Text
The Truth About BUMP STOCKS - Is It a Machine Gun? (Slo-Mo Analysis)
youtube
0 notes
Text
The Supreme Court will have blood on their hands for the next mass murder with a bump stock. #supremecourt #bumpstocks
Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks' ban is unlawful
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-gun-bump-stocks-ban-unlawful-rcna154651
1 note
·
View note
Text
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
STOP ACTING LIKE YOU'RE SO UNIMPORTANT AND YOU JUST DON'T CARE. YOU'RE LYING!
we're all citizens of YE OLDE REPUBLICk
We're BASICALLY NOBILITY.
BRING ME MY POLICE CARRIAGE. I AM EMBARKING FOTHWITH TO THE HIGHEST COURTS OF THE LAND. with a bumpstock and a A-R 15
0 notes
Text
Supreme Court IS CORRUPT!: The Bumpstock Decision | Christopher Titus Po...
youtube
0 notes
Text
Bumpstocks
It’s not the bump stock that destroyed people it was the people using them that was the problem.

0 notes
Text
Gubermint news outlet and Gubermint representative outright lie to people about Bumpstocks !!!
https://youtu.be/gSDfuQ56PQU?si=gVPDkE13hV3UkLaj
0 notes
Text
La Corte Suprema emite fallo que convierte en ilegal la prohibición federal a los llamados bump stocks, que permiten mayor rapidez de disparo a los ri...
0 notes
Text
CJ court watch - the bumpstock case
SCt decided Garland v. Cargill, 602 U. S. __ (2024) today. The decision was 6-3 and broke along familiar ideological lines.
The issue was the definition of machine gun and whether ATF could redefine semiautomatic rifles to be machine guns on its own initiative.
Congress has long restricted access to “‘machinegun[s],’” a category of firearms defined by the ability to “shoot, automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger.” 26 U. S. C. §5845(b); see also 18 U. S. C. §922(o). Semiautomatic firearms, which require shooters to reengage the trigger for every shot, are not machineguns. This case asks whether a bump stock—an accessory for a semiautomatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger (and therefore achieve a high rate of fire)—converts the rifle into a “machinegun.” We hold that it does not and therefore affirm.*** For many years, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) took the position that semiautomatic rifles equipped with bump stocks were not machineguns under the statute. On more than 10 separate occasions over several administrations, ATF consistently concluded that rifles equipped with bump stocks cannot “automatically” fire more than one shot “by a single function of the trigger.”*** ATF abruptly reversed course in response to a mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada. In October 2017, a gunman fired on a crowd attending an outdoor music festival in Las Vegas, killing 58 people and wounding over 500 more. The gunman equipped his weapons with bump stocks, which allowed him to fire hundreds of rounds in a matter of minutes.*** ATF’s aboutface drew criticism from some observers, including those who agreed that bump stocks should be banned. Senator Dianne Feinstein, for example, warned that ATF lacked statutory authority to prohibit bump stocks, explaining that the proposed regulation “‘hinge[d] on a dubious analysis’” and that the “‘gun lobby and manufacturers [would] have a field day with [ATF’s] reasoning’” in court. Statement on Regulation To Ban Bump Stocks (Mar. 23, 2018). She asserted that “‘legislation is the only way to ban bump stocks.’” Ibid. ATF issued its final Rule in 2018. 83 Fed. Reg. 66514***
There was basically no way of getting around Congress's definition that "machine gun" means a single trigger action results in more than one round discharged. Bump stocks don't change the weapon or the firing mechanism, they just make it easier/faster to operate the trigger.
0 notes
Video
youtube
Bumpstock Case Update w/ Michael Cargill | Supreme Court Oral Arguments!
0 notes
Text
1 note
·
View note
Text
Did ATF Harass Michael Cargill Over Bumpstock Case?
youtube
0 notes
Photo
1st/2nd/5th Amendment Brief: National Summary BLUF: Summary of legal actions and developments effecting Constitutional Rights. In Yolo County, CA county officials voted unanimously to amendment a firearms regulation on gun storage to allow it to extend to vehicles. The amendment will prohibit the storage of firearms in unattended vehicles unless in a locked container or tethered to the vehicle when the operator is not in sight of the vehicle. It also prohibits the storage of firearms in vehicles overnight. For the 3rd time this year, the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear cases regarding the ATF's administrative ban on bumpstocks. On this 3rd attempt to bring the case to SCOTUS, the lawsuit claimed that the ATF's rule violates the 5th Amendment in that it required citizens, who possessed the bump stocks at the time of the rule change, to destroy the accessory to avoid be charged with a felony. The requirement does not compensate citizens for their forced destruction and therefore violates the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment (according to the complaint). A case regarding free speech and the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment has been appealed in the Virginia Supreme Court after a lower court denied a dismissal. The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) has asked the states' highest court to reinstate a high school teacher who was fired for refusing to use a transgender student’s preferred pronouns. The teacher complied by referring to the student’s new chosen name but when he was compelled by the schools superintendent to use preferred and evolving pronouns, the teacher refused and was consequentially fired. A Maryland man has filed a lawsuit against Baltimore after a claim that the city violated his 1st Amendment rights to display a hand carried poster. The city of Baltimore requires individuals who wish to display a sign on public sidewalks to first obtain a "Minor Privilege and Sign Permit." The permit requires approval Right of Way Services Division, the Department of Transportation, and the Board of Estimates, and other city departme...(CLASSIFIED, full brief reserved for paid subscribers at www.graymanbriefing.com)
0 notes
Text
During the Las Vegas shooting, Stephen Paddock supposedly expent 3000+ rounds of ammunition over the course of ten minutes from 27 AR-15's with bumpstocks despite the facts that it would have required him to drop a gun after each 30 round magazine was empty, even though videos from survivors show that it was a nonstop stream of ammunition with a firing rate much higher than a bumpstock is capable of producing from multiple locations that appear to be M240 LMG's. More interesting is the fact that after the FBI took over the investigation, his house somehow burned down with all of the evidence, and photos of the hotel room he shot from only show 50 spent shells. Years later we still have no motivation, and there was strangely no follow up on the biggest mass shooting in US history. Most confusing is that the day after his brother had numerous press interviews where he claimed it made no sense, he was arrested for possessing several hundred terabytes of child porn on a 20 year old computer running Windows 95, at least according to the photos taken by the FBI.
0 notes
Text
268 notes
·
View notes