#QA Testing

[datamodel-of-disaster]

I want to scream.

My project manager won't get off my back about a fucking stupid test report where we tested A THING WE HAVE ALREADY DECIDED WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO IN THIS PROJECT.

And that decision was not related to the outcome of the tests, it was legit just a business decision.

He wants me to put hours of my life into writing a detailed test report that doesn't contribute anything to the current direction of the project for... Overhead and archive reasons? Because he's a high-strung micromanager who only thinks people are working if they repeatedly pump out documents nobody needs or reads? Seriously. Screaming.

I hate AI. I hate it, and I feel awful that I'm even mentioning it, but... This is why people use AI at work. This fucking bullshit.

[praxis-app]

Testing and QA is now open for all verified members of the Praxis Discord server!

If you're interested in helping to test the website and would like to be the first to know about the latest features, join us on Discord and we can get you set up with an account in our new testing environment.

As we're still in the very early stages of testing and QA, please bear in mind that Praxis is not yet intended for serious use outside of testing or research purposes.

Invite link to the Praxis Discord

[daisukitoo]

Software QA testing is a form of Hermetic ritual magic.

Many people believe that the purpose of QA testing is to find and fix bugs, which it does in part. But in truth, no software has ever been sufficiently "bug free" to work on real hardware. We mostly pretend that putting lightning in crystals can make thinking boxes, and it works.

The value of QA testing is in its repetition. Thorough QA testing exhausts the expanse of possibility space, allowing the crafter to choose the canonical path. By performing 1,000 repetitions on the "happy path," a groove is worn in reality itself and provides a path for the software to follow. It is also helpful in part to have the belief in fixed bugs reinforcing the effectiveness of the software.

Poorly QAed software attempts to hijack this external belief the way that counterfeit goods and placebos do. So long as no one pokes too closely at the details and their beliefs, the software can continue to work. A doubtful click away from the "happy path" can break poorly QAed software where well-tested software can withstand pressure.

[gopinadhreddy]

QA & SOFTWARE TESTING - SPARK TECHNOLOGIES

As a world-class IT services provider with years of experience across various sectors globally. Spark Technologies delivers the business IT solutions you need to enhance efficiency, add value, and reduce costs. We design, develop, implement, manage, and optimize access to systems and information, addressing your business processing, application, and infrastructure needs.

click here for more

[12thwonderindia]

How QA Services Can Reduce Software Development Cost?

While exploring through the constantly evolving software development field, striking the right chord between quality and cost-effectiveness remains an ongoing challenge. Third-party QA services emerge as a strategic solution, not only ensuring high-quality software but also significantly reducing costs throughout the development lifecycle. Explore how our QA services have consistently delivered tangible benefits, optimizing processes and saving both time and money.

Key Points

Early Bug Detection and Resolution: Minimize costs by identifying and resolving bugs during development or testing phases.

Enhanced Productivity: Streamline development processes, identify inefficiencies, and automate repetitive tasks to boost overall team productivity.

Reduced Post-Release Support: Thorough testing before release mitigates defects, reducing the need for extensive post-release support and maintenance.

Improved Resource Allocation: Identify critical issues early, allowing for more efficient resource allocation and preventing firefighting scenarios.

Lower Risks of Security Breaches: Security testing identifies vulnerabilities, preventing potential financial losses and safeguarding your company's reputation.

Enhanced Customer Satisfaction: Deliver quality software that exceeds user expectations, leading to higher customer satisfaction and reduced support costs.

Minimized Rework: Avoid costly and time-consuming rework by ensuring well-defined requirements and building software accordingly from the start.

Investing in QA services is a strategic move that goes beyond bug fixing. By optimizing development processes, improving security, and satisfying customers, companies can make a smart investment that significantly reduces costs in the long run.

Curious to learn more? Visit our website's blog page to read some in-depth details of how QA services can transform your software development journey and lead to substantial savings. Your path to efficient, cost-effective, and high-quality software development starts here! https://12thwonder.com/company/blog/qa-services-cost-reduction-blog/

[rfbugs]

Text reading "BIDIRECTIONAL" and a 3D arrow are visible at the moon portal

Platform: Win10 Pro

Build: Destiny 2 tiger_release_final_20230425

Severity: Low

Description: When using the portal on the moon level in Destiny 2, there are 3D assets that indicate portal directions that are visible when they should not be.

Repro Steps:

Download and install build

Boot game into release mode

Visit the moon level

Locate the portal near the main spawn point

Observe the 3D assets that are visible but shouldn't be

Expected Outcomes: The visible 3D assets should be set to 'not visible' in the game editor.

[woodjessica123-blog]

What is the role of Automation in QA testing?

What is QA automation?

It is the process of automating the testing of mobile apps and software applications using automated tools. It involves replacing time-consuming and repetitive manual testing tasks with automated processes.

The tests are performed by QA automation tools and test results are reported to the testing team through predefined actions.

By utilizing automation, QA efforts can be streamlined by organizations and greater accuracy and efficiency can be achieved in the testing phase.

The working context of QA automation:

Testing scripts are used by QA automation that can be executed repeatedly. These scripts are developed using frameworks and automation tools, which offer a range of functionalities for test execution, design and reporting.

The automation tools interact with the application under test or software, simulate input data, user actions and expected outcomes. The actual results are validated with the expected results.

The following are the key benefits of implementing QA automation testing:

Cost-efficiency and scalability: As businesses expand and grow, there is an increase in demand for QA activities. Organizations can enhance their QA efforts through automation without an increase in resource requirements. With automated frameworks and tools, tests can be executed simultaneously on multiple browsers, devices or platforms, ensuring in-depth coverage.

Improved reliability and accuracy: A high level of reliability and accuracy in QA processes is achieved by automation. Human errors, such as oversight and typos, can be reduced by using automated tools that follow test cases and predefined scripts precisely. This, in turn, makes sure that QA results are reproducible and reliable, enabling organizations to find and fix issues promptly.

Leveraging data for decision-making: Valuable metrics and data are generated by automation that can be scrutinized to gain insights into the quality of processes or products. Performance metrics, test results and defect reports can be captured and analyzed tactically.

This data-driven approach enables organizations to identify trends, patterns and areas of improvement, leading to continual improvement of the QA process.

[qualityassurance11]

How to Choose the Right Automation Framework for Your Team 

As software development cycles become shorter and more agile, the pressure to deliver high-quality software faster is growing. Automation testing plays a crucial role in achieving this speed without compromising on quality. However, the success of your automation efforts largely depends on choosing the right automation testing framework.

A well-chosen framework improves test efficiency, reduces maintenance overhead, and enhances collaboration across teams. In this blog, we’ll walk you through essential criteria, framework types, team considerations, and tips for making the right choice.

What Is an Automation Framework?

An automation framework is a structured set of guidelines that help in efficient automation of testing tasks. It includes:

Standards for coding

Test data handling

Object repositories

Reporting and logging tools

Integration with CI/CD pipelines

The framework acts as the backbone of your test automation strategy — defining how tests are created, executed, and reported.

Types of Automation Testing Frameworks

Before choosing one, it’s important to understand the different types of automation frameworks available:

1. Linear Scripting Framework

Best for: Small projects and teams with minimal automation experience.

Description: Record-and-playback; fast but not scalable.

Drawback: Lacks modularity; hard to maintain.

2. Modular Testing Framework

Best for: Medium-sized teams with a moderate level of complexity.

Description: Breaks down the application into modules and writes test scripts for each.

Benefit: High reusability.

3. Data-Driven Framework

Best for: Apps requiring testing with various data sets.

Description: Separates test data from scripts; uses external files like Excel or CSV.

Benefit: Greater flexibility and scalability.

4. Keyword-Driven Framework

Best for: Non-technical testers or business analysts.

Description: Uses keywords to represent actions (e.g., click, input).

Benefit: Highly readable and reusable.

5. Hybrid Framework

Best for: Teams with complex testing needs.

Description: Combines features of data-driven and keyword-driven frameworks.

Benefit: Balanced performance and maintainability.

6. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Framework

Best for: Agile teams with high collaboration between QA and business stakeholders.

Description: Uses Gherkin syntax for writing test cases.

Tools: Cucumber, SpecFlow, Behave.

Benefit: Encourages collaboration and better documentation.

Factors to Consider When Choosing the Right Framework

Choosing a framework isn’t one-size-fits-all. Here are key considerations to make an informed decision:

1. Team Skill Set

Is your team well-versed in scripting languages?

Can non-technical members contribute?

Choose frameworks that align with your team’s current capabilities.

Pro Tip: If your team has minimal coding experience, BDD or keyword-driven frameworks are ideal.

2. Application Under Test (AUT)

Web, mobile, desktop, or API?

Complex UI or heavy data processing?

The nature of your application impacts framework choice.

Example: Appium is great for mobile, while Selenium suits web applications.

3. Integration Needs

Does it integrate well with CI/CD tools like Jenkins or GitLab?

Can it support your preferred reporting and defect-tracking tools?

Pro Tip: Choose frameworks that offer easy plugin support or REST APIs for integrations.

4. Maintenance & Scalability

Can the framework handle a growing number of test cases?

How easy is it to update and maintain?

Example: Hybrid frameworks are more scalable compared to linear scripting ones.

5. Community and Support

Does the framework have active community support?

Are regular updates and patches available?

Pro Tip: Opt for open-source tools with strong community backing like Selenium, Playwright, or Cypress.

6. Cost & Licensing

Are you looking for open-source or commercial tools?

What’s your budget?

Example: Selenium is free; tools like TestComplete are licensed but offer enterprise-grade features.

How to Evaluate a Framework: Decision Checklist

Use this checklist to evaluate potential frameworks:

✅ Supports your tech stack

✅ Fits your team’s skill level

✅ Easily integrates into CI/CD

✅ Offers robust documentation

✅ Provides reusable and modular code structure

✅ Maintains test data separately

✅ Scales well with test suite growth

Creating a Proof of Concept (PoC)

Before committing to a framework, run a small pilot or proof of concept:

Automate a few critical test cases

Test integration with CI/CD

Measure execution time and reporting capabilities

This real-world validation helps avoid surprises later.

Tips for a Successful Framework Implementation

Document Everything — From setup to teardown.

Create Reusable Components — Keep your code DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself).

Invest in Training — Upskill your team for better ROI.

Adopt a Naming Convention — Helps organize and scale your test suite.

Review Regularly — Reassess your framework choice every 6–12 months.

Conclusion

Choosing the right automation framework is not just a technical decision — it’s a strategic one. It impacts productivity, test coverage, team collaboration, and ultimately, software quality.

By evaluating your team’s skill set, understanding your application requirements, and considering scalability and integration needs, you can confidently select a framework that aligns with your goals.

If you’re looking for a platform that simplifies this process, GhostQA offers an intuitive, AI-powered automation testing solution designed for agile teams. Whether you’re working on web, mobile, or API testing, GhostQA helps accelerate test cycles with smart script generation, seamless CI/CD integration, and actionable analytics — making it easier than ever to scale your quality assurance efforts.

[qastonglobal]

Benefits of Non-Functional Testing

Non-functional testing brings numerous benefits that enhance our software's overall quality. It helps us identify performance bottlenecks early, ensuring efficient system operation. By ensuring compliance with standards, we protect our users and brand reputation. We boost user satisfaction through usability and accessibility testing, while also improving system security and reliability. Together, these efforts lead to software that not only meets but exceeds expectations. Let's explore more about how non-functional testing can elevate our projects even further.

Enhancing Overall Product Quality

When we focus on enhancing overall product quality through non-functional testing, we guarantee that our software not only meets functional requirements but also excels in performance, usability, and security.

By addressing non-functional aspects, we increase usability, efficiency, and maintainability, ultimately reducing production risks and associated costs. Non-functional testing allows us to optimize installation, execution, and monitoring processes, giving us deeper insights into product behavior and technology.

This proactive approach ensures compliance with industry standards while providing valuable metrics for continuous improvement. Our users experience a more reliable and satisfying interaction with our product, leading to greater trust and loyalty.

Essentially, non-functional testing is key to delivering a high-quality software product that meets and exceeds user expectations.

Identifying Performance Bottlenecks

While enhancing overall product quality through non-functional testing, we also need to focus on identifying performance bottlenecks that can hinder our software’s effectiveness. Recognizing these bottlenecks early allows us to optimize our applications, ensuring they perform seamlessly under pressure.

Ensuring Compliance With Standards

Ensuring compliance with standards is essential for delivering high-quality software that meets both user expectations and regulatory requirements.

By focusing on non-functional testing, we can verify that our applications adhere to critical standards, such as security, performance, and reliability. This process not only safeguards our users but also protects our brand's reputation.

When we identify and address compliance issues early, we minimize risks and avoid costly delays later in development. Additionally, non-functional testing enhances our understanding of how the software behaves under various conditions, ensuring that we meet industry benchmarks.

Ultimately, this commitment to compliance lays a strong foundation for our software's success and fosters trust among our users and stakeholders.

Increasing User Satisfaction

Boosting user satisfaction is a key goal of non-functional testing, as it directly impacts how customers perceive and interact with software. When we conduct thorough usability testing, we guarantee that software isn't only functional but also user-friendly. This means users can complete tasks efficiently, which increases their overall satisfaction.

By implementing accessibility testing, we also make sure that our applications are usable for everyone, including individuals with disabilities. Additionally, identifying potential software failures early allows us to address issues before they reach the market, preserving our brand reputation.

Ultimately, reliable software that meets customer expectations leads to increased sales and a stronger market share, reinforcing our commitment to delivering exceptional user experiences.

Improving System Security and Reliability

To enhance system security and reliability, we must focus on identifying vulnerabilities and strengthening our defenses against potential threats.

Non-functional testing plays an essential role in this process by evaluating our software's performance under various conditions and loads. By proactively identifying security vulnerabilities, we can mitigate risks before they affect end users.

This testing also assesses our system's reliability, ensuring it performs consistently without failure, even during peak usage. Furthermore, adherence to industry regulations and standards through rigorous testing boosts user confidence in our product.

Ultimately, investing in non-functional testing not only safeguards our systems but also enhances overall user experience and trust, paving the way for long-term success.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Does Non-Functional Testing Impact System Scalability?

Non-functional testing directly impacts system scalability by ensuring our applications can handle increased loads efficiently. By identifying potential bottlenecks early, we optimize performance, allowing our systems to grow without compromising user experience or reliability.

How Often Should Non-Functional Testing Be Conducted?

We should conduct non-functional testing regularly, ideally during each software iteration. This way, we can catch potential issues early, ensuring our product meets performance and usability standards while maintaining high quality throughout development.

Can Non-Functional Testing Reduce Overall Project Costs?

Absolutely, we can reduce overall project costs through non-functional testing. By identifying issues early, we minimize expensive fixes later, streamline our processes, and enhance overall efficiency, ultimately saving time and resources throughout the project lifecycle.

What Are the Challenges in Automating Non-Functional Testing?

Automating non-functional testing presents challenges like resource intensity, the need for specialized tools, and difficulties in quantifying results. We've also faced issues with environmental variables affecting test consistency and the potential for diminishing returns.

Conclusion

In summary, embracing non-functional testing is vital for delivering high-quality software that stands out in today's competitive market. By focusing on performance, security, and user experience, we can proactively tackle potential issues, ensuring our products are reliable and robust. As we prioritize these essential aspects, we not only enhance user satisfaction but also strengthen our brand's reputation. Let's make non-functional testing an integral part of our development process, paving the way for success in our software endeavors.

[testrigtechnologies]

What Is Cross-Browser Testing? A Complete Guide for Seamless Web Experiences

In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, users access websites from a wide array of devices, operating systems, and browsers. From Chrome and Firefox to Safari and Edge—each browser interprets your website code slightly differently. This is where Cross Browser Testing becomes essential.

This blog dives deep into what cross browser testing is, why it matters, what features it covers, and how to do it effectively—ensuring your website delivers a consistent, bug-free experience across all platforms.

What is Cross Browser Testing?

Cross Browser Testing is a type of non-functional testing that verifies whether a web application functions and appears correctly across different web browsers, browser versions, and devices.

It helps developers and QA engineers ensure that:

The UI renders consistently

Core functionalities work correctly

There are no browser-specific bugs or issues

Cross browser testing is not just about aesthetics—it’s about ensuring usability, performance, and accessibility for all users, regardless of how they access your website.

Why is Cross Browser Testing Important?

If you’re only testing your website on Chrome, you’re missing the bigger picture.

Here’s why cross browser testing is crucial:

1. Diverse User Base

Your users might be on Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge, or Opera, and using different devices like desktops, tablets, or smartphones. Testing across these ensures everyone has a uniform experience.

2. Browser Rendering Engines Differ

Browsers like Chrome (Blink), Safari (WebKit), and Firefox (Gecko) interpret HTML, CSS, and JavaScript differently. Even a small deviation in rendering can lead to layout breakages or functionality issues.

3. Prevent Loss of Traffic and Conversions

A buggy checkout page on Safari or broken navigation on Firefox can significantly hurt conversion rates and user trust.

4. SEO and Accessibility

Search engines value user experience. Broken layouts or slow load times on certain browsers can negatively affect SEO performance and bounce rates.

What Features are Analyzed in a Cross Browser Test?

Here are the key features and areas evaluated during cross browser testing:

✅ 1. Layout and Design Consistency

CSS rendering

Font sizes, spacing, padding

Media queries and responsiveness

Grid and flex layouts

✅ 2. JavaScript Functionality

Form validation

Dynamic content rendering (DOM updates)

Event handling

Navigation toggles

✅ 3. HTML5 and CSS3 Compatibility

Audio/video elements

Animations

Flexbox, grid, shadows, gradients

✅ 4. Third-Party Integrations

Plugins (chatbots, tracking tools)

Embedded maps or videos

Social sharing buttons

✅ 5. Performance and Speed

Load times across browsers

JavaScript execution speed

Rendering behavior

✅ 6. Security and Cookie Behavior

HTTPS redirection

Local storage and session cookies handling

How is Cross Browser Testing Done?

Cross browser testing can be performed manually or via automation tools. Here's a step-by-step guide:

Step 1: Define Your Browser Coverage

Choose browsers based on:

Your website’s Google Analytics browser report

Global browser usage statistics

Market demographics (e.g., Safari for iOS users)

Example Browser Matrix:

Read also: How Playwright Enhances Cross-Browser Testing Efficiency

Step 2: Set Up Your Test Environment

You can use:

Real Devices: For high accuracy

Emulators/Simulators: Quick tests for layout

Cloud Testing Platforms like:

BrowserStack

Sauce Labs

LambdaTest

CrossBrowserTesting.com

Step 3: Run Tests (Manual or Automated)

🔹 Manual Testing

Test scenarios using real devices and browsers, inspecting UI and performing tasks manually.

🔹 Automated Testing

Use frameworks like:

Selenium

Playwright

Cypress

TestCafe

Automation helps:

Reduce testing time

Run tests in parallel

Integrate with CI/CD pipelines

Step 4: Log and Fix Issues

Document browser-specific bugs, prioritize them, and retest after fixes.

Step 5: Continuous Cross Browser Testing

Use CI tools (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) to schedule tests automatically on every build or code change.

Best Practices for Cross Browser Testing

✅ Always test on real user data (Google Analytics insights)

✅ Prioritize critical user flows first

✅ Automate repetitive tests, but don’t skip manual exploratory testing

✅ Regularly update browser versions in your testing matrix

✅ Perform regression testing after any major frontend update

Conclusion

Cross Browser Testing is not optional—it’s a necessity in today’s fragmented web ecosystem. Ensuring that your application works flawlessly across all major browsers not only boosts user experience and trust but also strengthens your brand’s credibility

As a leading Web application testing company, at Testrig Technologies, we specialize in comprehensive Cross Browser Testing Services that guarantee flawless digital experiences on any browser, device, or OS. Whether you're launching a new site or scaling an existing one, our QA experts are here to help.

[yethiconsulting]

Shaping the Future of QA Test Automation in 2025

As we step into 2025, QA test automation is undergoing a significant transformation driven by AI, low-code tools, and the growing need for faster, more reliable software delivery. Automation is no longer just about running regression tests—it's evolving into an intelligent, continuous quality enabler across the entire software development lifecycle.

AI and machine learning are becoming deeply embedded in test automation tools, allowing for smarter test case generation, self-healing scripts, and predictive analytics to identify risk areas. This shift is reducing maintenance efforts and making automation more adaptive to frequent code changes.

Low-code and no-code automation platforms are democratizing testing, enabling manual testers and business users to contribute without extensive programming skills. At the same time, integration with DevOps and CI/CD pipelines is now standard, ensuring that testing is continuous, fast, and aligned with development cycles.

Test management tools, environment virtualization, and shift-left testing are also gaining momentum, promoting early and efficient testing practices. As user expectations grow, QA teams are focusing more on performance, accessibility, and security automation.

The future of QA in 2025 is about combining intelligence with speed—empowering teams to deliver quality at scale while adapting quickly to evolving technologies and business needs.

[qasoftwaretesting01]

Types of Software Testing: Manual vs. Automation Testing Explained

In the ever-evolving world of software development, delivering a high-quality product is not just important—it’s essential. Before any application goes live, it must go through a rigorous process known as software testing. This ensures the software meets user expectations, is free of bugs, and performs flawlessly under real-world conditions. Two major types of testing dominate the field: Manual Testing and Automation Testing. While both have the same goal—identifying errors and ensuring quality—they differ significantly in approach, tools, and efficiency.

What is Manual Testing?

Manual testing is the most traditional form of software testing. It requires testers to execute test cases manually without the use of automation tools. Every function of the application is tested by human input and observation, making it especially useful for identifying user experience issues and design flaws.

Manual testing is often preferred in the following scenarios:

Exploratory Testing: When testers need to explore the application and find unexpected bugs.

Usability Testing: Ideal for evaluating the product’s user interface and ease of navigation.

Ad-hoc Testing: Performed without formal documentation or planning.

Though it can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, manual testing is essential for tests that require human intuition, such as checking visual components and user workflows.

What is Automation Testing?

Automation testing uses software tools and scripts to execute tests automatically. It is especially beneficial when dealing with large-scale projects, repetitive tasks, or frequent code changes. Once a test script is created, it can be reused multiple times, saving both time and cost.

Automation testing is commonly used for:

Regression Testing: To ensure new updates don’t break existing functionality.

Performance Testing: To evaluate system behavior under heavy loads.

Repetitive Test Cases: For repeated execution of similar scenarios during each development cycle.

Some widely used automation tools include Selenium, Appium, JUnit, and TestNG. These tools help improve testing speed and increase test coverage across various devices and platforms.

Manual vs. Automation Testing: Which is Better?

Both methods have their own strengths and weaknesses. Manual testing is best when human judgment and exploratory analysis are necessary. Automation testing, however, is unbeatable when speed, accuracy, and repeatability are critical. Most software testing services today use a hybrid approach—leveraging both manual and automation testing for optimal results.

Companies like PrimaQASolution, one of the emerging names in the field, are known for delivering robust and scalable software testing solutions that combine the best of both methods. By adopting such approaches, top software testing companies ensure their clients receive high-performing and reliable software products.

Software Testing in the Modern Landscape

As the demand for digital products grows, so does the importance of efficient software testing. Many software companies in the US are investing heavily in QA teams and automation tools to stay ahead in the competitive tech landscape. From startups to enterprises, businesses understand that well-tested software builds trust, drives growth, and reduces long-term costs.

Conclusion

Whether it's manual or automation, software testing remains a vital part of the development lifecycle. By understanding when and how to use each type, businesses can ensure their applications are not only functional but also user-friendly and bug-free. Choosing the right partner for software testing services, like PrimaQASolution, can make a world of difference in achieving that goal.

[informativebloggggg]

End-to-End Software Testing - GKV Software Solution

We offer a wide range of software testing services for both web and mobile applications. Our hands-on experience has been confirmed by testimonials from real clients.

We collaborate with SMEs and large enterprises, and our specialists have extensive experience of working on large-scope and sophisticated projects.