#charlie qs

[charliesimss]

💌 Post 4 pictures from Pinterest that describe your OC. Send this to 3 other simmers to keep the chain going!

The wheel chose Gemma, and I actually have a pin board for her.

[bbubbleo]

FOR YOU ANON IM SO SORRY THIS TOOK SO LONG!! </3

[hiskillingjar]

we want to know about your murder boys !!!!!

YAYYYYY thank you for the murder boy support!!!! (cw my bad art lol)

meet charlie and edgar!! they're my edgy goth murder boy ocs and i love them. they are so silly.

edgar is the one who does murders tho (he's also a snuff movie creator because i'm SoOoOoOoO oRiGiNaL!!!! but it's because he couldn't get into art school so it's different) while charlie is his clueless enabler (though he gets his final boy moment!) charlie also has a lesbian ex girlfriend called dahlia and edgar has a toxic FWB relationship with the cop trying to catch him! drama!!!

bonus:

honking and shooing and mee-mee-meeing (also charlie is catholic booooo boo this man)

[philhoffman]

Y’all might know that the Dryden Theater in PSH’s hometown Rochester, NY, is hosting a year-long series of his films—it’s where I met Phil’s mom in June <3

They’re screening God’s Pocket later this month, including a special Q&A with director John Slattery!! The Dryden and Phil’s family are currently collecting questions to ask John—about the film, working with Phil on God’s Pocket or Charlie Wilson’s War, etc.

If y’all have any questions, please let me know here or on anon, whatever you prefer, and I can pass them on!! You can also submit them yourself on the Remembering Philip Seymour Hoffman facebook page. I’m looking into whether the Q&A will be available later for those of us who can’t make it to Rochester :)

[aliterarydance]

Hey Heartstopper Community

Serious question - what have we collectively decided to tag Nick and Charlie content as? Is it "nick and charlie" OR "nick x charlie" OR "nick nelson x charlie spring" OR does it really have to be "narlie"? I'm sorry but I kind of really dislike narlie as the couple name. Based on tumblr's own tag follower count I'm think "nick x charlie" since that has the most followers, but I thought I'd ask and see what others in the fandom think. Any responses would be greatly appreciated <3

[connor6leapfrog]

Stay Away from Me You Freak

[jamestaylorswift]

NEED you to elaborate on the Thing please

Yes! The Thing!! If you have thoughts about The Thing, anon, I’d love to hear them.

I can’t for the life of me figure out what to properly call The Thing other than like…at times a cross between and at times just a drone and an ostinato and just background voicings? And mix in the functional opposite of pedaling? A more technical name, if it exists, is escaping me and a few google searches have not helped me figure out if such a term was ever in my brain. I will continue to call it The Thing until I figure it out.

The best way I can illustrate The Thing is *puts on my tiktoker voice* okay so you know the thing where a song is in (let’s say) the key of G and then there’s just this one synth that’s playing G constantly and oh look here it’s in another song too, just this one instrument playing the root, oh and in this song it’s doing a little boop boop boop but it’s still just a (let’s say) G major triad, oh and here we have it in THIS song too, you can hear the melody changing and the chords changing kind of around it but it’s jUst the ROOT rIGht There and it never stops and it never changes and oh my god watch out it’s even in this song because you see while these notes are being arpeggiated they’re just the notes of the first chord and the chord being arpeggiated doesn’t change even though there is a chord progression to different chords do you see what I’m saying??? guys I think this means something

Before I go on I should emphasize that Jack Antonoff is neither the only nor first artist to use The Thing or write songs that sound like This (“This,” of course, being the technical term for songs employing The Thing). I don’t think he or The Thing are “the problem” with (popular) music. It’s not like this is even a particularly new development in his music—I’d argue that it appeared at least 4-5 years ago if not earlier. And it’s hard for me to tell the extent to which The Thing is contributing to the rise in Jack Antonoff haterism of the past half decade. The reason I bring it up is that being cognizant of The Thing is different than being floored by its absolute overuse/oversaturation/overreliance (take your pick and then soften it a little) on the Bleachers self titled album. The latter I was last month. The Thing is not bad, it just is. That’s all.

Honestly one of the reasons I was so surprised when hearing Bleachers is that it really cemented how important understanding the context of The Thing is for identifying The Thing itself. I almost think it’s more obvious that Jack is using The Thing when the part that’s playing it is not as front-and-center. If said part is front-and-center then it’s given extreme musical importance. However, the Thing is important as an additive feature, and it’s rarely the main idea. Textural complexity is often subtle and so is The Thing. Similarly, The Thing is useful rhythmically when it’s repetitive and harmonically when it’s static. It’s the marriage of these three features that identify The Thing and that give The Thing value.

Here is an “annotated bibliography,” if you will, of examples of recent Jack Antonoff songs that employ The Thing. Note that this is a biased sample from songs I know/like/listen to enough to have them paged into my memory for constructing this argument. I did not do a comprehensive deep dive of Jack’s recent projects to come up with this list. Don’t take this as a timeline of The Thing’s existence. Also, this is highly subjective and there can be overlap between these categories. IMO they all kind of count as The Thing but I’m breaking it up for the purpose of illustration. You know how it is...

The “obvious use of The Thing” category:

“I Am Right On Time” (Bleachers) - good example of many The Thing and The Thing-adjacent parts! The gist of the song is a medium-high tempo song that steadily builds up. Part of the way Jack achieves this is by having a single electric guitar strum the same chord on 2 and 4 to create a backbeat. There’s also the ostinato (staccato synth rhythm on beats 2, 3, and 4) and single note (also just a single synth) that you can hear in the first and second verses and then continuing as the song builds to the end. All are very clearly establishing the key of the song and remaining at that center while the melody and chords change.

“Self Respect” (Bleachers) - in this category because of the large number of The Thing things. At very least, I’m counting the arpeggiated chord and the syncopated piano rhythm as appearances of The Thing. This song has the same ethos of “I Am Right On Time,” excitement built as the song becomes more musically busy. The Thing helps in that endeavor by contributing thickness, again mostly texturally and rhythmically, to the song.

“Me Before You” (Bleachers) - most notable instance of The Thing/its beginning in this song is that syncopated synth rhythm that starts at the beginning of the first verse and plays throughout the rest of the majority of the song. I put this song in this category, as opposed to the third, because I think this is a good example of the most basic/simple form of The Thing. At its core, The Thing is just playing around with how much of the root can be folded in to a song without crossing the threshold of making it sound “boring” or static or like something you’ve heard before. This part is just playing the same rhythm on one note. Because there’s not as much dynamic excitement/variation in this song, The Thing does less legwork than in other songs. But you can see how this could be the logical beginning for overreliance on The Thing.

“Isimo” (Bleachers) - Same explanation as above. The hemiola rhythm is just played over and over on the root. To me this part seems to be working pretty equally for rhythm, harmony, and texture.

The “eh, you could argue either way” category:

“Alma Mater” (Bleachers) - In the last minute or so there’s a lilting sax part that’s mostly there for textural/rhythmic purposes. Nonetheless, I think it’s a little ditty in the spirit of The Thing.

“Tiny Moves” (Bleachers) - This one is tricky and, in my opinion, easier to argue against. The main synth part (quarter notes of the 2-3 notes clustered around the root) is particularly salient as not clearly The Thing but clearly Thing-adjacent. The part is rhythmic, of course, but also plays a fairly important harmonic part in establishing the key center and keeping it relevant at all times. It has enough slight variation to make the song fun in a quirky way.

“The 1975” (The 1975) - Included because it’s very similar in spirit to “Tiny Moves.” Again, the quasi-randomness in this song makes it interesting and effective. Whether you like it or not, it is, at the very least, Thing-adjacent.

“91” (Bleachers) - The Point of this song is that repeated cello ostinato. Of course it doesn’t move. That’s The Point. That’s…The Thing, if you will.

“Question…?” (Taylor Swift) - Syn-co. Pa-ted. Synth-sound. Same-notes. The-Thing. Or-not. It-could. Just-be. The-synth. That-comps. The-chords. Your-choice.

The “The Thing, but more so its ontological beginning” category:

“Free” (Florence + The Machine) - all I can say is: B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B (break for the bridge and Florence’s ethereal vocals) B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B

“Looking For Somebody (To Love)” (The 1975) - all I can say is: A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A (break for the bridge - at this point I should acknowledge that it’s not like this the whole time and, yes, the bass very much matters and there is a “stronger/more obvious” chord progression in this song than “Free”) A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A

“Anti-Hero” (Taylor Swift) - all I can say is: E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E (okay you get the picture, also in this song there is a bit more variation from seminal The Thing because other synth parts are loudly playing other notes in the chord progression)

“The Archer” (Taylor Swift) - good song! Don’t you love how much C there is? Don’t you?! But that’s what helps make it work so well, in case that wasn’t clear. Oh there’s some variation too. But… C *hold for 3 minutes*

“mirrorball” (Taylor Swift) - another good example of the beginning of The Thing. The reason this song feels so “hazy” is that one of the guitars is just constantly playing the root chord, and any dissonance these chords’ individual notes’ dissonance have with other chords’ notes starts to melt away as you just get more entrenched in the first mode. (That is, it’s literally just vibes.) You can draw a very clear through-line between this sound and the next 3 years of Jack’s work.

IMO the reason The Thing is is not a vocally disliked part Jack Antonoff’s production style or music is that it’s hard to get your generic-enjoyer-of-western-pop-music to truly dislike songs that are so very drenched in “the ionian mode” or “the key” or whatever you want sum it up as. (Myself included—I hate neither Jack’s music nor The Thing.) If you’re playing a pop song only in the key of G then the more G you add, usually the better. The more D you add, often the better. The more B you add, yeah, sometimes-to-often the better. We—our ears and brains—have been trained to love and crave a certain amount that sameness, that root-iness, “the 1” (iykyk 🤪). Artists can, should, do evolve—and Jack has...and still, I don’t see people naming The Thing as what they hate about his music. Until twitter randos’ criticism becomes just slightly more targeted/technical I’m inclined to believe it is truly just nebulous haterism instead of, for example, constructive feedback about his style. I digress.

(If you’re wondering, my hypothesis for The Thing’s rise in prevalence over the last few years is to attribute it to the coincidental rise of whisper-y girl bedroom pop plus a subconscious sonic backlash to the pop music that dominated the late 2010s, specifically 2017-2018. In fairness, I don’t listen to a lot of either of those things so I don’t have good evidence off the top of my head for this theory. But, like, I’m sure Ed Sheeran has used The Thing too. Just a hypothesis, ya know.)

Here’s a far more fascinating line of inquiry that I’m trying to explore (still not sure what my answer is though): Can The Thing’s relevance, of course related to its artistic usefulness/ubiquity but also specifically Jack’s prominence in pop music, potentially be understood through the lens of an aesthetic?

To argue that The Thing has aesthetic value would be to argue that its virtues of textural, rhythmic, and harmonic complexity are more highly prized than the music produced avoiding/excluding that. Do we truly value the sensory experiences of being bathed in a singular note, a singular chord? Do we like that more than when we feel pulled in a strong current of a harmonic cadence? It’s clear we like The Thing because we’re nowhere close to, for instance, rioting at its very appearance like crowds did when they heard the dissonance of Shostakovich’s “The Rite of Spring.” But how much do we really love The Thing? Do we value it only because it’s highly available—Jack Antonoff still being a preeminent purveyor of pop music—and because we perceive few ways to escape his sonic influence? How much do we account for the fact that he did not invent The Thing? If we truly do love The Thing, when did this came about, originally and recently? Why would we truly love The Thing?

A final digression: I do think the shift towards use of The Thing this should be a credit to Jack. Over the last half decade, Jack has shown more restraint from a textural and dynamic point of view and been able to exercise that restraint to create warmer and more complex soundscapes. That kind of restraint helps “the softs seem softer and the louds seem louder.” It’s given us fan favorite songs like “august.” Whether this shift towards textural complexity more fully proxying for dynamic complexity is truly at the expense of, for example, more interesting harmonic complexity—well, maybe. The Thing need not imply such a zero sum game, though perhaps the data is skewed in favor of that conclusion right now. However, credit for artistic growth does not mean that growth should stop. It’s important to try out new ideas. Would the audience truly being sick of The Thing be a catalyst for another shift in Jack’s style? Only time will tell.

I’m not trying to turn this post into a referendum on whether Jack Antonoff’s music is good. The reason I point out The Thing as part of the current period of Jack’s style/work is that it is quite different than what he initially gained prominence for. Whether this shift means "good" or "bad" resulting music is purely opinion (mine is in favor of "good"). But above all I think we should value when artists change because they find something new exciting and fruitful.

If you asked someone, gun to their head, to describe Jack Antonoff’s “sound,” I’m not sure they would mention The Thing. He got famous for stuff like big drums, 80s synths, huge chord progressions for epic songs. He loves the 1-4-6-4 so much, is what I’d say if I had this gun to my head. His earlier work is very “I am going to make it obvious which chords you’re hearing, and when I pair that with some epic drums it’s going to sound cool.” Now, the chord changes are more “implied” (termed loosely). The tradeoffs he’s explored is that the more The Thing he uses, the more significant the choice of the degree to which to fill out the chord progression; the more the literal volume of the lowest bass notes matter; the more selective, sometimes, he has to be with adding percussion. Encountering and grappling with these tradeoffs is not bad. Jack Antonoff has made different music because he’s explored these tradeoffs. I, for one, find it funny that people say in the last decade he hasn’t grown or changed at all as an artist.

[tinyhrry]

F1 Fic Recs

Charles Leclerc

a thousand words @pierregazly

all about gut health @uglyducklingofthe2000s

she was my hurricane

so American @landososcar

sparks fly @taasgirl

im having his baby! @foreveralbon

73 qs @leclerc-hs

baby fever @mickyschumacher

theories of relativity @pucksandpower

dirty boy @c0eu4

the walls @matchaverse

switched @leclercvsxgow

how u get the girl @monzabee

puppy dog eyes @its-avalon-08

every second @scuderiahoney

cute first impression @hemmingsleclerc

fun road trip

father who stepped up @astonmartinii

bday wishes

student life

love languages

coucou charlie @chrisevansonly

let me show u my man @loveclerc

blue @leclercstarrs

monaco official @lovemomhatepolice

proud @of-many-fandomss

did i do that @chlerc

Oscar Piastri

best he'll ever write @solaireverie

shampoo suds @pierregazly

smile kisses

shaking for u

hug from u

sargeant reader @vivwritesfics

translator

to be loved is to be seen @norrizzandpia

fingertips @uglyducklingofthe2000s

home is where the heart is

lover @taasgirl

hard racing

evil @matchaverse

step parent

ur my love language @serpenttines

superstar @ham1lton

lowkey @artoodeetootired

dress

stop to smell the flowers @fernandopiastri28

family dinner @multiversesweets

ice princess @leclercstarrs

Mr. and Mrs. @cutielando

the set up @rosyblooom

rookie season @leclercings

mismatched plates & fairy lights @its-avalon-08

wisdom teeth @lovelytsunoda

u don't know how to drive @claypgeons

tennis crush

speak for urself @sunrizef1

Lando Norris

a flawless muse @uglyducklingofthe2000s

enough is enough

autumn sunset

white nikes

rearrangements

more than js a wag

lip balm

handle ur drink

ur name is lando

wasting love pt2

burnt out

I'm an independent woman

the scientist @luv4georgie

not so perfect strangers @rosyblooom

hit me with ur best shot

from my pov @landosjpg

stop growing up @norrisleclercf1

privacy @lillysbigwilly

childhood

i know aristotle @soamericn

the set up @cherry-leclerc

sick @annie115

wonderland @landososcar

1.30am @arieslost

penguin

miami

reckless @55szn

my poor baby @youaresimplylovely

just friends @tinycoffeeroom

bad ideas right? @keerysfreckles

thirsty boy @sharlsworld

priv not secret

lando's ballerina @chrisevansonly

girly girl @mirohlayo

olive @norrizzandpia

conv w love @mydearesthrry

crush @afterglowsainz

the other woman @theyluvkarolina

F1 Grid

fashion n' cars @youaresimplylovely

so this is my husband @uglyducklingofthe2000s

wrong number @lovemomhatepolice

sick days @moviecritc

[forkaround]

Given that I feel personally offended when people fuck with the Legends, let me list out all the queer characters on this show that come from memory:

Sara Lance - Bi

Ava Sharpe - Lesbian

Charlie - Pansexual

John Constantine - Bi

Zari Tomaz aka Zari 1.0 - Bi

Zari 2.0 - Bi

Sponner - Asexual

Gwyn Davies - Gay

Gary Green - Pansexual

Leo Snart - Gay

Mona Wu - Certified Monster Fucker (it's a fandom joke, so chill. She had sex with a coupé. Long story.)

The rest of the team is clearly not het normative. And there are many a minor queer characters.

While I didn't go into it with a QL mindset, it can certainly be, in hindsight, called a QL. What with these many Qs L-ing and all...

[nekogaaaaaaa]

I LOVE YOUR TWO FACES CHARLASTOR AU IT’S SO INTERESTING AND GENIUS AHHHHH PLS MAKE MORE- and a qs!! Which characters would already know about Charlie/Al’s two faced personalities, and will anyone else find out? ✨

THANK YOU SO MUCH!

I also enjoying when make this au and my brain officially take over by it dsfsfsga

And to answer your question, for now, Vaggie only know Charlie real persona because they both has been friends since long ago (yes, in this au they are friends) and *spoiler ahead, Charlie already know Vaggie was angel

She will eventually find out about Alastor, same with everyone

Husk and Nifty are the ones who know about Alastor, well because he himself doesn't really hide it from them, he still own their souls. I kinda want to draw something for their relationship in this au oneday, they don't know about princess of hell Charlie yet, but probably won't surprise much

The hotel will be safe place for everyone being themselve because actually in this au not only Charlie and Alastor hiding their other persona, after everyone find out nothing else to hide right?

[ifievertoldyou]

The Quackitification™

little analyses + bonus pictures under the cut :D

mediums: #2 pencil, standard 8.5x11 copy paper, royal purple crayola colored pencil

analysis time

references analysis

pre-thaw!q is intended to be q at the meetup with phil (minus the beanie) so i referenced those meetup pictures a lot when drawing him, and just really wanted him to contrast with the other qs in how carefree and happy he looks. to make it seem as though, well, he's from another world than them.

i referenced a lot of different quackity pictures with the middle 3 qs, so those ones weren't really based on any specific picture. they were all just mixes of different cc!q pictures, just like how q is kind of a mix of cc!q and c!quackity during these times, though the amount of each that he has varies depending on when in the story you're looking.

current q was heavily referenced off of that one photo of the LN!quackity photoshoot that cc!quackity did a while back, because at this point, q is his dsmp character, mentally, and now, physically. i just wanted there to be such a contrast between the first drawing being referenced off of a picture of cc!q being a cc, and the last drawing being referenced off of cc!q dressing up as his dsmp character. only it isn't really dress-up for poor q anymore.

okok now eye direction analysis time

i very intentionally drew each q looking in a different direction, so now i'm going to talk about my reasoning for that

the q from before the events of thaw has his eyes closed because he doesn't yet know the awful truth that the fun story he wrote actually happened somewhere. he looks so joyous, but at the same time, it's mostly because his eyes are still closed to the reality that he will have to grapple with throughout this story.

next we have beginning/desert!q. he doesn't have his blessing yet, and his eyes are wide with fear. he's looking to the right to indicate that the cc is still in there. after all, in q's world, he preferred using his right hand when writing, but he had to change that as he began adapting to this world, so as to not blow his cover. but desert!q hasn't yet had to do that, he's still the cc, just more scared and.. lost than usual. he's still currently abiding by the same rules and worldview that he had in his original world, so he's looking to the right, to what he knew in his original world.

then we've got post-bet!q. he's got the magic eye now, and he has to deal with way more issues than before, as he learns more about how fucked up this world is, and how horribly twisted his storytelling became here. he's looking down because now he's not just scared now, he's guilty, he blames himself for all the bad things that happened to quackity and he blames himself for all the bad things that happened to him too. he no longer has that optimistic outlook about the world, and has begun losing his old identity much faster than before. this is also where he starts adapting more to this world, and, eventually, learns to write with his left hand. there's a shift towards behavior that is more like manberg/pogtopia!quackity that's beginning in him now. he's started to look away from his old morals from before he got here and has begun doing and thinking things that he would have never done/thought before this story took place.

butcher!q is looking to the left. this is for several reasons. one, to signify how, kinda like how charlie put it, it'd be hard to tell the two gamblers apart if it wasn't for the blessed eye, because their ways of seeing the world have become so similar now. and two, it's set up for q's eye getting blinded, since it's his left eye that he loses, and that's where he was looking (at least i'm Assuming, since we haven't actually gotten a description of his blind eye from the outside pov yet) when he got blinded.

and then we have thaw!q as we know him after chapter 66. his blind eye is stuck looking to the left, and his seeing eye is looking forward, with his expression carefully neutral. he looks more like quackity than he ever did before. and he looks more like the quackity he always used to imagine than he ever did before. more importantly though, he Acts more like thaw!quackity than he ever did before, even though he has been progressively acting more and more like him all throughout the story. he's purposefully looking forward to show a sense of confidence. no longer will he allow himself to have downcast eyes or show such visible emotions (or emotions that aren't anger, at least). now he will look ahead confidently, with his best poker face, trying to seem unbothered, but deep down, the experiences and worldview of quackity will always weigh on him without him meaning to, just like his blind eye will look to the left.

misc notes

i made the hair slightly longer with the latter three qs, to show that he's been there for longer

i also made his hair longer to make him resemble my thaw!quackity design a little more (though it still isn't quite as long as my quackity's is, just because that would take some Insanely fast growing hair to get there in a month)

i initially wanted to give q some of his beauty spots, but i quickly found that it was very difficult to keep their placement consistent enough, which bugged me, so i cut that idea out

i struggled a bit with q's scar, since we haven't seen a *whole* lot of descriptions of it yet, especially not of when it's been completely healed over, as it's still currently fresh in thaw. but ultimately i settled with this design, though it took me a couple hours to figure out how i wanted it to look

i used a duller pencil when i drew pre-thaw!q, and at first this wasn't intentional, but i decided to sharpen it after i finished him, so cc!q's lines look a lot softer and duller than the other qs. but i decided halfway through this project that i'll Make it intentional, as a way to comment on how q used to be so soft before coming to this world, and he progressively got sharper and more put-together, just like his linework (though post-bet!q's linework is a bit messier and all over the place, since he's kind of going through it and hasn't quite perfected that mask of anger just yet. though, if i could've, i probably would've made his linework ever so slightly less dull than pre-thaw!q's but not nearly as sharp as the other qs. unfortunately, i can't really accurately control the dullness of my pencil at will, so that didn't happen-) but yeah, happy little accidents ^^

fun fact: i drew the first 4 qs on the same paper, and drew current q on his own separate page. he is also about 4x the size of the other qs, and is significantly more detailed

i thought about fully coloring everyone, but decided that i'd probably never get this thing done if i did that. though maybe one day i'll revist this and color them all, who knows?

now for some bonus pictures

this was my initial q design before i decided that actually, his scar looked way too much like quackity's and wasn't neat or straight enough for my liking. so uh, yeah, here's thaw!q if his scar was more thaw!quackity-ish! one of the many casualties during the great q design war™

a couple of wips, as a treat for making it all the way down here

okay that's all, thank you for making it all the way to the end of this post ^^

as always, reblogs are very much appreciated, and also make sure to check out the original fic by @alexanderwesker that i've been talking about throughout this post, if you haven't already! ^D^

[charliesimss]

All of i and M for Issy :))))))

Bringing back my lil intro pick of her for this:

I: In-the-closet

1. what is their sexuality? She's bisexual actually, i always forget until someone asks tho

2. have they ever questioned their sexuality? Yeah, hence why she came out

3. have they ever questioned their gender? Nope

4. would/was their family be okay with them being LGBT? Her literal gay dads who are Married would Prefer her not be straight. So yes they were okay with it, so was Gemma !

5. how long would/did it take for them to come out? Actually it didn't take her that long, but it took her like six years to finally figure out she was bi

M: Maternal

1. would they want a daughter or a son? Probably a daughter, because she's the oldest and only daughter so she wouldnt know what to do with a boy

2. how many children do they want? Lots, 3-5, because she didn't grow up with her siblings

3. would they be a good parent? Yes ! She's already the mom friend so of course

4. what would they name a son? What would they name a daughter? Kieran and/or Abigail

5. would they adopt? Reluctantly, like if she had to adopt a kid in her family, but she was adopted and didn't really have a great experience with it

[softcharlie]

Always Sunny really appeals to all the LGBTQs,, the Ls have Dee, the Gs have Mac, the Bs have Dennis, the Ts have Charlie,, the Qs sum up Frank..,.., truly inclusive

[hiskillingjar]

WHAT R UR OCS HAIR EYE AND SKIN COLORS...

charlie is latino and has brown skin, brown hair and brown eyes :)

edgar is white and pretty pale, he dyes his hair black (its naturally blonde) and he has blue eyes!

[xomoosexo]

Qs current group is big hispanic ccs like roier, spreen, rubius etc

I doubt he'll drop them any time soon because they regularly get 50k viewers and are massive streamers. But q could absolutely drop the ex dsmp group. The thing is, all the ccs benefit from being on the dsmp no matter how much they wish it didn't and q wants to keep the ex dsmp community, but if it becomes more beneficial to switch, he'll push out the dsmp portion like charlie, phil, Tommy, tubbo etc

that's true

[vageenween]

Music Qs!! 5, 6, 11, 21, 31!!

5- pop playlist: i finally understand by charli xcx, rock playlist: comfort eagle by cake, april playlist: yikes by kanye west

6- built to spillll, ayesha erotica, britney spears, kmfdm, elliott smith❤️❤️❤️, and plenty others

11- i hate drake so much its unreal. i feel like we would hit it off tho if we ever met and hotline bling is a banger

21- the hiv song. like girl what? it goes kinda hard tho i cant lie

31- full time lyric analyzer. songmeanings.com ily <3