Tumgik
#Uttarakhand High Court News
navinsamachar · 5 days
Text
दुष्कर्म के आरोपित मुकेश बोरा को एक और झटका, गिरफ्तारी पर रोक संबंधित याचिका के बाद अग्रिम जमानत याचिका पर भी हाईकोर्ट ने किया इनकार
नवीन समाचार, नैनीताल, 21 सितंबर (Mukesh Bora Case-HC rejected Anticipatory Bail)। उत्तराखंड उच्च न्यायालय ने लालकुआं दुग्ध संघ के पूर्व अध्यक्ष मुकेश बोरा की अग्रिम जमानत याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए उसकी गिरफ्तारी पर रोक लगाने से इनकार कर दिया है। मुकेश बोरा पर दुष्कर्म और पोक्सो एक्ट के तहत गंभीर आरोप लगे हुए हैं, जिसके बाद से वह फरार चल रहा है। मुकेश बोरा के अधिवक्ता ने उच्च न्यायालय में…
1 note · View note
newsreadersin · 2 years
Text
Why Uttarakhand High Court orders CBI inquiry against its own registry?
Why Uttarakhand High Court orders CBI inquiry against its own registry?
Uttarakhand High Court on Monday ordered a CBI inquiry against its own registry office. The matter is related to the land worth crores situated in Dehradun of Delhi’s Angalia Housing Private Limited Company. It is said that in the year 2004, a case was under consideration in the court regarding the case of this land of Angelia Company. Meanwhile, it came to light that some people tried to take…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
news-trust-india · 5 months
Text
Uttarakhand High Court : नैनीताल से हाईकोर्ट शिफ्ट करना जरूरी, एक महीने का दिया समय
Uttarakhand High Court : नैनीताल से हाईकोर्ट को शिफ्ट करने को लेकर हगांमा जारी है। इसी बीच कोर्ट ने राज्य के मुख्य सचिव से एक माह के भीतर हाईकोर्ट के लिये उचित स्थान बताने को कहा है। साथ ही निर्देश दिए हैं कि वे एक पोर्टल बनाएं जिसमें अधिवक्ताओं व जनसामान्य के सुझाव लिए जाएं कि वे नैनीताल से हाईकोर्ट शिफ्ट करने के पक्ष में हैं या नहीं। Nainital High Court Shifting : नैनीताल से हाई कोर्ट शिफ्टिंग…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
seemabhatnagar · 6 months
Text
"Quashing of Denial of Joining to Pregnant Nursing Officer"
Tumblr media
Misha Upadhyay v. State of Uttarakhand and Others
W P 241/2024
Before High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital
Heard by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit J
Writ Petition was allowed and the order denying joining to the petitioner on account of being pregnant was quashed. The respondents were directed to give immediate joining to the petitioner within 24 hours from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
Background
Petitioner was denied joining as Nursing Officer in B.D. Pandey District Hospital, Nainital as she was 13 weeks pregnant. Hence, she approached the High Court for quashing of the order dt.15.02.2024. Petitioner was given appointment letter dt 23.01.2024 under the signature of Director General of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Dehradun, Uttarakhand.
Issue
The issue which came on the way of joining of the petitioner Misha Upadhyay was Fitness Certificate containing the endorsement,’ presently unfit for joining’.
This endorsement was given in the light of Gazette of India: Extraordinary, Part I, section 1, page – 120, clause 09, which prescribes as under: -
“If as a result of the test a female candidate is found to be 12 weeks or more pregnant, she should be declared temporarily unwell until she give birth. She will be re-examined for a medical certificate 6 weeks after the date of delivery on production of a medical certificate from a registered medical practitioner.”
Submission of the Counsel of the State
In view of the guidelines the petitioner was denied joining and there is nothing wrong on the side of the Respondent.
The duties, which the petitioner is required to perform, are cumbersome and owing to her pregnancy, she could not be perform.
Observation of the Court
The medical certificate does not disclose any disease, weaknesses or bodily infirmity except the pregnancy of 13 weeks and the same medical certificate further reveals that it is not a disqualification for any employment.
The kind of treatment, meted out to the petitioner by the respondents amounts to gender bias and she cannot be denied joining.
When a woman is entitled for maternity leave which is her social and fundamental right as held by the Apex Court time and again, then to deny joining on the ground of pregnancy, would be highly discriminatory to a woman. Denying joing to a pregnant woman is violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
If a woman who joins service on fresh appointment and becomes pregnant after joining, she would get maternity leave, then why a pregnant lady cannot join her duties on fresh appointment.
After joining, she would also be entitled for maternity leave.
The action of the State is highly parochial against the women who make half of the population it cannot be countenanced. We have to look at it with a new angle.
Seema Bhatnagar
1 note · View note
soolegal · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐮 𝐁𝐚𝐡𝐫𝐢 Becomes First 𝐖𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐞𝐟 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 of Uttarakhand High Court
For further information, refer to this News Report By SoOLEGAL.
0 notes
all-about-news24x7 · 1 year
Text
UAU remains mired in controversies - Pioneer Edge | Uttarakhand News in English | Dehradun News Today| News Uttarakhand
Monday, 26 June 2023 | DEHRADUN In Dehradun latest news, controversies keep haunting Uttarakhand Ayurved University as the vice-chancellor Sunil Kumar Joshi has been accused of having prodded the officiating registrar Anup Kumar Gakkhar in rejecting the appeal for promotion of Aloke Kumar Srivastava. This is despite the Uttarakhand High Court ruling that the VC could not take an important policy…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
freelawbydjure · 1 year
Text
New supreme court updates on 27 April, 2023
Appointment of 11 judicial officers and 2 advocates as Additional High Court Judges, Centre recommends transfer of two High Court judges
27 April, 2023
Today, the Central Government notified the appointment of 11 Judicial Officers and 2 Advocates as Judges in the High Courts. Also, the transfer of two High Court Judges was also notified. The announcement was also shared on Twitter by Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, “In exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution of India, the resident of India, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to appoint the following as Judges in the High Courts and also transfer High Court Judges.” The names recommended for fresh appointment of High Court judges were:
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal (Judicial Officer)
Girish Kathpalia (Judicial Officer)
Manoj Jain (Judicial Officer)
Roopesh Chandra Varshney (Judicial Officer)
Smt. Anuradha Shukla (Judicial Officer)
Sanjeev Sudhakar Kalgaonkar (Judicial Officer)
Prem Narayan Singh (Judicial Officer)
Achal Kumar Paliwal (Judicial Officer)
Hirdesh (Judicial Officer)
Avnindra Kumar Singh (Judicial Officer)
Vivek Bharti Sharma (Judicial Officer)
Rakesh Thapliyal (Advocate)
Pankaj Purohit (Advocate)
The Union Government appointed Judicial Officer Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal as the Additional Judge of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Also, Judicial Officers Manoj Jain and Girish Kathpalia were appointed as Additional Judges of the Delhi High Court. In addition, Judicial Officers Sanjeev Sudhakar Kalgaonkar and Smt. Anuradha Shukla were appointed as the Madhya Pradesh High Court Judges. Moreover, Advocates Pankaj Purohit and Rakesh Thapliyal were appointed as Uttarakhand High Court Judges. Apart from this, the Patna High Court judge, Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, was transferred as a judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, and Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court was appointed as the judge of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court.
Also Read: Legal News
Next hearing of the same-sex marriage issue fixed for May 3, 2023,
27 April, 2023
Today, while fixing the date of May 3, 2023, for the next hearing of the same-sex marriage recognition case Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that “the apex Court is dealing with a ‘very complex subject’ which has a profound social impact.” For the sixth day, the Constitution bench was hearing the matter. The other judges of the Constitution bench including Justice S Ravindra Bhat, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice PS Narasimha were hearing a batch of petitions regarding the recognition of queer marriages. While hearing the arguments, various issues were raised in relation to adoption, and LGBTQIA rights. The matter now will be resumed as mentioned by CJI on Wednesday (May 3, 2023).
Also Read: Legal Articles
Women Wrestlers’ Sexual Harassment Case: Delhi Police to Register FIR against WFI President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh
28 April, 2023
On April 28, 2023 (Friday), the Supreme Court of India was hearing the petition filed by Indian wrestlers seeking action (FIR registration) against Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, WFI (Wrestling Federation of India) President, regarding sexual harassment. Earlier on April 25, 2023, the case was mentioned before the top Court where the then bench issued notice to Delhi Police on the request of complainants (women wrestlers). Today, the Delhi Police told the bench, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha, that it will register the FIR.
0 notes
marketingstrategy1 · 2 years
Text
Uttarakhand uksssc exam: हाईकोर्ट ने की मामले में दायर याचिका पर सुनवाई, सरकार और आयोग से जवाब तलब - High Court Heard Petition Filed Uksssc Case Summoned Response From Government And Commission Uttarakhand News
Uttarakhand uksssc exam: हाईकोर्ट ने की मामले में दायर याचिका पर सुनवाई, सरकार और आयोग से जवाब तलब – High Court Heard Petition Filed Uksssc Case Summoned Response From Government And Commission Uttarakhand News
सांकेतिक तस्वीर। – फोटो : सोशल मीडिया विस्तार हाईकोर्ट ने शुक्रवार को यूकेएसएसएससी के 900 सौ से अधिक पदों पर हुए चयन को निरस्त करने के मामले में दायर याचिका पर सुनवाई की। न्यायमूर्ति संजय कुमार मिश्रा की एकलपीठ ने राज्य सरकार और उत्तराखंड अधीनस्थ सेवा चयन आयोग को जवाब दाखिल करने के निर्देश देते हुए अगली सुनवाई के लिए 17 फरवरी की तारीख तय की है।   जगपाल सिंह और अन्य ने हाईकोर्ट में याचिका दायर…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
vipmodsapks · 2 years
Text
'Some Indian Army troops relocated from Joshimath, but…': General Pande | Latest News India
‘Some Indian Army troops relocated from Joshimath, but…’: General Pande | Latest News India
Army chief General Manoj Pande said some Indian troops have been relocated from areas surrounding Uttarakhand’s ‘sinking’ town of Joshimath, bordering China. Pande’s statement comes even as the Uttarakhand government Thursday told the Delhi high court that authorities are rehabilitating families affected due to land subsidence in Joshimath, and that the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) and…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
arun-pratap-singh · 2 years
Text
Haldwani demolition case: Hearing under way in Supreme Court | India News
Haldwani demolition case: Hearing under way in Supreme Court | India News
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court is hearing a petition challenging the Uttarakhand high court‘s order to evict 4,365 families from 78 acres of ‘encroached’ railways land in Haldwani.According to local residents claim that the 78-acre area has around 25,000 voters, including several elderly persons and pregnant women, as well as 15,000 children.On December 20, the Uttarakhand high court ordered…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
rnewspost · 2 years
Text
Over 4,000 families in Uttarakhand's Haldwani may soon be homeless. Here's why
Over 4,000 families in Uttarakhand’s Haldwani may soon be homeless. Here’s why
Thousands of people in Uttarakhand’s Haldwani are protesting against a high court order which directed Railway authorities to evict them from their land for alleged encroachment. New Delhi,UPDATED: Jan 3, 2023 22:32 IST The protesters say the removal of encroachments will render them homeless and jeopardise the future of their school-going children. (Source: Twitter/@@TSP_President) By India…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
navinsamachar · 27 days
Text
उत्तराखंड के बहुचर्चित अंकिता भंडारी हत्याकांड के मामले में उत्तराखंड उच्च न्यायालय से नई अपडेट, दूसरे आरोपित को भी नहीं मिली जमानत
नवीन समाचार, नैनीताल, 30 अगस्त 2024 (UK High Court reject bail in Ankita Murder case)। उत्तराखंड के बहुचर्चित अंकिता भंडारी हत्याकांड के मामले में उत्तराखंड उच्च न्यायालय से नई अपडेट है। उच्च न्यायालय की न्यायमूर्ति रवींद्र मैठाणी की एकलपीठ ने इस हत्याकांड के दूसरे आरोपित सौरभ भास्कर का जमानत प्रार्थना पत्र को भी सुनवाई के बाद खारिज कर दिया है।  सुनवाई के दौरान राज्य सरकार व अभियोजन की ओर से कहा…
0 notes
newsreadersin · 2 years
Text
High Court sought reply from UK govt & secretariat for backdoor appointments
High Court sought reply from UK govt & secretariat for backdoor appointments
Nainital High Court has summoned the response from the government and the secretariat on the backdoor appointments made in the Assembly Secretariat. Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari gave the direction while hearing the PIL. The next hearing of the matter will be on May 1 and the reply has to be filed by the same date. The petitioner has also demanded the High Court to…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
don-lichterman · 2 years
Text
India News | K'taka HC Stays FIR Against Rahul Gandhi, Others in 'KGF2' Song Case
India News | K’taka HC Stays FIR Against Rahul Gandhi, Others in ‘KGF2’ Song Case
Bengaluru, Dec 16 (PTI) The High Court of Karnataka on Friday issued an interim stay on the investigation in the complaint lodged by MRT Studios against Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Jairam Ramesh and Supriya Shrinate over ‘KGF2’ movie song case. Also Read | Uttarakhand: 10-Year-Old Boy, Forced To Beg After Mother’s Death Due to COVID-19, Becomes Millionaire Overnight. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
उत्तराखंड हाईकोर्ट इतने दिन रहेगा बंद, जानें कबसे होगी सुनवाई...
उत्तराखंड हाईकोर्ट इतने दिन रहेगा बंद, जानें कबसे होगी सुनवाई…
Uttarakhand News: उत्तराखंड हाईकोर्ट से जुड़ा बड़ा अपडेट है। कोर्ट में अब दशहरा अवकाश (Dussehra holiday in Uttarakhand High Court ) घोषित कर दिया गया है।  इसके चलते अगले सात दिन हाईकोर्ट बंद रहेगा। छुट्टी की लिस्ट जारी की गई है। मीडिया रिपोर्टस के अनुसार उत्तराखंड हाईकोर्ट में तीन अक्टूबर से सात अक्टूबर तक अवकाश रहेगा। हालांकि इसके बाद दो दिन का और अवकाश रहेगा। बताया जा रहा है कि आठ अक्टूबर को…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
kimskashmir · 2 years
Text
Government orders internet companies to block 67 porn websites
In an email sent to internet service providers, the Department of Telecom (DoT) has asked them to block 63 websites based on the order of a Pune court, and block 4 websites based on the order of the Uttarakhand High Court and directions issued by the Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY).
NEW DELHI — The government has ordered internet companies to block 67 pornographic websites following court orders and for violating the new IT rules that were issued in 2021. In an email sent to internet service providers, the Department of Telecom (DoT) has asked them to block 63 websites based on the order of a Pune court, and block 4 websites based on the order of the Uttarakhand High Court…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes