#Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

packedwithpackards · 2 years

Text

The family tree of David Packard, co-founder of Hewlett-Packard (HP)

Photograph of David Packard, used under fair use exemption to copyright law.

On January 1, 1939, David Packard and his business partner, and friend, William Redington Hewlett formed their company in a Palto Alto garage, that would become Hewlett-Packard or HP. Eventually the company would become a well-known computer and IT company in Silicon Valley, splitting off into HP Inc. (for personal computers and printers) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (enterprise and services business) in November 2015. But who was David Packard, and who were his parents?

According to his obituary, he was born to an attorney and a "Pueblo high school teacher" in Pueblo, Colorado on September 7, 1912. Other summaries of his life also do not name his parents, only making a reference to his father being a bankruptcy referee during the Great Depression, allowing him to pay for tuition for his son at Stanford University. [1] Even the Packard Humanities Institute, founded by David, has nothing to say about his early life. His last will and testament makes clear he not only had a foundation but was married to Luclle Salter and had four children (also see here).

In order to determine the names of his parents, I turned to Family Search. Of course their were entries in the United States, GenealogyBank Obituaries, 1980-2014, California Death Index, 1940-1997, and United States Public Records, 1970-2009, but these didn't help. An entry on a Family Tree, on Family Search, claimed his parents were Sperry Sidney Packard and Ella Loona Garber. Further sourcing showed this to be the case, and be correct.

The 1910 U.S. Federal Census, shows a woman named Anna Garber in the household of Sperry and Ella, making it clear that Sperry's wife (and David's mother) has the surname of Garber. [2] At the time of the census, the Packard family is living in Pueblo Ward 1, Pueblo, Colorado:

See yellow outlining of the Packard family by this author. Robert died in 1911, one year later.

By 1920, the family is still living in Pueblo, Pueblo, Colorado. However, at this time, David Packard, later the co-founder of Hewlett Packard is in the household. [3] This proves that his parents are Sperry Sidney Packard and Ella Loona Garber. He also has a sister named Anna Louise (who lived until 1935) in the household:

See yellow outlining of the Packard family by this author.

Ten years later, in 1930, David was still living in the household. [4] He was with his sister Anna and parents in Pueblo, Pueblo, Colorado, United States. As for his David's mother, Ella Graber, we have a marriage index showing that she married Sperry Sidney Packard on 25 Jun 1909. [5] Other records, on this page, indicate she was born in Mt. Eaton, Wayne County, Ohio.

More important is his father, Sperry Sidney Packard, in order to determine the Packard family lineage. We know, from Sperry's WWI draft card, that he was born on February 26, 1880, somewhere in the U.S. [6] From the above censuses, that somewhere is apparently Illinois, as he says his father was born in Illinois and mother in Ohio. A clue to his parentage is not in the 1900 census which lists two men named Sperry Packard in Pueblo, Colorado (but in different wards) and born in February 1880, but the 1880 U.S. Federal Census itself. [7]

While he is called "Perry S" in the Family Search transcription of the census, it is clear it is him. The Packard family is living in Ashkum, Iroquois, Illinois, with his parents as his father Sidney Packard (said to be born in New York) and mother, Jenny. He also has a brother George E. and another named Henry F.

With yellow outlining of the Packard family by this author.

His Find A Grave memorial confirms this, saying his parents are Sidney Malcolm Packard (1845-1927) and Mary Jane Hayden (1849-1905). The only record I can find earlier than the 1880 census is marriage record of Sidney and Mary in Iroquois, Illinois, United States. [8] Due to the amount of media in this post already, I'm not going to thumb through the film to find it at this point.

Going even further, the entry for Sidney says his father is Malcolm Packard, who lived from 1818 to 1903. We know, from an Illinois marriage record, that Malcolm was married to a woman named Nancy Seaton, although the date of their marriage is unclear. [9] Still, this confirms that Sidney's father is Malcolm, along with the 1880 census noted above.

Then, we come to the entry for Malcolm, in Find A Grave. It says says his father is Rev Jonas Fuller Packard, who lived from 1786 to 1859. Now, we know that the Packard family is living in Parishville, St. Lawrence, New York in 1850. [10] The household is headed by Jonas F (undeniably Fuller) Packard and his wife Prudence, both of whom are born in Vermont, with seven children. Sadly, Malcolm is not in the household. Perhaps this is because he would have been 32 in 1850, and the oldest person in the household is 28.

Yellow outlining of the Packard family by this author

Beyond this, the 1855 Illinois State Census notes that a Malcolm is living in West Chicago, Ward 05, Cook, Illinois (possibly the same as the Malcolm in New York in 1850). [11] We also know that the 82-year-old Malcolm Packard was living in Overton, Pueblo, Colorado in 1900, noting that he was born in September 1818, living with another Packard family, with the census saying that Malcolm is a "cousin." Also, it is known that twenty years earlier Malcolm is living in Seward, Winnebago, Illinois with the Seaton family, the family of his wife, Nancy. [12]

The question remains: are Jonas Fuller Packard and Prudence (reportedly has maiden name of Jaeger) the parents of Malcolm Packard? Sadly, we cannot tell without further research, as censuses for the siblings of Malcolm do not mention him in the household at all, from what we can find. [13] However, we can find him in the 1850 census. In that census, he is married to a woman named Nancy and a son named Sidney is in the household, living in Seward, Winnebago, Illinois. [14] This is a confirmation that Sidney Malcolm Packard is a son of Malcolm and Nancy without a doubt. It also confirms that Nancy's maiden name is Seaton as the Packards are living in the Seaton household.

Yellow outlining was put in by this author

For the sake of argument (since I can't find any records within the New York, Wills and Probate Records, 1659-1999 database for Jonas or within the Illinois, Wills and Probate Records, 1772-1999 for Prudence since she died in Illinois in the 1880s), lets say that Jonas Fuller Packard and Prudence were Malcolm's father. We know that Jonas was living in Keene, Essex, New York in 1820 and in Parishville, St Lawrence, New York in 1840. [15] Now, the Find A Grave entry for Jonas says his father is Pvt. Abisha Packard, who lived from 1761 to 1836.

There are some records for Abisha Packard. We know that he died in July 1836 (from his Find A Grave entry), and that he served in Massachusetts as a private during the Revolutionary War, with his father asserted as Eleazer Packard. [16] Additionally, we know that Abisha was in Charlotte, Chittenden, Vermont in 1810, and Madrid, Saint Lawrence, New York in 1820, receiving a pension in Vermont, for his previous military service, as late as May 1818. It is clear that he received a federal pension as his name is within the "U.S., Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files, 1800-1900" collection on Ancestry.

The pension itself, classified as a Widow's Pension Application File by Ancestry, notes his military service as a private (since he applied before his death) and that his wife re-applied after his death in 1843. [17] As required, Abisha outlines his military service, that he moved from Vermont to New York by the time he applied, in 1832, In his wife's statement, she notes that Abisha died on July 20, 1836, and outlined that, yes, Jonas F. Packard is a son of Abisha and his 1st wife! It mainly talks about Jonas getting the old bible while they bought a replacement bible to store family info:

So, that generational linkage of Abisha and Jonas is solid. Next pages just say that Abisha married Rebecca. Another Packard, a son of Abisha and Rebecca, confirms the story about the family bible from his memory:

Then we get the actual pages from the bible itself! They show that Jonas F. was undoubtedly the son of Abisha and his wife Esther:

Finally, this is all confirmed by the letter from the commissioner of pensions in 1929, noting that Abisha married Esther, who lived from 1767 to 1790, then in Charlotte, a second time (in 1793) to Rebecca or Rebekah, born in 1774. It also notes that with Esther he had three children: Jonas F. (b. Sept 10, 1786), Mary (1788), and Abisha (b. Jun 28, 1789). With his second wife, Rebecca, he had six children: Allen (b. 1794), Truman (b. 1797), Esther (b. 1799), Daniel (b. 1802), George (b. 1803), and Hiram (b. 1807). All of these are noted in the above page from the family bible.

Now, Abisha's Find A Grave entry says that his father is Eleazer Packard (1727-1803) and Mercy Richards, even as Abisha's federal pension does not mention his father. We know that Eleazer is noted as the father in the Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915 database on Family Search. [18] We also know that Eleazer died in February 1803. Unfortunately, this is where, like the father of Malcolm Packard, the records are thin. There is a Eleazer Packard probate in Franklin County, with an administration bond in 1815 listing the children. However, he died in Plainfield, a town then in Hampshire County, Massachusetts. [19] So, this is likely not our Eleazer. One note, on Eleazer's entry on Family Search says "Parentage for Eleazer found on WFT CD # 5, Pedigree # 2126." Basically, they are depending on a family tree, which is always risky and not worth it to do.

However, once again, for the sake of argument, lets say that his parents are who it says on Find A Grave. From there, we move onto Eleazer's entry. His entry asserts that his parents are Zaccheus Packard II (1693-1775) and Mercy Alden (1697-1777). Unfortunately, Zaccheus did not appear within the "Massachusetts, Wills and Probate Records, 1635-1991" database. Of course, his wife isn't either, with a Mercy H Packard in probate in Franklin, Massachusetts but that's it. So, this is again, shaky. I looked through the index of probates for Massachusetts, Wills and Probate Records, 1635-1991 on Ancestry and found the following results for Packards:

And there was a result for a Zaccheus, the father of Zaccheus II. I get this from the fact that on Find A Grave Zaccheus II's parents are noted as Zaccheus Packard I (1651-1723) and Sarah Howard (1648-1703).

So I was going to look at book 5, pages 72-75. Unfortunately it wasn't on the version of Ancestry I was using. So, I looked on Family Search, of course, for these probate records. I did try to look at Massachusetts, Plymouth County, Probate Estate Files, 1686-1915 but this was just a bunch of case files. I finally found it in another collection.

At last but not least, was Zaccheus's probate. It noted that a Jonathan Packard was the son of Zaccheus, and that Isaac Winslow was the judge of probate, including of Zaccheus's inventory. [19] Most importantly, however, was the page which listed Zaccheus's son of the same name, in the distribution of the estate since his father died intestate (without a will):

I mean, we even have a page with Zaccheus's signature (or his mark noted above), so he is definitely a son. Hence, the connection of the two Zaccheus individuals. I know, if I remember correctly, from the Packard family history I wrote and my own research, that Zaccheus had a son of the same name. From there, it is clear that the well-known Samuel Packard, Sr. and Elizabeth X (X used as a stand-in for her actual maiden name) are his parents because Zaccheus I is mentioned in Samuel's will.

So, more research could be done on his lineage, but you could say that it is a strong likelihood that David Packard is the descendant of Samuel Packard, Sr., along with certain generations definitely connected, while others are only weakly connected.

Notes

[1] Also see this summary, this page on his life, this page, obit in the New York Times, Encyclopaedia Brittanica entry, a page on the MBARI website, article in a Palto Alto newspaper, obit in the Independent, another Times article, and summary on the Edison Tech Center website.

[2] "United States Census, 1910," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MK4N-P45 : accessed 6 January 2018), Sperry S Packard, Pueblo Ward 1, Pueblo, Colorado, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) ED 153, sheet 7A, family 153, NARA microfilm publication T624 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1982), roll 124; FHL microfilm 1,374,137.

[3] "United States Census, 1920," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MXLC-DSL : accessed 6 January 2018), Ann Louise Packard in household of Sperry S Packard, Pueblo, Pueblo, Colorado, United States; citing ED 204, sheet 5A, line 31, family 111, NARA microfilm publication T625 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1992), roll 170; FHL microfilm 1,820,170.

[4] "United States Census, 1930," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X74V-KVS : accessed 6 January 2018), Anne L Packard in household of Sperry S Packard, Pueblo, Pueblo, Colorado, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) ED 1, sheet 5A, line 42, family 134, NARA microfilm publication T626 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 2002), roll 249; FHL microfilm 2,339,984.

[5] "Colorado Statewide Marriage Index, 1853-2006," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KNQJ-4SV : 10 December 2017), Sperry Sidney Packard and Ella Loona Graber, 25 Jun 1909, Colorado Springs, El Paso, Colorado, United States; citing no. 5232, State Archives, Denver; FHL microfilm 1,690,117; "Ohio, County Births, 1841-2003," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VRMB-854 : 22 December 2016), Ella Graber, 13 Sep 1880; citing Birth, Mt. Eaton, Wayne, Ohio, United States, county courthouses, Ohio; FHL microfilm 475,466; "Ohio Births and Christenings, 1821-1962," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X6YJ-8G6 : 8 December 2014), Ella Graber, 13 Sep 1880; citing , WAYNE, OHIO, reference 2:GPLMSJ; FHL microfilm 475,466.

[6] "United States World War I Draft Registration Cards, 1917-1918," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KZKD-8WS : 12 December 2014), Sperry Sidney Packard, 1917-1918; citing Pueblo City no 1, Colorado, United States, NARA microfilm publication M1509 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.); FHL microfilm 1,561,788.

[7] "United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MXJR-Q2R : 22 August 2017), Perry S Packard in household of Sidney Packard, Ashkum, Iroquois, Illinois, United States; citing enumeration district ED 122, sheet 56A, NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 0213; FHL microfilm 1,254,213.

[8] "Illinois, County Marriages, 1810-1940," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KF2M-XNY : 27 September 2017), Sidney M. Packard and Mary J. Hayden, 12 Nov 1872; citing Iroquois, Illinois, United States, county offices, Illinois; FHL microfilm 1,321,548.

[9] "Illinois, County Marriages, 1810-1940," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QK9L-K4YZ : 17 October 2017), Malcom Packard in entry for Dell Gallino and Nelia Seaton, 24 Nov 1903; citing Winnebago, Illinois, United States, county offices, Illinois; FHL microfilm 1,914,051.

[10] "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MC1F-93J : 12 April 2016), Jonas F Packard, Parishville, St. Lawrence, New York, United States; citing family 72, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).

[11] "Illinois State Census, 1855," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:61SD-FT2 : 8 November 2014), Malcolm Packard, West Chicago, Ward 05, Cook, Illinois; citing p. 11, State Archives, Springville; FHL microfilm 976,180; "United States Census, 1900," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MQMV-958 : accessed 6 January 2018), Malcom Packard in household of Phineas Packard, Precincts 41-49, 2 (part) Overton, Pueblo, Colorado, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) 112, sheet 11A, family 175, NARA microfilm publication T623 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1972.); FHL microfilm 1,240,128.

[12] "United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MX23-L2Y : 14 August 2017), Malcom Packard in household of William Seaton, Seward, Winnebago, Illinois, United States; citing enumeration district ED 234, sheet 313B, NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 0262; FHL microfilm 1,254,262.

[13] "United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MDL5-LLQ : 14 August 2017), Lafayette Packard in household of Lafayette Packard, Frankville, Winneshiek, Iowa, United States; citing enumeration district ED 344, sheet 120B, NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 0370; FHL microfilm 1,254,370; "Iowa State Census, 1895," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VTQ1-XX4 : 30 June 2016), Layfayett Packard, Winnesheik, Iowa, United States; citing p. 408, 1895, State Historical Society, Des Moines; FHL microfilm 1,022,196; "United States Census, 1870," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MDVB-W2P : 12 April 2016), Lafayette Parker, Iowa, United States; citing p. 55, family 442, NARA microfilm publication M593 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.); FHL microfilm 545,917; "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MC41-FLL : 13 December 2017), Jonas F Packard, 1860.

[14]"United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M854-LX4 : 12 April 2016), Malcolm Packard, Seward, Winnebago, Illinois, United States; citing family 23, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).

[15] "United States Census, 1820," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHLB-VDL : accessed 6 January 2018), Jonas F Packard, Keene, Essex, New York, United States; citing p. 429, NARA microfilm publication M33, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 69; FHL microfilm 193,724; "United States Census, 1840," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHTH-4KN : 16 August 2017), Jonas Packard, Parishville, St Lawrence, New York, United States; citing p. 278, NARA microfilm publication M704, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 335; FHL microfilm 17,204.

[16] "United States Revolutionary War Rolls, 1775-1783," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2DG-LZYJ : 21 December 2016), Abisha Packard, 1775-1783; citing 1775-1783, Massachusetts, United States, citing NARA microfilm publication M246. Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Services, 1980. FHL microfilm 830,316; "United States Revolutionary War Rolls, 1775-1783," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2DG-LD1Z : 21 December 2016), Abisha Packard, 15 May 1777; citing 15 May 1777, Massachusetts, United States, citing NARA microfilm publication M246. Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Services, 1980. FHL microfilm 830,316; "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FZKX-8Q5 : 4 December 2014), Abisha Packard, ; citing , ; FHL microfilm 0873755 IT 2; "United States Census, 1810," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHLM-QBH : accessed 6 January 2018), Abisha Packard, Charlotte, Chittenden, Vermont, United States; citing p. 217A, NARA microfilm publication M252 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 64; FHL microfilm 218,668; "United States Revolutionary War Pension Payment Ledgers, 1818-1872," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q24Q-V6JT : accessed 6 January 2018), Abisha Packard, 08 May 1818; citing Vermont, United States, NARA microfilm publication T718 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1962), roll 1; FHL microfilm 1,319,381; "United States Census, 1820," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHG8-85C : accessed 6 January 2018), Abisha Packard, Madrid, Saint Lawrence, New York, United States; citing p. 47, NARA microfilm publication M33, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 79; FHL microfilm 193,734.

[17] Pension of Abisha Packard, *W26813, Widow's Pension Application File by his wife Rebecca, 1833, New York, National Archives, NARA M804, Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files, Record Group 15, National Archives, Ancestry.com.

[18] "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FZKX-8QR : 4 December 2014), Eleazer Packard in entry for Abisha Packard, ; citing , ; FHL microfilm 0873755 IT 2; "Massachusetts Deaths and Burials, 1795-1910," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHDR-DQ5 : 10 December 2014), Eleazer Packard, 13 Feb 1803; citing , reference item 1 p 517; FHL microfilm 1,871,835.

[19] Probate of Zaccheus Packard, "Massachusetts, Plymouth County, Probate Records, 1633-1967," images, FamilySearch), Probate records 1724-1731 and 1838-1842 vol 5-5T, images 66, 67, and 68, of 596; State Archives, Boston.

Note: This was originally posted on June 8, 2018 on the main Packed with Packards WordPress blog (it can also be found on the Wayback Machine here). My research is still ongoing, so some conclusions in this piece may change in the future.

#hewlett packard enterprise co #hewlett packard #david packard #packards #genealogy #family history #genealogy research #lineage #colorado #census #1910s #1920s #illinois #1880s #find a grave #1850s #pensions #probate #wills

1 note · View note

jamespoeartistry · 2 years

Text

youtube

#hewlett packard enterprise co #Youtube

0 notes

foryourinformationhere · 2 years

Text

This report analyzes key players, including their market share, market size, growth drivers, and company profiles. The purpose of this research report is to provide an in-depth analysis of the market overview, prevalent trends, demand, and recent changes that are affecting the global edge computing market.

The study also discusses product launches, market expansion, strategic growth analysis, market potential analysis, and technological advancements. It provides market size, prospective expansion, trends, and leading competitors' expansion plans.

With the help of this report, you will be able to gain insight into the competitors' positioning, market scope, growth potential, and future prospects.

Our report provides in-depth insights into the leading players in the global edge computing market for the next few years. To gain a stronghold in the global edge computing market, these key participants have adopted various business strategies. As a result, other businesses can gain a better understanding of how market leaders maintain dominance and expand their customer bases to secure a majority share.

There are a number of major players in the edge computing market, including:

AT&T Inc., Amazon Web Services (AWS), Cisco Systems Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Dell Inc., IBM Corporation, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Nokia Corporation, Microsoft Corporation

Request for Sample Report: https://www.nextmsc.com/edge-computing-market/request-sample

As part of this study, we will examine how COVID-19 impacted and altered the global edge computing market market environment. Demand, consumption, transportation, consumer behavior, supply chain management, exports, imports, and manufacturing are among the factors considered in the study. Furthermore, analysts have highlighted the elements that can help businesses identify opportunities in the near future and stabilize the industry.

Some of the key advantages discussed in this study report are a neutral outlook on market performance, recent industry trends, competitive landscapes and key players' strategies, potential and niche segments, and geographical regions contributing to promising growth.

Furthermore, the report provides historical, current, and future market sizes, along with a geographical forecast.

Depending on their industry verticals, the global edge computing market is divided into:

Energy & Utilities

Government & Public Sector

Healthcare

Manufacturing

Media & Entertainment

Transportation

Retail

Telecom & IT

Others

Global edge computing market applications can be categorized into:

Connected Cars

Smart Grids

Critical Infrastructure Monitoring

Traffic Management

Environmental Monitoring

Augmented Reality

Assets Tracking

Security & Surveillance

Others

A comprehensive analysis of all of the critical features of the global edge computing market industry has been conducted in the latest study. Market size, competition, development trends, niche markets, market drivers and challenges, SWOT analysis, Porter's five forces analysis, value chain analysis, and so on are covered from a macro-level to a micro-level.

According to the report, markets are categorized based on their component, industry verticals, organization size, applications, and regions, among other factors.

In order to be able to target products, sales, and marketing strategies accordingly, decision-makers must be familiar with the market segments. Businesses can advance product development by being guided on how to develop products tailored to meet the needs of different market segments.

Key stakeholders can use this market research report to develop plans for supporting the company's success by using statistics, tables, and graphs. It provides an in-depth analysis of the edge computing market across all major geographic regions, including North America, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

This report examines the dynamics of several regions in order to gain a clearer picture of the global market.

Read More: https://www.nextmsc.com/report/edge-computing-market

Inquire Before Buying: https://www.nextmsc.com/edge-computing-market/inquire-before-buying

About Us

Next Move Strategy Consulting is an independent and trusted third-platform market intelligence provider, committed to deliver high quality, market research reports that help multinational companies to triumph over their competitions and increase industry footprint by capturing greater market share. Our research model is a unique collaboration of primary research, secondary research, data mining and data analytics.

We have been servicing over 1000 customers globally that includes 90% of the Fortune 500 companies over a decade. Our analysts are constantly tracking various high growth markets and identifying hidden opportunities in each sector or the industry. We provide one of the industry’s best quality syndicates as well as custom research reports across 10 different industry verticals. We are committed to deliver high quality research solutions in accordance to your business needs. Our industry standard delivery solution that ranges from the pre consultation to after-sales services, provide an excellent client experience and ensure right strategic decision making for businesses.

For more insights, please visit, https://www.nextmsc.com

#edge computing #edge computing market #market analysis #market forecast #market growth #market trends #market share #market size #market value #market demand

3 notes · View notes

krapalm · 2 years

Text

Metro Connect and Hewlett Packard Enterprise arranged 2022 HPE Solution Day with MCC

Metro Connect Co., Ltd. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Thailand arranged “2022 HPE Solution Day with MCC” presented the best products and solutions from HPE that manage IT Infrastructure with maximum flexibility and efficiency, include the solutions to protect against cyber threats on October 7th 2022 at Grand Ballroom, The Grande Center Point Hotel, Terminal 21. At the seminar, Mr. Varuch…

View On WordPress

1 note · View note

newsmarketreports · 6 days

Text

Netgear Inc.: Analyzing Competitors in the Networking and Connectivity Market

Netgear Inc. is a prominent player in the global networking and connectivity market, renowned for its innovative products such as routers, switches, and network security solutions. The company competes in a dynamic industry characterized by rapid technological advancements and shifting consumer demands. This article provides an in-depth analysis of Netgear's key competitors, offering insights into their market positioning, product offerings, and strategic advantages.

Netgear’s Market Position

Netgear Inc., headquartered in San Jose, California, is known for its comprehensive portfolio of networking solutions that cater to both consumer and enterprise markets. The company’s product lineup includes:

Consumer Routers and Modems

Wireless Access Points

Network Switches

Network Security Solutions

Smart Home Devices

Netgear’s competitive edge lies in its ability to offer high-performance products with advanced features, backed by strong customer support and continuous innovation.

Key Competitors

1. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Cisco Systems, Inc. is a global leader in networking and cybersecurity solutions. With a diverse product portfolio that spans:

Enterprise Networking Solutions

Security Solutions

Cloud-Based Networking

Collaboration Tools

Cisco’s strengths include its extensive industry experience, robust R&D capabilities, and a wide range of enterprise-grade products. The company’s emphasis on network security and cloud integration positions it as a formidable competitor to Netgear in the enterprise market.

Competitive Advantages:

Strong Brand Recognition: Cisco is well-established and recognized for its reliable and scalable networking solutions.

Extensive Product Range: Offers comprehensive solutions from small business to large enterprise networks.

Innovative Technologies: Focuses on SD-WAN, IoT, and advanced security solutions.

2. Aruba Networks (Hewlett Packard Enterprise)

Aruba Networks, a subsidiary of Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), is a significant competitor in the wireless networking sector. Aruba’s key offerings include:

Wireless Access Points

Network Management Solutions

Edge Security Solutions

Aruba is known for its strong emphasis on wireless networking and network security, targeting both enterprises and educational institutions. Its solutions are designed to deliver seamless wireless connectivity and advanced security features.

Competitive Advantages:

Advanced Wireless Solutions: Known for high-performance Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E products.

Integrated Security: Focus on securing the network edge with advanced security capabilities.

Cloud-Based Management: Offers scalable, cloud-based network management solutions.

3. Ubiquiti Inc.

Ubiquiti Inc. is recognized for its innovative networking products, particularly in the wireless and broadband sectors. Ubiquiti’s product range includes:

Routers and Switches

Wireless Access Points

Surveillance Solutions

Ubiquiti’s competitive edge lies in its cost-effective solutions and focus on high-performance wireless networks. The company serves a diverse customer base, including small to medium-sized businesses and residential users.

Competitive Advantages:

Affordable Pricing: Offers high-quality products at competitive prices.

Scalable Solutions: Provides scalable solutions for a range of networking needs.

Strong Community Support: Benefits from a robust user community and support forums.

4. TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd.

TP-Link Technologies Co., Ltd. is a major competitor known for its wide array of networking products. TP-Link’s offerings include:

Home Routers and Modems

Networking Switches

Powerline Adapters

Smart Home Devices

TP-Link is recognized for its broad product portfolio and focus on providing reliable and affordable networking solutions for both consumer and business markets.

Competitive Advantages:

Extensive Product Line: Covers a wide range of networking needs from consumer to small business solutions.

Cost-Effective Products: Provides competitively priced products with strong performance.

Global Presence: Strong distribution network and brand presence in various markets.

5. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Juniper Networks, Inc. specializes in high-performance networking solutions for enterprises and service providers. Its product portfolio includes:

Routers and Switches

Network Security Solutions

Cloud Networking

Juniper’s focus is on delivering high-speed networking solutions and network automation, catering to large-scale enterprises and service providers.

Competitive Advantages:

High-Performance Solutions: Known for high-capacity and high-speed networking products.

Advanced Automation: Emphasis on network automation and software-defined networking (SDN).

Strong Enterprise Focus: Targets large enterprises and service providers with robust networking solutions.

Comparative Analysis

Product Range and Innovation

While Netgear focuses on a broad range of consumer and small business networking products, competitors like Cisco and Aruba Networks emphasize enterprise-grade solutions with advanced security and management capabilities. Ubiquiti and TP-Link offer cost-effective solutions that appeal to price-sensitive segments, while Juniper Networks provides high-performance solutions tailored to large enterprises.

Market Strategies

Netgear’s strategy includes a focus on innovation and user-friendly solutions, targeting both residential and small business markets. In contrast, Cisco and Aruba focus on comprehensive enterprise solutions with a strong emphasis on security and network management. Ubiquiti and TP-Link leverage competitive pricing and extensive product ranges to capture broader market segments.

Technological Advancements

Cisco and Aruba lead in integrating advanced technologies such as Wi-Fi 6/6E and cloud-based network management. Netgear also embraces innovation with its range of advanced home networking products but faces strong competition from these technology-driven rivals.

Conclusion

Netgear Inc. operates in a highly competitive market with several formidable rivals, each offering unique advantages and catering to different market segments. While Netgear’s strength lies in its comprehensive product portfolio and innovation, competitors like Cisco, Aruba Networks, and Ubiquiti bring specialized expertise and advanced technologies to the table. Understanding the competitive landscape allows Netgear to navigate its market positioning effectively and continue delivering high-quality networking solutions to its customers.

#NETGEAR Competitors

0 notes

trader-sg112 · 16 days

Text

U.S. Stock Market Recap: Dow Jones Dips, JetBlue and Tesla Soar Amidst Mixed Earnings Reports

The U.S. stock market faced a mixed session as the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped by 219 points or 0.50%, continuing its downward trend amidst cautious investor sentiment. The benchmark S&P 500 also fell by 0.3%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite matched the S&P's decline, dipping 0.3%. Despite the overall market downturn, specific stocks experienced notable movements.

Verizon (NYSE) ended the day marginally lower, reflecting broader concerns in the telecommunications sector. However, U.S. Steel (NYSE) bucked the trend, rising over 2%, driven by renewed investor interest in industrial stocks. Meanwhile, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co (NYSE) faced a sharp decline, falling 6% after bell earnings disappointed analysts.

On the positive side, JetBlue Airways Corp (NASDAQ) surged by more than 6%, buoyed by stronger-than-expected earnings and optimistic future projections. Tech giant Tesla Inc (NASDAQ) continued its upward trajectory, climbing over 4% as investors remain bullish on its growth prospects in the electric vehicle market.

This mixed performance highlights the ongoing volatility in the U.S. markets, with sectors responding differently to earnings reports, economic data, and broader global events. Investors are advised to stay informed and closely monitor the evolving market conditions.

#StockMarket #DowJones #S&P500 #Nasdaq #Verizon #USSteel #HewlettPackard #JetBlue #Tesla #MarketRecap #Investing #Stocks #FinancialNews

0 notes

hals90 · 1 month

Text

PTAB IPR finding of no obviousness vacated and remanded (specific benefit not required in motivation to combine analysis)

Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Docket No. 2022-2290, 2023-1183 (PR2021-00593, IPR2022-00081, IPR2022-00084) DYK, REYNA, STOLL August 16, 2024 Non-Precedential Brief Summary: FC panel vacated PTAB no obviousness decision vacated as specific benefit is not necessary for a motivation to combine and fact-based analysis was based only on attorney argument rather…

0 notes

creativeera · 1 month

Text

Embedded Computing Marled is Anticipated to Witness High Growth Owing to Wide Adoption Across End-use Industries

Embedded computing refers to a computer system that is part of a larger mechanical or electrical system designed to perform a dedicated function. Embedded systems are designed for specific control functions within embedded products and machines and operate under the direct control of an embedded program. Some key features of embedded systems include rugged construction, low power usage, real-time operating capabilities and compact size. Embedded devices are commonly found in industrial equipment, automobiles, consumer electronics, home appliances and medical devices to control electronic systems. Their key advantage is the ability to control electronic processes in a precise, flexible and cost-effective manner.

The global embedded computing market is estimated to be valued at US$ 112.45 Bn in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 174.38 Bn by 2031, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5% from 2024 to 2031.

Wide adoption across industries such as industrial automation, transportation, healthcare, telecommunication and consumer electronics is fueling market growth. Embedded systems allow streamlining of electronic processes, reducing downtimes and operation costs for end-use industries. Key Takeaways Key players operating in the embedded computing market are Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Inc., Advantech Co., Ltd., Avalue Technology Inc., Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Dell Technologies Inc., Emerson Electric Co., Fujitsu Limited, General Electric Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Honeywell International Inc., Intel Corporation, Kontron ST AG, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Inc., and Texas Instruments Incorporated. The Embedded Computing Market Demand offers significant opportunities for system integrators and solution providers through new product development and capability expansion. Growing digitization trends across industry verticals will continue to generate strong demand for embedded systems with advanced computing and connectivity features. Leading embedded computing companies are focusing on global expansion strategies through partnerships, joint ventures and acquisitions to solidify their presence in emerging economies of Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa. These regions offer high growth potential driven by ongoing modernization of infrastructure and growing electronics manufacturing activities. Market Drivers Wide adoption across industrial automation applications is a key driver for the embedded computing market. Use of embedded systems allows streamlining of electronic processes, reducing downtimes and operation costs for industrial equipment manufacturers. Growing connectivity trends through Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) will further propel demand. Rising electronics content in automobiles is positively impacting the market. Advanced driver assistance systems, infotainment systems and vehicle networking require powerful embedded computing solutions. Strict fuel efficiency and vehicle emissions norms will accelerate integration of embedded computing hardware. Market Restrain Design complexity of developing embedded system on a chip (SoC) poses challenges, especially for integrating advanced Embedded Computing Companies capabilities with low power requirements. This increases new product development timelines and costs. Limited standardization across various embedded system platforms inhibits seamless interoperability, data exchange and application portability. This poses difficulties for globally distributed product development activities.

Segment Analysis Automotive industrial and transportation is dominating the embedded computing market due to increasing implementation of advanced driver-assistance systems, connected vehicles solutions, electric vehicles, and autonomous vehicles. According to recent surveys over 65% of all new light vehicles shipped will have features like adaptive cruise control, automatic emergency braking, and blind spot monitoring by 2030. All these emerging technologies are driving the growth of embedded systems in automotive applications. Security and defense is another major sub segment in the embedded computing market owing to rising implementation of thermal weapon sights, combat management systems, imaging payloads and guidance systems in warships, aircraft carriers and fighter jets. Real-time information, enhanced situational awareness and integrated mission capabilities are some key priorities for embedded systems in defense applications. Various nations are also focusing on developing autonomous weapons which will further augment demand in coming years. Global Analysis North America dominates the global embedded computing market with a share of over 35% due to substantial research funding and presence of major OEMs in the region. US and Canada are hub for embedded technology development owing to advancement in networking infrastructure, IoT penetration and adoption of Industry 4.0 concepts. Asia Pacific shows fastest growth momentum led by China, India, Japan and South Korea. Low manufacturing cost and government initiatives to digitize industries are driving Asia Pacific market. Intensifying Sino-US trade war may impact supply chain dynamics in long run. Europe captures around 25% market share led by Germany, United Kingdom and France.

Get more insights on Embedded Computing Market

About Author:

Money Singh is a seasoned content writer with over four years of experience in the market research sector. Her expertise spans various industries, including food and beverages, biotechnology, chemical and materials, defense and aerospace, consumer goods, etc. (https://www.linkedin.com/in/money-singh-590844163)

#Coherent market insights #Embedded Computing Market #Embedded Computing #Microcontrollers #IoT #Firmware #Real-Time Operating Systems #Hardware Design #Software Development #Sensor Integration #Embedded Software

1 note · View note

thehealthcareinsights-blog · 2 months

Text

Swedish Scientists Unveil the World’s First ‘Living’ Computer Built from Human Brain Tissue

In an innovative development, Swedish scientists have achieved a major milestone in the field of biotechnology and neuroscience. For the first time, researchers have created a ‘living’ computer using human brain tissue. This revolutionary advancement was done by a Switzerland-based startup named FinalSpark. In this article, we will explore the science behind this pioneering research, how it works, and a lot more. For more such interesting articles visit The Healthcare Insights.

Introduction

The concept of living computers has been around for quite some time now. Now, Swedish scientists have created the world’s first ‘living computer’ and it is made out of human brain tissue. It is composed of 16 organoids also called clumps of brain cells. Organoids are tiny, self-organized three-dimensional tissue cultures made from stem cells. They were grown in a lab, which can send information to each other or among themselves.

How it works

These work organoids more or less like a traditional computer chip. They can send and receive signals through their neurons that act like circuits. But what makes them different is that the living machine consumes less energy, whereas living neurons can use over one million times less energy than the currently used digital processors.

Researchers have also compared the efficacy of these organoids with some of the most advanced computers, like the Hewlett Packard Enterprise Frontier. They found that the human brain can function at similar speeds and has 1,000 times more memory, all while using just 10 to 20 watts of energy. In stark contrast, high-end computers consume 21 megawatts.

An interesting aspect of this technology is its training method involving dopamine. When the organoids accomplish their tasks, they receive dopamine as a reward. This is delivered through light stimulation, similar to the natural release of dopamine in the human brain.

Development of Living Computer

The innovative technology of Living Computer was developed by the team of a startup company FinalSpark, this company focuses on biological neural networks to create novel solutions. Dr Fred Jordan, Co-CEO of FinalSpark said,’ We call it ‘wetware’ – I don’t know who created the word – but the brain is between software and hardware,’

The scientists’ team collected organoids, small samples of human brain tissue that are derived from neural stem cells, and placed them in a special environment that keeps stem cells alive. These were cultivated for about one month until they formed features like neurons. In the next stage, the team built FinalSparks mini-brains, from an estimated 10,000 living neurons and about 0.5 mm in diameter.

These mini-brains are surrounded by eight electrodes that measure activity in the organoids and perform the functions that stimulate the organoids along with recording the data they process. Later they took these mini-brains to specialized electrodes and performed computer processing along with digital analog conversions. Then transformed the neural activity into digital information.

Preservation and Lifespan

The organoids are kept in a small device, a microfluidic incubator, which delivers nutrients, acting like a mini plumbing system to keep the cells alive. This mini incubator helps to keep the organoids at body temperature and provides a suitable environment that is free of viruses and bacteria by automating the flow of cellular media.

The cells in the ‘living computer’ have a lifespan of about 100 days, during which they exist in a three-dimensional organoid structure. Despite their limited lifespan, these cells are quite similar to those present in real human brains, in their electrical activity.

The FinalSpark team has currently launched the Living computer as an online platform. Here researchers can remotely conduct experiments on biological neurons in vitro.

Conclusion

To conclude, The creation of the world’s first ‘living’ computer using human brain tissue by Swedish scientists marks a significant milestone in biotechnology and computing. This pioneering research opens new ways for advancements in medical research, artificial intelligence, and data processing.

Visit More : https://thehealthcareinsights.com/swedish-scientists-unveil-the-worlds-first-living-computer-built-from-human-brain-tissue/

0 notes

giresearch · 2 months

Text

Composite Fabrication Technology Market Size, Share & Forecast 2024-2030

On 2024-7-23 Global Info Research released【Global Composite Fabrication Technology Market 2024 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2030】. This report includes an overview of the development of the Composite Fabrication Technology industry chain, the market status of Consumer Electronics (Nickel-Zinc Ferrite Core, Mn-Zn Ferrite Core), Household Appliances (Nickel-Zinc Ferrite Core, Mn-Zn Ferrite Core), and key enterprises in developed and developing market, and analysed the cutting-edge technology, patent, hot applications and market trends of Composite Fabrication Technology. According to our (Global Info Research) latest study, the global Composite Fabrication Technology market size was valued at USD 7992.4 million in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD 12650 million by 2030 with a CAGR of 6.8% during review period. Composite manufacturing technology is a combination of two or more different materials. Various composition materials can complement each other in performance, and produce synergistic effects, so that the comprehensive performance of the composite material is superior to the original composition material, so as to meet various requirements. The Global Info Research report includes an overview of the development of the Composite Fabrication Technology industry chain, the market status of Aerospace and defense (Lay-up, Filament Winding), Wind Energy (Lay-up, Filament Winding), and key enterprises in developed and developing market, and analysed the cutting-edge technology, patent, hot applications and market trends of Composite Fabrication Technology. Regionally, the report analyzes the Composite Fabrication Technology markets in key regions. North America and Europe are experiencing steady growth, driven by government initiatives and increasing consumer awareness. Asia-Pacific, particularly China, leads the global Composite Fabrication Technology market, with robust domestic demand, supportive policies, and a strong manufacturing base. Market segment by Type： Lay-up、Filament Winding、Injection Molding、Pultrusion、Compression Molding、RTM、Others Market segment by Application：Aerospace and defense、Wind Energy、Transportation、Construction and Infrastructure、Electrical and Electronics、Others Major players covered： Accudyne Engineering、CMET、GEBE2 Productique、Hewlett Packard、Pultrex Ltd、Stratasys、Owens Corning、Toray Industries, Inc.、Teijin Limited、Solvay、Hexcel、SGL Group、Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.

Market segment by region, regional analysis covers: North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia, and Australia),South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Rest of South America),Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, South Africa, and Rest of Middle East & Africa). The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 15 chapters: Chapter 1, to describe Composite Fabrication Technology product scope, market overview, market estimation caveats and base year. Chapter 2, to profile the top manufacturers of Composite Fabrication Technology, with price, sales, revenue and global market share of Composite Fabrication Technology from 2019 to 2024. Chapter 3, the Composite Fabrication Technology competitive situation, sales quantity, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast. Chapter 4, the Composite Fabrication Technology breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales quantity, consumption value and growth by regions, from 2019 to 2030. Chapter 5 and 6, to segment the sales by Type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2019 to 2030. Chapter 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, to break the sales data at the country level, with sales quantity, consumption value and market share for key countries in the world, from 2017 to 2023.and Composite Fabrication Technology market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2025 to 2030. Chapter 12, market dynamics, drivers, restraints, trends and Porters Five Forces analysis. Chapter 13, the key raw materials and key suppliers, and industry chain of Composite Fabrication Technology. Chapter 14 and 15, to describe Composite Fabrication Technology sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion.

Data Sources:

Via authorized organizations:customs statistics, industrial associations, relevant international societies, and academic publications etc.

Via trusted Internet sources.Such as industry news, publications on this industry, annual reports of public companies, Bloomberg Business, Wind Info, Hoovers, Factiva (Dow Jones & Company), Trading Economics, News Network, Statista, Federal Reserve Economic Data, BIS Statistics, ICIS, Companies House Documentsm, investor presentations, SEC filings of companies, etc.

Via interviews. Our interviewees includes manufacturers, related companies, industry experts, distributors, business (sales) staff, directors, CEO, marketing executives, executives from related industries/organizations, customers and raw material suppliers to obtain the latest information on the primary market;

Via data exchange. We have been consulting in this industry for 16 years and have collaborations with the players in this field. Thus, we get access to (part of) their unpublished data, by exchanging with them the data we have.

From our partners.We have information agencies as partners and they are located worldwide, thus we get (or purchase) the latest data from them.

Via our long-term tracking and gathering of data from this industry.We have a database that contains history data regarding the market.

Global Info Research is a company that digs deep into global industry information to support enterprises with market strategies and in-depth market development analysis reports. We provides market information consulting services in the global region to support enterprise strategic planning and official information reporting, and focuses on customized research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, database and top industry services. At the same time, Global Info Research is also a report publisher, a customer and an interest-based suppliers, and is trusted by more than 30,000 companies around the world. We will always carry out all aspects of our business with excellent expertise and experience.

0 notes

govindhtech · 2 months

Text

Advanced ABCI 3.0 Supercomputer Increases AI Sovereignty

ABCI Supercomputer

Japan’s Advanced ABCI 3.0 Supercomputer Increases AI Sovereignty. HPE built a new AI supercomputer for AIST, one of the nation’s largest public research institutes, using hundreds of NVIDIA H200 GPUs and Quantum-2 InfiniBand.

NVIDIA H200

Japanese National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) will add thousands of NVIDIA H200 Tensor Core GPUs to its AI Bridging Cloud Infrastructure 3.0 supercomputer. to boost AI sovereignty and R&D. HPE Cray XD will use NVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand networking for performance and scalability.

ABCI 3.0, Japan’s latest Open AI Computing Infrastructure, promotes AI research and development. This partnership demonstrates Japan’s dedication to strengthening its technical independence and developing its AI capabilities.

ABCI

AIST Executive Officer Yoshio Tanaka stated, “They launched ABCI, the world’s first large-scale open AI computing infrastructure, in August 2018.” “They’re upgrading to ABCI 3.0 now, building on their expertise operating ABCI over the past few years. Their goal is to transform ABCI 3.0 into a computer infrastructure that will help Japan’s generative AI research and development capabilities grow in partnership with NVIDIA.

“It’s imperative to quickly cultivate research and development capabilities within Japan as generative AI prepares to catalyze global change,” stated Hirotaka Ogawa, Head of ABCI Operations at AIST Solutions Co. and Producer. “With their partnership with NVIDIA and HPE, Your that this significant upgrade of ABCI will strengthen the organization’s leadership in both domestic industry and academia, advancing Japan’s AI development towards global competitiveness and acting as a cornerstone for future innovation.”

ABCI 3.0: Japanese AI Research and Development Enters a New Era

AIST, its corporate subsidiary AIST Solutions, and its system integrator Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) are responsible for building and running ABCI 3.0.

METI

The ABCI 3.0 project is a component of a larger $1 billion initiative by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, or METI, which includes both ABCI efforts and investments in cloud AI computing. METI has supported the project’s efforts to strengthen its computing resources through the Economic Security Fund.

Following a visit by company founder and CEO Jensen Huang last year, where he met with business and political heavyweights, including Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, to explore the future of AI, NVIDIA is closely partnering with METI on research and teaching.

NVIDIA’s Dedication to the Future of Japan

Huang promised to work with others on research, especially in the areas of robotics, quantum computing, and generative AI. He also promised to invest in AI startups and offer product support, training, and education.

Huang stressed during his tour the importance of “AI factories,” which are next-generation data centers built to handle the most computationally demanding AI activities, in converting massive volumes of data into intelligence.

Huang declared, “The AI factory will become the bedrock of modern economies across the world,” in a December meeting with Japanese media. With its energy-efficient design and ultra-high-density data center, ABCI offers a reliable infrastructure for creating big data and artificial intelligence applications.

By year’s end, the system should be operational and provide cutting-edge resources for AI research and development. It will be located close to Tokyo in Kashiwa.

Superior Processing Speed and Effectiveness

The establishment will provide:

Six AI exaflops, a measurement of AI-specific performance in the absence of sparsity 408 double-precision petaflops, a unit of measurement for overall computer power The Quantum-2 InfiniBand platform connects each node with a bisectional bandwidth of 200 GB/s.

The foundation of this effort is NVIDIA technology, with hundreds of nodes outfitted with eight NVLlink-connected H200 GPUs each, offering hitherto unheard-of computational performance and efficiency.

The first GPU to provide more than 140 GB of HBM3e memory at 4.8 terabytes per second (TB/s) is the NVIDIA H200. Larger and faster memory on the H200 allows for faster generative AI and LLMs, as well as more advanced scientific computing for HPC workloads with reduced total cost of ownership and improved energy efficiency.

For AI workloads like LLM token creation, NVIDIA H200 GPUs are 15X more energy-efficient than ABCI’s previous-generation architecture.

The combination of cutting-edge NVIDIA Quantum-2 InfiniBand with In-Network computing, which offloads processing from the CPU to networking devices to perform data computations, guarantees effective, fast, low-latency communication essential for managing large datasets and demanding AI tasks.

ABCI is a platform to expedite collaborative AI research and development with industry, academia, and governments. It has state-of-the-art computing and data processing capabilities.

METI’s significant investment demonstrates Japan’s strategic goal of boosting AI development capabilities and quickening the use of generative AI.

ABCI infrastructure

The advanced cloud computing platform ABCI ( AI Bridging Cloud Infrastructure) 3.0 aids artificial intelligence research and development. Here are a few of ABCI 3.0‘s main attributes and advantages:

Principal Elements of High-Performance Computing (HPC)

Outfitted with cutting-edge GPUs and CPUs to deliver significant processing capability. suited for AI workloads, allowing for quicker machine learning model inference and training. Scalability. Able to flexibly scale resources in response to the demands of AI workloads. Facilitates large-scale production deployments as well as small-scale trials.

Fast-Network

Makes use of high-speed networking technology to provide high throughput and minimal latency. Allows for the effective transport of data across computing nodes.

Energy Effectiveness

Energy-efficient parts were used in the design to reduce the environmental effect. uses sophisticated power management and cooling systems to cut down on energy use.

Interface That’s Easy to Use

Offers user-friendly APIs and interfaces that make resource management and access simple. Makes it available to academics and developers by supporting a variety of AI frameworks and tools.

Advantages of Accelerated AI Research

Makes it possible for AI models to be trained, deployed, and prototyped quickly. Supports big datasets and intricate simulations, quickening the rate of advancement in AI.

Expense-effectiveness

Provides a pay-as-you-go pricing structure that lets customers tailor expenses to their usage. Lessens the requirement for large initial hardware purchases.

Working Together and Sharing

Makes it easier for institutions and academics to collaborate by granting shared access to potent computer resources. Encourages cooperative research environments by supporting joint initiatives and data sharing.

Enhanced Protection

Puts strong security measures in place to safeguard confidential information and intellectual property. Offers encryption and safe access restrictions to guarantee the confidentiality and integrity of data.

ABCI 3.0’s main attributes and advantages

Provides thorough support and educational materials to enable customers to get the most out of the platform.

Offers technical support, courses, and documentation to help with optimization and troubleshooting.

With the capabilities and resources needed to promote AI research and applications, ABCI 3.0 is a major improvement in cloud infrastructure designed with AI in mind.