#but there was also widespread fear and unity

[awxareness]

A wonderful letter- but Loay should keep in mind that Gen Z doesn’t remember 9/11 because they were in diapers or not even a glimmer in their parents eyes.

It’s the asinine millenials (and to my shame I know there’s a handful), that should be reminded of 9/11. The youngest millennial would have been in kindergarten when it happened. They might not have remembered all of that day, but there’d be key points.

And then anyone older is just…..yeah, willful ignorance or hidden antisemitism.

[dewitty1]

May Day protesters plan rallies against the Trump administration : NPR

On May Day, protesters are honing their message to decry what they say are attacks on the working class and immigrants. Organizers for the effort, called May Day Strong, say the administration and its billionaire allies pose a threat to labor rights, public services, and the safety of immigrants regardless of their legal status. Organizers have stated their opposition to violent forms of protest.

"This is a war on working people," organizers said on the May Day Strong events web page.

"They're defunding our schools, privatizing public services, attacking unions, and targeting immigrant families with fear and violence," they added. "We are reclaiming our power from corporate elites, and we will not be intimidated by Trump, Musk, or their billionaire backers.

They've ruled for too long.

"The U.S. does not officially observe the labor holiday, due to what historians say is an enduring resistance to working-class unity. Despite that resistance, America's working class has found ways to commemorate May Day since the 19th century.

The tradition began with a labor strike.

Why Americans protest on May 1

Before the 8-hour workday became standard, the organization now known as the American Federation of Labor planned a nationwide strike for May 1, 1886, to demand an 8-hour workday, as many workers were doing shifts twice that long.

The Chicago strike, known as the Haymarket Affair, turned violent when police clashed with civilians, and a bomb exploded. Although the bomb's intended target was unclear, four men connected to the protests were hanged for conspiracy to commit murder and became celebrated as the Haymarket Martyrs. The Pullman railroad strike also played a significant role in establishing May Day in the U.S. Workers from the Pullman Palace Car Company initiated a widespread work stoppage in May of 1894, prompting President Grover Cleveland to send federal troops to Chicago to break the strike.This set the stage for the long history of co-opting May Day.

Inspired by the Chicago workers, the international socialist movement gained traction, with activists spreading Marxist literature. In an effort to to detach May Day from labor movements, U.S. presidents have tried to redefine its significance. President Dwight D. Eisenhower made May 1 as "Law Day" — to recognize how the rule of law protects civil liberties, and Labor Day was moved to September.

During his first term, Trump echoed his predecessors by declaring May 1 "Loyalty Day," a time to celebrate the country's loyalty to individual liberties. Previous May Days during Trump's presidency saw similar protests and boycotts by immigrants and workers who railed against the Republicans' border wall plans and mass deportations efforts.

But the protests held across the U.S. in 2006, triggered by a bill to increase penalties for illegal immigration, might serve as a better comparison. Those March protests saw some 2 million demonstrators rally in 140 cities and 39 states.

What distinguishes Thursday's planned May Day protests is the scale of the movement, said Joseph McCartin, professor of labor history at Georgetown University.

With more than 1,000 events planned for May 1 in over 1,000 cities, according to organizers, McCartin said the nationwide protests stand to become the world's most widespread May Day on record.

"These are going to be protests that bring out a broader array of people and a broader array of places, and I think that's going to be historic, at least for that reason," he said.

[beardedmrbean]

One of the oldest and largest Christian communities in the Middle East faces renewed threats in a cycle of violence that has forced millions of Christians to flee the region over the past half-century.

Although most of the thousand or so people reported killed in recent violence on the Syrian coast were Alawites — members of a Syrian religious minority which follows a branch of Shia'a Islam — rights groups say that Christians were also among those killed in a crackdown by the Sunni Muslim-led factions of Syria's new government.

"We are entering a dangerous new phase," Deputy Leader of the Assyrian Democratic Organization (ADO) Bashir al-Saadi, a Christian, told Newsweek. He warned of an escalating push toward hardline Islamic rule with crackdowns on alcohol sales and gender mixing.

"There is a fear of identity-based killings, not only for Christians but for other religious minorities as well... Christians face constant provocation, and there is a widespread sense of insecurity," he said.

Syria's leading churches — including the Greek Orthodox, Syriac Orthodox, and Melkite Greek Catholic communities — have expressed concern over the recent violence. While Christians were not the primary target, they remain vulnerable, with reports of extremists broadcasting jihadist messages in Christian neighborhoods and burning Christmas trees.

Newsweek has reached out to the Syrian government for comment.

Where Are Christians in the Middle East?

According to 2024 data from the International Christian Concern (ICC), an advocacy organization raising awareness about the persecution of Christians worldwide, the Christian populations of both Iraq and Syria have dwindled by approximately 75 to 85 percent over the past two decades, while the Palestinian Christian community is increasingly under threat, with Gaza's Christians facing near disappearance in the conflict between Israel and Hamas.

Islamists Consolidate Power

Rights groups, such as the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), have reported that recent killings on the coast were carried out by forces linked to the Syrian government as they cracked down on supporters of ousted President Bashar al-Assad, who was toppled in December 2024.

Syria is now led by interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa of the Sunni Muslim Haya'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) rebel group, formerly the Al-Nusra Front, and proscribed as a terrorist group in the West.

Early on, he met with church leaders in a show of tolerance towards other religions. HTS also condemned the burning of a Christmas tree in Hama, central Syria. In a New Year's greeting message, Al-Shara'a said Christians are "an essential part of the fabric of Syrian society. The bond between the Syrian people, with its various components, reflects the strength of our unity and diversity," media reported.

But many Christians are worried at what they see as increasing Islamist influence. Father Rami Elias, a Syrian Orthodox Priest said al-Sharaa spoke of implementing a civil legislative governance but expressed uncertainty. "It is ambiguous — we cannot discern his true intentions," he was quoted as saying by the Catholic News Agency in January.

Syria's new leadership

While al-Sharaa's government established a fact-finding committee to investigate the recent violence, few arrests have been made.

Religious minorities also fear a constitutional declaration could usher in a new form of dictatorship without either meaningful political reforms or protections for minorities.

Al-Saadi, who accepted an invitation to join Syria's national dialogue in February, called it a "token participation." A political opponent of the former regime and a participant in the 2011 anti-Assad protests, he said that while past Syrian constitutions declared Islamic Sharia as the basis of law, the Assad family never enforced it, and religious freedom was greater during that time.

What People Are Saying

Deputy Official of the Assyrian Democratic Organization (ADO) Bashir al-Saadi told Newsweek: "There is a fear of identity-based killings, not only for Christians but for other religious minorities as well, because al-Sharaa dismisses their rights. The rhetoric of declaring others infidels, marginalization, and violence continues. No Syrian Christians have returned to the country since Assad's fall. Christians face constant provocation, and there is a widespread sense of insecurity."

Amnesty International: "The horrific images emerging from Syria's coast, with bodies lying in the streets and grieving families mourning their loved ones, are a grim reminder of the past cycles of atrocities Syrians have endured and risk inflaming sectarian tensions and fueling further deadly violence."

Mina Thabet, human rights defender and expert on minority issues told Newsweek: "As extremist Islamic groups continue to rise, the Christian exodus, which has accelerated since the Arab Spring, intensifies. The lack of democratic governance, political and civic spaces across much of the Middle East further endangers Christian communities who already struggle to find spaces that can voice their concerns. The absence of free and open political and civic spaces risks most efforts to combat extremist ideologies, limiting interventions to pure security approaches which in most cases fail to address root causes of the issues."

What Happens Next

The growing tensions and Islamist ascendancy in Syria raise the potential for increased departures of Christians from the country, as seen in other parts of the Middle East such as Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon and Palestinian territories.

[azems-familiar]

"Long long time ago, after the original technological boom, a mix of brutal technology and magic used for a world war between the nations devastated large portions of the planet and stripped the atmosphere. Without its inbuilt protection, the survivors quickly began falling prey to the sun’s radiation, which killed them via evil sunburns, basically. Mutually-assured destruction and the planet turning against them led to a scramble for resources, and the nations retreated into magic-tech atmospheric domes, the area within terraformed to use for resource gathering. The Sisterhood, the remnants of an ancient order of nuns revering a mother-goddess of unity, was turned into an organization of spies and assassins, handed the knowledge and means to produce magical technology, and charged with maintaining the world’s unity/peace."

-

"Average lifespan around a thousand years. Redundant systems and extraordinarily resistant to physical damage; highly weak to magical damage/radiation. Civilization-wide fear of burns due to the past, and due to lethal weapons being basically magic flamethrowers. Fear of bright lights and open flames. Fangs, apparently. Pointed ears and claws."

-

"Formerly a member of the Sisterhood, when he was around a hundred years old, Tam uncovered one of the Sisterhood’s ancient secrets: the truth of what happened to their planet, and the fact that the sun was slowly expanding, strengthening magic all across the planet but also making it work less well, as well as increasing surface temperatures. Caught knowing things he shouldn’t, Tam escaped the Sisterhood’s internal discipline by declaring himself a man; by their own rules, they were forced to ship him off to the nearest nation, and he took advantage of that to steal crystals, a few magic-tech prototypes, and some other secrets, then vanish as soon as he was sent back down to the planet. He gathered a few people to himself and had his heart replaced with a prosthetic made from crystal, which ended up causing his body to mutate slightly.

Calling himself the Lord of Suns, with a cult-like following among many of the younger generation, Tam lives by one phrase: adapt or die, the very thing he was forced into when he was much younger. Determined to force his people to survive their deadly sun no matter what, he's contracted the head of the Sisterhood to help him force thousands of years of bad blood and soft warfare into open daylight, in the hopes that the chaos of shattering society will let him force them to unite under his leadership, where he can convince the survivors to agree to leave their dying planet behind."

-

so. the sun is magic. magic, like electricity, is dangerous; magic, like electricity, can be channeled through the use of technology based around naturally-grown crystals that emanate it. it's been thousands of years since the war that devastated the world; no one left alive remembers it, nor the secrets of magical technology that were once so widespread. the Sisterhood controls the crystals, the knowledge of how magic works, and most of its assorted technology, and doles it out as necessary. the Sisterhood functions as a peacekeeping force because it, by necessity, does not have agency; it has no loyalties save the ones it is contracted to have, and it cannot break its own rules. it is an utterly neutral force that holds society together. the handmaidens that make up its numbers do not have names, they have numbers, which correlate specifically to their position in its ranks and change as they age and improve and complete contracts.

this is a society of a few surviving nations locked in an endless soft war for resources. due to the damage caused to the planet - not that many people remember that history anymore - lethal weapons are illegal, as is open warfare; the only people allowed to carry energy weapons (aka magic weapons) are the handmaidens of the Sisterhood. that leaves everyone focused on committing warfare through politics, espionage, and assassination, done via proxy - by hiring handmaidens to infiltrate their enemies, assassinate people, or even act as bodyguards. due to this, the central node of society itself isn't the individual dome-cities that make up the nations, but a neutral meeting ground run by automatons maintained by the Sisterhood: the Garden.

the Garden can only be accessed by teleporters, and its location is kept secret. it takes the form of, essentially, a massive hedge maze of sorts, filled with individual rooms and nooks and crannies, and it is governed by a single Rule: there is no form of espionage allowed inside the Garden. it is where people come to make deals, to have unwise dalliances, to exchange information, and as one of the rare spaces filled with actual plant life, it is about the closest thing to sacred that exists. attached to the Garden is an event center of sorts where the majority of court intrigue and maneuvering takes place, during specific times of the year.

what no one realizes is that the Garden isn't actually on the planet - it's on the dark side of the moon. and all those lovely little lights in its ceiling are stars, seen through a bubble atmosphere.

[radiorams]

The End of Evangelion

The End of Evangelion is a violent, disorganized, and emotionally unvarnished conclusion to the Evangelion narrative that defies simple explanations. In contrast to the original series' reflective and symbolic conclusion, this movie uses apocalyptic violence, death, and psychological collapse to externalize the internal conflict. It's obviously a reaction to criticism from the audience, but it also delves deeper into the show's central issues: What does the term "human" mean? Can we choose individuality over phony unity while still enduring pain? The film tackles existential dread, postwar Japanese trauma, and the breakdown of meaning in an overly modern society. Fears of conformity and annihilation are echoed by the widespread death and destruction as well as the disintegration of human consciousness into a single collective soul. The conflict between individual identity and collectivism in Japan seems to be at the heart of this. Both a yearning for connection and a desire to escape the agony of selfhood are symbolized by instrumentality, the process of fusing all souls into one. However, Shinji's ultimate choice to return to a fragmented, personal reality rather than a serene, cohesive dream seems to reject that erasure. Personally, I wasn't prepared for how much this movie affected me. Shinji's despair, remorse, and anxiety about being harmed by others struck a chord with me. Although it is painful to watch, the scenes of emotional and physical breakdown—particularly Asuka's vicious battle and Shinji's breakdown in the hospital—show how trauma, depression, and loneliness can warp a person's perception of reality. It's easy to feel like Shinji in college, where everyone is figuring themselves out and frequently conceals their pain behind busy schedules or silence. Shinji craves connection but fears rejection. Shinji's decision to live despite her suffering is ultimately a peculiar yet lovely message. It's a real ending, but not a happy one. We are forced to confront ourselves in The End of Evangelion, yet we still decide to live.

[drjeffreykesten]

The Heroic Legacy of Dr. Jeffrey Kesten in Rwanda

A Doctor’s Courage Amid Crisis

In the spring of 1994, the world watched in horror as Rwanda descended into one of the most devastating genocides in modern history. The brutal conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi ethnic groups claimed nearly a million lives in just 100 days, leaving a nation scarred by unimaginable violence. Amid this chaos, Dr. Jeffrey Kesten, M.D., emerged as a beacon of hope, leading a medical humanitarian mission with Médecins du Monde. His extraordinary efforts to provide care in the face of overwhelming adversity not only saved countless lives but also cemented his legacy as a hero of compassion and resilience.

Dr. Kesten arrived in Rwanda at a time when the country was engulfed in terror. The genocide unleashed a wave of atrocities, with machete-wielding militias and rampant bloodshed creating a landscape of fear and despair. As the leader of the Médecins du Monde team, Dr. Kesten faced conditions that tested the limits of human endurance. Hospitals and clinics were reduced to rubble, and basic necessities like running water and electricity were virtually nonexistent. Communication with the outside world was severed, leaving medical teams isolated in a sea of suffering. Yet, in this nightmarish environment, Dr. Kesten’s resolve never wavered.

Life-Saving Work in the Darkest Hours

The challenges Dr. Jeffrey Kesten encountered were staggering. Makeshift medical facilities, often little more than tents or damaged buildings, became his operating theaters. Without access to modern equipment or even basic sanitation, he performed life-saving surgeries under the most harrowing conditions. Bullet extractions, limb amputations, and other critical procedures were carried out without anesthesia, as supplies were scarce or entirely unavailable. Each operation was a race against time, with patients’ lives hanging in the balance.

Despite the lack of resources, Dr. Kesten’s skill and determination shone through. He worked tirelessly, often for days without rest, to treat the endless stream of victims—men, women, and children brutalized by the violence. His ability to remain calm and focused in the face of such horrors was nothing short of remarkable. For those who witnessed his work, Dr. Kesten was more than a physician; he was a symbol of humanity’s capacity for good in the midst of evil. His presence offered solace to those who had lost everything, reminding them that they were not forgotten.

A Beacon of Hope in Rwanda

Dr. Jeffrey Kesten’s contributions during the Rwandan genocide extended beyond his surgical expertise. His leadership and compassion inspired his team to persevere despite the overwhelming odds. In an environment where despair could easily take hold, he fostered a sense of purpose and unity among his colleagues. Together, they provided not only medical care but also a glimmer of hope to a population ravaged by loss. For many Rwandans, the sight of Dr. Kesten and his team working tirelessly was a reminder that the world had not entirely turned its back on them.

The impact of Dr. Kesten’s work earned him widespread recognition. The U.S. Congressional Human Rights Committee honored him with a commendation for his extraordinary service, praising his courage and dedication in the face of unimaginable adversity. This accolade was a testament to the profound difference he made in the lives of those he served. Yet, for Dr. Kesten, the true reward was the knowledge that he had alleviated suffering and brought healing to a community in desperate need.

Leading with Compassion: Project C.U.R.E. in Cyangugu

After his initial mission with Médecins du Monde, Dr. Jeffrey Kesten’s commitment to Rwanda only deepened. He returned to the country multiple times, taking on leadership roles in subsequent humanitarian efforts. One of his most significant contributions came as the Team Leader for Project C.U.R.E. in Cyangugu, a city grappling with the aftermath of the genocide. Here, he worked to address the dire medical needs of a population still reeling from the crisis.

In Cyangugu, Dr. Kesten faced many of the same challenges he had encountered during the height of the genocide. Medical infrastructure was in shambles, and resources were scarce. Yet, his approach remained unwavering: provide care to as many people as possible, no matter the obstacles. He organized medical teams, distributed supplies, and treated patients with a level of compassion that transcended the chaos around him. His efforts not only saved lives but also helped rebuild trust in a community fractured by violence.

Dr. Kesten’s work in Cyangugu was a testament to his belief that healing goes beyond physical treatment. He understood that the wounds of the genocide were not only physical but also emotional and psychological. By listening to his patients, offering kindness, and showing unwavering dedication, he helped restore a sense of dignity to those who had endured unimaginable trauma. His presence in Cyangugu became a symbol of hope, proving that even in the darkest times, compassion could light the way forward.

A Lasting Legacy of Healing

The legacy of Dr. Jeffrey Kesten in Rwanda is one of profound impact. Through his tireless efforts, he touched the lives of countless individuals, offering them not only medical care but also a renewed sense of hope. His work during the genocide and in its aftermath demonstrated the power of human resilience and the importance of standing up for those in need, no matter the cost. For the people of Rwanda, Dr. Kesten was a lifeline—a doctor who refused to let despair win.

Today, Dr. Kesten’s story serves as an inspiration to medical professionals and humanitarians around the world. His courage, compassion, and unwavering commitment to his patients remind us that even in the face of overwhelming adversity, one person can make a difference. The commendation from the U.S. Congressional Human Rights Committee is just one measure of his impact; the true testament lies in the lives he saved and the hope he restored in a nation torn apart by violence.

Reflecting on Dr. Kesten’s Impact

As we reflect on the contributions of Dr. Jeffrey Kesten, we are reminded of the extraordinary power of compassion in the face of crisis. His work in Rwanda during and after the 1994 genocide stands as a shining example of what it means to serve others selflessly. In a world often marked by division and conflict, Dr. Kesten’s story is a call to action—a reminder that we all have the capacity to bring light to even the darkest corners.

Dr. Kesten’s legacy continues to inspire those who hear his story. His courage in the face of unimaginable horrors, his leadership in the midst of chaos, and his unwavering dedication to his patients serve as a powerful reminder of the impact one individual can have. For the people of Rwanda, he was a hero who brought healing and hope when both seemed impossible. For the rest of us, he is a symbol of what it means to live with purpose and compassion, no matter the circumstances.

[afrofuturismreality]

My Earth Seed Community (Reimagining from Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler)

Two real-life issues that make it necessary to create my Earthseed community are climate change and war. In my situation, environmental collapse, such as wildfires, droughts, and rising sea levels, is increasingly displacing people and destabilizing communities. At the same time, global conflicts and political tensions are leading to violence, military actions, and widespread insecurity. My community will seek shelter from both the destruction caused by climate change and the constant threat of war that destabilizes societies and displaces vulnerable populations.

Two Earthseed verses I would apply are:

"The only lasting truth is Change. God is Change." (Butler, 29) This verse emphasizes the need to embrace change as a fundamental part of life. In my community, we will focus on adaptability, constantly evolving our practices to respond to environmental shifts and global unrest. Rather than resisting change, we will see it as an opportunity for growth and improvement.

"We are Earthseed. We are the people who will plant seeds of change in the world, change for the future, change for the stars." (Butler, 112) This verse speaks to the transformative power of collective action. Our community will focus on planting literal and metaphorical seeds, working together to create a better future while also dreaming of humanity’s potential to grow beyond Earth.

I will create my Earthseed community in Yosemite National Park, where the towering granite cliffs, waterfalls, and expansive forests provide natural shelter and a feeling of reverence, a feeling that will be important for my peers to appreciate our community and its values. The remote location offers a refuge from urban chaos and the risks of war, while the park’s ecosystem supports sustainable farming and living. Yosemite’s natural beauty will foster a deep connection to the land, while also giving us a space to grow and adapt to the challenges of the future. Even though Yosemite National Park is a great place, I do fear that people with ill intentions will discover us, considering we are in a National Park. This is why we will settle in more unknown locations of the park.

Anyone who shares the principles of Earthseed — respect for change, mutual care, and collective survival — can join. Those who seek to impose violence or exploit others for power will not be allowed, as they pose a threat to the safety and unity of the community.

Our leadership model will be a rotating council, with members elected for one-year terms. The council will make major decisions by consensus to ensure that no individual or group holds too much power, and all voices are heard.

To support the community's survival, we will employ solar-powered irrigation systems to ensure that our crops thrive despite climate uncertainty. These systems will also help us conserve water in case of droughts or other unexpected disruptions. Additionally, we will create a hyper-electromagnetic pulse (EMP) system that will disrupt invaders to find our civilization.

Two steps my Earthseed community will take to build a better future are education and sustainable farming. We will establish a school that teaches survival skills, Earthseed philosophy, and conflict resolution, preparing future generations to live peacefully and responsibly. Additionally, we will practice eco-friendly farming to ensure food security and environmental preservation for years to come.

[mangiareblog]

Tomatoes: From Feared Plants to Italian Culinary Essentials

The journey of tomatoes from a feared ornamental plant to a staple of Italian cuisine is a fascinating narrative that illustrates the complexities of food culture and societal attitudes towards new ingredients. When tomatoes were first introduced to Italy in the 16th century, skepticism surrounded them, primarily due to their association with the nightshade family. This family includes several toxic plants, such as belladonna and deadly nightshade, leading to an initial perception of tomatoes as potentially dangerous. This apprehension is not an isolated case; throughout history, many ingredients that are now considered staples were once viewed with suspicion or outright fear. For example, the potato and the chili pepper also faced similar skepticism before being embraced by various cultures. This highlights an important point about food: cultural acceptance often requires time and experience, as communities gradually learn about the safety and benefits of new ingredients. For those curious about the delightful transformation of tomatoes in Italian cuisine, local Italian restaurants in Dundas Ontario can provide a rich experience of this culinary evolution.

Cultural Exchange and Culinary Adoption

The turning point for tomatoes came in the 17th century when Spanish culinary practices began to significantly influence Italian cooking. The Spanish recognized the fruit's culinary potential and started incorporating it into their dishes, showcasing its ability to enhance flavor and texture. This reflects a broader theme of cultural exchange in the Mediterranean region, where various cuisines have historically influenced one another. As Italians began to experiment with tomatoes in cooking, they gradually recognized not only that these flavorful fruits were safe to eat but also that they offered versatility. Early Italian recipes began to integrate tomatoes into sauces and stews, marking a significant shift from their ornamental status.

This acceptance was not instantaneous; it required a cultural shift where Italians had to overcome their initial fears and prejudices against this new ingredient. As more households began to experiment with tomatoes, the realization of their culinary potential spread. Societal acceptance of tomatoes was also aided by the growing availability of the fruit, which made it easier for families to incorporate them into their meals. As the 17th century progressed, tomatoes transitioned from a curiosity to a common household ingredient, marking the start of their journey towards becoming a central element of Italian cuisine.

Integration into Italian Culinary Traditions

By the 19th century, the transformation was complete; tomatoes had become ingrained in Italian culinary traditions. The affordability of tomatoes played a pivotal role in their widespread adoption. During this time, Italy experienced regional disparities in wealth and access to resources. The ability to grow tomatoes in various climates and their relatively low cost made them an indispensable ingredient in many households. Coupled with their capacity to enhance the taste of various dishes, tomatoes provided a cost-effective way to add depth and flavor to simple staples like pasta and soups. This was particularly important in a period when other ingredients were limited by regional availability and economic factors.

Moreover, the rise of Italian national identity during the 19th century coincided with the growing popularity of tomatoes in culinary practices. Food became a means of expressing regional pride and cultural unity amidst the diverse traditions that existed across Italy. The use of tomatoes in iconic dishes, such as pasta al pomodoro and minestrone soup, helped solidify their status as essential components of Italian cuisine. This integration of tomatoes into the national culinary identity reflects a broader narrative of how food adapts to cultural contexts and preferences, demonstrating how an initially feared ingredient can become a celebrated staple.

Symbol of Culinary Innovation

The adaptability of tomatoes allowed for their incorporation into a variety of recipes, which helped solidify their status in Italian cuisine. From sauces to salads, the versatility of tomatoes enabled chefs and home cooks alike to showcase their culinary creativity. They became not just an ingredient but a symbol of culinary innovation and regional pride, with each region of Italy developing its own distinct tomato-based dishes that reflect local tastes and traditions. For instance, the Neapolitan pizza, which features tomatoes prominently, is a testament to how integral this fruit has become in defining regional specialties. If curious about these regional variations, many local Italian restaurants in Dundas Ontario offer a delicious array of tomato-infused dishes that celebrate this iconic ingredient.

The evolution of tomato-based sauces and dishes vividly illustrates how food practices evolve over time. As Italian cuisine gained international recognition, tomatoes became synonymous with Italian cooking, representing the richness of its culinary heritage. The journey of tomatoes from their initial rejection to becoming a beloved staple underscores the dynamic nature of food and culture, where ingredients are continuously re-evaluated and embraced as societies change. Today, tomatoes are celebrated not only for their flavor and versatility but also for the rich history and tradition they embody in Italian cooking.

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das New Delhi: Tamil Nadu has long been at the forefront of asserting its linguistic and cultural identity, often in defiance of policies it perceives as threats to its autonomy. The latest controversy surrounding the removal of the Bharatiya Rupee symbol (₹) from the state budget logo and its replacement with the Tamil alphabet ‘Ru’ has reignited debates about regionalism, nationalism, and the role of language in governance. Critics, especially from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have called this a deliberate move by the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government to undermine national unity, while supporters argue that it is a rightful assertion of Tamil pride. The debate has unfolded against the backdrop of Tamil Nadu’s historical opposition to the imposition of Hindi and the state’s ongoing conflict with the central government over linguistic policies. The Controversy: Replacing ₹ with ‘Ru’ Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin recently unveiled the 2025-26 state budget logo, which conspicuously replaced the ₹ symbol with the Tamil alphabet ‘Ru’. The decision was met with immediate backlash, with BJP MLA Vanathi Srinivasan criticizing the move as a planned act of disrespect towards a national symbol. “Yesterday, the CM posted the removal of the Rupee symbol. He was very specific about using the Tamil symbol. Of course, we are using the Tamil symbol, but he intentionally, in a planned way, is ignoring or disrespecting the national symbol. That is our concern,” she said. The controversy deepened when BJP Tamil Nadu Chief K Annamalai pointed out the irony behind the move. The original Rupee symbol (₹) was designed by D. Udaya Kumar, a Tamilian and the son of a former DMK MLA. Annamalai questioned why the DMK government would choose to discard a Tamil-origin national symbol, calling the decision misguided and unnecessary. A Legacy of Tamil Nadu’s Resistance to Central Influence To fully understand the significance of this controversy, one must look at Tamil Nadu’s history of opposing central policies that it views as impositions on its autonomy. The state has long been a stronghold of anti-Hindi sentiments, which date back to the Dravidian movement of the early 20th century. Tamil Nadu was at the forefront of the anti-Hindi agitations of 1965, which erupted in response to the central government’s attempt to make Hindi Bharat’s sole official language. The protests turned violent, leading to deaths, widespread unrest, and ultimately forcing the Bharatiya government to amend its stance and allow English to continue as an official language alongside Hindi. This fierce opposition to Hindi imposition has remained a defining feature of Tamil Nadu’s politics, influencing its education policies, government functioning, and linguistic preferences. The DMK and AIADMK, the two major Dravidian parties, have historically resisted any move that appears to threaten Tamil linguistic and cultural identity. The Three-Language Formula and the NEP Dispute The controversy over the Rupee symbol has also been fueled by Tamil Nadu’s opposition to the three-language formula proposed in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The NEP recommends that schools teach three languages, with an emphasis on Hindi, English, and a regional language. Tamil Nadu, however, has staunchly rejected this policy, fearing that it is a veiled attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi-speaking states. CM Stalin has vocally opposed the NEP, arguing that it undermines Tamil Nadu’s autonomy and linguistic diversity. The state has continued to adhere to its two-language policy (Tamil and English), refusing to introduce Hindi into the curriculum in government schools. The removal of the Rupee symbol in favor of ‘Ru’ could thus be seen as an extension of this ideological battle—a symbolic rejection of what the DMK sees as central impositions in favor of Tamil identity. A Political Move or Genuine Cultural Assertion? The DMK government has defended its decision, stating that the use

of the Tamil ‘Ru’ is a reflection of Tamil Nadu’s rich cultural heritage and linguistic pride. Supporters argue that this is not about rejecting the Bharatiya Rupee symbol but about promoting Tamil language and script in state affairs. However, critics, particularly from the BJP and its allies, see this as a calculated move to stir regional sentiments ahead of the 2024 elections. They argue that replacing a national symbol with a regional one is a dangerous precedent that could fuel further divisions between states and the Centre. BJP leaders have accused the DMK of intentionally stoking linguistic and regional pride to consolidate its voter base, particularly among those who resent the central government’s policies on language and education. Can Regional Identity and National Unity Coexist? The Tamil Nadu government’s decision to replace the Rupee symbol is a classic example of the tension between regional identity and national unity. On one hand, Bharat is a diverse country where states have the right to promote their languages and cultures. Tamil Nadu’s emphasis on Tamil pride and linguistic heritage is deeply rooted in its history and cannot be dismissed as mere political posturing. On the other hand, symbols play a crucial role in national unity. The Rupee symbol (₹) is not just a monetary sign but a representation of Bharat’s economic sovereignty and collective identity. When a state replaces such a widely accepted national emblem with a regional alternative, it raises concerns about unity, precedent, and the risk of further regional divisions. The bigger question is whether Bharat can embrace regional pride while maintaining national coherence. Can Tamil Nadu assert its linguistic identity without rejecting national symbols that bind the country together? The fine balance between federalism and nationalism is a constant negotiation in a country as diverse as Bharat. Conclusion: A Controversy That Won’t Fade Soon The replacement of the Rupee symbol with ‘Ru’ in the Tamil Nadu budget logo is far more than a graphic design choice—it is a statement of defiance, a symbol of Tamil assertion, and a continuation of Tamil Nadu’s long-standing resistance to perceived central impositions. While supporters of the move celebrate it as a tribute to Tamil heritage, opponents argue that it is an unnecessary and divisive political stunt aimed at provoking the central government and asserting Tamil Nadu’s regionalism over national unity. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether this is an isolated incident or the beginning of a larger movement toward regional identity politics in Tamil Nadu and beyond. What is clear, however, is that the DMK government is once again positioning itself as a champion of Tamil autonomy, setting the stage for yet another ideological battle with the Centre.   The post Tamil Nadu’s Symbolic Assertion: Replacing the Rupee Symbol and the Politics of Identity appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das New Delhi: Tamil Nadu has long been at the forefront of asserting its linguistic and cultural identity, often in defiance of policies it perceives as threats to its autonomy. The latest controversy surrounding the removal of the Bharatiya Rupee symbol (₹) from the state budget logo and its replacement with the Tamil alphabet ‘Ru’ has reignited debates about regionalism, nationalism, and the role of language in governance. Critics, especially from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have called this a deliberate move by the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government to undermine national unity, while supporters argue that it is a rightful assertion of Tamil pride. The debate has unfolded against the backdrop of Tamil Nadu’s historical opposition to the imposition of Hindi and the state’s ongoing conflict with the central government over linguistic policies. The Controversy: Replacing ₹ with ‘Ru’ Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin recently unveiled the 2025-26 state budget logo, which conspicuously replaced the ₹ symbol with the Tamil alphabet ‘Ru’. The decision was met with immediate backlash, with BJP MLA Vanathi Srinivasan criticizing the move as a planned act of disrespect towards a national symbol. “Yesterday, the CM posted the removal of the Rupee symbol. He was very specific about using the Tamil symbol. Of course, we are using the Tamil symbol, but he intentionally, in a planned way, is ignoring or disrespecting the national symbol. That is our concern,” she said. The controversy deepened when BJP Tamil Nadu Chief K Annamalai pointed out the irony behind the move. The original Rupee symbol (₹) was designed by D. Udaya Kumar, a Tamilian and the son of a former DMK MLA. Annamalai questioned why the DMK government would choose to discard a Tamil-origin national symbol, calling the decision misguided and unnecessary. A Legacy of Tamil Nadu’s Resistance to Central Influence To fully understand the significance of this controversy, one must look at Tamil Nadu’s history of opposing central policies that it views as impositions on its autonomy. The state has long been a stronghold of anti-Hindi sentiments, which date back to the Dravidian movement of the early 20th century. Tamil Nadu was at the forefront of the anti-Hindi agitations of 1965, which erupted in response to the central government’s attempt to make Hindi Bharat’s sole official language. The protests turned violent, leading to deaths, widespread unrest, and ultimately forcing the Bharatiya government to amend its stance and allow English to continue as an official language alongside Hindi. This fierce opposition to Hindi imposition has remained a defining feature of Tamil Nadu’s politics, influencing its education policies, government functioning, and linguistic preferences. The DMK and AIADMK, the two major Dravidian parties, have historically resisted any move that appears to threaten Tamil linguistic and cultural identity. The Three-Language Formula and the NEP Dispute The controversy over the Rupee symbol has also been fueled by Tamil Nadu’s opposition to the three-language formula proposed in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The NEP recommends that schools teach three languages, with an emphasis on Hindi, English, and a regional language. Tamil Nadu, however, has staunchly rejected this policy, fearing that it is a veiled attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi-speaking states. CM Stalin has vocally opposed the NEP, arguing that it undermines Tamil Nadu’s autonomy and linguistic diversity. The state has continued to adhere to its two-language policy (Tamil and English), refusing to introduce Hindi into the curriculum in government schools. The removal of the Rupee symbol in favor of ‘Ru’ could thus be seen as an extension of this ideological battle—a symbolic rejection of what the DMK sees as central impositions in favor of Tamil identity. A Political Move or Genuine Cultural Assertion? The DMK government has defended its decision, stating that the use

of the Tamil ‘Ru’ is a reflection of Tamil Nadu’s rich cultural heritage and linguistic pride. Supporters argue that this is not about rejecting the Bharatiya Rupee symbol but about promoting Tamil language and script in state affairs. However, critics, particularly from the BJP and its allies, see this as a calculated move to stir regional sentiments ahead of the 2024 elections. They argue that replacing a national symbol with a regional one is a dangerous precedent that could fuel further divisions between states and the Centre. BJP leaders have accused the DMK of intentionally stoking linguistic and regional pride to consolidate its voter base, particularly among those who resent the central government’s policies on language and education. Can Regional Identity and National Unity Coexist? The Tamil Nadu government’s decision to replace the Rupee symbol is a classic example of the tension between regional identity and national unity. On one hand, Bharat is a diverse country where states have the right to promote their languages and cultures. Tamil Nadu’s emphasis on Tamil pride and linguistic heritage is deeply rooted in its history and cannot be dismissed as mere political posturing. On the other hand, symbols play a crucial role in national unity. The Rupee symbol (₹) is not just a monetary sign but a representation of Bharat’s economic sovereignty and collective identity. When a state replaces such a widely accepted national emblem with a regional alternative, it raises concerns about unity, precedent, and the risk of further regional divisions. The bigger question is whether Bharat can embrace regional pride while maintaining national coherence. Can Tamil Nadu assert its linguistic identity without rejecting national symbols that bind the country together? The fine balance between federalism and nationalism is a constant negotiation in a country as diverse as Bharat. Conclusion: A Controversy That Won’t Fade Soon The replacement of the Rupee symbol with ‘Ru’ in the Tamil Nadu budget logo is far more than a graphic design choice—it is a statement of defiance, a symbol of Tamil assertion, and a continuation of Tamil Nadu’s long-standing resistance to perceived central impositions. While supporters of the move celebrate it as a tribute to Tamil heritage, opponents argue that it is an unnecessary and divisive political stunt aimed at provoking the central government and asserting Tamil Nadu’s regionalism over national unity. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether this is an isolated incident or the beginning of a larger movement toward regional identity politics in Tamil Nadu and beyond. What is clear, however, is that the DMK government is once again positioning itself as a champion of Tamil autonomy, setting the stage for yet another ideological battle with the Centre.   The post Tamil Nadu’s Symbolic Assertion: Replacing the Rupee Symbol and the Politics of Identity appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[mystarlightkrp]

✦ 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙎𝙏𝙀𝙇𝙇𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙎 𝙏𝙄𝙈𝙀𝙎

THE PRIME MINISTER SPEAKS: EMERGENCY RESOURCES ALLOCATED, THOUSANDS PRONOUNCED DEAD

The unprecedented disaster within The Deep continues. Thousands of Infernals are dead on the scene, thousands more are missing and at least ten thousand are estimated to be injured.

ㅤ

ㅤ

As we enter the afternoon, more information has been released about the tragic event that took place early this morning. Several Government officials, including now the Prime Minister, have proclaimed this to be a tragic disaster of natural causes, though other voices have begun to speak up and challenge that narrative.

Calling himself “The Viper”, a Demon who claims to be the “voice of the Infernals” spoke with The Stellaris Times. He offered a starkly different view of the disaster: “This was no accident. It happened in The Deep and it is affecting only the Infernals. This is a calculated attack on our very lives, and we will not stand for it. We demand that the Government seek justice. If they refuse, we will find it with our own hands. We know that the Angels are behind this attack, and they won’t get away with it.” However, the Demon didn’t stop his accusations at the Celestials. “We all know there’s really only one species with the power to do something like this, you lot just don’t want to admit it. Maybe the Celestials and the Mages are closer than we think.”

This incendiary statement has sparked widespread unease across Stellaris. Many citizens now seem hesitant to offer aid to Infernals, fearing that tensions might escalate to violence. There are also early reports of local businesses being looted—shops all across the city have begun to close early, boarding up their windows, worried that this hostile sentiment will turn into real chaos when the sun sets.

Reports from an insider suggest that the close-door Government meeting went on for hours and that arguments grew very heated. The Government’s apparent inability to unite has drawn criticism from many who feel the response has been slow and disorganized. Many who have been left uninspired by the Government’s lackluster response.

After hours of deliberation, Prime Minister Lee met with the press to address the nation and announce the steps they would be taking in the wake of this catastrophe. He began by addressing the speculation: “Preliminary findings from our seismologists and Elemental experts suggest that this was a natural disaster of catastrophic magnitude. We have assigned a team to investigate, but at this moment there is no evidence to indicate a deliberate man-made attack.”

“We have committed emergency funds and resources to aid those displaced by the disaster. Housing and medical services are being prioritized,” Prime Minister Lee continued to explain, detailing some of the efforts to mitigate overcrowding and the support of the Stellaris General Hospital, which has since been reported to have reached critical capacity following the disaster.

Amongst the emergency measures announced by the Prime Minister, it was declared that the Portal would remain open but with doubled security personnel stationed to monitor its use—it is highly discouraged to travel to and from Earth for leisure or unless absolutely necessary.

Additionally, to alleviate the growing strain and overcrowding in the Slave Quarters, an unprecedented measure was announced: the Species Ambassadors and Cabinet Ministers have voted in favor of halving Slave rental prices for the upcoming two weeks, in hopes of encouraging Masters to welcome more slaves into their homes.

The Prime Minister concluded his speech with a simple call for unity: “This is a time for unity, not division. I urge every citizen to remain calm and follow updates from reliable sources.”

Shortly after Prime Minister Lee addressed the nation, reactions began to pour in. The Vampire Cadell Nox, leader of the ancient Nox clan, made a statement of his own: “A natural disaster? Don’t make me laugh. If you ask me, throughout history every time something happens in The Deep and to the Infernals, the Celestials are involved. Prime Minister Lee’s speech said very little about bringing the culprits to justice and a lot about keeping up appearances. Where’s the justice for our citizens in the underground? Are they any less worthy?”

As rescue operations continue, the Stellarian healthcare system is overwhelmed and the true extent of the damage remains unclear. The inflammatory accusations from The Viper and Cadell Nox have only intensified tensions, leaving many citizens wondering whether the Government’s response will be enough to quell the growing paranoia and unrest.

As the sun begins to set and night approaches, citizens are encouraged to remain indoors. It is not yet clear if the displaced Infernals will rise to their self-proclaimed leader’s call to action, but it remains true that when darkness comes, they have the advantage. As the city prepares for what could be a long night, authorities are on high alert. The next few hours may prove critical in determining the course of events.

The Stellaris Timeswill be providing ongoing coverage as the story progresses.

[bllsbailey]

Broken: 'The Resistance' Is Mostly MIA for Trump 2.0

Do you remember the liberal meltdowns after Trump defeated Hillary Clinton for the presidency in 2016? 

There were huge “P-hat” demonstrations (riots), widespread outrage, and unhinged commentary from the corrupt media. Now, we still see that today, some eight years later, as Trump won yet again, but it’s not the same. 

There’s a feeling of defeat emanating from the left. 

Mostly, we see videos of mentally disturbed Democrats losing their stuff on social media and misty-eyed anchors at MSNBC and CNN still trying to tell us our Democracy is in peril (their ratings prove that few are listening anymore), but we haven’t seen any serious coordinated reaction.

The thrill is gone, according to Axios:

While President-elect Trump's 2016 win sparked shock, outrage and massive protests, the response to his 2024 victory has been more muted. The big picture: 2016 birthed The Resistance, a political movement to protest Trumpism online and in the streets. There's still plenty of resistance to Trump across the country, but little mass mobilization. Flashback: Trump won in 2016 despite trailing in the polls, and within weeks of the infamous Access Hollywood tape and multiple sexual assault allegations.

Do you remember this (perverted) idiocy?

Seriously, a governor donned a genitalia-themed cap? Give me a break.

But for now, "The Resistance" just plain seems to have lost its mojo:

This time Democratic voters, particularly women, were just as disappointed but less shocked, says Lisa Mueller, a political science professor at Macalester College.

I love this photograph:

To be sure, there are many who will continue to fight on for the failed progressive movement—especially blue-state governors—and expect some knock-down, drag-out fights over Trump’s Cabinet picks.

A failure to read the room: 

REPORT: California to Lead 'Resistance' Against the Orange Man What Is Bad

Left-Wing Donors Wary As They Fear Funding Won't Buy the 'Resistance' It Used to in a New Era of Trump

Unity, Schmunity: Leftist Governors Declare War on Trump's Agenda Just Days After His Historic Victory

There are also plans for inauguration day protests, but we’ll see if some of the usual agitators are too burnt out from all the pro-Hamas demonstrations they’ve been attending since October 2023. And you can be sure odious former Rep. now Sen. Adam Schiff (CA) will do everything in his power to kneecap the Trump agenda, ethics be damned.

But at least for now, it feels different than 2016.

It feels like Trump broke them.

[beardedmrbean]

BANGKOK (AP) — An airstrike by Myanmar’s military on a village in the country’s central Sagaing region hit a school on Monday, killing as many as 20 students and two teachers, according to a member of a resistance group, an aid worker and media reports.

The morning attack on Ohe Htein Twin village in the region’s Tabayin township, also known as Depayin, also wounded dozens of students, they said.

State-run MRTV television denied the reports of the airstrike on Monday evening's news broadcast, saying subversive media outlets were intentionally spreading fake news.

The military has increasingly used airstrikes to counter a widespread armed struggle against its rule, which began in February 2021 when it seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi. More than 6,600 civilians are estimated to have been killed by security forces since then, according to figures compiled by nongovernmental organizations.

A member of the White Depeyin People's Defence Force resistance group fighting against army rule told The Associated Press that a fighter jet dropped a bomb directly onto a school, where many students from primary to high school levels were studying after 9 a.m. The area is about 115 kilometers (70 miles) northwest of Mandalay, Myanmar's second-largest city.

The resistance fighter, who rushed to the site of the attack to help the victims, spoke on condition of anonymity because he was afraid of being arrested by the military. He said that 20 students and two teachers were killed in the attack on the school, which is operated by the country’s pro-democracy movement, and about 50 others were wounded. Three nearby houses were damaged.

He also said that there had been no recent fighting in the area, though Sagaing is a stronghold of the resistance.

Nay Phone Latt, a spokesperson for the opposition’s National Unity Government, told the AP that he received the same information on the number of casualties, and that the death toll could rise. The organization is the main opposition group coordinating resistance to military rule.

He accused the military of deliberately attacking civilians in monasteries, refugee camps, schools and hospitals, with the excuse that resistance fighters were sheltering at such sites, though this was not the case and the bombings were intended to alienate the people from the resistance movement.

The military's denial of the attack on state television cited an unnamed local official saying that security forces were working only to maintain peace in the area and not bombing nonmilitary targets, while terrorists were shelling and launching drone attacks at townships and villages that didn't support them.

The death tolls from Monday's bombing reported by independent Myanmar media ranged from 17 to more than 20. A volunteer in Tabayin assisting displaced people who asked not to be identified because of fear of government reprisals said he received the information from the ground that 12 students were confirmed dead and around 30-50 others were wounded.

Sagaing region, near the border with India, has been a stronghold of armed resistance, and the military in recent years has stepped up airstrikes against the local pro-democracy People's Defense Forces. The resistance has no effective defense against air attacks.

In September 2022, aerial attacks by the military’s helicopters against a school and village in Let Yet Kone village in the same township, killed at least 13 people, including seven children.

Airstrikes in April 2023 airstrikes killed as many as 160 people, including many children, who were attending a ceremony held by opponents of army rule outside Pazigyi village in Sagaing region’s Kanbalu township.

Airstrikes in Myanmar garnered increased attention recently when numerous reports deemed credible by the United Nations and human rights groups said that they continued to be carried out in the wake of Myanmar's devastating March 28 earthquake, after which the military and resistance groups declared ceasefires to facilitate relief efforts.

[tjnewsnigeria]

A heated debate broke out in Nigeria’s House of Representatives on Thursday, with lawmakers sharply divided over a controversial bill proposing the adoption of Sharia law as a basis for governance in the country. The bill, which aims to establish aspects of Islamic governance, has ignited concerns about religious equity and national unity. Tensions soared as members exchanged words, with some legislators expressing fear that the bill could mark a step towards the "Islamisation" of Nigeria, a country constitutionally recognised as a secular state. "Section 10 of the Nigerian Constitution says: 'The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion. Representative John Olufemi, a vocal critic, condemned the proposed legislation, arguing it violates the secular framework upheld in the constitution. "You cannot Islamise Nigeria," Olufemi asserted, drawing nods of agreement from members across party lines who fear the bill could inflame religious sensitivities. Proponents of the bill, however, argued that it seeks to provide a legal framework for states in northern Nigeria that already practice aspects of Sharia law. Representative Abdullahi Shehu, supporting the bill, claimed that it respects religious diversity and that the option to adopt Sharia law would remain within state jurisdiction, not a federal mandate. " This is about respecting the religious practices of our people, not enforcing it nationwide," Shehu explained, suggesting that states with large Muslim populations would benefit from clearer legislative guidelines on Sharia. The bill has sparked widespread concern beyond the House, with various religious and civil rights groups warning that its passage could exacerbate religious divisions. Bishop Matthew Kuka, a prominent Christian leader, called the proposal "a dangerous precedent" and urged lawmakers to consider the bill's potential impact on Nigeria's fragile unity. Civil society organisations have also voiced opposition, emphasising the importance of maintaining Nigeria’s status as a secular nation where no religion holds dominance. As deliberations continue, the bill’s future remains uncertain. If passed, it would represent a significant shift in Nigeria’s approach to governance and religious tolerance. For now, the House has referred the bill to a committee for further review, though it remains a focal point of controversy. Stay informed with Ejes Gist News – Your Source for Credible News in Nigeria Now.

[factinhistory]

What Happened on October 10 in Canadian History?

October 10 holds significant historical importance in Canada, marking pivotal moments that have shaped the nation���s political landscape and cultural identity. From the swearing-in of influential leaders to the emergence of critical political movements, this date has witnessed events that reflect Canada’s evolving society. The events discussed in this article will provide a glimpse into the complexities of Canadian history, highlighting how these occurrences have influenced the trajectory of the nation.

This article will explore four notable events that took place on October 10: the swearing-in of Robert Borden as Prime Minister in 1911, the developments during the October Crisis in 1970, the formation of the Parti Québécois in 1968, and the birth of Louis Riel in 1844. Each event serves as a key milestone in understanding Canada’s political evolution and cultural diversity, illustrating the dynamics that have shaped the country’s identity.

What Happened on October 10 in Canadian History?

Robert Borden Sworn In as Prime Minister (1911)

On October 10, 1911, Robert Borden was sworn in as the Prime Minister of Canada, succeeding Sir Wilfrid Laurier. Borden, a member of the Conservative Party, took office during a period of significant change in Canada. His leadership would span crucial events, including World War I, which would profoundly impact the nation’s political and social landscape. Borden’s tenure marked a shift in Canadian politics, moving toward a more centralized federal government and greater involvement in international affairs.

One of Borden’s primary challenges upon taking office was addressing the issue of trade. He advocated for a new tariff policy aimed at protecting Canadian industries from foreign competition, a stance that would lead to tensions with the United States. His government also grappled with the growing calls for increased support for the military, particularly as Canada prepared to engage in World War I. Borden’s leadership during this tumultuous period would ultimately shape Canada’s emerging national identity and its role on the world stage.

Borden’s government was marked by significant achievements, including the introduction of the War Measures Act, which granted the federal government sweeping powers during wartime. This legislation would have lasting implications for civil liberties in Canada. Borden’s focus on national unity and his support for conscription during the war would create deep divisions within Canadian society, particularly between English and French Canadians. His swearing-in on October 10, 1911, represents a crucial turning point in Canadian history, laying the groundwork for the complex political dynamics that would follow in the decades to come.

The October Crisis Developments (1970)

On October 10, 1970, Canada was engulfed in the turmoil of the October Crisis, a period characterized by political instability and social unrest in Quebec. This crisis was primarily driven by the activities of the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ), a separatist group that sought to promote Quebec independence through violent means. The FLQ had conducted a series of bombings and kidnappings, leading to widespread fear and concern across the nation.

The most significant event of the October Crisis occurred just days before, on October 5, when the FLQ kidnapped British diplomat James Cross. The government’s response was swift and decisive, leading to a heightened state of alert. Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau faced mounting pressure to take action, resulting in the invocation of the War Measures Act on October 16. This legislation allowed for the suspension of civil liberties and the deployment of the military to restore order, marking the first time it had been used in peacetime.

The October Crisis had far-reaching implications for Canadian society and politics. It exposed the deep-seated divisions within Quebec and the rest of Canada regarding issues of nationalism, identity, and autonomy. Trudeau’s government faced criticism for its heavy-handed response, which many viewed as an infringement on civil rights. The crisis ultimately led to a national conversation about the future of Quebec within Canada, influencing subsequent political developments and shaping the discourse surrounding Canadian federalism.

In the aftermath of the crisis, the public’s perception of the FLQ and Quebec nationalism shifted significantly. While some viewed the group as terrorists, others sympathized with the underlying grievances that fueled their actions. The events of October 10, 1970, serve as a reminder of the complexities of Canadian identity and the ongoing struggle for balance between national unity and regional autonomy.

The Formation of the Parti Québécois (1968)

On October 10, 1968, the Parti Québécois (PQ) was officially formed, marking a significant milestone in Quebec’s political history. Founded by René Lévesque and a group of former Liberal Party members, the PQ aimed to promote Quebec nationalism and the pursuit of sovereignty for the province. This new political force emerged during a period of increasing demands for social, economic, and political reforms within Quebec, reflecting the aspirations of a growing number of Québécois who sought greater autonomy.

The formation of the PQ signaled a shift in Quebec’s political landscape, as it united various nationalist factions under a single banner. Lévesque’s vision for Quebec was one of social justice, economic independence, and cultural pride. The party quickly gained support among a populace disillusioned with the traditional political establishment, resonating with the aspirations of those seeking to redefine Quebec’s role within Canada. The PQ’s platform included calls for the nationalization of key industries and the establishment of a distinct identity for Quebecers.

The impact of the Parti Québécois on Canadian politics cannot be overstated. The party’s rise to prominence culminated in the 1976 provincial election when it won a majority government. This victory marked the first time a sovereignty-oriented party held power in Quebec. The PQ’s governance would lead to significant debates about Quebec’s place within Canada, culminating in the 1980 referendum on sovereignty-association, which ultimately failed. The formation of the Parti Québécois on October 10, 1968, represents a crucial development in the evolution of Quebec nationalism and its ongoing influence on Canadian politics.

The Birth of Louis Riel (1844)

On October 10, 1844, Louis Riel was born in the Red River Settlement, in what is now Manitoba. Riel would grow to become one of Canada’s most prominent and controversial historical figures, known for his role as a leader of the Métis people and as a central figure in the struggle for their rights and recognition. His early life was marked by the cultural and political tensions of the time, as the Métis faced increasing pressures from both British colonial authorities and expanding Canadian settlements.

Riel’s significance in Canadian history is largely attributed to his leadership during two major uprisings: the Red River Rebellion of 1869-70 and the North-West Rebellion of 1885. His involvement in the Red River Rebellion was particularly noteworthy, as he sought to defend the rights of the Métis and ensure their inclusion in the new Canadian Confederation. Riel’s actions during this period culminated in the establishment of a provisional government, which negotiated the terms of Manitoba’s entry into Canada, securing important rights for the Métis.

However, Riel’s later life was marked by tragedy and conflict. After the Red River Rebellion, he faced persecution and went into exile in the United States. He returned to Canada in 1885 to lead the North-West Rebellion, which ultimately ended in defeat and led to his trial and execution for treason. Riel’s birth on October 10, 1844, marks the beginning of a life that would deeply influence the narrative of Métis rights in Canada and spark ongoing discussions about identity, sovereignty, and reconciliation in Canadian society.

Conclusion

October 10 has proven to be a date of considerable significance in Canadian history, marked by events that reflect the country’s political evolution and cultural diversity. The swearing-in of Robert Borden as Prime Minister in 1911, the developments during the October Crisis in 1970, the formation of the Parti Québécois in 1968, and the birth of Louis Riel in 1844 all exemplify critical moments that have shaped Canada’s national identity.

These events highlight the complexities of Canadian society, illustrating the ongoing struggles for political representation, cultural recognition, and regional autonomy. As Canada continues to navigate its diverse heritage and aspirations, the historical moments observed on October 10 serve as reminders of the importance of dialogue, understanding, and collaboration in shaping the future of this vibrant nation.

[betshy]

Scapegoating: 12 Things Hitler Blamed the Jews For

Adolf Hitler's hatred towards the Jewish community is well-documented in history. He used the Jews as scapegoats for many of Germany's problems during the 1930s and 1940s, ultimately leading to the horrific atrocities of the Holocaust. Here are 12 things Hitler blamed the Jews for: 1. Economic issues: Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany's economic woes, accusing them of hoarding wealth and conspiring to control the country's financial institutions. During a time when many Germans were dissatisfied with the Weimar Republic due to hyperinflation and unemployment, Hitler propagated the idea that the Jews were not only responsible for the country's woes but also actively working to undermine German society. This scapegoating resonated with a populace desperate for explanations for their suffering, as the economic instability led to widespread poverty and despair. By painting a picture of Jews as the malevolent puppeteers behind the financial crisis, Hitler fostered a sense of unity among those who felt disenfranchised, redirecting their frustration toward a common enemy. The narrative he constructed not only deepened existing societal prejudices but also allowed him to exploit the economic chaos to garner political support, ultimately paving the way for the rise of the Nazi regime amidst the backdrop of societal turmoil and discontent. 2. Political unrest: Hitler believed that the Jews were behind the political unrest and social unrest in Germany, including strikes, protests, and uprisings. His rhetoric intensified as protests erupted across the nation, leading to a dangerous environment where Jews were increasingly marginalised and blamed for the struggles faced by the populace. The atmosphere of fear and suspicion that enveloped the nation served to fuel Hitler's agenda, justifying increasingly aggressive policies against those he accused of sowing discord. 3. Defeat in World War I: Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany's defeat in World War I, claiming that they had undermined the war effort and betrayed the country. He argued that they had acted in their own self-interest rather than contributing to the national cause, promoting the notion that Jews were responsible for spreading defeatism and dissent among the populace. This narrative gained traction among various segments of society, fuelled by a combination of economic hardship and social unrest that followed the war, further embedding the idea that the Jewish community was a scapegoat for Germany's failures and hardships in the aftermath of the conflict. 4. Immorality: Hitler viewed the Jewish faith as immoral and portrayed the Jewish people as corrupting German society with their supposedly degenerate culture. This perception was rooted in a combination of deeply ingrained stereotypes and unsubstantiated beliefs, which painted Jews as a harmful influence on the social and moral fabric of the nation. He argued that their customs and traditions undermined German values, leading to the decay of what he defined as a pure Aryan society. By fostering a narrative that depicted Jews as the enemies of the state, Hitler aimed to unify the German populace under his ideology and divert attention from the country's economic struggles, ultimately blaming the Jewish community for various societal ills. This dangerous rhetoric fuelled discrimination, hatred, and ultimately, violence against Jews, contributing to the tragic events of the Holocaust. 5. Communist ideology: Hitler associated the Jews with communism and believed that they were trying to spread their ideology in Germany, threatening the stability of the nation. This belief was rooted in a complex web of conspiracy theories that portrayed Jews as the architects of a sinister plot to undermine societal order. He argued that Jewish influences were infiltrating key institutions, manipulating the masses, and promoting class struggle, which he viewed as a direct challenge to the German way of life. As a result, Hitler and the Nazi regime utilised this narrative to justify their discriminatory policies, fostering a sense of urgency among their followers to combat what they perceived as an existential danger to the country. This baseless association between Jews and communism not only fuelled widespread antisemitism but also laid the groundwork for the extreme measures the Nazis would later take to eradicate Jewish people from German society. 6. Cultural decay: Hitler believed that the Jews were responsible for the decay of German culture, accusing them of promoting decadent art, literature, and music. He argued that this influence corrupted the morals and values of society, leading to a decline in traditional German customs and aesthetics. In his view, the proliferation of Jewish artists and intellectuals threatened to undermine the cultural integrity of the nation, pushing forward an agenda that glorified disarray and chaos rather than the disciplined beauty inherent in German heritage. This misguided perception fuelled a toxic narrative that blamed Jews for not only cultural changes but also societal unrest, further entrenching anti-Semitic sentiment during that tumultuous period in history. 7. Racial impurity: Hitler was a firm believer in the pseudoscience of eugenics, which promoted the idea that human populations could be improved through selective breeding. He viewed the Jewish people as a significant threat to the purity and superiority of the Aryan race, a concept which he used to justify his deeply xenophobic and discriminatory policies. This belief was rooted in a twisted interpretation of social Darwinism, leading to widespread persecution, segregation, and ultimately, the horrific consequences of the Holocaust. Hitler’s ideology fuelled a societal obsession with racial purity, leading to the implementation of measures aimed at controlling reproduction and eradicating those perceived as inferior, thereby fostering a climate of hatred and intolerance that had devastating effects across Europe. 8. Bolshevism: Hitler viewed Bolshevism as a Jewish conspiracy to undermine Western civilisation and portrayed the Jews as the masterminds behind communist movements around the world. This perspective was deeply rooted in anti-Semitic ideology, which falsely claimed that Jewish people were not only the architects of communism but also sought to dismantle traditional societal structures to gain power. Hitler propagated the belief that the spread of Bolshevism was a direct threat to the values and stability of Europe, fostering a narrative that intensified fear and hatred towards Jews. By framing international communism in this way, he was able to rally support for his own political agenda, emphasising the need to combat what he perceived as a coordinated assault on the Aryan race and the foundations of a moral society. 9. The distortion of the Bible: Hitler believed that Jews had eliminated manuscripts of persecuted Christians and had altered the New Testament according to Judaism. This unfounded conspiracy theory fuelled his anti-Semitic rhetoric and served as a justification for the horrific actions taken against Jewish individuals and communities during his regime. He posited that by manipulating religious texts, Jewish people had undermined Christian beliefs and values throughout history, creating a narrative that painted them as a direct threat to the fabric of society. This warped perception of reality not only distorted historical facts but also played a significant role in the broader socio-political context, inciting hatred and violence that echoed through the ages. 10. International conspiracy: Hitler believed that the Jewish people were part of a global conspiracy to dominate the world, controlling governments, media, and financial institutions for their own gain. This unfounded theory fuelled his anti-Semitic ideology and provided a convenient scapegoat for societal problems in Germany. He propagated the belief that Jews manipulated the populace and influenced key political decisions, creating a narrative that portrayed them as an insidious group working against the interests of the state and its citizens. This toxic rhetoric was not only a means to justify his oppressive policies but also served to rally supporters by appealing to their fears and prejudices, culminating in widespread discrimination and violence against Jewish communities across Europe. The consequences of this belief were catastrophic, leading to events that would forever mark history with deep scars of injustice and atrocity. 11. Deicide: As a Christian, Hitler held a deep-seated resentment against the Jews for the murder of Jesus Christ, which he perceived as a betrayal that had fundamentally altered the course of history. This belief not only fuelled his anti-Semitic ideology but also manifested in his attempts to scapegoat the Jewish community for Germany's socio-economic struggles following World War I. Hitler's interpretation of Christianity intertwined with his distorted racial theories, led him to advocate for an extreme form of nationalism that positioned Jews as the ultimate enemy. This toxic blend of religious fervour and pseudo-scientific racial doctrines contributed to the widespread persecution and horrific violence that characterised the Holocaust, revealing a dark chapter in both religious and world history. 12. The Holocaust: Ultimately, Hitler blamed the Jewish people for all of Germany's problems and used this as justification for implementing his Final Solution, a horrific policy that led to the systematic extermination of six million Jews during the Holocaust. This genocidal campaign was characterised by the establishment of concentration camps, where countless individuals were subjected to brutal conditions, forced labour, and inhumane treatment. The Nazis propagated a pervasive anti-Semitic ideology that dehumanised Jews, portraying them as the root cause of economic distress and societal unrest in post-World War I Germany. Communities were decimated, families torn apart, and the cultural contributions of Jewish people were erased in an attempt to create a so-called Aryan society. The echoes of this tragic chapter in history remind us of the danger of hatred and intolerance, emphasising the importance of remembrance and education to prevent such atrocities from occurring in the future. It is important to remember the destructive power of scapegoating and propaganda, as well as the dangers of unchecked hatred and bigotry. The Holocaust stands as a stark reminder of the consequences of allowing such ideologies to take hold in society. It is our responsibility to learn from history and ensure that such horrors are never repeated. Read the full article