#Punjab and Haryana High Court

[news-folds]

HC grants bail to NDPS case accused, says speedy trial constitutional right

HC grants bail to NDPS case accused, says speedy trial constitutional right

The Punjab and Haryana High Court (HC) while granting bail to an NDPS case accused, who has been in custody for nearly three-and-a-half years, said that speedy trial is constitutional right of the accused. The Bench of Justice Vikas Bahl, while hearing the second bail petition filed by Gaurav Gandhi, booked on March 21, 2019, under Sections 21/61/29/85 of NDPS Act and Section 201 of IPC,…

[rudrjobdesk]

पैरोल पर छूटा राम रहीम असली या नकली? HC ने कहा- लगता है याचिकाकर्ताओं ने फिक्शन फिल्म देख ली है

रोहतक की सुनारिया जेल से एक माह की पैरोल पर बाहर आए बलात्कार के दोषी और डेरा सच्चा सौदा प्रमुख गुरमीत राम रहीम सिंह (Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh) को (डमी) नकली बताने वाली याचिका पंजाब और हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने सोमवार को खारिज कर दी। याचिका में राम रहीम सिंह को एक ‘डमी’ (नकली) के साथ बदलने का आरोप लगाया गया था। हाईकोर्ट ने इस याचिका को बेबुनियाद बताते हुए खारिज कर दिया और याचिकाकर्ताओं को कड़ी फटकार भी…

[technoajay]

"कोई वकील मेरे बेटे का मुकदमा लड़ने को तैयार नहीं," गैंगस्टर लॉरेंस बिश्नोई के पिता का आरोप

“कोई वकील मेरे बेटे का मुकदमा लड़ने को तैयार नहीं,” गैंगस्टर लॉरेंस बिश्नोई के पिता का आरोप

Image Source : FILE PHOTO Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi accepted that he is the mastermind behind the Sidhu Moosewla murder Highlights सिद्धू मूसेवाला हत्याकांड में जेल में बंद लॉरेंस बिश्नोई गैंगस्टर लॉरेंस बिश्नोई के पिता ने बड़ा आरोप लगाया पंजाब में वकील उनके बेटे का बहिष्कार कर रहे Sidhu Moosewala Case: सिद्धू मूसेवाला हत्याकांड में जेल में बंद गैंगस्टर लॉरेंस बिश्नोई के पिता ने बड़ा आरोप…

[snehasharma9631]

Punjab & Haryana High Court Clerk Admit Card 2022

Punjab & Haryana High Court Clerk Admit Card 2022, PHHC Clerk Exam Date, Download Punjab and Haryana high court Clerk Hall Ticket Name wise at www.sssc.gov.in from Today, 26.09.2022 

The Society for Centralized Recruitment of Staff in Subordinate Courts is conducting the Clerk written exam on the 3rd, 4th & 5th October 2022. The PPHC Admit card for Clerk Subordinate Courts of Punjab has been released. Aspirants visit this page carefully to download Punjab & Haryana SSSC Clerk Admit Card Name wise.

In this article, we have provided complete details for the Punjab Haryana High Court Clerk Exam Date. Contenders have to clear a written test and a Computer proficiency test. They have to provide necessary details like Name, Registration number, and date of birth to get the Punjab & Haryana High Court Clerk Admit Card 2022. It is very compulsory to bring the PHHC Clerk Exam Hall Ticket to the exam center along with one photo identity card.

For more visit www.latestjobhub.in

[best24news]

Ram Rahim: जमानत को लेकर पंजाब-हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने दिया ये ब्यान, जानिए अब क्या होगा

Ram Rahim: जमानत को लेकर पंजाब-हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने दिया ये ब्यान, जानिए अब क्या होगा

हरियाणा:  मर्डर व दो रैप के मामले में सजा काट रहे राम रहीम एक बार फिर सुर्खियो मे आ गए है। पंजाब-हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने राम रहीम को नियमित जमानत रद्द करने की मांग वाली सीबीआई की याचिका को खारिज कर दिया है। सीबीआई ने अपनी याचिका में कहा कि राम रहीम जेल में है। कई अन्य मामले लंबित हैं और उनमें से एक 400 से अधिक साधुओं को नपुंसक बनाने का मामला भी शामिल है। Haryana Election : बीरबल की खिचडी बने पंचायत…

[kupwaratimes-fan]

Muslim girls over 15 years of age can marry: Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds minor's love marriage

Muslim girls over 15 years of age can marry: Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds minor’s love marriage

Muslim girls over 15 years of age can marry: Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds minor’s love marriage Chandigarh: A newlywed Muslim couple — a 21-year-old boy and a 16-year-old girl — was granted protection by the Punjab And Haryana High Court last week with judges referring to the Muslim Personal Law under which the girl is of marriageable age. The Bench of Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi passed…

[metamatar]

October 10, 2022

Amit Kumar had everything going for him. After graduating in engineering and landing a decent job, Amit wanted to settle down with his childhood sweetheart Renu. The couple had known each other since Class IX and dreamt of a life together. The only difficulty was that Renu belonged to a Brahmin family and Amit was a Dalit.

With their homes barely a kilometre apart in Garhwa district of Jharkhand, Renu knew her family would never approve of the match. The couple decided to run away and tie the knot in another State. And thus began their tale of unending harassment and tragedy.

The couple married at a temple in Dehradun and got their marriage registered there. They had just about settled down at Paonta Sahib in Himachal Pradesh when, in a midnight raid, the Uttar Pradesh police took away Renu, claiming that she had been abducted. Amit and Renu have not seen or spoken to each other since that fateful night of August 13, 2021.

Amit’s life has been a quagmire of legal battles and dismissed habeas corpus petitions since then. “I fear my wife is no more,” he told The Hindu.

Activists say such tragic situations can be avoided if couples like Amit and Renu are provided safe houses and special protection by the State governments as mandated by the Supreme Court.

According to data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), the number of “honour killings” in the country was 24, 25 and 33 in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Punjab, Madhya Pradesh and Jharkhand topped the list in 2021 and 2020, while Manipur was on top in 2019.

The government in 2021 informed Parliament that there were 145 “honour killing” incidents in the country between 2017 and 2019.

Interestingly, though the NCRB report attributed only 25 deaths to “honour killings” in 2020, it said there were 27 deaths due to casteism and 1,558 due to “illicit relationship”. Similarly, in 2021, 33 deaths were listed under “honour killings”, but 1,544 and 1,532 under “illicit relationship” and “love affairs”, respectively.

So far, only Delhi, Haryana and Punjab have safe houses for inter-faith and inter-religious couples. Kerala has only announced the setting up of a safe house.

In fact, only 21 States have said that they have complied with the Supreme Court directives, which means that they have asked the police officers concerned of a State for strict compliance, according to Dhanak for Humanity, a non-governmental organisation which works with such couples, helping them solemnise their marriages and providing legal support.

The Supreme Court had in 2018 directed that safe houses be set up in every district as well as a special cell in States for couples facing opposition from families and community.

Gaurav Yadav, an engineer from IIT Chennai, said he was working with survivors of “honour crimes” and couples who are in hiding to petition the government for more safe houses across the country.

“Soon we will form an official grouping and petition the government to follow the Supreme Court directives on safe houses and special cells,” Mr. Yadav said, adding that he had organised a convention regarding the same in Delhi recently.

He said though couples had been demanding that safe houses be set up, the State administrations had looked the other way.

An example is of Ravikant Chandrawanshi and Alisha, who had a harrowing time getting married under the Special Marriage Act in Chhattisgarh.

The inter-faith couple at first decided to elope and marry in Bilaspur. However, a lack of support system and security, including finances, saw them return home in Kawardha within four days.

“As my wife’s family were well to do and politically connected, they kept up the pressure on us. Finally, we had to take legal recourse and approached the High Court asking them to direct the State administration to provide the mandated safe house and police protection.

“However, we were informed that there was no safe house and Alisha had to go to a sakhi centre or a women’s safe house,” Mr. Chandravanshi said.

Though the couple approached the highest of authorities, they were not given any police protection either and had to go into hiding for around six months after their marriage.

According to Asif Iqbal of Dhanak for Humanity, most States send the girl to a Nari Niketan after couples approach them. “It is here that the girl is the most insecure as her family mostly approaches her and puts pressure to go back. Many a time, this also leads to what is known as honour killing of the girl”.

Sanjay Sachadev of Love Commandoes, an organisation which rescues and shelters such couples, said, “The need of the hour is safe houses across the country. In almost every case, the police try and send the girl to a women’s shelter and the boy is left to fend for himself.”

A couple who are staying in a Delhi safe house and did not wish to be identified said that they could not have thought of living together had it not been for the security of the safe house.

Mr. Iqbal, whose organisation has helped many couples seek legal recourse to stay together and get married, said that of the distress calls he receives, the most were from Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan.

[seemabhatnagar]

Landlord ultimately succeeded

Krishan Lal & others v. Ashok Jain Decided by the Single Judge, Hon’ble Mr. Justice H S Madaan, High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. Order pronounced on 01.06.2023 dismissing the Revision of the Tenant.

#property#legal#businesss#rentcontrollerambala#evictionpetition#lanlord#tenant#justify#necessity#Appeal#HighCourtofPunjabandHaryanaatChandigarh#cogentandconvincingevidence To get the possession over his property the landlord has to fight a legal battle for years with his Tenant, ultimately, he succeeded and got possession of the shop. But in the process the Landlord has to justify his necessity before the Rent Controller Ambala. Rent Controller Ambala was not satisfied with the justification of the Landlord and dismissed the Eviction Petition. Aggrieved with the dismissal order, the petitioner-landlord filed Appeal. The Appellate Authority allowed the Appeal of the Landlord with direction to tenant to vacate the premise within 02 months failing which Landlord was given liberty to get the order executed by the Competent Court. Now tenant felt aggrieved with the order of eviction and filed Revision Petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The High Court after hearing the submission of the parties dismissed the Revision as devoid of merit and upheld the order of the Appellate Authority observing that Rent Controller Ambala clearly fell in error in drawing the inference that the petitioner had failed to lead any cogent, clinching and reliable evidence to prove that he required the shop in dispute for his bona fide need, whereas the landlord had brought sufficient cogent and convincing evidence to prove that he had a bona fide need of the shop and his such need was not just a wish. The #Landlord has given his #shop on rent to the father of the Petitioner who was running an Halwai shop at Nicholson Road Ambala Cantt. After the death of the father of the petitioner, his son stepped into the shoes and in fact changed their business as well. Rent from 2013 remained unpaid to the Landlord. Moreso, the son of the landlord wanted the shop for extension of his business of scientific medical equipment as he was having shop adjacent to the shop rented out to the tenant and his business was expanding. Hon’ble High Court observed that the law is well settled that a landlord is best judge of his requirement. The portion in possession of son of the landlord, where he is said to be doing business of scientific equipment is on the rear side of the shop in question and demised shop is in possession of revision petitioners as well as shop already sold by the landlord to some other person. If son of the landlord wants to expand his business in the demised shop having direct access to the road, there is nothing wrong in his such plans. He cannot be advised to find some other place for expansion of his business and allow the revision petitioners to keep possession of the shop in dispute.

Seema Bhatnagar

[theivorybilledwoodpecker]

The child is a testimony to her bruised body and soul, said the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowing a 26-week pregnant minor to terminate her pregnancy borne out of her rape. The court noted that the minor and her family had already expressed their unwillingness to raise the child. A bench of Justice Vinod S Bhardwaj said, “It can also not be lost sight of the fact that the pregnancy is an outcome of violation of the minor….The child, if born, is not a reminder of good memories, but shall be a reminder of trauma and agony she had to undergo”. The court observed that if the child gets born, as an unwanted child, it is likely that either he/she will live a tormenting life filled with taunts to his/her origin or be given away. “In either of the said situation, the mother as well as the child will suffer social stigma and incarceration for rest of their lives,” the court said.

[beardedmrbean]

The Delhi High Court recently justified child marriage by upholding the legality of a 15-year-old minor girl’s marriage, stating that she is of ‘Marriageable Age’ under Islamic Sharia Law.

The court held that a Muslim girl who is less than 18 years old but has attained puberty is free to marry anyone as per the Muslim Personal Law. The court observed that the minor Muslim girl can not only marry without the consent of her parents but can also reside with her husband even when she is less than 18 years of age.

Delhi HC’s single bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh made the observation while granting protection to a Muslim couple who married in March 2022 according to Islamic rites and rituals. The couple moved the court seeking directions to ensure that no one separates them.

The couple had filed a plea in court after the parents of the minor girl opposed the marriage and registered an FIR under IPC Section 363 against the husband. Subsequently, Section 376 and Section 6 POCSO were invoked in the case.

The girl reportedly told the court that she was beaten on a regular basis by her parents and had eloped and married of her own volition.

Meanwhile, as per the status report filed by the respondent, the girl was born on August 2, 2006, making her only 15 years old at the time of the marriage.

The status report further mentioned that the girl was brought back from the custody of her husband and handed over to her parents in the month of April. A medical examination was conducted on her at Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital (DDU), Delhi. The medical test revealed that the couple has had sexual intercourse and that the 15-year-old was then pregnant.

Granting protection to the couple, the Court observed: “It is thus clear that as per Mohammedan Law girl who had attained the age of puberty could marry without the consent of her parents and had the right to reside with her husband even when she was less than 18 years of age and thus otherwise minor girl.”

The court also ruled that the POCSO Act cannot be applied in the aforementioned case because it is not a case of sexual exploitation, but rather one in which the couple fell in love, married according to Muslim laws, and then had physical relationships.

Punjab and Haryana HC cites Sharia to justify child marriage

Interestingly, this is not the first case where a court has held the marriage of a minor Muslim girl legal. Recently, Punjab And Haryana High Court also justified child marriage by granting protection to a 16-year-old Muslim Girl who married a 21-year-old Muslim boy while noting that she is of Marriageable Age under Muslim Personal Law.

Last year too, the same verdict was passed by Justice Alka Sarin of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. While hearing the plea filed by a 36-year-old man and a 17-year-old girl, she gave the verdict relying on various court rulings and article 195 in ‘Principles of Mohammedan Law’, an authoritative textbook by Muslim personal law jurist Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla, that states: “Every Muslim with a mature mind who has attained puberty can contract marriage. Minors who have not attained puberty can be validly contracted in marriage by their parents.”

It is noteworthy that the Parliament had earlier introduced the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill 2021 to increase the marriageable age of girls to 21, equal to that of boys. Furthermore, while introducing the bill, the government said that it would be applicable to every girl irrespective of religion.

[rudrjobdesk]

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh News: हाईकोर्ट ने खारिज की राम रहीम के नकली होने वाली याचिका, लगाई फटकार

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh News: हाईकोर्ट ने खारिज की राम रहीम के नकली होने वाली याचिका, लगाई फटकार

Image Source : FILE PHOTO Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Gurmeet Ram Rahim News: जेल से बाहर आया डेरा सच्चा सौदा प्रमुख राम रहीम असली है या नकली, इसकी जांच को लेकर पंजाब और ​हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट में दायर याचिका खारिज कर दी गई है। जज ने कहा कि इस याचिका को दायर करने से पहले दिमाग का इस्तेमाल कर लिया होता। कोर्ट ने प्रश्न किया कि क्या ह्यूमन क्लोनिंग संभव है? हाईकोर्ट ने दिखाया कड़ा रूख याचिका पर सुनवाई के…

[rojgarkitalash]

Punjab Haryana High Court Clerk Recruitment 2022

Punjab Haryana High Court Clerk Recruitment 2022

As Per New Government Job Vacancy, The Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh has released the Official Notification for Clerk Posts. Candidates who have well-qualified to fill 759 Vacancies of Clerk Post through Punjab Haryana High Court Clerk Recruitment 2022 Notification from 06 August 2022 to 27 August 2022. Interested candidates who want to become this opportunity can apply through online…

[swamyworld]

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh latest news dera chief ram rahim demands 41 days parole to high court - India Hindi News - Gurmeet Ram Rahim is struggling to come out of jail, said in high court

read on app Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh: Dera Sachcha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim, who is serving a sentence in Rohtak’s Sunaria jail in rape and murder cases, wants to come out of jail once again. He has appealed to the Punjab and Haryana High Court to lift the order banning granting of parole or furlough. According to the Dera chief, he still has 41 days of parole left this year and he wants to…

[best24news]

SYL को लेकर हाईकोर्ट ने दिया ये निर्देश, Cm Haryana ने पंजाब को लिखा पत्र

SYL को लेकर हाईकोर्ट ने दिया ये निर्देश, Cm Haryana ने पंजाब को लिखा पत्र

हरियाणा: लंबे समय से विवादो में रहा एसवाईएल (SYL) का मामला एक बार चर्चा में है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार को इस मुद्दे पर पंजाब और हरियाणा के मुख्यमंत्रियों की बैठक आयोजित करने और मतभेदों को सुलझाने का प्रयास करने का निर्देश दिया है। अब देखना यह है पंजाब सरकार इस मसले को लेकर क्या रूख अपनाती है। हरियाण सीएम ने पजंब सीएम को भेजा पत्र: मुख्यमंत्री मनोहर लाल के प्रयासों से अब एसवाईएल (SYL) का…

[advocatenarenderyadav]

🚨🏢𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 !!🚨🏢

🏠Breaking Barriers: Supreme Court Shields Home Buyers From Bank Recovery - A Victory for Every Dream Home Seeker!🏠

💬 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗛𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀:

🔒 Financial Relief 🏠 Assurance of Possession ⚖️ Legal Precedent

𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗦𝗶𝘁𝗲:-https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/supreme-court-orders-protection-of-homebuyers-from-recovery-proceedings-initiated-by-banks . . 📢𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙮 𝙏𝙪𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝙇𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙡 𝙐𝙥𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨…⚖️ . . Enquire At: 🌐 www.advocatenarenderyadav.com 📧 narenyadavadv@gmail.com | info@advocatenarenderyadav.com 📍Room No - 16 Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, 160001