#Criminal Traffic attorney Phoenix

[turnaboutfix]

Good evening pals it's time for more "things I like about the Ace Attorney Anime despite the budget being less than what I have in my piggy bank". Tonight is one of my favorite adaption decisions from "Farewell, My Turnabout" (obvious Spoilers for that case, you have been warned).

To start, the art in the anime is often pretty funky and off model, but I wanted to highlight this frame when Phoenix is talking to Matt Engarde in the detention center with his reflection in the shot. It is genuinely well drawn and downright horrifying. Actually, the whole episode has pretty good draftsmen working on the character animation, considering.

I could honestly leave it as is, but this next scene is what I want to talk about the most. (I have to leave some stuff out because of the 30 image limit--I took like 50 screencaps of this scene in total lol--so bare with me.) Phoenix steps out of the Detention center to see a certain prosecutor waiting for him.

The following conversation takes place in the Criminal Affairs Department in the game, but in the anime, it takes place in Edgeworth's office! (RIP Eddy's Bratworth outfit which is just a 2D image on that wall lmao--again, there are some well drawn stuff but this is just silly.) Another note: the text is from the sub with the localized English names, and it's a bit different from the dub.

This shot lingers for a bit, and you hear traffic outside before the following happens. The rest is under the cut.

Brilliant, incredible, amazing, showstopping, spectacular, never the same... you get the idea haha. I love it very much.

[davidsoncriminal]

Fresh Start

Expungement is the legal procedure of sealing or erasing criminal records, effectively removing them from public view. This can provide individuals with a fresh new start by allowing them to legally state that they have not been convicted of a crime. At Davidson Criminal Defense & DUI Law Firm, their experienced Phoenix Expungement Attorney helps clients navigate the complexities of expungement in Arizona. Led by dedicated Phoenix Assault Attorney Joshua S. Davidson, the firm offers comprehensive legal assistance to individuals seeking to clear their criminal records. They understand the importance of expungement in restoring personal and professional opportunities and work diligently to achieve favorable outcomes for their clients. Davidson Criminal Defense & DUI Law Firm provides personalized guidance and advocacy throughout the expungement process, ensuring thorough representation and support.

The Transportation System in Phoenix, Arizona

Phoenix, Arizona, has a great transportation system that makes getting around the city easy. The Valley Metro provides buses and light rail services that connect many parts of the city. The light rail is a fast and convenient way to travel, especially to popular spots like downtown and the airport. There are also bike lanes and paths for those who prefer to cycle. For people who drive, the highways and roads are well-maintained and make it easy to travel by car. Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport is a primary airport, making air travel convenient. The transportation system in Phoenix indeed helps people get where they need to go quickly and efficiently.

Heard Museum in Phoenix, AZ

The Heard Museum in Phoenix is a special place that celebrates Native American culture and art. It has many beautiful exhibits showing the history and traditions of Native American tribes, especially those from the Southwest. You can see amazing pottery, jewelry, and textiles made by Native American artists. The museum also has interesting displays about the lives and stories of Native people. There are hands-on activities and programs for kids to learn about Native American culture. The Heard Museum hosts festivals and events throughout the year, where you can catch traditional dances and music. It's a great place to learn about the rich heritage of Native Americans and see their beautiful artwork.

Motorcyclist Dead After Veering Off Road, Striking Tree in Phoenix

Motorcyclists can keep safe on the road by following important safety tips. First, always wear a helmet that meets security standards to protect your head in case of a crash. Second, wear bright or reflective clothing to make yourself more visible to other drivers. Third, obey traffic laws and speed limits to avoid accidents. Fourth, use your signals and be aware of your surroundings, especially when changing lanes or turning. Fifth, avoid riding in bad weather conditions that could make roads slippery or reduce visibility. Finally, take a motorcycle safety course to learn skills and techniques for safe riding. By following these tips, motorcyclists can help ensure their safety on the road.

Link to maps

Heard Museum 2301 N Central Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States Take Thomas Rd to AZ-51 N 8 min (3.0 mi) Follow AZ-51 N to E Cactus Rd. Take exit 10 from AZ-51 N 8 min (8.6 mi) Continue on E Cactus Rd to your destination 5 min (1.9 mi) Davidson Criminal Defense & DUI Law Firm - Phoenix 11811 N Tatum Blvd UNIT 3031, Phoenix, AZ 85028, United States

[biznetnews]

Phoenix DUI Lawyers Cheer Changes In DUI Laws

Being arrested for a DUI can be frightening for the majority of people. Numerous Arizonans charged with DUIs do not have any previous experience with the criminal justice system and do not know what may happen to them.

The knowledgeable Phoenix DUI Lawyers at Colburn Hintze Maletta can help you comprehend the charges you face and assist you through the process. We are aggressive criminal defense attorney who strive to secure the very best possible results for our customers.

We have actually detailed details about the various types of DUI charges, the charges, and proven reliable DUI defenses below.

What Is A Standard or Regular DUI?

A basic DUI in Arizona can be charged under Arizona Statute ARS 28-1381(A)( 1) or (A)( 2 ). Under the (A)( 1) statute, you can be charged with a routine DUI if you have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% to 0.149% within two hours of when the cops stopped you.

Additionally, even if your BAC is listed below 0.08%, you can be charged with a DUI if you are impaired to the smallest degree by drugs or alcohol while driving or having real physical control of your automobile.

When you receive your citation for a novice misdemeanor DUI, it is common to see both ARS 28-1381 (A)( 1) and ARS 28-1381 (A)( 2) noted.

Even if you are convicted of a very first standard DUI offense, the charges can be serious. A very first basic DUI conviction consists of a necessary minimum jail sentence of 10 days. However, if you complete an alcohol evaluation and classes, 9 out of the 10 days can be suspended.

Additionally, you can be put on probation for approximately 5 years if convicted of a novice standard DUI.

There are also minimum fines and assessments of $1,480, and your license can be suspended for a minimum of 90 days. You will have to install an ignition interlock device on your automobile from 6 months as much as one year and finish any alcohol classes that are purchased.

The Arizona MVD will examine 8 points versus your license and require you to finish a Traffic Survival School course if convicted of a regular DUI. A routine DUI charge can likewise include other expenses, consisting of auto insurance premium boosts, SR-22 insurance, car impoundment costs, jail expenses, and others.

Read more at CHMLaw.com

phoenix dui lawyers,dui lawyer near me,phoenix dui attorney

...

[criminaltrafficlawyerphoenixaz]

Traffic lawyers can help you avoid unnecessary fines, lower insurance rates, & prevent additional traffic offenses.

The first thing you should know about traffic tickets is that they are not all created equal. Some will be simple and require little or no attention, while others could result in a jail sentence or a license suspension. Even the most minor traffic violations can have costly and potentially life-altering consequences. This is why it pays to consult with a reputable Phoenix Traffic lawyer.

Typically, a traffic attorney will offer their client the best options and recommendations.

Name: Criminal Lawyers in Phoenix Arizona Phone: (602) 835-0602 Website: https://criminallawyersinphoenixarizona.com/criminal-traffic-lawyers-phoenix-az/

[governmentagencynews]

TUCSON, Ariz. – A Phoenix-area man was sentenced Oct. 21 to 188 months in prison for child exploitation offenses following a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and U.S. Border Patrol investigation.Robert Allen Yost, 61, of Phoenix, previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to sex traffic children and production of child pornography, as well as conspiracy to transport illegal aliens for profit. Upon release from prison, Yost will be placed on lifetime supervised release with sex offender conditions and will be required to register as a sex offender. “The sentence imposed on this despicable individual ensures that he will not have another opportunity to exploit another child through his perverse behavior, or engage in human smuggling,” said Scott Brown, special agent in charge, HSI Phoenix. “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to target those who believe they can hide their grotesque actions where ever they may be.” In March 2020, Border Patrol agents initially encountered Yost smuggling undocumented noncitizens along State Route 80, when a search of his phone revealed child exploitation content. During his guilty plea on Jan. 18, Yost admitted that he had exchanged pictures and videos depicting child sexual abuse with other people via text messages and the internet. He also admitted that he asked another individual to send sexually explicit images of a child in that individual’s custody and offered methamphetamine in exchange for sexual access to the child. The intended sexual activity with the child did not take place due to other intervening circumstances. This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by U.S. Attorney’s Offices and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc. HSI encourages the public to report suspected child predators and any suspicious activity through its toll-free Tip Line at 1-866-DHS-2-ICE or by completing its online tip form. Both are staffed around the clock by investigators. From outside the U.S. and Canada, callers should dial 802-872-6199. Hearing impaired users can call TTY 802-872-6196. Suspected child sexual exploitation incidents or missing children may be reported to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, an Operation Predator partner, via its toll-free 24-hour hotline, 1-800-THE-LOST. HSI is a founding member of the Virtual Global Taskforce, an international alliance of law enforcement agencies and private industry sector partners working together to prevent and deter online child sexual abuse. U.S. Attorneys Carin Duryee and Jared Kreamer Hope, District of Arizona, Tucson, prosecuted the case. HSI is the principal investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), responsible for investigating transnational crime and threats, specifically those criminal organizations that exploit the global infrastructure through which international trade, travel, and finance move. HSI’s workforce of over 10,400 employees consists of more than 6,800 special agents assigned to 225 cities throughout the United States, and 93 overseas locations in 56 countries. HSI’s international presence represents DHS’s largest investigative law enforcement presence abroad and one of the largest international footprints in U.S. law enforcement.

[aceattorneyheritageposts]

Are we allowed to submit stuff from the pre-tumblr era as "heritage posts"? The Akward Zombie comic that was fandubbed made me think of early youtube fanvideos like "Smooth Criminal", which, imo are more than iconic, but I wanted to know if it being on Tumblr was a pre-requisite or if it's more of a general "Ace Attorney memes over time" kinda thing. Anyways, thank you for this blog! (*˘︶˘*).｡*♡

Hi anon and thank you for the thanks and for the cute face emoji thing ^_^

Been hmm-ing over this very question for a while because there are certain things I do want to post like akward zombie comics because of their iconic-ness within the fandom just as you say, but i feel somewhat uncomfortable with the idea of reposting things on this blog, because i want all creators to get appropriate credit for/traffic to their work.

that being said, it now occurs to me that if you submit a youtube link its a moot point, all views and clicks and such will go to that video regardless of who posted it. so go ahead, i'd say

I know i'd certainly like to have things like Boot To The Head, Smooth Criminal, Objection Funk etc on here, maybe even some Phoenix Wrong if any of those are still as funny as i found them ten years ago, lol

yeah anyway feel free to submit youtube links everyone if you think theyre of appropriate popularity/heritageness, though it being from OP's own channel and not a reupload would be a great bonus if at all possible.

[phoenixazlawyers]

https://ift.tt/3p5DghP

 Drug Crimes Overview

In Arizona, it is illegal to sell or manufacture dangerous drugs and use or possess drugs without a valid prescription. If you have been charged with a drug crime by law enforcement, chances are you will need a defense lawyer to help build a case against the prosecution for your drug charges. Without an attorney for proper representation, you risk receiving maximum punishments for your crimes, which could potentially result in prison and multiple assessment fees and fines. The jail time you receive will depend on what type of drug you were charged with, whether or not you had the intent to distribute, and whether or not you have prior convictions.

Without an attorney for proper representation, you risk receiving maximum punishments for your crimes

By choosing to hire a drug crimes lawyer, you will have legal counsel to help you build a solid defense for your case. If you were arrested and placed in jail, your attorney would also be able to help you with the possibility of lowering your bail, depending upon the severity of your crimes.

Attorney Michael Alarid III has effectively represented numerous clients facing harsh penalties for drug crimes. He possesses the knowledge and experience required to build a rock-solid defense. Speak with the Law Office of Michael Alarid III today to begin the process of protecting your freedom.

Below you will find a brief list of 10 different drug charges you can receive in the state of Arizona:

 Drug Use: If you are charged using a controlled substance in AZ that is not marijuana, it is classified as a class 4 felony under ARS §13-3407.

 Possession of Drugs: Possession of scheduled drugs can range from a misdemeanor to a felony depending upon the drug you possess, as well as the amount you are found with upon arrest.

 Distribution of Drugs: When it comes to this specific charge in AZ, your charge will depend on whether or not you were distributing narcotics, prescription drugs, or dangerous drugs. If you are charged with the distribution of dangerous drugs into the state, you will likely be facing felony charges.

 Drug Trafficking: If you are caught by law enforcement crossing the border of Arizona with illegal substances, you can be charged with drug trafficking, which will result in needing an attorney to minimize your incarceration time.

 Importation of Drugs: Drug importation in AZ is considered severe and can result in multiple years of prison .

 Possession of Drugs with Intent to Sell: Under Arizona laws, you can be charged with possession with intent to sell if you possess over 1 gram of heroin, 4 grams of PCP, 9 grams of methamphetamines, or two pounds of marijuana.

 Manufacturing of Dangerous Drugs: Manufacturing drugs is a serious crime and can result in maximum sentencing if your charges are aggravated. This charge is based on whether or not it is unbranded drugs, prescription drugs, dangerous drugs, or marijuana that is being manufactured.

 Cultivation of Drugs: In ARS §13-3405 (A)(3), it is stated that cultivating marijuana is considered a class 5 felony. Any felony conviction can carry a mandatory prison sentence for an individual arrest on the offense.

 Transportation of Drugs: Transporting illegal drugs from one place to another is a felony offense that could also be paired with a drug distribution charge, which is why a trial attorney is imperative.

 Drug Smuggling: Smuggling from Mexico to Arizona has become common and can result in felony and/or federal charges for the individual caught by law enforcement.

Possible Defenses for You and Your Drug Crimes Lawyer

After hiring a trial attorney, you can start to explore your options with various defenses related to your case against the state of Arizona. One defense, in particular, that is a common practice called a procedural defense. In this situation, your attorney will need to prove that the officer on the scene of your arrest had violated your constitutional rights while searching you, your vehicle, or your personal property. To prove this, they will need all police reports, bodycam footage, radio traffic, and other evidence from your arrest including pretrial interviews of the officers and witnesses.

Another defense that can be used is called entrapment. Entrapment is where an officer had asked you specifically to commit the crime or placed the idea in your head to commit the drug offense you are being charged with. In order to use this defense, you must fully admit to the charge and the crime you had committed on that specific date in time for your attorney to proceed with the entrapment.

Entrapment is where an officer had asked you specifically to commit the crime or placed the idea in your head

If the police used a confidential informant to aid in your arrest, your defense lawyer could build a case on the informant's credibility. To move forward with this defense, your attorney will need to collect evidence on the informant that proves that they are unreliable. This can be done by reading through police reports submitted by the department on that individual, which shows any questionable remarks on their criminal record.

Why is it Important to Hire A Defense Attorney for Your Drug Charge in Arizona?

When you are facing a drug charge in the state of Arizona, you will need a defense lawyer to help build your case. Your lawyer will be able to read through your case and quickly spot any questionable actions of the officer on duty, as well as any inconsistent remarks made by witnesses. By doing so, you could potentially get your charges dropped, or your sentence minimized.

All you need to do is contact a defense lawyer for a consultation on your case to start your path on building a solid case. They will be able to help you find the best defense for your situation while working with the prosecution on a possible plea deal if necessary. Just by having a skilled attorney defending your rights, such as Michael Alarid III, your chances of facing severe penalties are significantly reduced and entirely possibly even dismissed altogether.  Call The Law Office of Michael Alarid (602) 818-3110

Original Article -  https://www.alariddefense.com/drug-crimes-overview

Visit The Law Office of Michael Alarid in Phoenix Arizona

[tylerallenlawfirm-blog]

What are the Different Types of Criminal Traffic Violations?

When fighting an Arizona traffic ticket, it is important to hire a lawyer with the knowledge and experience to get you the best results. You need a team who understands your home state traffic regulations. Tyler Allen Law Firm’s team of attorneys and staff provide attentive and responsive representation for clients throughout the Arizona.

Tyler Allen Law Firm, PLLC 4201 North 24th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85016 602-456-0545 https://www.allenlawaz.com/areas-of-practice/civil-criminal-traffic-defense/criminal-traffic-violation-attorney/

[386newswest]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

pfigure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="1280" data-orig-src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2022/03/18/PPHX/72d452fc-05b3-4a2a-8aca-dd1627848948-accident_2.jpg"img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/2aae6545ebbe3e29e093ab44dc4915d9/107454ab4b4d6492-7f/s540x810/3e25adcd349ed9dce4de6e9ab8e9b8b82bdb3114.jpg" width="700" alt="image" style="text-align: center;" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="1280" data-orig-src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2022/03/18/PPHX/72d452fc-05b3-4a2a-8aca-dd1627848948-accident_2.jpg"//figurebr//ppPHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford./p pJudge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings./p p“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”/p pThe Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed./p pRodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019./p pSince the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count./p pJudge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion./p pA significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways./p pAccording to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”/p pThe judge ruled that omission was “critical.”/p p“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane./p pThis is critical./p pDet. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could have also avoided the collision,’ the jurors may not have found probable cause that a crime was committed and Defendant committed that crime.”/p pbr/Ryan-Touhill issued a similar rebuke to MCAO and Phoenix PD last year after ABC15 had exposed the two agencies colluded to falsely charge protesters as members of a made-up gang./p pbr/Jennifer Liewerbr/Communications Director/p pContact ABC15 Chief Investigator Dave Biscobing at ./p a href="https://thirdshorenews.tumblr.com/post/695099430881345536"https://thirdshorenews.tumblr.com/post/695099430881345536/a

[joltnews]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

img src="https://images.app.goo.gl/6Ajc5YMRyjrTbwvn9" width="700" align="center" /br /pPHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford./ppJudge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings./pp“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”/ppThe Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed./ppRodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019./ppSince the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count./ppJudge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion./ppA significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways./ppAccording to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”/ppThe judge ruled that omission was “critical.”/pp“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane./ppThis is critical./ppDet. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could have also avoided the collision,’ the jurors may not have found probable cause that a crime was committed and Defendant committed that crime.”/ppbr /Ryan-Touhill issued a similar rebuke to MCAO and Phoenix PD last year after ABC15 had exposed the two agencies colluded to falsely charge protesters as members of a made-up gang./ppbr /Jennifer Liewerbr /Communications Director/ppContact ABC15 Chief Investigator Dave Biscobing at ./pbr /br /a href="https://stillernewscompany.blogspot.com/2022/09/maricopa-county-judge-finds-police.html"https://stillernewscompany.blogspot.com/2022/09/maricopa-county-judge-finds-police.html/a

[aestranewsonline]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could have also avoided the collision,’ the jurors may not have found probable cause that a crime was committed and Defendant committed that crime.”

Ryan-Touhill issued a similar rebuke to MCAO and Phoenix PD last year after ABC15 had exposed the two agencies colluded to falsely charge protesters as members of a made-up gang.

Jennifer Liewer Communications Director

Contact ABC15 Chief Investigator Dave Biscobing at Dave@abc15.com.

Original Article https://www.abc15.com/news/local-news/investigations/maricopa-county-judge-finds-police-prosecutors-presented-unfair-biased-case-to-grand-jurors

...

[blogtalknews]

Phoenix DUI Lawyers Cheer Changes In DUI Laws

Being arrested for a DUI can be frightening for the majority of people. Numerous Arizonans charged with DUIs do not have any previous experience with the criminal justice system and do not know what may happen to them.

The knowledgeable Phoenix DUI Lawyers at Colburn Hintze Maletta can help you comprehend the charges you face and assist you through the process. We are aggressive criminal defense attorney who strive to secure the very best possible results for our customers.

We have actually detailed details about the various types of DUI charges, the charges, and proven reliable DUI defenses below.

What Is A Standard or Regular DUI?

A basic DUI in Arizona can be charged under Arizona Statute ARS 28-1381(A)( 1) or (A)( 2 ). Under the (A)( 1) statute, you can be charged with a routine DUI if you have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% to 0.149% within two hours of when the cops stopped you.

Additionally, even if your BAC is listed below 0.08%, you can be charged with a DUI if you are impaired to the smallest degree by drugs or alcohol while driving or having real physical control of your automobile.

When you receive your citation for a novice misdemeanor DUI, it is common to see both ARS 28-1381 (A)( 1) and ARS 28-1381 (A)( 2) noted.

Even if you are convicted of a very first standard DUI offense, the charges can be serious. A very first basic DUI conviction consists of a necessary minimum jail sentence of 10 days. However, if you complete an alcohol evaluation and classes, 9 out of the 10 days can be suspended.

Additionally, you can be put on probation for approximately 5 years if convicted of a novice standard DUI.

There are also minimum fines and assessments of $1,480, and your license can be suspended for a minimum of 90 days. You will have to install an ignition interlock device on your automobile from 6 months as much as one year and finish any alcohol classes that are purchased.

The Arizona MVD will examine 8 points versus your license and require you to finish a Traffic Survival School course if convicted of a regular DUI. A routine DUI charge can likewise include other expenses, consisting of auto insurance premium boosts, SR-22 insurance, car impoundment costs, jail expenses, and others.

https://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694881372942270466

[thevillagereporter]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could hhttps://markettalknews.tumblr.com/post/694858198584262656

[newscastonline]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could hhttps://markettalknews.tumblr.com/post/694858198584262656

[shirenewsonline]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could hhttps://businesspalnews.tumblr.com/post/694615069532848128

[newssummarywest]

Mesa DUI Attorneys Cheer Changes In Arizona DUI Laws

Being detained for a DUI can be frightening for most people. Many Arizonans charged with DUIs do not have any previous experience with the criminal justice system and do not understand what may happen to them.

The knowledgeable Phoenix DUI Attorney at Colburn Hintze Maletta can help you comprehend the charges you face and assist you through the procedure. We are aggressive criminal defense lawyers who strive to secure the very best possible outcomes for our clients.

We have actually detailed information about the various kinds of DUI charges, the penalties, and tested reliable DUI defenses below.

What Is A Standard or Routine DUI?

A basic DUI in Arizona can be charged under Arizona Statute ARS 28-1381(A)( 1) or (A)( 2 ). Under the (A)( 1) statute, you can be charged with a regular DUI if you have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% to 0.149% within two hours of when the authorities stopped you.

Furthermore, even if your BAC is listed below 0.08%, you can be charged with a DUI if you suffer to the slightest degree by drugs or alcohol while driving or having real physical control of your vehicle.

When you receive your citation for a first-time misdemeanor DUI, it is common to see both ARS 28-1381 (A)( 1) and ARS 28-1381 (A)( 2) listed.

Even if you are founded guilty of a first basic DUI offense, the charges can be extreme. A first standard DUI conviction consists of an obligatory minimum jail sentence of 10 days. Nevertheless, if you finish an alcohol evaluation and classes, 9 out of the 10 days can be suspended.

In addition, you can be put on probation for up to 5 years if convicted of a newbie basic DUI.

There are also minimum fines and evaluations of $1,480, and your license can be suspended for at least 90 days. You will have to install an ignition interlock gadget on your cars and truck from six months as much as one year and complete any alcohol classes that are purchased.

The Arizona MVD will evaluate 8 points versus your license and need you to finish a Traffic Survival School course if convicted of a regular DUI. A routine DUI charge can also involve other expenses, including auto insurance premium increases, SR-22 insurance coverage, lorry impoundment fees, jail costs, and others.

https://voxpopnews.us/post/694859915825676288