0) clearInterval(timerInterval); timerBtn.style.display = 'none'; downloadLinkBtn.style.display = 'inline-block'; // Add your download functionality here console.log('Download started!'); else timerBtn.textContent = `Downloading In $timeLeft seconds`; timeLeft--; , 1000); ); [ad_1] **What act was Gautam Navlakha arrested under?** - a) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - b) Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - c) Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 - d) National Security Act, 1980 Answer: a) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 **Which of the following activists passed away while in detention?** - a) Sudha Bharadwaj - b) Anand Teltumbde - c) Varavara Rao - d) Father Stan Swamy Answer: d) Father Stan Swamy **Which activist was a professor at Nagpur University?** - a) Surendra Gadling - b) Shoma Sen - c) Mahesh Raut - d) Vernon Gonsalves Answer: b) Shoma Sen **Who is known for championing Dalit rights and writing about the Indian caste system?** - a) Arun Ferreira - b) Ashok Teltumbde - c) Surendra Gadling - d) Sudha Bharadwaj Answer: a) Arun Ferreira [ad_2] Who is Gautam Navlakha? Gautam Navlakha is a Delhi-based activist-author who has been involved with the People’s Union for Democratic Rights. He has worked with publications like Economic and Political Weekly and NewsClick, criticizing repressive laws and militarism in regions like Kashmir and northeastern states. Why was Gautam Navlakha arrested? Gautam Navlakha was arrested on August 28, 2018, based on alleged evidence of being involved in inciting violence during the Bhima Koregaon rally on December 31, 2017. He was accused of being part of a conspiracy that led to caste violence. What legal battles did Gautam Navlakha face during his incarceration? Gautam Navlakha faced numerous legal battles during his incarceration, including appeals for bail on various grounds. The Bombay High Court granted him bail in December 2023, noting that there was no evidence to support the NIA's claim that he had committed a terrorist act under the UAPA. Who is Shoma Sen? Shoma Sen is an English professor and a Dalit and women’s rights activist. She was a professor at Nagpur University and was arrested on June 6, 2018, under various sections of the UAPA and the Indian Penal Code. What charges were leveled against Shoma Sen? Shoma Sen was accused of "waging war" against the government, inciting violence, having Maoist links, and fundraising for fugitives. She was suspended from her position at Nagpur University and spent time in Pune’s Yerwada Central Jail. Why was Mahesh Raut arrested? Mahesh Raut, a forest rights activist, was arrested on June 6, 2018, for allegedly spreading Maoist ideology, recruiting Maoists, and providing funds. He worked with Adivasi communities in the mining areas of Gadhchiroli.
[ad_1] Download Movies Now Searching for Latest movies 20 seconds Sorry There is No Latest movies link found due to technical error. Please Try Again Later. function claimAirdrop() document.getElementById('claim-button').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'block'; let countdownTimer = 20; const countdownInterval = setInterval(function() document.getElementById('countdown').textContent = countdownTimer; countdownTimer--; if (countdownTimer < 0) clearInterval(countdownInterval); document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('sorry-button').style.display = 'block'; , 1000); [ad_2] Today’s Current Affairs bring glimpses of the arduous journey of human rights defenders who have been fighting for justice and freedom. From Gautam Navlakha's recent release after four years of imprisonment to the ongoing legal battles of activists like Shoma Sen, Sudha Bharadwaj, Anand Teltumbde, and others, the struggle continues. The saga includes arrests, bail pleas, and court orders that highlight the challenges faced by those standing up against oppressive systems. The stories of these individuals reflect the resilience and determination to fight for justice despite the odds stacked against them. The legal battles and personal sacrifices of these activists serve as a stark reminder of the fight for human rights and democracy in today’s world. [ad_1]
0 notes
currenthunt · 4 months
Text
Law panel imposes heavy fine to tackle property damage
The 22nd Law Commission has recommended significant changes in the law to deal with damage to public property on February 2, 2024.The Law Commission has submitted its report titled "Review of the Law on Prevention of Damage to Public Property" to the Government of India.Keeping in mind the seriousness of the issue and the loss it would cause to the country's revenue, the Law Commission had taken suo motu cognizance of this issue.The report suggests measures ranging from tampering with evidence to imposing fines equal to the market value of damaged public property. Highlights of 284th report - People involved in damaging public property should get bail only after recovering an amount equal to the damage caused by them. - The Commission has recommended amendments in the 'Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984'. It also recommended making new laws to deal with 'intentional damage to public property' as follows - - by making a separate law - Or by amending the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - or the newly enacted Indian Judicial Code (BNS),Amend in 2023 The Commission has based its report on the following incidents - Muzaffarnagar riots of 2013 - Jat Reservation Movement of the year, 2015 - Patidar Reservation Movement of the year, 2016 - Bhima Koregaon protest of the year, 2018 - Anti-CAA movement of the year, 2018 - Agricultural Law Movement of the Year, 2020 - Violence spread after comments made on Prophet Mohammed in the year 2020 - Clashes in Manipur in the year 2023 Highlights of 285th report - The Commission recommended retaining the offense of criminal defamation. - Open speeches need to be balanced to protect individuals from malicious falsehoods, which cause irreparable damage to a person's reputation. - The matter was referred to the legal panel by the Law Ministry in August, 2017. - This panel upheld the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in 'Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India'. - In this decision, the Supreme Court had upheld the constitutionality of the offense of criminal defamation. - The Supreme Court had said that the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(2) of the Constitution is subject to certain reasonable restrictions. - The Indian Judicial Code has protected the interests of victims by making punishment for crime a matter of community service and has also reduced the scope for abuse by providing alternative punishment. 22nd Law Commission - The 22nd Law Commission was notified on February 24, 2020. - Its tenure was to end on February 20, 2023. - On 22 February 2023, its tenure was extended till 31 August 2024. - The Commission is headed by Justice Ruturaj Awasthi, retired Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. Law commission - The Law Commission is a non-statutory body. - It is constituted from time to time by the Government of India. - The first Law Commission was constituted in the year 1955 for a period of three years. - It works as an advisor to the Ministry of Law and Justice. - Its main function is legal research and review of existing laws in India. - Its report helps the central government in making new laws. - The Law Commission consists of a whole-time Chairman, one Member-Secretary and four whole-time members. - The number of part-time members cannot exceed five. - A retired judge of the Supreme Court or a retired Chief Justice of a High Court is the chairman of this commission. Read the full article
0 notes
wikipedia-edits · 1 year
Text
important wikipedia edits 4/14/23
Page on TV channel Nick Jr. vandalized, instances of "Nick" replaced with "dick"
"Relationship with Achilles" section of article on Patroclus vandalized, "they were clearly gay, and anyone who says otherwise is a liar" inserted after sentence about Achilles being the eromenos (this person also went back and added it again, twice, after it was removed, lol)
Article on the children's book series Diary of a Wimpy Kid vandalized, author Jeff Kinney referred to as "poo sexy manJeff Kinney," caption of page image changed to just "b"
Introduction for page on campsites changed from "a place used for camping" to "a place used for playing backwards compatible PS3"
"Hi there" added to file name of page image on article for the Sinks Canyon State Park
Introduction for football player Jason Fields changed from "an American football player born in 1999 to "he is so good at football and better than ArodAmerican football player born in 1999inlove this guy," Bears Camp replaced with "Camjdjdjrhehejenrnrnrnrpg," alt text of page image changed to "he has a list of his favorite cats"
"Fortnite balls" added repeatedly to page for Music of Chile
"Can I write anything here?" added to introduction of page on 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence
"He wrote the poem: hey banana church organ banana the car did a piddle" added to page on poet William Woodsworth
"Have a great day hope you used this resource well" added to page on the Tiny Home Movement
1 note · View note
Text
Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri's Unconditional Apology To Court Over Tweet
Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri’s Unconditional Apology To Court Over Tweet
New Delhi: Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri has submitted an unconditional apology to the Delhi High Court for his 2018 allegations that a judge was biased in granting relief to activist Gautam Navlakha in the Bhima Koregaon violence case.  The court had initiated contempt proceedings against Vivek Agnihotri, writer Anand Ranganathan, and news portal Swarajya after taking note of the remarks against…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
newslobster · 2 years
Text
Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri Apologises To Delhi High Court For 2018 Tweet On Judge
Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri Apologises To Delhi High Court For 2018 Tweet On Judge
New Delhi: Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri has submitted an unconditional apology to the Delhi High Court for his 2018 allegations that a judge was biased in granting relief to activist Gautam Navlakha in the Bhima Koregaon violence case.  The court had initiated contempt proceedings against Vivek Agnihotri, writer Anand Ranganathan, and news portal Swarajya after taking note of the remarks against…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
unpluggedtv · 2 years
Text
Rao's appeal for permanent bail based on medical need was scheduled for hearing on July 19 by a panel of Justices UU Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat, and Sudhanshu Dhulia.
0 notes
znewstech · 2 years
Text
Bhima Koregaon case: SC extends interim bail of Varavara Rao | India News
Bhima Koregaon case: SC extends interim bail of Varavara Rao | India News
SC extends interim bail of Varavara Rao. (File photo) NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended the interim bail granted on medical grounds to activist and poet Dr P Varavara Rao, an accused in the 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence case. A bench of Justices UU Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia posted Rao’s plea seeking permanent bail on medical grounds for a hearing on July 19.…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
studyiqeducation · 3 years
Link
0 notes
indizombie · 9 months
Text
The tragedy of this episode, like Bhima Koregaon and many of those politically incarcerated, is that the majority of Indians might still not be convinced of the case against the accused, but they want to believe. It is this culture that is secularised by the regime. We are witnessing how counterrevolution is created in the longer term. The weapon of emotion and belief is justified at the cost of questions, reason and temperament. The deficit of truth has become the adage of the nation. It further sinks into the trenches of madness wherein the promise of a nation is dwarfed.
Suraj Yengde, ‘Umar Khalid’s jail stint and the deficit of truth’, Indian Express
1 note · View note
sonita0526 · 4 years
Text
केंद्र ने 2 साल बाद एनआईए को जांच सौंपी, महाराष्ट्र सरकार बोली- फैसला संविधान के खिलाफ
केंद्र ने 2 साल बाद एनआईए को जांच सौंपी, महाराष्ट्र सरकार बोली- फैसला संविधान के खिलाफ
मुंबई. भीमा कोरेगांव में 1 जनवरी 2018 को हुई हिंसा से जुड़े सभी मामलों की जांचअब राष्ट्रीय जांच एजेंसी(एनआईए) करेगी। केंद्र सरकार के इस फैसले पर महाराष्ट्र केगृह मंत्री अनिल देशमुख ने कड़ीआपत्ति जताई है। उन्होंने कहा कि केंद्र ने राज्य सरकार की अनुमति के बिनामामले की जांच एनआईए को सौंप दी, यहसंविधान के खिलाफ है। पिछले दो साल से भीमा कोरेगांव से जुड़े सभीमामलों की जांच महाराष्ट्र पुलिस कर रही थी।
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Bhima Koregaon Case : Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Mahesh Raut A Critical Analysis of the Legal Issues Involved
Tumblr media
Background, Parties, and Judges Parties Involved in Bhima Koregaon Case The appellant in this case is Mahesh Sitaram Raut, and the respondents are the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the State of Maharashtra. Judges Presiding for Bhima Koregaon Case The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Sharmila U. Deshmukh. Factual Background The case pertains to the Bhima Koregaon Shaurya Din Prerana Abhiyan, an event organized on December 31, 2017. The event led to large-scale violence and the loss of one life. Mahesh Raut was accused of having links with the banned CPI(Maoist) organization and was arrested in 2018. “On 31.12.2017, Bhima Koregaon Shaurya Din Prerana Abhiyan, organised an event called ‘Elgaar Parishad’ in Shaniwarwada, Pune… There was large scale violence and one youth lost his life.” (Page 3, Paragraph 4) Legal Proceedings Culminating into Judgment Mahesh Raut was arrested in 2018 and charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. His bail application was rejected by the Special Judge (N.I.A.), City Civil & Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai, leading to this appeal. “Appellant filed an application for bail under Section 439 of CrPC before the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Pune, which was rejected by an Order dated 06.11.2019.” (Page 7, Paragraph 7) Controversy Involved and Relevant Provisions of Law The primary controversy revolves around whether Mahesh Raut was involved in a ‘terrorist act’ under Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Other sections invoked include Sections 16, 17, 18, 20, and 39 of the UAP Act. “Appellant has committed or indulge in a ‘terrorist act’ as contemplated under Section 15 of UAP Act.” (Page 20, Paragraph 12.1) Section 43D(5) of UAPA The Bombay High Court, in its judgment, specifically addressed the restrictive provisions of Section 43D(5) of the UAPA, which makes it difficult for an accused to secure bail if the court believes that the accusations are prima facie true. “The law relating to interpretation and application of Section 45-D(5) is well enunciated and crystallized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court by its various decisions.” (Page 13) “Under ordinary circumstances in a petition for bail, this exercise of analysis of evidence would not have been necessary. But in view of the restrictive provisions of Section 43D of the 1967 Act, some element of evidence-analysis becomes inevitable.” (Page 15, Paragraph 15) Section 43D(5) of the UAPA stipulates that no person accused of an offense punishable under Chapters IV and VI of the Act shall be released on bail if the court believes that the accusations against him are prima facie true. “Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code , no person accused of an offence punishable under Chapters IV and VI of this Act shall, if in custody, be released on bail or on his own bond unless the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release: Provided that such accused person shall not be released on bail or on his own bond if the Court, on a perusal of the case diary or the report made under section 173 is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against such person is prima facie true.” 1 Provisions Governing Bail Under UAPA The Hon’ble Supreme Court has laid down guidelines for granting bail under UAPA. The Court must consider whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against the accused are prima facie true. “Therefore, while deciding a bail petition filed by an accused against whom offences under Chapters IV and VI of the 1967 Act have been alleged, the Court has to consider whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against the accused is prima facie true.” (Page 14, Paragraph 14) Rival Submissions For the Appellant Senior Advocate Mihir Desai argued that Mahesh Raut was highly educated and had no corroborative evidence against him. He emphasized Raut’s social work and international exposure. For the Respondent The NIA opposed the bail, citing a larger conspiracy to wage war against the country. They relied on statements of witnesses and letters allegedly procured from hard drives. Important Observations of Court “cannot be said that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against the Appellant is prima-facie true to attract Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 39 of UAP Act.” (Page 21, Paragraph 15) Conclusion The Bombay High Court granted bail to Mahesh Raut, observing that the material against him could not lead to a prima facie inference of his involvement in a ‘terrorist act’ under the UAP Act. The Court also noted that Raut had already spent over five years in prison without trial, further strengthening his case for bail. “The Appellant is in pre-trial incarceration for more than five years and three months. There are no criminal antecedents at the discredit of   Appellant. Therefore in our opinion a case for grant of bail to the Appellant has been made out.” (Page 21, Paragraph 15.1) This judgment serves as a significant precedent, emphasizing the need for strong, corroborative evidence when invoking stringent laws like the UAP Act. 1: Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Read the full article
1 note · View note
newsupdatesbykiara · 2 years
Text
Koregaon-Bhima probe panel asks Pawar to appear before it on May 5 and 6
Tumblr media
The Koregaon-Bhima Inquiry Commission has directed NCP chief Sharad Pawar to appear before it on May 5 and 6 to record his statement in connection with the January 2018 violence at a war memorial in Pune district of Maharashtra.
The panel had earlier summoned Pawar in 2020, but he could not appear before it due to the coronavirus-induced lockdown.
Later, another summons was issued to Pawar for appearing before the commission on February 23 and 24 this year, but the senior politician had sought a fresh date, saying he wanted to file an additional affidavit before recording his testimony.
The affidavit was recently submitted.
Following this, the commission on Wednesday issued another summons to Pawar, said the panel's advocate, Ashish Satpute.
The NCP chief has been asked to appear before the inquiry commission on May 5 and 6, Satpute added.
Pawar had previously also filed an affidavit before the commission on October 8, 2018.
0 notes
shivahadi · 3 years
Photo
Tumblr media
#Lawyer and well-known tribal rights activist Sudha Bharadwaj walked out of Byculla women's prison today after over 1000 days of incarceration in the Bhima Koregaon – Elgar Parishad caste violence Case. Bharadwaj was arrested on August 28, 2018. The Special NIA court set 16 bail conditions for Bharadwaj yesterday. The Bombay High Court had directed Bharadwaj to be produced before the special court to decide her bail conditions after granting her default bail on December 1.The Special Court directed her to be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and cash security of Rs.50,000/-, giving her three months to arrange for one or more solvent sureties of the like amount. Her bail conditions are as follows Reside within the jurisdiction of the Mumbai court and shall not leave without the Special court's permission. Shall inform the court and the NIA immediately about her place of residence within Mumbai and her contact numbers. Bhardwaj would also have to give the contact numbers of her relatives residing with her.3)Shall submit a list of at least three blood relatives with their detailed residential and work addresses, with documentary proof.4)Must inform the NIA and the court if there is any change of her residential address while she is on bail.5)Submit copies of at least two identity proofs —passport, Aadhar card, PAN card, ration card, electricity bill, voter identity card.6) After the documents are submitted, the NIA shall conduct physical or virtual verification of her residential address and place a report before the court.7)Attend the proceedings of trial and shall see that the trial is not protracted due to her absence.8)Report to the nearest police station through WhatsApp video call fortnightly.,9) Shall not make any statement regarding the proceedings pending before the court before any form of media — print, electronic or social. 10)Not indulge in any activity similar to the activities on the basis of which the present FIR was registered against her for offences under the Indian Penal Code and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.11),shall surrender her passport.#sudhabharadwaj                  #uapa #bail #politicalprisioner #elgarp (at Mumbai) https://www.instagram.com/p/CXRQ8zNMvSDH8GqaNAKAT2aAssDlhtlJ5cTzfw0/?utm_medium=tumblr
0 notes
indianewsstream · 3 years
Link
0 notes