#Algorithmic Trading Companies

[stockexchangebrokers]

Algorithmic Trading Companies In India

Estee Advisory is a leading name among algorithmic trading companies in India, offering cutting-edge solutions for automated and data-driven trading. Specializing in advanced algorithms, risk management, and market analysis, they empower traders and institutions with precision, speed, and efficiency. With a focus on innovation and technology, Estee Advisory ensures optimal trading performance, making it a trusted partner for algorithmic trading strategies in the Indian financial markets.

[fractaleeffects]

Discovering the Best Stock Trading Strategy: A Guide to Maximizing Market Success

Taking the step to discover the optimal stock trading strategy involves a thorough knowledge of different methodologies, each designed for a specific style of trading and market situation. Here's a review of some leading strategies:

1. Day Trading

Day trading is buying and selling of stocks on the same trading day with a view to making profits from short-term movements of price. Day traders using this method tend to use technical analysis and may use means such as moving averages and volume indicators to make quick judgments. The strategy requires round-the-clock attention and a thorough grasp of market conditions. 

2. Swing Trading

Swing trading is designed to take advantage of gains by maintaining positions for days to weeks. Traders examine market trends, support and resistance, and momentum indicators to look for potential entry and exit points. This strategy balances the requirement for active management with the versatility of longer holding periods.

3. Position Trading

Position trading involves holding stocks over long periods of time, from several months to several years. The technique relies on the expectation that the value of a stock will increase over time, normally in tandem with fundamental analysis and macroeconomic reasons. ​

Investopedia

4. Scalping

Scalping is an actively traded high-frequency strategy that makes money off small price movements, where positions are held only for seconds or minutes. Scalpers make multiple trades per day, and this calls for discipline as well as a robust trading system to handle the high pace. ​

Investopedia

5. Algorithmic Trading

Algorithmic trading involves using computer programs to make trades in accordance with set parameters like timing, price, or volume. The approach reduces human intervention and is capable of processing large amounts of data at high speeds, which makes it ideal for efficiency and accuracy-seeking traders.

Hantec Markets

6. News Trading

News trading takes advantage of volatility in the market after economic announcements, earnings releases, or geopolitical developments. News traders track news feeds and respond immediately to take advantage of short-term price action created by new information.

Choosing the Ideal Strategy

Individual objectives, tolerance for risk, time available, and knowledge of the market dictate the ideal stock trading strategy. Beginner traders can begin with position or swing trading to learn gradually without the strain of quick decisions involved in scalping or day trading. Alternatively, seasoned traders with high-risk tolerance and access to monitor markets around the clock may prefer scalping or day trading.​

Ongoing Learning and Adjustment

The financial markets are ever-changing and are dependent upon a thousand different factors varying from economic markers to technological trends. Therefore, one needs to stay committed to perpetual learning and the ability to conform. Accessing learning resources and professional wisdom will go a long way in polishing one's trading skills.

fractaleffects.com

Lastly, the search for the Best Stock Trading Strategy is a subjective experience, which calls for the integration of knowledge, experience, and self-knowledge. With a strategy aligned to your own inclinations and a keen sense of market developments, you are better positioned for success in the world of stock trading.

[bigulalgotrading]

What is a Rights Issue?

The process of conducting a Rights Issue in India involves several crucial steps, each meticulously regulated by the SEBI and the Companies Act, 2013.

Read more..

[probablyasocialecologist]

Fifty per cent of web users are running ad blockers. Zero per cent of app users are running ad blockers, because adding a blocker to an app requires that you first remove its encryption, and that’s a felony. (Jay Freeman, the American businessman and engineer, calls this “felony contempt of business-model”.) So when someone in a boardroom says, “Let’s make our ads 20 per cent more obnoxious and get a 2 per cent revenue increase,” no one objects that this might prompt users to google, “How do I block ads?” After all, the answer is, you can’t. Indeed, it’s more likely that someone in that boardroom will say, “Let’s make our ads 100 per cent more obnoxious and get a 10 per cent revenue increase.” (This is why every company wants you to install an app instead of using its website.) There’s no reason that gig workers who are facing algorithmic wage discrimination couldn’t install a counter-app that co-ordinated among all the Uber drivers to reject all jobs unless they reach a certain pay threshold. No reason except felony contempt of business model, the threat that the toolsmiths who built that counter-app would go broke or land in prison, for violating DMCA 1201, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, trademark, copyright, patent, contract, trade secrecy, nondisclosure and noncompete or, in other words, “IP law”. IP isn’t just short for intellectual property. It’s a euphemism for “a law that lets me reach beyond the walls of my company and control the conduct of my critics, competitors and customers”. And “app” is just a euphemism for “a web page wrapped in enough IP to make it a felony to mod it, to protect the labour, consumer and privacy rights of its user”.

[lares-algotech]

Lares Algotech - Algo Trading Software Company in India

Lares Algotech is an algo trading company in India that is making a name for itself in the global market.

Learn more: https://freepressreleasedb.com/pr/How-Lares-Algotech-is-Using-Cutting-Edge-Algorithms-to-Deliver-High-Performance-Trading-Solutions-PR316623/

[archerswealth9]

The Importance of IPO: Unlocking Growth, Capital, and Opportunity

In the fast-paced world of finance, Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) have gained immense popularity in recent years. Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) play a vital role in the world of finance, serving as a gateway for private companies to access public markets and unlock substantial growth opportunities. IPOs bring numerous benefits to both the issuing companies and individual investors.

What is an IPO?

An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is a significant event in the life of a company, marking its transition from a privately held entity to a publicly traded one. Understanding IPOs involves knowing the basics of how they work and their implications for the company, investors, and the general public.

An IPO is the first time a company offers its shares to the public for purchase on a stock exchange. By offering ownership stakes, it empowers the company to raise capital and access funds for expansion and growth opportunities. The IPO process involves several stages, including selecting investment banks as underwriters, preparing the registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, conducting a roadshow to market the stock to potential investors, and finally, offering shares to the public.

Companies pursue IPOs to raise capital for various purposes, such as expanding operations, paying off debts, funding research and development, or providing liquidity to existing shareholders. Before the IPO, the company undergoes a valuation process to determine the initial offering price of its shares. This valuation is based on the company's financials, growth prospects, market conditions, and demand from investors.

IPOs not only open doors to new avenues of capital but also bring heightened visibility, credibility, and potential for substantial growth. These transformative events provide companies with access to public markets, enabling them to raise funds from a diverse group of investors. The importance of IPOs extends beyond the company itself, impacting investors, the economy, and the overall financial ecosystem. Let's delve deeper into why IPOs are considered crucial and how they shape the landscape of the business world.

Let us see the importance of IPOs, and their significance in terms of economic growth, fundraising, market expansion, and wealth creation.

Fueling Economic Growth: IPOs contribute to overall economic development by generating employment opportunities, attracting investments, and promoting innovation. When companies go public, they can access significant capital, which can be used to expand operations, invest in research and development, and foster technological advancements. This, in turn, drives economic growth, propelling industries forward and creating a favorable environment for job creation.

Access to Capital: IPOs offer companies a unique opportunity to raise substantial amounts of capital by selling shares to the public. This influx of funds allows businesses to finance expansion plans, repay debt, invest in infrastructure, or pursue acquisitions. By tapping into the public markets, companies can fund their growth strategies and accelerate their vision, while diversifying their capital structure.

Increased Visibility and Credibility: IPO enhances a company's visibility and credibility. It provides a public platform to showcase the company's achievements, strategies, and potential. Being listed on a recognized stock exchange also helps establish the company's reputation, instilling confidence in stakeholders.

Liquidity for Existing Shareholders: IPOs offer an exit strategy for early investors, founders, and employees holding private company shares. By making their shares tradable on public markets, these stakeholders can sell their holdings and realize their investments. This liquidity event not only allows these individuals to monetize their ownership stakes but also provides an opportunity for new investors to participate in the company's growth story.

Wealth Creation for Investors: Individual investors often see IPOs as an exciting opportunity to invest in high-growth companies at an early stage. Participating in IPOs allows investors to access the potential upside of these companies growth, potentially leading to substantial capital gains over time. IPO investing allows for portfolio diversification and the chance to participate in the growth of emerging industries, leading to the creation of wealth for individual investors.

The significance of IPOs cannot be understated. These transformative events provide companies with a pathway to growth, capital, and increased visibility while offering individual investors access to promising investment opportunities. IPOs foster economic development, attract capital, and fuel innovation, creating a positive impact on local and global economies. For investors, participating in IPOs can prove highly rewarding, enabling wealth creation and diversification. As companies continue to evolve and seize the benefits of going public, IPOs remain a vital component of the financial landscape, contributing to the growth and progress of businesses and economies alike.

Archers Wealth, a SEBI registered 

specializes in optimizing your investment portfolio by strategically allocating stocks across different sectors and seizing the right opportunities at the right time. Our expert team thoroughly analyzes your financial situation and goals and enhances your income through diverse investment avenues with Customized Portfolio Management Services in Pune.

We are happy to announce our Initial Public Offering (IPO), taking our company to new heights!

As we embark on this journey, we invite you to be part of our success story.

Unleash the potential of unique investment avenues, diversify your portfolio, and seize the opportunity to maximize returns with Archers.

Contact us for Algo Trading Services and Hedge Funds Services in Pune

[metaboxfy]

Cryptocurrency exchange development company

Metaboxfy is a cryptocurrency exchange development company you may hire to help you create a trading app for cryptocurrencies. Since the algorithm that controls its trading is customized by Metabofy, a cryptocurrency exchange development company, for precision and speed, the exchange functions normally.

Check It Out!

[what-even-is-thiss]

At what point does the Bay Area become so expensive that it’s devoid of human life and all that’s left is multi billion dollar shell companies trading properties between themselves with computer algorithms

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Trump loves Big Tech

I'm on a 20+ city book tour for my new novel PICKS AND SHOVELS. Catch me in SAN DIEGO at MYSTERIOUS GALAXY TONIGHT (Mar 24), and in CHICAGO with PETER SAGAL on Apr 2. More tour dates here.

The sight of the CEOs of Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Tiktok arranged in a decorative semicircle behind Trump on the dais on inauguration day was the final repudiation of the Obama-era notion that tech was somehow committed to democracy (or the Democrats).

These billionaires transferred millions from their personal accounts to Trump's "inauguration fund," a kind of presidential tip jar that Trump rattled under the noses of any convenient industry leaders hoping for preferential treatment from his regime. It paid off handsomely.

Just days before the inauguration, Trump flew to Davos where he told the world's leaders – especially in the EU – that he would not tolerate attempts to regulate US Big Tech companies, such as the EU's groundbreaking Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act:

https://gizmodo.com/trump-returns-big-techs-ass-kissing-at-davos-2000554158

There's been a lot of talk about how disillusioned liberals – especially those in Silicon Valley – are with Big Tech's heel turn, but what about the Trumpist factions that hate Big Tech? Plenty of people in the Trump base profess a hatred of Big Tech, and then there are the "Khanservatives" – JD Vance, Josh Hawley, Matt Goetz, Marsha Blackburn, Ted Cruz, etc – who aligned themselves with Biden's FTC Chair Lina Khan and professed a principled objection to Big Tech monopolies and even co-sponsored bills with the likes of Elizabeth Warren that were designed to strike at the root of tech monopolists power.

Trumpism – like every successful political movement – is a coalition. It's made up of factions who virulently disagree on key issues, and Trump himself is the arbiter of which faction emerges triumphant and which one will have to eat shit and like it:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/06/how-the-sausage-gets-made/#governing-is-harder

It's pretty clear at this point that the anti-Big Tech wing of the Trump Party has lost. Trump's saber-rattling is funneling billions into Big Tech's pockets and consolidating their power. Nowhere is this more visible than in the UK, where PM Keir Starmer fired the country's top anti-monopoly enforcer and replaced him with the former head of Amazon UK:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/22/autocrats-of-trade/#dingo-babysitter

But the British giveaways to US tech monopolists don't end there. Now, Starmer's announced plans to give a £800m/year tax giveaway to US Big Tech:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8j0dgym8w1o

If the Trumpist techbusters were truly sincere in their professed belief that Big Tech had too much power and must be broken up, then this should all be provoking howls of outrage from the Khanservatives – but they're all conspicuously silent.

Riley Quinn, showrunner of the amazing Trashfuture podcast, once proposed that the conservative animus towards Big Tech was driven entirely by grievances over content moderation algorithms that downranked conspiracy theories, racial slurs, and fundraising messages from grifting far-right politicians. Quinn joked that these conservative techbusters could be satisfied if every Big Tech board meeting was henceforth solemnized with a "Stolen Likes Acknowledgement," in which the execs publicly repudiated the fortunes their forerunners amassed through the suffering of shadowbanned culture warriors. Think of it as a Twitter Files mirror world doppelganger of the "stolen land" acknowledgments often heard before progressive meetings and presentations:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/05/not-that-naomi/#if-the-naomi-be-klein-youre-doing-just-fine

For its part, the EU is holding its ground in the face of Trumpism. Indeed, Trump's obnoxious belligerence has trashed the popularity of many of the EU's far right parties, especially in Scandinavia, where the burgeoning neofascist movement has lost nearly all momentum in the face of Trump's threats to annex Greenland away from Denmark:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g0718g3jwo

(The same thing has happened in Canada, where the Trumpist Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre has seen his massive polling leads collapse on the eve of a snap election):

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/livestory/canada-election-party-leaders-make-their-pitches-as-snap-campaign-kicks-off-9.6695126

But if the EU really wants to assert its sovereignty against American Big Tech, it should roll back Article 6 of the Copyright Directive, which copies the 1998 American Digital Millennium Copyright Act by banning reverse-engineering and modification of tech products and services:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/03/08/turnabout/#is-fair-play

By rolling back this legislation – which the US trade rep lobbied hard for, threatening tariffs on EU exports if it wasn't passed – the EU would open space for European companies to compete with American tech giants, striking at their most profitable lines of business. This would let EU companies make app stores for mobile devices and games consoles (so EU software authors wouldn't have to send 30% of all revenues to a US tech monopolist). It would also let EU companies jailbreak US cars, like Teslas, unlocking all their software upgrades and also seling made-in-the-EU apps to European drivers. This move would let EU mechanics fix any car without paying an American car company for an expensive diagnostic tool, and it would let EU small businesses refill printer ink cartridges, crashing the 10,000,000% margins enjoyed by US giants like HP.

Trump is in the tank for American Big Tech. He may have courted the anti-Big Tech wing of his movement by trash-talking US tech giants, but all it took was a few million in bribes and he changed his tune. US Big Tech is now an ascendant faction in the Trump Party coalition, which makes them fair game for the trade war.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/03/24/whats-good-for-big-tech/#is-good-for-america

[stockexchangebrokers]

Stock Exchange Broker In India

Estee Advisors is a leading stock exchange broker in India, specializing in algorithmic trading, low-latency brokerage services, and quant-based investment management. As a SEBI-registered broker, Estee provides high-frequency trading solutions, market-making services, and execution support for institutional investors. With expertise in Indian capital markets, they ensure efficient and reliable trade execution for global investors.

[collapsedsquid]

If you squint, you can make out versions of the same story — people bypassing the mainstream media to their own ends, the importance of social media in determining public perceptions of protest movements. There’s also an unmistakable tone shift from gently awestruck condescension to gently horrified condescension. (Disclosure: I was a reporter at the Times from 2016 to 2022, where I sometimes wrote about this subject.) In a far more significant sense, though, something is different. This week’s protests have been visible on social media, but their portrayals are fragmented, strange, and to people on the ground, often absurdly divorced from reality. If social media used to work for activists, or at least could,now it’s more effectively used against them. This sort of narrative role-swap isn’t new. For all the attention Twitter got as a factor in the 2011 Egyptian revolution — a story embraced by the company’s leadership — the story of social media’s role in Egypt’s politics since has mostly been one of suppression, surveillance, and harassment. An American version of this story has been taking shape for a while. The most significant factor isn’t really about tech — it’s that the current administration is proudly hostile to protest and has cited social-media posts as thin pretexts for no-process arrests and deportations. An administration that both routinely threatens activists with imprisonment, deportation, or worse is more than enough reason for activists to regroup in spaces where privacy can be maintained, not just traded for attention.

But social media really has been transformed, too, in ways both explicitly ideological and technical. Twitter, the platform people are most often referring to when they talk about these things, is owned by Elon Musk, who bought the platform with the explicit goal of disempowering its “woke” users and has more than accomplished his goal. Meta is still run by former BLM supporter Mark Zuckerberg, who more recently embraced Trump and pivoted to military contracting. TikTok, which is legally banned, is still online because the Trump administration promised not to enforce the law under vague and suggestive circumstances. Before its legal ban, TikTok’s rise set in motion industry trends that would alter social media’s relationship to activism in material ways. Meta, X, and Google reoriented their platforms around TikTok-style algorithmic video feeds, which relied less on users following one another and more on black-box per-user recommendations. For the platforms, this meant more engagement. For activists, it meant there were no longer coherent public conversations in which to intervene, against which to push back, or to join in any meaningful sense at all. Platforms that were once useful for understanding and following the news became venues for pure spectacular consumption. In some ways this was novel and strange, with hundreds of millions of people consuming individualized feeds determined by automated recommendations. In other ways, it was familiar, since it was a reversion to pre-social-media power dynamics. The platforms were no longer social, in any meaningful sense of the word, but rather centralized and exercising constant (algorithmic) editorial discretion. At least as much as the mainstream media that’s now been twice replaced, TikTok-ified social media rewards decontextualized spectacle. This can be useful for activists to bring attention, generally, to their causes — at least some of the large swing in support for Palestinians can surely be credited to the endless stream of horrific videos from Gaza, which are plenty powerful without further context and don’t require the authority of a trusted follow. More often, though, the lack of a common chronological feed — the crude social-media proxy for a “shared reality,” I guess — produces disorientation, uncertainty, and the ability to retreat completely into ideological safety, pure fantasy, or both.

[mariacallous]

The Trump administration’s Federal Trade Commission has removed four years’ worth of business guidance blogs as of Tuesday morning, including important consumer protection information related to artificial intelligence and the agency’s landmark privacy lawsuits under former chair Lina Khan against companies like Amazon and Microsoft. More than 300 blogs were removed.

On the FTC’s website, the page hosting all of the agency’s business-related blogs and guidance no longer includes any information published during former president Joe Biden’s administration, current and former FTC employees, who spoke under anonymity for fear of retaliation, tell WIRED. These blogs contained advice from the FTC on how big tech companies could avoid violating consumer protection laws.

One now deleted blog, titled “Hey, Alexa! What are you doing with my data?” explains how, according to two FTC complaints, Amazon and its Ring security camera products allegedly leveraged sensitive consumer data to train the ecommerce giant’s algorithms. (Amazon disagreed with the FTC’s claims.) It also provided guidance for companies operating similar products and services. Another post titled “$20 million FTC settlement addresses Microsoft Xbox illegal collection of kids’ data: A game changer for COPPA compliance” instructs tech companies on how to abide by the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act by using the 2023 Microsoft settlement as an example. The settlement followed allegations by the FTC that Microsoft obtained data from children using Xbox systems without the consent of their parents or guardians.

“In terms of the message to industry on what our compliance expectations were, which is in some ways the most important part of enforcement action, they are trying to just erase those from history,” a source familiar tells WIRED.

Another removed FTC blog titled “The Luring Test: AI and the engineering of consumer trust” outlines how businesses could avoid creating chatbots that violate the FTC Act’s rules against unfair or deceptive products. This blog won an award in 2023 for “excellent descriptions of artificial intelligence.”

The Trump administration has received broad support from the tech industry. Big tech companies like Amazon and Meta, as well as tech entrepreneurs like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, all donated to Trump’s inauguration fund. Other Silicon Valley leaders, like Elon Musk and David Sacks, are officially advising the administration. Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employs technologists sourced from Musk’s tech companies. And already, federal agencies like the General Services Administration have started to roll out AI products like GSAi, a general-purpose government chatbot.

The FTC did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WIRED.

Removing blogs raises serious compliance concerns under the Federal Records Act and the Open Government Data Act, one former FTC official tells WIRED. During the Biden administration, FTC leadership would place “warning” labels above previous administrations’ public decisions it no longer agreed with, the source said, fearing that removal would violate the law.

Since President Donald Trump designated Andrew Ferguson to replace Khan as FTC chair in January, the Republican regulator has vowed to leverage his authority to go after big tech companies. Unlike Khan, however, Ferguson’s criticisms center around the Republican party’s long-standing allegations that social media platforms, like Facebook and Instagram, censor conservative speech online. Before being selected as chair, Ferguson told Trump that his vision for the agency also included rolling back Biden-era regulations on artificial intelligence and tougher merger standards, The New York Times reported in December.

In an interview with CNBC last week, Ferguson argued that content moderation could equate to an antitrust violation. “If companies are degrading their product quality by kicking people off because they hold particular views, that could be an indication that there's a competition problem,” he said.

Sources speaking with WIRED on Tuesday claimed that tech companies are the only groups who benefit from the removal of these blogs.

“They are talking a big game on censorship. But at the end of the day, the thing that really hits these companies’ bottom line is what data they can collect, how they can use that data, whether they can train their AI models on that data, and if this administration is planning to take the foot off the gas there while stepping up its work on censorship,” the source familiar alleges. “I think that's a change big tech would be very happy with.”

[bigulalgotrading]

Urban Company IPO GMP, Open Date, Allotment Status, Listing Date, DRHP

Urban Company IPO open date is expected to be in the mid of June 2025 This IPO is a book built issue of ₹3000 crore plus expected Urban Company IPO GMP is 0.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

ANNA BONESTEEL AND EVAN GREER at Them:

Pride Month is over. As the “LOVE IS LOVE” banners come down and companies lose the rainbow gradients from their logos, we’re faced with a painful truth: LGBTQ+ people, especially the most marginalized among us, are in the crosshairs of a queerphobic backlash that is targeting our health, our histories, and especially our youth. And things are getting worse, not better. According to NPR, half of all US states now ban gender-affirming care for people under 18. Eight states now censor LGBTQ+ issues from school curricula via “Don’t Say Gay” laws, and two more states are considering similar legislation this year. The number-one book targeted for censorship is a graphic novel memoir about gender identity.

This June, Democratic lawmakers marched in Pride parades and spoke on stages, vowing to protect our community and fight back against legislative attacks on queer youth. But some of these same lawmakers are actively pushing federal legislation that would cut LGBTQ+ youth off from resources, information, and communities that can save their lives. Currently, 38 Democratic senators support the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), a bill that is vocally opposed by many queer and trans youth, along with a coalition of human rights and LGBTQ+ groups. As a queer- and trans-led advocacy group focused on the ways technology impacts human rights, our organization, Fight for the Future, has seen bills like KOSA before: misguided internet bills that try to solve real problems, but ultimately throw marginalized people under the bus by expanding censorship and surveillance rather than addressing corporate abuses. KOSA’s most obvious predecessor is SESTA/FOSTA, a Trump-era bill that its supporters claimed would clamp down on online sex trafficking. Instead, the bill did almost nothing to accomplish its goal, and has actively harmed LGBTQ+ people and sex workers whose harm-reduction resources were decimated by the subsequent crackdown on online speech.

Like SESTA/FOSTA, some of KOSA’s supporters have positive intent. Many lawmakers and organizations support KOSA because they are concerned about real harms caused by Big Tech, like addictive design features and manipulative algorithms. But, also like SESTA/FOSTA, KOSA doesn’t touch the core issues with Big Tech’s extractive, exploitative business model. Instead, KOSA relies on a “duty of care” model that will pressure social platforms to suppress any speech the government is willing to argue makes kids “depressed” or “anxious.”

Under KOSA, platforms could be sued for recommending a potentially depression- or anxiety-inducing video to anyone under 18. We know from past experience that in order to protect their bottom line, social media companies will overcompensate and actively suppress posts and groups about gender identity, sexuality, abortion — anything they’re worried the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) could be willing to argue “harms” kids. How do you think a potential Trump administration’s FTC would use that kind of authority?

Other features of the bill stretch its censorship potential further. Despite language claiming that the bill does not require platforms to conduct “age verification,” to meaningfully comply with the law, platforms will have to know who is under 18. This means they’ll institute invasive age verification systems or age-gating, which can completely cut off access for LGBTQ+ youth who have unsupportive parents, and/or make it unsafe for queer people to access online resources anonymously. KOSA creates powerful new ways for the government to interfere with online speech. For this reason, the bill is like catnip to extreme right-wing groups like the Heritage Foundation, the coordinators of Project 2025, who have explicitly said they want to use it to target LGBTQ+ content. KOSA’s lead Republican sponsor, Marsha Blackburn, has also said in an interview she wants to use KOSA to protect minors “from the transgender.”

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) purports to protect children, but in reality, it’s a censorship bill that would impact LGBTQ+ youth. #StopKOSA #KOSA

[reality-detective]

Brian Thompson was involved in several issues during his tenure at UnitedHealthcare:

1. Insider Trading Allegations:

Brian Thompson and other UnitedHealth Group executives were under investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for insider trading. They sold over $100 million in company stock before news of a federal antitrust probe became public. Specifically, Thompson sold shares worth $15.1 million in February before the investigation was widely reported.

2. Legal Issues: There was a lawsuit filed against UnitedHealth Group, including Thompson, by a firefighters' pension fund in Hollywood, Florida, accusing the executives of not disclosing this antitrust investigation to investors before it became public knowledge, which led to significant stock price drops.

3. Business Practices:

Social media posts and reports have highlighted dissatisfaction with UnitedHealthcare's practices under Thompson's leadership, including:

- High rate of claim denials, with some claims that the company turned down 32% of patient claims.

- Use of AI algorithms for claim processing, which reportedly had a high error rate, leading to the denial of medically necessary treatments.

These points indicate a history of legal scrutiny and public criticism regarding business practices during his tenure, although not all relate directly to legal actions against him personally. 🤔

[lares-algotech]

Discover the future of the Financial market with Algo trading company in India

Algo trading has become increasingly popular in recent years and for good reason. In this blog, we will explore the different benefits of an Algo trading company in India.

Continue reading: https://laresalgotech.com/future-of-financial-markets-benefits-of-an-algo-trading-company-in-india/