#bone conduction headset market research | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

selflife-hacks-blog · 5 years

Text

How Cell Phone Affects Environmental and Child Health

It was a boon for better communication but do you know how cell phone affects health and usage has many health hazards and retards child development.

Various studies indicate that the emissions from a cell phone hazards on health can be extremely harmful, causing

Genetic damage

Tumors

Memory loss

Increased blood pressure

A weakening of the immune system, ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN.

Cell phones emit radiofrequency radiation (radio waves), a form of non-ionizing radiation, from their antennas.

Parts of the body nearest to the antenna can absorb this energy.

The fact that this radiation is invisible, intangible, and enters and leaves our bodies without our knowledge makes it even more intimidating.

The biological effect of electromagnetic fields is to cause dielectric heating.

A pooled analysis of two case-control studies conducted in Sweden that reported the cell phone effects on health.

Statistically significant trends of increasing brain cancer risk for the total amount of cell phone use and the years of use among people who began using cell phones before age 20

Mobile phones primarily function on electromagnetic waves for all forms of communication, even internal. The brain has its own electric impulses within, which carry out communication in the neural network.

In children, the waves from the phone can easily penetrate right into the interior parts of the brain, since they do not have a strong shield.

Research has shown that by merely talking on the phone for 2 minutes, the electrical activity inside a child’s brain can be changed.

This erratic activity can cause problems in mood patterns, behavioral tendencies,

and have trouble learning new things or focusing properly in this way cell phone affects health

In fact, a 2017 study in the Clinical Psychological Science journal found that for adolescents in grades 8 through 12, increased time on new media (to include social media and smartphones) led to an increased rate of depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates.

SO WHERE WAS IT GOING WRONG AND HOW CELL PHONE AFFECTS HEALTH??

t’s not just teens that are experiencing this constant need to connect with their phones, though. parents are often part of it. According to a study published last year in the journal of Child Development, Teens today are experiencing a slower path to embracing adult responsibilities than ever before. And the researchers concluded that cell phone and tablet engagement was at least partially to blame. Because with social connection always just a few clicks away, Teens today are less likely to leave their homes and seek that connection in the “real” world. Even when they are out in the world, many still experience a difficult time detaching from their phones.

Mobile Phone Safety Tips to Decrease the Risk:

The phone planning

Dr. Hill thinks it’s also about involving kids in those conversations. “There are a lot of reasons a parent might introduce those devices. There’s no one right age, because, depending on your reasons for introducing them, the right age may vary. So, my first question is always, ‘Why does your child need this device?’ Once you’ve answered that question, you can set rules. By this way we can avoid cell phone affects on health

It’s much easier to start doing that from the very beginning than it is to roll back their access once you’ve already given them free reign.”

"Children playing" has a whole new meaning in this generation" Mobile phones are changing human skeleton! Especially people who are hunched to their screens seemed to develop a bony spike on the back of their skulls. Researchers from the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia did the study People are increasingly growing lumps of bone at the bases of their skulls

The bone forms to support bigger, stronger muscles needed to hold our heads Looking down at phones puts extra strain on previously lesser-used muscles

Many people spend more than couple of hours on their mobiles or smart phones or tablets everyday, this directly have effect on their bony architecture.

Researchers study in the Journal of Anatomy said growing numbers of people have growths called enlarged external occipital protuberances(EOP) at the base of their skull.

This bump on our head is mostly cant be visualized or felt with the hand when palpated but these late years many young people seemed to develop the bump which is clearly seen when inspected behind their hair.

Research showing that the bumps are most common among 18 to 30-year-olds.

Click here to read more about Mobile phones are changing human skeleton leading to ”TEXT NECK” (VIDEO)

The Environmental Cost:

While some estimates assert that smartphone lifespans have the potential of reaching up to 5-10 years, most consumers use them for an average of only 12-24 months.

One look at the typical smartphone commercial, and it’s easy to see why. Advertisements for yearly updated models tout innovation and convenience and have stimulated the growth in sales that has made Europe the biggest market for smartphones in the world.

Over 60 percent of mobile phone sales are replacements for already-existing phones, 90 percent of which are still functioning when they are discarded. Consumers want newer, better, faster; and smartphone providers give it to them.

This constant updating has produced a huge amount of e-waste (less than 16 percent formally recycled in 2014), most of which ends up in a landfill where harmful chemicals can leak into groundwater and affect both human and plant life.

By 2020, it’s estimated that the EU will generate more than 12 million tonnes per year of waste from electrical and electronic equipment. Though campaigns around the world work to raise awareness about safe recycling or reusing practices, most of the environmental impact happens before the phones even make it to stores.

Still heavily dependent on fossil fuels, the manufacturing process generates waste that is 200 times the weight of the phone. At first glance, this information appears congruent with a consumer problem. (source)

Few tips to get your child protected :

Avoid giving the cell phones to children under the age of 17.

Young children are yet to develop the skull bone density and protective tissue for the brain, making them vulnerable to bad effects of the radiation.

When your child talks on the phone, opt for a wired headset instead of holding the phone next to the ear.

While traveling, avoid keeping the mobile with the child. The metal body of the vehicle blocks the radiations, which causes the phone to increase its power to catch them.

In areas where the signal strength is weak, do not let your child use the phone.

Mobiles, in such cases, amplify their own radiation to get a good signal strength, which can be harmful to the child.

As an adult, it is important for parents and other people in the house to restrict their use of phones when they are around children. This is not only for purposes of avoiding radiation, but to create a behavior pattern as well.

It is advised to take extra care if there is a mobile phone tower on your building or nearby or even close to the child’s school since their exposure to radiation is more than usual.

Completely restrict your child from taking phones to the school. Keep the school’s contact number and provide them yours in case of an emergency.

Keep your mobile phones safely with you and out of sight of your kids at night. Children may quietly try to get a hold of it and use it without you finding out.

Hope, these few have enlightened the damage caused by the mobile.

Mobile phone on mental health:

Though there are many studies have shown that the fact that spending most of your time online is harmful to your health physically but, a new study has said that text-based messaging apps such as WhatsApp have a positive impact on a person’s psychological well-being.

The research study published on may 31st 2019, in the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies which was titled as “Psychosocial Outcomes Associated with Engagement with Online Chat Systems”, has shown that WhatsApp has positive impact on mental health of users. This test includes an online questionnaire measuring WhatsApp use and motivations, online bonding, quality of relationships, group identity, and psychosocial outcomes.

Clink to know more about WhatsApp is good for your mental health- Research proven

Mobile phones and skin cancer :

Other good things regard mobile usage, is its technology which is using in health care purposes like detection of cancer! you heard it is right. Mobile can cause cancer and can detect cancer;

There are various applications in your smartphone that can help in the detection of skin cancer. Some send photos to a dermatologist, some provide instant feedback and others offer helpful reminders about self-checking your skin and scheduling a doctor’s appointment.

There are few smartphone applications which are available that can help in early diagnosis and tracking of the regular self-examinations.

All you can do is to capture a photo of the marks or mole and track them yourself or send them to you skin doctor. Though these applications are very useful, there are few limitations for these.

Miiskin:

Miiskin is a mole mapping application to analyze your skin. as your dermatologists would perform mole maps as part of a clinical full-body skin exam, using this digital dermoscopy (magnified digital photography) can help in catching suspicious lesions.

This application can capture the high definition dermoscopy photos and provide information more than that of the normal digital photos. According to the website, anyone with an iPhone with iOS 10 and newer or a phone running Android 4.4 and newer can use Miiskin. This Skin Mapping feature provides automatic identification for suspicious moles.

Click her to know more about Mobile apps to detect the skin cancers

CONCLUSION:

Though cell phones are boon in modern technology. There are lots of evil which cannot be avoided but this can be reduced by self and child education about the various health and mental hazards that can be caused by the radiation from the cell phone signals. These few basic precautions around the child help to reduce health hazards and live a healthy life.

Read other articles regarding mental health:

STAGE FEAR: How to get rid of it??

B-Complex Can Treat Panic Attacks and Anxiety

Allergy is associated with depression and anxiety – Research proven

Wrist band that can track your emotions

#brain cancer with cell phones #can mobile phones harm babies #cell phone affects child health #cell phones and child development #cellphones and children #child health and mobiles #health hazards of cell phone #physical health #mental health #recent advances

0 notes

market-insider · 4 years

Text

Headset Market Size Worth $20,465.7 Million By 2024

The headset market size is estimated to reach approximately USD 20,465.7 million by 2024, according to a new study conducted by Grand View Research, Inc. The rise in the disposable income is remarkably driving the demand for application-specific headsets. The increase in consumer spending for consumer electronic products has significantly spurred the market growth. The growing demand for improved design and style is anticipated to favorably impact the industry growth. In addition to this, increasing popularity and adoption of smartphones, portable music players, laptops, tablets, and other mobile devices are expected to catapult the industry growth prospects.

Enhanced audio quality acoustics offered by in-ear products is substantially bringing traction in this industry. The advent of innovative technologies such as Bone Conduction, Near-field Magnetic Inductance (NFMI) Technology, and Design Improvements has led the market to gain traction globally.

For More Details Please Visit @: http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/headset-market

Further key findings from the study suggest:

· The in-ear product segment is projected to gain momentum over the forecast period. The segment was valued at approximately USD 5,162.4 million in 2015 and is projected to reach approximately USD 9,616.7 million by 2024, expanding at a CAGR of 7.2% from 2016 to 2024. Miniaturization, portability, and better comfort are the key advantages impelling the growth of in-ear headsets segment.

· Headsets within the pricing range of USD 50-100 are predicted to witness a high demand during the forecast period. This is mainly due to the introduction of cost-effective quality products within this segment. This segment demand was valued at 95.0 million units in 2015 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 12.4% from 2016 to 2024.

· The commercial application segment is experiencing significant growth owing to the increasing adoption of headsets in BPO enterprises and the media and entertainment industry. The growing demand for enhanced user experience while playing PlayStation or high-quality graphics games on mobile applications has increased the demand for gaming and VR headsets as it stands today. The trend is likely to continue over the forecast period.

· The Asia Pacific region is estimated to be the key market over the forecast period, owing to the increasing demand for headsets in countries such as China, India, and Japan. The availability of low-cost headsets from regional manufacturers is impacting the growth of the headset market positively. Additionally, the availability of affordable headsets manufactured byte leading players in order to remain competitive has also bolstered the market growth in this region. The growing competition among the third-party e-commerce channels (backed with large pockets venture capitals) is another key factor fueling the industry growth.

· The key vendors dominating the industry include Apple, Inc., Sennheiser Electronic GmbH & Co. KG, Sony Corporation, Bose Corporation, JVC Kenwood Corporation, Alclair Audio, Harman International Industries, Inc., and Panasonic Corporation

Grand View Research has segmented the global headset market based on product, price, technology, application, and region:

Headsets Product Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· In-ear

· Over-ear

Headsets Price Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· < 50

· 50-100

· > 100

Headsets Technology Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· Wired

o ANC

o Others

· Wireless

o ANC

o Bluetooth

o NFMI

o�� Smart Headphones

o Others

Headsets Application Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· Personal

o ANC

o Others

o Fitness/Sports

o Gaming

o Virtual Reality

o Casual

· Commercial

o Commercial

o Media and Entertainment

o BPO Enterprises

o Professional

Headsets Regional Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· North America

o U.S.

o Canada

· Europe

o UK

o Germany

· Asia Pacific

o China

o India

o Japan

o South Korea

· Latin America

o Brazil

o Mexico

· The Middle East and Africa

#technology #Headset Market

0 notes

chetanare · 4 years

Text

Global Bone Conduction Headset Market 2020 - Industry Dynamics, Segmentation and Competition Analysis 2024

Global Bone Conduction Headset Market 2020 – Industry Dynamics, Segmentation and Competition Analysis 2024

KandJ Market Research announces that it has promoted a new study Global Bone Conduction Headset: Market Shares, Strategy, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2020 to 2024. The 2020 study has 101 pages, tables and figures.

The key insights of the report:

The report provides key statistics on the market status of the Bone Conduction Headset manufacturers and is a valuable source of guidance and…

View On WordPress

#Bone Conduction Headset Market Key Countries

0 notes

swapnil70-blog · 5 years

Text

Bone Conduction Headset Market Overview with Qualitative analysis, Competitive landscape & Forecast 2025 key players: AfterShokz, Pansonic, Marsboy, Audio Bone, INVISIO, Damson Audio, Motorola, SainSonic, Kscat, Abco Tech, etc.

Industry Overview of Bone Conduction Headset Market

The global Bone Conduction Headset market research report studies market overview defining; definition, types, applications latest trends to identify the revenues and the progress of the market over the forecast period. The report offers preventive and premeditated management along with emphasizes the summary of the global Bone Conduction Headset market along with classifications and market chain structures. It also highlights authorized statistics of the global Bone Conduction Headset market.

Improvement approaches and plans are examined just as assembling procedures and cost structures are additionally investigated. This report likewise states import/trade utilization, free market activity Figures, cost, value, income and gross edges. The report centers around Global real driving Bone Conduction Headset Industry players giving data, for example, organization profiles, item picture and determination, limit, generation, value, cost, income and contact data.

Get a Sample PDF Report: https://www.acquiremarketresearch.com/sample-request/130172/

Key Companies: AfterShokz, Pansonic, Marsboy, Audio Bone, INVISIO, Damson Audio, Motorola, SainSonic, Kscat, Abco Tech, Shenzhen Qili Industrial Co., Ltd

Key Product Type: Wired Type, Wireless Type

Market by Application: Military, Hearing Aid Field, Sports, Others

Bone Conduction Headset MarketThe fundamental purpose of this Bone Conduction Headset marketreport is to provide a correct and strategic analysis of the Profile Projectors industry. The report scrutinizes each segment and sub-segments presents before you a 360-degree view of the said market.It provides a deep insight into the industry parameters by accessing the market growth, consumption volume, the upcoming market trends, and the different prices variation for the forecast year.

The research methodology of the market involves both primary as well as secondary research data sources. It commits different factors affecting Bone Conduction Headset industry such as market environment, various policies of the government, past data and market trends, technological advancements, upcoming innovations, market risk factors, market restraints, and challenges in the industry.

Get Discount on this Report: https://www.acquiremarketresearch.com/discount-request/130172/

The report grants knowledge on the accompanying pointers:

– Market Penetration: Comprehensive data on the items collection of the top players in the Bone Conduction Headset market.

– Product Development/Innovation: Detailed knowledge on the forthcoming advances, R&D actions, and product dispatches in the Bone Conduction Headset market

– Competitive Assessment: top to bottom appraisal of the market systems, geographic and business sections of the main players in the Bone Conduction Headset market

– Market Development: Comprehensive data about developing markets. This report breaks down the market for a different area overall topographies

– Market Diversification: Exhaustive data about new items, undiscovered topographies, late advancements, and capital exposures in the Bone Conduction Headset market

With tables and figures broken down on worldwide Global Bone Conduction Headset market, this research gives key measurements on the condition of the business and is a profitable wellspring in direction and course for organizations and people intrigued by the market.

For compiling the report, data has been derived from a number of paid and unpaid sources such as presentations, white papers, journals, and press releases. It offers in-depth information obtained through extensive primary and secondary research methods. The information has been further assessed using various effective analytical tools. Therefore, the report provides a 360-degree view of market.

Read Complete Report With TOC: https://www.acquiremarketresearch.com/industry-reports/bone-conduction-headset-market/130172/

At last, It includes the methodical description of the various factors such as the Bone Conduction Headset market growth and a detailed information about the different company’s revenue, growth, technological developments, production and the various other strategic developments.

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

0 notes

hello-furiousdazedragon-posts · 5 years

Text

Tactical Headset Market Size, Statistics, Growth, Revenue, Analysis & Trends – Industry Forecast Report 2019-2025

WiseGuyReports.Com Publish a New Market Research Report On –“Tactical Headset Market 2018 — Global Sales,Price,Revenue,Gross Margin and Market Share”.

Report Description: Tactical headsets assist users in retaining situational alertness with high signal competences.

Developments in communication technologies, such as ear canal equipment, bone conduction, and expansion of LTE in professional mobile radios, are contributing towards the growing adoption of tactical headset. In addition, wireless technology in headsets is gaining precedence as it allows user-friendly and allows customized functioning. The need for advanced systems having high-quality audio capabilities to replace the older systems in the military is anticipated to drive the tactical headset market growth.

Countries like the U.K, the U.S., and France are significantly investing in the development and procurement of tactical headset devices. Critical combat situations in the Middle East and Africa are anticipated to contribute to the high penetration of the tactical communications market.

The global Tactical Headset market is valued at xx million US$ in 2018 is expected to reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of xx% during 2019-2025.

This report focuses on Tactical Headset volume and value at global level, regional level and company level. From a global perspective, this report represents overall Tactical Headset market size by analyzing historical data and future prospect. Regionally, this report focuses on several key regions: North America, Europe, China and Japan.

Request Free Sample Report at:https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/3802738-global-tactical-headset-market-research-report-2019

At company level, this report focuses on the production capacity, ex-factory price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer covered in this report.

The following manufacturers are covered: Bose David Clark INVISIO Safariland TEA Headsets Honeywell International Selex ES Cobham Flightcom 3M Saab Group Vitavox Hytera Titan Communication Systems

Segment by Regions North America Europe China Japan

Segment by Type Wired Wireless

Segment by Application Air Force Navy Ground Force

We also can offer customized report to fulfill special requirements of our clients. Regional and Countries report can be provided as well.

View Detailed Report at :https://www.wiseguyreports.com/reports/3802738-global-tactical-headset-market-research-report-2019

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 1 Tactical Headset Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Tactical Headset 1.2 Tactical Headset Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Tactical Headset Production Growth Rate Comparison by Type (2014-2025) 1.2.2 Wired 1.2.3 Wireless 1.3 Tactical Headset Segment by Application 1.3.1 Tactical Headset Consumption Comparison by Application (2014-2025) 1.3.2 Air Force 1.3.3 Navy 1.3.4 Ground Force 1.4 Global Tactical Headset Market by Region 1.4.1 Global Tactical Headset Market Size Region 1.4.2 North America Status and Prospect (2014-2025) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2014-2025) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2014-2025) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2014-2025) 1.5 Global Tactical Headset Market Size 1.5.1 Global Tactical Headset Revenue (2014-2025) 1.5.2 Global Tactical Headset Production (2014-2025) …… 7 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Tactical Headset Business 7.1 Bose 7.1.1 Bose Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.1.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.1.3 Bose Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.1.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.2 David Clark 7.2.1 David Clark Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.2.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.2.3 David Clark Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.2.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.3 INVISIO 7.3.1 INVISIO Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.3.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.3.3 INVISIO Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.3.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.4 Safariland 7.4.1 Safariland Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.4.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.4.3 Safariland Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.4.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.5 TEA Headsets 7.5.1 TEA Headsets Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.5.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.5.3 TEA Headsets Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.5.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.6 Honeywell International 7.6.1 Honeywell International Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.6.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.6.3 Honeywell International Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.6.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.7 Selex ES 7.7.1 Selex ES Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.7.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.7.3 Selex ES Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.7.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.8 Cobham 7.8.1 Cobham Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.8.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.8.3 Cobham Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.8.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.9 Flightcom 7.9.1 Flightcom Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.9.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.9.3 Flightcom Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.9.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.10 3M 7.10.1 3M Tactical Headset Production Sites and Area Served 7.10.2 Tactical Headset Product Introduction, Application and Specification 7.10.3 3M Tactical Headset Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2014-2019) 7.10.4 Main Business and Markets Served 7.11 Saab Group 7.12 Vitavox 7.13 Hytera 7.14 Titan Communication Systems

Continued…

About Us: Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Research Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the global.

#Tactical Headset Market

0 notes

marketresearchreportsnews-blog · 6 years

Text

Headset Market Industry Share by Manufacturers, Types and Current Scenario 2018-2024 : Grand View Research, Inc.

The headsets market is estimated to reach approximately USD 20,465.7 million by 2024, according to a new study conducted by Grand View Research, Inc. The rise in the disposable income is remarkably driving the demand for application-specific headsets. The increase in consumer spending for consumer electronic products has significantly spurred the market growth. The growing demand for improved design and style is anticipated to favorably impact the industry growth. In addition to this, increasing popularity and adoption of smartphones, portable music players, laptops, tablets, and other mobile devices are expected to catapult the industry growth prospects.

Full Research Report On Headsets Market Analysis: http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/headset-market

Further key findings from the study suggest:

· The Asia Pacific region is estimated to be the key market over the forecast period, owing to the increasing demand for headsets in countries such as China, India, and Japan. The availability of low-cost headsets from regional manufacturers is impacting the growth of the market positively. Additionally, the availability of affordable headsets manufactured byte leading players in order to remain competitive has also bolstered the market growth in this region. The growing competition among the third-party e-commerce channels (backed with large pockets venture capitals) is another key factor fueling the industry growth.

View More Reports Of This Category By Grand View Research At: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry/electronic-devices

Grand View Research has segmented the global headsets market based on product, price, technology, application, and region:

Headsets Product Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· In-ear

· Over-ear

Headsets Price Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· < 50

· 50-100

· > 100

Headsets Technology Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· Wired

o ANC

o Others

· Wireless

o ANC

o Bluetooth

o NFMI

o Smart Headphones

o Others

Headsets Application Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· Personal

o ANC

o Others

o Fitness/Sports

o Gaming

o Virtual Reality

o Casual

· Commercial

o Commercial

o Media and Entertainment

o BPO Enterprises

o Professional

Headsets Regional Outlook (Revenue (USD Million), Volume (Million Units), 2013 - 2024)

· North America

o U.S.

o Canada

· Europe

o UK

o Germany

· Asia Pacific

o China

o India

o Japan

o South Korea

· Latin America

o Brazil

o Mexico

· The Middle East and Africa

Access Full Press Release Of This Report By Grand View Research:

https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-headset-market

About Grand View Research

Grand View Research, Inc. is a U.S. based market research and consulting company, registered in the State of California and headquartered in San Francisco. The company provides syndicated research reports, customized research reports, and consulting services. To help clients make informed business decisions, we offer market intelligence studies ensuring relevant and fact-based research across a range of industries, from technology to chemicals, materials and healthcare.

For more information: www.grandviewresearch.com

#Headset Industry #Headset Market Growth

0 notes

rupalipawar77-blog · 6 years

Text

Global Bone Conduction Headset Industry Market Share , Technology, Growth and Forecast to 2025

Global Bone Conduction Headset Market

WiseGuyRerports.com Presents “Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Research Report 2018” New Document to its Studies Database. The Report Contain 112 Pages With Detailed Analysis.

Description

Global Bone Conduction Headset market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including

AfterShokz Pansonic Marsboy Audio Bone INVISIO Damson Audio Motorola SainSonic Kscat Abco Tech Shenzhen Qili Industrial Co., Ltd

Get sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/3042256-global-bone-conduction-headset-market-research-report-2018

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Bone Conduction Headset in these regions, from 2013 to 2025 (forecast), covering United States EU China Japan South Korea Taiwan

On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Wired Type Wireless Type

On the basis of the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including Military Hearing Aid Field Sports Others

Complete Report Details @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/reports/3042256-global-bone-conduction-headset-market-research-report-2018

Table of Contents -Major Key Points

Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Research Report 2018 1 Bone Conduction Headset Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Bone Conduction Headset 1.2 Bone Conduction Headset Segment by Type (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Bone Conduction Headset Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category)(2013-2025) 1.2.2 Global Bone Conduction Headset Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2017 1.2.3 Wired Type 1.2.4 Wireless Type 1.3 Global Bone Conduction Headset Segment by Application 1.3.1 Bone Conduction Headset Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2013-2025) 1.3.2 Military 1.3.3 Hearing Aid Field 1.3.4 Sports 1.3.5 Others 1.4 Global Bone Conduction Headset Market by Region (2013-2025) 1.4.1 Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2013-2025) 1.4.2 United States Status and Prospect (2013-2025) 1.4.3 EU Status and Prospect (2013-2025) 1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2013-2025) 1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2013-2025) 1.4.6 South Korea Status and Prospect (2013-2025) 1.4.7 Taiwan Status and Prospect (2013-2025) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Bone Conduction Headset (2013-2025) 1.5.1 Global Bone Conduction Headset Revenue Status and Outlook (2013-2025) 1.5.2 Global Bone Conduction Headset Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2013-2025)

……

7 Global Bone Conduction Headset Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 AfterShokz 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Bone Conduction Headset Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 AfterShokz Bone Conduction Headset Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2013-2018) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Pansonic 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Bone Conduction Headset Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 Pansonic Bone Conduction Headset Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2013-2018) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Marsboy 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Bone Conduction Headset Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 Marsboy Bone Conduction Headset Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2013-2018) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Audio Bone 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Bone Conduction Headset Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product B 7.4.3 Audio Bone Bone Conduction Headset Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2013-2018) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 INVISIO 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Bone Conduction Headset Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 INVISIO Bone Conduction Headset Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2013-2018) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview

……..CONTINUED

NORAH TRENT

Partner Relations & Marketing Manager

[email protected]

www.wiseguyreports.com

Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US)

Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK)

About Us

Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, Industry research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports understand how essential statistical surveying information is for your organization or association. Therefore, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available.

0 notes

daniel1244martinez · 6 years

Link

Bone Conduction Headset Market

The Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Report that gives meticulous investigation of current scenario of the market size, share, demand, growth, trends, and forecast in the coming years. The report on Global Bone Conduction Headset market evaluates the growth trends of the industry through historical study and estimates future prospects based on comprehensive research done by the analysts. The study extensively provides the market share, growth, trends and forecasts for the period 2018-2025. The market size in terms of revenue (USD MN) is calculated for the study period along with the details of the factors affecting the market growth (drivers and restraints).

Request for Sample of Report @ https://www.reportsmonitor.com/request-sample/?post=625863

The Bone Conduction Headset Market report displays the Production, Consumption, revenue, Gross margin, Cost, Gross, market share, CAGR, and Market influencing factors of the Bone Conduction Headset industry and forecast to 2025, from 2018.

The report classifies the market into different segments based on workflow, mode and services. These segments are studied in detail incorporating the market estimates and forecasts at regional and country level. The segment analysis is useful in understanding the growth areas and probable opportunities of the market.

Forged Aluminum Wheels market forecast period of five years regions including:

United States, EU, China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan.

Bone Conduction Headset Market Major Key Players:AfterShokz, Pansonic, Marsboy, Audio Bone, INVISIO, Damson Audio, Motorola, SainSonic, Kscat, Abco Tech, Shenzhen Qili Industrial Co., Ltd.

Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Segmented by Types: Wired Type, Wireless Type.

Applications analyzed in this report are: –Military, Hearing Aid Field, Sports, Others.

Some points from TOC:

1 Industry Chain Analysis

1 Global Bone Conduction Headset Market, by Type

2 Global Bone Conduction Headset Market, by Application

3 Global Bone Conduction Headset Production, Value ($) by Region (2012-2017)

4 Global Bone Conduction Headset Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2012-2017)

5 Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Status and SWOT Analysis by Regions

6 Competitive Landscape

7 Global Bone Conduction Headset Market Analysis and Forecast by Type and Application

8 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

9 New Project Feasibility Analysis

10 Research Finding and Conclusion

Have any Query Regarding this Report? Contact us at :– https://www.reportsmonitor.com/make-enquiry/?post=625863

Then, the report focuses on Global major leading industry players with information such as company profiles, product picture and specifications, sales, market share and contact information. What’s more, the Bone Conduction Headset industry development trends and marketing channels are analysed.

About Us

Reports Monitor (ReportsMonitor.com) is a platform for companies looking to meet their market research and business intelligence requirements. Our aim is to change the dynamics of the Market Research industry by providing quality intelligence backed by data. Your requirement for market forecasting is fulfilled by our exclusive quantitative and analytics driven intelligence. We have a vast collection of reports, covering maximum industries Global. Our process is meticulously planned and executed in order to use maximum resources and explore the market for getting genuine insights. The prime focus is to get reliable data, Decision makers can now rely on our distinct data gathering methods to get factual market forecasting and detailed analysis.

Jay Matthews

Direct: +1 513 549-5911

Email: [email protected]

#IFTTT #WordPress

0 notes

endashemdash · 7 years

Text

Preliminary ideas around prostheses

I've only just begun research into prosthetics, but already a theme has emerged: I’m starting to feel that what is needed is to productise prosthetics. This will achieve a few things:

Prostheses are hard to find now, even for those who need them. Most often a doctor will be able to refer a patient to one orthopedist, who will have one prosthetic option available. Don’t like it? Tough luck.

Currently they're considered medical devices, rather than consumer products. This makes sense to you, doesn't it? But glasses were also once considered medical devices, and now are coveted fashion items for many. How would prostheses change if we were able to change their perception from medical devices to desireable consumer products?

Commercial opportunity could encourage development, driving costs of production and ownership down. There's nothing that can make things easier to manufacture like market forces can.

So what are three ways to productise prosthetics?

1. Create a retail store for everyday prostheses.

You're walking along in Soho, peering into the window displays of different boutiques. You come up on a store that has an alluring aesthetic but you don't quite get what they're selling. It's called Super Humans which piques your interest.

You walk in and you learn that it's a store about enhancing human abilities in various ways. There's a sections called Super Sight with eyewear, cameras, braille displays, and echolocation headsets. The Super Hearing section has AirPods, cochlear implants that connect to your iPhone, and bone conduction headphones.

But there's also a Super Strength section with cool bionic arms on display, as well as exoskeleton suits that let you lift heavier weights, or can help you walk if you don't have full leg function. There's a Super Brain section that includes memory aids, smartphones, VR headsets, and meditation products.

Super Humans can be a store where it's natural to want to add things to your body, whether to help you regain function of your limbs, or to simply do things you were already doing but better.

2. Create a universal easy mechanical attachment system for connecting devices to the human body

The idea is that an attachment system could transform anything into a prosthesis. MIT Media Lab's Hugh Herr argues that we "still do not understand how to attach devices to the body mechanically," so maybe this could be a worthy problem to address.

Herr's lab addresses this issue with lots of technology: they use a complex machine to carefully measure the hardness of points distributed around the attachment site, and then combine the data with a 3D scan to produce a socket that varies in hardness and softness in response. This sound spromising and he claims that the wearability of prosthetic legs increases dramatically with this technology, but it would probably be costly to do at scale.

I brainstormed some ideas with Amy and she proposed an interesting low-fi alternative: use a sheet of something like plasticine, with rigid dots embedded in it, and wrap it around the attachement site. Depending of the hardness of the different points on the site, teh dots will push into the sheet at varying depths. This will give you a hardness map and potentially a mouldable surface (the plasticine or whatever other material is more appropraite for this).

Regardless, if devices were more easily attached to the body, then not only would the comfort and wearability of current prostheses improve, but the possibilty for new categories of prostheses could open up. Prototyping an idea where X is attached to the back of my forearm or Y is hanging off of the back fo my thigh would become easier to do. Who knows what that could open up?

3. Design and mock up a prosthesis targeting everyday users

This could be one proof of concept for a prosthesis that is targeted at a general audience but happens to include some medically useful functions. It can then be referenced by others when designing their own prosthetic products.

It could be a third arm, in the vein of the Third Thumb project or the second set of arms designed by a student that are controlled by the wearer's leg movements. It could be a prosthetic tail (which I am envisioning in our Future Wearables class) that acts both as a third hand for holding things, as well as assisting people get out of chairs (potentially useful for seniors and people with muscular dystrophy, for example).

The potential outcome of this direction is harder to predict at this point wihtout doing more research into specific needs of people with amputations, conditions like muscular dystrophy, and others. But the point would be that the prosthesis should be equally attractive to those who need it medically, and those who want it for its everyday utility and aesthetic.

#thesis #prosthesis #augmented humanity #super humans #superpowers #ideas

0 notes

technologywearables · 7 years

Text

The Market for Hearable Devices 2016-2020 - And then there were Airpods…

Apple's unanticipated access into the hearables market advertises a period of major change. The result is most likely to be a much faster transfer to cordless headphones, an acceleration in the take-up of earbuds, and the possibility of a general market income exceeding $40 billion in 2020.

On September 7th 2016, Apple made three statements that look readied to modify the program of the hearables market. One had been forecasted - the removal of the 3.5 mm sound jack from the apple iphone 7. It was a change that they explained as daring, yet which numerous decried as retrograde. Nonetheless, it fundamentally changed the characteristics of the market for wireless headphones. The second 2 news were much bigger surprises. Apple had designed its own cordless chip, and they were entering the hearables world by releasing their own brand of earbuds, called Airpods. Both were unanticipated relocations. The pistol starting the hearables race had currently been terminated, today it became evident that the race was serious.

Life before Airpods The hearables market goes back to the very first Bluetooth headsets which were released in 2001, adhered to by wireless stereo headphones, which got here a few years later. Neither made great waves out there - headsets were connected with cabbies instead of celebrities and Bluetooth stereo headphones took practically a decade to obtain any type of market share. In 2013, that started to transform. Significant brand names were taken by shock as consumers began to purchase cordless headphones. The most trustworthy factor I've listened to for the change is that it was owned by the growth of mobile video on larger phones, with customers preferring to disregard the nuisance of cables when sitting tight display horizontally. That's sustained by research study from Parks Associates [1] showing the typical US mobile phone individual stream songs or video clip for 90 minutes each day. Whatever the reason for the abrupt appeal, there is no doubt that they are currently fashionable.

NPD, which tracks retail sales in the US, has actually reported a huge boost in sales [2], as Figure 1 illustrates. In June 2016, they reported that the total value of wireless headphone sales in the US surpassed that of wired headphones, (although the percent of sales by units was still just 17% for cordless). With the Airpod news, the loss of physical audio jack on the iPhone 7 and Apple's new W1 cordless chip currently being utilized in the most up to date Defeats earphones, there is little doubt that the value of sales of cordless earphones will keep on rising.

The genuine hearables revolution started in 2014 when 2 European companies launched crowdfunding advocate earbuds. In Sweden, Earin acquired financing for a pair of Bluetooth earbuds which would stream audio. 1,500 kilometres further south, in Munich, another startup - Bragi, raised the extraordinary sum of $3.39 m for a far more ambitious hearable gadget - the Dashboard. Like Earin's item, the Dashboard could stream music. But it could additionally save as well as play music without the existence of a phone, as well as housing a host of biometric sensors which would feed back data to a variety of physical fitness applications. Targeted at runners and athletes, it caught the creativity of over fifteen thousand backers as well as turned the ear right into a topic of extreme growth. It was a significantly over-ambitious access product, but Bragi have managed to obtain it to market and developed themselves as the poster child of hearables, effectively shooting the starting pistol. In their wake, much more have taken up the challenge.

At this factor I should clarify exactly what I mean by a hearable gadget. Previously I defined a hearable as any type of gadget which consisted of cordless connection, as the distinguishing variable in between wired as well as cordless earphones. That consisted of wireless stereo earphones and also mono Bluetooth earpieces, but excluded most listening to aids which had no cordless link to a phone. In just two years, the photo has actually ended up being even more intricate. When I coined the word "hearables" at the start of 2014 [3], the cordless earphone market was still niche, and nobody had actually thought about sound seclusion, audio curation or translation as real customer chances. Every one of those are now in advancement or currently shipping.

So currently I'm thinking about anything that suits or on an ear which contains a wireless link, whether that's for audio, or remote control of audio enhancement (qv). Apple's Airpods and cordless headphones will possibly drive the quantity is for earbuds over the next couple of years, however the actual innovation in hearables will come from other earbud developers, not the very least because of their desire to include biometrics. The intimate, fairly isolated contact that earbuds provide, together with the stabilising effect on balance from the semi-circular canals in our ears, suggests that the ear is among the most effective areas for noticing several physical criteria [4] Whilst several of the biometrics will certainly not apply to earphones, some will certainly be, as well as we will see them included in brand-new earphone layouts.

Jabra's brand-new CEO, Rene Tune-Svendsen defined the market as "adding wearable modern technology to songs" [5] I like that approach, but I do not believe it goes much sufficient. Music is the clothes-line on which most hearables will certainly be hung, the applications being taken into consideration are a lot more diverse compared to what we've seen so much with various other wearables.

A identical area of advancement, which will certainly drive innovation in both earbuds and earphones will be the increase of voice communications for Internet of Voice (IoV) applications, where chatting ends up being as essential as listening. That will see developments in directional microphones, both in the transducers and the processing to manage multi-microphone arrays. Bone conduction is currently in usage in order to help with voice discovery as well as processing as well as will certainly become much more common.

Allied to that is an expanding set of sound processing abilities that go past noise cancellation to include enhancements to curate our daily sound and select precisely what we wish to hear. I now consist of any one of these attributes as the certifying factor for a hearable, although I often tend to add the qualifying aspect that they need to be wireless relative to their audio source or regulating tool. That may be a solitary cordless link to a pair of earphones or tethered earbuds, or different cordless web links to left and also appropriate earbuds.

These series of alternatives will result in a lot greater distinction in the market and also blur the limits in between basic cordless earphones, complex sound processing earbuds and listening device. All now suited the spectrum of hearables and it is progressively most likely that it will certainly be a spectrum that individuals relocate through during the course of their lives. When a brand can win the ears of a young adult, it might own those ears for life. That is an effective incentive to stimulate innovation.

The wrist goes limp Wearable products have actually been pressed onto the market considering that the early 2000s, with limited customer interest or sales ... For the full record by WT|Technology Globe Cup judge Nick Hunn please most likely to his site: http://www.wifore.com/

#wearables

0 notes

lightningwolf66 · 7 years

Text

ATTACK OF THE CELL PHONE ZOMBIES

New Post has been published on http://app2chart.com/attack-of-the-cell-phone-zombies/

ATTACK OF THE CELL PHONE ZOMBIES

“Zombies. man. They creep me out.” -Dennis Hopper in the Land Of The Dead.

Book Excerpt:

By William Thomas

They are everywhere.

And they are winning.

Walk down virtually any metropolitan street, if you still dare, and you will discern with a jolt of alarm that no one around you is aware of each other’s presence or their surroundings as they shuffle past with the shambling gait of automatons. Hearing blocked by blaring or blathering headsets, heads bent over cell phones, iPods, palm pilots, multimedia players, text messagers and other hypnotic gadgetry, these walking dead with their vacant stares are so far departed from the reality around them they don’t even know they’re gone.

Cell phone zombies are proliferating everywhere. Spread by the most virulent contagion on Earth – the lust to own and continuously jack into wireless technology – addictive endorphin jolts sent by cell phones to the brain threaten agonizing withdrawal, even as their invisible emanations attack the frontal lobes, short-circuiting memory, awareness and cognitive thought.

Succumbing to the identical marketing strategies marshaled by the same advertising agencies pushing tobacco onto children, hordes of cell phone zombies as young as four-years-old are replacing normal human relationships with the cold calculus of truncated text messages, while disturbing their sonic space and interrupting conversations with friends and spouses to jabber with ghosts who are not even present, even as they spread the blight of their second hand microwaves among the last pockets of cell phone resistance.

Unlike the flesh-munching ghouls depicted in Hollywood horror flicks, which die and “reanimate” through the transmission of the Solanum virus through a usually gruesome exchange of bodily fluids, “voodoo zombies” are created by potions and spells cast by Haitian hougnan priests.

“Zombie powder,” as Max Brooks notes in his essential ZOMBIE Survival Guide, “contains a very powerful neurotoxin” not unlike the pervasive brain-eating chemicals added to food, soft drinks and other drugs – including (as we have seen elsewhere in this book) fluoride, aspartame and mercury. Separately and in combination, these insidious compounds are synergistically activated by pulsating electromagnetic emissions that mimic and override normal cellular functioning to destroy brain neurons and turn people into zombies.

Held entranced as their life force is leached away by devices eerily similar in size and shape to the voodoo dolls used to cast curses, cell phone zombies are especially dangerous, because unlike real Solanum-inducted zombies incapable of expressing feelings or speech, cell phone zombies can appear nearly normal when not jacked in. A real zombie, when it encounters you, “will home in like a smart bomb,” Brooks explains, and start gnawing your face. A cell phone-voodoo zombie “will take a moment to try to figure out who or what you are.”

Smiling a reflexive, unfelt apology for their intrusion – even “growling if hurt or provoked” as Brooks describes – many cell phone zombies “understand words; some even understand simple sentences [and] possess the ability to speak – simply, of course – and rarely for extended conversations.”

TILL DEATH DO YOU APART While not known to devour human flesh like “real” zombies, their mindless preoccupation with themselves, slavish fixation on meaningless distractions, and complete disregard for their rapidly deteriorating ecologic, economic and Constitutional environment threaten to spill from the worst zomboid infestations in the United States across the entire globe.

Certainly, the carnage caused by their mindless wars against non-threatening nations on which American zombies project their paranoia is consuming bone and gristle, hopes and dreams by the boxcar loads. With more than one million people – mostly children – killed in Iraq since 2003 by zombie-like GIs hopped up on anti-malarial pills and Dexedrine, fear, stress, exhaustion and the potent spells of patriotism and “revenge” for non-existent crimes, America’s blindly-following zombie legions are as dangerous to any country they overrun as the horrors described by Brooks in his best-selling account of the zombie wars. [World War Z]

CELL PHONE CARNAGE Still, innocent bystanders and drivers can be at grave risk from deranged zombies talking on their cell phones while operating heavy fast-moving vehicles.

In cities that have not yet disarmed cell phone-brandishing drivers, the resulting daily carnage is as gory as any scene out of “Night Of The Living Dead”. Stunned by an additional $4 billion a year in claims for drivers using cell phones, North American insurers discovered that juggling phones while driving is not causing a 600% increase in accidents. Other drivers busy shaving, applying makeup, tuning radios, taming pets, pouring coffee, eating meals, retrieving dropped cigarettes, talking to passengers or attempting various sexual gymnastics are even more preoccupied.

Cell phones are much worse than lmerely dangerous driving distractions. Tests conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy found that using a cellphone turns drivers into zombies, severely impairing their memories and reaction times by disrupting signals to and within their brains. Hands-free mobile phones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units.

Phoning from inside a car or truck is a bad call for everyone in the vehicle – especially children – because the surrounding steel structure amplifies cellphone emissions. The UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee reports, “using a mobile phone in a vehicle can accelerate radiation levels by up to 10-fold due to resonance effect.”

For all drivers dialing out, Swiss researchers have found “changes of brain function induced by pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields outlast the exposure period.” University of Toronto investigators report that the heightened probability of cracking up your car persists for up to a half-hour after completing a call.

That’s comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk exclaims Dr. Chris Runball, chairman of the B.C. Medical Association’s emergency medical services committee.

“Talking on a cell phone makes you drive like a retiree even if you’re only a teen,” reports the University of Utah, after finding that when motorists as young as 18 talk on their cell phones, “they drive like elderly people, moving and reacting more slowly and increasing their risk of accidents.” Only hands-free phones were used in the study.

“If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cell phone, his reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver,” says David Strayer, a University of Utah psychology professor and principal author of the study. “It’s like instant aging.” (Except studies have shown older, more experienced drivers are much more cautious – and safer – than testosterone-addled teens.) [AP Feb 2/05; Human Factors Winter/05]

Cell phone users are also as impaired as alcoholics. The quarterly journal Human Factors and Ergonomics Society reports that motorists talking on cell phones are actually more impaired than drunk drivers with blood-alcohol levels exceeding 0.08. It doesn’t matter whether the phone is hand-held or hands free.

EM engineer Alasdair Philips of Britain’s Powerwatch looked for people under age 40 using cell phones more than four hours a day, and found them already retired as “unfit for future work” due to early onset dementia. Philips says, “I would rate over four hours per day cell-phone use as potentially as dangerous as drinking a bottle of spirits per day – only it will damage the user’s brain function rather than kidney function, and we don’t yet have brain transplants.”

SAFETY TIP: Protect yourself from zombies operating motor vehicles! If you are driving and spot someone using a cell phone in a vehicle nearby, pull off the road and seek cover as soon as it is safe to do so. Or maneuver behind that driver and increase your distance accordingly. Do not open fire. “Self-defense” is not yet a legal defense for shooting drivers wielding cell phones.

PHONING FETUSES If infants are born zombies, we are doomed. In the world’s most extensive, government-funded report on cell phone radiation, biomedical expert Dr. Stan Barnett described cell phone radiation effects on fetal tissue. After its release in June 1994 by a reluctant Australian government, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) described laboratory tests as far back December 1974 showing how neurons in the soft skulls of developing fetuses are extremely sensitive to heat during the process of cell division.

“The mother’s pelvic structure promotes deep RF radiation penetration and that radiation can be absorbed within the developing embryo or fetus,” Dr. Barnett warned. The womb’s saline fluid is also highly conductive to Radio Frequencies and microwaves – and the EMF-conductive human body is 65% water-by-weight. [CSIRO June 1994; irf.univie.ac.at/emf]]

Whether cell phone radiation cooks the baby’s brain or destroys its rapidly dividing brain cells through microwave radiation, “the resulting neural deficit may not be restored,” Dr. Barnett found. Perhaps not wanting to terrify the public, he neglected to add that this fetal brain damage from cell phones could easily lead to zombification. But he did add that though the fetus may continue to develop and appear normal, her brain functioning may be reduced for life. [EMFacts Consultancy Mar 26/03]

PhD Robert Kane points to corroborative research showing that all fetuses “showed growth retardation from cell phone exposure” – with female offspring exhibiting the highest risk of “impaired learning ability.” When we recall that cell phone zombies speak largely in clichés, corporate jingles and broken sentences we can see how insidiously far-reaching this process has already gone.

Associated Bioelectromagnetics Technologists findings also show that RF exposure from cell phones and cell phone relay towers “is wholly correlated with the repeatedly documented increased incidence of autism – now reported by at least some researchers as greater than 1 per 100 newborn.”

God have mercy on us all. If one in a hundred infants are not actually autistic but hard-to-differentiate zombies – we may find ourselves overwhelmed within another generation.

TOASTED TOTS No one saw it coming. At first a cumbersome novelty, then a faddish convenience, the turning point in the zombification of humanity came in 2006, when corporate hougnan witch doctors casting microwaves began targeting the newborn. Already brain damaged by forced mercury injections in multiple infant vaccines, these newly arrived humans were taken home and bathed in electromagnetic smog invisibly spread by wireless routers, portable phones and intercom “sentries” placed in close proximity to their cribs.

The next step in their zombification came in putting cuddly “kiddy” phones capable of speed-dialing grandma and grandpa into the grasping hands of four year-olds. Soon, humans just out of the womb will no doubt be taking congratulatory calls at their mother’s breasts.

Some of us tried to resist. The MO1 developed by the toy company Imaginarium and telcom giant Telefónica in Spain prompted parental groups across Europe to demand a government ban on inflicting cell phones on children. Jóvenes Verdes, an environmental advocacy group for young Spanish persons, denounced the mobile telephone industry for “acting like the tobacco industry by designing products that addict the very young.”

In Paris, where the curvy crimson-and-blue MO1 “beginner” mobile phone for 6-year-olds has overcome defenders by promising “peace of mind” – or maybe no mind at all – the French health minister has issued a public warning against “excessive” mobile phone use by young children. “I believe in the principle of precaution,” muttered Monsieur Bachelot. “If there is a risk, then children with developing nervous systems would be affected. I’ve alerted parents about the use of mobile telephones because it’s absurd for young children to have them.”

Also concerned about the zombification of the young, Frank Barnes, a professor of engineering at the University of Colorado who led a study showing that children are at special risk from cell phones, told the press: “This clearly is a population that is going to grow up with a great deal of larger exposure than anybody else because the kids use the phones all the time.”

TARGETING CHILDREN Responding to relentless advertising spells and giveaways, the age of cell phone users continues to drop as fast as their IQ and attention span. In 2007, the average age of first-time “users” was 10. Within the next two years, International Data Corp forecasts the 9-and-under market will rack up an additional $1.6 billion in revenue for cell phone companies – and add another nine million child zombies in the United States alone.

Despite desperate rear-guard stands, the last holdouts against child zombification in the European Union are crumbling. As Dorjeen Carvajal reports, “Telephone use is also getting more precocious in Europe, according to a Eurobarometer survey of almost 1,000 children in 29 countries, most of whom had telephones after age 9.”

The mobile telephone industry “is reaching deeper into saturated markets to tap customers with chubby hands capable of cradling both dolls and phones,” Carvajal comments. As cell phone users in their ‘tweens and teens drive subscriber- growth everywhere, International Data Corp projects that by 2010, 31 million children could become zombies from holding miniature microwave ovens to their vulnerable soft brain tissue.

Targeting the youth market for zombification is especially cynical because children treat their microwave phones like a doudou or stuffed animal companion, the French mobile phone trade association AFOM revealed after surveying the habits of children too young to discriminate against dangers proffered by adults they trust.

Cell phone-toting tots also spend more of their parent’s money on the latest games, ring tones and wallpapers – and teens chatter even more than adults on their cell phones, greatly increasing cell phone company profits. Not to mention their own risks of developing allergies, senility, cataracts, learning disabilities, hyper activity disorders and brain tumors. [Intl Herald Tribune Mar 7/08]

Brain-damaging cell phone exposure continues through childhood. A 1996 study probing the “Electromagnetic Absorption in the Human Head and Neck for Mobile Telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz,” conducted by the fabulously named Dr. Om Gandhi showed electromagnetic radiation from cell phones “coupling” even more alarmingly with the electrically active brains of children, than through the thicker carapaces of cumulatively compromised adults.

“I didn’t know at the time industry was targeting children as the next growth segment. Boy, they really got after me,” Dr. Gandhi says, after he found that the thinner outer ears and skulls of children allow more energy from their cell phones to short-circuit delicate brain tissue. “The reason industry doesn’t like it,” Gandhi explains – “They don’t want to lose this part of the market.” [IEEE Transactions of Microwave Theory and Techniques Oct/96]

“We’re pretty bullish on increased usage by teenagers,” exudes Adam Guy, a senior analyst at the Strategist Group. “Usage penetration is exploding.”

So is brain penetration. Guy’s gushing followed yet another study – this one published in the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry – found that heavy cell phone use can cause brain cancer and other diseases in children, as well as adults by interfering with DNA repair

Speaking directly to cell phone zombification and death, Dr. Theodore Litovitz, a biophysicist and professor emeritus of physics at Catholic University, explains: “Because stress proteins are involved in the progression of a number of diseases, heavy daily cell-phone usage could lead to great incidence of disorders such as Alzheimer’s and cancer.” [Reuters Apr 23/08; wirelessconsumers.org Dec03/01]

A ZOMBIE CASE HISTORY In Claysburg, Pennsylvania, Greg Pozgar resisted buying a mobile phone for his then 12-year-old daughter, Morgan. “My biggest concern was whether my children were responsible enough to handle it,” he said.

No one told him to worry about its emanations.

After receiving her first cell phone as a Christmas gift that year, young Morgan went on to become a champion of text messaging at age 13 in a national $25,000 competition organized by the electronics manufacturer LG. This is the company that in 2007 made Europe’s “fashion handset of choice” by offering a “Chocolate phone” featuring an advanced touchscreen interface, instead of conventional keypad. [techdigestuk.typepad.com]

Competing Motorola’s V220’s Tri-Band promises “network connection” between zombies-under-construction in countries becoming saturated in brain numbing electrosmog. The “stylish” V220 offers chic brain damage, exciting car crashes, no-fear-of-pregnancy sterility or classic cancer – in pink.

After hesitating over heath concerns, Disney has also jumped into the kiddy cell phone sweepstakes. Mattel markets a Barbie cell phone for girls 8 to 14. “Nine-year-old Trey Chapman loves the cool design, flashing lights and big buttons – one for mom and one for dad,” chuckled USA Today. How well Ms. Chapman will enjoy her daughter’s reduced learning ability, asthma and other potentially debilitating maladies was not mentioned. [USA Today Mar 14/05]

Verizon has also responded with its popular “parent capable” LG VX8300. The “Chaperone” cell phone puts the “home” in Homeland Security. Now parents can harass their kids with text messages while tracking them through GPS satellite locators built into their continuously radiating cell phones. Every time a young family member enters or leaves an electronically designated “Child Zone”, participating parents receive automated text messages informing them of their child’s movements – “So you can relax wherever you are.” [verizonwireless.com; Intl Herald Tribune Mar 7/08]

Whether this home surveillance puts a crimp in the sexually transmitted diseases currently afflicting one in four American teenage girls, or their nearly one-in-three pregnancies before the age of 20 remains to be seen. [Reuters Apr 23/08]

The good news and the bad news is that cigarettes are being replaced by mobile phones. Unable to afford both addictions, teen smoking fell off sharply in 1996 – the same year mobile phone use skyrocketed among 15- to 17-year-olds. And no wonder, since cell phones are marketed by the same ad agencies using the same self-image come-ons that attracted teens to cigarettes – a sense of individuality and sociability, a desire to rebel, the need to bond with friends. [British Medical Journal Nov 4/00]

Totally hooked, Morgan now sends and receives up to 7,000 text messages a month.

AVOIDANCE THE ONLY DEFENCE After the Spanish Neuro Diagnostic Research Institute in Marbella discovered that a call lasting just two minutes can alter the natural electrical activity of a child’s brain for up to an hour afterwards, Spanish doctors now fear that disturbed brain activity in children will lead to zombie-like impaired learning ability, as well as psychiatric and behavioural problems.

Brain scans allowed Dr. Michael Klieeisen’s team to see what is happening to the brains of cell phone users. “We never expected to see this continuing activity in the brain,” he told the European press in new stories blacked out in the U.S. “We are worried that delicate balances that exist – such as the immunity to infection and disease – could be altered by interference with chemical balances in the brain.”

The study coincided with a survey showing 87% of 11- to 16-year-olds own cell phones, with 40% of them spending 15 minutes or more talking on them every day. A troubling 70% said they would not change the use of their phone even if advised to by the government.

A British government adviser on mobiles, Dr. Gerald Hyland, finds the results “extremely disturbing.” Parents who believe they are enhancing their children’s safety and social standing by sending them back to school with cellphones could be impairing their health and ability to learn, Dr. Hyland warns. “The results show that children’s brains are affected for long periods even after very short-term use. Their brain wave patterns are abnormal and stay like that for a long period. This could affect their mood and ability to learn in the classroom if they have been using a phone during break time, for instance.”

These same altered brain waves “could lead to things like a lack of concentration, memory loss, inability to learn and aggressive behaviour.”

He could be describing zombies!

“There really isn’t a safe amount of mobile phone use,” Dr. Hyland continues. We don’t know what lasting damage is being done by this exposure. If I were a parent I would now be extremely wary about allowing my children to use a mobile even for a very short period. My advice would be to avoid mobiles.” [Mirror Dec 26/01]

AN OCEAN APART It’s not like nobody knows how dangerous cell phones are. Perhaps because of earlier unpleasant experiences with vampires, European governments are intensely studying the effects of cell phones on otherwise normal humans. So far, their scientists have found everything from nervousness and headaches to brain tumors and even genetic damage resulting from cell phone radiation. [Independent Mar 30/08]

Led by Sir William Stewart, the famous British biochemist and president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science biomedical specialists, the Stewart Inquiry report on “Mobile Phones and Health” was released in April 2000. At a science conference in Glasgow, Sir William urged mobile phone makers to stop presenting their products as essential “back to school” items for children, whose easily penetrated skulls and longer lifetime use makes them particularly vulnerable to Radio-Frequency (RF) and microwave (MW) cell phone radiation. Sir William told the press he would not allow his grandchildren to use mobile phones. [Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine Sept /01]

In Sweden, where cell phones are being marketed to 5-year-olds, Olle Johansson, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm declares: “Parents should take their children away from that technology.” [Dialing Our Cells by William Thomas]

In an interview in the Berlin Morgenpost, Wolfram Koenig, head of the Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz – the federal authority for radiation protection in Germany – urged companies not to target children in their advertising campaigns.

Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, director general of the World Health Organisation, also told a major Norwegian newspaper that children should be discouraged from using mobile phones. The former Norwegian prime minister and popularizer of “sustainability” is also a licensed physician with a degree in public health. Making shorter calls does not help, Brundtland emphasized. [Microwave News Mar-Apr/02; Dagbladet Norge Mar 9/02]

France, Germany and the European Environment Agency also advise “minimal” handheld and hands-free cell phone use. But the Irish Doctors Environmental Association says flatly that young children should be stopped from using mobiles. The Irish point to zombie-like side-effects from cell phone radiation, including excessive clumsiness, fatigue, confusion, tingling and dizziness. [Independent Mar 30/08; Irish News Feb 9/05]

Back across the Atlantic, where one in three teenagers uses a cell phone, “There is no research being done in the United States at the present time,” Dr. Ghandi laments. “All of that research has been stopped because of industry.”

Dr. Ghandi says this violates both the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act and the mandate of the Federal Communication Commission, which regulates RF transmitters on behalf of the industry. His latest heavy-duty paper – Thermal Implications of the New Relaxed IEEE RF Safety Standard for Head Exposures to Cellular Telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz – compares the relaxed RF exposure standards set by an American advisory group called the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers to standards now followed by the European Union.

Gandhi helped establish those regulations. As he explains, in the United States “these days in the committee (that sets the standards), one co-chair is from Motorola and the other is from the Navy, the military-industrial establishment, and they are suddenly loosening their standards. I compared the three standards to show the new standards are out of line. Too loose.” [Uncensored (NZ) Nov 9/06]

HEAVY CASUALTIES SOON COME, MON? If tobacco companies dared employ the same sophisticated neural “programming” techniques to sell cigarettes to toddlers as cell phone manufacturers do by using the same marketing firms – they would face a lynch mob. But by inflicting devices recently denounced by a leading cancer researcher as injurious as smoking on the very young, mobile manufacturers are turning the public into compliant, brain dead zombies.

And maybe just plain dead, as well.

Just-released findings by award-winning cancer expert, PhD Vini Khurana predict that cell phones will kill far more people than either smoking or asbestos. Smoking continues to cull some five million people worldwide every year, while asbestos exposure in England continues to claim as many corpses as road accidents.

After carefully reviewing more than 100 clinical studies showing that using “hands free” and regular cell phones for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer, the very capable Khurana – who has received 14 awards while publishing more than three dozen scientific papers over the past 16 years – concludes that malignant brain tumours resulting from cell phone use constitute “a life-ending diagnosis” for hapless users who now find themselves in an “unchecked and dangerous situation.”

Professor Kjell Mild, of Orbero University, Sweden, who is a Government adviser and led the research, said that children should not be allowed to use mobile phones because their thinner skulls and developing nervous system made them particularly vulnerable. He and Professor Lawrie Challis, who led the MTHR research, want a revision of the emission standard for mobiles and other sources of radiation, which they describe as “inappropriate” and “not safe”. [London Telegraph Oct 9/07]

Professor Khurana has become a Big Kahuna in the war against cell phone zombification after placing his considerable reputation behind the most damning indictment of cell phones to date. He warns emphatically: “Unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive steps, the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now – by which time it may be much too late to medically intervene.” [Independent Mar 30/08]

PROCESS OF ELIMINATION It may already be too late.

A recent poll of 1,286 cellphone users has found that one in four cannot imagine life without their cell phone. The question remaining unasked is if they can imagine their lives continuing unimpaired with it.

Four in 10 people, particularly young adults, make cell phone calls to kill time as well as themselves, when traveling or waiting for someone they will invariably ignore. “We’ve got everything on my phone,” boasts Mark Madsen, a 24-year-old college student from Chattanooga, Tennessee. “I use it mostly for the phone, but I also play video games and use the MP3 player. I pretty much use it all the time.”

Like addicts everywhere, more than one in three cell phone subscribers say they are occasionally “stunned” by their user bills. Nevertheless, an increasing number of homes are speeding the zombification of their inhabitants by going completely wireless, with no landline at all. Public pay phones are also being removed, making it ever harder to avoid being owned by a brain-stunting cell phone.

This is good news for political leaders desiring a compliant populace for policies involving genocide, torture and concentration camps. It is also a boon to an illness industry feeding off human misery. On a New Zealand news show, Dr. George Carlo called marketing strategies aimed at children, “grotesque” after identifying as many as 50,000 new cases of brain and eye cancer attributable to cell phone use being diagnosed every year. (Mobile users who wear metal-frame glasses intensify the exposure to their eyes and heads). [IsraCast Technology News July 29/05]

Based on current epidemiological studies, that number will reach half a million cell phone cancer cases annually within the next two years.

WRONG ANSWERS “We have never had this kind of impending risk to society,” Dr. Carlo says. After heading a $28 million cell phone study from 1993 through 2001, his finding – “that RF causes genetic damage” was welcomed by his cell phone industry sponsors.

Jerry Phillips worked with Ross Adey on similar research funded by Motorola beginning in 1991. After Adey came to similar conclusions as Carlo, “Motorola was adamant that Adey never mention DNA damage and radiofrequency radiation in the same breath,” Phillips recounts. [WSW July 11/02; wirelessconsumers.org Dec03/01]

More than two decades ago, EMF researcher Alan Frey also wondered if headaches experienced by radio and radar operators – and now widely reported by cellphone users worldwide – were resulting from microwave-induced leakage of toxic molecules through the blood-brain barrier. “Headaches may only be the most obvious indicator of what is going on biologically,” Frey warned back in the mid-1980s.

Studying blood-brain barrier changes since the late 1980s, neurologist Leif Salford of Lund University in Sweden is the leading expert in this research. “With improved detection procedures and new tracers, one of his most recent studies found changes in the rat brain chemistry after only two minutes of cellphone-level exposures; the rats’ blood-brain barrier had failed, allowing proteins to enter the brain, and it is known that certain proteins which are normally present in blood, can cause nerve damage in the brain,” writes Aussie cellphone rsearcher and reporter Stewart Fist.

Professor Darius Leszcynski headed up the first two-year program looking at the effects of mobile phone radiation on human cells rather than those of rats at Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. He, too found that cell phone transmissions open the blood-brain barrier to potentially brain-damaging toxins in the blood. [WSW July 11/02]

“We think we are on to something very significant,” Professor Salford says. “It seems that molecules such as proteins and toxins can pass out of the blood, while the phone is switched on, and enter the brain. We need to bear in mind diseases such as MS and Alzheimer’s are linked to proteins being found in the brain.”

So, he added, is Parkinson’s Disease. [Electronics Australia Magazine Feb/00]

Alzheimer’s mental and memory impairment, and the jerky motions of Parkinson’s are telltale zombie symptoms.

PROTECT THE MACHINES “There is no proof that cellular telephones can be harmful,” insist already infected FCC zombies on their “Kidszone” website. Blithely ignoring hundreds of alarming clinical studies, the Federal Communications Commission offers reassuring “Cell Phone FAQs” before going on to advise:

“Some of the places that you should never use your mobile phone are inside hospitals and airplanes. When you make or receive calls, electromagnetic waves are sent through the air. Hospitals have a lot of electronic devices that monitor patient’s heartbeats and other things when they are getting surgery or when they are recovering from an illness. When electromagnetic waves try to go through them, the devices sometimes stop working.”

The FCC does not say what happens when a much more subtle and sensitive instrument called the human brain is exposed to “electromagnetic waves… sent through the air”. [fcc.gov]

LOST CONTACT Max Brooks, best-selling chronicler of the first Zombie World War, informs us that “nzúmbe” is a Kimbundu, West African word for a dead person’s soul. “So what makes this living human a zombie?” Brooks asks. “The answer is simple: brain damage.” [World War Z]

Few things damage brains as severely as chronic exposure to cell phone radiation. Leif Salford is concerned that spreading wireless technology is “drowning people in a sea of microwaves.” Speaking directly to the threatened zombification of the entire human population, Salford says brain neurons that would normally not become senile until people reached their 60’s, are doing so now when people reach their 30’s because of cell phone exposure. [RFSafe.com Nov26/03]

Children and teens who become hooked on cell phones face a lifetime of learning disabilities, hyperactivity, high risk from driving accidents, greatly increased acute and chronic asthma, hearing loss, vision loss, sleep disorders and cancers – as well as classic symptoms of zombification, including loss of social skills, inability to think and reason clearly, loss of contact with their surroundings.

Faced with hard-to-detect zombies in their own ranks, alarmed British military scientists have discovered that every cell phone transmission disrupts brain functioning responsible for memory and learning. “Overuse” can cause forgetfulness and sudden confusion, as well as loss of the ability to concentrate, calculate and coordinate. [India Tribune Sept 17/04]

A leading Lloyd’s of London underwriter refuses to insure phone manufacturers against the risk of subscribers developing cancer. The world’s most prestigious insurer also fears even more claims arising from zombified cell phone users who develop early onset Alzheimer’s. [Observer Mar11/99]

NO MORE KIDS? The coming cell phone cancer plague could terminate the cell phone zombie threat. But the cost to societies will be far greater than tobacco-related deaths. With more than 2 billion people – including at least 500 million children – using cell phones at present, the coming die-back of habitual cell phone users threatens the ability of nations to cope with bankrupt medical systems and overflowing hospitals and hospices. How will the trains – and everything else – run on time during socially dizzying disruptions caused by the sudden loss of key executives, city managers, government bureaucrats, tradespeople, professionals, as well as busy NGOs and activists to brain damage, electromagnetic sensitivity as acute as chemical sensitivities, and debilitating cancer?

RF/MW signals currently under discussion for inflicting on wireless classrooms throughout North America and the overdeveloped world will operate in the 2.4 GHz frequency range. This should do it. Because this cell-disrupting power density is two to three times higher than current cell phones. If schoolchildren survive this onslaught, plans are already underway to boost classroom radiation levels with “upgraded” technology emitting an even more lethal 5 GHz frequency range.[www.irf.univie.ac.at/emf]

Once turned into zombies and eventually culled by cell phones, these kids may be difficult to replace, because researchers at University of Szeged in Hungary have discovered that men carrying their cell phones on standby anywhere in their clothing throughout the day produce about a third less sperm than those who do not. Of the remaining sperm, high numbers were found to be swimming erratically – significantly reducing chances of fertilization. [BBC June 27/04]

Now put men made infertile by their cell phones together with fashionable beachgoing women who carry their cellphones in their bikini bottoms and the coming cell phone cull could become a crash. Especially if women are culled by bra-makers encouraging them to carry cell phones in their convenient, already cancer-prone cleavage.

Ironically, as more and more once-normal humans succumb to the seductive status and convenience conferred by cell phones, these extreme dangers become as self-perpetuating as the plague of brain-dead zombies already walking among us.

Vini Khurana urges everyone to stop using cell phones immediately. [Independent Mar 30/08]

LOW POWER INCREASES EFFECTS Cell phone manufacturers often point to the low power output of their devices. But Dr. Franch and other medical investigators have found that the negative health effects of cell phones worsen with low dosage. This “simply reflects the fact that biological systems operate in a non-linear manner,” writes Dr. Peter Franch in a co-authored landmark study, Effects Of 835mHz Exposure On Cell Structure And Function. “The higher frequency range” used in today’s digital cell phones “is also very close to the resonant frequency of human DNA, and as well as the resonant frequency of the human skull case.”

Oops.

“Mobile telephones are arguably the most radiative appliance we have ever invented apart from the microwave oven and people are putting them by their heads – arguably the most sensitive part of the body,” comments British biologist and mobile phone specialist Roger Coghill. “Human brains may absorb up to 40% of a cell phone’s RF energy, and as much as 60% of its microwave energy.”

Sensitive to subtle electromagnetic harmonies, human brains and bodies depend on electrical impulses to conduct complex life-processes – including the ability to read, recall and respond to these words. Much like a boxer taking repeated blows to the head, rapidly pulsing cell phones signal permanent brain damage.

Cell phone researcher Dr. Peter Franch says unequivocally that brain and other “cells are permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies.” This cellular damage, Franch notes, is maximized at low dosage, and “inherited unchanged, from generation to generation.”

“For the first time in history, we are holding a high-powered transmitter against the head,” agrees Dr. Ross Adey. “When you talk on your mobile phone, your voice is transmitted from the antenna as radio frequency radiation between 800 MHz and 1,990 MHz… at a range that’s right in the middle of microwave territory. [WSW July 11/02]

Whipping anything back-and-forth 800 or 1,990 million times per second is bound to cause breakage in the double-strand DNA of human cells.

Sure enough, in Dr. Franch’s clinical study, both normal human cells and malignant brain tumor both cells were permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies.

Dr. Henry Lai, a 20-year EMF researcher, and colleague Dr. N.P. Singh confirmed these conclusions by finding double-strand DNA breaks in test animals exposed for just two hours to pulsed, cell phone microwaves. Double-strand breaks do not repair themselves and can lead to mutation. An Adelaide Hospital study confirmed these findings after discovering that B-cell lymphomas doubled in mice within 18 months of one-hour daily exposure to power densities experienced by a cellphone user. B-cell lymphomas are implicated in 85% of all cancers.

Before having their research abruptly shut down by zombie officials, Dr. Lai’s experiments at the University of Washington placed rats in a pool of water where they learned to swim to a platform. After half the group was exposed to cellphone radiation, they became zombies and forgot the way to the platform. After it was removed, unexposed rats swam around bewildered, while the cellular-exposed group exhibited zero memory of it ever being there. [guardian.co.uk]

SAY WATT? Even though irrefutable medical evidence shows that, in addition to sparking a host of other maladies, cumulative brain damage from cell phones can lead to impairment severe enough to turn users into the walking dead, so far cell phone “safety codes” only regulate radiation capable of burning skin. “Basically, Health Canada claims if it can’t cook you, it can’t hurt you,” says Canadian EMF expert, Walter McGinnis. “It’s like saying cigarettes aren’t dangerous unless they burn you.”

Setting the standards for cell phone exposure in Britain, the National Radiological Protection Board’s recommended radiation limits are expressed in Specific Absorption Rates that measure radiation averaged over one gram of tissue. The 1999 NRPB recommended limit was 10 milliwatts. One year later, proposed European guidelines of two milliwatts were five-times more restrictive. But on March 9, 2000 the China Consumers Association issued a worried warning about cellphone radiation after their tests found that some cell phones radiate up to 1,550 milliwatts per square inch.

Cellphone manufactures insist that “many studies” show their miniature microwave ovens are safe. But when pressed by the Washington Post to back up their claim, the cellphone industry could cite no studies showing no adverse impact from cellular telephones on human tissues, nervous systems or organs. As Dr. George Carlo confirmed, “The industry had come out and said that there were thousands of studies that proved that wireless phones are safe, and the fact was that there were no studies that were directly relevant.”

Among more than 15,000 scientific reports on the cell phone hazards, at least 66 epidemiological studies show that electromagnetic radiation increases brain tumors in human populations. [“Cell Phone Convenience or 21st Century Plague?” by Dr. Nick Begich and James Roderick earthpulse.com]

THE CELL PHONE “SHIELD” SCAM Can shooting yourself in the head be “safe”? Cellphone “shields” do not block microwaves, or change their harmful frequencies. If they did, cell phones could not communicate.

The only way to ensure complete protection against being turned into a zombie by cell phones is to avoid using them except in emergencies when no other voice communication is available – at the max, experts suggest, one or two minutes per month.

But cell phone manufacturers and sales rep zombies are working tirelessly to infect others by situating cell phone relay transmitters in town centers, schools and shopping centers. Remote natural settings especially attract towers festooned with microwave transmitters. Be wary! Faced with growing public opposition and some recent notable victories that have seen cell phone towers removed, their rote-reciting advocates are once again advancing their contaminating emissions by stealth – hiding cell phone relays in trees, eaves and even church steeples. Private landowners are also paid annual fees to site unassailable cell phone transmitters on their property capable of irradiating entire neighborhoods.

Incredibly shrinking mobile phones are being made small enough to fit inside a cigarette case by putting their antenna inside the phone. But this sharply reduces reception, which in turn is causing base stations to boost their RF and microwave power outputs back to size-challenged cell phones. [New York Times Mar 10/03]

SAFETY TIP: If a visitor’s cell phone picks up a strong signal where you live, find the offending tower and remove it. Or move.

Before you become a zombie, too.

app marketing buy app reviews

0 notes

zuranimukherjeenudexn · 7 years

Text

ATTACK OF THE CELL PHONE ZOMBIES

New Post has been published on http://app2chart.com/attack-of-the-cell-phone-zombies/

ATTACK OF THE CELL PHONE ZOMBIES

“Zombies. man. They creep me out.” -Dennis Hopper in the Land Of The Dead.

Book Excerpt:

By William Thomas

They are everywhere.

And they are winning.

CELL PHONE CARNAGE Still, innocent bystanders and drivers can be at grave risk from deranged zombies talking on their cell phones while operating heavy fast-moving vehicles.

That’s comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk exclaims Dr. Chris Runball, chairman of the B.C. Medical Association’s emergency medical services committee.

God have mercy on us all. If one in a hundred infants are not actually autistic but hard-to-differentiate zombies – we may find ourselves overwhelmed within another generation.

“We’re pretty bullish on increased usage by teenagers,” exudes Adam Guy, a senior analyst at the Strategist Group. “Usage penetration is exploding.”

No one told him to worry about its emanations.

Totally hooked, Morgan now sends and receives up to 7,000 text messages a month.

These same altered brain waves “could lead to things like a lack of concentration, memory loss, inability to learn and aggressive behaviour.”

He could be describing zombies!

And maybe just plain dead, as well.

PROCESS OF ELIMINATION It may already be too late.

Based on current epidemiological studies, that number will reach half a million cell phone cancer cases annually within the next two years.

So, he added, is Parkinson’s Disease. [Electronics Australia Magazine Feb/00]

Alzheimer’s mental and memory impairment, and the jerky motions of Parkinson’s are telltale zombie symptoms.

The FCC does not say what happens when a much more subtle and sensitive instrument called the human brain is exposed to “electromagnetic waves… sent through the air”. [fcc.gov]

Vini Khurana urges everyone to stop using cell phones immediately. [Independent Mar 30/08]

Oops.

Whipping anything back-and-forth 800 or 1,990 million times per second is bound to cause breakage in the double-strand DNA of human cells.

Sure enough, in Dr. Franch’s clinical study, both normal human cells and malignant brain tumor both cells were permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies.

SAFETY TIP: If a visitor’s cell phone picks up a strong signal where you live, find the offending tower and remove it. Or move.

Before you become a zombie, too.

app marketing buy app reviews

0 notes