#PHP Vs Angular Comparison | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

omninostechnologiespvtltd · 6 months ago

Text

A Guide To Average Website Development Cost - Omninos Technologies

Having a website is no longer a luxury but a necessity. Whether you are a small business owner, a budding entrepreneur, or part of a large enterprise, your online presence often begins with a well-designed website. But how much does it cost to develop a website? This comprehensive guide breaks down the Average Website Development Cost and explores factors influencing these costs. At Omninos Technologies, we aim to provide tailored solutions to fit your budget and goals.

Understanding Website Development Costs

Website development costs can vary significantly depending on the complexity, features, and expertise involved. A basic informational website might cost less, while an e-commerce platform with advanced functionalities will require a larger investment. Let’s delve into the key components influencing the cost.

Key Factors Affecting Website Development Costs

Type of Website

Informational Websites: These are simple websites that provide essential information about your business. They are cost-effective and ideal for startups.

E-commerce Websites: Equipped with online shopping capabilities, payment gateways, and inventory management, these websites are more expensive.

Custom Websites: Tailored to specific needs, custom websites require additional time and expertise, impacting the cost.

Design and User Interface (UI)

A visually appealing and user-friendly design can enhance user engagement but may increase the overall cost.

Functionality and Features

Features like contact forms, booking systems, blogs, and custom integrations contribute to cost variations.

Content Management System (CMS)

Platforms like WordPress, Shopify, or custom CMS influence the development cost.

Technology Stack

The choice of programming languages and frameworks (e.g., PHP, Python, React, Angular) plays a role in determining costs.

Developer’s Expertise

Hiring an experienced developer or agency like Omninos Technologies ensures quality but may come with a higher price tag.

Hosting and Domain Costs

Ongoing expenses include purchasing a domain name and web hosting services.

Maintenance and Support

Post-launch support, regular updates, and security enhancements contribute to ongoing costs.

Breakdown of Average Website Development Cost

Here is an approximate breakdown of average website development cost based on different categories:

1. Basic Informational Website

Cost Range: $500 - $2,500

Features: Simple layout, 5-10 pages, responsive design, basic CMS integration.

2. Small Business Website

Cost Range: $2,000 - $8,000

Features: Custom design, advanced CMS, basic SEO optimization, and interactive elements.

3. E-commerce Website

Cost Range: $5,000 - $20,000+

Features: Online store setup, payment gateways, inventory management, and user accounts.

4. Custom Web Applications

Cost Range: $10,000 - $50,000+

Features: Unique functionalities, APIs, cloud integrations, and scalability options.

5. Enterprise Websites

Cost Range: $20,000 - $100,000+

Features: Advanced security, large-scale databases, multilingual support, and enterprise-level integrations.

Cost Comparison: Freelancers vs. Agencies

Hiring Freelancers

Pros: Cost-effective for small projects.

Cons: Limited resources, potential quality issues.

Hiring Agencies (like Omninos Technologies)

Pros: End-to-end solutions, expertise across domains, and reliable support.

Cons: Higher initial investment.

Why Choose Omninos Technologies?

At Omninos Technologies, we specialize in delivering high-quality websites tailored to your needs. Here’s why you should choose us:

Expertise Across Industries: Our team has experience in healthcare, e-commerce, education, and more.

Custom Solutions: We offer bespoke designs and functionalities to meet your business goals.

Affordable Pricing: We provide competitive pricing without compromising quality.

Post-Launch Support: Our team ensures your website runs smoothly with ongoing maintenance and updates.

Transparent Process: We keep you informed at every stage of development.

Tips to Optimize Your Website Development Budget

Define Clear Objectives: Understand what you need before starting the project.

Choose the Right Partner: Work with reliable agencies like Omninos Technologies.

Prioritize Features: Focus on essential functionalities initially and scale later.

Leverage Open-Source Tools: Platforms like WordPress can save costs.

Plan for the Future: Consider scalability and future updates in your budget.

FAQs About Website Development Costs

1. What is the average cost of website maintenance?

Maintenance typically costs $500 to $2,000 annually, depending on the complexity.

2. Can I get a website for under $500?

Yes, but these are usually DIY websites with limited features and scalability.

3. How long does it take to develop a website?

Development time ranges from a few weeks for basic websites to several months for custom solutions.

4. Are there hidden costs in website development?

Hidden costs may include premium plugins, third-party tools, and ongoing marketing expenses.

5. Do I need a mobile-friendly website?

Absolutely. Mobile responsiveness is essential for better user experience and SEO.

Final Thoughts

Understanding the Average Website Development Cost helps businesses plan their budgets effectively. Whether you need a basic informational website or a feature-rich e-commerce platform, partnering with a reliable agency like Omninos Technologies ensures your investment pays off. Reach out to Omninos today for a personalized quote and elevate your online presence.

#Omninos Technologies #Average Website Development Cost

0 notes

elixentblog · 6 months ago

Text

Frontend vs. Backend Frameworks: A Full-Stack Perspective for Businesses

Modern software development hinges on frameworks that bridge both sides, ensuring a seamless user experience and efficient application functionality. This article delves into the roles of frontend and backend frameworks, their importance in full-stack development, and how businesses can leverage these tools by hiring full-stack developers or engaging with custom software development services.

What Are Frontend Frameworks?

Frontend frameworks handle the client side of an application, focusing on what users see and interact with. They are essential for creating intuitive, dynamic, and visually appealing user interfaces.

Some popular frontend frameworks include:

React: Known for its component-based architecture, it allows developers to build reusable and efficient UI elements.

Angular: A comprehensive framework for building robust single-page applications (SPAs).

Vue.js: Lightweight and easy to integrate, suitable for developing high-performance user interfaces.

Frontend frameworks enhance user experience by ensuring fast loading times, smooth animations, and responsive designs, making them crucial for customer-facing applications developed by a mobile development company or other specialized teams.

What Are Backend Frameworks?

Backend frameworks focus on the server side, handling the application logic, database interactions, and security. They ensure the smooth functioning of features like data storage, user authentication, and API integration.

Key backend frameworks include:

Node.js: A JavaScript runtime known for its speed and scalability, often used in real-time applications.

Django: A Python-based framework emphasizing security and rapid development.

Laravel: A PHP framework designed for web application backends with elegant syntax and tools for caching and routing.

These frameworks provide the backbone for modern applications, ensuring they remain secure and efficient while meeting the demands of users and businesses alike.

Full-Stack Development: Bridging Frontend and Backend

Full-stack development involves expertise in both frontend and backend frameworks, enabling developers to create cohesive applications. Full-stack developers use their knowledge to integrate these frameworks effectively, ensuring the application’s frontend and backend communicate seamlessly.

For businesses, hiring full-stack developers or partnering with a custom software development company offers several benefits:

Cost Efficiency: Full-stack developers can handle multiple development stages, reducing the need for specialized resources.

Faster Delivery: With a single team managing the entire stack, projects progress more quickly.

Scalability: Full-stack developers can design scalable applications by leveraging the strengths of both frontend and backend frameworks.

Full-Stack Frameworks: A Unified Approach

While most applications rely on separate frontend and backend frameworks, some full-stack frameworks provide a unified solution for both. These frameworks streamline development by offering built-in tools for both sides of the stack.

Examples include:

Meteor.js: A JavaScript framework offering end-to-end development for web and mobile apps.

Ruby on Rails: Combines backend logic with frontend templates for efficient development workflows.

Such frameworks simplify the development process, making them ideal for businesses seeking rapid deployment and reduced complexity.

Frontend vs. Backend Frameworks: A Comparison

Frontend Frameworks

Purpose: User interface and experience

Examples: React, Angular, Vue.js

Focus: Visual design, interactivity

Impact on Full-Stack: Enhances user engagement

Backend Frameworks

Purpose: Application logic and database management

Examples: Node.js, Django, Laravel

Focus: Performance, security, and scalability

Impact on Full-Stack: Ensures reliable functionality

Understanding the distinct roles of these frameworks helps businesses choose the right combination for their needs, whether they’re partnering with a mobile development company or building in-house teams.

Why Businesses Should Invest in Full-Stack Development

In today’s competitive market, businesses must focus on delivering seamless, high-quality digital experiences. Full-stack development allows for end-to-end project management, with developers skilled in frontend and backend technologies.

Scenarios where hiring full-stack developers benefits businesses:

Startups needing a quick, cost-effective MVP.

Enterprises requiring scalable and secure applications.

Businesses looking to reduce development timelines without compromising quality.

Conclusion

Frontend and backend frameworks are the building blocks of modern software development. By hiring experienced full-stack developers or engaging with a custom software development company, businesses can integrate the best of both worlds, delivering applications that are both user-friendly and functionally robust.

If you’re planning your next software project, consult with experts offering custom software development services or a mobile development company to choose the right frameworks and development approach for your goals.

#mobile app development #frontend development #backend development #backend frameworks #full stack development

1 note · View note

vinhjacker1 · 2 years ago

Text

PHP vs. Other Programming Languages: A Comparison for Web Development

In the world of web development, choosing the right programming language is a crucial decision. Among the multitude of options, PHP, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript stand out as prominent players. Each of these languages offers its own set of advantages and use cases. In this article, we'll compare PHP with these languages to help you make an informed choice for your web development projects.

PHP: The Server-Side Scripting Language

PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor) is a server-side scripting language primarily designed for web development. It's known for its simplicity, widespread adoption, and seamless integration with various databases. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Web-Centric Focus: PHP is tailored for web applications and excels in server-side scripting. It's particularly well-suited for content management systems (CMS) like WordPress and e-commerce platforms like Magento.

2. Easy to Learn: PHP is considered one of the easiest languages to learn, making it an excellent choice for beginners in web development.

3. Abundant Resources: The PHP community is vast and has contributed a wealth of libraries, frameworks (e.g., Laravel, Symfony), and extensions to extend its functionality.

4. Database Integration: PHP seamlessly integrates with databases like MySQL, making it a powerful choice for database-driven web applications.

Python: The Versatile Language

Python is renowned for its simplicity, readability, and versatility. While it's a general-purpose language, it has gained significant traction in web development thanks to frameworks like Django and Flask. Here's how Python compares:

1. Readability: Python's syntax is known for its readability, which makes it an excellent choice for developers who value clean and maintainable code.

2. Versatility: Python isn't limited to web development; it's used in various domains, including data science, machine learning, and automation.

3. Rapid Development: Python's frameworks, particularly Django, enable developers to build web applications quickly.

4. Strong Community: Python boasts an active and supportive community, offering an abundance of libraries and resources.

Ruby: The Language Behind Rails

Ruby is known for its elegant and developer-friendly syntax. It powers the Ruby on Rails framework, celebrated for its "convention over configuration" approach. Here's how Ruby stacks up:

1. Rails Framework: Ruby's true strength lies in its web framework, Ruby on Rails, which promotes rapid development and follows best practices.

2. Developer Happiness: Ruby prioritizes developer happiness, emphasizing clean, concise code that's enjoyable to write.

3. Convention Over Configuration: Rails reduces the need for developers to make decisions by providing sensible defaults.

4. Active Community: While not as massive as PHP or Python, the Ruby community is dedicated and passionate about their language.

JavaScript: The Frontend Powerhouse

JavaScript, often referred to as the "language of the web," is the go-to language for frontend web development. Its key attributes include:

1. Frontend Dominance: JavaScript is essential for building interactive and dynamic web interfaces.

2. Full Stack Potential: With the advent of Node.js, JavaScript has extended its reach to server-side development, offering full stack capabilities.

3. Rich Ecosystem: JavaScript has a vast ecosystem of libraries, frameworks (e.g., React, Angular, Vue.js), and packages to enhance web development.

4. Browser Compatibility: JavaScript is supported by all major browsers, ensuring wide accessibility.

In conclusion, the choice between PHP, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript depends on your project's specific requirements and your personal preferences as a developer. PHP is a robust choice for server-side scripting and web-centric applications. Python shines with its readability and versatility. Ruby excels in rapid web development with Rails. JavaScript is indispensable for frontend interactivity and has expanded to the backend with Node.js. Ultimately, the right language for your web development journey will depend on your project goals and development philosophy.

#WebDevelopment #ProgrammingLanguages #PHP #Python #Ruby #JavaScript #WebFrameworks #ComparativeAnalysis #TechComparison #WebDev #CodingLanguages #DevelopmentTools

1 note · View note

instailyacademy · 2 years ago

Text

🔍 Let's dive into a tech showdown! 💥 Today, we're putting the spotlight on MEAN Stack vs. LAMP Stack - two giants in the web development arena. 🌐💻

💡 The MEAN Stack boasts MongoDB, Express, Angular, and Node.js, while the LAMP Stack features Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. Each comes with its own set of strengths and use cases. 📈

🤝 Join the discussion! Which stack do you prefer, and why? Share your insights and experiences in the comments below! 👇

🗂 Here's a quick comparison: MEAN Stack:

Ideal for building complex and scalable web applications. JavaScript throughout the stack.

LAMP Stack:

Great for content-driven web applications. PHP for server-side scripting.

#mean stack #lamp stack #mean stack vs. lamp stack #tech showdown

1 note · View note

deltainfoteklive · 2 years ago

Text

Which is More Paid The Frontend or Backend?

In the dynamic world of technology, two essential branches stand out: front-end development and back-end development. These roles play distinct yet interconnected parts in creating functional and user-friendly websites and applications. One question that frequently arises for aspiring developers is, "Which is more paid: front end or backend?" In this article, we delve into the comparison of earnings, skills, and demand between front-end and back-end roles to help you make an informed decision about your career path. Which is More Paid: Front End or Backend? Front-end and back-end development both offer unique challenges and opportunities, but when it comes to earning potential, which one comes out on top? Let's explore this question by analyzing various aspects of both roles. Earnings in Front-End Development Front-end developers are responsible for designing the user interface and ensuring a seamless user experience. While their role focuses on the visual and interactive elements of a website or application, their earnings should not be underestimated. According to recent industry reports, experienced front-end developers command competitive salaries, with the potential to earn well above the average. Skills That Pay: Front-End Development Front-end development demands a combination of technical and creative skills. Proficiency in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript is essential, along with an understanding of responsive design and user experience principles. Additionally, expertise in front-end frameworks such as React or Angular can significantly enhance earning potential. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, businesses value developers who can create captivating user interfaces that drive engagement and conversions. Demand for Front-End Developers The demand for skilled front-end developers remains robust, driven by the growing need for user-centric design and mobile-friendly interfaces. As more businesses establish an online presence, the role of a front-end developer becomes integral to their success. Start-ups, established companies, and e-commerce ventures are all on the lookout for individuals who can translate design concepts into captivating web experiences. Back-End Development: Behind the Scenes Prosperity While front-end developers create the face of a website, back-end developers work behind the scenes to ensure everything runs smoothly. Their role involves managing databases, servers, and application logic. Back-end development might not receive as much spotlight, but it offers lucrative earning potential that reflects its importance in maintaining a functional digital ecosystem. The Power of Back-End Skills Back-end development requires a strong grasp of programming languages such as Python, Java, Ruby, or PHP, depending on the company's tech stack. Database management and server optimization skills are equally crucial. Back-end developers who excel in ensuring data security, efficient data retrieval, and overall system performance are highly sought after. Back-End Demand and Security In an age where data breaches are a significant concern, the demand for skilled back-end developers continues to rise. Businesses need professionals who can safeguard sensitive information, implement robust authentication protocols, and maintain the integrity of their digital infrastructure. As technology evolves, back-end roles diversify, encompassing cloud computing, DevOps, and more, further amplifying their demand. Exploring the Factors: Front End vs. Back End In the ongoing debate of which is more paid, it's essential to consider various factors before making a decision: Market Trends and Specialization Market trends play a vital role in determining the demand for a particular skill set. While both front-end and back-end roles are essential, the ever-changing tech landscape might influence the compensation scale differently for each role. Company Size and Type The size and type of the company you work for can impact your earning potential. Larger corporations might offer higher salaries, but start-ups and smaller firms might compensate with additional perks or equity. Geographic Location Geographic location significantly affects earning potential. Tech hubs like Silicon Valley often offer higher salaries to match the higher cost of living, while remote or less tech-focused areas might have lower compensation. Professional Development and Growth Opportunities Consider the growth opportunities and professional development pathways each role offers. These factors can contribute to overall job satisfaction and long-term earning potential. FAQs What is the average salary for a front-end developer? Front-end developers' salaries vary depending on experience, location, and company size. On average, an entry-level front-end developer can earn around $60,000 to $80,000 annually, while experienced developers might earn well over $100,000. Are back-end developers in high demand? Yes, back-end developers are in high demand due to the increasing reliance on digital infrastructure and data security. Skilled back-end developers can expect numerous job opportunities and competitive compensation. Can I switch from front end to back end or vice versa? Yes, transitioning between front-end and back-end roles is possible with the right skill development. While these roles have distinct focuses, many fundamental programming skills are transferable. How do specialization and certifications impact earning potential? Specializing in a specific technology stack or obtaining relevant certifications can enhance your earning potential in both front-end and back-end roles. Certifications validate your expertise and can make you a more attractive candidate to potential employers. Is remote work common in these roles? Yes, both front-end and back-end developers often have the option to work remotely. The rise of virtual collaboration tools and flexible work arrangements has made remote work more feasible in the tech industry. Which role offers better job security? Both front-end and back-end roles offer excellent job security, given the constant need for web and application development. However, back-end roles focused on data security and infrastructure maintenance might have a slight edge in this aspect. Conclusion In the end, the question of whether front-end or back-end roles offer higher pay doesn't have a definitive answer. Both roles have their unique challenges and rewards, making them valuable components of the tech ecosystem. Earning potential depends on factors such as experience, skills, location, and market demand. As you embark on your tech journey, remember that continuous skill development, staying updated with industry trends, and seeking growth opportunities are key to unlocking your earning potential. Read the full article

0 notes

solwininfotech · 4 years ago

Link

In this guide, developers can learn about Angular vs PHP and how they can be used to develop websites and applications.

#Angular Vs PHP #PHP Or Angular #PHP Or AngularJS #PHP Vs Angular #PHP Vs Angular Comparison #PHP Vs Angular Difference #PHP Vs AngularJS

0 notes

austinbreesjump · 3 years ago

Text

Angular Vs ReactJS – The Right Pick For Your Next Project

JavaScript frameworks are a dime a dozen in the development marketplace. Such frameworks are platforms that provide structures of application design for developing web applications based on JavaScript.

Angular vs Reactjs are two of the most famous front-end frameworks for web development. But how can you pick between the two?

If you're trying to decide whether to use Angular or React for your next project, it's important to understand the key differences between the two.

React is a JavaScript library, while Angular is a framework. This means that with React, you're getting a set of tools that you can use as you see fit, whereas, with Angular, you're getting a more opinionated structure.

React is also component-based, while Angular is template-based. This means that in React, you can break your UI down into small, reusable pieces, and then compose them together to create a complete UI. With Angular, you're working with templates compiled into components at build time.

When it comes to front-end web development, two of the most popular frameworks are Angular and React. Both these javascript Frameworks offer a lot of features and benefits that make them ideal for modern web development.

Finally, React uses JavaScript, while Angular uses TypeScript. This means that React is more flexible when it comes to the language you can use, as you're not limited to TypeScript.

However, there are some key differences between the two frameworks that you need to take into account before deciding which one to use for your next project.

Here’s a quick comparison of Angular vs React to help you make the right decision:

Also, Read this - Node js Vs PHP: Which is Better for Your Project?

Angular:

- Developed by Google

- Uses TypeScript language

- Follows MVC structure

- Has a large community and extensive documentation

- Offers two-way data binding

- Ideal for large-scale projects

React:

- Developed by Facebook

- Uses JavaScript language

- Follows component-based architecture

- Has a small community but growing rapidly

- Offers one-way data binding

- Ideal for small to medium-sized projects

Also, Read this - Top Benefits of MEAN Stack for Web App Development

As you can see, both Angular and React have their own advantages and disadvantages. It’s important to evaluate your project requirements before deciding which framework to use.

So, which one should you choose? It really depends on your project and your preferences. If you're looking for a more flexible framework that will allow you to use the language of your choice, then React Developer is the way to go.

However, if you're looking for a more opinionated framework that will give you a fast and reliable structure, then Angular Developers is the right pick.

If you need help with your front-end web development project, contact JumpGrowth today and our team of experts can guide you in the right direction.

1 note · View note

amandaallen · 4 years ago

Text

Web App vs Cloud App: The future of app development

Whether it is an established firm or a startup, apps bridge the gap between companies and customers. Of course, the idea behind the app is the most critical factor. However, the major challenge is to bring an idea to life, make it a reality.

It is equally important to choose an appropriate platform (i.e., Web or cloud) and ensure it gets the best design. Here, it would be best to have a top web application development team to help you realize the web app vs cloud app scenario. One can also hire dedicated developers to get the relevant app development get going.

So let’s begin by understanding each of these platforms one by one.

What is a Cloud App?

The “cloud” refers to the computing architecture with a unique mechanism to store and access software and data on the internet instead of storing it into the computer’s hard drive.

According to Cisco, 95% of total data center traffic will be through cloud computing, replacing traditional data centers in the next three years!

Cloud-based apps are highly advanced web applications. However, it relies on web browsers. It can be customized only when it is connected to the cloud. This is done by web interfaces that are used to access cloud-based applications.

Top Features of Cloud-based Applications

There are plenty of advanced features of cloud-based applications like:

Cloud data storage (online). It is possible to store data online temporarily and used it later even when offline.

Data can be cached locally. The data can be further used from a web browser or custom-built mobile apps.

Cloud-based applications are user-friendly to support the prerequisites of customers, including security, data compression, and backup schedule.

It also supports the access of different platforms for application development, on-demand computing cycle, etc.

It supports different types of user requirements.

It is easy to operate from any device with an internet connection on the browser, including desktop and mobile phones.

While it may not be possible to recognize an app through its features, you may know a few existing apps like Dropbox, NetSuite, Sugar Sync, Evernote, and Mozie.

Moreover, web emails like Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft Hotmail also synchronize correctly.

Benefits of Cloud-based Apps

When it comes to web app vs cloud app, the latter offers excellent business opportunities. From network capabilities to on-demand services and accessibility of shared resources, the cloud-based servers deliver multiple benefits.

Some of the significant ones include:

Cloud application development reduces management involvement and efforts.

Users involved in on-demand services find this extremely helpful as the cloud matches their requirements. It also offers location independence and access to data and information from anywhere or any device.

It offers a broader computing ability, which includes both online as well as offline.

Different types of cloud-based application users can easily access the cloud server by making a payment. You can have access to the full functionalities of a cloud-based app without installing the software.

Cloud services providers, their performance, and availability can change how things work and enhance profitability.

Cloud apps are advanced. They serve several users simultaneously with varied virtual needs.

Cloud apps allow users to monitor, control, and report used resources. As a result, it offers transparency to consumers as well as resource providers.

What is a Web App?

Web apps can be used only on web browsers. Web apps are a perfect combination of server-side (.NET and PHP) and client-side (Adobe Flash and HTML) script.

Moreover, web apps mainly depend on the browsers and their server components, which further receive backend infrastructure support.

Web apps also feature convenience and allow users to access an app from anywhere they want with the computing model’s help.

However, the primary difference between a web app and a cloud app is that it offers only a few customization options.

Online services, such as online shopping, internet banking, are examples of web apps. Albeit these are web-based applications, but they have a few limitations concerning alternative customization. For instance, users consider Facebook a cloud-based app, whereas it is designed to perform as a web-based app. While cloud apps may or may not be web apps, but web apps are not cloud apps.

Benefits of Web-based Apps

Users can access web apps from anywhere, from any browser.

In a compatible web browser, users can access a web app easily, which reduces lags and compatibility issues.

You can expect minimum maintenance and maximum returns. Thus, it reduces the cost of web application development and offers leeway to clients.

No download or installation needed to use an app, hence, eliminating storage restrictions.

Web apps do not store client information. Therefore, it reduces the risk of data leak or piracy.

No frequent updates for web apps as the apps regularly update as and when required without any installation or reinstallation.

Web app vs Cloud app: Comparison

1. Legacy

Web apps came before cloud apps. That’s one of the fundamental differences. Web-based applications refer to all types of applications.

2. Technology

Web application development is associated with web technologies, based on the latest backend languages like Python, Ruby, .NET, and PHP, using remote databases like SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and others.

Contrarily, cloud application development requires a backend framework, and they need a javascript-based framework for optimized performance. Node, Angular, and React.js are some optimum choices.

Cloud apps use alternative options for a database, such as browser-based choices, local opportunities, and Firebase. Using cloud apps is one of the most significant distinct factors in such frameworks. With HTML5 offline cache feature, it enables apps to perform without internet connectivity.

3. Usage

Cloud apps can work offline, fully, or partially. They are the best choice for applications that require high computation, or they operate reliably despite sporadic internet connectivity. They are also the right choice for collaboration-based apps.

Contrarily, web applications can work only in a browser with good internet connectivity. As such, they are the safest choice for transactional apps like eCommerce sites, bulletin boards, booking services, and information sharing portals.

4. Expenses

Building a reliable web app that would work offline is expensive than building a conventional browser-only app. And there are very few web or cloud application development professionals with the required skills. Moreover, teams building cloud apps are always high in demand than the teams building web apps. Hence, cloud apps are relatively more expensive compared to web apps.

5. Services

Apps are tools for connecting users with businesses. That is one of the most critical reasons for companies to invest in an app.

Likewise, there is a steady demand for web apps. These are excellent for building a strong and continuous connection with users. For instance, Amazon, Airbnb, YouTube are doing a great job as web apps. Switch to cloud apps, they are designed to support offline, but they function automatically and exclusively when the internet restores. Some examples include Evernote, Dropbox, etc.

Web app vs cloud app difference goes a long way. However, both these apps are meant for specific roles for enterprises as well as users.

Conclusion

Regardless of the difference between web-based applications and advanced cloud-based applications, both technologies have one DNA. However, they serve different purposes, objectives, and users. If you are considering options for software development, question your requirements before you commit to anything specific. It can cost you double of what you should be paying or make your application unfit for its intended purpose.

0 notes

fortunesoft-it-innovations · 5 years ago

Link

When you are implementing several technologies, deciding on the right technological stack for your business is not an easy task. By enhancing your technological infrastructure, it always puts you in minor setbacks. However, you are required to do quite often, and you cannot escape that. There are various database architectures and software solutions available, and you are not aware on every one of them, so you can’t figure out which solution to go for and why.

So, in this article, we’ll brief you about the two technology stacks to choose from for your ongoing business. But before you start comparing the differences of each technology stack, you need to understand the attribution and feasibility of stack which is very crucial in development as well as product solutions.

Here are a few aspects you need to take care before choosing the right stack for your project :

1 – Know your project requirement

2 – Shift to Agile model

3 – Go beyond your project requirements for better user experience

4 – Experience and knowledge of development team

5 – Flexibility and Scalability of the team

6 – The cost of development

Let us try to understand the differences which will make you easier to decide the correct technology stack for your project.

Introducing LAMP Stack development

LAMP stands for Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP, Perl or Python. It is one of the earliest stacks in web development and well suited for dynamic websites and web applications. It is still implemented as it offers great substitute to commercial Software packages.

As LAMP stack is opensource it allows developers to avoid vendor lock-in and develop for the web without having to spend much towards their development. For many years, it has been a compelling solution to develop enterprise level web apps with advanced customisation and flexibility. LAMP interacts with end users and source can be altered to suit the specific needs of the developer.

Benefits of LAMP Stack Development :

1 – Easy to Deploy :

The deployment factor of web application is tough especially when the programming language cannot easily be integrated with database and server. However, in LAMP no such issues occurs as it implements PHP which makes it feasible to expand LAMP web apps.

2 – Cost Factor :

As every level in LAMP stack is open-source, a project can be completed with minimum development and hardware costs.Moreover, there are other opensource projects available in LAMP stack such as Joomla, Drupal, OS Commerce, so you can choose a suitable option and deploy a project based on your requirements. This brings the project cost further low.

3 – Platform independent :

LAMP code works on wide range of operating systems and therefore it is platform independent. LAMP works on Windows, Linux, Android, and iOS easily.

Introducing MEAN Stack development :

MEAN Stack is a collection of Javascript-based software stack applied for building dynamic websites and web applications. MEAN is an acronym where M is MongoDB, E for Express.js, A for Angular JS, and N for Node.js. It is a free and open source stack designed to provide developers with a fast and organized technique of creating rapid prototypes of MEAN based web technologies.

One of the major advantages is the same Javascript language that runs on every tier of applications.

Benefits of MEAN Stack development :

1 – High Flexibility :

MEAN stack enables efficient development of isomorphic code as it implements Javascript all through. For instance, if you develop a code in Node.js and later if you plan to move your code to AngularJS you can easily do it without altering anything within the code.

MongDB itself enhances the flexibility of MEAN stack.It is a rigid database layer with automatic sharing and full cluster suport functionalities.Hence, you can host your project on cloud.

2 – Advantage of JSON :

MEAN stack development can be beneficial for with JSON. When you choose Angular JS or MongoDB it allows seamless data distribution between the layers. The data can be imported with the help of codes from MySQL server and process it.MEAN stack uses similar formats each time so when reformatting, it saves time. It also supports external APIs, so that you can choose to work with them when needed.

3 – Rapid MVP development :

A lot of frameworks, libraries, & reusable modules are available within the stack which increases the speed of development. With ready-made solutions, one just not only saves time but also makes the development less laborious.MEAN stack also offers a robust foundation to build scalable software products.

Comparison of LAMP Stack and MEAN Stack

Performance :

The database of stack is most responsible for performance and speed.With MySQL database, the app frequently suffers from high transaction loads bringing down the loading speed and overall performance.

In contrast to MEAN stack MongoDB is incredibly fast by trading off consistency it enhances the performance.MEAN stack is an ideal choice when a project can afford data loss once for achieving speed and flexibility.

Databases :

MySQL, the database layer of LAMP stack is a conventional database system which lacks optimization for fast-paced app development with quick response rate and flexibility.

MEAN stack allows you to work on a single non-relational database – MongoDB. It does not store data in tables rather it features a document-based query model. Nowadays developers prefer MongoDB in comparison to relational databases to accelerate and secure data easily.

Front-end and Back-end Development :

With LAMP stack you need to hire javascript developers for building Frontend apps while for backend you need PHP or Perl developers. In addition to this LAMP stack comes with various layers of navigation to access different configuration files and to use different syntax while programming.This makes the development complex and slower.

In case of MEAN stack development, you just need a Javascript developer for programming both frontend and backend as its all Javascript across the stack.

Scalability :

LAMP stack involves MySQL database with lot of requests and high concurrency rate the performance of MySQL slows down. With lower input and output ratio it performs better but when the ratio is scaled up the performance becomes sluggish.

In the other hand, MEAN stack has superb advantages with respect to scaling of performance with number of inputs growing up.As the rate of concurrency increases, the stack is able to scale up the database, frontend and backend.Apart from this, MongoDB provides support to auto-failover and auto-sharding to distribute the data uniformly with automatic rearranging. This aids in scaling up the performance as the number of requests rises.

EndNote :

Your game changing ideas need top-notch execution. It’s essential to indulge yourself with partners who will deliver a great product according to your requirements that results in significant ROI. Many enterprises realised that LAMP stack is not flexible enough to serve their purposes, so they are gradually moving towards MEAN stack and its high time you should too.

Deciding the right technology stack between LAMP and MEAN stack development is crucial to achieve your desired results.At the end, software built on right technology results in better performance, easier integration, faster development and increased satisfaction of your clients.

Well, you’re just one step away. Fortunesoft IT Innovations specializes in providing MEAN Stack development services. Contact us to discuss your project today!

0 notes

qdexitechnology · 5 years ago

Text

PHP vs. Node.Js: Choosing the Best for Web Development

Should I choose PHP or Node.Js? This is one never ending debate. Have you also got stuck here? The web development services offered by the professionals can be helpful here. You must agree with me that web development is diverse and ever-changing field. We keep getting new technologies and tools on regular basis. This makes it confusing to choose the right one. In this blog, we will be talking about PHP and Node.Js and their key features. This would help you understand which technology will be suitable for your web development project. Let’s move on to that.

Which Technology You Should Choose For Your Next Web Project?

Node.Js

As the runtime environment of JavaScript, Node.Js is one popular platform that consists of everything required to execute the program written in JavaScript. Node.Js is one brilliant open-source community. At present, you can use JavaScript than simply creating the interactive websites. This has now ability to do the things other than scripting. So, many client-side framework such as Angular, Ember and React are written in JavaScript. You can hire Java Development Services from professionals.

By using Node.js server-side, you can take advantages of single scripting language across application development stack. Another good thing about Node.Js is that it has very few dependencies, restrictions and guidelines. It comes with the some specific conventions which enables developers to choose the best structure, design patterns, features and modules for your web development project.

PHP

PHP is known as Hypertext Preprocessor. This is one open-source scripting language that is used for the back end development. PHP can be merged with HTML only. This has powerful code base that includes platforms for the development of websites and web development frameworks. In order to use PHP for web application with technology stack, the developers must have knowledge about four syntax system along with CSS and HTML. You can hire PHP development services to make the most out of this technology.

Comparing PHP and Node.Js: Battle Begins

Application Domain: This is the factor where PHP wins the race over Node.Js. If there are application where we don’t have any kind of interaction between server and client-side then its best to using PHP. On the other hand, if there is constant interaction between both sides then Node.Js is superior option.

Best Applications for PHP:

Content Management Systems

Applications that utilize LAMP stack in API development

For development of CPU-intensive applications

Best Application for Node.Js:

Development of single page application including resume portfolio as well as websites.

Creation of scalable server-side application

Real-time application like video streaming applications and chat applications.

Execution Speed and Code Type

If we talk about PHP then it is mostly synchronous. However, it has some APIs that respond in an asynchronous way. If any line with synchronous code has a function which is taking too much time to execute then the remaining code has to wait. It would increases the overall time of execution.

On the other hand, Node.js code is asynchronous. It clearly means that whole JS engine works on the code at once. With Node.Js there is no special requirement to wait till the execution is completed by the function. Hence, we can conclude that Node.js is fast in comparison with the PHP code.

Take Assistance From Experts!

Qdexi Technology is the superior web development company brings you the team of competent team of web developers who are skilled to work with variants of technologies. In the end if you are not able to decide on one of these technologies then stop waiting and get in touch with them today!

#web development company #php development services #web development

0 notes

infinijith · 6 years ago

Text

Angular vs React: Which is better for Your Application?

JavaScript as language climbed to the first rank on GitHub. it used continuously across different applications but not just for front end application development but also for back-end, building mobile application and even for building an AI application.

There is too much JavaScript framework, but Angular and React are a most popular JavaScript frame in these days

To use this in your application in a much more efficient way, you need to understand how they work, what they offer and in which way they benefit you.

Let's discuss to know which JavaScript will suit for developing your web application.

Angular

Angular is an open-source front-end development framework. Angular framework is based on the typescript. It developed and maintained by Google. It is initially released in October 2010.Angular 2 was a complete rewrite of the framework, started to use typescript. With angular uses a custom filter and more component driven.

It is a part of MEAN stack and is compatible with a large number of code editors and is considered for creating dynamic websites and web apps.

Benefits of Angular Front-End Development Framework

Cleaner Code

Angular uses TypeScript programming language, which is a superset of JavaScript. It compiles JavaScript, but also ease the process of finding and eliminating the common issues while typing the code.

This approach helps the developers in writing cleaner and error-free codes and ensure high code quality, something that is really helpful when investing in Enterprise app development.

Code Reusability

Angular Facilitate to reuse the same code by the developers. It saves the developers time and reuses the functionalities as developers want. This is one of the reasons why angular is preferred more than any other framework.

Higher Performance

Angular comes with hierarchical dependency injection, in that classes are not dependent on each other which helps in delivering high performance.

Lesser Timeline

Even though angular is a new technology it is derived from HTML that makes angular easier to learn and code. Even it requires less time for coding the entire application. It makes the creation of new applications easier with Angular with less effort.

Anyone can get started creating a simple application with angular by adding a few attributes to the HTML code in less span of time.

Simple Architecture

Angular development is considered as the simpler design architecture which is used nowadays and easy to catch up for any

angular developers

and enhance the features to any extent which the client requires. It works extremely well when it comes to managing the heavy web applications that contain several components and complex requirements

Convenient Testing

It supports for both end-to-end and unit testing. Angular made the testing process easy and flexible at any level of development. Have great testing compatibilities.

Better Error HandlingThe

latest version of Angular, i.e. Angular 7 also offers features like an upgraded error handling process for @Output in the scenarios where a property is not initialized.

Seamless Updates

Angular CLI is easy to install and use. It comes with innovative testing tools and simple command. It also makes an update on components having a third-party dependency.

Angular comes with incredible tools making it easy to rapidly build features with simple, declarative templates. Read our about Advantage of choosing Angularto know more about the benefits of Angular framework.

React

React is a twistable and flexible interface created and maintained by Facebook. It is open-source a library which is released in March 2013 and is mostly used as a JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

React is based on JavaScript and JSX (a PHP extension) widely in developing reusable HTML elements for front-end. React help in bringing component-based architecture to the game word. It is easy to maintain than any other architecture.

React has two frameworks which are ReactJs which is used for a web application development and React- native used for mobile application development. We will see here about ReactJs and how they help in building web application development.

Benefits of React JavaScript Library

Better User Experience

Unlike other JavaScript frameworks, React uses the Virtual DOM – the abstract form of Real DOM. This makes it easier for the React app developers to update changes performed by the users in the application without affecting the other parts of the interface.This results in building a highly dynamic UI with the exquisite user experience.

Time-Saving

In the case of React, the app development companies can reuse the code components at distinct levels at any point in time. Besides, the components are isolated to each other and changes in one does not affect the other which makes it easier to manage the updates.

This makes the React app development easier, time-saving, and efficient for developers.

Quick Development

React allows the developers to reuse the existing code and apply hot reloading into the process. This approach not only improves app performance but also accelerates the development speed.

Faster Testing

React make uses Redux which makes storing and managing a component convenient in the applications with enormous dynamic elements.

It helps the developers to add application state in a single object and empower every component of the app to access the application state without involving child components or using callback. This makes it easier to test the application and log data changes, along with the use of hot reloading and other such tools.

Performance

React takes advantage of one-way data binding with Flux controls. Flux help in updating the view for the user and control the application workflow.

To update the view for a user it makes use of virtual DOM and compares the new data with original DOM which in turn automatically updates the view.

Code Stability

React let the developers work directly with the components and employ downward data binding to ensure that the parent entities do not get affected by the changes of child entities.

Ease of Migration

When engineers and managers collaboratively decide upon migrating from an older technological infrastructure to a new one, certain questions arise on the level of effort and time required in performing the task.

React is lightweight and practically wrapped around the same JavaScript standards that made developers and managed alike, to fall in love with this language in the first place. React code can be added anywhere onto existing infrastructure without worry of shutting down the system for maintenance and also less dependency to reinvent the wheel.

Read our blog 7 Reason why ReactJS is preferred? To get to know why you need to use React for web application development.

React vs Angular: A Comparison Between the Two Front-End Development

Factors to compared for deciding the right Framework

User Experience

Error Handling

Quick Implementation

Data-Binding

Performance

Dependency Injection

Directives and HTML Templates

Time-saving

Reusable Code

Ease of Code Maintenance:

Data Binding

User Experience

Angular used Real DOM. Here, whenever a user updates anything in the single data structure, then it will be affected in the entire tree. This is useful in some cases, while troublesome in other cases.

On the other hand, react make use Virtual DOM. It allows React app developers to update the changes made by the users in the app without affecting any other part of the interface.

Error Handling

Smart and Better Error Handling have also improved in the latest version such Angular v7 which bestows unique error handling processes for output. The feature Error handler works effectively in the scenario where the property is not initialized.

React has also introduced components like Error Boundaries which quickly detect an error in the child tree and log those errors. However, you can detect an error during rendering, and that gives an edge to Angular.

Quick Implementation

The angular framework provides a lot of native options and features. Hence, you will be able to choose various options instantly. This will help you initiate the project without being overwhelmed by the number of choices you take during the startup.

In React, you have to take the support of various external component libraries to get the same features as Angular. For this, you have to add elements of routing, call to APIs, manage dependencies, etc.

Data-Binding

Angular utilizes a two-way data binding that binds Document Object Model (DOM) values to model data. This shows that whenever the user interacts with an input field and initiates a value to the app, then both view and model will be updated. This will further help you write less boilerplate code to make interactions between the components of the app.

React supports one-way data binding. It offers singular behavior for your application. Hence, you can easily know where data is changed. This also helps to reduce complexity. Also, it is simple to debug self-contained components of big React apps as compared to big Angular apps.

If you want to enable the unidirectional flow of data in React, Facebook has built its own app architecture known as Flux. Flux manages the flow of data from one end, mainly called a dispatcher. Flux’s dispatcher acquires an object and sends it to a proper store, which then updates itself.

Performance

Angular creates a watcher to look after all the modifications done in DOM. When view starts getting updates, Angular compares the newly obtained value with the old ones. The main issue here is that it checks all the values that are changed along with older values that are tracked via watchers.

React consists of virtual DOM which enables building light DOM tree and saves it to the server. When a user interacts with the website, for instance filling a form, React builds a new virtual DOM and compares it with the earlier saved DOM.

After this, the library finds all the things that are different between the two models and creates a virtual DOM again, however with a changed HTML. This complete process is done on the server which reduces the load on the browser.

Dependency Injection

Angular automatically finds appropriate injected objects and components such as factory, value, constant, service, and provide using parameters like route Params, filter, store, and $scope. Dependency injection is possible in the Angular framework with the help of two components: $inject and $provide.React doesn’t provide any option for a built-in container for dependency injection. However, you don’t have to find any way to inject dependencies instantly in your react project. You can take the help of some tools to inject dependencies instantly in a React app.

Directives and HTML Templates

Angular comprises its directives to work on DOM. The two most standard directives present in Angular include ng-bind and ng-app. Also, you can build your own directives as well. In short, you can use specific and standard directives to bind DOM elements into Angular apps. Unlike Angular, React doesn’t provide any division into templates and directives or template logic. Here, template logic should be written in a template only.

Time-Saving: reusable code, code maintains

Developers actually get irritated as they have to be dependent on various variations. However, in the case of Angular, developers need to learn a particular way of doing things, and it will also provide improved performance at a lower cost. Let’s check out some facts;

1. Reusable Code:

Most of the Angular code can be reused and therefore, you don’t need to invent the fresh one for projects.When you build projects using the React library, you can save comprehensive-time and money. Most code components can be reused anytime at distinct levels.

2. Ease of Code Maintenance:

Angular uses components and modules which make Angular code maintenance very easy.On the other hand, components remain isolated from each other that enables developers to make changes in the components independently changes in one will not affect the other.Angular or React, which is better for your applicationChoose React for your project if:

If you want to expand the functionality of your application in the future

If you're going to use more dynamic content which make the changes on views

You agree with a slower initial phase of development

Choose Angular for your project if:

You are in the inception phase of development.

If you want to get start your development quickly

If your application needs much robust and well-maintained framework of any rang.

Conclusion

In web development is hard to find, which is better than others. It depends on the fact of what you want and how you want rather that which is better.

If you like to have simplicity in development and flexibility, then go with

React application development. But if you looking for an effective way of managing and scalability with more features than get along with Angular.

In general, both angular and React are great for building apps. both offer different tools to build either web or mobile applications. Based on your project you can select these tools to make your application. Try to use the best fit tool for your application instead of jamming your application with tools that complicate the development.

Infinijth offers you both the JavaScript for building the application. Even you will suggest you with the best fit for your application from the pool of development framework.

Originally published at https://www.infinijith.com/blog/angular/angular-vs-react on 11 December, 2019

0 notes

deltainfoteklive · 2 years ago

Text

Which is More Paid The Frontend or Backend?

0 notes

landbase8-blog · 6 years ago

Text

Vue.js vs Angular: Which JavaScript Framework to Choose?

JavaScript frameworks are changing the scenario of the front-end development world. They are proving to have the potential to build cross-platform mobile apps with ease and better future considerations. However, not all the JS frameworks are enjoying the same limelight in the marketplace. While php project topics like Vue and Ember have entered the market and are gaining momentum with their exceptional options, frameworks like jQuery and Aurelia are losing their charm in the JavaScript world. They are struggling with getting the attention of the mobile app developers – a mandate for remaining in the development world. In such mca projects in android where JavaScript frameworks are losing the market at a considerably higher pace than they enter into the market, keeping yourself abreast with what are the best JavaScript frameworks in 2019 can act as a helping hand in curating a profitable future in the marketplace. And when talking about the JavaScript frameworks to consider in 2019, looking at the two popular frameworks, Angular and Vue, and seeing how to choose the right option among them can be worthwhile. Taking the same thought forward, we will have a brief look of both the JavaScript frameworks and look into Vue.js vs Angular comparison in this article. So, here we begin with the first section, i.e, the brief introduction of Angular and Vue. A Basic Overview of Angular and Vue.js Overview of Angular and Vue.js Backed by Google, Angular is an open-source framework considered for building dynamic websites and applications. android app ideas falls under the category of MEAN stack and is supportable with a wide range of code editors. Whereas, the answer to what is Vue is that it is an open-source framework created by Evan You for tackling the challenges associated with Angular and React JS frameworks. The framework is highly recognised in the market for developing a simple page web application. Both these JavaScript application frameworks are loved by various reputed brands for reaping higher profits of the mobile market, including:- Reputed brands for reaping higher profits of the mobile market While there can be various reasons behind why these brands have adopted Angular and Vue.js, a few of them are stated below:- Benefits of Considering Angular Development Framework Angular proves to be the right JS framework to rely upon for your app needs with pros such as:- Server-Side Rendering Angular JS framework offers better Server-Side Rendering (SSR) features that improve the page speed on the client side. This makes the JS framework more SEO-friendly. Separation of Concerns Angular follows the MVC model, which makes it good for separation of concerns and cleaner faster development. android projects ideas Linking Module The framework provides developers with an extensive linking module for single page app development that assists in understanding of how Ajax works and introducing its advantages into your app project. Tools and Filters Last but not least, the Angular framework makes it possible to easily blend various tools and filters into the development environment. This delivers a high-speed front-end experience. Testing and Maintenance The Angular IO framework comes with advanced refactoring and debugging options that aid developers in the testing and maintenance process. Besides, it renders the opportunity to test the complete project with a single testing tool like Jasmine, Karma and Protractor. This cut down the hassle of developers and ensure highly-effective results. Update Scope with CLI As we have already seen in our article React vs Angular covered a few months ago, Angular CLI is easy to install and use. It also serves mobility experts with simpler commands and effective testing tools and is supported by several engineers and platforms that make it possible to update all the app components – including those having dependency on third-party libraries and APIs. While these features favor choosing Angular for front-end development, it’s good to have a glance at the benefits of Vue.js to determine what to consider in Vue.js vs Angular to do justice to your app needs. Advantages of Going with Vue.js

0 notes

mbaljeetsingh · 5 years ago

Text

100 Jamstack Tools, APIs & Services to Power Your Sites

We’ve explained the Jamstack, a popular new way to build secure, scalable, high-performance sites. Now we’ll introduce you to the tools, services, and APIs that power Jamstack sites.

The A in Jamstack stands for API. APIs can do anything for you, from sending a form to authenticating a user, or from storing and retrieving data in real time to shopping for products.

In this article, we’ll do an extensive review of existing APIs and how they compare to one another. This review couldn’t possibly encompass the whole spectrum of third-party APIs that you can integrate into your website, but hopefully you’ll still find the coverage enlightening enough.

We’ll use the words “headless”, “detached”, and “serverless” a lot in this article. If you haven’t already, check out our introduction to the Jamstack, which covers all the basics.

Hosting (Mostly for Free)

Provided: Netlify

Hosting a Jamstack site usually involves automated deployment pipelines. For example, you might have a repository in GitHub which, on every push, automatically triggers an online deployment (via webhooks), running the necessary build tools (such as Jekyll) and regression tests (via Travis CI).

Sound difficult? It can be a surprisingly simple process!

Most of the services here include these goodies out of the box:

SSD drives

CDN deployments

free SSL (including for custom domains)

command line deployments and rollbacks

Note: look out for another article in this series, coming soon, covering how to use these services.

Services

Google Firebase and AWS Amplify

Firebase Hosting is Google’s take on a hosting service that’s easy to understand and implement, and it’s free to use (limits apply). Firebase’s backbone actually lies on top of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and you can in fact access and tweak some Firebase deployments through the GCP console. But by implementing something of an “gateway” (Firebase) that transparently handles GCP resources for us, Google gave developers a brand new and highly improved user experience (UX) … and the Firebase’s YouTube channel is just brilliant! 👏

AWS Amplify is also an effort to reduce the complexities of Amazon Web Services (AWS) for web and mobile deployment that doesn’t quite offer free hosting but 12 months of free use for new accounts for its Storage with Amplify as part of the AWS Free Tier.

Google really made a brilliant move with the Firebase family of products by “detaching” them from the GCP, but Amazon went half-way with AWS Amplify. It sure is a dramatic improvement from the regular AWS workflow, especially for novice users, and its documentation hub is superb and way more down-to-earth than the way Amazon usually documents services. But Amplify is still accessed from the same old (horrifically bloated) console. You still need a credit card to just open an account, deployments are still region-specific (no built-in CDN, seriously?), and the workflow isn’t as straightforward when compared to that of Firebase or Netlify.

GitHub Pages and GitLab Pages

Both hosting services for Git repositories also have a built-in service to host static pages right out of your codebases, 100% free: GitHub Pages and GitLab Pages.

In a future article we’ll cover how to use these services, but in the meantime make sure to check out these easy-to-follow guides:

Getting Started with GitHub Pages

Hosting on GitLab.com with GitLab Pages

Netlify and Heroku

In a very short period of time, Netlify not only coined the Jamstack term but also positioned itself as the place to go for all things static. While you could certainly accomplish more with an elaborated AWS pipeline, the simplicity and unparalleled ease of use that Netlify offers is unbeatable. Want to host a static site? Just drop it here and it’s online. Want automatic updates? Link a repo and just push a commit. And batteries are included — instant builds, worldwide CDN, free SSL, CLI tool, on-click rollbacks, and more.

Heroku is the only service in this list that allows you to host dynamic pages: Node.js, Ruby, Python, Java, PHP, Go, Scala and Clojure (check their Language Support page). So if you aren’t yet quite ready to go static, this might be a good way to test your dynamic sites online for free.

Others Services

With 194 data centers as of 2020, Cloudflare is — by many metrics — the company that offers the lowest latency for their DNS and CDN services around the world. They serve big companies but also have a number of services oriented to developers, like Workers Sites. The service isn’t free ($5/mo minimum charge) but it’s as top performant as you can get, and fairly easy to use.

Other tools targeted at static pages include Aerobatic, which offers a free trial with no credit card required and support for internationalization (i18n) and full-text search built-in plugins; Surge.sh with npm run scripts and CI services; and Vercel (formerly ZEIT Now) with an Edge Network serving big names such as Twilio and The Washington Post.

Comparison

Service Free plan Easy-of-use Tooling Aerobatic 1 month easy good Firebase Hosting yes easy very good GitHub Pages completely free easy poor GitLab Pages completely free easy good Heroku yes somewhat easy very good Netlify yes extremely easy very good Storage with Amplify 1-year (new accounts) somewhat easy very good Surge.sh yes easy good Vercel yes easy good Workers Sites no somewhat easy good

Storing and Retrieving Data: Real-time NoSQL Databases

NoSQL solutions like MongoDB have been coexisting with relational databases like MySQL for some time (see the differences and how to choose), but real-time processing takes NoSQL to the next level by enabling cloud storage for state management, such as a user entering their name or clicking a radio button.

If you’re familiar with Redux and Vuex — React and Vue.js libraries for state management, respectively — think of integrating that concept with a cloud storage provider.

Services

Amazon DynamoDB is a “fully managed, multiregion, multimaster, durable database with built-in security, backup and restore, and in-memory caching for internet-scale applications”. But as with many things AWS, it’s difficult to implement and very hard to debug (see Why Amazon DynamoDB isn’t for everyone, by Forrest Brazeal). In all fairness to Amazon, they also built DataStore into AWS Amplify (with GraphQL and REST API support) with a more straightforward approach, in line with the simplicity of the rest of Amplify’s products.

Google Firestore made real-time NoSQL databases — a fairly complex topic in and of itself — as simple as they can be, with pretty much all the capabilities DynamoDB has. It’s very well documented (with introductory clips that are fun to watch). And React and Vue.js have wrappers around Firestore with react-redux-firebase and Vuexfire, respectively.

Cloudflare sure knows how to take performance to the very extreme, and Workers KV, a serverless key-value storage for applications, is a fine example of what a well engineered product looks like. The premise of Workers KV is that you can access a key as if it were a local file within your app, and the content will be the value stored for that key. That’s it — no API to implement, no extra coding. And because of the unbeatable performance of the Cloudflare CDN, this approach can actually be faster than querying a NoSQL database. And as simple as it is, it scales seamlessly to millions of requests. 👏

And finally, there’s FaunaDB, a startup that crafted a solution with native GraphQL and a simple pricing (including a free plan) that can be implemented in minutes.

Managing Content: Headless CMS

In the “monolithic” way of doing things, whenever we used a given content management system — such as WordPress, Django, or Joomla! — it meant that we also needed to use the front-end engine that came attached to it, as back and front end were “coupled” components of a single piece of software (see our introduction to the Jamstack for more info about tightly vs loosely coupled sites).

Enter the headless CMS — a back end only without a front end. Since a headless CMS would normally expose an API or generate static content in the way of Markdown or HTML files, the front end can be anywhere really. In fact, multiple and simultaneous interfaces can be created for web sites, mobile apps, and Internet of Things (IoT) apps.

Products and Services

There are a number of headless CMSs, both as software you can download and configure where you do the deployments yourself, or offered in the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model where everything is taken care of for you.

Some features you can expect to find:

localization (l10n) and internationalization (i18n)

microservices architecture with a RESTful API

editor interface

customization

versioning*

* Since some headless CMS will integrate smoothly with your git repo, the versioning capability can actually be a remarkable improvement over a regular CMS.

Self-hosted Headless CMS

Ghost, “the #1 open source headless Node.js CMS”, is certainly the one with the most stars on GitHub. Not only can Ghost handle content, but it also offers a number of integrations to manage payments (Stripe), email lists (MailChimp), shopping (Shopify), and many more. And then there’s Ghost(Pro), which is the official managed hosting for Ghost with commercial support.

Fairly close to Ghost in popularity comes Strapi, with REST and GraphQL APIs, and 1-click deployments on Heroku, AWS, and DigitalOcean. It has “starters” (template projects) to work seamlessly with Gatsby, Vue.js with Nuxt.js, React with Next.js, and Angular. It also runs on Node.js and has support for a number of database engines.

Netlify CMS is also a popular option built as a single–page React app. There’s Directus, which wraps custom SQL databases with an API and provides an intuitive admin app to manage its content, and the commercial companion Directus Cloud. There’s also TinaCMS, which is also React-based, and Ponzu, Copckpit, and many more, which you can explore oin the comprehensive list provided by headlesscms.org.

SaaS Headless CMS

CloudCannon is the cloud CMS for Jekyll (we’ll review Jekyll later in the “static site generators” section), with smooth integration with GitHub, Bitbucket and Dropbox. They have a free plan as well but with no global CDN hosting.

Contentful is something different: a content hub where business owners, marketers, developers and project managers can all go to set and manage all of the data sources of an organization. And their headless CMS is just a part of that strategy. The Contentful platform is fully featured, very well documented, with plenty of open-source tools. And while the pricing is a bit confusing, there’s actually a free plan that only requires attribution.

There are other SaaS headless CMSs with free plans, such as DatoCMS and Sanity with a proposition similar to that of Contentful; Forestry, with support for a number of static generators; GraphCMS, with GraphQL support; and Prismic. These are just a few of the many options.

Sending Information: Forms without Code

Sending data through forms has forever been one of the main uses for server-side processing. There are essentially two approaches to addressing this problem on a static site, each with pros and cons.

From Builders, Embedded and Hosted Forms

Many times integrating a “powered by” external form is more than enough to collect email addresses or to receive feedback.

Google Forms have offered this possibility since 2008 entirely for free, with a simple interface that stores submissions on Google Sheets, and that can send alerts via email every time there’s a submission.

Formstack takes forms to another level by providing an integrated workflow supporting digital signatures, document generation, Salesforce integration, and more. They offer a free tryout but no free plans.

Then you have the extremely easy-to-use form builders JotForm and Wufoo, which integrate handling payments, among other things, or Typeform, which makes forms and surveys … pretty? All of them offer free plans.

External API: Form Processing as a Service (FPaaS)

Sometimes a builder won’t cut it, as you need more flexibility to present information and fields, or to fully integrate the look and feel of the form with the rest of your website. For this you will need to integrate an API.

The way these services work is surprisingly easy: you specify a URL for submission that will do the processing for you. At most you’ll have to set a few things up but most probably won’t need to do any extra coding.

There are a number of providers offering free plans, such as Form.IO, Formcarry, Formspark, and Netlify Forms. They all work in a similar way and are very easy to implement.

FormDen and FormKeep are also form builders that can otherwise be used just as back ends, though none of them offer free plans.

Programming Server-Side Logic: Function as a Service (FaaS)

Couldn’t find an API that does quite what you want? Create it! You don’t need to resort back to a hosted back-end system to process server-side logic, with all the hassle that comes with it (maintenance, bills, credentials, security patches). Instead, you can implement a micro-service in your language of choice (oftentimes JavaScript, Python, or Go), encapsulate that logic into functions, and offer them through a RESTful API.

As with pretty much everything else in this list, you won’t be paying anything for a function that’s not being actively used, so no worries for just leaving it sitting there (but beware that spikes in traffic might also trigger extra billing).

Providers

While the implementation details for AWS Lambda, Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions may differ, they all work in pretty much the same fashion and you’ll need a degree of familiarity with AWS, Azure or GCP. AWS Lambda has the richest language support of them all (and also Amazon API Gateway to help you wrap your functions into a maintainable API with monitoring tools), while Azure — not surprisingly — has the best support for .NET Framework and .NET Core (with different versions supporting different runtimes and even TypeScript transpiled to JavaScript). But be aware that Azure systematically ranks as the slowest service by a margin.

Cloud Functions for Firebase and Netlify Functions are wrappers around Google Cloud Functions and AWS Lambda, respectively. They greatly simplify the management of functions on the cloud, as you effectively can get away without even having an account on such services. Code deployment and versioning become trivial with Netlify — which also has very good community support — as it will smoothly integrate with your repo offering stage, previewing, and rolling back at a click (or a commit). Simplicity naturally comes at the expense of losing some flexibility (see Firebase Cloud Functions: the great, the meh, and the ugly by Pier Bover).

IBM Cloud Functions (based on Apache OpenWhisk) and Cloudflare Workers are other services you might want to look at. IBM has an impressive list of supported languages, including the option to deploy Docker containers with your own runtime. However, it ranked somewhat poorly performance wise. And just as Netlify systematically manages to make things the simplest, Cloudflare again makes things the fastest (and by a difference).

Comparison

service languages overhead* coldstart* difficulty support AWS Lambda C#, Go, Java, JavaScript, PowerShell, Python, Ruby 86 ms 🟢 589 ms high 👍 very good Azure Functions C#, F#, Java, JavaScript and TypeScript, PowerShell, Python 760 ms 🔴 5,907 ms 🔴 high 👎 very poor Cloud Functions for Firebase JavaScript and TypeScript 642 ms 🔴 168 ms low 👍 very good Cloudflare Workers JavaScript, COBOL 70 ms 🟢 76 ms 🟢 intermediate intermediate Google Cloud Functions Go, Java, Node.js, Python 642 ms 🔴 168 ms high 👍 very good IBM Cloud Functions .C#, Go, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, Swift, and Docker containers 136 ms 2,103 ms 🔴 high no info Netlify Functions Go, Node.js 86 ms 🟢 589 ms very low 👍 very good

* As measured by λ Serverless Benchmark, the overhead is the time from request to response without the time the function took (for a concurrency of 50), and the coldstart is how long the servers takes to respond when queried are spanned every 3 hours; the lower the values, the better.

Authenticating Users: Identity as a Service

Identity as a Service (IDaaS), also called sometimes Authentication as a Service (AaaS), involves managing a full user registration, confirmation, and authentication with just APIs. The Geist of “stateless authentication” is that a user will authenticate against a third-party and come back to you with a valid “token” that you can verify, or revoke if need be.

In some cases, a provider might even offer a “drop-in” user interface (UI) that will work seamlessly across desktop and mobile, all of which could potentially save you very long hours of work.

Services

Auth0 has been in business the longest and has quickstart guides for a number of scenarios. It’s an excellent provider if you want to implement a complex solution and already have some experience implementing authentication. But as they point out, “identity is complex, deal with it”. The large scope Auth0 services (universal login, single sign on (SSO), multifactor authentication, branch password detection, and so on) can be overwhelming if you’re just starting on the topic.

Firebase Authentication (with its ready-to-use UI) and Authentication with Amplify are also very comprehensive and flexible, and somewhat presented in a more straightforward manner than Auth0. Firebase also offers anonymous authentication! Curious? Check out this clip:

youtube

Once again, Netlify seems to come up with the easiest solution to implement with Netlify Identity and its open-source zero config netlify-identity-widget to create a secure login in 10 minutes! But of course, there are some limitations (check out Four Dealbreakers in Netlify Identity, by Jean Cochrane).

You can also check Okta, FusionAuth and LoginRadius, all of which have free plans. There are no freebies for Ping Identity, OneLogin, and Ubisecure, which are more oriented to the enterprise sector. Finally, consider Cloudflare Access, as everything Cloudflare does is rock solid.

Going F·A·S·T: Static Site Generators (SSG)

I can hear some of you saying “all of this might be okay for future projects, but my sites are already dynamic, so what to do?” Here’s when static site generators enter the picture.

You can have the best of both worlds — the convenience of a familiar CMS and static pages with code and data splitting, preloading, caching, image optimization, and all sorts of performance enhancements. An SSR will bridge that gap by querying your database and generating static output out of it (for example, Markdown pages), and with some settings to set your template, you’ll be all set.

The listing here is tiny compared to the ever increasing list of SSRs. Have a look at StaticGen for more info.

Main Products

GatsbyJS is powered by React.js and webpack, meaning that it can generate progressive web apps (aka PWAs, websites that look and feel like an apps). It also supports GraphQL (see Write Apps with Better Building Blocks) and it has +1,000 plugins to get data from anywhere (WordPress, Drupal, Contentful, GraphCMS, DatoCMS, and many more). See how GatsbyJS says it compares to its main competitors, Hugo and Jekyll.

All of this flexibility comes at a cost, as setting and customizing GatsbyJS can be a time-consuming process, and if you don’t have a decent understanding of React — and therefore JavaScript — you won’t be able to make much of it. That’s where Gatsby Cloud comes in, offering support to build and maintain Gatsby sites for free or for a fee, where you could automate your fast builds, access to previews, generate daily edits, and fire deployments with ease to Netlify, Cloudflare, AWS CloudFront or Akamai.

Hugo claims to be “the world’s fastest framework for building websites”, and it sure can generate massive sites in milliseconds. With built-in templates (literally hundreds of them available) and native support for internationalization (i18n), it’s also one of the most popular SSGs. Hugo is a Go app, and while Go isn’t hard to set and learn, you’ll definitely need to be checking the documentation often if you aren’t familiar with it.

Unlike GatsbyJS, configuring and deploying Jekyll is a rather straightforward process. Furthermore, Jekyll is the only SSR supported by GitHub Pages (Tom Preston-Werner, creator of Jekyll, is also a co-founder of GitHub), and can smoothly deploy static sites for free right out of your GitHub repos! Jekyll uses Shopify’s Liquid template language, which is also easy to learn. The downsides? As a Ruby app, Jekyll can be hard to set on a Windows environment, and optimizations such as minimizing JavaScript code and image preloading aren’t included by default. In fact, Jekyll doesn’t even aim at generating a PWA but just purely static sites — which might still be fine depending on what you need.

Comparison

Product Language Templating Setting GitHub stars GatsbyJS JavaScript React.js difficult

Hugo Go Go (library) intermediate

Jekyll Ruby Liquid easy

Others

WP2Static is an SSR designed specifically for WordPress (WP). It has a small but very interesting set of plugins, like Algolia search, and Cloudflare Workers and Netlify deployments. HardyPress is actually a SaaS solution to generate static WP sites, and for a fee you’ll have an admin panel from where you can enter some credentials to access your online WP installations to manage everything: shut down live WP installs that were already imported, transparent deployment to global a CDN, HTTPS, forms, search. Other WP-related SSGs with commercial support are Shifter, Strattic, and Sitesauce.

Since I am admittedly biased towards Vue.js, I had to include VuePress, which is intended to generate single page applications (SPAs) and has a minimal setup with markdown-centered files, and it’s also powered by webpack. Gridsome and Nuxt.js are more featured Vue.js powered frameworks with SSR capabilities.

Selling and Processing Payments: Headless Shopping Carts

The architecture and benefits of headless ecommerce is not that different from that of a headless CMS: massive cost reduction (hosting, licenses, maintenance), less time to market, seamless integration, and — a big one for commerce — “omnichannel” capabilities.

Continue reading 100 Jamstack Tools, APIs & Services to Power Your Sites on SitePoint.

via SitePoint https://ift.tt/3fUHoNL

#IFTTT #Feedly

0 notes