#Family Attorney Utah

[probablygayattorneys]

So, a fun little fact about me is that I name things. My phone, for instance, is named Sadie. My laptop? Lucy. My switch? Robinette. This includes cars. My last car was named Amethyst, and the one before that was called Missy May (short for Missile Launcher Mayonnaise).

Now a less than fun fact is that I’ve been having a lot of car problems lately and for the past few weeks or so have been without a car. However, today that has finally been resolved and I have a functional car! Its name… the Badgermobile. Why, you ask?

Well first, let me show you the key.

Now let me show you what you see if you open the little drawer on the center console.

And finally… what you see if you’re behind me in traffic.

Long live the Badgermobile!

[jamesadams0003]

Drug Addiction and Child Custody: Safeguarding Your Rights and Your Child's Well-being

Drug addiction can have significant implications on child custody battles, creating complex legal and emotional challenges for parents. If you are facing such a situation, it's essential to understand your rights and take steps to protect both yourself and your child. A parental rights attorney in St. George, Utah, can provide the legal guidance and support you need during this difficult time.

Parental rights lawyers in St. George, Utah specialize in navigating the complexities of family law, particularly in cases involving drug addiction and child custody. These legal professionals have the expertise to help you safeguard your parental rights and prioritize your child's well-being. By seeking their assistance, you can ensure that your rights are protected and that the best interests of your child are taken into account.

Here are some key steps to take when navigating drug addiction and child custody issues:

1. Seek Legal Counsel: Consulting with a parental rights attorney in St. George, Utah, is crucial in understanding the legal aspects of your situation. Your lawyer will assess your case, provide personalized advice, and represent your interests in court.

2. Prioritize Your Child's Well-being: It's essential to demonstrate your commitment to ensuring a safe and stable environment for your child. This may involve seeking treatment for addiction, demonstrating progress and stability, and creating a supportive environment for your child.

3. Gather Evidence: Your attorney can assist you in gathering evidence to support your case, such as documentation of your efforts to address the addiction, testimony from reliable witnesses, and any relevant medical or legal records.

4. Develop a Co-Parenting Plan: Working with your attorney, develop a co-parenting plan that outlines how you will prioritize your child's best interests and address any concerns related to the addiction. This plan can demonstrate your dedication to being a responsible and caring parent. By working with a knowledgeable parental rights attorney in St. George, Utah, you can navigate the legal complexities of drug addiction and child custody, while prioritizing your child's well-being.

[andresmejerlaw]

Explore the various facets of "Types of Domestic Violence Abuse" with the expertise of Boyack Christiansen Legal Solutions. Uncover the nuances and categories of domestic violence abuse, from emotional and psychological to physical and financial abuse. For more information on protecting your rights and seeking assistance, call us today at 435-375-3959.

[utahlegalteam]

Family Law Attorneys Spanish Fork, Utah

Utah Legal Team’s experienced family law attorneys Spanish Fork, Utah have the compassion and level head you need to successfully negotiate your case. Family law cases are tough for everyone involved. Our elite attorneys are here to make this process as quick and painless for you as possible .Contact us NOW and take the right step towards securing your future.

[madisonsmithutah]

Family Trust as a Business Planning Tool

How Can You Use a Family Trust as a Business Planning Tool?

A family trust is a legal arrangement in which a person, called the settlor, transfers assets to a trustee to hold and manage for the benefit of specified beneficiaries. Family trusts are often used as a way to manage, protect, and distribute wealth within a family. They can also be useful for business planning, providing various benefits to business owners and their families.

Benefits of Using a Family Trust for Business Planning

Asset protection: A family trust can protect a business's assets in the event of legal action, bankruptcy, or other financial challenges. The trust's assets are separate from the business owner's personal assets, which can provide an additional layer of protection.

Tax benefits: A family trust can provide tax benefits for a business, such as the ability to distribute income to family members in lower tax brackets and potentially reduce the overall tax burden of the business.

Succession planning: A family trust can be used to plan for the succession of a business, allowing for a smooth transition of ownership and management to the next generation. It can also be used to ensure that the business remains in the family and is not sold to outsiders.

Flexibility: A family trust can be structured in a way that provides flexibility and can be adapted to changing circumstances. For example, the terms of the trust can be modified to accommodate new beneficiaries or to address changing financial needs.

Considerations When Using a Family Trust for Business Planning

Legal requirements: Setting up a family trust involves following specific legal requirements, including appointing trustees and preparing a trust deed. It is important to consult with a lawyer or financial advisor to ensure that the trust is properly set up and administered.

Ongoing administration: A family trust requires ongoing administration, including the management of assets, tax compliance, and reporting to beneficiaries. This can be time-consuming and may require the assistance of a professional trustee or financial advisor.

Potential conflicts: A family trust may create potential conflicts among family members, particularly if there are different expectations or misunderstandings about the trust's purpose and terms. Communicating clearly and openly with all parties is important to avoid misunderstandings and conflicts.

Family Trust Attorney Free Consultation In Utah

If you need legal help, call this law firm and talk with our experienced attorneys about family trust for a FREE consultation.

We help you with Estate Planning, Wills, Trusts, Power of Attorney, Health Care Directive, Estate Administration, Probate and More

Parklin Law - Estate Planning

5772 W 8030 S, # N206

West Jordan UT 84081

(801) 618-0699

40.605070, -112.027530

Disclaimer: This is not legal advice and is simply an answer to a question and that if legal advice is sought to contact a licensed attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction.

[ascentlawllc]

Child Support in a Prenuptial Agreement

Can you ask for child support in a prenuptial agreement?

A prenuptial agreement, commonly known as a prenup, is a legal contract that two individuals enter before marriage. The purpose of a prenup is to establish the terms and conditions of the couple's property and financial responsibilities in the event of a divorce or death.

One common question when discussing prenups is whether or not it is possible to include provisions for child support in the agreement. The answer is yes. It is possible to include provisions for child support in a prenup.

Provisions for Child Support

In fact, many prenups include provisions for child support and other important matters such as spousal support and the division of property. This can be a useful way for couples to establish clear expectations and avoid potential conflicts.

However, it is important to note that the provisions for child support in a prenup are not enforceable by law. This means that if a couple were to divorce and one party were to seek child support, the court would not be bound by the terms of the prenup.

Instead, the court would determine the appropriate amount of child support based on the case's individual circumstances, using guidelines set forth by state law. This is to ensure that the child's best interests are taken into account.

Overall, while it is possible to include provisions for child support in a prenup, these provisions are not enforceable by law, and the court will ultimately make the final decision on the matter. It is always a good idea to consult with an experienced family law attorney when drafting a prenup to ensure that all of the necessary provisions are included and properly executed.

Family Law Attorney Free Consultation

If you are looking for a legal advice about family law or in need an attorney, call this law firm for free consultation. We have the Best Attorneys in Utah.

Ascent Law LLC

8833 S Redwood Road Suite C

West Jordan UT 84088

(801) 676-5506

https://www.ascentlawfirm.com

http://divorceinutah.xyz/child-support-in-a-prenuptial-agreement/

Disclaimer: This is not legal advice and is simply an answer to a question and that if legal advice is sought to contact a licensed attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction.

[brindleysullivan]

If you are facing a divorce, have child custody troubles, are wanting to adopt a child, or need a trust or will prepared, our family law attorney st george utah can help you right away. We offer a free consultation to those who are struggling with stressful situations.

[mariacallous]

https://factkeepers com/trump-was-utterly-indifferent-to-the-public-interest-in-his-first-term/

The Revolving Door Project on Monday released a set of reports on corruption and mismanagement in executive agencies during the Trump presidency, calling on the media to focus on presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump’s poor governing record as he campaigns to retake the Oval Office.

The new reports, called “retrospective memos,” show that Trump’s executive branch was rife with cronyism and corporate influence from 2017 until 2021. RDP, a watchdog group focused on the executive branch, released the reports as a way to fight “Trumpnesia” and focus the political discussion on the governance records of Trump and President Joe Biden, a Democrat seeking reelection.

“Donald Trump’s most important legacy as president wasn’t what he said, or even what bills he signed, but how he turned the federal government into a favor machine to benefit his family and cronies,” Jeff Hauser, RDP’s executive director, said in a statement. “The media should not focus on the aesthetics of this week’s presidential debate but rather cover the Biden vs. Trump election as a comparison between how each president administered the immensely important executive branch.”

“It’s important to revisit how poorly he ran the executive branch his first time round.”

RDP issued eight memos, covering disaster management, the environment, financial regulation, housing, immigration, labor, education, and transportation.

Each provides evidence of a Trump administration that was “utterly indifferent to the public interest,” as Timi Iwayemi, RDP’s research director, said in the statement.

In many cases, Trump appointees were hostile to the original aims of the agencies they served.

Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s choice to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, tried to roll back rules limiting predatory payday lending—a practice that “preys on the working poor,” the financial regulation memo says.

Mulvaney—who’s now suggesting a “revenge-a-thon” against Trump’s foes—also appointed political cronies and failed to undertake the enforcement actions against companies that were the CFPB’s raison d’être. A 2019 feature in The New York Times Magazine was titled, “Mick Mulvaney’s Master Class in Destroying a Bureaucracy From Within.”

Trump’s National Labor Relations Board was led by Peter Robb, a management-side lawyer who was the Reagan administration’s lead attorney on litigation dealing with the air traffic controllers’ strike of 1981, in which the federal government fired about 11,000 workers and banned them from being rehired. Like Trump’s Department of Labor, which was ultimately run by the son of former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the NLRB under Robb was pro-management—and reportedly dysfunctional.

Other federal agencies were hardly more committed to serving the public interest in the late 2010s.

“Trump’s Interior Department advanced the interests of extractivist industry on public lands while refusing to account for how its actions would worsen climate change,” according to RDP’s environment memo. “The Trump administration auctioned off over 10 million acres of land and water to oil and gas drilling, including by drastically reducing the size of national monuments like Bears Ears in Utah, a sacred homeland to five tribal nations, in order to open them up to development.”

The Department of Housing and Urban Development, run by former presidential candidate Ben Carson, was plagued by “handouts to friends and family,” a series of “deadly budget cut proposals,” and a “war on fair housing,” according to the RDP’s housing memo.

Trump’s disaster management choices were particularly consequential. The Federal Emergency Management Agency ” horrifically” mismanaged the response to two consecutive hurricanes that hit Puerto Rico in 2017, which got minimal—and very delayed—relief compared to Texas communities that were hit by a hurricane during that period.

RDP’s catalog of Trump administration failures is designed to clarify the stakes of the 2024 election.

“The series serves as a reminder to the public that the president’s primary responsibility is to direct the vast apparatus known as the executive branch of the federal government,” RDP said. “Sadly, former president Donald Trump either neglected this responsibility or wielded it in favor of corporations throughout his four years in office.”

Iwayemi said “Even as current conversations wisely focus on Project 2025 and Trump’s promise to leverage executive power to harm political enemies, it’s important to revisit how poorly he ran the executive branch his first time round as a cure to the public’s apparent Trumpnesia.”

[offender42085]

Post 987

...The case took a wrong turn when charges were filed against a couple who stumbled upon the burglars when they came to the house to bring the murdered man a pecan pie.....

Martin Cameron Bond, Utah inmate 211601, born 1989. incarceration intake in 2013 at age 25, sentenced to life

Murder

In March 2013, Martin Cameron Bond knew his sentence before he walked into American Fork's 4th District courthouse: life without the possibility of parole.

He had agreed to the sentence to escape the death penalty in the event a jury found him guilty of aggravated murder in the 2009 death of retired Brigham Young University professor Kay Mortensen. That jury verdict came on Jan. 18, 2013. 

But the stipulation didn't stop the 25-year-old from asking 4th District Judge Thomas Low to sentence him to 25 years to life, which offered the possibility of parole.

"I don't use drugs, I don't drink," said the shackled killer, dressed in a red jumpsuit. "I don't use tobacco products... I always thought Corrections was for rehabilitation."

Bond asked the judge to allow the parole board to determine whether he was "worthy of a second chance." But Low said his hands were tied and sentenced Bond to spend the rest of his life in the Utah State Prison.

"Fair enough, your honor," Bond said before being led back into a holding cell. "Thank you."

Prosecutors have said Bond and an accomplice, Benjamin David Rettig (Utah inmate 203136), killed Mortensen to get the cache of guns he kept in his Payson home. The professor was found kneeling over his bathtub, his throat cut, a stab wound in his neck.

The case initially took a wrong turn when charges were filed against Roger Mortensen and his wife, Pamela Mortensen, who stumbled upon the burglars when they came to the house to bring Mortensen a pecan pie.

The couple were tied up but eventually freed themselves and called for help when they found Mortensen's body. Police initially didn't believe their story, however, and the couple were held in jail for five months and indicted by a grand jury before Bond's ex-wife tipped police.

Rettig — who is serving 25 years to life in prison — pleaded guilty in 2011 to aggravated murder and aggravated kidnapping for his part in the slaying. Bond was found guilty of aggravated murder, three counts of aggravated kidnapping, and one count each of aggravated burglary and aggravated robbery.

Bond apologized to Mortensen's family, calling the murder "a horrible tragedy that shouldn't have occurred."

Emotions remain volatile among some of Pamela and Roger Mortensen's friends and family, who are still upset over the couple's arrest and say the grand jury system needs to be revamped. Donna Rissinger, Pamela Mortensen's mother, told media reporters that the couple has never received restitution for the wrongful arrests, although they had to pay for attorneys and their cars were repossessed.

Deputy Utah County Attorney Tim Taylor said the decision to arrest the couple was based on evidence they had at the time.

"When you go back three years ago, we thought we were making the right decision," Taylor said.

3u

[bad-lobcorp-aus]

Can i actually aubmit my. Lobcorp modern au im thinking too much ahout to the point im making DESIGNS for it.

SO.

lobcorp was an mlm ran by an exmormon from utah (carmen) headquarted in nyc. The mlm was widespread but only a few specific college or highschool students (the sefirot) truly knew the true nature of it. Maybe the mlm would be like psychological? Like a betterhelp-esque scandle sjit? Or mahbe like vitamins and all. Few years later quixote and meursault are attorneys who recruit witnesses of the mlm (the sinners) as testimonies for the court case. Ayin was also a ceo of the mlm but he literally just fucking cheated on benjamin and left him and angela and whilst angela and benjamin are in a whole other state ayij is leading a cult.

Then she’s finally gojng to college and. “Congratulations your father died and now you own the property of Seed Of Light Co.” so she then decides ro work on a case study regarding the cult which is how she meets the sefirot. Carmen was raised mormon, moved to nyc when she was 8 and became a scientologist as an adult.

Some of the thjngs in the court case could be like “faust is working for a laboratort and thinks these drugs are extremely unsafe” “ishmael’s coworkers blowed like 700 dollars on these shitass pills” “kromer was a twitch streamer and promoted the mlm products and kromer also had her followers swat sinclair for tje sole basis that he is jewish”…

When carmen moves to nyc she befriends giovanni despite him not being mormon like her family (adoptive family is catholic but giovanni is ethnically jewish) think gio would be half italian half eritrean

Theres so much more than this lmfao like. Test tube baby + disabled angela to explain how much she dehumanizes herslef but like.

this falls under rule 5, you've put too much thought into it for it to be a bad au, but you should definitely elaborate on it on your own blog :O

[saintgeorgelaw]

Need legal help with your business? Our St George Business Law Attorneys can help! Call with our experienced St George Utah lawyers today.  For more  information contact our St George lawyer and call us today at 435-375-3959. 

[jamesadams0003]

Family Law Lawyers St George Utah  | Turner Law

Discover the key to safeguarding your assets during divorce with the expertise of a trusted Family Law Attorney. Click the link to learn more about how they can assist you in navigating the complexities of property division. Don't let your hard-earned assets slip away - take control of your financial future today!

[planetofsnarfs]

Former mommy vlogger Ruby Franke once said, in one of her many, many mommy vlogs, that she would never accept being “canceled,” and anyone who didn’t like the way she treated her children just hated “responsibility.” 

Yesterday, a judge sentenced Franke, who pleaded guilty to four counts of child abuse this past December, to one to 15 years for each count, to be served consecutively. The Utah Board of Pardons and Parole will determine the exact amount of time she will serve, though it will not be more than 30 years as that is the maximum allowed for consecutive sentences in the state. 

Some might say that’s a little more than “canceled.”

Ruby Franke, like many Mormon ladies in Utah, had a family YouTube vlog documenting every day of her life with her husband and six children and dispensing parenting advice. It was called “8 Passengers” and it was hugely popular among the kinds of people who watch family vlogs. How huge? Two and a half million followers huge. 

Then, one day, she bragged in a video about how her daughter Eve’s kindergarten teacher texted her to tell her that she didn’t have any lunch, and could Ruby please come bring her one, whereupon Ruby informed the teacher that it was Eve’s responsibility to pack her own lunch, and if she didn’t have any she would just have to go hungry. Ruby added that she hoped no one gave her daughter anything to eat. 

This got a lot of traction outside her usual audience of family vlogger fans, from people who didn’t think it’s actually great parenting to starve children. 

Not long after that, she recorded a video with her son Chad who revealed that, a month after he came home from a “wilderness camp” for troubled teens (which sounds a lot like that horrifying one Paris Hilton was sent to), he played a silly prank on his little brother, waking him up and telling him to pack his things because they were all going to Disneyland. His punishment? He wasn’t allowed to have a bed for the next seven months and had to sleep on a bean bag. 

Ruby laughed and laughed the entire time like what she did was real cute. 

This didn’t go over well with viewers, and eventually someone started a Change.org petition to demand that the Utah Department of Child and Family Services do a welfare check. They started calling as well, and eventually they checked on the Frankes and, well, didn’t do jack shit. While they didn’t do anything, 90 percent of Franke’s sponsors on her YouTube channel did. They left.

It was at this point that Franke started portraying herself as a Good Conservative Mom who was being canceled by Bad Liberals Who Hate Responsibility.

“The reason we got canceled was because I was demonstrating, as I have done from day one, what a responsible mother looks like,” she said in a 2021 interview with The Wrap. “And it scared the living bejesus out of these kids who do not want to be held accountable. So that is the motive for the hate being thrown at me. I’m the antidote to their acting out, and they know it.”

Yeah, either that or they figured — correctly — that if this is what this woman thought was okay to put on camera, that whatever was happening off-camera was 10 times worse, or at least had the potential to get there. 

Eventually she abandoned family vlogging in favor of family counseling and joined forces with Jodi Hildebrandt, who was also charged in connection with this case. No one heard much about her until Franke’s 12-year-old son escaped Hildebrandt’s home (where he was staying) and ran to a neighbor for help, emaciated and covered in wounds and duct tape. 

Police arrested Franke, and not for the crime of being a responsible mother.

Via New York Times:

From May to August 2023, Ms. Franke, a mother of six, created a “concentration camp-like setting” for two of her children, who were 9 and 11 at the time, Eric Clarke, the Washington County attorney, said during the sentencing hearing. She regularly denied them adequate food, water, entertainment and beds, and isolated them from others, he said. Ms. Franke, 42, also forced her children to do physical tasks in extreme heat, without shoes, socks or water, Mr. Clarke said. They were forced to stand on hot concrete in the summer heat for hours and sometimes days at a time, he added, and were beaten and regularly bound by their hands and feet. The injuries were so severe that the children required hospitalization.

If you’re wondering where the duct tape came in, it is because Hildebrandt and Franke “treated” the areas from where they were handcuffed and legcuffed with “homeopathic remedies” and then wrapped them in duct tape. 

Franke later revealed in court that she also believed that her children were “possessed” and that extreme discipline was the only thing that could save them. this was a belief, she said, she got from Hildebrandt. Indeed, much of her court statement involved blaming Hildebrandt for more or less brainwashing her into believing that child abuse was what her kids needed. 

Hildebrandt is her own kind of monster, so this would be believable if not for everything else Franke thought was a great idea before May of 2023. So much for all that accountability she once loved so much.

It is possible that if, instead of assuming Franke was being “cancel cultured” for “demonstrating … what a responsible mother looks like,” the police and DCFS actually took the complaints seriously in the first place, those kids never would have been hospitalized or otherwise further traumatized. Wouldn’t that have been nice?

[circularsidewalks]

No one believed her; what did she have to lose? The detectives had told her the evidence they had was overwhelming and pointed to her as a murderess; she knew she was not. The detectives convinced her she was there and had been responsible for Travis death. As days, then weeks, then months, then years went by there was no one willing to listen to her; not even her attorneys appointed by the Court would believe her. No one investigated her trip to Utah. No one looked at the Pictures. Her family was standing by her, but even they seemed to have resigned themselves to The Story she began to tell in Yreka to the Detectives Flores and Blane. The Story she began to tell out of panic and frustration was changed ultimately. The Story became a full-fledged admission. The Story became one the Defense Attorneys felt comfortable with, not the truth; the Defense Attorneys were wrong, and the story was a LIE.

Jodi Arias's False Confession - Trial By Pictures

[madisonsmithutah]

Prenuptial & Postnuptial

What is the difference between prenups and postnups?

A prenup is a legal contract signed before the wedding that lays out how you plan to divide your assets in case of a divorce. A postnuptial agreement (or postnup) is an agreement signed after the wedding that works like a prenup, except it's signed after you're already married and at the time of your choosing.

You might have heard people call them "prenups" when they really mean postnups. There's a reason for that: The term "prenup" is so common that it's abbreviated as just "the prenup." It's also more common to sign a prenup than a postnup, especially if you're getting married without any assets or children.

Prenups and postnups are similar in many ways, but there are some important differences between them. Before making either one, it's important to understand what each one does and why you'd want to make one—or not.

Prenups and postnups are both tools for solidifying the financial aspects of a marriage.

It covers a variety of topics and is extremely customizable. The most common reason for getting a prenup or postnup is if one person in the relationship has significantly more assets than the other—particularly if there are children from previous marriages or significant debt that needs to be taken care of. One partner might be worried about being left with nothing in the event of a divorce, while the other partner is concerned about taking on too much responsibility.

Prenups and postnups can also be used to ensure that both parties' wishes are followed in regard to things like child custody and spousal support. In addition, they can be used to draft an agreement on how the couple plans to handle their finances.

Family Law Attorney Free Consultation

If you have any questions or in need a Family Law Attorney, we have the Best Attorneys in Utah. Please call this law firm for free consultation.

We help you with Estate Planning, Wills, Trusts, Power of Attorney, Health Care Directive, Estate Administration, Probate and More

Parklin Law - Estate Planning

5772 W 8030 S, # N206

West Jordan UT 84081

(801) 618-0699

40.605070, -112.027530

Disclaimer: This is not legal advice and is simply an answer to a question and that if legal advice is sought to contact a licensed attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction.