CUANDO NIEVA, CUANDO NIEVA Y NIEVA…
Un poema de Mircea Cărtărescu, de Poesía Esencial (Impedimenta, 2021)
Mañanas felices junto al hornillo, contemplando cómo las flores de hielo
se funden lentamente… mañanas felices
cuando la nieve cuaja, cuaja, cuaja
entre los bloques. Señor,
¿por qué me das mañanas felices? Mañanas felices
abriendo la ventana, tragando el frío
y contemplando cómo la nieve cae entre los bloques. Podría ser
Canadá, Siberia…
Nadie me atosiga.
Mi máquina de escribir zurea.
Me he abrigado bien.
He tomado el café.
He escrito mis libros.
He vivido mi vida.
He encendido el hornillo con el mechero azul, de plástico transparente.
He soñado algo, pero no recuerdo qué.
Qué raro, los copos vuelan hacia arriba, hay tanta soledad,
cuánta soledad feliz me has dado, Dios mío,
cuánta soledad, como en ningún otro otoño
por dorado que fuera,
como en ningún verano… mírame, un egomaníaco
un hombre solo escribiendo en su cocina y que no quiere
salir a una Colentina nevada.
Cómo debe nevar ahí fuera… y los raíles del tranvía
cubiertos de nieve, y la nieve aventada de nuevo
de su hierro brillante… Y entre la bruma de copos
el tranvía viene… es lo único que se mueve
bajo las ráfagas, en Colentina.
Pero aquí estoy solo.
No lavo. No plancho. No hago las compras.
No me sueno la nariz.
Soy un hombre solo, sano, descansado,
acultural, apolítico.
Mi cabello está muy muy largo.
Pero mi poesía está calva como Sinead O’Connor
Y a mí me da igual.
Mañanas de duro invierno, de febrero cubierto de nieve
de un invierno duro y dichoso, lleno de luz blanca.
Mañanas, tardes, noches —en las que nieva y nieva y nieva
y nieva— y el viento brama
por el sistema de ventilación del bloque, y algo
golpea en el hueco del ascensor.
Me afanaba en otra época por escribir mis versos repletos de imágenes
por darles coherencia, por ordenarlos, por buscar la simetría
explotaban antaño mis labios, mis mejillas y dientes
de tanta droga, de tanta alucinación.
Y aquí estoy ahora: estéril, feliz
egomaníaco, devorando la nieve con los ojos. ¡Ay, Señor,
regálame este febrero, regálamelo tú!
Haz esto, haz lo otro… se acabó.
Piensa, siente, imagina… no tengo ganas.
Enzárzate con Dios… ¡Ja!
¡Ja! Todo me da igual.
No viviré eternamente.
No resolveré yo el misterio.
Me quedo aquí, calentito, viendo cómo nieva.
He aquí mi definición: estoy aquí, junto al hornillo
con la felicidad en el alma, contemplando la nieve —la que se ve
por el cristal ondulado— un individuo melenudo
que solo quiere una cosa: estar aquí
junto al hornillo, con la felicidad en el alma, contemplando la nieve.
Los copos vuelan hacia arriba, luego titubean en el aire blanco
caen oblicuos, en la profundidad de los bloques
y vuelven a subir… ¡qué curioso! ¡qué extraño!
Sí, qué curioso, Señor: estoy solo y vivo mañanas felices.
(Ayer: saqué fotos desde el balcón con mi Polaroid: primero a Kitty
sonriendo sobre el fondo de la nevada y del bloque mugriento de enfrente
después a Miri, sonriendo sobre el fondo de la nieve
y del bloque mugriento de enfrente. Y miramos fijamente los cuadrados blancos escupidos por la cámara hasta que las imágenes empezaron a salir, y luego
las pusimos en la librería, junto a mi cadenita de oro
y de esta forma dimos con El Levante
y lo leímos un rato, y luego ella dice (ya no sé qué decía),
y yo digo (¿qué le diría?), y fuera la nieve caía y caía, y la colada tiesa en la cuerda
llena de pelusa de nieve…
Anteayer: escribí un poema idiota, pero en él
había algo bueno: en el lejano norte
en Rusia, se combaban bajo el hielo los ríos Yeniséi y Lena
por los bosques vagaban presos prófugos
en una isba un joven melenudo
comía blinis, y el cierzo azotaba los postigos, era por la mañana
pero el joven tenía una vela, y el viento que silbaba entre las grietas de la isba
agitaba la llama de la vela, mientras el joven escribía con una pluma de oca:
«Oh, Nastia,
querida Nastia, si tú supieras…» Y la leña crepitaba en la estufa
y el rostro encendido del joven…
Requeteanteayer: estuve en la reunión del consejo
y durante la reunión, mientras se trataba
la situación de las revistas, yo soñaba
con escribir otra vez un libro esencial, estar otra vez con la máquina de escribir en brazos, con mi Erika
que me insulten de nuevo los viejos y los críos, y que las lectoras anónimas
modestas profesoras, doctores, pensionistas, alumnos de instituto
me lean debajo del edredón, bostezando al calor del hornillo,
levantando un instante los ojos de la página luminosa
para contemplar por la ventana la luz intensa de la nieve…
Qué decepcionados estarán con este libro,
este libro sin fotos
este libro…)
Pero a mí me da igual.
Nadie me atosiga.
El apartamento es mío.
El silencio es mío. Mi vida es mía.
Abro la ventana y cojo un puñado
de nieve blanca, esponjosa.
Abajo los coches aparcados están nevados,
los contenedores de basura nevados,
la barra de sacudir nevada.
¿Por qué me concedes mañanas felices? ¿Por qué las merezco?
Estoy arropado y tengo calor en este febrero cubierto de nieve… y estoy solo,
solo en todo Bucarest, quizá a excepción de los que
se hielan en las paradas… o solo…
y la nieve cae
y en el hornillo arde una llamita, y soy libre
y febrero, febrero, febrero
febrero, febrero… mañanas felices, Señor, cuando yo,
un egomaníaco, escribo a máquina
y me siento tan, tan…
BONUS (para el lector que ha recorrido este poema hasta el final): cuando nieva, cuando nieva
nieva, nieva, nieva, nieva
y nieva, nieva, nieva,
nieva, nieva, nieva, cuando nieva,
nieva y nieva, y nieva y
nieva y nieva, nieva, nieva, nieva y
nieva, cuando nieva, nieva,
nieva, nieva y nieva y
nieva y
nieva y
nieva y
2 notes
·
View notes
[...] nu-ncetasem să mă-ntreb cum ar fi fost oare să mă fi născut un sarcopt al râiei sau un păduche, sau unul dintre miliardele de polipi ce produc insulele de corali. Aș fi trăit fără să știu că trăiesc, viața ar fi fost o clipă de agitație obscură, cu dureri și plăceri și atingeri și alarme, și îndemnuri, departe de gândire și de conștiință, într-o gaură abjectă, într-o pată oarbă, într-o uitare totală. "Dar asta și sunt, asta și sunt,“ m-am pomenit deodată spunând cu voce tare. Asta suntem cu toții, acarieni orbi fojgăind pe firul nostru de praf în infinitatea neștiută, irațională, în fundătura oribilă a acestei lumi. Gândim, avem acces la structura logico-matematică a lumii, dar continuăm să trăim fără conștiință de sine și fără-nțelegere, săpând tunele-n pielea lui Dumnezeu, provocându-i doar iritare și mânie.
— Mircea Cărtărescu, Solenoid, Ed. Humanitas
I hadn’t stopped wondering what it would have been like to be born as a mite or a louse, or one of the billions of polyps on coral reefs. I would have lived without knowing that I lived, my life would have been a moment of obscure agitation, with pains and pleasures and contacts and alarms and urges, far from thought and far from consciousness, in some abject hole, in a blind dot, in total oblivion. But that is what I am, it is,” I suddenly found myself saying out loud. This is what we all are, blind mites stumbling along our piece of dust in an unknown, irrational infinity, in the horrible dead end of this world. We think we have access to the logical-mathematical structure of the world, but we continue to live without self-consciousness and without understanding, digging tunnels through the skin of God, causing him nothing but fits and irritation.
— trans. by Sean Cotter, Ed. Deep Vellum Publishing
9 notes
·
View notes
It's my birthday today, which always feels like a time to take account. The last month or two, I've endeavored to channel spates of low mood into the reasonably productive activity of reading, rather than mere vegetation, and I've had good success. I just finished Mircea Cărtărescu's Solenoid—a long novel about a lonely weirdo in communist Romania reckoning with existential dread. Also finished Susan Taubes's Lament for Julia, a novella paired with various short stories, all with a powerful Freudian bent, Taubes being the daughter of a psychoanalyst and prone to autobiographically inflected fiction. Fathers and daughters are locked in strange relation; men and women antagonize each other; there's much angst around the emergence and forcible repression of sexuality and desire. I also completed a reread of Crime and Punishment (impressive in its structure, if not at the line level; conservative, like much of Dostoevsky, in its premises and sympathies, though not without its points when it comes to the weaknesses that certain modes of thought can have when they're adopted carelessly, as vogues, and in arguing for the necessity of humility against despair when one's despair stems, as Raskolnikov's does, from overweening self-regard). And I read Rilke's Letters to a Young Poet—which was a funny one. Much to love in it, certainly. I also felt a bit of a twang reading, say, Rilke's condemnation of "the unreal half-artistic professions"—among which he includes "almost all of criticism"—"which, while they pretend proximity to some art, in practice belie and assail the existence of all art." Oh look, it's the form to which I've apparently pledged my troth, ha ha whoops.
I admit I wasn't blown away by Solenoid as I thought I might be. It offers a slightly banal resolution to existential crisis... That is, that the narrator ultimately meets the horror he spends about six-hundred pages grappling with—of the possibility that he might be trapped within three dimensions when a fourth, superior dimension might exist, meaning (I know this sentence is Going Places, stay with me) a dimension that is not ruled by the determinism by which any dimension is ruled in the eyes of those who can see it from the next dimension on, the same way that the life of, say, a mite might seem determined to us, all unthinking instinct and bound to a terribly specific and minute purpose, given our position as the mite's vast superior—that he counters the tremendous weight of this fear by turning to an abstract love for humanity and the purpose he finds in raising the child he has with his lover, Irina... It reminded me of the commitment to bourgeois normalcy that the protagonist of Antal Szerb's Journey by Moonlight makes, and how that let me down after his Master-and-Margarita-esque path through other, more hallucinatory forms of experience in the first three-quarters of that novel—which promised, I don't know, something more.
But I can understand the turn. And Solenoid does have some terrific setpieces along the way. One is the protest of the "Picketists"—a sect the narrator stumbles upon that stages demonstrations against life's pain and suffering (their signs bear lines like "Down with Death!" "Down with Rotting!" "Down with Accidents!" "NO to Agony!" and "Stop the Massacre!")—before a building in Bucharest that once housed one of the first institutes of forensic medicine, whose cupola bears thirteen statues depicting the soul's dark sides, Sadness, Despair, Fear, Bitterness, Melancholy, Revulsion, Nausea, Mania, Horror, Grief, Nostalgia, Resignation, and Damnation. Most striking is the way that protest ends, with the statue of Damnation—which has come alive, "as alive and slow-moving as soft glass and black as anthracite"—stamping on the lead protestor, Virgil, crushing him, when he asks her whether anything humanity can offer her will ever be enough.
Cărtărescu is also quite skillful at pacing his plot across the novel's 638 pages, as the narrator discovers each of the six solenoids sprinkled across Bucharest—the massive electromagnets that make possible eerie wonders like levitation and serve as engines that, essentially, power the world—and as he endures his own Virgil-like trial among the Picketists at the novel's end. Translator Sean Cotter also deserves a ton of credit, I'm sure. It can't have been easy to translate a narrative like this one, which depends so much on so many references to Bucharest's geography, Romania's history, and the histories of so many figures, so strangely intertwined—the forensic scientist Mina Minovici, who studied death (through, in Cărtărescu's telling, intense bouts of self-strangulation); the psychologist Nicolae Vaschide, who studied dreams, which in the narrator's mind join death as one of two potential means of escape from this world to the next; and the mathematician Charles Howard Hinton, who married Mary Ellen Boole, daughter of mathematician and logician George Boole, whose other daughter, Ethel, married Wilfrid Voynich, famous owner of the Voynich manuscript, which the narrator ultimately comes to possess and, at the novel's end, offers to the goddess Damnation, whereupon its pages somehow morph into a tesseract, the shape that Hinton once theorized as the fourth-dimensional analogue of the cube; the next level of complexity to it, just as the cube is the next-level of the two-dimensional square—thereby permitting the narrator one glimpse, one moment of contact with whatever it is that lies in the fourth dimension, beyond...
So, you know, it's been a time. If you're in the mood for a long novel about an intelligent, sensitive, neurotic thwarted artist confronting the fear that has oppressed his life, that engages whole histories of mathematics, logic, and philosophical thought along the way, you might give Solenoid a shot. Meanwhile, I'll end this with some words from Rilke in his last letter to the young poet, Franz Krappus, when Krappus was twenty-five: "Do you remember how [your] life yearned out of its childhood for the 'great'? I see that it is now going on beyond the great to long for greater. For this reason it will not cease to be difficult, but for this reason too it will not cease to grow." Arrange your life, he tells Krappus, according to that principle which counsels us that we must always hold to the difficult. I'm certainly not in my twenties as I write this, but the lines still inspire.
3 notes
·
View notes