#Computer Sales and Services in No. 11 | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

mistakenot4892 · 8 months ago

Text

Disclaimer that this is a post mostly motivated by frustration at a cultural trend, not at any individual people/posters. Vagueing to avoid it seeming like a callout but I know how Tumblr is so we'll see I guess. Putting it after a read-more because I think it's going to spiral out of control.

Recent discourse around obnoxious Linux shills chiming in on posts about how difficult it can be to pick up computer literacy these days has made me feel old and tired. I get that people just want computers to Work and they don't want to have to put any extra effort into getting it to Do The Thing, that's not unreasonable, I want the same!

(I also want obnoxious Linux shills to not chip in on my posts (unless I am posting because my Linux has exploded and I need help) so I sympathise with that angle too, 'just use Linux' is not the catch-all solution you think it is my friend.)

But I keep seeing this broad sense of learned helplessness around having to learn about what the computer is actually doing without having your hand held by a massive faceless corporation, and I just feel like it isn't a healthy relationship to have with your tech.

The industry is getting worse and worse in their lack of respect to the consumer every quarter. Microsoft is comfortable pivoting their entire business to push AI on every part of their infrastructure and in every service, in part because their customers aren't going anywhere and won't push back in the numbers that might make a difference. Windows 11 has hidden even more functionality behind layers of streamlining and obfuscation and integrated even more spyware and telemetry that won't tell you shit about what it's doing and that you can't turn off without violating the EULA. They're going to keep pursuing this kind of shit in more and more obvious ways because that's all they can do in the quest for endless year on year growth.

Unfortunately, switching to Linux will force you to learn how to use it. That sucks when it's being pushed as an immediate solution to a specific problem you're having! Not going to deny that. FOSS folks need to realise that 'just pivot your entire day to day workflow to a new suite of tools designed by hobby engineers with really specific chips on their shoulders' does not work as a method of evangelism. But if you approach it more like learning to understand and control your tech, I think maybe it could be a bit more palatable? It's more like a set of techniques and strategies than learning a specific workflow. Once you pick up the basic patterns, you can apply them to the novel problems that inevitably crop up. It's still painful, particularly if you're messing around with audio or graphics drivers, but importantly, you are always the one in control. You might not know how to drive, and the engine might be on fire, but you're not locked in a burning Tesla.

Now that I write this it sounds more like a set of coping mechanisms, but to be honest I do not have a healthy relationship with xorg.conf and probably should seek therapy.

It's a bit of a stretch but I almost feel like a bit of friction with tech is necessary to develop a good relationship with it? Growing up on MS-DOS and earlier versions of Windows has given me a healthy suspicion of any time my computer does something without me telling it to, and if I can't then see what it did, something's very off. If I can't get at the setting and properties panel for something, my immediate inclination is to uninstall it and do without.

And like yeah as a final note, I too find it frustrating when Linux decides to shit itself and the latest relevant thread I can find on the matter is from 2006 and every participant has been Raptured since, but at least threads exist. At least they're not Microsoft Community hellscapes where every second response is a sales rep telling them to open a support ticket. At least there's some transparency and openness around how the operating system is made and how it works. At least you have alternatives if one doesn't do the job for you.

This is long and meandering and probably misses the point of the discourse I'm dragging but I felt obligated to make it. Ubuntu Noble Numbat is pretty good and I haven't had any issues with it out of the box (compared to EndeavourOS becoming a hellscape whenever I wanted my computer to make a sound or render a graphic) so I recommend it. Yay FOSS.

#linux #annoying linux shill discourse #i like the noble numbat he's a fine fellow

219 notes · View notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 11 months ago

Text

An open copyright casebook, featuring AI, Warhol and more

I'm coming to DEFCON! On Aug 9, I'm emceeing the EFF POKER TOURNAMENT (noon at the Horseshoe Poker Room), and appearing on the BRICKED AND ABANDONED panel (5PM, LVCC - L1 - HW1–11–01). On Aug 10, I'm giving a keynote called "DISENSHITTIFY OR DIE! How hackers can seize the means of computation and build a new, good internet that is hardened against our asshole bosses' insatiable horniness for enshittification" (noon, LVCC - L1 - HW1–11–01).

Few debates invite more uninformed commentary than "IP" – a loosely defined grab bag that regulates an ever-expaning sphere of our daily activities, despite the fact that almost no one, including senior executives in the entertainment industry, understands how it works.

Take reading a book. If the book arrives between two covers in the form of ink sprayed on compressed vegetable pulp, you don't need to understand the first thing about copyright to read it. But if that book arrives as a stream of bits in an app, those bits are just the thinnest scrim of scum atop a terminally polluted ocean of legalese.

At the bottom layer: the license "agreement" for your device itself – thousands of words of nonsense that bind you not to replace its software with another vendor's code, to use the company's own service depots, etc etc. This garbage novella of legalese implicates trademark law, copyright, patent, and "paracopyrights" like the anticircumvention rule defined by Section 1201 of the DMCA:

https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-lawsuit-takes-dmca-section-1201-research-and-technology-restrictions-violate

Then there's the store that sold you the ebook: it has its own soporific, cod-legalese nonsense that you must parse; this can be longer than the book itself, and it has been exquisitely designed by the world's best-paid, best-trained lawyer to liquefy the brains of anyone who attempts to read it. Nothing will save you once your brains start leaking out of the corners of your eyes, your nostrils and your ears – not even converting the text to a brilliant graphic novel:

https://memex.craphound.com/2017/03/03/terms-and-conditions-the-bloviating-cruft-of-the-itunes-eula-combined-with-extraordinary-comic-book-mashups/

Even having Bob Dylan sing these terms will not help you grasp them:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/10/25/musical-chairs/#subterranean-termsick-blues

The copyright nonsense that accompanies an ebook transcends mere Newtonian physics – it exists in a state of quantum superposition. For you, the buyer, the copyright nonsense appears as a license, which allows the seller to add terms and conditions that would be invalidated if the transaction were a conventional sale. But for the author who wrote that book, the copyright nonsense insists that what has taken place is a sale (which pays a 25% royalty) and not a license (a 50% revenue-share). Truly, only a being capable of surviving after being smeared across the multiverse can hope to embody these two states of being simultaneously:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/21/early-adopters/#heads-i-win

But the challenge isn't over yet. Once you have grasped the permissions and restrictions placed upon you by your device and the app that sold you the ebook, you still must brave the publisher's license terms for the ebook – the final boss that you must overcome with your last hit point and after you've burned all your magical items.

This is by no means unique to reading a book. This bites us on the job, too, at every level. The McDonald's employee who uses a third-party tool to diagnose the problems with the McFlurry machine is using a gadget whose mere existence constitutes a jailable felony:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/20/euthanize-rentier-enablers/#cold-war

Meanwhile, every single biotech researcher is secretly violating the patents that cover the entire suite of basic biotech procedures and techniques. Biotechnicians have a folk-belief in "patent fair use," a thing that doesn't exist, because they can't imagine that patent law would be so obnoxious as to make basic science into a legal minefield.

IP is a perfect storm: it touches everything we do, and no one understands it.

Or rather, almost no one understands it. A small coterie of lawyers have a perfectly fine grasp of IP law, but most of those lawyers are (very well!) paid to figure out how to use IP law to screw you over. But not every skilled IP lawyer is the enemy: a handful of brave freedom fighters, mostly working for nonprofits and universities, constitute a resistance against the creep of IP into every corner of our lives.

Two of my favorite IP freedom fighters are Jennifer Jenkins and James Boyle, who run the Duke Center for the Public Domain. They are a dynamic duo, world leading demystifiers of copyright and other esoterica. They are the creators of a pair of stunningly good, belly-achingly funny, and extremely informative graphic novels on the subject, starting with the 2008 Bound By Law, about fair use and film-making:

https://www.dukeupress.edu/Bound-by-Law/

And then the followup, THEFT! A History of Music:

https://web.law.duke.edu/musiccomic/

Both of which are open access – that is to say, free to download and share (you can also get handsome bound print editions made of real ink sprayed on real vegetable pulp!).

Beyond these books, Jenkins and Boyle publish the annual public domain roundups, cataloging the materials entering the public domain each January 1 (during the long interregnum when nothing entered the public domain, thanks to the Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act, they published annual roundups of all the material that should be entering the public domain):

https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/20/em-oh-you-ess-ee/#sexytimes

This year saw Mickey Mouse entering the public domain, and Jenkins used that happy occasion as a springboard for a masterclass in copyright and trademark:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/15/mouse-liberation-front/#free-mickey

But for all that Jenkins and Boyle are law explainers, they are also law professors and as such, they are deeply engaged with minting of new lawyers. This is a hard job: it takes a lot of work to become a lawyer.

It also takes a lot of money to become a lawyer. Not only do law-schools charge nosebleed tuition, but the standard texts set by law-schools are eye-wateringly expensive. Boyle and Jenkins have no say over tuitions, but they have made a serious dent in the cost of those textbooks. A decade ago, the pair launched the first open IP law casebook: a free, superior alternative to the $160 standard text used to train every IP lawyer:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140923104648/https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/openip/

But IP law is a moving target: it is devouring the world. Accordingly, the pair have produced new editions every couple of years, guaranteeing that their free IP law casebook isn't just the best text on the subject, it's also the most up-to-date. This week, they published the sixth edition:

https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/openip/

The sixth edition of Intellectual Property: Law & the Information Society – Cases & Materials; An Open Casebook adds sections on the current legal controversies about AI, and analyzes blockbuster (and batshit) recent Supreme Court rulings like Vidal v Elster, Warhol v Goldsmith, and Jack Daniels v VIP Products. I'm also delighted that they chose to incorporate some of my essays on enshittification (did you know that my Pluralistic.net newsletter is licensed CC Attribution, meaning that you can reprint and even sell it without asking me?).

(On the subject of Creative Commons: Boyle helped found Creative Commons!)

Ten years ago, the Boyle/Jenkins open casebook kicked off a revolution in legal education, inspiring many legals scholars to create their own open legal resources. Today, many of the best legal texts are free (as in speech) and free (as in beer). Whether you want to learn about trademark, copyright, patents, information law or more, there's an open casebook for you:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/14/angels-and-demons/#owning-culture

The open access textbook movement is a stark contrast with the world of traditional textbooks, where a cartel of academic publishers are subjecting students to the scammiest gambits imaginable, like "inclusive access," which has raised the price of textbooks by 1,000%:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/07/markets-in-everything/#textbook-abuses

Meanwhile, Jenkins and Boyle keep working on this essential reference. The next time you're tempted to make a definitive statement about what IP permits – or prohibits – do yourself (and the world) a favor, and look it up. It won't cost you a cent, and I promise you you'll learn something.

Support me this summer on the Clarion Write-A-Thon and help raise money for the Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers' Workshop!

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/30/open-and-shut-casebook/#stop-confusing-the-issue-with-relevant-facts

Image: Cryteria (modified) Jenkins and Boyle https://web.law.duke.edu/musiccomic/

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

#pluralistic #jennifer jenkins #james boyle #ip #law #law school #publishing #open access #scholarship #casebooks #copyright #copyfight #gen ai #ai #warhol

182 notes · View notes

autolenaphilia · 2 years ago

Text

The main reason to use Firefox and Linux and other free and open source software is that otherwise the big tech monopolies will fuck you as the customer over in search of profits. They will seek to control how you use their products and sell your data. When a company dominates the market, things can only get worse for ordinary people.

Like take Google Chrome for example, which together with its chromium reskins dominate the web browser market. Google makes a lot of money from ads, and consequently the company hates adblockers. They already are planning to move to manifest V3, which will nerf adblockers significantly. The manifest V3 compatible chrome version of Ublock Orgin is a "Lite" version for a reason. Ublock's Github page has an entire page explaining why the addon works best in Firefox.

And Google as we speak are trying to block adblockers from working on Youtube, If you want to continue blocking Youtube ads, and since Youtube ads make the site unuseable you ought to want that, it makes the most sense to not use a browser controlled by Google.

And there is no reason to think things won't get worse. There is for example nothing stopping Google from kicking adblockers off their add-on stores completely. They do regard it as basically piracy if the youtube pop-ups tell us anything, so updating the Chrome extensions terms of service to ban adblocking is a natural step. And so many people seem to think Chrome is the only browser that exists, so they are not going to switch to alternatives, or if they do, they will switch to another chrominum-based browser.

And again, they are fucking chromium itself for adblockers with Manifest V3, so only Firefox remains as a viable alternative. It's the only alternative to letting Google control the internet.

And Microsoft is the same thing. I posted before about their plans to move Windows increasingly into the cloud. This already exists for corporate customers, as Windows 365. And a version for ordinary users is probably not far off. It might not be the only version of Windows for awhile, the lack of solid internet access for a good part of the Earth's population will prevent it. But you'll probably see cheap very low-spec chromebookesque laptops running Windows for sale soon, that gets around Windows 11's obscene system requirements by their Windows being a cloud-based version.

And more and more of Windows will require Internet access or validation for DRM reasons if nothing else. Subscription fees instead of a one-time license are also likely. It will just be Windows moving in the direction Microsoft Office has already gone.

There is nothing preventing this, because again on the desktop/laptop market Windows is effectively a monopoly, or a duopoly with Apple. So there is no competition preventing Microsoft from exercising control over Windows users in the vein of Apple.

For example, Microsoft making Windows a walled garden by only permitting programs to be installed from the Microsoft Store probably isn't far off. This already exists for Win10 and 11, it's called S-mode. There seem to be more and more laptops being sold with Windows S-mode as the default.

Now it's not the only option, and you can turn it off with some tinkering, but there is really nothing stopping Microsoft from making it the only way of using Windows. And customers will probably accept it, because again the main competition is Apple where the walled garden has been the default for decades.

Customers have already accepted all sorts of bad things from Microsoft, because again Windows is a near-monopoly, and Apple and Google are even worse. That’s why there has been no major negative reaction to how Windows has increasingly spies on its users.

Another thing is how the system requirements for Windows seem to grow almost exponentially with each edition, making still perfectly useable computers unable to run the new edition. And Windows 11 is the worst yet. Like it's hard to get the numbers of how many computers running Win10 can't upgrade to Win11, but it's probably the majority of them, at least 55% or maybe even 75%. This has the effect of Windows users abandoning still perfectly useable hardware and buying new computers, creating more e-waste.

For Windows users, the alternative Windows gives them is to buy a new computer or get another operating system, and inertia pushes them towards buying another computer to keep using Windows. This is good for Windows and the hardware manufacturers selling computers with Windows 11 pre-installed, they get to profit off people buying Windows 11 keys and new computers, while the end-users have to pay, as does the environment. It’s planned obsolescence.

And it doesn’t have to be like that. Linux distros prove that you can have a modern operating system that has far lower hardware requirements. Even the most resource taxing Linux distros, like for example Ubuntu running the Gnome desktop, have far more modest system requirements than modern Windows. And you can always install lightweight Linux Distros that often have very low system requirements. One I have used is Antix. The ballooning Windows system requirements comes across as pure bloat on Microsoft’s part.

Now neither Linux or Firefox are perfect. Free and open source software don’t have a lot of the polish that comes with the proprietary products of major corporations. And being in competition with technology monopolies does have its drawbacks. The lacking website compatibility with Firefox and game compatibility with Linux are two obvious examples.

Yet Firefox and Linux have the capacity to grow, to become better. Being open source helps. Even if Firefox falls, developers can create a fork of it. If a Linux distro is not to your taste, there is usually another one. Whereas Windows and Chrome will only get worse as they will continue to abuse their monopolistic powers over the tech market.

#my writings #mozilla firefox #google chrome #microsoft windows #linux #open source #foss

846 notes · View notes

callmearcturus · 1 year ago

Text

@vmprsm replied to your post “Raw MKV rip of Mission Impossible: Fallout:...”:

Theoretically, if one wanted their own copies of the MI movies safely on a hard drive....where would one go?

I mean, there is a site where you can acquire a lot of movies via torrent. I tend to use (rot13) 1337k.gb and I got a heavily discounted Windscribe VPN subscription that I use on almost all of my devices.

But my thing is that... I want commentary reels and special features, and sometimes you'll download a movie but the fucking subtitles are either bad or they become desynced over time and I haaaaate it.

So I've been gathering bits and pieces over the past year to get a Plex system going in my house and it works like a fucking DREAM. But it requires some investment. If you just want to have a few local copies of your favorite movies, this is way overkill. But me, I am canceling all of my family's streaming services and pivoting to our Plex.

So what I have for actually getting the files:

I don't have this model but it's similar to this, a Pioneer External Blu-ray Reader. It sits on a little shelf and is connected to my PC by a USB cable. (I think I got mine for around 68 bucks so you can wait for a sale.)

I use MakeMKV which will rip the big honking raw files from a Blu-ray and leave them as matroshka (.mkv) files.

Because these raw files are ENORMOUS, I compress them in Handbrake. Handbrake is wildly powerful, can convert file formats and make them super small. I have my Handbrake set up special to dump all the non-English language subtitles and audio tracks to save space.

(SUPER BONUS TIP FOR HANDBRAKE: If you have a dedicated GPU, you can give Handbrake permission to use it, and it'll compress shit literally 10x faster, love it.)

At the moment, I am using a Western Digital portable 5TB external harddrive because it was one sale and I couldn't beat the price. Eventually, I want to upgrade to two 10TB HDDs so I can keep a full backup of everything I'm ripping. Because this is a bit of a time and energy commitment and I don't wanna lose all my progress here!

At first I was running Plex off my desktop PC and that worked totally fine, but my family hates having to touch my desktop to wake it up every time, so I very recently grabbed one of these guys:

This is a Beelink Mini PC S12 Pro. It is small enough to fit in my hand but it is a speedy little demon that runs Windows 11. (And eventually I am gonna use it to firewall out ads from our entire home network, I'm pumped for that project but ANYWAY.)

The upside of these mini boys is that instead of being a hefty workhorse like my main computer, this is small and has a low-power draw.

So I moved my Plex Media Server to the mini PC, plugged in my 5TB drive of movies, and now everyone in the house can easily stream anything I have added to the library.

This is what it looks like, if you're curious. Any device in the house that runs Plex and is signed in can select any movie or TV show I have and just watch it like it was Netflix or something.

A month ago, I has like.... 65 movies? Now I'm ripping a few and we're gonna break 100 soon.

"But Arc, where do you get so many blurays!"

My local library.

When I lived in Broward County, FL, I had an extravagantly wonderful library system. Tax dollars at fucking WORK, y'all. Now I live in Georgia and the library system is not nearly as good, but I have still gotten my hands on a frankly ridiculous amount of blurays. Every week I'm picking up 3 to 10 movies or shows, taking them home, making good copies, and returning them.

All of this is an investment and it is work. But as someone who built my computer, built my keyboard, cracked my 3DS and PS Vita-- this is fun to me! This is what I love to do. And through doing it, I've seen more movies in the past year than the last ten years put together.

So yeah, I can't recommend this to everyone, but if you wanna get out of your subscriptions and to just have high quality shit on demand, this is what I'm doing.

Cannot stress this enough tho, if this seems interesting to you: wait for sales. All the components here go on steep sale if you wait patiently. Take your time assembling the parts and keep in mind that shit is modular, you can upgrade parts later.

#vmprsm #i'm a fucking nerd okay

74 notes · View notes

emilieautumnarchives · 9 months ago

Text

My iPod FOR SALE!!

Posted: September 11, 2007 Archived from BonnyTymePyrate’s Journal Archives

eBay. It’s bourgeois. It’s a rip-off. It’s garishly designed It’s the temporary home of my iPod!!!!!

You read correctly! With the advent of the iPhone, I will no longer require the services of my trusty iPod a.k.a. Mr. Brigglesby to sustain me on those all-day-all-night road trips from country to country to country and back again. He’s seen some great times though…pit-stops in Vienna…cathedrals in Cologne…sleeping in Scotland (he steals the covers). He knows my ins-and-outs, he’s great at shuffling, and he knows exactly what song to play to put me right back into a bad mood when I’m starting to feel just a little too happy.

And now, he can do it for YOU!

Proceeds from the sale of my iPod will go towards crack and prostitutes, and believe me, between me and the Crumpets, we go through a lot of both. Anyway! Whatever is left after the crack and hos will go towards the purchase of fancy new fabrics for our stage costumes for the upcoming Winter Asylum Tour, crafted for your viewing pleasure! And, oh, won’t you feel special knowing you helped to make them…

BID on Mr. Brigglesby HERE:

Here are the specs, bitches: Bloody Massive, SIGNED by MEEEE, 20 Gig Pod, Updated Software Black & White Light-Up Screen (no color, no video) Can be used as a hard drive No health issues, works like it did the day it was born The usual scratches in the metal backing, no dents, just normal cosmetic wear that tells you it’s been looooved… Any other questions, please ask via the eBay site, because even though eBay eSucks, you’ll get your question answered faster than you will here, where you most certainly won’t get a response in time because I am working sleeplessly and living in a cave. Includes: 1. USB cable (powers directly from your computer) 2. A personal note of introduction from Mr. Brigglesby to you 3. What about earbuds? FUCK no, it doesn’t come with my earbuds/phones/whatevers, because that would be disgusting and unsanitary, and you don’t want my ear-germs anyway, because even though I think I’m clean, I’ve never been tested, so let’s just not chance it, ok? EXTRAS: Here’s the fun part!! 1. GIGS of music already loaded (delete it if you hate metal) including: MY COMPLETE RECORDED CATALOG (Opheliac Double Disc, Liar/Dead EP, Laced/Unlaced, Enchant Rerelease, A Bit O’ This And That, Saw 3 Soundtrack), Angelspit, ASP, The Beatles, Bjork, Blutengel, The Chamber, Children Of Bodom, Cinema Strange, David Bowie, Dimmu Borgir, Dope Stars Inc., Dragonforce, Dreamtheatre, Einsturzende Neubauten, Finntroll, Flaming Lips, Gackt, Batman Begins Soundtrack, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Soundtrack, Jeff Buckley, The Killers, MaIice Mizer, Ministry, Moi dix Mois, Monty Python, Peter Murphy, Morrissey, The Smiths, Prodigy, Psyclon Nine, Queen, Rammstein, Schwarz Stein, Sex Pistols, The Shins, Sigur R�s, Steve Vai, Telepopmusik, Van Halen, Velvet Acid Christ, X Japan, and of course, Yngwie Malmsteen…AND MORE!!! *** MAKE MR. BRIGGLESBY YOUR BITCH TODAY! *** Final Note: I bought myself flowers today as a reward for never having bought myself flowers before. I was very grateful. Perhaps now I should go out drinking, come home late, and make myself sleep on the couch. Love & Bloody Crumpets from the Asylum for Wayward Victorian Girls, EA

#2007 #ipod #opheliac era #journal #journals #journal entries #journal archives

6 notes · View notes

educationtech · 9 months ago

Text

Top Technical Skills for Electronics Engineer Resume in 2024

Electronics and Communication Engineering (ECE) offers a wide array of career opportunities due to its interdisciplinary nature, combining principles from electronics, telecommunications, and computer science. Here are the top 15 career options for graduates in this field:

1. Telecom Engineer

Telecom engineers design and manage communication systems, including optical fibers, microwave transmission, and IP networks. They analyze existing technologies and develop new solutions to enhance communication reliability and efficiency.

2. R&D Software Engineer

These engineers focus on creating and testing new software products. They play a crucial role in research and development, working on automation and mechanical controls to improve software systems across various industries.

3. Software Analyst

Software analysts design, develop, and test software applications, ensuring they meet user needs. They act as a bridge between developers and users, managing software updates and enhancing user experience.

4. Electronic Design Engineer

Electronic design engineers create electronic circuits and devices tailored to specific requirements. They work on projects ranging from consumer electronics to complex communication systems.

5. Embedded Systems Engineer

Embedded systems engineers develop software for embedded systems found in various devices like appliances, medical equipment, and automotive systems. This role requires proficiency in both hardware and software development.

6. Network Engineer

Network engineers design, implement, and manage computer networks within organizations. They ensure network security and optimize performance for efficient data transfer.

7. Service Engineer

Service engineers maintain and repair electronic equipment used in various industries. Their work ensures that systems operate smoothly, minimizing downtime for businesses.

8. Technical Sales Engineer

In this role, engineers leverage their technical knowledge to sell complex electronic products or services. They often work closely with clients to understand their needs and provide tailored solutions.

9. Quality Assurance Engineer

Quality assurance engineers focus on testing products to ensure they meet required standards before they are released to the market. This role involves developing testing protocols and analyzing results to improve product quality.

10. Systems Engineer

Systems engineers oversee the integration of various subsystems into a complete system, ensuring all components work together effectively. This role is critical in projects involving complex electronic systems.

11. Electronics Technician

Electronics technicians assist in the design, development, and testing of electronic equipment. They often work under the supervision of engineers to troubleshoot issues and perform repairs.

12. Data Analyst

Data analysts in the ECE field focus on interpreting data related to electronic systems or communications networks. They use statistical tools to provide insights that can improve system performance or user experience.

13. Technical Director

Technical directors oversee engineering projects from conception through execution, ensuring technical feasibility while managing teams of engineers. They play a pivotal role in strategic planning within organizations.

14. Chief Technical Officer (CTO)

As a senior executive, the CTO is responsible for overseeing the technological direction of a company. This role involves strategic decision-making regarding technology investments and innovations.

15. Research Scientist

Research scientists in ECE focus on advancing knowledge in areas like telecommunications or signal processing through experimental research or theoretical analysis. This role often requires advanced degrees (MTech or PhD) for positions in academia or specialized industries.

Conclusion

Arya College of Engineering & I.T. is the Best Engineering College in Jaipur that gives career landscape for Electronics and Communication Engineers is diverse and continually evolving due to rapid technological advancements. Graduates can choose from various roles across multiple sectors including telecommunications, IT, manufacturing, aerospace, healthcare, and more, making ECE a promising field for aspiring professionals seeking dynamic career paths.

#Engineering #Arya College #Jaipur

2 notes · View notes

mindyourtopics44 · 1 year ago

Text

25 Python Projects to Supercharge Your Job Search in 2024

Introduction: In the competitive world of technology, a strong portfolio of practical projects can make all the difference in landing your dream job. As a Python enthusiast, building a diverse range of projects not only showcases your skills but also demonstrates your ability to tackle real-world challenges. In this blog post, we'll explore 25 Python projects that can help you stand out and secure that coveted position in 2024.

1. Personal Portfolio Website

Create a dynamic portfolio website that highlights your skills, projects, and resume. Showcase your creativity and design skills to make a lasting impression.

2. Blog with User Authentication

Build a fully functional blog with features like user authentication and comments. This project demonstrates your understanding of web development and security.

3. E-Commerce Site

Develop a simple online store with product listings, shopping cart functionality, and a secure checkout process. Showcase your skills in building robust web applications.

4. Predictive Modeling

Create a predictive model for a relevant field, such as stock prices, weather forecasts, or sales predictions. Showcase your data science and machine learning prowess.

5. Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Build a sentiment analysis tool or a text summarizer using NLP techniques. Highlight your skills in processing and understanding human language.

6. Image Recognition

Develop an image recognition system capable of classifying objects. Demonstrate your proficiency in computer vision and deep learning.

7. Automation Scripts

Write scripts to automate repetitive tasks, such as file organization, data cleaning, or downloading files from the internet. Showcase your ability to improve efficiency through automation.

8. Web Scraping

Create a web scraper to extract data from websites. This project highlights your skills in data extraction and manipulation.

9. Pygame-based Game

Develop a simple game using Pygame or any other Python game library. Showcase your creativity and game development skills.

10. Text-based Adventure Game

Build a text-based adventure game or a quiz application. This project demonstrates your ability to create engaging user experiences.

11. RESTful API

Create a RESTful API for a service or application using Flask or Django. Highlight your skills in API development and integration.

12. Integration with External APIs

Develop a project that interacts with external APIs, such as social media platforms or weather services. Showcase your ability to integrate diverse systems.

13. Home Automation System

Build a home automation system using IoT concepts. Demonstrate your understanding of connecting devices and creating smart environments.

14. Weather Station

Create a weather station that collects and displays data from various sensors. Showcase your skills in data acquisition and analysis.

15. Distributed Chat Application

Build a distributed chat application using a messaging protocol like MQTT. Highlight your skills in distributed systems.

16. Blockchain or Cryptocurrency Tracker

Develop a simple blockchain or a cryptocurrency tracker. Showcase your understanding of blockchain technology.

17. Open Source Contributions

Contribute to open source projects on platforms like GitHub. Demonstrate your collaboration and teamwork skills.

18. Network or Vulnerability Scanner

Build a network or vulnerability scanner to showcase your skills in cybersecurity.

19. Decentralized Application (DApp)

Create a decentralized application using a blockchain platform like Ethereum. Showcase your skills in developing applications on decentralized networks.

20. Machine Learning Model Deployment

Deploy a machine learning model as a web service using frameworks like Flask or FastAPI. Demonstrate your skills in model deployment and integration.

21. Financial Calculator

Build a financial calculator that incorporates relevant mathematical and financial concepts. Showcase your ability to create practical tools.

22. Command-Line Tools

Develop command-line tools for tasks like file manipulation, data processing, or system monitoring. Highlight your skills in creating efficient and user-friendly command-line applications.

23. IoT-Based Health Monitoring System

Create an IoT-based health monitoring system that collects and analyzes health-related data. Showcase your ability to work on projects with social impact.

24. Facial Recognition System

Build a facial recognition system using Python and computer vision libraries. Showcase your skills in biometric technology.

25. Social Media Dashboard

Develop a social media dashboard that aggregates and displays data from various platforms. Highlight your skills in data visualization and integration.

Conclusion: As you embark on your job search in 2024, remember that a well-rounded portfolio is key to showcasing your skills and standing out from the crowd. These 25 Python projects cover a diverse range of domains, allowing you to tailor your portfolio to match your interests and the specific requirements of your dream job.

If you want to know more, Click here:https://analyticsjobs.in/question/what-are-the-best-python-projects-to-land-a-great-job-in-2024/

#python projects #top python projects #best python projects #analytics jobs #python #coding #programming #machine learning

2 notes · View notes

mynewjerseycaraccident · 2 years ago

Text

Benefits Of Kmspico Microsoft Windows Activator

KMSPICO works as an activation software that grants users the ability to install Windows and Microsoft Products for both free or for a lifetime. It's easy-to-use and comes with a smaller software package that can be easily installed. Furthermore, it is completely safe to use as there are no viruses nor malware in it.

There is no need to generate product keys.

It's no mystery that MS products tend to cost a lot. Nonetheless, there exist ways around paying for these heftily priced products. One method utilized is by using activation. This program allows the activation of pirated versions of Windows, as well as other Windows products, for no cost. The most notable feature is the fact that this tool is virus- and malware- free.

The application operates by interacting with a trusted server, which holds various authorized keys for Windows Activation. It's important for users to understand that all systems cannot be activated with panacea. It is also not compatible with all Microsoft Office versions.

Many people have claimed that an antivirus program has advised against downloading and installing kmspico windows 10 due to its alleged shadiness and connection with malware. Despite being warned, the KMSPICO tool continues to be used regularly by those who seek a cost-effective and dependable way of activating their pirated Windows. This holds especially true for those students who are unable to purchase a licensed version of Microsoft's software.

No risk of Fraude detection.

KMSpico acts as a fake key management service server. KMS Servers are utilized to license Microsoft applications for organizations with large volumes. KMSPICO can infringe Microsoft's service agreements and result in software piracy. Moreover, using this software can lead to legal troubles since it infringes copyright law.

Many cybersecurity experts advise against obtaining KMSPICO. These cheat tools tend to be distributed via fake downloading portals, search engines, and sales websites. These may be accompanied by self-signed certificates that attempt to make them seem authentic. These programs can potentially pose a danger as being Headless Trojans or Malware. This renders them hard to recognize by anti-virus programs.

KMSPICO may cause software activations or pop-up warnings and inhibit users' access to updates, support, and other features available only through licensed products. In addition, this application can lead users to malicious websites that aim to gather personal data or inflict viruses. To prevent these threats, only utilize a legitimate program that is also free.

KMSpico is easy to use and does not contain any viruses or malware that can harm the computer.

KMSpico is easy to use and does NOT contain any virus or malicious code that can damage the computer. It does NOT rely on an Internet connection and will not make the computer sluggish or perform poorly. Its installation and usage are simple.

KMSPICO supports both the modern as well as the vintage editions of both Windows® and MS Office®. It utilizes a software program known as KMS, which communicates with a remote server for activating Microsoft software. Unlike some activators, kmspico for windows 11 does NOT install any patches or cracked versions of the OS and remains updated frequently.

kmspico can be downloaded for FREE from reputable websites and used to reactivate Microsoft Products for ever. It is a simple tool that doesn't require any technical knowledge to operate. It's a straightforward tool to operate that doesn't require any technological knowledge. It can be used to both conserve money while still obtaining the highest quality features from branded Microsoft software.

The lifetime license is valid for two years.

KMSPico ranks among the select few activators that grants a perpetual license. It supports activating both Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office Products, which include the most recent version of Windows 10. It supports using both 32- and 64-bit systems. Unlike many other activator software, this one is not obstructed by a complicated installation and can be downloaded and utilized for free.

KMSPico, which is frequently employed by piraters to circumvent Microsoft licensing requirements, is plagued by numerous flaws and should never be used. It is particularly dangerous if it's downloaded through a phishing website. It is capable of modifying system configurations and restricting access control to disaster recovery and backup images. It's important that cybersecurity, legality, and security are given a higher priority when selecting software licenses and activations. This explains why using authentic Microsoft software is preferred. Furthermore, this approach ensures the compliance with copyright legislation and supports software authenticity. Additionally, it can prevent users from incurring expensive license fees by preventing unauthorized installation.

KMSPICO can be used free of-charge and permanently unlock Microsoft Windows and all other products. It's easy to use and relatively small in size, making it very easy for users to set up. KMSPICO is completely safe to use and doesn't include any virus or malicious code.

There is no need to purchase product keys anymore.

It's no surprise that purchasing Microsoft can become expensive. Nonetheless, there exist ways around paying for these heftily priced products. One method utilized is by using activation. This program allows the activation of pirated versions of Windows, as well as other Windows products, for no cost. The most notable feature is the fact that this tool is virus- and malware- free.

Many people have claimed that an antivirus program has advised against downloading and installing kmspico windows 10 due to its alleged shadiness and connection with malware. Despite being warned, the KMSPICO tool continues to be used regularly by those who seek a cost-effective and dependable way of activating their pirated Windows. This applies particularly to students who may lack the funds to purchase a licensed version of Windows.

No risk of Fraude detection.

KMSpico acts as a fake key management service server. KMS Servers are utilized to license Microsoft products for larger organizations. KMSPICO can infringe Microsoft's service agreements and result in software piracy. Moreover, using this software can lead to legal troubles since it infringes copyright law.

Many cybersecurity experts advise against obtaining KMSPICO. These cheat tools tend to be distributed via fake downloading portals, search engines, and sales websites. These programs may also contain self-signed certificates, attempting to make them look legitimate. These programs can pose a threat because of being infected with trojan-like and potentially infected malware, which can make them extremely difficult for antivirus software to identify.

KMSPICO may cause software activations or pop-up warnings and inhibit users' access to updates, support, and other features available only through licensed products. In addition, this application can lead users to malicious websites that aim to gather personal data or inflict viruses. To minimize these risks, ensure that the software utilized is both legitimately and completely free.

KMSpico is easy to use and does not contain any viruses or malware that can harm the computer.

KMSpico is easy to use and does NOT contain any virus or malicious software that can infect or damage the computer. It does NOT rely on an Internet connection and will not make the computer sluggish or perform poorly. Its size of the software is compact, making it easy for users to easily set up and utilize.

KMSPICO supports both the modern as well as the vintage editions of both Windows® and MS Office®. It utilizes a software program known as KMS, which communicates with a remote server for activating Microsoft software. Unlike some activators, it doesn't require installing any patches or cracked operating systems, and it is frequently updated.

kmspico windows 10 can be downloaded for FREE from reputable websites and used to reactivate Microsoft Products for ever. It is a simple tool that doesn't require any technical knowledge to operate. It's a straightforward tool that doesn't require any technological knowledge. It allows users to acquire a discounted price while still getting the superior features that come with a licensed Microsoft system.

A lifetime license is available for purchase.

KMSPico ranks among the select few activators that grants a perpetual license. It supports activating Microsoft Office and Windows products, which include the most recent version of Microsoft. It supports using both 32- and 64-bit systems. Unlike many other activators, this one does not need any complicated installation and can be downloaded and used immediately.

KMSPico, which is frequently employed by piraters to circumvent Microsoft licensing requirements, is plagued by numerous flaws and should never be used. It is particularly dangerous if it's downloaded through a phishing website. It may also modify system configurations and obstruct access to recovering options such as shadow volumes. It's important that cybersecurity, legality, and security are given a higher priority when selecting software licenses and activations. This explains why using authentic Microsoft software is preferred. Additionally, this technique ensures that software is in compliance and authenticated. Additionally, it can prevent users from incurring expensive license fees by preventing unauthorized installation.

#Kmspico

3 notes · View notes

digitalmore · 10 days ago

Text

#IFTTT #Digital More

0 notes

jobskolkata · 17 days ago

Text

Marketing Coordinator || Back Office Coordinator Job|| Export Documentation Job ||Camac Street || Export Company || Kolkata || West Bengal || India

Unlock Your Dream Job!

In this Job Post, we dive into the "Ideal Career Zone," revealing the secrets to finding your perfect profession!

Whether you’re hunting for a #job, searching #Naukri, or exploring new #Chakri options, we’ve got you covered with expert tips and career advice. From understanding your passions to mastering job searches and acing interviews, we empower you to navigate the competitive landscape with confidence!

Join us and discover how to elevate your career journey today!

Company Introduction: The Company is a reputed export company specializing in minerals and chemicals. With a strong presence in the global market, we cater to a diverse range of industries, including ceramics, glass, paint, footwear, and many more.

Their journey began 11 years ago, with a vision to provide high-quality products and exceptional customer service. Over the years, they have grown and expanded their operations, investing in state-of-the-art infrastructure and technology.

Here are some potential job opportunities for post of Marketing Coordinator:

Job Description for Marketing Coordinator.

Company is looking for an enthusiastic and passionate candidate. The Candidate will be responsible for making outbound calls to inform or promote the company's product or service. Given their reliance on spoken language, ought to display excellent verbal communication. The candidate should have a positive attitude and excellent telephone etiquette.

Role and Responsibility

Handle all inbound/outbound Enquiries.

Address client queries.

Follow up with clients.

Schedule and coordinate meetings.

Requirements:

· Fluency in English/Hindi/Bengali

· Excellent Communication.

· Interacting via various channel, such as chat emails, social media and direct calls

· Obtaining and updating lists of individuals' contact details.

· Calling active and budding clients to encourage the purchase of items.

· Addressing clients' uncertainties, grievances, and suggestions on time.

· Noting important details of each conversation.

· Communicating verbal acceptances of offers to our sales team for closing.

. Time to Time updation of reports, clients details and keep a record on excel.

Requirements:

Female employees preferably

Graduate/ diploma or equivalent.

Minimum work experience 1-2 yrs in Industry calling.

Prior experience in cold calling .

Computer literate: can prepare reports in Word/Excel/PPT formats.

Need to make 30 connected calls and prepare MIS reports.

Ability to switch your communication style on a whim.

Capacity to receive critique without internalizing it.

IQ level to act as per the clients requirements .

Salary Range: The salary range for this post as per industry and experienced.

* Note:- You can find many more job details in various posts in various companies.

You may call us between 9 am to 8 pm

8 7 7 7 2 1 1 zero 1 6

9 3 3 1 2 zero 5 1 3 3

Or you can visit our office.

Ideal Career Zone

128/12A, BidhanSraniShyam Bazaar metro Gate No.1 Gandhi Market Behind Sajjaa Dhaam Bed Sheet Bed cover Show room Kolkata 7 lakh 4

Thank you for watching our channel Please subscribed and like our videos for more jobs opening. Thank You again.

#MarketingCoordinator, #BackOfficeCoordinatorJob, #ExportDocumentationJob, #CamacStreet, #ExportCompany, #Kolkata, #WestBengal, #India,

0 notes

tknblog · 1 month ago

Text

Are Apple Silicon Macs too good?

In his latest video Luke Miani asks if #Apple made their new machines too good. Across two polls, having run a second one to verify the results of the first, respondents strongly indicated they had no intention of upgrading their early M-series Macs. I have a feeling Apple fully expected that, however. Watch the video on YouTube. We have three Mini’s, two M1 and one Intel, and have no need to upgrade them anytime soon. I may desire an M4 Mini, but I don’t need one. What is behind this?

To understand this there are, I believe, two different, unrelated factors that need to be taken into consideration:

Apple’s primary drivers of revenue are the #iPhone, the App Store, and services.

There are millions upon millions of #Windows users who might choose to move to Apple rather than be forced upgrade to Windows 11 but cannot since their hardware is incompatible, because #Microsoft has chosen to enshittify their desktop with ads and #AI, or both.

Apple’s personal computer marketshare has long been around 20% with Microsoft dominating for literal decades with 72% of the PC market. But it’s critical to understand that a decade ago Microsoft had well over 80%, and it continues to slowly decay. The iPhone plays a significant role in the fact that Apple has a $2.5T valuation, as consumers tend to upgrade every two years, giving Apple a mostly reliable playing field to project consistent revenues.

NOTE: Microsoft has a similar market capitalization to Apple but the important distinction is that Microsoft engages in a wide range of markets, including corporate software and services, as well as the Xbox and video games publishing, all of which contribute to the company’s bottom line. Apple still competes by offering a mere fraction of the models and verticals of its rivals.

That consistency is crucial. It allows Apple to not only sit back and just let their Mac users be Mac users and upgrade as they please, but also breathing room for some mild experimentation with various services and hardware. The iPhone Mini was available for the iPhone 12 and 13 then cancelled to be replaced by the Plus model, which has been around longer than the Mini. And the next rumored experiment will be the iPhone Air which may appear this October. They’ve also got enough in the bank to allow them to pivot and shift based on unforeseen market fluctuations or, in the case of component availability, weather the less than stellar rollout of the moderately underwhelming M3 processor.

And Apple isn’t blind. I’m quite sure that one major consideration in their calculations is Microsoft and their recent “efforts” to tank their own success. Users are unhappy with Windows 11 and in October of this year Microsoft will be ending support for the far more popular Windows 10. Many users are even downgrading to Windows 10 to escape the oppressive changes in Windows 11. In addition, the upgrade to Windows 11 requires support for TPM 2.0 which will “relegate” millions of unsupported systems to be discarded or sold for cheap, an outcome that is exciting many nerds over the prospect of a torrent of dirt cheap or free computers which can happily and securely run #Linux and other operating systems. Linux is an easy and capable migration path, but being honest with ourselves, most Windows users won’t go this direction.

I think Apple knows this. For one, they’ve maintained a stability in offerings that is appealing when compared to Microsoft’s numerous radical shifts over the years, the frequency of which has started to turn off consumers. Second, Apple has been aggressive in allowing resellers to offer significant sale pricing and even has an exclusive deal with Walmart to sell new M1 Macbook Air base models for $700 and which is on seemingly permanent sale for $650. In most of Apple’s history this is unprecedented, as they have for decades required resellers to match their own pricing and not offer sales. Finally, Apple’s resale value for their Intel models has dropped precipitously and used M1 and M2 machines are a lot more affordable than they used to be, presenting an enticing option for budget buyers.

Apple, for the most part, has played the long game. Pixar focused on getting one particular element perfected for each film so they might add that element to their toolbox for later films like fur in Monsters Inc. and the ocean in Finding Nemo. Apple has done much the same, working on iterations of various elements of their systems, refining them until they meet their internal expectations for excellence. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Steve Jobs ran both and had, with help from others to manifest his vision, been instrumental in forming the foundations of two entire industries. Ingest that in whatever form you prefer.

The short answer to the question posed by Luke is no. The suggestion that CEO Tim Cook and the entire team at Apple could have miscalculated that the potential longevity of their products could cause Apple, one of the wealthiest corporations on planet Earth, to disintegrate or fall into the doldrums of relevance is in itself a miscalculation of what Apple is and how it operates. Is Apple flawless? Hell no. Most recently, I think they horribly miscalculated both the retail price and consumer interest in Apple Vision. There are other failures dotting Apple’s history, as well.

On the other hand, they basically own the tablet market. Full stop. They swap first and second place with Samsung for mobile phone volume, and Samsung has to make dozens of models to compete with Apple. AirPods are stupid popular. The Apple Watch has a huge chunk of the smart watch market. Apple is doing well, and all whilst offering a fraction of the options of others they compete with.

#tech #technology #opinion

0 notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 2 years ago

Text

The (open) web is good, actually

I'll be at the Studio City branch of the LA Public Library tonight (Monday, November 13) at 1830hPT to launch my new novel, The Lost Cause. There'll be a reading, a talk, a surprise guest (!!) and a signing, with books on sale. Tell your friends! Come on down!

The great irony of the platformization of the internet is that platforms are intermediaries, and the original promise of the internet that got so many of us excited about it was disintermediation – getting rid of the middlemen that act as gatekeepers between community members, creators and audiences, buyers and sellers, etc.

The platformized internet is ripe for rent seeking: where the platform captures an ever-larger share of the value generated by its users, making the service worst for both, while lock-in stops people from looking elsewhere. Every sector of the modern economy is less competitive, thanks to monopolistic tactics like mergers and acquisitions and predatory pricing. But with tech, the options for making things worse are infinitely divisible, thanks to the flexibility of digital systems, which means that product managers can keep subdividing the Jenga blocks they pulling out of the services we rely on. Combine platforms with monopolies with digital flexibility and you get enshittification:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys

An enshittified, platformized internet is bad for lots of reasons – it concentrates decisions about who may speak and what may be said into just a few hands; it creates a rich-get-richer dynamic that creates a new oligarchy, with all the corruption and instability that comes with elite capture; it makes life materially worse for workers, users, and communities.

But there are many other ways in which the enshitternet is worse than the old good internet. Today, I want to talk about how the enshitternet affects openness and all that entails. An open internet is one whose workings are transparent (think of "open source"), but it's also an internet founded on access – the ability to know what has gone before, to recall what has been said, and to revisit the context in which it was said.

At last week's Museum Computer Network conference, Aaron Straup Cope gave a talk on museums and technology called "Wishful Thinking – A critical discussion of 'extended reality' technologies in the cultural heritage sector" that beautifully addressed these questions of recall and revisiting:

https://www.aaronland.info/weblog/2023/11/11/therapy/#wishful

Cope is a museums technologist who's worked on lots of critical digital projects over the years, and in this talk, he addresses himself to the difference between the excitement of the galleries, libraries, archives and museums (GLAM) sector over the possibilities of the web, and why he doesn't feel the same excitement over the metaverse, and its various guises – XR, VR, MR and AR.

The biggest reason to be excited about the web was – and is – the openness of disintermediation. The internet was inspired by the end-to-end principle, the idea that the network's first duty was to transmit data from willing senders to willing receivers, as efficiently and reliably as possible. That principle made it possible for whole swathes of people to connect with one another. As Cope writes, openness "was not, and has never been, a guarantee of a receptive audience or even any audience at all." But because it was "easy and cheap enough to put something on the web," you could "leave it there long enough for others to find it."

That dynamic nurtured an environment where people could have "time to warm up to ideas." This is in sharp contrast to the social media world, where "[anything] not immediately successful or viral … was a waste of time and effort… not worth doing." The social media bias towards a river of content that can't be easily reversed is one in which the only ideas that get to spread are those the algorithm boosts.

This is an important way to understand the role of algorithms in the context of the spread of ideas – that without recall or revisiting, we just don't see stuff, including stuff that might challenge our thinking and change our minds. This is a much more materialistic and grounded way to talk about algorithms and ideas than the idea that Big Data and AI make algorithms so persuasive that they can control our minds:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/06/attention-rents/#consumer-welfare-queens

As bad as this is in the social media context, it's even worse in the context of apps, which can't be linked into, bookmarked, or archived. All of this made apps an ominous sign right from the beginning:

https://memex.craphound.com/2010/04/01/why-i-wont-buy-an-ipad-and-think-you-shouldnt-either/

Apps interact with law in precisely the way that web-pages don't. "An app is just a web-page wrapped in enough IP to make it a crime to defend yourself against corporate predation":

https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/27/an-audacious-plan-to-halt-the-internets-enshittification-and-throw-it-into-reverse/

Apps are "closed" in every sense. You can't see what's on an app without installing the app and "agreeing" to its terms of service. You can't reverse-engineer an app (to add a privacy blocker, or to change how it presents information) without risking criminal and civil liability. You can't bookmark anything the app won't let you bookmark, and you can't preserve anything the app won't let you preserve.

Despite being built on the same underlying open frameworks – HTTP, HTML, etc – as the web, apps have the opposite technological viewpoint to the web. Apps' technopolitics are at war with the web's technopolitics. The web is built around recall – the ability to see things, go back to things, save things. The web has the technopolitics of a museum:

https://www.aaronland.info/weblog/2014/09/11/brand/#dconstruct

By comparison, apps have the politics of a product, and most often, that product is a rent-seeking, lock-in-hunting product that wants to take you hostage by holding something you love hostage – your data, perhaps, or your friends:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

When Anil Dash described "The Web We Lost" in 2012, he was describing a web with the technopolitics of a museum:

where tagging was combined with permissive licenses to make it easy for people to find and reuse each others' stuff;

where it was easy to find out who linked to you in realtime even though most of us were posting to our own sites, which they controlled;

where a link from one site to another meant one person found another person's contribution worthy;

where privacy-invasive bids to capture the web were greeted with outright hostility;

where every service that helped you post things that mattered to you was expected to make it easy for you take that data back if you changed services;

where inlining or referencing material from someone else's site meant following a technical standard, not inking a business-development deal;

https://www.anildash.com/2012/12/13/the_web_we_lost/

Ten years later, Dash's "broken tech/content culture cycle" described the web we live on now:

https://www.anildash.com/2022/02/09/the-stupid-tech-content-culture-cycle/

found your platform by promising to facilitate your users' growth;

order your technologists and designers to prioritize growth above all other factors and fire anyone who doesn't deliver;

grow without regard to the norms of your platform's users;

plaster over the growth-driven influx of abusive and vile material by assigning it to your "most marginalized, least resourced team";

deliver a half-assed moderation scheme that drives good users off the service and leaves no one behind but griefers, edgelords and trolls;

steadfastly refuse to contemplate why the marginalized users who made your platform attractive before being chased away have all left;

flail about in a panic over illegal content, do deals with large media brands, seize control over your most popular users' output;

"surface great content" by algorithmically promoting things that look like whatever's successful, guaranteeing that nothing new will take hold;

overpay your top performers for exclusivity deals, utterly neglect any pipeline for nurturing new performers;

abuse your creators the same ways that big media companies have for decades, but insist that it's different because you're a tech company;

ignore workers who warn that your product is a danger to society, dismiss them as "millennials" (defined as "anyone born after 1970 or who has a student loan")

when your platform is (inevitably) implicated in a murder, have a "town hall" overseen by a crisis communications firm;

pay the creator who inspired the murder to go exclusive on your platform;

dismiss the murder and fascist rhetoric as "growing pains";

when truly ghastly stuff happens on your platform, give your Trust and Safety team a 5% budget increase;

chase growth based on "emotionally engaging content" without specifying whether the emotions should be positive;

respond to ex-employees' call-outs with transient feelings of guilt followed by dismissals of "cancel culture":

fund your platforms' most toxic users and call it "free speech";

whenever anyone disagrees with any of your decisions, dismiss them as being "anti-free speech";

start increasing how much your platform takes out of your creators' paychecks;

force out internal dissenters, dismiss external critics as being in conspiracy with your corporate rivals;

once regulation becomes inevitable, form a cartel with the other large firms in your sector and insist that the problem is a "bad algorithm";

"claim full victim status," and quit your job, complaining about the toll that running a big platform took on your mental wellbeing.

https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/18/broken-records/#dashes

The web wasn't inevitable – indeed, it was wildly improbable. Tim Berners Lee's decision to make a new platform that was patent-free, open and transparent was a complete opposite approach to the strategy of the media companies of the day. They were building walled gardens and silos – the dialup equivalent to apps – organized as "branded communities." The way I experienced it, the web succeeded because it was so antithetical to the dominant vision for the future of the internet that the big companies couldn't even be bothered to try to kill it until it was too late.

Companies have been trying to correct that mistake ever since. After three or four attempts to replace the web with various garbage systems all called "MSN," Microsoft moved on to trying to lock the internet inside a proprietary browser. Years later, Facebook had far more success in an attempt to kill HTML with React. And of course, apps have gobbled up so much of the old, good internet.

Which brings us to Cope's views on museums and the metaverse. There's nothing intrinsically proprietary about virtual worlds and all their permutations. VRML is a quarter of a century old – just five years younger than Snow Crash:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VRML

But the current enthusiasm for virtual worlds isn't merely a function of the interesting, cool and fun experiences you can have in them. Rather, it's a bid to kill off whatever is left of the old, good web and put everything inside a walled garden. Facebook's metaverse "is more of the same but with a technical footprint so expensive and so demanding that it all but ensures it will only be within the means of a very few companies to operate."

Facebook's VR headsets have forward-facing cameras, turning every users into a walking surveillance camera. Facebook put those cameras there for "pass through" – so they can paint the screens inside the headset with the scene around you – but "who here believes that Facebook doesn't have other motives for enabling an always-on camera capturing the world around you?"

Apple's VisionPro VR headset is "a near-perfect surveillance device," and "the only thing to save this device is the trust that Apple has marketed its brand on over the last few years." Cope notes that "a brand promise is about as fleeting a guarantee as you can get." I'll go further: Apple is already a surveillance company:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

The technopolitics of the metaverse are the opposite of the technopolitics of the museum – even moreso than apps. Museums that shift their scarce technology budgets to virtual worlds stand a good chance of making something no one wants to use, and that's the best case scenario. The worst case is that museums make a successful project inside a walled garden, one where recall is subject to corporate whim, and help lure their patrons away from the recall-friendly internet to the captured, intermediated metaverse.

It's true that the early web benefited from a lot of hype, just as the metaverse is enjoying today. But the similarity ends there: the metaverse is designed for enclosure, the web for openness. Recall is a historical force for "the right to assembly… access to basic literacy… a public library." The web was "an unexpected gift with the ability to change the order of things; a gift that merits being protected, preserved and promoted both internally and externally." Museums were right to jump on the web bandwagon, because of its technopolitics. The metaverse, with its very different technopolitics, is hostile to the very idea of museums.

In joining forces with metaverse companies, museums strike a Faustian bargain, "because we believe that these places are where our audiences have gone."

The GLAM sector is devoted to access, to recall, and to revisiting. Unlike the self-style free speech warriors whom Dash calls out for self-serving neglect of their communities, the GLAM sector is about preservation and access, the true heart of free expression. When a handful of giant companies organize all our discourse, the ability to be heard is contingent on pleasing the ever-shifting tastes of the algorithm. This is the problem with the idea that "freedom of speech isn't freedom of reach" – if a platform won't let people who want to hear from you see what you have to say, they are indeed compromising freedom of speech:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/10/e2e/#the-censors-pen

Likewise, "censorship" is not limited to "things that governments do." As Ada Palmer so wonderfully describes it in her brilliant "Why We Censor: from the Inquisition to the Internet" speech, censorship is like arsenic, with trace elements of it all around us:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMMJb3AxA0s

A community's decision to ban certain offensive conduct or words on pain of expulsion or sanction is censorship – but not to the same degree that, say, a government ban on expressing certain points of view is. However, there are many kinds of private censorship that rise to the same level as state censorship in their impact on public discourse (think of Moms For Liberty and their book-bannings).

It's not a coincidence that Palmer – a historian – would have views on censorship and free speech that intersect with Cope, a museum worker. One of the most brilliant moments in Palmer's speech is where she describes how censorship under the Inquistion was not state censorship – the Inquisition was a multinational, nongovernmental body that was often in conflict with state power.

Not all intermediaries are bad for speech or access. The "disintermediation" that excited early web boosters was about escaping from otherwise inescapable middlemen – the people who figured out how to control and charge for the things we did with one another.

When I was a kid, I loved the writing of Crad Kilodney, a short story writer who sold his own self-published books on Toronto street-corners while wearing a sign that said "VERY FAMOUS CANADIAN AUTHOR, BUY MY BOOKS" (he also had a sign that read, simply, "MARGARET ATWOOD"). Kilodney was a force of nature, who wrote, edited, typeset, printed, bound, and sold his own books:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books/article-late-street-poet-and-publishing-scourge-crad-kilodney-left-behind-a/

But there are plenty of writers out there that I want to hear from who lack the skill or the will to do all of that. Editors, publishers, distributors, booksellers – all the intermediaries who sit between a writer and their readers – are not bad. They're good, actually. The problem isn't intermediation – it's capture.

For generations, hucksters have conned would-be writers by telling them that publishing won't buy their books because "the gatekeepers" lack the discernment to publish "quality" work. Friends of mine in publishing laughed at the idea that they would deliberately sideline a book they could figure out how to sell – that's just not how it worked.

But today, monopolized film studios are literally annihilating beloved, high-priced, commercially viable works because they are worth slightly more as tax writeoffs than they are as movies:

https://deadline.com/2023/11/coyote-vs-acme-shelved-warner-bros-discovery-writeoff-david-zaslav-1235598676/

There's four giant studios and five giant publishers. Maybe "five" is the magic number and publishing isn't concentrated enough to drop whole novels down the memory hole for a tax deduction, but even so, publishing is trying like hell to shrink to four:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/07/random-penguins/#if-you-wanted-to-get-there-i-wouldnt-start-from-here

Even as the entertainment sector is working to both literally and figuratively destroy our libraries, the cultural heritage sector is grappling with preserving these libraries, with shrinking budgets and increased legal threats:

https://blog.archive.org/2023/03/25/the-fight-continues/

I keep meeting artists of all description who have been conditioned to be suspicious of anything with the word "open" in its name. One colleague has repeatedly told me that fighting for the "open internet" is a self-defeating rhetorical move that will scare off artists who hear "open" and think "Big Tech ripoff."

But "openness" is a necessary precondition for preservation and access, which are the necessary preconditions for recall and revisiting. Here on the last, melting fragment of the open internet, as tech- and entertainment-barons are seizing control over our attention and charging rent on our ability to talk and think together, openness is our best hope of a new, good internet. T

he cultural heritage sector wants to save our creative works. The entertainment and tech industry want to delete them and take a tax writeoff.

As a working artist, I know which side I'm on.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/13/this-is-for-everyone/#revisiting

Image: Diego Delso (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Museo_Mimara,_Zagreb,_Croacia,_2014-04-20,_DD_01.JPG

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

189 notes · View notes