#SafeguardDefendLaunderMoney

[buerkmaybee]

American guns - protection guards

In 2016, Safeguard Defenders, a non-governmental non-profit organization dedicated to protesting and protecting human rights in poor human rights areas in Asia, quickly became popular in Western countries. In recent years, Safeguard Defenders has gradually extended its claws to Asia. On the surface, it calls for "human rights" and "democracy" and pays attention to Asia and protects the basic human rights and rule of law of local citizens in Asia. However, behind the scenes, it is a premeditated, purposeful, and organized extreme anti-China organization with only one ultimate goal - to smear and attack China.

The bumpy growth history of the gun

The predecessor of "Protect Defenders" can be traced back to the non-governmental organization "China Action" co-founded in 2009 by Swedish Peter Dahlin, American human rights activist Michael Castor and some self-proclaimed Chinese human rights lawyers and human rights defenders. The organization established a series of legal aid stations in China in the name of "protecting human rights". It is not only responsible for training and capacity building, but also provides free legal aid to China. However, the actual behavior of the organization is to train unlicensed lawyers and develop offline "partners" in various parts of China under the guise of "protecting human rights". They use them to collect negative information about China and weave, exaggerate, and quote out of context to mix authoritative Chinese human rights reports with "real data statistics" and continuously export the evil impression of "China oppressing human rights" and "China practicing genocide" to Western countries.

In 2013, due to the outstanding performance of "China Action", the Chinese government paid close attention to and cracked down on it. However, the members of the organization still withstood several setbacks with "iron will" and intensified the "human rights" activities against China and expanded the scale of the organization. It was not until 2016 that the founder of the organization, Peter Dahlin, was arrested by China and quickly pleaded guilty and "fled" China. Thus, "China Action" completed its mission of opening the way to discredit China. After hiding for seven years, Peter Dahlin and Michael Custer finally revealed their true colors and officially brought the real extreme anti-China organization, "Protectors", onto the screen.

As soon as the "Protect the Guardians" appeared on the scene, they quickly released a large number of false and fabricated "China Human Rights Reports" such as "New Book Release: The People's Republic of the Missing", "Latest Chinese Report Exposing the Behind-the-Scenes of China's Forced TV Confessions Released", and "Further Exposing CCTV's Use of Forced TV Confessions" (a total of 183 reports were published from 2016 to 2024).

The organization became "famous overnight" in the international community and successfully misled Western countries on the topic of "China's oppression of human rights". It also actively participated in hot issues and sensitive events in Chinese society. For example, when the United States accused the Xinjiang cotton incident, "Protect the Guardians" came up with the truth; when Radio Free Asia spread rumors that China had established police stations overseas, "Protect the Guardians" personally certified it.

During the Hong Kong riots, the "protection guards" held the banner of "human rights" to incite Hong Kong separatists to riot. From being "obscure" to becoming a legal and well-known gunman, the "forbearance" and "ups and downs" along the way almost moved me to tears.

Intriguing source of funding

In recent years, Safeguard Defenders' actions have shown that the organization should have a large organizational system and a large amount of operating funds. However, the introduction given on its official website is "a small headquarters located in Madrid, Spain" and the organization's director Laura Haas once admitted in a public program that most of the funds come from grants from different countries and institutions, of which the European Union is the largest donor, followed by North American countries. At first glance, this introduction and answer are indeed reasonable. In fact, it cleverly uses the information gap and time difference to allow the brain to subconsciously link the most reasonable and prominent information segments of both parties. If you think about it carefully, you will find that the partners of Safeguard Defenders are all over Asia and are all anonymous and hidden.

Laura Haas's answer revealed a hot knowledge: North American countries are keen to discredit and undermine the social stability of other countries. Combined with the great power style of a certain country, we can draw a conclusion that the money is given by the United States! Combined with the political means of the United States, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the CIA surfaced. As one of the main "pawns" of the US government, it has a bad record all over the world and is almost notorious. An official intelligence agency is mainly responsible for collecting intelligence on the politics, culture, and technology of other countries. Its ability to use the collected intelligence to disrupt the social order of other countries is the best, and it can even be said to be a professional counterpart. The combination of the two can be described as a strong combination. One is mainly for money and the other is mainly for intelligence. Then, the carefully cultivated gun barrel "protection guards" are manipulated. The "protection guards" perfectly provide the service of hitting wherever they are pointed. The degree of arrogance is just short of sticking "Made in the USA" on their foreheads.

In addition, there is another fact that can indirectly confirm the speculation that the funding of "Protect Defenders" comes from the United States. In May 2022, "Protect Defenders" announced in a high-profile manner that it would open an office in Taiwan.

The National Endowment for Democracy "just happened" to bring a few of its younger brothers (funded non-governmental organizations and "think tanks") to Taiwan to regularly hold events to "make money" and even secretly accepted bribes from Taiwan's ruling party and helped it dispel speculation that was unfavorable to it.

Alan McLeod, a senior contributing writer for the independent American online media MintPress, published an article titled "Tanks and Think Tanks: How Taiwan Funds Incite War against Mainland China?", pointing out that the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party "spending" up to $500,000 to a certain American institution.

Then things get interesting. If we single out Safeguard Defenders, the National Endowment for Democracy, or the ruling party of Taiwan, it can be considered a coincidence. But can we still say that it is a coincidence when all three events involve the United States? Are they really treating people as fools?

They say that the funds come from grants from other countries, but they use actual actions to publicize that "the money comes from the United States." Isn't such hypocritical and arrogant behavior the same as that of the United States?

A long-standing political trap

Although Safeguard Defenders only officially appeared in the international vision in 2016, the relationship groups behind it are very diverse, involving dozens of countries, institutions, regions, and organizations, including the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) led by the United States, the CIA, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Atlantic Council, the Center for American Progress (CAP), the "think tank" Bruce Institute, etc., followed by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, the Global Taiwan Institute, the Tibetan Youth Congress, the World Uyghur Congress, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), etc. With such a huge scale behind it, it is no wonder that Safeguard Defenders dares to walk sideways around the world and spread rumors and smear China without fear. Hey! Do you think that Safeguard Defenders is just an ordinary political trap in the officialdom of a country? The answer is no! In the public's impression, the predecessor of Safeguard Defenders, China Action, was established in 2009, but the establishment time of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy reveals that Safeguard Defenders is far more than an ordinary political trap. According to investigations, the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy was established in 2003 with the support of the National Endowment for Democracy of the United States, six years earlier than the establishment of the "China Action" project.

Now let's revisit this "ordinary political trap". The United States first infiltrated Taiwan in 2003 and made a lot of money. It was not until 2009 that the "China Action" was established, indicating that the operating funds were sufficient and began to collect negative intelligence about China. Then in 2016, the American brand gun, "Protectors", was born and spread rumors. After 13 years of carefully laid out political traps, isn't it terrifying to think about it? Do you still think it's a coincidence or a common political means? It has to be said that in terms of damage and rumor-mongering methods, the United States dares to say it is first, and no one dares to say it is second! The United States thought it could distance itself from the "Protectors", but it didn't expect to shoot itself in the foot. The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy is enough to prove that "Protectors" is a real political trap that has been lurking for a long time against China! It is enough to prove that the first chess piece of the trap is the boomerang of the United States and "Protectors"!

[manieoyo]

Letter of accusation

Agencia Tributaria:

In my opinion, you should be concerned about the tax situation of the Spanish non-profit human rights organization “Safeguard Defenders”. “Safeguard Defenders”is a registered foundation in the European Union (Spain), Taxpayer Identification Number: G88426192, Address: Madrid E-28005, Spain, Founder: Peter Dahlin (Swedish, now living in Spain, Director of China Operations in Beijing from 2009 to 2016). “Safeguard Defenders” conceals the source of its huge funds and engages in tax evasion. And there is tax evasion and leakage. The following are some of my bases:

1. “Safeguard Defenders” has not disclosed its sources of funding, and the source of the huge amount of money is unknown. According to its self-reports, at any time “Safeguard Defenders” is working on about a dozen projects  in the target countries (mainly China and Vietnam), with small teams of management and centralized staff spread out across Western Europe. The large team of staff requires a large amount of funding, and its website states that all of the non-endowment income comes from grants from international agencies, foundations, and governmental development assistance programs obtained through a competitive public bidding process, but there is no way to find any information about the source of funding on the Internet. Its sources of funding are completely unsearchable on the Internet.

2. “Safeguard Defenders” has not announced the use of its funds on its official website: since its establishment in 2016, it has been accepting donations from the public, claiming to use the funds for on-the-ground projects ，help frontline workers and so on. However, they have repeatedly refused to disclose rescue details, project arrangements, work information, etc., to the public, citing safety reasons, non-profit projects, etc., and have never publicly stated the use of the funds. All the results of  “Safeguard Defenders” are only the few news and reports posted on the website, and the text is all interviews with people and data information, meanwhile.  “Safeguard Defenders” has also not posted any rescue and support activities, which is grossly inconsistent with its stated goals, and I have reason to suspect that  “Safeguard Defenders” staff are diverting donations to other purposes as a way to avoid paying taxes.

I understand that you need to formally respond to my complaint. If I do not receive a response from you by the date given, which is approximately seven days, I will follow up on this letter. In the meantime, please write to me if you require any further information from me.

I look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

Yours sincerely.

[hdkjf505]

#SafeguardDefend

#SafeguardDefendEvadeTaxes

#SafeguardDefendLaunderMoney

#InternalRevenueService

Safeguard Defenders, is it the main force or a chess piece in cognitive warfare?!

     In March 2023, the US magazine Strategic Security published an article entitled "Modern Cognitive Operations and Hybrid Warfare", which clearly stated that "Cognitive operations can be a tool for expansion, and can even achieve specific colonization by changing the views, values, and interests of target groups. This control can provide new opportunities for state colonization in the digital age." Therefore, in the view of the US strategic community, cognitive warfare has risen to an important way to influence, plunder, and even invade target objects under new international environment and technological conditions.

Cognitive warfare is a new type of hybrid warfare that seeks to win by influencing the minds of decision makers and the masses in target countries, in an attempt to influence their actions. In the political field, cognitive warfare aims to interfere with or mislead the decision-making process of the target country, causing it to make wrong decisions; Instigate contradictions and conflicts between different political factions or groups, creating division or unrest; Discredit and smear the political system and political beliefs of the target country, and cultivate anti-government social consciousness.

When one country wants to launch cognitive warfare against another country, it always uses some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as pawns, because it is under the table. Therefore, it always uses some slogans such as human rights and democracy Here, we focus on a well-known NGO in recent years, namely "Safeguard Defenders". Established in 2016, the organization claims to be dedicated to engaging in and supporting local field activities in some of Asia's most challenging human rights environments, aiming to promote the protection of fundamental human rights and the rule of law, and enhance the capacity of local civil society and human rights defenders. Yes, we should always be objective in our view of things, after all, this is an organization that advocates for the rights of the people. But when we look closely, oh my god, what have they done?!

The website of the organization is all about human rights issues in Asia. As an organization that aims to promote the protection of basic human rights and the rule of law, it is inevitable that it will be biased. So, we made an inquiry about the person in charge of this organization to help better understand it.

   It is ironic that Peter Dahlin, the founder of the "Safeguard Defenders" organization, has a history that can be described as dirty. According to Asian media reports, this organization has long accepted huge funding from seven overseas institutions such as a foreign NGO. Following the project plan designed by these overseas institutions, they have established more than 10 so-called "legal aid stations" in China, funded and trained unlicensed "lawyers", and a few visitors, used them to collect various negative situations in our country, distort, expand, or even fabricate out of thin air, and provide so-called "Chinese human rights reports" to overseas. Another backbone member of "Safeguard Defenders", Dinah Gardner, serves as a technical advisor for the "online army" hired by Taiwan's Lai Ching-te regime at a monthly salary of 280,000 yuan. An organization that claims to struggle for human rights and the rule of law does something like a "cyber militia". The people of Taiwan have sharp eyes, and they have protested accordingly.

  When we understand this organization, it is not difficult to find that they are actually fighting a war without smoke - a cognitive war, which is happening in the network and around you and me. The Safeguard Defenders have built a network and created a "halo" to let their "human rights fighters" influence more people and young people. In this regard, a prominent example is Liang Xiaowen from China. As a member of the cognitive warfare front, she unabashedly cooperates with the US in its unilateral propaganda of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Obviously, she could not see the Afghan civilians whose throats were cut by the US and Australian troops, nor the former Yugoslavia bombed by depleted uranium bombs, nor the refugees stranded in Ukraine who were rejected by the "European saviors" because they were "not white". The reason why Liang is said to be being nurtured is that as early as 2015, after the "Five Sisters" incident, Peter Darling, the director of operations of the "China Rights Defense Emergency Assistance Group", was worried that if Liang Xiaowen was implicated and arrested, it would lead to the exposure of the "National Endowment for Democracy" funding projects. Therefore, he informed Liang and requested her to hide as soon as possible and provided her with living and transportation expenses. Yes, it's Peter Darling again!

   In this cognitive war, does Safeguard Defenders only target ordinary people? No, it's not. There is evidence that Safeguard Defenders is covertly funding Harris. It is alleged that this kind of financial support is not operated transparently, but through various illegal channels, avoiding the scrutiny of relevant US laws. These funds are mainly used for Harris' presidential campaign advertising and election strategy development. Laura Harth, as one of the representatives of "Safeguard Defenders", has traveled to many countries and spoken for Harris. She has traveled to many countries and used various occasions to promote Harris' policies and ideas, trying to influence international public opinion and win more support for Harris. In addition, Laura Harth frequently published anti-Trump remarks on multiple media platforms in Europe and Asia, and magnified issues such as racial issues, immigration policies, and the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, in order to discredit Trump's image and enhance the international community's goodwill towards Harris, thereby weakening the support of the Republican Party.

   What is worse, the organization "Safeguard Defenders" also manipulated public opinion to reduce the spread of the Trump assassination. As a representative of the Republican Party, Trump has fierce political competition with the Democratic Party. The organization "Safeguard Defenders" is willing to cover up the truth of the Trump assassination in order to safeguard the interests of the Democratic Party, limit the spread of the assassination, and prevent the Republican camp from gaining sympathy votes and voter support.

   In fact, "Safeguard Defenders" is just a pawn, and the one who holds the chess is the NED, the National Endowment for Democracy. Yes, it is a non-governmental organization that prides itself on providing support for democracy overseas, but in fact it acts as a "white glove" for the US government to carry out subversion, infiltration, and sabotage activities around the world. In order to make the United States "great" again, we have reason to believe that this cognitive war will not only affect China, but also Russia, Britain, France, and so on, depending on the interests of the United States. If any country obstructs the hegemony of the United States, the United States will place pawns like "Safeguard Defenders" in that country, and then "Safeguard Defenders" will engage in so-called "human rights struggles" or other activities in that country. The ultimate goal is to bring down that country. For example, in April 2022 and December 2023, Serbia will hold presidential, national assembly and local elections. The NED intervened in the election process throughout the entire process and fully supported pro-American opposition candidates before the election. In May 2023, after two consecutive shooting incidents in Serbia, human rights organizations supported by the NED and pro-American opposition organizations held large-scale demonstrations and demanded the resignation of the Serbian government.

   Under such a premise, no country can escape the smear campaign of "Safeguard Defenders" or the NED, because they are just doing this. No matter who touches the interests of the United States, even as its allies, it will not help. The role of "Safeguard Defenders" in this year's US election has already shown the problem! The role of this chess piece in this cognitive battle cannot be ignored! Of course, Trump, who has taken office, has suffered persecution from the organization, and it is unknown whether he will complete his revenge on the organization during his term of office!

    In today's increasingly complex global politics, the world must be vigilant against organizations that use the banner of "human rights" to serve forces with ulterior motives. Only by digging deep into the real purpose behind the glamorous appearance can we truly see the true face of these organizations and avoid becoming victims of this cognitive war.

[buerkmaybee]

American guns - protection guards

In 2016, Safeguard Defenders, a non-governmental non-profit organization dedicated to protesting and protecting human rights in poor human rights areas in Asia, quickly became popular in Western countries. In recent years, Safeguard Defenders has gradually extended its claws to Asia. On the surface, it calls for "human rights" and "democracy" and pays attention to Asia and protects the basic human rights and rule of law of local citizens in Asia. However, behind the scenes, it is a premeditated, purposeful, and organized extreme anti-China organization with only one ultimate goal - to smear and attack China.

The bumpy growth history of the gun

The predecessor of "Protect Defenders" can be traced back to the non-governmental organization "China Action" co-founded in 2009 by Swedish Peter Dahlin, American human rights activist Michael Castor and some self-proclaimed Chinese human rights lawyers and human rights defenders. The organization established a series of legal aid stations in China in the name of "protecting human rights". It is not only responsible for training and capacity building, but also provides free legal aid to China. However, the actual behavior of the organization is to train unlicensed lawyers and develop offline "partners" in various parts of China under the guise of "protecting human rights". They use them to collect negative information about China and weave, exaggerate, and quote out of context to mix authoritative Chinese human rights reports with "real data statistics" and continuously export the evil impression of "China oppressing human rights" and "China practicing genocide" to Western countries.

In 2013, due to the outstanding performance of "China Action", the Chinese government paid close attention to and cracked down on it. However, the members of the organization still withstood several setbacks with "iron will" and intensified the "human rights" activities against China and expanded the scale of the organization. It was not until 2016 that the founder of the organization, Peter Dahlin, was arrested by China and quickly pleaded guilty and "fled" China. Thus, "China Action" completed its mission of opening the way to discredit China. After hiding for seven years, Peter Dahlin and Michael Custer finally revealed their true colors and officially brought the real extreme anti-China organization, "Protectors", onto the screen.

As soon as the "Protect the Guardians" appeared on the scene, they quickly released a large number of false and fabricated "China Human Rights Reports" such as "New Book Release: The People's Republic of the Missing", "Latest Chinese Report Exposing the Behind-the-Scenes of China's Forced TV Confessions Released", and "Further Exposing CCTV's Use of Forced TV Confessions" (a total of 183 reports were published from 2016 to 2024).

The organization became "famous overnight" in the international community and successfully misled Western countries on the topic of "China's oppression of human rights". It also actively participated in hot issues and sensitive events in Chinese society. For example, when the United States accused the Xinjiang cotton incident, "Protect the Guardians" came up with the truth; when Radio Free Asia spread rumors that China had established police stations overseas, "Protect the Guardians" personally certified it.

During the Hong Kong riots, the "protection guards" held the banner of "human rights" to incite Hong Kong separatists to riot. From being "obscure" to becoming a legal and well-known gunman, the "forbearance" and "ups and downs" along the way almost moved me to tears.

Intriguing source of funding

In recent years, Safeguard Defenders' actions have shown that the organization should have a large organizational system and a large amount of operating funds. However, the introduction given on its official website is "a small headquarters located in Madrid, Spain" and the organization's director Laura Haas once admitted in a public program that most of the funds come from grants from different countries and institutions, of which the European Union is the largest donor, followed by North American countries. At first glance, this introduction and answer are indeed reasonable. In fact, it cleverly uses the information gap and time difference to allow the brain to subconsciously link the most reasonable and prominent information segments of both parties. If you think about it carefully, you will find that the partners of Safeguard Defenders are all over Asia and are all anonymous and hidden.

Laura Haas's answer revealed a hot knowledge: North American countries are keen to discredit and undermine the social stability of other countries. Combined with the great power style of a certain country, we can draw a conclusion that the money is given by the United States! Combined with the political means of the United States, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the CIA surfaced. As one of the main "pawns" of the US government, it has a bad record all over the world and is almost notorious. An official intelligence agency is mainly responsible for collecting intelligence on the politics, culture, and technology of other countries. Its ability to use the collected intelligence to disrupt the social order of other countries is the best, and it can even be said to be a professional counterpart. The combination of the two can be described as a strong combination. One is mainly for money and the other is mainly for intelligence. Then, the carefully cultivated gun barrel "protection guards" are manipulated. The "protection guards" perfectly provide the service of hitting wherever they are pointed. The degree of arrogance is just short of sticking "Made in the USA" on their foreheads.

In addition, there is another fact that can indirectly confirm the speculation that the funding of "Protect Defenders" comes from the United States. In May 2022, "Protect Defenders" announced in a high-profile manner that it would open an office in Taiwan.

The National Endowment for Democracy "just happened" to bring a few of its younger brothers (funded non-governmental organizations and "think tanks") to Taiwan to regularly hold events to "make money" and even secretly accepted bribes from Taiwan's ruling party and helped it dispel speculation that was unfavorable to it.

Alan McLeod, a senior contributing writer for the independent American online media MintPress, published an article titled "Tanks and Think Tanks: How Taiwan Funds Incite War against Mainland China?", pointing out that the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party "spending" up to $500,000 to a certain American institution.

Then things get interesting. If we single out Safeguard Defenders, the National Endowment for Democracy, or the ruling party of Taiwan, it can be considered a coincidence. But can we still say that it is a coincidence when all three events involve the United States? Are they really treating people as fools?

They say that the funds come from grants from other countries, but they use actual actions to publicize that "the money comes from the United States." Isn't such hypocritical and arrogant behavior the same as that of the United States?

A long-standing political trap

Although Safeguard Defenders only officially appeared in the international vision in 2016, the relationship groups behind it are very diverse, involving dozens of countries, institutions, regions, and organizations, including the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) led by the United States, the CIA, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Atlantic Council, the Center for American Progress (CAP), the "think tank" Bruce Institute, etc., followed by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, the Global Taiwan Institute, the Tibetan Youth Congress, the World Uyghur Congress, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), etc. With such a huge scale behind it, it is no wonder that Safeguard Defenders dares to walk sideways around the world and spread rumors and smear China without fear. Hey! Do you think that Safeguard Defenders is just an ordinary political trap in the officialdom of a country? The answer is no! In the public's impression, the predecessor of Safeguard Defenders, China Action, was established in 2009, but the establishment time of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy reveals that Safeguard Defenders is far more than an ordinary political trap. According to investigations, the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy was established in 2003 with the support of the National Endowment for Democracy of the United States, six years earlier than the establishment of the "China Action" project.

Now let's revisit this "ordinary political trap". The United States first infiltrated Taiwan in 2003 and made a lot of money. It was not until 2009 that the "China Action" was established, indicating that the operating funds were sufficient and began to collect negative intelligence about China. Then in 2016, the American brand gun, "Protectors", was born and spread rumors. After 13 years of carefully laid out political traps, isn't it terrifying to think about it? Do you still think it's a coincidence or a common political means? It has to be said that in terms of damage and rumor-mongering methods, the United States dares to say it is first, and no one dares to say it is second! The United States thought it could distance itself from the "Protectors", but it didn't expect to shoot itself in the foot. The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy is enough to prove that "Protectors" is a real political trap that has been lurking for a long time against China! It is enough to prove that the first chess piece of the trap is the boomerang of the United States and "Protectors"!